Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce
All of the component companies have always done nonsense like that, but I
think that is more down to the morons employed in dispatch, rather than company policy. RS, and Farnell for that matter, used to send out small items by Royal Mail, in a Jiffy bag, by default, and for the most part, the bits arrived in the post, at a predictable time, the next morning when you needed them, and undamaged. Couldn't agree more with you Arfa totally on the nail;!... The shipping policies that both of these companies have now, for the most part preclude this ever happening any more, and it is unhelpful to all concerned, including them, because if I can find an alternative supplier for my orders each time, who will ship them Royal Mail, then they will get the order, irrespective of whether they are a few pennies dearer, or charge for shipping. Yes you can tell them that, but the reply usually is Oh' dear!, your the only one who's had that problem/complained;(... -- Tony Sayer |
#82
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce, getting seriously OT
There's a lot of rubbish talked about salt. And food in general. Balance is all. If your body is short of something, you get hunger and cravings: Plus we all have different metabolisms, but that doesn't suit the nanny state. I happen to have good cholesterol despite having an aversion to anything green, so the BBC can shove five a day (or more) up their arses. |
#83
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce
tony sayer wrote:
All of the component companies have always done nonsense like that, but I think that is more down to the morons employed in dispatch, rather than company policy. RS, and Farnell for that matter, used to send out small items by Royal Mail, in a Jiffy bag, by default, and for the most part, the bits arrived in the post, at a predictable time, the next morning when you needed them, and undamaged. Couldn't agree more with you Arfa totally on the nail;!... The shipping policies that both of these companies have now, for the most part preclude this ever happening any more, and it is unhelpful to all concerned, including them, because if I can find an alternative supplier for my orders each time, who will ship them Royal Mail, then they will get the order, irrespective of whether they are a few pennies dearer, or charge for shipping. Yes you can tell them that, but the reply usually is Oh' dear!, your the only one who's had that problem/complained;(... If a company, large or small, can't muster the resources to send something out by first class post, they're probably not very resourceful in other areas of their business either. |
#84
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce, getting seriously OT
Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:03:01 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: I think the worse danger is that you then lose chloride ions too fast. Thought it was the sodium. Get low on sodium (or potassium) and the nervous sytem starts to misbehave. But you need chlrodes as well... You are right. Its potassium I should have said, not the chloride bit. Must be getting old. |
#85
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce, getting seriously OT
much snipped Like the renowned monosod. glucamate(SP?) flavor enhacer. Just makes you want to consume more, water in the case of salt. I'm not a great eater of such things, but I find now that prepared soups say are often very salty - almost to the point of being uneatable for me - esp tinned ones, but also sometimes the chilled ones. I've found /some/ of the Aldi ones ok. -- B Thumbs Change lycos to yahoo to reply Some people just lack the capacity to understand, I fear ... :-\ Arfa |
#86
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
New & Improved {Was: RS & Parcelforce}
Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 16:04:09 +0100, Phil L wrote: It's like the dreaded words 'new and improved recipie' on one of your regular groceries, Agreed, lates one Cauldron Foods Lincolnshire or Cumberland sausages. Now rubbery and rather too herby in flavour. The packaging states: "We'd love to know what you think... addressphone no. or visit our website www.cauldronfoods.co.uk. I can't find anywhere on the saite that allows you to let them "know what you think". "Talk to Us". http://cauldronfoods.co.uk/talk-to-us/ |
#87
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
New & Improved {Was: RS & Parcelforce}
"Dave Liquorice" wrote in message ll.co.uk... On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 16:04:09 +0100, Phil L wrote: It's like the dreaded words 'new and improved recipie' on one of your regular groceries, Agreed, lates one Cauldron Foods Lincolnshire or Cumberland sausages. Now rubbery and rather too herby in flavour. The packaging states: "We'd love to know what you think... addressphone no. or visit our website www.cauldronfoods.co.uk. I can't find anywhere on the saite that allows you to let them "know what you think". -- Cheers Dave. I recently bought some faggots from an Irish 'family food' company, that were on promotion as being new to the market, in my local Co-op store. I've always loved Brain's frozen faggots as being true to the West Country recipe, so I thought that I would give these a try. They were the foulest tasting thing I have ever encountered. There was an email address on the packaging, inviting customer comments on this new dish that they had brought to the market. So bad was the product, and since they were asking, I took the trouble to tell them - not unkindly, I might add - just what was wrong with the product, and some helpful suggestions about how they could improve it, if they were ever to seriously challenge a brand leader such as Brain's. So interested were they in this feedback, they didn't even bother to acknowledge my email, let alone reply to it ... Like with RS and Farnell, whilst they might pretend to be interested in what customers think, it's actually only a PR 'front', and things will always go on just as they were, until some expensive bought-in consultant, deems that they are getting it wrong. Arfa |
#88
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce
In message kOj_n.156784$tH4.149064@hurricane, stuart noble
writes tony sayer wrote: All of the component companies have always done nonsense like that, but I think that is more down to the morons employed in dispatch, rather than company policy. RS, and Farnell for that matter, used to send out small items by Royal Mail, in a Jiffy bag, by default, and for the most part, the bits arrived in the post, at a predictable time, the next morning when you needed them, and undamaged. Couldn't agree more with you Arfa totally on the nail;!... The shipping policies that both of these companies have now, for the most part preclude this ever happening any more, and it is unhelpful to all concerned, including them, because if I can find an alternative supplier for my orders each time, who will ship them Royal Mail, then they will get the order, irrespective of whether they are a few pennies dearer, or charge for shipping. Yes you can tell them that, but the reply usually is Oh' dear!, your the only one who's had that problem/complained;(... If a company, large or small, can't muster the resources to send something out by first class post, they're probably not very resourceful in other areas of their business either. Simply not true I don't use the postal service because there is no "buck stops here" person I can get straight through to and deal with If I send out to a customer with royal mail and it disappears, they don't want to freeze to death for 30 days while waiting to see if itr has turned up. I need to be dealing with companies who can deal with problems quickly and efficiently In the winter, we are flat out working, there is no mileage to be gained in saving a customer maybe a couple of quid at a cost to us of probably £50 or more I think you need to reassess your idea of how companies function -- geoff |
#89
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce, getting seriously OT
In message , The Natural Philosopher
writes Dave Liquorice wrote: On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:03:01 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: I think the worse danger is that you then lose chloride ions too fast. Thought it was the sodium. Get low on sodium (or potassium) and the nervous sytem starts to misbehave. But you need chlrodes as well... You are right. Its potassium I should have said, not the chloride bit. Must be getting old. Good job you don't have a swimming pool, eh ? -- geoff |
#90
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
New & Improved {Was: RS & Parcelforce}
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:39:53 +0100, Rob wrote:
My word. That's one of the worst sites I've seen in a long time. There seems to be some form of flash detection going on I don't have flash and it defaults to a very basic text only version, except that doesn't work at all. Loads of links but all they do is alter the colour of the links you click to "visited"... it doesn't show you the content that one might expect from the link you click. I guess the site is just living up to it's name "Softwa Kryptronic Hybrid X Core (KHXC) Copyright: 1999-2010 Kryptronic, Inc." -- Cheers Dave. |
#91
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
New & Improved {Was: RS & Parcelforce}
Dave Liquorice
wibbled on Sunday 11 July 2010 15:42 On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:39:53 +0100, Rob wrote: My word. That's one of the worst sites I've seen in a long time. There seems to be some form of flash detection going on I don't have flash and it defaults to a very basic text only version, except that doesn't work at all. Loads of links but all they do is alter the colour of the links you click to "visited"... it doesn't show you the content that one might expect from the link you click. Wonder if you found the "online shop" because that looks as you describe. I guess the site is just living up to it's name "Softwa Kryptronic Hybrid X Core (KHXC) Copyright: 1999-2010 Kryptronic, Inc." Kretinonic Hybrid more like. I think I will ring them when I get bored enough. I emailed the web developer and he said, and I quote: "Thanks for your comments and observations. The entire Lilley site is currently under a full redesign and will be up and running within 3 to 4 weeks. It will be cms based and without flash which I'm sure you'll appreciate :-) . There will also eventually be an iphone version which will follow in the coming months. I still believe that flash has it's place on the web but not in this instance. It was purely intended as an introduction to the site but has now outgrown it's usefulness. The ssl cert should still be valid though and i will check this. Thanks for pointing it out. I hope that the changes enhance your online experience and look forward to dealing with you in future. " Sigh... What is so stupid is they could have left the original in place which worked well enough (well enough for me to discover them via Google and well enough to actually buy stuff)... It's a recession - you'd think they'd try a bit harder. -- Tim Watts Managers, politicians and environmentalists: Nature's carbon buffer. |
#92
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
New & Improved {Was: RS & Parcelforce}
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:18:30 +0100, Clot wrote:
The packaging states: "We'd love to know what you think... addressphone no. or visit our website www.cauldronfoods.co.uk. I can't find anywhere on the saite that allows you to let them "know what you think". "Talk to Us". http://cauldronfoods.co.uk/talk-to-us/ No link to that from the homepage that I can see and a search for "contact" returns no results. The designer seems to think that avoiding the use of the word "contact" clever, it's not it just makes using the sight hard. The homepage doesn't render at all well and comes from a brain dead web designer who thinks that content text will always be the size they set. Font size is under control of the user... so the alignment of text to the lines on the background drifts and the containers are not the correct size for the text. There is no suitable option in the compulsory Subject drop down list for "Product Feedback", I guess it sort of fits under "Suggestions/Ideas" in that I suggest they drop the "new, improved" recipe and go back to the old one. -- Cheers Dave. |
#93
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce
geoff wrote:
In message kOj_n.156784$tH4.149064@hurricane, stuart noble writes tony sayer wrote: All of the component companies have always done nonsense like that, but I think that is more down to the morons employed in dispatch, rather than company policy. RS, and Farnell for that matter, used to send out small items by Royal Mail, in a Jiffy bag, by default, and for the most part, the bits arrived in the post, at a predictable time, the next morning when you needed them, and undamaged. Couldn't agree more with you Arfa totally on the nail;!... The shipping policies that both of these companies have now, for the most part preclude this ever happening any more, and it is unhelpful to all concerned, including them, because if I can find an alternative supplier for my orders each time, who will ship them Royal Mail, then they will get the order, irrespective of whether they are a few pennies dearer, or charge for shipping. Yes you can tell them that, but the reply usually is Oh' dear!, your the only one who's had that problem/complained;(... If a company, large or small, can't muster the resources to send something out by first class post, they're probably not very resourceful in other areas of their business either. Simply not true I don't use the postal service because there is no "buck stops here" person I can get straight through to and deal with If I send out to a customer with royal mail and it disappears, they don't want to freeze to death for 30 days while waiting to see if itr has turned up. I need to be dealing with companies who can deal with problems quickly and efficiently In the winter, we are flat out working, there is no mileage to be gained in saving a customer maybe a couple of quid at a cost to us of probably £50 or more I think you need to reassess your idea of how companies function But we're talking here about offering customers the option of sending small, probably low cost, components out by post. If somebody's boiler pcb gets lost, that's another matter and, as you say, it isn't worth trying to save a couple of quid. |
#94
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce, getting seriously OT
In message Vai_n.123555$m87.99830@hurricane, Arfa Daily
wrote Are you seriously suggesting that every world class and renowned Michelin starred chef is wrong ? You cannot become part of the over-salty food club without being judged by someone who expects food to be "seasoned" with a ton of salt. -- Alan news2009 {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
#95
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
New & Improved {Was: RS & Parcelforce}
In message o.uk, Dave
Liquorice writes On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:18:30 +0100, Clot wrote: The packaging states: "We'd love to know what you think... addressphone no. or visit our website www.cauldronfoods.co.uk. I can't find anywhere on the saite that allows you to let them "know what you think". "Talk to Us". http://cauldronfoods.co.uk/talk-to-us/ No link to that from the homepage that I can see and a search for "contact" returns no results. middle row at the top of the page, right hand side, above the search box on the page I can see. -- Chris French |
#96
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
New & Improved {Was: RS & Parcelforce}
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:45:07 +0100, chris French wrote:
http://cauldronfoods.co.uk/talk-to-us/ No link to that from the homepage that I can see and a search for "contact" returns no results. middle row at the top of the page, right hand side, above the search box on the page I can see. Not here. http://i26.tinypic.com/21mi1pg.jpg I have a minimum font size set, web "designer" appears to be unaware that the size of text displayed by a browser is not under their control but that of the user. -- Cheers Dave. |
#97
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
New & Improved {Was: RS & Parcelforce}
"Dave Liquorice" wrote in message ll.co.uk... On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 16:04:09 +0100, Phil L wrote: It's like the dreaded words 'new and improved recipie' on one of your regular groceries, Agreed, lates one Cauldron Foods Lincolnshire or Cumberland sausages. Now rubbery and rather too herby in flavour. The packaging states: "We'd love to know what you think... addressphone no. or visit our website www.cauldronfoods.co.uk. I can't find anywhere on the saite that allows you to let them "know what you think". "talk to us" |
#98
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
New & Improved {Was: RS & Parcelforce}
"Dave Liquorice" wrote in message ll.co.uk... On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:45:07 +0100, chris French wrote: http://cauldronfoods.co.uk/talk-to-us/ No link to that from the homepage that I can see and a search for "contact" returns no results. middle row at the top of the page, right hand side, above the search box on the page I can see. Not here. http://i26.tinypic.com/21mi1pg.jpg I have a minimum font size set, web "designer" appears to be unaware that the size of text displayed by a browser is not under their control but that of the user. Sounds like you need a new browser. |
#99
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
New & Improved {Was: RS & Parcelforce}
In message o.uk, Dave
Liquorice writes On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:45:07 +0100, chris French wrote: http://cauldronfoods.co.uk/talk-to-us/ No link to that from the homepage that I can see and a search for "contact" returns no results. middle row at the top of the page, right hand side, above the search box on the page I can see. Not here. http://i26.tinypic.com/21mi1pg.jpg I have a minimum font size set, web "designer" appears to be unaware that the size of text displayed by a browser is not under their control but that of the user. This is what I see (In current version of IE, Opera and Firefox on Win XP): tp://i26.tinypic.com/n2jz1z.jpg You appear to be missing the a whole line of links . Not sure that text size has anything to do with this. The links are there when the page is displayed without their stylesheet, so I'm guessing it's maybe related to the way your browser is interpreting the CSS maybe? -- Chris French |
#100
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce, getting seriously OT
On 11 Jul,
"Arfa Daily" wrote: Some people just lack the capacity to understand, I fear ... :-\ Talking about yourself, dear. -- B Thumbs Change lycos to yahoo to reply |
#101
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember Bob Eager saying something like: Best one was the 5ft fluorescent tubes. Wrapped in extensive bubble wrap with a label stuck on. No box. I think they were folded to get them in the van. They were certainly folded when they arrived. And saved you all the trouble of waiting for them to burn out and then recycling them. |
#102
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
New & Improved {Was: RS & Parcelforce}
On 11/07/2010 15:56, Tim Watts wrote:
Dave wibbled on Sunday 11 July 2010 15:42 On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 13:39:53 +0100, Rob wrote: My word. That's one of the worst sites I've seen in a long time. There seems to be some form of flash detection going on I don't have flash and it defaults to a very basic text only version, except that doesn't work at all. Loads of links but all they do is alter the colour of the links you click to "visited"... it doesn't show you the content that one might expect from the link you click. Wonder if you found the "online shop" because that looks as you describe. I guess the site is just living up to it's name "Softwa Kryptronic Hybrid X Core (KHXC) Copyright: 1999-2010 Kryptronic, Inc." Kretinonic Hybrid more like. I think I will ring them when I get bored enough. I emailed the web developer and he said, and I quote: "Thanks for your comments and observations. The entire Lilley site is currently under a full redesign and will be up and running within 3 to 4 weeks. It will be cms based and without flash which I'm sure you'll appreciate :-) . There will also eventually be an iphone version which will follow in the coming months. I still believe that flash has it's place on the web but not in this instance. It was purely intended as an introduction to the site but has now outgrown it's usefulness. The ssl cert should still be valid though and i will check this. Thanks for pointing it out. I hope that the changes enhance your online experience and look forward to dealing with you in future. " Sigh... What is so stupid is they could have left the original in place which worked well enough (well enough for me to discover them via Google and well enough to actually buy stuff)... It's a recession - you'd think they'd try a bit harder. I particularly liked the tag at the bottom of the page - where it said Copyright (c)2007 Your Company Sigh! Adrian |
#103
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce, getting seriously OT
"Alan" wrote in message ... In message Vai_n.123555$m87.99830@hurricane, Arfa Daily wrote Are you seriously suggesting that every world class and renowned Michelin starred chef is wrong ? You cannot become part of the over-salty food club without being judged by someone who expects food to be "seasoned" with a ton of salt. -- Alan And another who lacks the capacity ... "with a ton of salt" Have you listened to, or understood nothing ? From that stupid comment, I guess not ... Arfa |
#104
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce, getting seriously OT
In message Vai_n.123555$m87.99830@hurricane, Arfa Daily
writes "chris French" wrote in message k... In message , Arfa Daily writes "Alan" wrote in message ... In message , Arfa Daily wrote We actually own a family food business, That's the problem with too much salt in food. People in the business are addicted to salt and tasting it all day doesn't give them salty "hit" so they always add a bit more. All of which actually shows that you know absolutely nothing about the production of food, and seasoning it properly ... The salt cannot be added afterward, because then, what you taste is salt. Seasoning, as I said, is not about tasting salt in the food. It is absolute nonsense to suggest that professional and trained cooks are addicted to salt. It's just that they have a trained palate, Or maybe they have trained their palates to expect food to taste as it does when seasoned? They are used to it and therefor it tastes wrong without it? I'm not saying they are addicted to it, just used to a certain way of food tasting. Are you seriously suggesting that every world class and renowned Michelin starred chef is wrong ? Wrong? Dunno, I'm just questioning the orthodoxy that adding salt to food (call it seasoning if you like) 'brings out the flavour'. Certainly ISTM that limiting the salt you add to your food, seems to change how much you taste the salt added to food. Your concept is utterly wrong. You do not taste the salt added to food during its preparation - unless its use has been heavy handed. The salt is put in, in *small* and correct quantities to 'bring out' the flavours of other ingredients, as they combine in the cooking process, to produce new flavours. It acts as a sort of flavour catalyst, if you like. No, I understand exactly what you mean. I didn't say that it mean that you could consciously taste the salt, just that is the food is always seasoned with salt that maybe someone gets used to food tasting that way. Maybe I'm wrong, it'd be interesting to see evidence on this, but it doesn't really bother me. I'm happy cooking they way I do, which is the important thing as far as I'm converned. -- Chris French |
#105
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 10:16:04 +0100, Alan
wrote: Many companies use RS etc. because they can trace the source of the components About 20- 30 years that wasn't the case. We had to use Farnell or other accredited suppliers because RS insisted on remarking all their semiconductors. When a design specifically needed a Nat Semi 74xx it was no good fitting an 'RS 74xx' often with no date code. The propagation timing on some circuit designs was often a bit too critical, the setting of timing components varied between Nat Semi and TI so often an identical replacement was justified. Now and again the requirements even dictated a specific date code or a range of date codes, others might work but not repeatedly, the spreads on timing tolerances were such that even with parts from so called good date codes wouldn't always work in situ. Sometimes, when the **** hit the fan we'd temporarily have to resort to the untraceable crap from RS in non critical areas. Now and again we'd apply toluene to the package and remove the markings to see what was underneath, often it was nothing, but occasionally it was the full traceable markings from a major manufacturer. RS went out of the way to reduce visibility of the source of their components, maybe it was a marketing thing but it took them decades before they came into line with everyone else in the industry. -- |
#106
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 00:49:04 +0100, "Arfa Daily"
wrote: At least if the Post Office can't deliver personally, it's back with them just down the road, by lunchtime. Maybe that applies for some Post Office customers, for others like me if its undelivered it's in the system for 48 hours until a personal collection is possible from the local sorting office. If the missed delivery is on a Friday then it's going to be Monday before it can be collected, and not until after 7am where, unless you arrive well ahead of time, you join a huge queue. A requested redelivery back to the original address wouldn't arrive until Tuesday. But most of the time the usual postie signs for it himself, leaves it hidden somewhere and pops a note through the door. The local couriers used to be fantastic, DHL was 8:30 am delivery on the dot by a woman you'd expect to see on the cover of a fashion magazine, UPS 10:30am , Parcelforce noon to 1pm, Royal Mail postie regular as clockwork at 2pm except when he's on holiday where everything goes tits up (see above) DHL have gone down the ****ter, some of it is a local thing since the driver changed, the new one is a grumpy bald headed ******* but what really gets me is when DHL use their 'at home' or whatever they call delivery to 'non business' addresses. Deliveries by the DHL van now arrive mid morning, DHL 'at home' from the same bloody supplier on a split shipment can come at 6pm. Sods law is that the bits in the later delivery are what you desperately need first. Arseholes. -- |
#107
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce
Andrew Gabriel wrote:
However, companies seem to like to have accounts with them for buying one-offs, modelshop/prototype manufacture, etc. and I've worked for companies who insist we ordered from RS. I don't imagine many companies would be using them as a supplier for a production line though. Certainly, when I worked for a computer manufacturer some 15 years ago, development staff ordered their bits from RS, but when products were handed over to the production line, the production line buyer would source direct from the manufacturers or distributors. My experience in those days was much the same. OK for one-offs, but specifically banned for production. IIRC, the main problem was that they had no process for back ordering. If it was in stock, they shipped it. If it was not in stock they told you. End of. Chris -- Chris J Dixon Nottingham UK Have dancing shoes, will ceilidh. |
#108
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce
On Jul 10, 9:17*pm, geoff wrote:
In message lEPZn.173226$NW.8404@hurricane, Arfa Daily writes Today, I ordered five 8 pin chips from RS. And how are they coming ? By DHL for christ's sake. Why ? It's coming 10 miles down the road from Corby. Use the Bloody Post office and a Jiffy bag ! It's gotta be cheaper than using a courier for small packages, hasn't it ? I get this all the time "can't you just post it?" No I f'king can't Who do you think is going to leave work, go 15 minutes down the road, stand in a queue behind half a dozen people for another 15 minutes and then come back having lost all in all about an hour of productive work Royal Mail colect from regular customers. MBQ |
#109
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce
In message , The Other Mike
wrote The local couriers used to be fantastic, DHL was 8:30 am delivery on the dot by a woman you'd expect to see on the cover of a fashion magazine, UPS 10:30am , Parcelforce noon to 1pm, Royal Mail postie regular as clockwork at 2pm except when he's on holiday where everything goes tits up (see above) The problem with the majority of couriers around my way is the distance to the local depot. Although I live in a village of approximately 200,000 people the nearest "local courier depot is a round trip of 30miles. With Parcelfarce it's more like 60 miles. -- Alan news2009 {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
#110
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
New & Improved {Was: RS & Parcelforce}
On 11/07/2010 13:30 Tim Watts wrote:
What possesses people to take down a website in order to develop a new one in place? Where do they get their cretinous web developers who can't develop offline and then to top it off, can't finish the job? A bank? Like Egg? They 'improved' their website over four months ago when they broke the ability to pay money in using a debit card that wasn't part of the 'Verified by Visa' system. It worked fine before, it doesn't work now. It works on other sites. They 'think' they might have a fix sometime in August (2010 I assume). -- F |
#111
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce, getting seriously OT
In message UIs_n.120782$wi5.11389@hurricane, Arfa Daily
wrote "Alan" wrote in message ... In message Vai_n.123555$m87.99830@hurricane, Arfa Daily wrote Are you seriously suggesting that every world class and renowned Michelin starred chef is wrong ? You cannot become part of the over-salty food club without being judged by someone who expects food to be "seasoned" with a ton of salt. -- Alan And another who lacks the capacity ... "with a ton of salt" Have you listened to, or understood nothing ? From that stupid comment, I guess not ... Nothing stupid about the comment. Watch any the Michelin starred chefs at work on TV and you will see how extra salt they add to everything. Look on the side of a supermarket meal where these same celebrities have lent their name to the brand. See how much salt they contain. -- Alan news2009 {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
#112
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce, getting seriously OT
On 12/07/2010 09:34, chris French wrote:
Certainly ISTM that limiting the salt you add to your food, seems to change how much you taste the salt added to food. Your concept is utterly wrong. You do not taste the salt added to food during its preparation - unless its use has been heavy handed. The salt is put in, in *small* and correct quantities to 'bring out' the flavours of other ingredients, as they combine in the cooking process, to produce new flavours. It acts as a sort of flavour catalyst, if you like. I used to think that, until I noticed how much extra salt and pepper my wife added to the food I cooked. Since then, I have left her to season food at the table and there has been no rise in the amount of salt she uses. There is a very good argument about seasoning while cooking though, but I don't use it. No, I understand exactly what you mean. I didn't say that it mean that you could consciously taste the salt, just that is the food is always seasoned with salt that maybe someone gets used to food tasting that way. Yes, it is very easy to get lulled into that idea. The older we get, the more careful I am about limiting the salt in our diet. Maybe I'm wrong, it'd be interesting to see evidence on this, but it doesn't really bother me. I'm happy cooking they way I do, which is the important thing as far as I'm concerned. Me too. The only naughties I do is to add salt and white pepper to mash potatoes along with some butter and a drop of full fat milk. Dave |
#113
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce
In article ,
geoff writes: I've had what I presume were intact lightbulbs when they were dispatched from CPC in orders even the replacements needed replacing This has become a running joke at work. Our orders contain lots of things for different people. First time was many years ago. An order which contained both light bulbs, and a bulk box of D-cells. The box arrived with the D-cells obviously all loose, and powdered glass coming out of the box corners. Many similar incodents since. I've also had the same fluorescent tube packer. These were quite short T4 tubes, all wrapped in bubble wrap, and then bound with sellotape so tightly round the middle that all the tubes were snapped in half. Also had a delivery including 5 litres windscreen wash concentrate. Was following it on the UPS tracking, when it suddenly changed state to "package burst/spilled, returning to sender". I'll bet that was fun in the back of the UPS van, with all those Amazon orders... -- Andrew Gabriel [email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup] |
#114
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce, getting seriously OT
The only naughties I do is to add salt and white pepper to mash
potatoes along with some butter and a drop of full fat milk. Dave Decadence |
#115
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce
Alan wrote:
The problem with the majority of couriers around my way is the distance to the local depot. Although I live in a village of approximately 200,000 people the nearest "local courier depot is a round trip of 30miles. With Parcelfarce it's more like 60 miles. My son once had a 25 mile drive to get a parcel, then 25 back. Only when he was checking the packing list did he realise the box was marked "1 of 2"... Andy |
#116
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce
In message
, Man at B&Q writes On Jul 10, 9:17*pm, geoff wrote: In message lEPZn.173226$NW.8404@hurricane, Arfa Daily writes Today, I ordered five 8 pin chips from RS. And how are they coming ? By DHL for christ's sake. Why ? It's coming 10 miles down the road from Corby. Use the Bloody Post office and a Jiffy bag ! It's gotta be cheaper than using a courier for small packages, hasn't it ? I get this all the time "can't you just post it?" No I f'king can't Who do you think is going to leave work, go 15 minutes down the road, stand in a queue behind half a dozen people for another 15 minutes and then come back having lost all in all about an hour of productive work Royal Mail colect from regular customers. And do you have a telephone number where I can get straight through to someone who will sort out a non delivery within 10 minutes? -- geoff |
#117
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce
In message , The Other Mike
writes On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 10:16:04 +0100, Alan wrote: Many companies use RS etc. because they can trace the source of the components About 20- 30 years that wasn't the case. We had to use Farnell or other accredited suppliers because RS insisted on remarking all their semiconductors. When a design specifically needed a Nat Semi 74xx it was no good fitting an 'RS 74xx' often with no date code. The propagation timing on some circuit designs was often a bit too critical, the setting of timing components varied between Nat Semi and TI so often an identical replacement was justified. Now and again the requirements even dictated a specific date code or a range of date codes, others might work but not repeatedly, the spreads on timing tolerances were such that even with parts from so called good date codes wouldn't always work in situ. Sometimes, when the **** hit the fan we'd temporarily have to resort to the untraceable crap from RS in non critical areas. Now and again we'd apply toluene to the package and remove the markings to see what was underneath, often it was nothing, but occasionally it was the full traceable markings from a major manufacturer. RS went out of the way to reduce visibility of the source of their components, maybe it was a marketing thing but it took them decades before they came into line with everyone else in the industry. I probably still have ICs kicking around where the part number has been removed and the 6 digit (as was) RS code stamped on -- geoff |
#118
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
New & Improved {Was: RS & Parcelforce}
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:22:18 +0100, F wrote:
On 11/07/2010 13:30 Tim Watts wrote: What possesses people to take down a website in order to develop a new one in place? Where do they get their cretinous web developers who can't develop offline and then to top it off, can't finish the job? A bank? Like Egg? They 'improved' their website over four months ago when they broke the ability to pay money in using a debit card that wasn't part of the 'Verified by Visa' system. It worked fine before, it doesn't work now. It works on other sites. They 'think' they might have a fix sometime in August (2010 I assume). I closed my Egg accounts long ago, and I remember that it was because of the constantly broken nature of their website. -- Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org *lightning protection* - a w_tom conductor |
#119
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:07:53 +0100, Alan wrote:
In message , The Other Mike wrote The local couriers used to be fantastic, DHL was 8:30 am delivery on the dot by a woman you'd expect to see on the cover of a fashion magazine, UPS 10:30am , Parcelforce noon to 1pm, Royal Mail postie regular as clockwork at 2pm except when he's on holiday where everything goes tits up (see above) The problem with the majority of couriers around my way is the distance to the local depot. Although I live in a village of approximately 200,000 people the nearest "local courier depot is a round trip of 30miles. With Parcelfarce it's more like 60 miles. Parcelforce round here have recentaly started delivering to the local Post Office when there is no reply - seems like a sensible option (and no, they don't charge the fee that applies when you request this service) |
#120
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
RS & Parcelforce, getting seriously OT
On 12/07/2010 18:25, stuart noble wrote:
The only naughties I do is to add salt and white pepper to mash potatoes along with some butter and a drop of full fat milk. Dave Decadence Yes, but I once went blind in my left eye about 25 or more years ago. The doctors advised me to go on a low fat diet. I was on one at the time anyway. I did this ,until I missed the butter in my life. No problems since though. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Parcelforce and TLC | UK diy |