For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave

Jim Thompson wrote:
For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html

I don't know if I read what you said about Plame, but here
is a excerpt from that article that pretty well sums up its
content:

(begin excerpt)
Bates stressed in his ruling that the couple's allegations
"pose important questions relating to the propriety of
actions undertaken by our highest government officials," but
that he had to dismiss the claims for jurisdictional reasons
and so would not express an opinion on their merits.

He also ruled that his court lacks the power to award
damages for the claims about public disclosure of private
information about Plame, because the couple has not yet
exhausted other remedies in seeking compensation from the
appropriate federal agencies for those alleged violations.
(end excerpt)

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:32:19 -0400, John Popelish
wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html

I don't know if I read what you said about Plame, but here
is a excerpt from that article that pretty well sums up its
content:

(begin excerpt)
Bates stressed in his ruling that the couple's allegations
"pose important questions relating to the propriety of
actions undertaken by our highest government officials," but
that he had to dismiss the claims for jurisdictional reasons
and so would not express an opinion on their merits.

He also ruled that his court lacks the power to award
damages for the claims about public disclosure of private
information about Plame, because the couple has not yet
exhausted other remedies in seeking compensation from the
appropriate federal agencies for those alleged violations.
(end excerpt)

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you for
reading the article ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave

Jim Thompson wrote:

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you for
reading the article ;-)

Since when have right wind fatheads like yourself behaved any differently ?

Graham

Eeyore wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you for
reading the article ;-)

Since when have right wind fatheads like yourself behaved any differently ?

I think that is what the ironic wink meant.

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:35:40 -0500, flipper wrote:

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:32:19 -0400, John Popelish
wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html

I don't know if I read what you said about Plame, but here
is a excerpt from that article that pretty well sums up its
content:

(begin excerpt)
Bates stressed in his ruling that the couple's allegations
"pose important questions relating to the propriety of
actions undertaken by our highest government officials," but
that he had to dismiss the claims for jurisdictional reasons
and so would not express an opinion on their merits.

Propriety: the customs and manners of polite society.

If the left wants to make 'rudeness' a legal 'offense' then they best
be prepared to spend eternity in court as defendants.

[snip]

What I'm looking forward to is culmination of the left's insistence on
reviving the "fairness doctrine".

Then the leftist video and newspaper media will have to allow
rebuttals.

The right will just move to subscription radio where they'll have no
problem getting sponsors, while the left will flounder with no one to
support such crap as Al Franken.

Bwahahahaha ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave

Jim Thompson wrote:

For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html


I'm not sure what this proves. What did you originally claim about
Valerie Plame?

--
Paul Hovnanian
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Free the Mallocs!

Eeyore wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you for
reading the article ;-)

Since when have right wind fatheads like yourself behaved any differently ?

Graham


Right wind? As opposed to 'Wrong wind', or 'Left wind'?


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you for
reading the article ;-)

Since when have right wind fatheads like yourself behaved any differently ?

Graham

Right wind? As opposed to 'Wrong wind', or 'Left wind'?

It depends on which way you lean (before breaking wind, that is).

;-)

--
Paul Hovnanian
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Free the Mallocs!

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:33:26 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html


Jim's playing the Plame game again... ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you for
reading the article ;-)

Since when have right wind fatheads like yourself behaved any differently ?

Graham

Right wind? As opposed to 'Wrong wind', or 'Left wind'?

It depends on which way you lean (before breaking wind, that is).

;-)


As long as it isn't 'Donkey wind'! That would create another EPA
super fund site in a few nanoseconds.

--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:27:09 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:32:19 -0400, John Popelish
wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html

I don't know if I read what you said about Plame, but here
is a excerpt from that article that pretty well sums up its
content:

(begin excerpt)
Bates stressed in his ruling that the couple's allegations
"pose important questions relating to the propriety of
actions undertaken by our highest government officials," but
that he had to dismiss the claims for jurisdictional reasons
and so would not express an opinion on their merits.

He also ruled that his court lacks the power to award
damages for the claims about public disclosure of private
information about Plame, because the couple has not yet
exhausted other remedies in seeking compensation from the
appropriate federal agencies for those alleged violations.
(end excerpt)

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you for
reading the article ;-)

...Jim Thompson

As long as George Dubya or his buddies don't pick on you, everthang's
great. It's what they call the peckering order.

RL

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote in message
...
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you
for
reading the article ;-)

Since when have right wind fatheads like yourself behaved any
differently ?

Graham

Right wind? As opposed to 'Wrong wind', or 'Left wind'?

It depends on which way you lean (before breaking wind, that is).

Usually I lean to the left (lifting right cheek) when farting, so the wind
gushes out to the right - is that left wind or right wind?

ian field wrote:

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote in message
...
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you
for
reading the article ;-)

Since when have right wind fatheads like yourself behaved any
differently ?

Graham

Right wind? As opposed to 'Wrong wind', or 'Left wind'?

It depends on which way you lean (before breaking wind, that is).

Usually I lean to the left (lifting right cheek) when farting, so the wind
gushes out to the right - is that left wind or right wind?


That's Donkey wind.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 01:28:03 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

ian field wrote:

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote in message
...
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you
for
reading the article ;-)

Since when have right wind fatheads like yourself behaved any
differently ?

Graham

Right wind? As opposed to 'Wrong wind', or 'Left wind'?

It depends on which way you lean (before breaking wind, that is).

Usually I lean to the left (lifting right cheek) when farting, so the wind
gushes out to the right - is that left wind or right wind?


That's Donkey wind.

Depends on whether it's in a free-fart zone or not ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 01:28:03 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

ian field wrote:

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote in message
...
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you
for
reading the article ;-)

Since when have right wind fatheads like yourself behaved any
differently ?

Graham

Right wind? As opposed to 'Wrong wind', or 'Left wind'?

It depends on which way you lean (before breaking wind, that is).

Usually I lean to the left (lifting right cheek) when farting, so the wind
gushes out to the right - is that left wind or right wind?


That's Donkey wind.

Depends on whether it's in a free-fart zone or not ;-)


Do you want to take that chance? Donkey farts not only peel the
paint, they eat concrete.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...
Jim Thompson wrote:

On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 01:28:03 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

ian field wrote:

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote in message
...
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank
you
for
reading the article ;-)

Since when have right wind fatheads like yourself behaved any
differently ?

Graham

Right wind? As opposed to 'Wrong wind', or 'Left wind'?

It depends on which way you lean (before breaking wind, that is).

Usually I lean to the left (lifting right cheek) when farting, so the
wind
gushes out to the right - is that left wind or right wind?


That's Donkey wind.

Depends on whether it's in a free-fart zone or not ;-)


Do you want to take that chance? Donkey farts not only peel the
paint, they eat concrete.

Hmm............The paints still OK and the building hasn't crumbled yet, I
must need more chilli on my kebabs.

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 20:31:59 +0000, ian field wrote:
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote in message
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you
for
reading the article ;-)

Since when have right wind fatheads like yourself behaved any
differently ?

Right wind? As opposed to 'Wrong wind', or 'Left wind'?

It depends on which way you lean (before breaking wind, that is).

Usually I lean to the left (lifting right cheek) when farting, so the wind
gushes out to the right - is that left wind or right wind?

I fart right up the middle, because it tickles my balls.
--
Cheers!
Rich^H^H^H^HBoBo

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:27:09 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you for
reading the article ;-)

And this is different from the neocons because _________________________?

Thanks,
Rich

"Bobo The Chimp" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 20:31:59 +0000, ian field wrote:
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote in message
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you
for
reading the article ;-)

Since when have right wind fatheads like yourself behaved any
differently ?

Right wind? As opposed to 'Wrong wind', or 'Left wind'?

It depends on which way you lean (before breaking wind, that is).

Usually I lean to the left (lifting right cheek) when farting, so the
wind
gushes out to the right - is that left wind or right wind?

I fart right up the middle, because it tickles my balls.

On the bus its better to lean forward and eject the gas out your "coin slot"
so it passes through the gap between the seat and the back - tight jeans
result in a satisfying rasp.

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html


I'm not sure what this proves. What did you originally claim about
Valerie Plame?

Nothing yet? Not even a reference to an old post?

--
Paul Hovnanian
------------------------------------------------------------------
mv Windows /dev/null

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:22:15 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html


I'm not sure what this proves. What did you originally claim about
Valerie Plame?

Nothing yet? Not even a reference to an old post?

That she set up the whole scenario herself.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave

Jim Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:22:15 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html

I'm not sure what this proves. What did you originally claim about
Valerie Plame?
Nothing yet? Not even a reference to an old post?

That she set up the whole scenario herself.

...Jim Thompson

My reading comprehension must be seriously damaged, could you
point out where in the article that it was implied, or stated,
that she set up the whole scenario herself?

All I saw was the judges ruling that it was normal for persons
in high political office to discuss such things with the press,
and that the case was out of the court's jurisdiction.

-Chuck

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:43:03 -0400, Chuck Harris wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:22:15 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html

I'm not sure what this proves. What did you originally claim about
Valerie Plame?
Nothing yet? Not even a reference to an old post?

That she set up the whole scenario herself.

My reading comprehension must be seriously damaged, could you point out
where in the article that it was implied, or stated, that she set up the
whole scenario herself?

All I saw was the judges ruling that it was normal for persons in high
political office to discuss such things with the press, and that the case
was out of the court's jurisdiction.

Ah, Jim's just playing the Plame Game again...

Cheers!
Rich

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:22:15 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html


I'm not sure what this proves. What did you originally claim about
Valerie Plame?

Nothing yet? Not even a reference to an old post?

That she set up the whole scenario herself.

There's no evidence it that article that Plame had anything to do with
Wilson's investigation, conclusions and subsequent article.

Another article (posted elsewhere in this thread) indicates that she did
nothing more than suggest her husband to CIA officials as a possible
consultant in their investigation.

Not everything is a conspiracy to undermine the administration's
credibility. Jim. Often they do a pretty good job of it themselves.

--
Paul Hovnanian
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Free the Mallocs!

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:39:25 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:22:15 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html


I'm not sure what this proves. What did you originally claim about
Valerie Plame?

Nothing yet? Not even a reference to an old post?

That she set up the whole scenario herself.

There's no evidence it that article that Plame had anything to do with
Wilson's investigation, conclusions and subsequent article.

Another article (posted elsewhere in this thread) indicates that she did
nothing more than suggest her husband to CIA officials as a possible
consultant in their investigation.

Not everything is a conspiracy to undermine the administration's
credibility. Jim. Often they do a pretty good job of it themselves.

Your supreme status as a close-minded leftist-weenie is duly noted.
You have been entered into the contest for deepest head in the sand
;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:15:40 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

Your supreme status as a close-minded leftist-weenie is duly noted. You
have been entered into the contest for deepest head in the sand ;-)

Can you say, "POT ... KETTLE ... BLACK"? ;-D
--
Cheers!
Rich^H^H^H^HBoBo

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:15:40 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

Your supreme status as a close-minded leftist-weenie is duly noted. You
have been entered into the contest for deepest head in the sand ;-)

Yeah, hey! 33% of the American People can't be wrong, can they?
http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm
--
Flap!
The Pig Bladder from Uranus, still
waiting for that hot babe to ask me
what my favorite planet is.

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:39:29 GMT, The Pig Bladder from Uranus
wrote:

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:15:40 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

Your supreme status as a close-minded leftist-weenie is duly noted. You
have been entered into the contest for deepest head in the sand ;-)

Yeah, hey! 33% of the American People can't be wrong, can they?
http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm

And Congress has a WORSE rating.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:15:40 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

... head in the sand ;-)

Boy ostrich is chasing girl ostrich across desert. Girl ostrich quickly
makes a turn behind a dune, and hides her head in the sand. Boy ostrich
rounds sand dune, looks around, says, "Where'd she go?"

And George W. Bush still thinks "victory" is possible in Iraq. And he
thinks he'll wipe out Global Terrorism. And Al Gore thinks he can
stop Global Warming.

Would you rather be hung or shot?

Thanks,
Rich

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:42:57 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:39:29 GMT, The Pig Bladder from Uranus
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:15:40 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

Your supreme status as a close-minded leftist-weenie is duly noted. You
have been entered into the contest for deepest head in the sand ;-)

Yeah, hey! 33% of the American People can't be wrong, can they?
http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm

And Congress has a WORSE rating.

OK, so the dummycrats are turning out to be just as bad of liars,
cheats, and thieves that the repugnacons have been all along.

So what? All statists are evil.

Thanks,
Rich

"Chuck Harris" wrote in message


My reading comprehension must be seriously damaged, could you
point out where in the article that it was implied, or stated,
that she set up the whole scenario herself?

All I saw was the judges ruling that it was normal for persons
in high political office to discuss such things with the press,
and that the case was out of the court's jurisdiction.

How is it that everyone forgot who actually named her? Or that the
prosecutor was told early in the investigation who it was but went after
Libby anyway? Or that she was working at a desk because she had been outed
years before, so the law in question didn't apply? Or that her husband, who
actually was working overseas outed himself when he published his story in
the NYT instead of submitting a written report to his superiors? Or that he
claimed to have submitted a report and the 9-11 Commission determined that
he lied?


--

Reply in group, but if emailing add another
zero, and remove the last word.

On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:43:58 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:

"Chuck Harris" wrote in message


My reading comprehension must be seriously damaged, could you
point out where in the article that it was implied, or stated,
that she set up the whole scenario herself?

All I saw was the judges ruling that it was normal for persons
in high political office to discuss such things with the press,
and that the case was out of the court's jurisdiction.

How is it that everyone forgot who actually named her? Or that the
prosecutor was told early in the investigation who it was but went after
Libby anyway? Or that she was working at a desk because she had been outed
years before, so the law in question didn't apply? Or that her husband, who
actually was working overseas outed himself when he published his story in
the NYT instead of submitting a written report to his superiors? Or that he
claimed to have submitted a report and the 9-11 Commission determined that
he lied?

Leftist weenies are not only humorless, but are deep into
Alzheimer-like denial as well.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave

Tom Del Rosso wrote:
"Chuck Harris" wrote in message

My reading comprehension must be seriously damaged, could you
point out where in the article that it was implied, or stated,
that she set up the whole scenario herself?

All I saw was the judges ruling that it was normal for persons
in high political office to discuss such things with the press,
and that the case was out of the court's jurisdiction.

How is it that everyone forgot who actually named her? Or that the
prosecutor was told early in the investigation who it was but went after
Libby anyway? Or that she was working at a desk because she had been outed
years before, so the law in question didn't apply? Or that her husband, who
actually was working overseas outed himself when he published his story in
the NYT instead of submitting a written report to his superiors? Or that he
claimed to have submitted a report and the 9-11 Commission determined that
he lied?

I'm not forgetting any of that, I just asked how Jim came to the
conclusion he did from reading the article he posted. I read it,
and my synopsis is above. I may have missed something in the article,
and was asking to be clued in.

-Chuck

Jim Thompson wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:43:58 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
wrote:

"Chuck Harris" wrote in message

My reading comprehension must be seriously damaged, could you
point out where in the article that it was implied, or stated,
that she set up the whole scenario herself?

All I saw was the judges ruling that it was normal for persons
in high political office to discuss such things with the press,
and that the case was out of the court's jurisdiction.
How is it that everyone forgot who actually named her? Or that the
prosecutor was told early in the investigation who it was but went after
Libby anyway? Or that she was working at a desk because she had been outed
years before, so the law in question didn't apply? Or that her husband, who
actually was working overseas outed himself when he published his story in
the NYT instead of submitting a written report to his superiors? Or that he
claimed to have submitted a report and the 9-11 Commission determined that
he lied?

Leftist weenies are not only humorless, but are deep into
Alzheimer-like denial as well.

...Jim Thompson

Jim, I'm as conservative as you, perhaps more. Stop the name calling,
and answer my question.

-Chuck

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:39:25 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:

[snip]

Not everything is a conspiracy to undermine the administration's
credibility. Jim. Often they do a pretty good job of it themselves.

So what do you call the current Congress? With a performance rating
LOWER than GWB.

Dirty Harry Reid's performance is beneficial to Republican candidates
;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave