Brian Reay wrote:
Pamela wrote:
On 14:39 29 Apr 2020, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 13:32:58 on Wed,
29 Apr 2020, Pamela remarked:

Is there any information in the headers of a post to ULM to indicate which
moderator approved it?

I don't think so. Nor is there a public audit trail for which moderator
rejected a posting.

I bet that can lead to some inter-mod disagreement!

Why?

Ive run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators. There
has never been a disagreement over another moderators decision. Not many
posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid reason. The same
goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women in
working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

--
M0TEY // STC // #SaveOurNHS

On 01/05/2020 09:32, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote:
Pamela wrote:
On 14:39 29 Apr 2020, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 13:32:58 on Wed,
29 Apr 2020, Pamela remarked:

Is there any information in the headers of a post to ULM to indicate which
moderator approved it?

I don't think so. Nor is there a public audit trail for which moderator
rejected a posting.

I bet that can lead to some inter-mod disagreement!

Why?

Ive run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators. There
has never been a disagreement over another moderators decision. Not many
posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid reason. The same
goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women in
working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?


I was wondering about that comment, seemed so totally random.

--
kat
^..^

On Fri, 1 May 2020 08:32:02 -0000 (UTC), Stephen Cole
wrote:

Brian Reay wrote:
Pamela wrote:
On 14:39 29 Apr 2020, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 13:32:58 on Wed,
29 Apr 2020, Pamela remarked:

Is there any information in the headers of a post to ULM to indicate which
moderator approved it?

I don't think so. Nor is there a public audit trail for which moderator
rejected a posting.

I bet that can lead to some inter-mod disagreement!

Why?

I’ve run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators. There
has never been a disagreement over another moderator’s decision. Not many
posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid reason. The same
goes for two other groups I moderate.

Posts might not be rejected but individuals who disagree with your
views most certainly are.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women in
working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

He's lashing out in all directions...been wound up big time I reckon.

On 01/05/2020 09:32:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote:
Pamela wrote:
On 14:39 29 Apr 2020, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 13:32:58 on Wed,
29 Apr 2020, Pamela remarked:

Is there any information in the headers of a post to ULM to indicate which
moderator approved it?

I don't think so. Nor is there a public audit trail for which moderator
rejected a posting.

I bet that can lead to some inter-mod disagreement!

Why?

Ive run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators. There
has never been a disagreement over another moderators decision. Not many
posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid reason. The same
goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women in
working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

How many hairdressers do you know?

Fredxx wrote:
On 01/05/2020 09:32:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote:
Pamela wrote:
On 14:39 29 Apr 2020, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 13:32:58 on Wed,
29 Apr 2020, Pamela remarked:

Is there any information in the headers of a post to ULM to indicate which
moderator approved it?

I don't think so. Nor is there a public audit trail for which moderator
rejected a posting.

I bet that can lead to some inter-mod disagreement!

Why?

Ive run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators. There
has never been a disagreement over another moderators decision. Not many
posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid reason. The same
goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women in
working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

How many hairdressers do you know?

Off the top of my head, three or four.

HTH.

--
M0TEY // STC // #SaveOurNHS

In article ,
Stephen Cole wrote:
I‘ve run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators.
There has never been a disagreement over another moderator‘s decision.
Not many posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid
reason. The same goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women
in working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

I'd guess the sort of group Reay would be allowed to moderate excludes all
sorts of people from the start. All non whites and women would be likely.

--
*Remember not to forget that which you do not need to know.*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

On 01/05/2020 11:51:34, Stephen Cole wrote:
Fredxx wrote:
On 01/05/2020 09:32:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote:
Pamela wrote:
On 14:39 29 Apr 2020, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 13:32:58 on Wed,
29 Apr 2020, Pamela remarked:

Is there any information in the headers of a post to ULM to indicate which
moderator approved it?

I don't think so. Nor is there a public audit trail for which moderator
rejected a posting.

I bet that can lead to some inter-mod disagreement!

Why?

Ive run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators. There
has never been a disagreement over another moderators decision. Not many
posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid reason. The same
goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women in
working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

How many hairdressers do you know?

Off the top of my head, three or four.

So you have probably never seen 3 or 4 in one space.

The closest you might get is a hen do, but without the drink.

Dave Plowman (News) wrote:

In article ,
Stephen Cole wrote:
I¼ve run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators.
There has never been a disagreement over another moderator¼s decision.
Not many posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid
reason. The same goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women
in working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

I'd guess the sort of group Reay would be allowed to moderate excludes all
sorts of people from the start. All non whites and women would be likely.

Seeing it's an amateur radio group, that's a given.

--

Roger Hayter

Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Stephen Cole wrote:
I‘ve run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators.
There has never been a disagreement over another moderator‘s decision.
Not many posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid
reason. The same goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women
in working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

I'd guess the sort of group Reay would be allowed to moderate excludes all
sorts of people from the start. All non whites and women would be likely.


There have been a *lot* of problems with his group. If you fancy boggling
your mind, google €œRSGBTech€�.

--
M0TEY // STC // #SaveOurNHS

On 01/05/2020 11:51, Stephen Cole wrote:
Fredxx wrote:
On 01/05/2020 09:32:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote:
Pamela wrote:
On 14:39 29 Apr 2020, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 13:32:58 on Wed,
29 Apr 2020, Pamela remarked:

Is there any information in the headers of a post to ULM to indicate which
moderator approved it?

I don't think so. Nor is there a public audit trail for which moderator
rejected a posting.

I bet that can lead to some inter-mod disagreement!

Why?

Ive run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators. There
has never been a disagreement over another moderators decision. Not many
posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid reason. The same
goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women in
working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

How many hairdressers do you know?

Off the top of my head, three or four.

HTH.

"of the top of my head"...ha ha ha ha

Bobbie and Graeme shut down so I bought a flowbee substitute the
robocut.....

On 01/05/2020 13:28, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Stephen Cole wrote:
I€˜ve run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators.
There has never been a disagreement over another moderator€˜s decision.
Not many posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid
reason. The same goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women
in working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

I'd guess the sort of group Reay would be allowed to moderate excludes all
sorts of people from the start. All non whites and women would be likely.

but like ther masons then .....

On Fri, 1 May 2020 10:51:34 -0000 (UTC), Stephen Cole
wrote:

Fredxx wrote:
On 01/05/2020 09:32:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote:
Pamela wrote:
On 14:39 29 Apr 2020, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 13:32:58 on Wed,
29 Apr 2020, Pamela remarked:

Is there any information in the headers of a post to ULM to indicate which
moderator approved it?

I don't think so. Nor is there a public audit trail for which moderator
rejected a posting.

I bet that can lead to some inter-mod disagreement!

Why?

I’ve run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators. There
has never been a disagreement over another moderator’s decision. Not many
posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid reason. The same
goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women in
working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

How many hairdressers do you know?

Off the top of my head, three or four.

HTH.

Gonna be fun when 30 Million women all try to get appointments after
the lock down!

On Fri, 01 May 2020 13:28:56 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote:

In article ,
Stephen Cole wrote:
I‘ve run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators.
There has never been a disagreement over another moderator‘s decision.
Not many posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid
reason. The same goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women
in working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

I'd guess the sort of group Reay would be allowed to moderate excludes all
sorts of people from the start. All non whites and women would be likely.

And anybody who dares to disgree with him.... which is virtually
every-one....

On 01/05/2020 15:11, Rambo wrote:
On Fri, 01 May 2020 13:28:56 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote:

In article ,
Stephen Cole wrote:
I€˜ve run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators.
There has never been a disagreement over another moderator€˜s decision.
Not many posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid
reason. The same goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women
in working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

I'd guess the sort of group Reay would be allowed to moderate excludes all
sorts of people from the start. All non whites and women would be likely.

And anybody who dares to disgree with him.... which is virtually
every-one....

I tried being nice to him...doesn't work ....

Rambo wrote:
On Fri, 1 May 2020 10:51:34 -0000 (UTC), Stephen Cole
wrote:

Fredxx wrote:
On 01/05/2020 09:32:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote:
Pamela wrote:
On 14:39 29 Apr 2020, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 13:32:58 on Wed,
29 Apr 2020, Pamela remarked:

Is there any information in the headers of a post to ULM to indicate which
moderator approved it?

I don't think so. Nor is there a public audit trail for which moderator
rejected a posting.

I bet that can lead to some inter-mod disagreement!

Why?

IÂ’ve run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators. There
has never been a disagreement over another moderatorÂ’s decision. Not many
posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid reason. The same
goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women in
working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

How many hairdressers do you know?

Off the top of my head, three or four.

HTH.

Gonna be fun when 30 Million women all try to get appointments after
the lock down!

Ill be heading straight to the barbers myself, havent had a haircut since
the end of February and its looking tatty now!

--
M0TEY // STC // #SaveOurNHS

On Fri, 1 May 2020 15:19:12 -0000 (UTC), Stephen Cole
wrote:

Rambo wrote:
On Fri, 1 May 2020 10:51:34 -0000 (UTC), Stephen Cole
wrote:

Fredxx wrote:
On 01/05/2020 09:32:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote:
Pamela wrote:
On 14:39 29 Apr 2020, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 13:32:58 on Wed,
29 Apr 2020, Pamela remarked:

Is there any information in the headers of a post to ULM to indicate which
moderator approved it?

I don't think so. Nor is there a public audit trail for which moderator
rejected a posting.

I bet that can lead to some inter-mod disagreement!

Why?

I?ve run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators. There
has never been a disagreement over another moderator?s decision. Not many
posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid reason. The same
goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women in
working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

How many hairdressers do you know?

Off the top of my head, three or four.

HTH.

Gonna be fun when 30 Million women all try to get appointments after
the lock down!

I’ll be heading straight to the barbers myself, haven’t had a haircut since
the end of February and it’s looking tatty now!

Yep same here.

Hope I don't get faced by my worst nightmare...a ponytail!

In message , Rambo
writes
On Fri, 1 May 2020 15:19:12 -0000 (UTC), Stephen Cole
wrote:

Rambo wrote:
On Fri, 1 May 2020 10:51:34 -0000 (UTC), Stephen Cole
wrote:

Fredxx wrote:
On 01/05/2020 09:32:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote:
Pamela wrote:
On 14:39 29 Apr 2020, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 13:32:58 on Wed,
29 Apr 2020, Pamela remarked:

Is there any information in the headers of a post to ULM to
indicate which
moderator approved it?

I don't think so. Nor is there a public audit trail for which
moderator
rejected a posting.

I bet that can lead to some inter-mod disagreement!

Why?

I?ve run run a group for over 10 years which has several
moderators. There
has never been a disagreement over another moderator?s decision.
Not many
posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid reason.
same
goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women in
working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

How many hairdressers do you know?

Off the top of my head, three or four.

HTH.

Gonna be fun when 30 Million women all try to get appointments after
the lock down!

Ill be heading straight to the barbers myself, havent had a haircut since
the end of February and its looking tatty now!

Yep same here.

Hope I don't get faced by my worst nightmare...a ponytail!

I'm aiming for a man bun aka a topknot.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5Ou8H8HGfM

Brian
--
Brian Howie

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

In message , Rambo
writes
On Fri, 1 May 2020 15:19:12 -0000 (UTC), Stephen Cole
wrote:

Rambo wrote:
On Fri, 1 May 2020 10:51:34 -0000 (UTC), Stephen Cole
wrote:

Fredxx wrote:
On 01/05/2020 09:32:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote:
Pamela wrote:
On 14:39 29 Apr 2020, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 13:32:58 on Wed,
29 Apr 2020, Pamela remarked:

Is there any information in the headers of a post to ULM to
indicate which
moderator approved it?

I don't think so. Nor is there a public audit trail for which
moderator
rejected a posting.

I bet that can lead to some inter-mod disagreement!

Why?

I?ve run run a group for over 10 years which has several
moderators. There
has never been a disagreement over another moderator?s decision.
Not many
posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid reason.
same
goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women in
working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

How many hairdressers do you know?

Off the top of my head, three or four.

HTH.

Gonna be fun when 30 Million women all try to get appointments after
the lock down!

Ill be heading straight to the barbers myself, havent had a haircut since
the end of February and its looking tatty now!

Yep same here.

Hope I don't get faced by my worst nightmare...a ponytail!

I'm aiming for a man bun.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5Ou8H8HGfM

Brian
--
Brian Howie

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

brian wrote:
In message , Rambo
writes
On Fri, 1 May 2020 15:19:12 -0000 (UTC), Stephen Cole
wrote:

Rambo wrote:
On Fri, 1 May 2020 10:51:34 -0000 (UTC), Stephen Cole
wrote:

Fredxx wrote:
On 01/05/2020 09:32:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote:
Pamela wrote:
On 14:39 29 Apr 2020, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 13:32:58 on Wed,
29 Apr 2020, Pamela remarked:

Is there any information in the headers of a post to ULM to
indicate which
moderator approved it?

I don't think so. Nor is there a public audit trail for which
moderator
rejected a posting.

I bet that can lead to some inter-mod disagreement!

Why?

I?ve run run a group for over 10 years which has several
moderators. There
has never been a disagreement over another moderator?s decision.
Not many
posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid reason.
same
goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women in
working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

How many hairdressers do you know?

Off the top of my head, three or four.

HTH.

Gonna be fun when 30 Million women all try to get appointments after
the lock down!

Ill be heading straight to the barbers myself, havent had a haircut since
the end of February and its looking tatty now!

Yep same here.

Hope I don't get faced by my worst nightmare...a ponytail!

I'm aiming for a man bun aka a topknot.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5Ou8H8HGfM


You should go for pigtails and really freak the family out.

--
M0TEY // STC // #SaveOurNHS

"Roger Hayter" wrote in message
...
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:

In article ,
Stephen Cole wrote:
I¼ve run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators.
There has never been a disagreement over another moderator¼s
decision.
Not many posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid
reason. The same goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women
in working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

I'd guess the sort of group Reay would be allowed to moderate excludes
all
sorts of people from the start. All non whites and women would be likely.

Seeing it's an amateur radio group, that's a given.

At least one woman in our. Not sure if you consider Italians as non whites
or not.

On Sat, 2 May 2020 04:35:38 +1000, Joshua Snow, better known as cantankerous
trolling senile geezer Rodent Speed, wrote:

FLUSH the trolling senile asshole's latest troll**** unread

--
Bod addressing senile Rot:
"Rod, you have a sick twisted mind. I suggest you stop your mindless
and totally irresponsible talk. Your mouth could get you into a lot of
trouble."
Message-ID:

Joshua Snow wrote:


"Roger Hayter" wrote in message
...
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:

In article ,
Stephen Cole wrote:
IÅ’ve run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators.
There has never been a disagreement over another moderatorÅ’s
decision.
Not many posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid
reason. The same goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women
in working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

I'd guess the sort of group Reay would be allowed to moderate excludes
all
sorts of people from the start. All non whites and women would be likely.

Seeing it's an amateur radio group, that's a given.

At least one woman in our. Not sure if you consider Italians as non whites
or not.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=S3yon2GyoiM

Probably the last decent bit of acting Dennis Hopper did, that film.

--
M0TEY // STC // #SaveOurNHS

Stephen Cole wrote:

Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Stephen Cole wrote:
I?ve run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators.
There has never been a disagreement over another moderator?s decision.
Not many posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid
reason. The same goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women
in working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

I'd guess the sort of group Reay would be allowed to moderate excludes all
sorts of people from the start. All non whites and women would be likely.


There have been a *lot* of problems with his group. If you fancy boggling
your mind, google "RSGBTech".

OTOH, up till recently it seems to have brought its moderators nothing
but pure, megalomaniacal pleasure.


--

Roger Hayter

Roger Hayter wrote:
Stephen Cole wrote:

Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Stephen Cole wrote:
I?ve run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators.
There has never been a disagreement over another moderator?s decision.
Not many posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid
reason. The same goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women
in working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

I'd guess the sort of group Reay would be allowed to moderate excludes all
sorts of people from the start. All non whites and women would be likely.


There have been a *lot* of problems with his group. If you fancy boggling
your mind, google "RSGBTech".

OTOH, up till recently it seems to have brought its moderators nothing
but pure, megalomaniacal pleasure.

Oh, absolutely. I meant it had caused a lot of problems for everybody other
than the groups moderators.

--
M0TEY // STC // #SaveOurNHS

On 01/05/2020 10:39, Pamela wrote:
On 10:14 1 May 2020, kat said:

On 01/05/2020 09:32, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote:

e.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women
in working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?


I was wondering about that comment, seemed so totally random.

I find it strange.

Maybe Brian is simmering after I've put him right him in other arguments, so
he resorts to pointed jibes. Still seems strange that they're so random.

You and I have had our differences but we don't resort to a guerilla war of
needless insults. Very disappointing.



Could never see the point of them!
--
kat
^..^

On 01/05/2020 11:51, Stephen Cole wrote:
Fredxx wrote:
On 01/05/2020 09:32:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote:
Pamela wrote:
On 14:39 29 Apr 2020, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 13:32:58 on Wed,
29 Apr 2020, Pamela remarked:

Is there any information in the headers of a post to ULM to indicate which
moderator approved it?

I don't think so. Nor is there a public audit trail for which moderator
rejected a posting.

I bet that can lead to some inter-mod disagreement!

Why?

Ive run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators. There
has never been a disagreement over another moderators decision. Not many
posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid reason. The same
goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women in
working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

How many hairdressers do you know?

Off the top of my head, three or four.

HTH.


I know quite a few, and it has to be said, it is true, not everyone behaves like
women working in hairdressers. Some people seem incapable of being that
pleasant and polite. Some even seem to make up really weird insults.

--
kat
^..^

kat wrote:
On 01/05/2020 09:32, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote:
Pamela wrote:
On 14:39 29 Apr 2020, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 13:32:58 on Wed,
29 Apr 2020, Pamela remarked:

Is there any information in the headers of a post to ULM to indicate which
moderator approved it?

I don't think so. Nor is there a public audit trail for which moderator
rejected a posting.

I bet that can lead to some inter-mod disagreement!

Why?

Ive run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators. There
has never been a disagreement over another moderators decision. Not many
posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid reason. The same
goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women in
working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?


I was wondering about that comment, seemed so totally random.


Brian has a long history of such attacks on people and professions that he
perceives as €œlower class€�.

--
M0TEY // STC // #SaveOurNHS

kat wrote:
On 01/05/2020 11:51, Stephen Cole wrote:
Fredxx wrote:
On 01/05/2020 09:32:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote:
Pamela wrote:
On 14:39 29 Apr 2020, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 13:32:58 on Wed,
29 Apr 2020, Pamela remarked:

Is there any information in the headers of a post to ULM to indicate which
moderator approved it?

I don't think so. Nor is there a public audit trail for which moderator
rejected a posting.

I bet that can lead to some inter-mod disagreement!

Why?

Ive run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators. There
has never been a disagreement over another moderators decision. Not many
posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid reason. The same
goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women in
working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

How many hairdressers do you know?

Off the top of my head, three or four.

HTH.


I know quite a few, and it has to be said, it is true, not everyone behaves like
women working in hairdressers. Some people seem incapable of being that
pleasant and polite. Some even seem to make up really weird insults.


I have my hair and beard cut at a Turkish barbershop and the guys in there
have always been very pleasant to chat to.

--
M0TEY // STC // #SaveOurNHS

On 02/05/2020 14:35, Stephen Cole wrote:
kat wrote:
On 01/05/2020 11:51, Stephen Cole wrote:
Fredxx wrote:
On 01/05/2020 09:32:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote:
Pamela wrote:
On 14:39 29 Apr 2020, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 13:32:58 on Wed,
29 Apr 2020, Pamela remarked:

Is there any information in the headers of a post to ULM to indicate which
moderator approved it?

I don't think so. Nor is there a public audit trail for which moderator
rejected a posting.

I bet that can lead to some inter-mod disagreement!

Why?

Ive run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators. There
has never been a disagreement over another moderators decision. Not many
posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid reason. The same
goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women in
working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

How many hairdressers do you know?

Off the top of my head, three or four.

HTH.


I know quite a few, and it has to be said, it is true, not everyone behaves like
women working in hairdressers. Some people seem incapable of being that
pleasant and polite. Some even seem to make up really weird insults.


I have my hair and beard cut at a Turkish barbershop and the guys in there
have always been very pleasant to chat to.


I have never been in a barber's shop, Turkish or otherwise, but there is one
near where I live that always looks busy so I assume the staff are friendly. So
too are the staff in the women's hairdresser's.


--
kat
^..^

On Sat, 2 May 2020 13:35:38 -0000 (UTC), Stephen Cole
wrote:

kat wrote:
On 01/05/2020 11:51, Stephen Cole wrote:
Fredxx wrote:
On 01/05/2020 09:32:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote:
Pamela wrote:
On 14:39 29 Apr 2020, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 13:32:58 on Wed,
29 Apr 2020, Pamela remarked:

Is there any information in the headers of a post to ULM to indicate which
moderator approved it?

I don't think so. Nor is there a public audit trail for which moderator
rejected a posting.

I bet that can lead to some inter-mod disagreement!

Why?

I’ve run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators. There
has never been a disagreement over another moderator’s decision. Not many
posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid reason. The same
goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women in
working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

How many hairdressers do you know?

Off the top of my head, three or four.

HTH.


I know quite a few, and it has to be said, it is true, not everyone behaves like
women working in hairdressers. Some people seem incapable of being that
pleasant and polite. Some even seem to make up really weird insults.


I have my hair and beard cut at a Turkish barbershop and the guys in there
have always been very pleasant to chat to.

Noticed how the politicians still have nice haircuts (with one notable
exception).

Seems it's do as I say not as I do yet again....

On 02/05/2020 14:35, Stephen Cole wrote:
kat wrote:
On 01/05/2020 11:51, Stephen Cole wrote:
Fredxx wrote:
On 01/05/2020 09:32:02, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote:
Pamela wrote:
On 14:39 29 Apr 2020, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 13:32:58 on Wed,
29 Apr 2020, Pamela remarked:

Is there any information in the headers of a post to ULM to indicate which
moderator approved it?

I don't think so. Nor is there a public audit trail for which moderator
rejected a posting.

I bet that can lead to some inter-mod disagreement!

Why?

Ive run run a group for over 10 years which has several moderators. There
has never been a disagreement over another moderators decision. Not many
posts are rejected but if one is, then it is for a valid reason. The same
goes for two other groups I moderate.

Not everyone behaves like you Pamela, not everyone behaves like women in
working in a hairdressers.

Why the misogynistic attack on female salon workers, Brian?

How many hairdressers do you know?

Off the top of my head, three or four.

HTH.


I know quite a few, and it has to be said, it is true, not everyone behaves like
women working in hairdressers. Some people seem incapable of being that
pleasant and polite. Some even seem to make up really weird insults.


I have my hair and beard cut at a Turkish barbershop and the guys in there
have always been very pleasant to chat to.

love ARKO .....

On 02/05/2020 15:23, Rambo wrote:

o.

Noticed how the politicians still have nice haircuts (with one notable
exception).

Seems it's do as I say not as I do yet again....


Fret not Rambo, my son, and my son in law, and assorted male grandchildren ( one
of whom shares your nickname), all do too, using electric clippers, at home.

--
kat
^..^