On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 12:27:33 PM UTC-5, ChairMan wrote:
Bob F wrote:
trader_4 wrote:
Yeah, figures you'd buy that Trump BS too. Let's look at
the
differences. Reagan was a Democrat back in the 30s, in
the days
of Roosevelt. By the 1950s he was touring the country,
giving
speeches at GE plants and those speeches were based on
conservative
philosophy and you wouldn't be able to distinguish them
from
his speeches in the 80s.

Yes - he was speaking against the proposed medicare
program, telling
us it would bring the disaster of total socialism to
America.
Clearly, civilization has since fallen due to the horrible
creation
of medicare.
If you agree with him, it's time to burn your medicare
card.

If medicare is such a success, why isn't there a doughnut
hole in the welfare program?

There is nothing wrong with a program to help the needy and those who can't help themselves. The problem is that government run assistance programs are rife with waste and fraud plus the programs are used to buy votes by Liberal politicians who are well aware of the waste and fraud. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Wasted Monster

Uncle Monster wrote:
On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 12:27:36 AM UTC-5, Bob F wrote:
T wrote:
On 09/25/2015 02:35 PM, Oren wrote:
If elected I will not run.

Huh. Are we starting to see a crack open up.

"If elected I will not run" means you won't run
from your duty if elected. Much better than it
your previous denials.

You know I am only joking. Maybe not completely.

Sarah P was elected, and then ran, never to finish her term.

Those of your ilk were so terrified of Sara Palin that paid
operatives were sent to Alaska to attack her anyway they could such
as bringing numerous frivolous ethics complaints against her in
order to disrupt her job as governor and to bring financial ruin to
her family. Governor Palin resigned because of the large amount of
state money and resources it took to beat the legal ethics complaints
in court. I was amazed at how scared the Left was of Sara Palin that
they thought it necessary to do whatever they could to harm her and
her family. Making fun of her special needs infant son was another
nasty tactic used by the Left in an attempt to hurt her. Bob, you and
your fellow Progressive Liberal Leftist Commiecrat Freaks show your
true colors whenever confronted with someone who can expose you for
what piles of excrement you really are. ^_^

When I heard McCain had selected Sarah, I celebrated.

Your words make it clear just what kind of excrement you are. You don't need any
help making that clear. What a moron!.

On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:22:41 -0700, "Bob F"
wrote:

Your words make it clear just what kind of excrement you are. You don't need any
help making that clear. What a moron!.


You sound just like Trump and Hillary. Attack the person and not give
facts. Moron!!

Don't you have some innocent babies to kill today. Rip them from the
womb before their day in court?

Uncle Monster wrote:
On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 12:27:33 PM UTC-5, ChairMan wrote:
Bob F wrote:
trader_4 wrote:
Yeah, figures you'd buy that Trump BS too. Let's look at
the
differences. Reagan was a Democrat back in the 30s, in
the days
of Roosevelt. By the 1950s he was touring the country,
giving
speeches at GE plants and those speeches were based on
conservative
philosophy and you wouldn't be able to distinguish them
from
his speeches in the 80s.

Yes - he was speaking against the proposed medicare
program, telling
us it would bring the disaster of total socialism to
America.
Clearly, civilization has since fallen due to the horrible
creation
of medicare.
If you agree with him, it's time to burn your medicare
card.

If medicare is such a success, why isn't there a doughnut
hole in the welfare program?

There is nothing wrong with a program to help the needy and those who
can't help themselves. The problem is that government run assistance
programs are rife with waste and fraud plus the programs are used to
buy votes by Liberal politicians who are well aware of the waste and
fraud. ^_^

And corporate run medical companies are rife with corruption. waste, and
insurance company death panels whose only reason for making decisions is to
enhance profits. Our system costs twice as much as the medical care of just
about any other wealthy nation per capita, and the results are far worse. Infant
mortality in the USA is higher than 27 other wealthy countries.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/w...embarrassment/

Uncle Monster wrote:
On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 9:54:59 AM UTC-5, Bob F wrote:
trader_4 wrote:
Yeah, figures you'd buy that Trump BS too. Let's look at the
differences. Reagan was a Democrat back in the 30s, in the days
of Roosevelt. By the 1950s he was touring the country, giving
speeches at GE plants and those speeches were based on conservative
philosophy and you wouldn't be able to distinguish them from
his speeches in the 80s.

Yes - he was speaking against the proposed medicare program, telling
us it would bring the disaster of total socialism to America.
Clearly, civilization has since fallen due to the horrible creation
of medicare.

If you agree with him, it's time to burn your medicare card.

Bobby, you and your people support Medicare and welfare fraud because
your elite rulers can buy votes with it. ^_^


I suppot medicare because it guarantees some level of medical care for EVERY
aging American. Nobody supports welfare fraud, despite your continuous
blatherings. I support medicare for all, so every American can get medical care
when they need it, and therefore avoid major medacal expenses that help make the
US system the most expensive in the world.

You write here like an illiterate fool. No wonder your Republican party is going
to pieces. With morons like you supporting the wacko tea party crowd and the
celebrity candidate, and everyone elses wacko extremeist proposals , it's no
wonder you are becoming more and more marginalized. The more America turns
against you, the wackier you sound. The wackier you sound, the more you are
rejected.

Republicans are rapidly convincing me that their motto really is "I've got
mine - Screw You". You make that clear with every word you write.

On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 5:22:46 PM UTC-5, Bob F wrote:
Uncle Monster wrote:
On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 12:27:36 AM UTC-5, Bob F wrote:
T wrote:
On 09/25/2015 02:35 PM, Oren wrote:
If elected I will not run.

Huh. Are we starting to see a crack open up.

"If elected I will not run" means you won't run
from your duty if elected. Much better than it
your previous denials.

You know I am only joking. Maybe not completely.

Sarah P was elected, and then ran, never to finish her term.

Those of your ilk were so terrified of Sara Palin that paid
operatives were sent to Alaska to attack her anyway they could such
as bringing numerous frivolous ethics complaints against her in
order to disrupt her job as governor and to bring financial ruin to
her family. Governor Palin resigned because of the large amount of
state money and resources it took to beat the legal ethics complaints
in court. I was amazed at how scared the Left was of Sara Palin that
they thought it necessary to do whatever they could to harm her and
her family. Making fun of her special needs infant son was another
nasty tactic used by the Left in an attempt to hurt her. Bob, you and
your fellow Progressive Liberal Leftist Commiecrat Freaks show your
true colors whenever confronted with someone who can expose you for
what piles of excrement you really are. ^_^

When I heard McCain had selected Sarah, I celebrated.

Your words make it clear just what kind of excrement you are. You don't need any
help making that clear. What a moron!.

Let me see, first those of your ilk attack those who oppose you as being stupid because you believe you're are the smartest people on Earth. Then you go on to calling everyone "racist" if they don't agree with you until finally resorting to calling your opponents "Nazi". If you're so smart, why is it you don't know that you're using the tactics of your progenitors, the Nazis. ^_^

Here's a little clue for you. I'm not a drooling Palin supporter, I just don't like the way you people treated her. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Attack Monster

On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:52:45 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 2:10:46 PM UTC-4, Ashton Crusher wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 13:04:26 -0700, T wrote:

On 09/25/2015 12:22 PM, Oren wrote:
I'd rather hear honesty. Elect me and I won't do **** for you!

How about, "Elect me. I have no back bone and believe only in
myself and will tell you whatever you want to hear. But do
not despair, I am for sale!"

There are two candidates who are not saying that. Trump and Bernie.
If you don't vote for one of those you are going to get another 8
years of Bushama.

Trumps doesn't believe only in himself and isn't telling people
what he thinks they want to hear? If that's not the case, then
explain for example his total 180 on immigration from what he
said 3 years ago and just 2 months ago.

I don't hear Trump saying "I have backbone" or that he "only believes
in himself". And he's certainly not into saying "whatever you want to
hear." Nor is he for sale, he's self funding. If you want more of the
same old crap go right ahead and vote for one of the other clown car
candidates who are fully bought and paid for.

On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 13:33:25 -0700 (PDT), Uncle Monster
wrote:

On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 12:27:36 AM UTC-5, Bob F wrote:
T wrote:
On 09/25/2015 02:35 PM, Oren wrote:
If elected I will not run.

Huh. Are we starting to see a crack open up.

"If elected I will not run" means you won't run
from your duty if elected. Much better than it
your previous denials.

You know I am only joking. Maybe not completely.

Sarah P was elected, and then ran, never to finish her term.

Those of your ilk were so terrified of Sara Palin that paid operatives were sent to Alaska to attack her anyway they could such as bringing numerous frivolous ethics complaints against her in order to disrupt her job as governor and to bring financial ruin to her family. Governor Palin resigned because of the large amount of state money and resources it took to beat the legal ethics complaints in court. I was amazed at how scared the Left was of Sara Palin that they thought it necessary to do whatever they could to harm her and her family. Making fun of her special needs infant son was another nasty tactic used by the Left in an attempt to hurt her. Bob, you and your fellow Progressive Liberal Leftist Commiecrat Freaks show your true colors whenever confronted with someone who can expose you for what piles of excrement you really are. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Discerning Monster


The left was not scared of Palin. She drips stupid.

On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:29:12 -0700, Oren wrote:

On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:22:41 -0700, "Bob F"
wrote:

Your words make it clear just what kind of excrement you are. You don't need any
help making that clear. What a moron!.


You sound just like Trump and Hillary. Attack the person and not give
facts. Moron!!

Don't you have some innocent babies to kill today. Rip them from the
womb before their day in court?

Can you tell us what books and Magazines you have been reading lately?
Or is that a "gotcha" question?

On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 13:07:29 -0700, T wrote:

On 09/25/2015 12:06 PM, Gordon Shumway wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 11:43:14 -0700, T wrote:

Boehner resigned! YIPPEE !!!!!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/...l?intcmp=hpbt1

That news is almost as good as the news will be of a federal grand
jury returning a federal indictment on Hillary.

One can only hope.


Never going to happen. Democrats are above the law in this country.

By all rights half of the departments heads should be in jail, starting
with Learner.

I do believe the term is "Elite Privilege"

The "rule of law" needs to be re-established. I won't hold my
breath.

Which two candidates are the most likely to re-establish a rule of law
and get rid of the elites....


Trump or Bernie. None of the others will. The others will just
settle in to business as usual.

On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 5:59:29 PM UTC-5, Bob F wrote:
Uncle Monster wrote:
On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 9:54:59 AM UTC-5, Bob F wrote:
trader_4 wrote:
Yeah, figures you'd buy that Trump BS too. Let's look at the
differences. Reagan was a Democrat back in the 30s, in the days
of Roosevelt. By the 1950s he was touring the country, giving
speeches at GE plants and those speeches were based on conservative
philosophy and you wouldn't be able to distinguish them from
his speeches in the 80s.

Yes - he was speaking against the proposed medicare program, telling
us it would bring the disaster of total socialism to America.
Clearly, civilization has since fallen due to the horrible creation
of medicare.

If you agree with him, it's time to burn your medicare card.

Bobby, you and your people support Medicare and welfare fraud because
your elite rulers can buy votes with it. ^_^


I suppot medicare because it guarantees some level of medical care for EVERY
aging American. Nobody supports welfare fraud, despite your continuous
blatherings. I support medicare for all, so every American can get medical care
when they need it, and therefore avoid major medacal expenses that help make the
US system the most expensive in the world.

You write here like an illiterate fool. No wonder your Republican party is going
to pieces. With morons like you supporting the wacko tea party crowd and the
celebrity candidate, and everyone elses wacko extremeist proposals , it's no
wonder you are becoming more and more marginalized. The more America turns
against you, the wackier you sound. The wackier you sound, the more you are
rejected.

Republicans are rapidly convincing me that their motto really is "I've got
mine - Screw You". You make that clear with every word you write.

I'm disappointed that you haven't called me "Nazi" yet. A little cloo for yoo. I'm not a Republican, Republicans disgust me but Democrats are special, they horrify me. I don't even know anyone who's a member of The Tea Party. What I actually like about Donald Trump is the fact that he's scaring the hell out of establishment RINO's and CINO's plus he's immune to attacks by a Liberal media. The greatest thing I like about Trump is the glaring fact that he's NOT POLITICALLY CORRECT. It's so much fun to watch him rattle the cages of you Progressive Liberal Leftist Commiecrat Freak monkeys. I'd have to vote for whomever receives the Republican nomination even Trump. Anyone other than Bernie Sanders, Hitlery Clinton, Joe Biden or whatever else the Democrats can regurgitate. We don't need another extension of the present incompetent Affirmative Action Executive Branch. I do know one thing about a Trump Presidency, it will be a lot of fun to watch how the rest of the world reacts to a fearless anti Politically Correct President. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Confident Monster

On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 1:09:39 PM UTC-5, Ashton Crusher wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 12:22:08 -0700, Oren wrote:

On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 12:02:49 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Friday, September 25, 2015 at 2:54:31 PM UTC-4, Oren wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 11:43:14 -0700, T wrote:

Boehner resigned! YIPPEE !!!!!!!


Where is the bad?! We don't need RINO's.

Probably should wait to find out who's going to replace him
before T starts celebrating. Whoever it is, I hope it's someone
who will keep the few extremists under control who want to shut
down the govt again, over Planned Parenthood this time.

Congress, by the Constitution in meant to be in grid-lock. It was
designed that way. Checks and balances. America is better off. I'm
tired of a politician saying what they "will do", gets elected and not
fill the promises made. Take Trump for example -- promises, promises
-- no substance in his rhetoric.

I'd rather hear honesty. Elect me and I won't do **** for you!

What you want to hear and what the vast majority of the other voters
want to hear are two different things. No one will ever be elected on
the platform of "I'll do nothing".

Ben Carson took an oath to do no harm. He'd make a good President. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Oath Monster

On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 7:40:04 PM UTC-5, Ashton Crusher wrote:
On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 13:33:25 -0700 (PDT), Uncle Monster
wrote:

On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 12:27:36 AM UTC-5, Bob F wrote:
T wrote:
On 09/25/2015 02:35 PM, Oren wrote:
If elected I will not run.

Huh. Are we starting to see a crack open up.

"If elected I will not run" means you won't run
from your duty if elected. Much better than it
your previous denials.

You know I am only joking. Maybe not completely.

Sarah P was elected, and then ran, never to finish her term.

Those of your ilk were so terrified of Sara Palin that paid operatives were sent to Alaska to attack her anyway they could such as bringing numerous frivolous ethics complaints against her in order to disrupt her job as governor and to bring financial ruin to her family. Governor Palin resigned because of the large amount of state money and resources it took to beat the legal ethics complaints in court. I was amazed at how scared the Left was of Sara Palin that they thought it necessary to do whatever they could to harm her and her family. Making fun of her special needs infant son was another nasty tactic used by the Left in an attempt to hurt her. Bob, you and your fellow Progressive Liberal Leftist Commiecrat Freaks show your true colors whenever confronted with someone who can expose you for what piles of excrement you really are. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Discerning Monster


The left was not scared of Palin. She drips stupid.

When was the last time you were elected governor of a state. I suppose you believe all Alaskans are stupid for voting for her? I'd like to know how YOU judge her to be stupid? Perhaps it's because of your great accomplishments? So exactly what did she do as governor of the state of Alaska that you judge to be stupid. Be sure to include "impartial" reliable links. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Impartial Monster

On 09/26/2015 06:00 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 5:59:29 PM UTC-5, Bob F wrote:
Uncle Monster wrote:
On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 9:54:59 AM UTC-5, Bob F wrote:
trader_4 wrote:
Yeah, figures you'd buy that Trump BS too. Let's look at the
differences. Reagan was a Democrat back in the 30s, in the days
of Roosevelt. By the 1950s he was touring the country, giving
speeches at GE plants and those speeches were based on conservative
philosophy and you wouldn't be able to distinguish them from
his speeches in the 80s.

Yes - he was speaking against the proposed medicare program, telling
us it would bring the disaster of total socialism to America.
Clearly, civilization has since fallen due to the horrible creation
of medicare.

If you agree with him, it's time to burn your medicare card.

Bobby, you and your people support Medicare and welfare fraud because
your elite rulers can buy votes with it. ^_^


I suppot medicare because it guarantees some level of medical care for EVERY
aging American. Nobody supports welfare fraud, despite your continuous
blatherings. I support medicare for all, so every American can get medical care
when they need it, and therefore avoid major medacal expenses that help make the
US system the most expensive in the world.

You write here like an illiterate fool. No wonder your Republican party is going
to pieces. With morons like you supporting the wacko tea party crowd and the
celebrity candidate, and everyone elses wacko extremeist proposals , it's no
wonder you are becoming more and more marginalized. The more America turns
against you, the wackier you sound. The wackier you sound, the more you are
rejected.

Republicans are rapidly convincing me that their motto really is "I've got
mine - Screw You". You make that clear with every word you write.

I'm disappointed that you haven't called me "Nazi" yet. A little cloo for yoo. I'm not a Republican, Republicans disgust me but Democrats are special, they horrify me. I don't even know anyone who's a member of The Tea Party. What I actually like about Donald Trump is the fact that he's scaring the hell out of establishment RINO's and CINO's plus he's immune to attacks by a Liberal media. The greatest thing I like about Trump is the glaring fact that he's NOT POLITICALLY CORRECT. It's so much fun to watch him rattle the cages of you Progressive Liberal Leftist Commiecrat Freak monkeys. I'd have to vote for whomever receives the Republican nomination even Trump. Anyone other than Bernie Sanders, Hitlery Clinton, Joe Biden or whatever else the Democrats can regurgitate. We don't need another extension of the present incompetent Affirmative Action Executive Branch. I do know one thing about a Trump Presidency, it will be a lot of fun to watch how the rest of the world reacts to a fearl
ess anti Politically Correct President. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Confident Monster


1+

On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 6:29:24 PM UTC-4, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:22:41 -0700, "Bob F"
wrote:

Your words make it clear just what kind of excrement you are. You don't need any
help making that clear. What a moron!.


You sound just like Trump and Hillary. Attack the person and not give
facts. Moron!!

Don't you have some innocent babies to kill today. Rip them from the
womb before their day in court?

+1

On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 8:51:17 PM UTC-4, Ashton Crusher wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 13:07:29 -0700, T wrote:

On 09/25/2015 12:06 PM, Gordon Shumway wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 11:43:14 -0700, T wrote:

Boehner resigned! YIPPEE !!!!!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/...l?intcmp=hpbt1

That news is almost as good as the news will be of a federal grand
jury returning a federal indictment on Hillary.

One can only hope.


Never going to happen. Democrats are above the law in this country.

By all rights half of the departments heads should be in jail, starting
with Learner.

I do believe the term is "Elite Privilege"

The "rule of law" needs to be re-established. I won't hold my
breath.

Which two candidates are the most likely to re-establish a rule of law
and get rid of the elites....


Trump or Bernie. None of the others will. The others will just
settle in to business as usual.

Trump can't get rid of the elites. Trump is the elite of elites.

On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 09:15:36 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 8:51:17 PM UTC-4, Ashton Crusher wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 13:07:29 -0700, T wrote:

On 09/25/2015 12:06 PM, Gordon Shumway wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 11:43:14 -0700, T wrote:

Boehner resigned! YIPPEE !!!!!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/...l?intcmp=hpbt1

That news is almost as good as the news will be of a federal grand
jury returning a federal indictment on Hillary.

One can only hope.


Never going to happen. Democrats are above the law in this country.

By all rights half of the departments heads should be in jail, starting
with Learner.

I do believe the term is "Elite Privilege"

The "rule of law" needs to be re-established. I won't hold my
breath.

Which two candidates are the most likely to re-establish a rule of law
and get rid of the elites....


Trump or Bernie. None of the others will. The others will just
settle in to business as usual.

Trump can't get rid of the elites. Trump is the elite of elites

Elite is your term, not mine. All the other elites have bought
someone to run for them. Which would you rather have, your elite out
in the open taking responsibility for their actions or your elite
hiding behind the current and pulling the strings. If I'm going to
have one, I'll take the HONEST one who isn't hiding. You also object
that Trump has revised his positions on some things as if thinking
about something based on new data is a bad quality. As the famous,
but unusually misquoted quote says.."FOOLISH consistency is the
hobgoblin of small minds." The rest of the clown car candidates
engaged in the kind of FOOLISH consistency you seem to champion.

On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 1:27:55 PM UTC-4, Ashton Crusher wrote:
You are free to believe whatever suits you.


It's not beliefs that I've cited, it's documented, readily available
well known facts on Trumps record. If anyone is operating on "beliefs"
it's guys like you and T. You believe what Trump says today as if it's
some kind of gospel, on the bizarre assumption that just because he
hasn't held office before, that makes him truthful, honest, etc.
What I've cited shows otherwise. Just the facts.

On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 1:34:58 PM UTC-4, Ashton Crusher wrote:


Trump can't get rid of the elites. Trump is the elite of elites

Elite is your term, not mine.


All the other elites have bought
someone to run for them.

Ok, so assuming that's true, then Trump has bought himself
because clearly he's an elite. And do you really think Trump is
going to screw all his elite buddies, that he doesn't have
sympathy for their causes, etc?


Which would you rather have, your elite out
in the open taking responsibility for their actions

Trump doesn't take responsibility for his actions. When he
slandered John McCain with the despicable comment that McCain
was not a war hero, then proceeded to insult all POWs by saying
that he likes the vets that weren't POWs, what did Trump do?
Man up and apologize? No, he lied and denied saying it, said
that it was taken out of context, etc. He does similar almost
every day. He's lying and attacking the CNN reporter who a
couple days ago as part of her coverage of his speech in SC
reported that there were a lot of empty seats. There were you
can see the video yourself. Trump attacked her, CNN, and again
he's totally wrong. That's being responsible? Again, just
the facts.



or your elite
hiding behind the current and pulling the strings. If I'm going to
have one, I'll take the HONEST one who isn't hiding. You also object
that Trump has revised his positions on some things as if thinking
about something based on new data is a bad quality.

What new data emerged on immigration in the last 3 years? The
last two months? Trumps positions were very different then.
Nothing changed, except he senses that the Trumpies want to hear
him sound tough on immigration. And I've raised this question so
many times, but not one Trumpy will answer it. His current policy is
to round up 11+ mil illegals, including their US born children that
are citizens, run them through immigration courts, ruin their lives,
ultimately deporting them. And then he freely states that he will
then "expedite" their return here legally. That makes sense to you?
If so, explain it and why spending $125 bil to run people out and
then bring them right back makes sense. It's one of the stupidest
things I've ever heard, not to mention that even Trump knows it's
never going to happen. It would rip the country apart.



As the famous,
but unusually misquoted quote says.."FOOLISH consistency is the
hobgoblin of small minds." The rest of the clown car candidates
engaged in the kind of FOOLISH consistency you seem to champion.

Yeah, better to have a narcissistic megalomaniac that starts
twitter wars at 3AM, attacking and insulting anyone and everyone,
than a candidate with consistent, logical, well thought out
positions. With regard to the latter, Trump has not a single
one. The only actual policy he has is on immigration. And as
I pointed out above, how it could make any sense to a thinking
person at all, is beyond me.

On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 11:19:40 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 1:34:58 PM UTC-4, Ashton Crusher wrote:


Trump can't get rid of the elites. Trump is the elite of elites

Elite is your term, not mine.


All the other elites have bought
someone to run for them.

Ok, so assuming that's true, then Trump has bought himself
because clearly he's an elite. And do you really think Trump is
going to screw all his elite buddies, that he doesn't have
sympathy for their causes, etc?


Which would you rather have, your elite out
in the open taking responsibility for their actions

Trump doesn't take responsibility for his actions. When he
slandered John McCain with the despicable comment that McCain
was not a war hero, then proceeded to insult all POWs by saying
that he likes the vets that weren't POWs, what did Trump do?
Man up and apologize? No, he lied and denied saying it, said
that it was taken out of context, etc. He does similar almost
every day. He's lying and attacking the CNN reporter who a
couple days ago as part of her coverage of his speech in SC
reported that there were a lot of empty seats. There were you
can see the video yourself. Trump attacked her, CNN, and again
he's totally wrong. That's being responsible? Again, just
the facts.



or your elite
hiding behind the current and pulling the strings. If I'm going to
have one, I'll take the HONEST one who isn't hiding. You also object
that Trump has revised his positions on some things as if thinking
about something based on new data is a bad quality.

What new data emerged on immigration in the last 3 years? The
last two months? Trumps positions were very different then.
Nothing changed, except he senses that the Trumpies want to hear
him sound tough on immigration. And I've raised this question so
many times, but not one Trumpy will answer it. His current policy is
to round up 11+ mil illegals, including their US born children that
are citizens, run them through immigration courts, ruin their lives,
ultimately deporting them. And then he freely states that he will
then "expedite" their return here legally. That makes sense to you?
If so, explain it and why spending $125 bil to run people out and
then bring them right back makes sense. It's one of the stupidest
things I've ever heard, not to mention that even Trump knows it's
never going to happen. It would rip the country apart.



As the famous,
but unusually misquoted quote says.."FOOLISH consistency is the
hobgoblin of small minds." The rest of the clown car candidates
engaged in the kind of FOOLISH consistency you seem to champion.

Yeah, better to have a narcissistic megalomaniac that starts
twitter wars at 3AM, attacking and insulting anyone and everyone,
than a candidate with consistent, logical, well thought out
positions. With regard to the latter, Trump has not a single
one. The only actual policy he has is on immigration. And as
I pointed out above, how it could make any sense to a thinking
person at all, is beyond me.

If I had a Tweeter account I would be all over Trump. Let him insult
me. I don't care. Trump is an idiot. He may be smart, but he not the
person to serve as our president. His acolytes should pay attention.
--
Liberals are like Chameleons. They keep changing colors. -- © Oren

On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 12:34:58 PM UTC-5, Ashton Crusher wrote:
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 09:15:36 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 8:51:17 PM UTC-4, Ashton Crusher wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 13:07:29 -0700, T wrote:

On 09/25/2015 12:06 PM, Gordon Shumway wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 11:43:14 -0700, T wrote:

Boehner resigned! YIPPEE !!!!!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/...l?intcmp=hpbt1

That news is almost as good as the news will be of a federal grand
jury returning a federal indictment on Hillary.

One can only hope.


Never going to happen. Democrats are above the law in this country.

By all rights half of the departments heads should be in jail, starting
with Learner.

I do believe the term is "Elite Privilege"

The "rule of law" needs to be re-established. I won't hold my
breath.

Which two candidates are the most likely to re-establish a rule of law
and get rid of the elites....


Trump or Bernie. None of the others will. The others will just
settle in to business as usual.

Trump can't get rid of the elites. Trump is the elite of elites

Elite is your term, not mine. All the other elites have bought
someone to run for them. Which would you rather have, your elite out
in the open taking responsibility for their actions or your elite
hiding behind the current and pulling the strings. If I'm going to
have one, I'll take the HONEST one who isn't hiding. You also object
that Trump has revised his positions on some things as if thinking
about something based on new data is a bad quality. As the famous,
but unusually misquoted quote says.."FOOLISH consistency is the
hobgoblin of small minds." The rest of the clown car candidates
engaged in the kind of FOOLISH consistency you seem to champion.

I thought you had a right to change your mind? Especially after you are confronted with the truth. Sometimes it takes a while for a young person to grow up, see the light and acquire Conservative principles. Sometimes people are well into adulthood before they experience political puberty. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Adult Monster

On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 1:35:59 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 11:19:40 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 1:34:58 PM UTC-4, Ashton Crusher wrote:


Trump can't get rid of the elites. Trump is the elite of elites

Elite is your term, not mine.


All the other elites have bought
someone to run for them.

Ok, so assuming that's true, then Trump has bought himself
because clearly he's an elite. And do you really think Trump is
going to screw all his elite buddies, that he doesn't have
sympathy for their causes, etc?


Which would you rather have, your elite out
in the open taking responsibility for their actions

Trump doesn't take responsibility for his actions. When he
slandered John McCain with the despicable comment that McCain
was not a war hero, then proceeded to insult all POWs by saying
that he likes the vets that weren't POWs, what did Trump do?
Man up and apologize? No, he lied and denied saying it, said
that it was taken out of context, etc. He does similar almost
every day. He's lying and attacking the CNN reporter who a
couple days ago as part of her coverage of his speech in SC
reported that there were a lot of empty seats. There were you
can see the video yourself. Trump attacked her, CNN, and again
he's totally wrong. That's being responsible? Again, just
the facts.



or your elite
hiding behind the current and pulling the strings. If I'm going to
have one, I'll take the HONEST one who isn't hiding. You also object
that Trump has revised his positions on some things as if thinking
about something based on new data is a bad quality.

What new data emerged on immigration in the last 3 years? The
last two months? Trumps positions were very different then.
Nothing changed, except he senses that the Trumpies want to hear
him sound tough on immigration. And I've raised this question so
many times, but not one Trumpy will answer it. His current policy is
to round up 11+ mil illegals, including their US born children that
are citizens, run them through immigration courts, ruin their lives,
ultimately deporting them. And then he freely states that he will
then "expedite" their return here legally. That makes sense to you?
If so, explain it and why spending $125 bil to run people out and
then bring them right back makes sense. It's one of the stupidest
things I've ever heard, not to mention that even Trump knows it's
never going to happen. It would rip the country apart.



As the famous,
but unusually misquoted quote says.."FOOLISH consistency is the
hobgoblin of small minds." The rest of the clown car candidates
engaged in the kind of FOOLISH consistency you seem to champion.

Yeah, better to have a narcissistic megalomaniac that starts
twitter wars at 3AM, attacking and insulting anyone and everyone,
than a candidate with consistent, logical, well thought out
positions. With regard to the latter, Trump has not a single
one. The only actual policy he has is on immigration. And as
I pointed out above, how it could make any sense to a thinking
person at all, is beyond me.

If I had a Tweeter account I would be all over Trump. Let him insult
me. I don't care. Trump is an idiot. He may be smart, but he not the
person to serve as our president. His acolytes should pay attention.
--


Trump is actually performing a public service, he's energizing the people and rattling the cages of establishment politicians. Their cages must be hosed out more frequently because Trump scares the crap out of them. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Cage Monster

On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 11:50:39 -0700 (PDT), Uncle Monster
wrote:

Trump is actually performing a public service, he's energizing the people and rattling the cages of establishment politicians. Their cages must be hosed out more frequently because Trump scares the crap out of them. ^_^

So is Cruz, if people listen. He coined the phrase the "Washington
Cartel". Comparing them to a bunch of miscreants, stink eyes,
hooligans and recalcitrant individuals. (my words)

I'd have to pinch my nose voting for Trump.

On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 2:40:14 PM UTC-4, Uncle Monster wrote:


I thought you had a right to change your mind? Especially after you are confronted with the truth. Sometimes it takes a while for a young person to grow up, see the light and acquire Conservative principles. Sometimes people are well into adulthood before they experience political puberty. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Adult Monster

Sure, it's OK to change your mind, but when it happens so many
times and the changes are complete 180's, even with a month,
surely it raises questions. The timing is also important. If
someone changed their mind on something 20 years ago or 10 years
ago, and has been consistent since then, that's one thing.
If they changed it a year ago or a month
ago, just before running for office, that suggests something
different. In Trump's case, he only registered as a Republican
in 2012. He spent most of the 2000 decade as a registered Democrat.
In the period back to 2000, he's been a Democrat, an Independent,
a Reform Party candidate, a no party affiliation voter and now he
say's he's a Republican. Is there any other candidate in history
for president that joined the party just 3 years before running?

He's done similar on his signature item, immigration, see my other
post. Real change is one thing, faking it, telling supporters what
they want to hear is another. The ironic thing here is that the
Trumpies yell "Rino" when any established Republican has even the
most minor deviation from what they consider to be acceptable
conservative positions and they denounce them. Yet, Trump just by
the above, by any reasonable standards, is clearly the biggest
Rino of all.

On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 11:40:07 -0700 (PDT), Uncle Monster

I thought you had a right to change your mind? Especially after you are confronted with the truth.

Ask Hillary about that notion. She won't agree.

On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 12:19:57 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

In Trump's case, he only registered as a Republican
in 2012. He spent most of the 2000 decade as a registered Democrat.
In the period back to 2000, he's been a Democrat, an Independent,
a Reform Party candidate, a no party affiliation voter and now he
say's he's a Republican. Is there any other candidate in history
for president that joined the party just 3 years before running?

Trump is trying to sell you a used car with sawdust in the
transmission...

On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 2:03:42 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 11:50:39 -0700 (PDT), Uncle Monster
wrote:

Trump is actually performing a public service, he's energizing the people and rattling the cages of establishment politicians. Their cages must be hosed out more frequently because Trump scares the crap out of them. ^_^

So is Cruz, if people listen. He coined the phrase the "Washington
Cartel". Comparing them to a bunch of miscreants, stink eyes,
hooligans and recalcitrant individuals. (my words)

I'd have to pinch my nose voting for Trump.

The lesser of two evils? It's a shame it's come to the point in this country that a candidate solicits votes by claiming he/she/it not as bad as the other candidate. A regular demonic beauty contest. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Evil Monster

On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 2:53:42 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 11:40:07 -0700 (PDT), Uncle Monster

I thought you had a right to change your mind? Especially after you are confronted with the truth.

Ask Hillary about that notion. She won't agree.

Women never change their minds, although they often lose them. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Misogynist Monster

On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 13:25:13 -0700 (PDT), Uncle Monster
wrote:

On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 2:53:42 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 11:40:07 -0700 (PDT), Uncle Monster

I thought you had a right to change your mind? Especially after you are confronted with the truth.

Ask Hillary about that notion. She won't agree.

Women never change their minds, although they often lose them. ^_^


Glad I made my point. Who gets to strip search her looking in a body
cavity? Make her cough and grunt...
_
_Hillary For Prison 2016_

On 9/26/15 4:33 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
Bob, you and your fellow Progressive Liberal Leftist Commiecrat Freaks show your true colors whenever confronted with someone who can expose you for what piles of excrement you really are. ^_^

Good on ya', Monster.

Call 'em for what they are -- communists, plain and simple.

Communists.

Oren wrote:
On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:22:41 -0700, "Bob F"
wrote:

Your words make it clear just what kind of excrement you are. You
don't need any help making that clear. What a moron!.


You sound just like Trump and Hillary. Attack the person and not give
facts. Moron!!

Don't you have some innocent babies to kill today. Rip them from the
womb before their day in court?

There's another one - just like the other one. Looser!

Uncle Monster wrote:
On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 5:22:46 PM UTC-5, Bob F wrote:
Uncle Monster wrote:
On Saturday, September 26, 2015 at 12:27:36 AM UTC-5, Bob F wrote:
T wrote:
On 09/25/2015 02:35 PM, Oren wrote:
If elected I will not run.

Huh. Are we starting to see a crack open up.

"If elected I will not run" means you won't run
from your duty if elected. Much better than it
your previous denials.

You know I am only joking. Maybe not completely.

Sarah P was elected, and then ran, never to finish her term.

Those of your ilk were so terrified of Sara Palin that paid
operatives were sent to Alaska to attack her anyway they could such
as bringing numerous frivolous ethics complaints against her in
order to disrupt her job as governor and to bring financial ruin to
her family. Governor Palin resigned because of the large amount of
state money and resources it took to beat the legal ethics
complaints in court. I was amazed at how scared the Left was of
Sara Palin that they thought it necessary to do whatever they could
to harm her and her family. Making fun of her special needs infant
son was another nasty tactic used by the Left in an attempt to hurt
her. Bob, you and your fellow Progressive Liberal Leftist
Commiecrat Freaks show your true colors whenever confronted with
someone who can expose you for what piles of excrement you really
are. ^_^

When I heard McCain had selected Sarah, I celebrated.

Your words make it clear just what kind of excrement you are. You
don't need any help making that clear. What a moron!.

Let me see, first those of your ilk attack those who oppose you as
being stupid because you believe you're are the smartest people on
Earth. Then you go on to calling everyone "racist" if they don't
agree with you until finally resorting to calling your opponents
"Nazi". If you're so smart, why is it you don't know that you're
using the tactics of your progenitors, the Nazis. ^_^

Here's a little clue for you. I'm not a drooling Palin supporter, I
just don't like the way you people treated her. ^_^

LOL!

Pot calling the kettle black. Rightards ALWAY accuse liberals of EXACTLY their
own worst faults. And they always write like complete morons.

How EXACTLY did I treat her? Not some fanaticized lib - ME?

John Albert wrote:
On 9/26/15 4:33 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
Bob, you and your fellow Progressive Liberal Leftist Commiecrat
Freaks show your true colors whenever confronted with someone who
can expose you for what piles of excrement you really are. ^_^

Good on ya', Monster.

Call 'em for what they are -- communists, plain and simple.

Communists.

LOL! Still living in the friggin 50's.

How's your best friend Joseph McCarthy?

This group is overrun with rightard morons.

On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 3:38:13 PM UTC-5, John Albert wrote:
On 9/26/15 4:33 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
Bob, you and your fellow Progressive Liberal Leftist Commiecrat Freaks show your true colors whenever confronted with someone who can expose you for what piles of excrement you really are. ^_^

Good on ya', Monster.

Call 'em for what they are -- communists, plain and simple.

Communists.

I use P.L.L.C.F. because I don't want to be rude and leave anyone out. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Polite Monster

On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 17:50:40 -0700, "Bob F"
wrote:

There's another one - just like the other one. Looser!

Can you answer what I asked, bone head?

How do you get a T-shirt over your massive ego? I bet your big head
gets stuck in a door jamb.
--
"Dodgeball in Burkas" -- Greg Gutfeld

bernie sanders wants to roll everyone into medicare, now thats a great idea

On 09/28/2015 10:54 PM, bob haller wrote:
bernie sanders wants to roll everyone into medicare, now thats a great idea


Would you like fries with that?

Over 75% of medical care cost could be eliminated if people ate a proper diet...
which implies taxpayers could slash 75% off their health care premiums.

On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 4:21:07 AM UTC-4, Al Z Heimers wrote:
On 09/28/2015 10:54 PM, bob haller wrote:
bernie sanders wants to roll everyone into medicare, now thats a great idea


Would you like fries with that?

Over 75% of medical care cost could be eliminated if people ate a proper diet...
which implies taxpayers could slash 75% off their health care premiums.

And the govt knows the proper diet, right? It was the govt that
told us how bad natural fat was and that trans fat was so much
better. People switched from butter to margarine for 25 years.
Transfats went into most commercial baked goods.
Now it turns out that the govt is banning trans fats as one of
the worst things ever. At the same
time, govt told us how we should be loading up on carbs, that bread,
pasta and cereal were good, meat was bad. Eat those carbs instead
of protein and fat and you won't get fat. Now with America in the
middle of an obesity epidemic, that govt edict is out the window too.

On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 19:54:52 -0700 (PDT), bob haller
wrote:

bernie sanders wants to roll everyone into medicare, now thats a great idea

I sure hope you vote for him, vote as many times as you can.

On 09/29/2015 08:32 AM, Oren wrote:
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 19:54:52 -0700 (PDT), bob haller
wrote:

bernie sanders wants to roll everyone into medicare, now thats a great idea

I sure hope you vote for him, vote as many times as you can.


I don't think Bernie is serious about running. He is just
having fun clowning around and enjoying the attention.

If he was serious, he would register as a Democrat. (It is
really easy to do, the vomiting part clears up in a week
or two).

As it stands, all votes for him are invalid. They mean
nothing, except for the symbolism. And I think that is
his point.

Did you hear where Trump called Open Borders Rubio
the RINO a "clown" on immigration? Talk about
a guy who is bought and paid for.

I had a good laugh.