Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless, expensive home add-ons.
Who can add to this list?
Gutter Guard or Gutter Helmet. I heard an average 38' x 24' ranch or split entry houses' gutters could cost up to $5,000 to replace with the "never clean your gutters again" add-ons. And you still have to clean 'em. Vinyl spray on siding. The ad I'm hearing states that it comes in 1,800 colors and looks better than fake looking vinyl siding. I've seen some good looking vinyl siding, some that looks like wood, some that looks like Shaker Shingles, haven't seen the vinyl stone siding, but I heard some brands look good. You'd think that some of the 1800 colors available in the spray-on would look like hell. And I hear it's nothing but a very expensive paint job. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless, expensive home add-ons.
Sealing an asphalt driveway. Looks pretty but kinda useless
-- Remove "zz" from e-mail address to direct reply. "TOM KAN PA" wrote in message ... Who can add to this list? Gutter Guard or Gutter Helmet. I heard an average 38' x 24' ranch or split entry houses' gutters could cost up to $5,000 to replace with the "never clean your gutters again" add-ons. And you still have to clean 'em. Vinyl spray on siding. The ad I'm hearing states that it comes in 1,800 colors and looks better than fake looking vinyl siding. I've seen some good looking vinyl siding, some that looks like wood, some that looks like Shaker Shingles, haven't seen the vinyl stone siding, but I heard some brands look good. You'd think that some of the 1800 colors available in the spray-on would look like hell. And I hear it's nothing but a very expensive paint job. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless, expensive home add-ons.
wrote in message
... On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 22:51:25 GMT, "Steve Stone" wrote: Sealing an asphalt driveway. Looks pretty but kinda useless It's not worthless if it makes your driveway pretty! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless, expensive home add-ons.
Worthless is ... a gas fireplace that looks pretty but sucks ... warm air
out of the house and doesn't recirculate warm air. It's expensive AND wastes money for the rest of time. -B "TOM KAN PA" wrote in message ... Who can add to this list? Gutter Guard or Gutter Helmet. I heard an average 38' x 24' ranch or split entry houses' gutters could cost up to $5,000 to replace with the "never clean your gutters again" add-ons. And you still have to clean 'em. Vinyl spray on siding. The ad I'm hearing states that it comes in 1,800 colors and looks better than fake looking vinyl siding. I've seen some good looking vinyl siding, some that looks like wood, some that looks like Shaker Shingles, haven't seen the vinyl stone siding, but I heard some brands look good. You'd think that some of the 1800 colors available in the spray-on would look like hell. And I hear it's nothing but a very expensive paint job. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless, expensive home add-ons.
On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 22:51:25 GMT, "Steve Stone" wrote: Sealing an asphalt driveway. Looks pretty but kinda useless That really depends on a number of factors including climate. In some areas it's just as important as painting your house. BB It keeps the water from getting under the asphalt and freezing in the winter. (Night/day freeze/thaw cycles) Minute cracks become huge tears, and eventually eroded valleys here if you don't seal the asphalt at least once every couple of years. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless, expensive home add-ons.
wrote in message
... On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 18:57:51 -0500, "Bruno" wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 22:51:25 GMT, "Steve Stone" wrote: Sealing an asphalt driveway. Looks pretty but kinda useless It's not worthless if it makes your driveway pretty! Please watch how you trim! You make it look as though you are replying to me, which you are not. I disagreed with Steve Stone. BB Will you look at that! Sorry! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless, expensive home add-ons.
I've got one for you:
Stucco coated homes are the norm in my part of the world, and a well-known, if not well-regarded, local home renovation outfit has been advertising a thin, spray-on coating they claim will increase a home's R value by something like 10 or 12 points. They say it contains tiny ceramic beads, same as the material used to insulate the space shuttle. Best of all, this miracle product can usually be applied for less than $3,000. They claim that money will be returned to homeowners through energy savings, within the first couple of years. Now, I'm not saying they're fibbing, but ... Rob |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless, expensive home add-ons.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless, expensive home add-ons.
Specter wrote:
I've got one for you: Stucco coated homes are the norm in my part of the world, and a well-known, if not well-regarded, local home renovation outfit has been advertising a thin, spray-on coating they claim will increase a home's R value by something like 10 or 12 points. They say it contains tiny ceramic beads, same as the material used to insulate the space shuttle. Best of all, this miracle product can usually be applied for less than $3,000. They claim that money will be returned to homeowners through energy savings, within the first couple of years. Now, I'm not saying they're fibbing, but ... Rob Maybe they're not. http://www.ornl.gov/info/press_relea...960910-01.html |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless, expensive home add-ons.
"MAG" wrote in message I disagree about the Gutter Guards. I have them on the back side of my house. Cost was $200 (50 linear feet, added when I had some new windows put in on that side). No gutter guards on the front side of my house. The guarded side is virtually maintenance free (I spray collected junk off the tops twice a year, about 20 minutes total per year). At that price, they seem like a good deal. I've heard prices that were MUCH more making them more on the order of a scam. Ed |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless, expensive home add-ons.
Leafguard gutter with built in gutter guards work well and look nicer
than normal gutters but are indeed expensive. On the other hand I had Gutter Helmets added to my previous house on existing gutters and they were a waste of money. They only work if your roof slope is right. "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message om... "MAG" wrote in message I disagree about the Gutter Guards. I have them on the back side of my house. Cost was $200 (50 linear feet, added when I had some new windows put in on that side). No gutter guards on the front side of my house. The guarded side is virtually maintenance free (I spray collected junk off the tops twice a year, about 20 minutes total per year). At that price, they seem like a good deal. I've heard prices that were MUCH more making them more on the order of a scam. Ed |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless, expensive home add-ons.
"TOM KAN PA" wrote in message ... Who can add to this list? My favorite is replacement windows. A home with decent storms before new windows would have about a 50 year payback on new windows. If that same homeowner bought some caulk and used it, the payback should be about 5 days. I know, many will disagree, particulary those who just spent $10k on new windows |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless, expensive home add-ons.
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 03:30:08 GMT, Chia Pet wrote:
"TOM KAN PA" wrote in message ... Who can add to this list? My favorite is replacement windows. A home with decent storms before new windows would have about a 50 year payback on new windows. If that same homeowner bought some caulk and used it, the payback should be about 5 days. I know, many will disagree, particulary those who just spent $10k on new windows Ummm.... apparently your knowledge about R-values and thermal effects are just as extensive as your knowledge of home insurance... |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless, expensive home add-ons.
user wrote: On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 03:30:08 GMT, Chia Pet wrote: "TOM KAN PA" wrote in message ... Who can add to this list? My favorite is replacement windows. A home with decent storms before new windows would have about a 50 year payback on new windows. If that same homeowner bought some caulk and used it, the payback should be about 5 days. I know, many will disagree, particulary those who just spent $10k on new windows Ummm.... apparently your knowledge about R-values and thermal effects are just as extensive as your knowledge of home insurance... Hi, It's all case by case. Everybody has different opinion and idea of those add-ons. Tony |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless, expensive home add-ons.
M R wrote: Specter wrote: I've got one for you: Stucco coated homes are the norm in my part of the world, and a well-known, if not well-regarded, local home renovation outfit has been advertising a thin, spray-on coating they claim will increase a home's R value by something like 10 or 12 points. They say it contains tiny ceramic beads, same as the material used to insulate the space shuttle. But if it burns off during takeoff and re-entry what good is it? I wonder if they also sell stick on magnets to increase the efficiency of your gas furnace? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless, expensive home add-ons.
"user" wrote in message ... On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 03:30:08 GMT, Chia Pet wrote: "TOM KAN PA" wrote in message ... Who can add to this list? My favorite is replacement windows. A home with decent storms before new windows would have about a 50 year payback on new windows. If that same homeowner bought some caulk and used it, the payback should be about 5 days. I know, many will disagree, particulary those who just spent $10k on new windows Ummm.... apparently your knowledge about R-values and thermal effects are just as extensive as your knowledge of home insurance... Anyone can buy insurance. Collecting on it when you need it, that's when the knowledge or lack of it becomes apparent. Same for windows and R-values. It is more the exception than the rule to get what you thought you bargained for with either. And that's not my experience, but what I've learned observing the experience of others. But fraud is the American way, isn't it? The economy would collapse if people stopped buying hot air. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless, expensive home add-ons.
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 19:43:39 GMT, user wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 03:30:08 GMT, Chia Pet wrote: My favorite is replacement windows. A home with decent storms before new windows would have about a 50 year payback on new windows. If that same homeowner bought some caulk and used it, the payback should be about 5 days. I know, many will disagree, particulary those who just spent $10k on new windows Ummm.... apparently your knowledge about R-values and thermal effects are just as extensive as your knowledge of home insurance... Au contraire. Some years ago I was north of Fairbanks in winter where the outdoor temperature was -30F with a brisk wind. A rinky-dink small house trailer was being used as a satellite tracking site, and the computer quit when the interior (with heaters going, of course) dropped to, well, maybe 40F. We went in and duct-taped around all the windows (there were even louvered arrangements, if memory serves! We taped those, too.) and doors. 3 hrs later, the interior temperature was 70F. Since then, I've been *very* conscious of the cumulative effect of direct heat leakage. Caulk first; buy fancy new windows later. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Worthless, expensive home add-ons.
"Frogleg" wrote in message
... On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 19:43:39 GMT, user wrote: On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 03:30:08 GMT, Chia Pet wrote: My favorite is replacement windows. A home with decent storms before new windows would have about a 50 year payback on new windows. If that same homeowner bought some caulk and used it, the payback should be about 5 days. I know, many will disagree, particulary those who just spent $10k on new windows Ummm.... apparently your knowledge about R-values and thermal effects are just as extensive as your knowledge of home insurance... Au contraire. Some years ago I was north of Fairbanks in winter where the outdoor temperature was -30F with a brisk wind. A rinky-dink small house trailer was being used as a satellite tracking site, and the computer quit when the interior (with heaters going, of course) dropped to, well, maybe 40F. We went in and duct-taped around all the windows (there were even louvered arrangements, if memory serves! We taped those, too.) and doors. 3 hrs later, the interior temperature was 70F. Since then, I've been *very* conscious of the cumulative effect of direct heat leakage. Caulk first; buy fancy new windows later. True for a trailer. In an old house with problem windows most of the heat loss is (usually) not through the windows themselves. If the old sashes have been maintained reasonably well then most of the heat loss is from air infiltration through the structure of the house (much different than trailer). Second in line is heat loss through poorly insulated walls. Even if cellulose was blown in it usually stops where fireblocking is and the walls are 2x4 anyway. Windows are a distant third, maybe 10% of total loss. A dozen cans of urethane foam, a few sheets of styrofoam, and a bucket of caulk will get the owner 300% ROI in a couple of months. Yes, do take care o f your windows, but replace them last. Seal up your house first. EJ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New Home Slab Plumbing Catastrophe | Home Repair | |||
Is this Home Repair or not | Home Repair |