Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
Has anyone determined the correct way to mount an outlet according to
code these days? I dont have a current NEC book. For many years everyone mounted them with the ground on the bottom. Then some years back they wanted the ground on the top, the reason given was because of objects falling onto the hot terminal of a plug. After that, it seems like the rules changed again, and the last I heard it was no longer a "rule" but simply personal choice. Of course that was several years ago too. From a personal point of view, I think they look stupid when the ground is on the top. I can somewhat understand the problem with the hot prong on the top and gravity issue, but aside from a metal outlet cover losing it's screw and falling onto the hot terminal, it seems pretty unlikely that any other metal object would contact the prongs. If a child is playing around an outlet, they can touch the hot prong from the bottom as well as the top. Of course they should get their butt kicked for playing with an outlet, (which of course will violate another law and get the parent sent to prison for physical abuse to a child..... but that's another issue, not to be discussed here). In the end, it seems that this matter becomes pretty senseless in the end. If the prongs of a plug are that loose, the plug usually falls out of the wall. As long as people keep metal (and all) outlet cover plate screws tight, there should be no real issue. But code is code, (right or wrong). According to code, what is the latest "approved" method to mount an outlet? I am asking this because I have an old neighbor who calls himself an electrician. (In reality, he's a handyman who does some minor electrical work, such as adding an outlet). He said he has not read the code in at least ten years, (probably more than 20 years). Yet he insists that my outlets all need to be flipped to put the ground on the top. Alvin |
#2
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
Too bad, I assume this is existing outlets not new construction?
Otherwise you could mount them sideways just to **** him off! ;^) Eric Law wrote in message ... SNIP I am asking this because I have an old neighbor who calls himself an electrician. (In reality, he's a handyman who does some minor electrical work, such as adding an outlet). He said he has not read the code in at least ten years, (probably more than 20 years). Yet he insists that my outlets all need to be flipped to put the ground on the top. Alvin |
#3
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
You can't mount it face up in a counter top. Other than that it's your
choice wrote in message ... Has anyone determined the correct way to mount an outlet according to code these days? I dont have a current NEC book. For many years everyone mounted them with the ground on the bottom. Then some years back they wanted the ground on the top, the reason given was because of objects falling onto the hot terminal of a plug. After that, it seems like the rules changed again, and the last I heard it was no longer a "rule" but simply personal choice. Of course that was several years ago too. From a personal point of view, I think they look stupid when the ground is on the top. I can somewhat understand the problem with the hot prong on the top and gravity issue, but aside from a metal outlet cover losing it's screw and falling onto the hot terminal, it seems pretty unlikely that any other metal object would contact the prongs. If a child is playing around an outlet, they can touch the hot prong from the bottom as well as the top. Of course they should get their butt kicked for playing with an outlet, (which of course will violate another law and get the parent sent to prison for physical abuse to a child..... but that's another issue, not to be discussed here). In the end, it seems that this matter becomes pretty senseless in the end. If the prongs of a plug are that loose, the plug usually falls out of the wall. As long as people keep metal (and all) outlet cover plate screws tight, there should be no real issue. But code is code, (right or wrong). According to code, what is the latest "approved" method to mount an outlet? I am asking this because I have an old neighbor who calls himself an electrician. (In reality, he's a handyman who does some minor electrical work, such as adding an outlet). He said he has not read the code in at least ten years, (probably more than 20 years). Yet he insists that my outlets all need to be flipped to put the ground on the top. Alvin |
#4
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
|
#5
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
there is no rule on this, other than no face up on a counter as previously
mentioned. Never has been. so tell mr. electrician to produce some documention (from ANY year) that proves his point. s wrote in message ... Has anyone determined the correct way to mount an outlet according to code these days? I dont have a current NEC book. For many years everyone mounted them with the ground on the bottom. Then some years back they wanted the ground on the top, the reason given was because of objects falling onto the hot terminal of a plug. After that, it seems like the rules changed again, and the last I heard it was no longer a "rule" but simply personal choice. Of course that was several years ago too. From a personal point of view, I think they look stupid when the ground is on the top. I can somewhat understand the problem with the hot prong on the top and gravity issue, but aside from a metal outlet cover losing it's screw and falling onto the hot terminal, it seems pretty unlikely that any other metal object would contact the prongs. If a child is playing around an outlet, they can touch the hot prong from the bottom as well as the top. Of course they should get their butt kicked for playing with an outlet, (which of course will violate another law and get the parent sent to prison for physical abuse to a child..... but that's another issue, not to be discussed here). In the end, it seems that this matter becomes pretty senseless in the end. If the prongs of a plug are that loose, the plug usually falls out of the wall. As long as people keep metal (and all) outlet cover plate screws tight, there should be no real issue. But code is code, (right or wrong). According to code, what is the latest "approved" method to mount an outlet? I am asking this because I have an old neighbor who calls himself an electrician. (In reality, he's a handyman who does some minor electrical work, such as adding an outlet). He said he has not read the code in at least ten years, (probably more than 20 years). Yet he insists that my outlets all need to be flipped to put the ground on the top. Alvin |
#6
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
On Sep 21, 4:51?pm, "Steve Barker LT"
wrote: there is no rule on this, other than no face up on a counter as previously mentioned. Never has been. so tell mr. electrician to produce some documention (from ANY year) that proves his point. s wrote in message ... Has anyone determined the correct way to mount an outlet according to code these days? I dont have a current NEC book. For many years everyone mounted them with the ground on the bottom. Then some years back they wanted the ground on the top, the reason given was because of objects falling onto the hot terminal of a plug. After that, it seems like the rules changed again, and the last I heard it was no longer a "rule" but simply personal choice. Of course that was several years ago too. From a personal point of view, I think they look stupid when the ground is on the top. I can somewhat understand the problem with the hot prong on the top and gravity issue, but aside from a metal outlet cover losing it's screw and falling onto the hot terminal, it seems pretty unlikely that any other metal object would contact the prongs. If a child is playing around an outlet, they can touch the hot prong from the bottom as well as the top. Of course they should get their butt kicked for playing with an outlet, (which of course will violate another law and get the parent sent to prison for physical abuse to a child..... but that's another issue, not to be discussed here). In the end, it seems that this matter becomes pretty senseless in the end. If the prongs of a plug are that loose, the plug usually falls out of the wall. As long as people keep metal (and all) outlet cover plate screws tight, there should be no real issue. But code is code, (right or wrong). According to code, what is the latest "approved" method to mount an outlet? I am asking this because I have an old neighbor who calls himself an electrician. (In reality, he's a handyman who does some minor electrical work, such as adding an outlet). He said he has not read the code in at least ten years, (probably more than 20 years). Yet he insists that my outlets all need to be flipped to put the ground on the top. Alvin- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - ground up is better, having once dropped change into a outlet with ground down. the spark display was impressive some new homes all outlets but swiched ones are ground up, switched ones ground down. saves service calls for dead outets |
#7
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
|
#8
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
On Sep 21, 5:47 pm, wrote:
Has anyone determined the correct way to mount an outlet according to code these days? .. Alvin: We recently had a long long thread here on this ng on this very topic. It covered all the options and the outcome was that unless there is written local code in some jurisdiction, there is nothing in the National Electrical Code (American) that defines up, down or sideways! Here in Canada where our systems (especially residential/domestic) are very similar we have found nothing either. Here, in this part of Canada it does seem that some of the wal-warts and small chargers for rechargeable batteries, cell phones, rechargeable flashlights etc. presently available are easier to use with the ground on the bottom. But that is only a personal observation. Built this house some 37 years ago; ours tend to be on the bottom or occasionally sideways! Terry |
#9
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
On Sep 21, 3:47 pm, wrote:
Has anyone determined the correct way to mount an outlet according to code these days? I dont have a current NEC book. For many years everyone mounted them with the ground on the bottom. Then some years If you look at most receptacles, the manufacturer's writing on the outlet is right side up with the ground prong up. I vote up. We were required to put them "up" in Atlanta health care facilities. |
#10
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
On Sep 21, 6:50 pm, (Doug Miller) wrote:
In article , wrote: Has anyone determined the correct way to mount an outlet according to code these days? [...] But code is code, (right or wrong). According to code, what is the latest "approved" method to mount an outlet? The Code doesn't care, and never has. I am asking this because I have an old neighbor who calls himself an electrician. (In reality, he's a handyman who does some minor electrical work, such as adding an outlet). He said he has not read the code in at least ten years, (probably more than 20 years). Yet he insists that my outlets all need to be flipped to put the ground on the top. My guess is, he's *never* read a Code book. Want to make some easy money? Bet him fifty bucks he can't show you *any* edition of the NEC, no matter how ancient or recent, that specifies whether receptacles in walls must be mounted up, down, or sideways. He doesn't have the first clue what he's talking about. Is there a section in Health Care? I don't use that online code book because I don't use Java due to security risks. |
#11
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
|
#12
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
wrote in message ... Has anyone determined the correct way to mount an outlet according to code these days? From a personal point of view, I think they look stupid when the ground is on the top. Code does not care. Seems to be getting more and more the accepted practice to have them ground up, especially in offices where a paper clip could fall onto the prongs. I don't know if there are any documented cases of a paper clip falling onto prongs though. In my case, two room air conditioners would have the cord hand better if the pin was up. I recently bought a power strip and the cord can be rotated on the plug to easily accommodate either. |
#13
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:54:44 -0700, Terry
wrote: On Sep 21, 3:47 pm, wrote: Has anyone determined the correct way to mount an outlet according to code these days? I dont have a current NEC book. For many years everyone mounted them with the ground on the bottom. Then some years If you look at most receptacles, the manufacturer's writing on the outlet is right side up with the ground prong up. I vote up. We were required to put them "up" in Atlanta health care facilities. But all those 3 neon bulb outlet testers they sell have their wording right side up if the outlet is ground prong down. You'd have to stand on your head to use one if the ground prong was up. My stove needs a ground prong down outlet, my refridgerator needs a ground prong up outlet. -dickm |
#14
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
In article om, Terry wrote:
On Sep 21, 6:50 pm, (Doug Miller) wrote: In article , wrote: Has anyone determined the correct way to mount an outlet according to code these days? [...] But code is code, (right or wrong). According to code, what is the latest "approved" method to mount an outlet? The Code doesn't care, and never has. I am asking this because I have an old neighbor who calls himself an electrician. (In reality, he's a handyman who does some minor electrical work, such as adding an outlet). He said he has not read the code in at least ten years, (probably more than 20 years). Yet he insists that my outlets all need to be flipped to put the ground on the top. My guess is, he's *never* read a Code book. Want to make some easy money? Bet him fifty bucks he can't show you *any* edition of the NEC, no matter how ancient or recent, that specifies whether receptacles in walls must be mounted up, down, or sideways. He doesn't have the first clue what he's talking about. Is there a section in Health Care? None that I'm aware of -- not that it would be relevant to the OP anyway. I don't use that online code book because I don't use Java due to security risks. It's not available at the moment anyway... -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com) It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again. |
#15
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:56:50 -0700, Terry
wrote: On Sep 21, 6:50 pm, (Doug Miller) wrote: In article , wrote: Has anyone determined the correct way to mount an outlet according to code these days? [...] But code is code, (right or wrong). According to code, what is the latest "approved" method to mount an outlet? The Code doesn't care, and never has. I am asking this because I have an old neighbor who calls himself an electrician. (In reality, he's a handyman who does some minor electrical work, such as adding an outlet). He said he has not read the code in at least ten years, (probably more than 20 years). Yet he insists that my outlets all need to be flipped to put the ground on the top. My guess is, he's *never* read a Code book. Want to make some easy money? Bet him fifty bucks he can't show you *any* edition of the NEC, no matter how ancient or recent, that specifies whether receptacles in walls must be mounted up, down, or sideways. He doesn't have the first clue what he's talking about. Is there a section in Health Care? I don't use that online code book because I don't use Java due to security risks. Just curious. I have heard about this online code book. Where is it (the URL)? |
#16
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 07:00:11 -0400, "Edwin Pawlowski"
wrote: wrote in message .. . Has anyone determined the correct way to mount an outlet according to code these days? From a personal point of view, I think they look stupid when the ground is on the top. Code does not care. Seems to be getting more and more the accepted practice to have them ground up, especially in offices where a paper clip could fall onto the prongs. I don't know if there are any documented cases of a paper clip falling onto prongs though. In my case, two room air conditioners would have the cord hand better if the pin was up. I recently bought a power strip and the cord can be rotated on the plug to easily accommodate either. Too bad they dont make outlets where the ground pin can be rotated to the preferred side. LOL. I never realized how confusing and complicated this could all get. The point about the neon tester is a good one, since they are intended for the ground down. As far as paperclips landing on outlets in an office, that should be grounds for dismissal. Throwing paperclips is dangerous and should not be tolerated. Heaven forbid if the ground prong was UP, and the paperclip got hung on it, and touched the hot prong as it spun around the ground prong. I sure am glad the code dont specify the correct way, the whole world would be in chaos...... |
#17
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
http://nfpa-acs-01.gvpi.net:8080/rrs...NFPASTD/7005SB
wrote in message ... On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:56:50 -0700, Terry wrote: On Sep 21, 6:50 pm, (Doug Miller) wrote: In article , wrote: Has anyone determined the correct way to mount an outlet according to code these days? [...] But code is code, (right or wrong). According to code, what is the latest "approved" method to mount an outlet? The Code doesn't care, and never has. I am asking this because I have an old neighbor who calls himself an electrician. (In reality, he's a handyman who does some minor electrical work, such as adding an outlet). He said he has not read the code in at least ten years, (probably more than 20 years). Yet he insists that my outlets all need to be flipped to put the ground on the top. My guess is, he's *never* read a Code book. Want to make some easy money? Bet him fifty bucks he can't show you *any* edition of the NEC, no matter how ancient or recent, that specifies whether receptacles in walls must be mounted up, down, or sideways. He doesn't have the first clue what he's talking about. Is there a section in Health Care? I don't use that online code book because I don't use Java due to security risks. Just curious. I have heard about this online code book. Where is it (the URL)? |
#19
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
It's not a little lame. It's a LOT lame.
s "RBM" rbm2(remove wrote in message ... The rational for ground up, always seemed a little lame to me. Those folks in Batterymarch Park have a little to much time on their hands |
#20
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
required by who?
s "Terry" wrote in message ps.com... If you look at most receptacles, the manufacturer's writing on the outlet is right side up with the ground prong up. I vote up. We were required to put them "up" in Atlanta health care facilities. |
#21
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
I'll bet you could, on purpose, dump a whole box of paperclips right down
the wall, and none would land on the prongs. And if the cord was plugged in properly, the prongs won't be exposed anyway. s "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message ... Code does not care. Seems to be getting more and more the accepted practice to have them ground up, especially in offices where a paper clip could fall onto the prongs. I don't know if there are any documented cases of a paper clip falling onto prongs though. |
#22
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
Isn't that why God created circuit breakers?
"Steve Barker LT" wrote in message ... I'll bet you could, on purpose, dump a whole box of paperclips right down the wall, and none would land on the prongs. And if the cord was plugged in properly, the prongs won't be exposed anyway. s "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message ... Code does not care. Seems to be getting more and more the accepted practice to have them ground up, especially in offices where a paper clip could fall onto the prongs. I don't know if there are any documented cases of a paper clip falling onto prongs though. |
#23
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:53:43 GMT, dicko
wrote: On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:54:44 -0700, Terry wrote: On Sep 21, 3:47 pm, wrote: Has anyone determined the correct way to mount an outlet according to code these days? I dont have a current NEC book. For many years everyone mounted them with the ground on the bottom. Then some years If you look at most receptacles, the manufacturer's writing on the outlet is right side up with the ground prong up. I vote up. We were required to put them "up" in Atlanta health care facilities. But all those 3 neon bulb outlet testers they sell have their wording right side up if the outlet is ground prong down. You'd have to stand on your head to use one if the ground prong was up. Both of my testers have the lights visible from either side. No headstands required. My stove needs a ground prong down outlet, my refridgerator needs a ground prong up outlet. -dickm -- 94 days until the winter solstice celebration Mark Lloyd http://notstupid.laughingsquid.com "DISCLAIMER If you find a posting or message from me offensive, inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it. If you don't know how to ignore a posting, complain to me and I will demonstrate." |
#24
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 07:44:41 -0500, wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 07:00:11 -0400, "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote: wrote in message . .. Has anyone determined the correct way to mount an outlet according to code these days? From a personal point of view, I think they look stupid when the ground is on the top. Code does not care. Seems to be getting more and more the accepted practice to have them ground up, especially in offices where a paper clip could fall onto the prongs. I don't know if there are any documented cases of a paper clip falling onto prongs though. In my case, two room air conditioners would have the cord hand better if the pin was up. I recently bought a power strip and the cord can be rotated on the plug to easily accommodate either. Too bad they dont make outlets where the ground pin can be rotated to the preferred side. LOL. I never realized how confusing and complicated this could all get. The point about the neon tester is a good one, since they are intended for the ground down. Such a tester should work just as well with either orientation. I don't have any ground-up wall receptacles to try this with, but they work fine in extension cords turned any way. As far as paperclips landing on outlets in an office, that should be grounds for dismissal. Throwing paperclips is dangerous and should not be tolerated. Rules don't prevent accidents (or 2 year olds). Heaven forbid if the ground prong was UP, and the paperclip got hung on it, and touched the hot prong as it spun around the ground prong. That would be difficult to arrange. You could fit a paper clip around the ground prong and then plug it in. I sure am glad the code dont specify the correct way, the whole world would be in chaos...... -- 94 days until the winter solstice celebration Mark Lloyd http://notstupid.laughingsquid.com "DISCLAIMER If you find a posting or message from me offensive, inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it. If you don't know how to ignore a posting, complain to me and I will demonstrate." |
#25
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 08:27:53 -0500, "Steve Barker LT"
wrote: I'll bet you could, on purpose, dump a whole box of paperclips right down the wall, and none would land on the prongs. However, the probability of this causing a short is still greater than with the ground up. And if the cord was plugged in properly, the prongs won't be exposed anyway. These things (plugs) do get knocked loose. If the prongs still make contact, the user is unlikely to notice. s "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message .. . Code does not care. Seems to be getting more and more the accepted practice to have them ground up, especially in offices where a paper clip could fall onto the prongs. I don't know if there are any documented cases of a paper clip falling onto prongs though. -- 94 days until the winter solstice celebration Mark Lloyd http://notstupid.laughingsquid.com "DISCLAIMER If you find a posting or message from me offensive, inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it. If you don't know how to ignore a posting, complain to me and I will demonstrate." |
#26
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:02:12 -0400, "RBM" rbm2(remove
wrote: Isn't that why God created circuit breakers? There's still a spark, and sometimes a receptacle will be close to a leaking gas heater. "Steve Barker LT" wrote in message m... I'll bet you could, on purpose, dump a whole box of paperclips right down the wall, and none would land on the prongs. And if the cord was plugged in properly, the prongs won't be exposed anyway. s "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message ... Code does not care. Seems to be getting more and more the accepted practice to have them ground up, especially in offices where a paper clip could fall onto the prongs. I don't know if there are any documented cases of a paper clip falling onto prongs though. -- 94 days until the winter solstice celebration Mark Lloyd http://notstupid.laughingsquid.com "DISCLAIMER If you find a posting or message from me offensive, inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it. If you don't know how to ignore a posting, complain to me and I will demonstrate." |
#27
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
Too bad they dont make outlets where the ground pin can be rotated to the preferred side. LOL. Like this: http://www.360electrical.com/index-3.html -- *** email address mangled *** Look at the email address before replying. It is easy to fix. Thanks Dave Schultz wrote in message ... On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 07:00:11 -0400, "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote: wrote in message . .. Has anyone determined the correct way to mount an outlet according to code these days? From a personal point of view, I think they look stupid when the ground is on the top. Code does not care. Seems to be getting more and more the accepted practice to have them ground up, especially in offices where a paper clip could fall onto the prongs. I don't know if there are any documented cases of a paper clip falling onto prongs though. In my case, two room air conditioners would have the cord hand better if the pin was up. I recently bought a power strip and the cord can be rotated on the plug to easily accommodate either. Too bad they dont make outlets where the ground pin can be rotated to the preferred side. LOL. I never realized how confusing and complicated this could all get. The point about the neon tester is a good one, since they are intended for the ground down. As far as paperclips landing on outlets in an office, that should be grounds for dismissal. Throwing paperclips is dangerous and should not be tolerated. Heaven forbid if the ground prong was UP, and the paperclip got hung on it, and touched the hot prong as it spun around the ground prong. I sure am glad the code dont specify the correct way, the whole world would be in chaos...... |
#28
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
I think you have to many "what if's" to make it practical
"Mark Lloyd" wrote in message ... On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:02:12 -0400, "RBM" rbm2(remove wrote: Isn't that why God created circuit breakers? There's still a spark, and sometimes a receptacle will be close to a leaking gas heater. "Steve Barker LT" wrote in message om... I'll bet you could, on purpose, dump a whole box of paperclips right down the wall, and none would land on the prongs. And if the cord was plugged in properly, the prongs won't be exposed anyway. s "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message ... Code does not care. Seems to be getting more and more the accepted practice to have them ground up, especially in offices where a paper clip could fall onto the prongs. I don't know if there are any documented cases of a paper clip falling onto prongs though. -- 94 days until the winter solstice celebration Mark Lloyd http://notstupid.laughingsquid.com "DISCLAIMER If you find a posting or message from me offensive, inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it. If you don't know how to ignore a posting, complain to me and I will demonstrate." |
#29
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
"Mark Lloyd" wrote in message ... On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:02:12 -0400, "RBM" rbm2(remove wrote: Isn't that why God created circuit breakers? There's still a spark, and sometimes a receptacle will be close to a leaking gas heater. That is why you put up the asbestos barrier. |
#30
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
Don't get him started with asbestos!!!
"Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message . .. "Mark Lloyd" wrote in message ... On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:02:12 -0400, "RBM" rbm2(remove wrote: Isn't that why God created circuit breakers? There's still a spark, and sometimes a receptacle will be close to a leaking gas heater. That is why you put up the asbestos barrier. |
#31
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:16:42 -0400, "RBM" rbm2(remove
wrote: I think you have to many "what if's" to make it practical That could be true if installing a receptacle ground-up was any harder than installing it ground-down. Since there isn't any difference there, even a very small difference in risk makes it worthwhile. "Mark Lloyd" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:02:12 -0400, "RBM" rbm2(remove wrote: Isn't that why God created circuit breakers? There's still a spark, and sometimes a receptacle will be close to a leaking gas heater. "Steve Barker LT" wrote in message news:mb2dnfcgz8oKimjbnZ2dnUVZ_v2unZ2d@giganews. com... I'll bet you could, on purpose, dump a whole box of paperclips right down the wall, and none would land on the prongs. And if the cord was plugged in properly, the prongs won't be exposed anyway. s "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message ... Code does not care. Seems to be getting more and more the accepted practice to have them ground up, especially in offices where a paper clip could fall onto the prongs. I don't know if there are any documented cases of a paper clip falling onto prongs though. -- 94 days until the winter solstice celebration Mark Lloyd http://notstupid.laughingsquid.com "DISCLAIMER If you find a posting or message from me offensive, inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it. If you don't know how to ignore a posting, complain to me and I will demonstrate." -- 94 days until the winter solstice celebration Mark Lloyd http://notstupid.laughingsquid.com "DISCLAIMER If you find a posting or message from me offensive, inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it. If you don't know how to ignore a posting, complain to me and I will demonstrate." |
#32
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:46:11 -0400, "Edwin Pawlowski"
wrote: "Mark Lloyd" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:02:12 -0400, "RBM" rbm2(remove wrote: Isn't that why God created circuit breakers? There's still a spark, and sometimes a receptacle will be close to a leaking gas heater. That is why you put up the asbestos barrier. And hope you don't have one of those non-trip breakers people have been talking about. -- 94 days until the winter solstice celebration Mark Lloyd http://notstupid.laughingsquid.com "DISCLAIMER If you find a posting or message from me offensive, inappropriate, or disruptive, please ignore it. If you don't know how to ignore a posting, complain to me and I will demonstrate." |
#33
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
In article ,
"Edwin Pawlowski" wrote: "Mark Lloyd" wrote in message ... On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:02:12 -0400, "RBM" rbm2(remove wrote: Isn't that why God created circuit breakers? There's still a spark, and sometimes a receptacle will be close to a leaking gas heater. That is why you put up the asbestos barrier. You really shouldn't enter a room where electricity may be in use, without leather gloves, a full face mask, and a kevlar suit. Particularly now that so many of our electrons are imported from China. |
#34
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
It was required by the person who brought us our paychecks.
The reason he gave was that a metal item falling down the wall would hit the ground plug instead of the hot if the cord was not fully plugged in. (We also used stainless steel receptacle covers and the screws do work loose) "They" said it was a requirement in "patient care areas" Dunno if it was local or where it came from, but it was law for us. On Sep 22, 9:25 am, "Steve Barker LT" wrote: required by who? s "Terry" wrote in message ps.com... If you look at most receptacles, the manufacturer's writing on the outlet is right side up with the ground prong up. I vote up. We were required to put them "up" in Atlanta health care facilities |
#35
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
"Terry" wrote in message ps.com... It was required by the person who brought us our paychecks. Seems like a good enough reason to me. |
#36
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
Company rule, not "law". And he was out of line. Also, why would the cover
plate screws work loose? I've never seen one work loose in my life. s "Terry" wrote in message ps.com... It was required by the person who brought us our paychecks. The reason he gave was that a metal item falling down the wall would hit the ground plug instead of the hot if the cord was not fully plugged in. (We also used stainless steel receptacle covers and the screws do work loose) "They" said it was a requirement in "patient care areas" Dunno if it was local or where it came from, but it was law for us. |
#37
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
If you're a follower and never question authority, i guess it's a good rule.
s "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message ... "Terry" wrote in message ps.com... It was required by the person who brought us our paychecks.f Seems like a good enough reason to me. |
#38
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Outlet position according to code.
"Steve Barker LT" wrote in message ... If you're a follower and never question authority, i guess it's a good rule. s There are times to vehemently question authority, there are times to do what you are told. Works both way. I often take the suggestions from subordinates but I sometimes just say "that is the way I want it". I don't have to give a reason, other than I'm the boss. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
is gfci outlet good replacement for two-prong non-grounded outlet ?? | Home Repair | |||
I want to test C#code ,how Can i study ,? I want to get C# code What site.? | Home Repair | |||
Ok to use outlet boxes larger than required by code? | Home Repair | |||
Piggy-backing new 125v outlet on existing 250v outlet? | Home Repair | |||
Mid-Position 3 Port Valve - Hot Water (A) position & OFF - but HW flow to boiler? | UK diy |