Electronic Schematics (alt.binaries.schematics.electronic) A place to show and share your electronics schematic drawings.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,221
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...

For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 172
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...

Jim Thompson wrote:
For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html


I don't know if I read what you said about Plame, but here
is a excerpt from that article that pretty well sums up its
content:

(begin excerpt)
Bates stressed in his ruling that the couple's allegations
"pose important questions relating to the propriety of
actions undertaken by our highest government officials," but
that he had to dismiss the claims for jurisdictional reasons
and so would not express an opinion on their merits.

He also ruled that his court lacks the power to award
damages for the claims about public disclosure of private
information about Plame, because the couple has not yet
exhausted other remedies in seeking compensation from the
appropriate federal agencies for those alleged violations.
(end excerpt)
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,221
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:32:19 -0400, John Popelish
wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html


I don't know if I read what you said about Plame, but here
is a excerpt from that article that pretty well sums up its
content:

(begin excerpt)
Bates stressed in his ruling that the couple's allegations
"pose important questions relating to the propriety of
actions undertaken by our highest government officials," but
that he had to dismiss the claims for jurisdictional reasons
and so would not express an opinion on their merits.

He also ruled that his court lacks the power to award
damages for the claims about public disclosure of private
information about Plame, because the couple has not yet
exhausted other remedies in seeking compensation from the
appropriate federal agencies for those alleged violations.
(end excerpt)


Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you for
reading the article ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave
  #4   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,770
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...



Jim Thompson wrote:

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you for
reading the article ;-)


Since when have right wind fatheads like yourself behaved any differently ?

Graham

  #5   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 172
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...

Eeyore wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you for
reading the article ;-)


Since when have right wind fatheads like yourself behaved any differently ?


I think that is what the ironic wink meant.


  #6   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,924
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...

Eeyore wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you for
reading the article ;-)


Since when have right wind fatheads like yourself behaved any differently ?

Graham



Right wind? As opposed to 'Wrong wind', or 'Left wind'?


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
  #7   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 34
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you for
reading the article ;-)


Since when have right wind fatheads like yourself behaved any differently ?

Graham


Right wind? As opposed to 'Wrong wind', or 'Left wind'?


It depends on which way you lean (before breaking wind, that is).

;-)

--
Paul Hovnanian
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Free the Mallocs!
  #8   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 436
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:27:09 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:32:19 -0400, John Popelish
wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html


I don't know if I read what you said about Plame, but here
is a excerpt from that article that pretty well sums up its
content:

(begin excerpt)
Bates stressed in his ruling that the couple's allegations
"pose important questions relating to the propriety of
actions undertaken by our highest government officials," but
that he had to dismiss the claims for jurisdictional reasons
and so would not express an opinion on their merits.

He also ruled that his court lacks the power to award
damages for the claims about public disclosure of private
information about Plame, because the couple has not yet
exhausted other remedies in seeking compensation from the
appropriate federal agencies for those alleged violations.
(end excerpt)


Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you for
reading the article ;-)

...Jim Thompson


As long as George Dubya or his buddies don't pick on you, everthang's
great. It's what they call the peckering order.

RL
  #9   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 121
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:27:09 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

Leftist weenies only quote what they want to hear, but I thank you for
reading the article ;-)


And this is different from the neocons because _________________________?

Thanks,
Rich


  #10   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,221
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:35:40 -0500, flipper wrote:

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:32:19 -0400, John Popelish
wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html


I don't know if I read what you said about Plame, but here
is a excerpt from that article that pretty well sums up its
content:

(begin excerpt)
Bates stressed in his ruling that the couple's allegations
"pose important questions relating to the propriety of
actions undertaken by our highest government officials," but
that he had to dismiss the claims for jurisdictional reasons
and so would not express an opinion on their merits.


Propriety: the customs and manners of polite society.

If the left wants to make 'rudeness' a legal 'offense' then they best
be prepared to spend eternity in court as defendants.

[snip]

What I'm looking forward to is culmination of the left's insistence on
reviving the "fairness doctrine".

Then the leftist video and newspaper media will have to allow
rebuttals.

The right will just move to subscription radio where they'll have no
problem getting sponsors, while the left will flounder with no one to
support such crap as Al Franken.

Bwahahahaha ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave


  #11   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 34
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...

Jim Thompson wrote:

For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html


I'm not sure what this proves. What did you originally claim about
Valerie Plame?

--
Paul Hovnanian
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Free the Mallocs!
  #12   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 421
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html


I'm not sure what this proves. What did you originally claim about
Valerie Plame?


Nothing yet? Not even a reference to an old post?

--
Paul Hovnanian
------------------------------------------------------------------
mv Windows /dev/null
  #13   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,221
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:22:15 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html


I'm not sure what this proves. What did you originally claim about
Valerie Plame?


Nothing yet? Not even a reference to an old post?


That she set up the whole scenario herself.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave
  #14   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 125
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...

Jim Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:22:15 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html

I'm not sure what this proves. What did you originally claim about
Valerie Plame?

Nothing yet? Not even a reference to an old post?


That she set up the whole scenario herself.

...Jim Thompson


My reading comprehension must be seriously damaged, could you
point out where in the article that it was implied, or stated,
that she set up the whole scenario herself?

All I saw was the judges ruling that it was normal for persons
in high political office to discuss such things with the press,
and that the case was out of the court's jurisdiction.

-Chuck
  #15   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 121
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:43:03 -0400, Chuck Harris wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:22:15 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html

I'm not sure what this proves. What did you originally claim about
Valerie Plame?
Nothing yet? Not even a reference to an old post?


That she set up the whole scenario herself.


My reading comprehension must be seriously damaged, could you point out
where in the article that it was implied, or stated, that she set up the
whole scenario herself?

All I saw was the judges ruling that it was normal for persons in high
political office to discuss such things with the press, and that the case
was out of the court's jurisdiction.


Ah, Jim's just playing the Plame Game again...

Cheers!
Rich



  #16   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 130
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...

"Chuck Harris" wrote in message


My reading comprehension must be seriously damaged, could you
point out where in the article that it was implied, or stated,
that she set up the whole scenario herself?

All I saw was the judges ruling that it was normal for persons
in high political office to discuss such things with the press,
and that the case was out of the court's jurisdiction.


How is it that everyone forgot who actually named her? Or that the
prosecutor was told early in the investigation who it was but went after
Libby anyway? Or that she was working at a desk because she had been outed
years before, so the law in question didn't apply? Or that her husband, who
actually was working overseas outed himself when he published his story in
the NYT instead of submitting a written report to his superiors? Or that he
claimed to have submitted a report and the 9-11 Commission determined that
he lied?


--

Reply in group, but if emailing add another
zero, and remove the last word.


  #17   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 34
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:22:15 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html


I'm not sure what this proves. What did you originally claim about
Valerie Plame?


Nothing yet? Not even a reference to an old post?


That she set up the whole scenario herself.


There's no evidence it that article that Plame had anything to do with
Wilson's investigation, conclusions and subsequent article.

Another article (posted elsewhere in this thread) indicates that she did
nothing more than suggest her husband to CIA officials as a possible
consultant in their investigation.

Not everything is a conspiracy to undermine the administration's
credibility. Jim. Often they do a pretty good job of it themselves.

--
Paul Hovnanian
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Free the Mallocs!
  #18   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,221
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:39:25 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:22:15 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html


I'm not sure what this proves. What did you originally claim about
Valerie Plame?

Nothing yet? Not even a reference to an old post?


That she set up the whole scenario herself.


There's no evidence it that article that Plame had anything to do with
Wilson's investigation, conclusions and subsequent article.

Another article (posted elsewhere in this thread) indicates that she did
nothing more than suggest her husband to CIA officials as a possible
consultant in their investigation.

Not everything is a conspiracy to undermine the administration's
credibility. Jim. Often they do a pretty good job of it themselves.


Your supreme status as a close-minded leftist-weenie is duly noted.
You have been entered into the contest for deepest head in the sand
;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave
  #19   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,221
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 10:39:25 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:

[snip]

Not everything is a conspiracy to undermine the administration's
credibility. Jim. Often they do a pretty good job of it themselves.


So what do you call the current Congress? With a performance rating
LOWER than GWB.

Dirty Harry Reid's performance is beneficial to Republican candidates
;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave
  #20   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 121
Default For the snotty leftist weenie...

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:33:26 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

For the snotty leftist weenie who claimed I was wrong about Valerie
Plame....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...071901395.html


Jim's playing the Plame game again... ;-)

Cheers!
Rich



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
INCREMENTAL ESCALATION OF SATANIC CENSORSHIP BY PAROCHIAL LEFTIST FORUM MODERATORS Raymond Karczewski Home Repair 0 July 4th 06 11:50 AM
how to do foundations for extension with snotty neighbour? Steve North UK diy 7 September 25th 03 12:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"