On 5/26/2016 1:17 PM, Swingman wrote:
On 5/26/2016 12:37 PM, Leon wrote:

Now if you are simply saying that the Monster instrument cable is
better, quality wise, than what you can find anywhere else, I totally
understand and would have to agree.

That's exactly what I been saying, over and over, cher!



I'm not preaching, just agreeing. ;!)

On 5/26/2016 2:33 PM, OFWW wrote:
On Thu, 26 May 2016 12:37:00 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote:

On 5/26/2016 11:37 AM, Swingman wrote:
On 5/26/2016 11:25 AM, Leon wrote:

I have a monster cable that originally was sold to me with my
sub-wolfer, and it plugged into the Yamaha receiver/amp.

In our new home the Yamaha sub out is plugged into the wall, on the
opposite side of the room the monster cable is plugged into the wall for
the sub. Moot point at this stage I guess. ;~)

I never bought a Monster cable for audio purposes, only took one
listening session in the studio environment to determine that the
expensive was not justified ... IOW, no bang for the buck.

As I stated in another post, I own a Monster cable "instrument cable",
which I use for my basses ... and often in the studio when a player
being recorded was having problem with hum ... it is right up there with
the best ones I've owned.

Not trying to argue with you here but in most all cases the cable,
Monster or otherwise, are a link between units. Now if you are simply
saying that the Monster instrument cable is better, quality wise, than
what you can find anywhere else, I totally understand and would have to
agree.

My issue with what I used to see was that Monster cables speaker wire
were simply wiring with insulation. It had no ends other than stripped
away insulation. As I recall the cable inside the insulation appeared
to be 1/4" thick. As it exited and was bare wire, but soldered on the
end, it looked like 14 gauge wire. I thought smoke and mirrors. No
doubt it was better than regular home stereo speaker wire but I
seriously doubt any better for the price than lamp cord, which was
probably 8~10 times heavier than speaker wire.

Waaaaaay back when I had 4 relative large home speakers. Each had 12
woofers, mid-range and tweeters and for years I was using regular
speaker wire to power them from a Techniques 85 watt per channel RMS
receiver. That was in the mid 70's to early 90's and it sounded great.
FF to mid 90's and I up graded my receiver to the Yamaha and more watts
RMS to the same wires and speakers. It also sounded great.

BUT then I decided to try out the heaver gauge lamp cord speaker wiring
and WOW that made a heck of a difference. Higher and more crisp highs
for sure.

As far as the bare ended Monster speaker wires go I think you are paying
90% for appearance and maybe 10% improved performance over standard
speaker wire.


As I recall on Monster speaker wires, they also have a higher strand
count than lamp cord, and about the same overall copper diameter than
16 gauge cord.

For me seeing the different colored wire through the clear HD but
flexible insulation was worth it for the speaker wire. The only
problem they haven't found a fix for is to puppy proof the wiring.

On to make the speaker wiring less gaudy.

On 2016-05-27, Swingman wrote:

That perceived value is impossible to determine, even if only one sale
sets the classic definition of market value, except that the market is
constantly in flux due to opinion, false positives, negative negatives,
positive positives, vice versas, verse vice, resulting in what it's
worth today, may not be that tomorrow, subject to seasonal adjustments,
tide tables. climate change, and whatever tomorrow may bring ...

OK, what's the actual abv of the snake oil yer selling?

nb

On 5/26/2016 11:56 AM, Swingman wrote:
On 5/26/2016 9:01 AM, Jack wrote:

You seem to think my personal lack of "discernment" with regards to
Strads vs other quality violins, or your personal ear for this stuff
qualifies either of us to refute what a flock of these folks have
learned?

Just been pointing out that some of remark upon a subject with an
experienced based observation; while others, as you did, must rely on
Google.

Sorry Swing, your experience with this is as close to zero as mine is,
Assuming you never participated in a double blind study with millions of
dollars worth of violins, played and evaluated by the who's who of
violins and numerous students of the art.

You just haven't snapped that Google is both a **** poor replacement for
actual experience, and makes you look naive and foolish at the same time.

You haven't figured out that Google is a valuable resource at your
finger tips? Google provides access to information heretofore
unavailable to the masses w/o much effort and expense. Sorry you only
rely on your personal experiences. I see you wondering around
aimlessly, trying to reinvent the wheel at every turn. Must be tough
being you. I suggest you learn how to use Google, it's RAD, dude.

I'm guessing you have no worthwhile experience in this, your thoughts on
this as far as personal experience is likely as close to zero as mine is.

Feel free to list your qualifications that would convince Claudia Fritz
and Sorbonne University that she should listen to your thoughts rather
that the slew of people she gathered to participate in the study. I'm
thinking (strongly) that you are the fool, not me, not Sorbonne
University, and not the group of top professionals gathered to fairly
evaluate the subject.

Or did you forget this?

On 5/24/2016 6:29 PM, Jack wrote:
I can barely tell a Strad from an electric organ,

No, I didn't forget it. It was meant to stop you from attacking my
comments on someone else's study as if they were based on my personal
experiences. People that actually do have personal experience playing
with Strads and other top of the line violins discovered that their
personal experience turned out to be biased, greatly effected by
hyperbolec acid I spoke of. What's your experience?

Nuff said ...

I'll say.

--
Jack
I can explain it to you, but I can't understand it for you..
http://jbstein.com

On Fri, 27 May 2016 13:21:07 -0400, Jack wrote:

On 5/26/2016 11:56 AM, Swingman wrote:
On 5/26/2016 9:01 AM, Jack wrote:

You seem to think my personal lack of "discernment" with regards to
Strads vs other quality violins, or your personal ear for this stuff
qualifies either of us to refute what a flock of these folks have
learned?

Just been pointing out that some of remark upon a subject with an
experienced based observation; while others, as you did, must rely on
Google.

Sorry Swing, your experience with this is as close to zero as mine is,
Assuming you never participated in a double blind study with millions of
dollars worth of violins, played and evaluated by the who's who of
violins and numerous students of the art.

You just haven't snapped that Google is both a **** poor replacement for
actual experience, and makes you look naive and foolish at the same time.

You haven't figured out that Google is a valuable resource at your
finger tips? Google provides access to information heretofore
unavailable to the masses w/o much effort and expense. Sorry you only
rely on your personal experiences. I see you wondering around
aimlessly, trying to reinvent the wheel at every turn. Must be tough
being you. I suggest you learn how to use Google, it's RAD, dude.

One word: Bonjour!

I'm guessing you have no worthwhile experience in this, your thoughts on
this as far as personal experience is likely as close to zero as mine is.

You're calling Swing a liar? Nice.

Feel free to list your qualifications that would convince Claudia Fritz
and Sorbonne University that she should listen to your thoughts rather
that the slew of people she gathered to participate in the study. I'm
thinking (strongly) that you are the fool, not me, not Sorbonne
University, and not the group of top professionals gathered to fairly
evaluate the subject.

Or did you forget this?

On 5/24/2016 6:29 PM, Jack wrote:
I can barely tell a Strad from an electric organ,

No, I didn't forget it. It was meant to stop you from attacking my
comments on someone else's study as if they were based on my personal
experiences. People that actually do have personal experience playing
with Strads and other top of the line violins discovered that their
personal experience turned out to be biased, greatly effected by
hyperbolec acid I spoke of. What's your experience?

Nuff said ...

I'll say.

On 5/27/2016 6:19 PM, krw wrote:

I'm guessing you have no worthwhile experience in this, your thoughts on
this as far as personal experience is likely as close to zero as mine is.

You're calling Swing a liar? Nice.

He said I look foolish using Google rather than my personal experience.
I said he has no worthwhile experience in this, same as me. The very
next paragraph I offered him the opportunity to state his
qualifications. I didn't call him a liar, ever.

Learn how to read.

"Bonjour!" yourself, idiot!

Feel free to list your qualifications that would convince Claudia Fritz
and Sorbonne University that she should listen to your thoughts rather
that the slew of people she gathered to participate in the study. I'm
thinking (strongly) that you are the fool, not me, not Sorbonne
University, and not the group of top professionals gathered to fairly
evaluate the subject.

--
Jack
Add Life to your Days not Days to your Life.
http://jbstein.com

On 5/28/2016 9:45 AM, Jack wrote:

The very next paragraph I offered him the opportunity to state his
qualifications.

Google is your friend ...

--
eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com
Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net
https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop
https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts
http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/
https://www.facebook.com/eWoodShop-206166666122228
KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious)

On 2016-05-28, Swingman wrote:

Google is your friend ...

Sorry, but Google has long ago ceased being anyone's friend.

nb

On 5/28/2016 10:03 AM, notbob wrote:
On 2016-05-28, Swingman wrote:

Google is your friend ...

Sorry, but Google has long ago ceased being anyone's friend.

Shhhh ... you don't want to hurt a French model's feelings.

--
eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com
Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net
https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop
https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts
http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/
https://www.facebook.com/eWoodShop-206166666122228
KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious)

On Sat, 28 May 2016 10:45:21 -0400, Jack wrote:

On 5/27/2016 6:19 PM, krw wrote:

I'm guessing you have no worthwhile experience in this, your thoughts on
this as far as personal experience is likely as close to zero as mine is.

You're calling Swing a liar? Nice.

He said I look foolish using Google rather than my personal experience.

....and he was right. It's nuts to believe what you see on the
Internet over personal experience.

I said he has no worthwhile experience in this, same as me. The very
next paragraph I offered him the opportunity to state his
qualifications. I didn't call him a liar, ever.

Learn how to read.

I can read just fine.

"Bonjour!" yourself, idiot!

Clueless.

Feel free to list your qualifications that would convince Claudia Fritz
and Sorbonne University that she should listen to your thoughts rather
that the slew of people she gathered to participate in the study. I'm
thinking (strongly) that you are the fool, not me, not Sorbonne
University, and not the group of top professionals gathered to fairly
evaluate the subject.

On 5/28/2016 5:16 PM, krw wrote:
On Sat, 28 May 2016 10:45:21 -0400, Jack wrote:

On 5/27/2016 6:19 PM, krw wrote:

I'm guessing you have no worthwhile experience in this, your thoughts on
this as far as personal experience is likely as close to zero as mine is.

You're calling Swing a liar? Nice.

He said I look foolish using Google rather than my personal experience.

...and he was right. It's nuts to believe what you see on the
Internet over personal experience.

So, you're saying Swing has personal experience evaluating a bunch of
violins in a double blind study, and it's nuts to believe the flock of
professionals gathered to do just that, simply because Google was used
to locate the study reported on the National Geographic web site.

Idiot!

--

Jack

Did you eat an extra bowls of Stupid this morning?

http://jbstein.com

I said he has no worthwhile experience in this, same as me. The very
next paragraph I offered him the opportunity to state his
qualifications. I didn't call him a liar, ever.

Learn how to read.

I can read just fine.

"Bonjour!" yourself, idiot!

Clueless.

Feel free to list your qualifications that would convince Claudia Fritz
and Sorbonne University that she should listen to your thoughts rather
that the slew of people she gathered to participate in the study. I'm
thinking (strongly) that you are the fool, not me, not Sorbonne
University, and not the group of top professionals gathered to fairly
evaluate the subject.

On Sun, 29 May 2016 09:19:03 -0400, Jack wrote:

On 5/28/2016 5:16 PM, krw wrote:
On Sat, 28 May 2016 10:45:21 -0400, Jack wrote:

On 5/27/2016 6:19 PM, krw wrote:

I'm guessing you have no worthwhile experience in this, your thoughts on
this as far as personal experience is likely as close to zero as mine is.

You're calling Swing a liar? Nice.

He said I look foolish using Google rather than my personal experience.

...and he was right. It's nuts to believe what you see on the
Internet over personal experience.

So, you're saying Swing has personal experience evaluating a bunch of
violins in a double blind study, and it's nuts to believe the flock of
professionals gathered to do just that, simply because Google was used
to locate the study reported on the National Geographic web site.

He has more personal experience than your weak Google searches can
possibly come up with, Frenchy.

Idiot!

At least you can admit your deficiencies.

On 5/29/2016 8:19 AM, Jack wrote:

On 5/28/2016 5:16 PM, krw wrote:
On Sat, 28 May 2016 10:45:21 -0400, Jack wrote:

So, you're saying Swing has personal experience evaluating a bunch of
violins in a double blind study,

Pretty much, yes. Specifically "evaluating" the sound of acoustic
instruments for recording was my specialty as a recording
engineer/producer .. about 23+ years worth of exactly that.

And that specifically included many Cremona period instruments - cello,
viola, viola da gamba, violin - for symphonies, Early Music, and
Classical Music ensembles from around the world ... including the
recording of 11 _violin_ books and audio volumes for various artist's
published by Mel Bay publications.

simply because Google was used
to locate the study reported on the National Geographic web site.

Well, we understand you had to do something to fill in the gaps in your
knowledge which you admitted to in your first post, eh?

As long as you're going to rely solely on Google for your knowledge,
might as well get some practice.

Try my name, with some terms like: recording, music, violin, "heights
sound studio", acoustic, cantiga, etc. ... and be sure you mix'em up to
get the full effect.

Can we do the same with your name on the subject of evaluating the sound
of acoustic instruments?

Idiot!

Add ignorant and naive to that, you'd be looking in the mirror.

--
eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com
Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net
https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop
https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts
http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/
https://www.facebook.com/eWoodShop-206166666122228
KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious)

On Sun, 29 May 2016 09:52:02 -0500, Swingman wrote:

Try my name, with some terms like: recording, music, violin, "heights
sound studio", acoustic, cantiga, etc.

https://goo.gl/Qj754t

I will even make it easy for you Jack

On 5/29/2016 4:25 PM, Markem wrote:
On Sun, 29 May 2016 09:52:02 -0500, Swingman wrote:

Try my name, with some terms like: recording, music, violin, "heights
sound studio", acoustic, cantiga, etc.

https://goo.gl/Qj754t

I will even make it easy for you Jack

Thanks, and this will get you a lot more. LOL

https://www.google.com/search?q=karl...louet%22+music

--
eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com
Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net
https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop
https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts
http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/
https://www.facebook.com/eWoodShop-206166666122228
KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious)

On Sun, 29 May 2016 16:39:58 -0500, Swingman wrote:

On 5/29/2016 4:25 PM, Markem wrote:
On Sun, 29 May 2016 09:52:02 -0500, Swingman wrote:

Try my name, with some terms like: recording, music, violin, "heights
sound studio", acoustic, cantiga, etc.

https://goo.gl/Qj754t

I will even make it easy for you Jack

Thanks, and this will get you a lot more. LOL

https://www.google.com/search?q=karl...louet%22+music

ROTFL~ Found this in your listings,...
"Did you know Karl Caillouet's criminal history is searchable?"

On another note, quite an amazing Family, My condolences on those that
are gone from us.

On 5/29/2016 4:25 PM, Markem wrote:
On Sun, 29 May 2016 09:52:02 -0500, Swingman wrote:

Try my name, with some terms like: recording, music, violin, "heights
sound studio", acoustic, cantiga, etc.

http://i.imgur.com/k5tVM84.jpg

I will even make it easy for you Jack

FIFY ...


| |
|Markem|
|______|_ _ _ _ o ( )OO)()(()))
/ __ \ \ \ \ o OO )OoOOo)()()
| / \-\ | | | |-----OoO))()(
|(o | | | | | Karl O00)
| \__/-/ / / / /------Oooo()
\_____|__/_/_/_/ ( /
\____\____/

http://i.imgur.com/k5tVM84.jpg

On Mon, 30 May 2016 06:13:40 -0500, "Fred Parrott"
wrote: nothing of real substance

So you replace the link with your own, makes one wonder as to how you
Mr. Parrot was raised?

On 5/29/2016 4:25 PM, Markem wrote:
On Sun, 29 May 2016 09:52:02 -0500, Swingman wrote:

Try my name, with some terms like: recording, music, violin, "heights
sound studio", acoustic, cantiga, etc.

http://i.imgur.com/k5tVM84.jpg

I will even make it easy for you Jack

FIFY ...


| |
|Markem|
|______|_ _ _ _ o ( )OO)()(()))
/ __ \ \ \ \ o OO )OoOOo)()()
| / \-\ | | | |-----OoO))()(
|(o | | | | | Karl O00)
| \__/-/ / / / /------Oooo()
\_____|__/_/_/_/ ( /
\____\____/

http://i.imgur.com/k5tVM84.jpg

On 5/29/2016 11:51 PM, OFWW wrote:

ROTFL~ Found this in your listings,...
"Did you know Karl Caillouet's criminal history is searchable?"

Save your money.
It'll just make you wonder how they make any money at all. LOL

--
eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com
Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net
https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop
https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts
http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/
https://www.facebook.com/eWoodShop-206166666122228
KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious)

On 5/30/2016 7:27 AM, Markem wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 06:13:40 -0500, "Fred Parrott"
wrote: nothing of real substance

So you replace the link with your own, makes one wonder as to how you
Mr. Parrot was raised?

I find it more than coincidental that certain posters disappear when
sock puppets appear and visa versa.

On 5/30/2016 6:13 AM, Fred Parrott wrote:

FIFY ...

Don't care who you are, that there was funny.

--
eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com
Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net
https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop
https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts
http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/
https://www.facebook.com/eWoodShop-206166666122228
KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious)

On Monday, May 30, 2016 at 9:59:22 AM UTC-4, Swingman wrote:
On 5/29/2016 11:51 PM, OFWW wrote:

ROTFL~ Found this in your listings,...
"Did you know Karl Caillouet's criminal history is searchable?"

Save your money.
It'll just make you wonder how they make any money at all. LOL


Let's be honest. The only reason we can't find a criminal record for
you is because you paid this guy to remove all traces. (This is an
actual copy/paste from the ole interweb)

"Experienced hacker offering his services
Legal or the other way Hacking and social engineering is my business
for some decade now never had a real job so i had the time

I made a good amount of money last 20 years
I have worked for other people before now im also offering my
services for everyone with enough cash here

Prices
Im not doing this to make a few bucks here and there im not
from some crappy eastern europe country and happy to scam

people for 50 euro
Im a proffessional computer expert who could earn 50 100 euro
an hour with a legal job
So stop reading if you dont have a serious problem worth spending
some cash at

Technical skills
Web HTML PHP SQL APACHE
Assembler Delphi
0day Exploits Highly personalized trojans Bots DDOS
Spear Phishing Attacks to get accounts from selected account
Alot of experience with security practices inside big corporations

What we do
We hack something technically
Causing alot of technical trouble on websites networks to
disrupt their service with DDOS and other methods.
Getting private information from other
Changing of grades. SAT university grades and so on
Defacing a website and removing bad blogs or post
We also Wire money to bank accounts
Erasing your name from government website
whatever you like

You can contact me on (email and phone was provided but snipped)"

On 5/30/2016 9:50 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:

Let's be honest. The only reason we can't find a criminal record for
you is because you paid this guy to remove all traces. (This is an
actual copy/paste from the ole interweb)

"Experienced hacker offering his services
Legal or the other way Hacking and social engineering is my business
for some decade now never had a real job so i had the time ..."

Yep, our resident sock puppet/script kiddie's resume.

--
eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com
Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net
https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop
https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts
http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/
https://www.facebook.com/eWoodShop-206166666122228
KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious)

On Mon, 30 May 2016 09:25:04 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote:

On 5/30/2016 7:27 AM, Markem wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 06:13:40 -0500, "Fred Parrott"
wrote: nothing of real substance

So you replace the link with your own, makes one wonder as to how you
Mr. Parrot was raised?

I find it more than coincidental that certain posters disappear when
sock puppets appear and visa versa.

As trolls they seem to be rather pathetic. Someone seems to have a
problem with you and Karl from the past. To bad they are just dying,
not living.

On 5/30/2016 10:56 AM, Markem wrote:

As trolls they seem to be rather pathetic. Someone seems to have a
problem with you and Karl from the past. To bad they are just dying,
not living.

Price of fame, fortune ... and festool.

--
eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com
Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net
https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop
https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts
http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/
https://www.facebook.com/eWoodShop-206166666122228
KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious)

On 5/30/2016 10:56 AM, Markem wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 09:25:04 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote:

On 5/30/2016 7:27 AM, Markem wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 06:13:40 -0500, "Fred Parrott"
wrote: nothing of real substance

So you replace the link with your own, makes one wonder as to how you
Mr. Parrot was raised?

I find it more than coincidental that certain posters disappear when
sock puppets appear and visa versa.

As trolls they seem to be rather pathetic. Someone seems to have a
problem with you and Karl from the past. To bad they are just dying,
not living.




While their names change the personalities are the same.

On 5/30/2016 9:25 AM,, Leon wrote:
On 5/30/2016 7:27 AM, Markem wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 06:13:40 -0500, "Fred Parrott"
wrote: nothing of real substance

So you replace the link with your own, makes one wonder as to how you
Mr. Parrot was raised?

I find it more than coincidental that certain posters disappear when
sock puppets appear and visa versa.

We find it more than coincidental that both you and Karl replied
through Giganews from the same IP, from the same computer running
Windows 7 using Thunderbird 45.1.0, exactly 3 minutes apart.

In fact, it transcends coincidental and is just downright GAY!
(Which one of you girls made breakfast this AM? )

On Mon, 30 May 2016 11:52:51 -0500, "Fred Parrott"
wrote:

On 5/30/2016 9:25 AM,, Leon wrote:
On 5/30/2016 7:27 AM, Markem wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 06:13:40 -0500, "Fred Parrott"
wrote: nothing of real substance

So you replace the link with your own, makes one wonder as to how you
Mr. Parrot was raised?

I find it more than coincidental that certain posters disappear when
sock puppets appear and visa versa.

We find it more than coincidental that both you and Karl replied
through Giganews from the same IP, from the same computer running
Windows 7 using Thunderbird 45.1.0, exactly 3 minutes apart.

In fact, it transcends coincidental and is just downright GAY!
(Which one of you girls made breakfast this AM? )

Your netcopping skills are seriously lacking, I use Win 7 Pro and use
Forte Agent 7. Either that or you are seriously impaired with mind
altering substances.

On 5/30/2016 12:23 PM, Markem wrote:

Your netcopping skills are seriously lacking, I use Win 7 Pro and use
Forte Agent 7.

Better keep his day job, if he has one. Appears our script kiddie can't
even read an nntp header.

--
eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com
Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net
https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop
https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts
http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/
https://www.facebook.com/eWoodShop-206166666122228
KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious)

On Mon, 30 May 2016 12:46:33 -0500, Swingman wrote:

Swingman header

Path: buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.gig anews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 12:46:34 -0500
Subject: log harvesting from lake bottoms
Newsgroups: rec.woodworking
References:







From: Swingman
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 12:46:33 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID:
Lines: 16
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-eqshJWcGSizn2Mbt0z19I1drcxVBHzrAPvnmanHPe7WTj65pcI S1oYUWS+FAPSK0Ah0ZGtNEo8cPSql!yXphKdcmsiw2md2k7gcq 6CB2e0/1elI4WPUgoJcKb3/2i7p8uKpn6ug+DGEMN4NJg58kEhlebUQk
X-Complaints-To:
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2159
Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com rec.woodworking:1589205

My Header

Path:
buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.gig anews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 12:23:20 -0500
From: Markem
Newsgroups: rec.woodworking
Subject: log harvesting from lake bottoms
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 12:23:50 -0500
Message-ID:
References:











User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 24
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace:
sv3-13LtIPZHiJ3vhdWv329fQydxuPxgr9Teds2wWdWFT87q8ZwLPK yYP1Nih+dwz1OzkXejr7svrCokP77!PP/sDa0EwOAjW0zUWoJIFoG6VY8piXTHtngWIi6FMpx55CXG6URfp KBbtXeXhODXnASqnw==
X-Complaints-To:
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2436
Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com rec.woodworking:1589204

On Mon, 30 May 2016 12:46:33 -0500, Swingman wrote:

On 5/30/2016 12:23 PM, Markem wrote:

Your netcopping skills are seriously lacking, I use Win 7 Pro and use
Forte Agent 7.

Better keep his day job, if he has one. Appears our script kiddie can't
even read an nntp header.

If you all were closer I think you and Leon might have redone my
kitchen by now. But southern Illinois is not even close to Houston.

On 5/30/2016 12:23 PM, Markem wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 11:52:51 -0500, "Fred Parrott"
wrote:

On 5/30/2016 9:25 AM,, Leon wrote:
On 5/30/2016 7:27 AM, Markem wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 06:13:40 -0500, "Fred Parrott"
wrote: nothing of real substance

So you replace the link with your own, makes one wonder as to how you
Mr. Parrot was raised?

I find it more than coincidental that certain posters disappear when
sock puppets appear and visa versa.

We find it more than coincidental that both you and Karl replied
through Giganews from the same IP, from the same computer running
Windows 7 using Thunderbird 45.1.0, exactly 3 minutes apart.

In fact, it transcends coincidental and is just downright GAY!
(Which one of you girls made breakfast this AM? )

Your netcopping skills are seriously lacking, I use Win 7 Pro and use
Forte Agent 7. Either that or you are seriously impaired with mind
altering substances.

Perhaps if you could actually comprehend a THREADED Usenet
discussion you'd understand what a ignorant puddle of ****-drippings
you just proved yourself to be.

(FREE KLUE: I was replying to Leon )

On Mon, 30 May 2016 13:37:29 -0500, "Fred Parrott"
wrote:

On 5/30/2016 12:23 PM, Markem wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 11:52:51 -0500, "Fred Parrott"
wrote:

On 5/30/2016 9:25 AM,, Leon wrote:
On 5/30/2016 7:27 AM, Markem wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 06:13:40 -0500, "Fred Parrott"
wrote: nothing of real substance

So you replace the link with your own, makes one wonder as to how you
Mr. Parrot was raised?

I find it more than coincidental that certain posters disappear when
sock puppets appear and visa versa.

We find it more than coincidental that both you and Karl replied
through Giganews from the same IP, from the same computer running
Windows 7 using Thunderbird 45.1.0, exactly 3 minutes apart.

In fact, it transcends coincidental and is just downright GAY!
(Which one of you girls made breakfast this AM? )

Your netcopping skills are seriously lacking, I use Win 7 Pro and use
Forte Agent 7. Either that or you are seriously impaired with mind
altering substances.

Perhaps if you could actually comprehend a THREADED Usenet
discussion you'd understand what a ignorant puddle of ****-drippings
you just proved yourself to be.

(FREE KLUE: I was replying to Leon )

Should that not free glue as that seems to be what you are sniffing.
So we have now confirmed the mind altering substances!

On 5/30/2016 12:54 PM, Markem wrote:

If you all were closer I think you and Leon and myself might have a
hot gay threesome. But southern Illinois is not even close to Houston.

FIFY ...

http://lemonparty.org


| |
|Markem|
|______|_ _ _ _ o ( )OO)()(()))
/ __ \ \ \ \ o OO )OoOOo)()()
| / \-\ | | | |-----OoO))()(
|(o | | | | | Karl O00)
| \__/-/ / / / /------Oooo()
\_____|__/_/_/_/ ( /
\____\____/

On Mon, 30 May 2016 14:25:01 -0500, "Fred Parrott"
wrote:
If you all were closer I think you and Leon and myself might have a
hot gay threesome.

On 5/30/2016 12:52 PM, Fred Parrott wrote:
On 5/30/2016 9:25 AM,, Leon wrote:
On 5/30/2016 7:27 AM, Markem wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 06:13:40 -0500, "Fred Parrott"
wrote: nothing of real substance

So you replace the link with your own, makes one wonder as to how you
Mr. Parrot was raised?

I find it more than coincidental that certain posters disappear when
sock puppets appear and visa versa.

We find it more than coincidental that both you and Karl replied
through Giganews from the same IP, from the same computer running
Windows 7 using Thunderbird 45.1.0, exactly 3 minutes apart.

In fact, it transcends coincidental and is just downright GAY!
(Which one of you girls made breakfast this AM? )




I find it strange that anyone cares enough to actually check that out.

On Mon, 30 May 2016 16:33:17 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:

On 5/30/2016 12:52 PM, Fred Parrott wrote:
On 5/30/2016 9:25 AM,, Leon wrote:
On 5/30/2016 7:27 AM, Markem wrote:
On Mon, 30 May 2016 06:13:40 -0500, "Fred Parrott"
wrote: nothing of real substance

So you replace the link with your own, makes one wonder as to how you
Mr. Parrot was raised?

I find it more than coincidental that certain posters disappear when
sock puppets appear and visa versa.

We find it more than coincidental that both you and Karl replied
through Giganews from the same IP, from the same computer running
Windows 7 using Thunderbird 45.1.0, exactly 3 minutes apart.

In fact, it transcends coincidental and is just downright GAY!
(Which one of you girls made breakfast this AM? )




I find it strange that anyone cares enough to actually check that out.

Or make the obvious, provable, lie.

Fred Parrott wrote:
On 5/30/2016 12:54 PM, Markem wrote:

If you all were closer I think you and Leon and myself might have a
hot gay threesome. But southern Illinois is not even close to Houston.

FIFY ...

http://lemonparty.org


You are sick - go away.


--
-Mike-

On 5/30/2016 5:41 PM, Mike Marlow wrote:
Fred Parrott wrote:
On 5/30/2016 12:54 PM, Markem wrote:

If you all were closer I think you and Leon and myself might have a
hot gay threesome. But southern Illinois is not even close to Houston.

FIFY ...

http://lemonparty.org


You are sick - go away.

Now, now, Mike ... just think of the educational opportunities.

Here we thought dodo birds were extinct ... now we see irrefutable proof
that at least one mated with an illiterate parrot within the last ten years.

--
eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com
Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net
https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop
https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts
http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/
https://www.facebook.com/eWoodShop-206166666122228
KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious)

Swingman wrote:
On 5/30/2016 5:41 PM, Mike Marlow wrote:
Fred Parrott wrote:
On 5/30/2016 12:54 PM, Markem wrote:

If you all were closer I think you and Leon and myself might have a
hot gay threesome. But southern Illinois is not even close to Houston.

FIFY ...

http://lemonparty.org


You are sick - go away.

Now, now, Mike ... just think of the educational opportunities.

Here we thought dodo birds were extinct ... now we see irrefutable proof
that at least one mated with an illiterate parrot within the last ten
years.


Indeed!

--
-Mike-