Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#201
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now....
In article ,
PaPaPeng wrote: I'd like to restate my point as "There is no point building a car like a tank aka Detroit Iron." Japan had this must scrap law at least 30 years ago. In their crowded roads and limited land there were several public policy decisions that led to the laws. The environmental one of course is to remove older cars off the roads. Older cars have lower fuel efficiency, contribute to air pollution as well as road pollution from oil drips. Then there are safety concerns as older cars tend to be less well maintained yet requiring more maintenance. The economic one is to keep Japan's car production lines open and provide a large domestic market for new models over shorter model change cycles. That would never fly in the US, although the automakers and UAW might like the law. Heck we are getting all in a lather over here about subsidizing High Def TV converters when the change comes about so people's TVs don't become obsolete. I can only imagine the hooha about trying to take older cars off the road and out of the hands of the poor, etc. |
#202
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now....
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 09:59:48 -0400, Kurt Ullman
wrote: That would never fly in the US, although the automakers and UAW might like the law. Heck we are getting all in a lather over here about subsidizing High Def TV converters when the change comes about so people's TVs don't become obsolete. I can only imagine the hooha about trying to take older cars off the road and out of the hands of the poor, etc. ....and rightfully so. The US has a significant love affair with some of our classic and older cars. Even some of the brand new models are styled like cars from generations past. A desire for certain aspects of the past is a permanent epidemic here. The government does a lot of silly things here, but taking away older cars is unlikely to ever be one of them. Bernardo |
#203
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now....
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 09:59:48 -0400, Kurt Ullman
wrote: In article , PaPaPeng wrote: I'd like to restate my point as "There is no point building a car like a tank aka Detroit Iron." Japan had this must scrap law at least 30 years ago. In their crowded roads and limited land there were several public policy decisions that led to the laws. The environmental one of course is to remove older cars off the roads. Older cars have lower fuel efficiency, contribute to air pollution as well as road pollution from oil drips. Then there are safety concerns as older cars tend to be less well maintained yet requiring more maintenance. The economic one is to keep Japan's car production lines open and provide a large domestic market for new models over shorter model change cycles. That would never fly in the US, although the automakers and UAW might like the law. Heck we are getting all in a lather over here about subsidizing High Def TV converters when the change comes about so people's TVs don't become obsolete. I can only imagine the hooha about trying to take older cars off the road and out of the hands of the poor, etc. There are quite a few societal consequences on car ownership that comes to mind. I can only describe them as they arise. I don't have that much interest in cars in general to make the link. In the crowded Asian lands the limiting factor on car ownership is an affordable long term parking spot at home and at the office that will enable one to drive to work. If you live in NY or London you'll grasp the picture instantly. Japan has her particular problems. Arable land is scarce. Large City properties are very expensive and their apartment building structure limited by earthquake concerns. Townships are therefore built on less valuable land so far out that a two hour one way commute by Bullet Train is not uncommon. Job expectations entails a lot of unrecorded and unpaid overtime. Then there is that obligatory (work related) male bonding at the bar after that. It will be a rare occasion that our salaryman gets home earlier than midnight. He of course has to get ready for the next day's grind at 4 or 5 am. I don't know how many hours there are in his day but they have to add up to more than 24. Its no wonder that the birth rate in Japan is so low that they have a cabinet level minister for making babies. We hear of Japan's raqpidly ageing population that will be 40 per cent of her population by 2035 or something like that. When Japanese men travel abroad for vacations you get the horniest invasion into the fleshpots of Bangkok, Vietnam, the Philippines and of late, China. They are picky about skin color. Not to have a car in Singapore or Hongkong is not that big a deal as both are just big cities and have very good public transit connections. In China city parking space is a problem. Labor is so cheap and plentiful that all legal parking spots are guarded by uniformed private guards. Yet the very wide city streets are jam-packed. The car problems in China's cities have arisen only in the past 10 years. It had always been a bicycle and bus cities where almost everyone lives close to work. There are no sprawling suburban bedroom communities. The Beijing municipal authority (with powers equivalent to a full province) does not allow ostentatious single family homes. All land is owned by the State and leased for private home developers for 60 years. Commercial properties may have only 30 year leases with an option for 30 more. The premise is that by 30 years the land will be far more valuable for an even grander building. This also means that the city planning authorities and potential investors can take the grand long term view to redevelop whole districts without having to worry about the ownership rights piecemeal. This power of appropriation is applied very judiciously. Public transit by bus and subway is extensive and very cheap. The bus fare is only 1 yuan (7 1/2 cents) from terminus to terminus. China is on a highway and high speed railway construction binge. If the Beijing airport highway and the other Beijing highways are any indication they are of top grade construction, better than any I have driven on in North America. There is some nightlife in the big cities, but not much. All remaining major businesses close at 9 pm. The buses stop running at 10 pm. Everyone gets to go to bed at a sensible time. For nightbirds, taxis are very cheap. Crime is very low but not unknown. Single young ladies (walking their pet dogs) and old ladies often go about alone after 10 pm. |
#204
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now....
In article ,
PaPaPeng wrote: In China city parking space is a problem. Labor is so cheap and plentiful that all legal parking spots are guarded by uniformed private guards. Yet the very wide city streets are jam-packed. The car problems in China's cities have arisen only in the past 10 years. Heck, the last couple of times I've been to Beijing, you couldn't hardly find places to park a bicycle, let alone a car. |
#205
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now....
In article , h wrote:
"PaPaPeng" wrote in message One more point. In China private cars MUST be scrapped at 10 years. Taxis at 8 years. There is no point making cars that will last 20 years or good for say 300,000 miles. That's totally insane. I'm in my 50s, and I have NEVER bought a car that wasn't at least 10 years old with around 150,000 miles, and I usually keep them for 5-8 years. Do the Chinese just make **** cars or is the government populated only by control freaks? Both. -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com) It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again. |
#206
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.home.repair,alt.fan.cecil-adams
|
|||
|
|||
Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now....
In article , h wrote:
I wouldn't drive German or American if you gave it to me free. Since Subaru has started making cars in the USA I may have to change brands for my next car, although that's at least 8 years away. I'd wait and see what happens. Subaru plant in Lafayette, IN area has impressed the honchoes with their quality to the point that they sent a group to JAPAN to help them open up a new plant there. |
#207
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.home.repair,alt.fan.cecil-adams
|
|||
|
|||
Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now....
On Sep 21, 7:56 pm, wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:41:09 -0700, Too_Many_Tools wrote: On Sep 19, 6:55 pm, Lee Ayrton wrote: On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Ignoramus29233 wrote: On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:00:26 -0400, Kurt Ullman wrote: In article , Ignoramus29233 wrote: On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:47:03 -0700, Too_Many_Tools wrote: Why can't the company making $50 shovels make $5 shovels too? Typically, the reason for doing so is maintaining a "premium brand identity", which makes perfect sense. Many do. For instance, many of the store brand products you see in target or even WalMart are made by the same guys and gals who make the "brand name" thing you see right next to it. I also tend to think that if Walmart has products of Company X on its shelves, then their stuff is probably not worth buying, even not from Walmart. Perhaps not or, at least, not from Wal*Mart. It has long been claimed that Wal*Mart's ability to dictate price to suppliers sometimes causes manufacturers to compromise on quality or features in order to stay in business, and the volume of the order makes bottom-line-this quarter sense to make a production run with deleted features or second-run parts. For instance: Levis. See:http://www.cio.com/article/31948/Sup...ips_How_Levi_s... -- "We began to realize, as we plowed on with the destruction of New Jersey, that the extent of our American lunatic fringe had been underestimated." Orson Wells on the reaction to the _War Of The Worlds_ broadcast.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - There was a business life before Walmart. If a company doesn't like the business practices of Walmart, they can make the business decision to find customers elsewhere. The whining of companies about Walmart's business practice is a red herring. TMT Walmart is simply doing what a vast number of Americans want - selling a low quality item for a cheap price. If they weren't doing exactly that then they wouldn't be a success. You don't get to be a 900 lb. gorilla by selling a product that the public doesn't want at a price higher then he is willing to pay. All over the world there are companies selling quality albeit at a higher price then Walmart. Rolex Watch comes to mind - a really well made watch for a substantial price. I don't believe that Walmart has harmed their business at all. Mercedes, Gucci, I could go on and on, but quality merchandize is there if one wants to buy it. There is an old saying in Asia, "you pay peanuts, you get monkeys". The same can be applied to merchandize, "you buy cheap, you get cheap". Bruce in Bangkok (brucepaigeATgmailDOTcom)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Walmart is simply doing what a vast number of Americans want - selling a low quality item for a cheap price. If they weren't doing exactly that then they wouldn't be a success. Agreed on their success...let them continue to sell poisoned products and see if that success continues.... All over the world there are companies selling quality albeit at a higher price then Walmart. Rolex Watch comes to mind - a really well made watch for a substantial price. I don't believe that Walmart has harmed their business at all. Mercedes, Gucci, I could go on and on, but quality merchandize is there if one wants to buy it. Rolex watches don't poison people and pets. As for buying overpriced merchandise, there are many consumers with money and no brains. TMT |
#208
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.home.repair,alt.fan.cecil-adams
|
|||
|
|||
Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now....
On Sep 21, 8:25 pm, jim wrote:
On Sep 21, 7:56 pm, wrote: On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:41:09 -0700, Too_Many_Tools wrote: On Sep 19, 6:55 pm, Lee Ayrton wrote: On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Ignoramus29233 wrote: On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:00:26 -0400, Kurt Ullman wrote: In article , Ignoramus29233 wrote: On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:47:03 -0700, Too_Many_Tools wrote: Why can't the company making $50 shovels make $5 shovels too? Typically, the reason for doing so is maintaining a "premium brand identity", which makes perfect sense. Many do. For instance, many of the store brand products you see in target or even WalMart are made by the same guys and gals who make the "brand name" thing you see right next to it. I also tend to think that if Walmart has products of Company X on its shelves, then their stuff is probably not worth buying, even not from Walmart. Perhaps not or, at least, not from Wal*Mart. It has long been claimed that Wal*Mart's ability to dictate price to suppliers sometimes causes manufacturers to compromise on quality or features in order to stay in business, and the volume of the order makes bottom-line-this quarter sense to make a production run with deleted features or second-run parts. For instance: Levis. See:http://www.cio.com/article/31948/Sup...ips_How_Levi_s... -- "We began to realize, as we plowed on with the destruction of New Jersey, that the extent of our American lunatic fringe had been underestimated." Orson Wells on the reaction to the _War Of The Worlds_ broadcast.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - There was a business life before Walmart. If a company doesn't like the business practices of Walmart, they can make the business decision to find customers elsewhere. The whining of companies about Walmart's business practice is a red herring. TMT Walmart is simply doing what a vast number of Americans want - selling a low quality item for a cheap price. If they weren't doing exactly that then they wouldn't be a success. You don't get to be a 900 lb. gorilla by selling a product that the public doesn't want at a price higher then he is willing to pay. All over the world there are companies selling quality albeit at a higher price then Walmart. Rolex Watch comes to mind - a really well made watch for a substantial price. I don't believe that Walmart has harmed their business at all. Mercedes, Gucci, I could go on and on, but quality merchandize is there if one wants to buy it. There is an old saying in Asia, "you pay peanuts, you get monkeys". The same can be applied to merchandize, "you buy cheap, you get cheap". Bruce in Bangkok (brucepaigeATgmailDOTcom)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - As some one who works in the home improvement field Retail consumers want cheap as I hear it every day and China produces cheap and with low Quality . You get what you pay for people nothing more if it is cheaper it is.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Cheap is one thing....deadly is another. If you sold a product that kills the buyers, how long will you be in business? TMT |
#209
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.home.repair,alt.fan.cecil-adams
|
|||
|
|||
Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now....
In article om,
Too_Many_Tools wrote: If you sold a product that kills the buyers, how long will you be in business? Ask the cigarette companies. I guess the secret it not to kill too quickly. |
#210
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.home.repair,alt.fan.cecil-adams
|
|||
|
|||
Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now....
on 9/24/2007 12:26 PM Too_Many_Tools said the following:
On Sep 21, 8:25 pm, jim wrote: On Sep 21, 7:56 pm, wrote: On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:41:09 -0700, Too_Many_Tools wrote: On Sep 19, 6:55 pm, Lee Ayrton wrote: On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Ignoramus29233 wrote: On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:00:26 -0400, Kurt Ullman wrote: In article , Ignoramus29233 wrote: On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:47:03 -0700, Too_Many_Tools wrote: Why can't the company making $50 shovels make $5 shovels too? Typically, the reason for doing so is maintaining a "premium brand identity", which makes perfect sense. Many do. For instance, many of the store brand products you see in target or even WalMart are made by the same guys and gals who make the "brand name" thing you see right next to it. I also tend to think that if Walmart has products of Company X on its shelves, then their stuff is probably not worth buying, even not from Walmart. Perhaps not or, at least, not from Wal*Mart. It has long been claimed that Wal*Mart's ability to dictate price to suppliers sometimes causes manufacturers to compromise on quality or features in order to stay in business, and the volume of the order makes bottom-line-this quarter sense to make a production run with deleted features or second-run parts. For instance: Levis. See:http://www.cio.com/article/31948/Sup...ips_How_Levi_s... -- "We began to realize, as we plowed on with the destruction of New Jersey, that the extent of our American lunatic fringe had been underestimated." Orson Wells on the reaction to the _War Of The Worlds_ broadcast.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - There was a business life before Walmart. If a company doesn't like the business practices of Walmart, they can make the business decision to find customers elsewhere. The whining of companies about Walmart's business practice is a red herring. TMT Walmart is simply doing what a vast number of Americans want - selling a low quality item for a cheap price. If they weren't doing exactly that then they wouldn't be a success. You don't get to be a 900 lb. gorilla by selling a product that the public doesn't want at a price higher then he is willing to pay. All over the world there are companies selling quality albeit at a higher price then Walmart. Rolex Watch comes to mind - a really well made watch for a substantial price. I don't believe that Walmart has harmed their business at all. Mercedes, Gucci, I could go on and on, but quality merchandize is there if one wants to buy it. There is an old saying in Asia, "you pay peanuts, you get monkeys". The same can be applied to merchandize, "you buy cheap, you get cheap". Bruce in Bangkok (brucepaigeATgmailDOTcom)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - As some one who works in the home improvement field Retail consumers want cheap as I hear it every day and China produces cheap and with low Quality . You get what you pay for people nothing more if it is cheaper it is.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Cheap is one thing....deadly is another. If you sold a product that kills the buyers, how long will you be in business? TMT Cigarette manufacturers have been in business a long time. -- Bill In Hamptonburgh, NY To email, remove the double zeroes after @ |
#211
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.home.repair,alt.fan.cecil-adams
|
|||
|
|||
Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now....
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 10:14:46 -0400, h wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:57:24 +0700, wrote: A toyota is for the proletariat... Bruce in Bangkok (brucepaigeATgmailDOTcom) Or for anyone who doesn't give a rodent's behind about cars or about what other people think. For me, a car gets me and my stuff from point A to point B. That's it. Why on earth would I spend money on something I don't care about? I'm 50, and I'm on my fourth car. I always buy 10 year old cars and keep them for 8-10 years. I've owned 2 Toyotas and I'm on my second Subaru. I wouldn't drive German or American if you gave it to me free. Since Subaru has started making cars in the USA I may have to change brands for my next car, although that's at least 8 years away. Doesn't have to be cars, can be anything. The point was that (to paraphrase) "quality" is very much in the eye of the beholder". If you need a tool to do one single repetition of a task and the cheap Chinese tool did it then for that example it was "quality", although it very likely would not be if you were going to use it continuously or for a long period. Back when I was much younger a chevrolet was deemed to be a "good" car in some parts of the U.S., while in other parts of the country a Plymouth was seen to be a much better vehicle even though if one disregarded the sheet metal they were very similar - six cylinder inline engines, 3 speed manual transmission, hydraulic brakes, etc., but people would argue for ever about which one was "better". Bruce in Bangkok (brucepaigeATgmailDOTcom) |
#212
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.home.repair,alt.fan.cecil-adams
|
|||
|
|||
Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now....
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:25:24 -0700, Too_Many_Tools
wrote: On Sep 21, 7:56 pm, wrote: On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:41:09 -0700, Too_Many_Tools Much snipped - Show quoted text - Walmart is simply doing what a vast number of Americans want - selling a low quality item for a cheap price. If they weren't doing exactly that then they wouldn't be a success. Agreed on their success...let them continue to sell poisoned products and see if that success continues.... All over the world there are companies selling quality albeit at a higher price then Walmart. Rolex Watch comes to mind - a really well made watch for a substantial price. I don't believe that Walmart has harmed their business at all. Mercedes, Gucci, I could go on and on, but quality merchandize is there if one wants to buy it. Rolex watches don't poison people and pets. As for buying overpriced merchandise, there are many consumers with money and no brains. TMT Sorry, I don't agree with you. Unless a substantial number of people are actually poisoned and die and criminal charges filed and headlines in the newspapers, TV, etc., I doubt that Walmart's business will suffer. If you don't believe me then go down to your local Walmart next Saturday and count the people coming out with bags of stuff. All the "news" about the lead paint and the dog food probably hasn't even made a glitch in their profit for the year. As for overpriced merchandise, again "quality" is very much in the mind of the user. In my mind Harbor Freight is a good example of a company that is selling overpriced goods but from reading this news group it appears that they are doing a booming business in the U.S. although I haven't been in a shop in S.E.A. that uses the kind of stuff that they sell. The Chinese do make industrial machinery that stands up to commercial use but it isn't sold through Harbor Freight. Bruce in Bangkok (brucepaigeATgmailDOTcom) |
#213
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.home.repair,alt.fan.cecil-adams
|
|||
|
|||
Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now....
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 09:26:45 -0700, Too_Many_Tools
wrote: On Sep 21, 8:25 pm, jim wrote: On Sep 21, 7:56 pm, wrote: Much snipped As some one who works in the home improvement field Retail consumers want cheap as I hear it every day and China produces cheap and with low Quality . You get what you pay for people nothing more if it is cheaper it is.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Cheap is one thing....deadly is another. If you sold a product that kills the buyers, how long will you be in business? TMT How many people has Walmart killed recently? Bruce in Bangkok (brucepaigeATgmailDOTcom) |
#214
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.home.repair,alt.fan.cecil-adams
|
|||
|
|||
Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now....
On Sep 17, 1:01 pm, "Noozer" wrote:
"I will pay more (for toys) because I know it will ensure safety," said Lisa Sallese, a Wilton, Conn., mother of a 7-month-old boy and a 2-year-old girl. "But it stinks. It should have been safe to begin with." ...and she pays twice as much for a insert well known toy company here toy instead of a Mattel toy, not knowing that both companies had stuff manufactured at the same plant inChina. Sounds like a WIN solution for the toy companies. They can double their prices, citing increased safety costs, while not actually doing anything to improve safety. EXACTLY. When my cats began to refuse their favorite store brand cat food, I switched to Iams. Guess what? That was poisoned, too, although I didn't know it until March. Now I just make their cat food. |
#215
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.home.repair,alt.fan.cecil-adams
|
|||
|
|||
Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now....
On Sep 16, 2:23 pm, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
On Sep 15, 10:29 pm, RickH wrote: On Sep 15, 8:36 pm, Jeff Wisnia wrote: Automotive fuses... Today's mail brought me a Safety Recall notice from Harbor Freight telling me to stop using, remove any in use, and return the 120 piece Mini-Blade Automotive Fuse Assortment I'd tacked onto an order I placed with them a few months ago, because getting 120 fuses for $4.99 seemed like a good deal. (TOO good a deal I guess...) They're paying the postage, will refund $4.99 and gave me a "$5.00 Off coupon" good till next February. The recall notice includes this explanation: "Specifically, manufacturing inconsistencies max exiat with the materials, connections or size of the fuse elements which could result in the fuses failing to protect the circuit from exessive current which could cause damage to a vehicle and possibly a fire." What's next folks? The fuse issue isn't as funny as the "Stove Bolt Assortment" I bought from Harbor Freight several years ago and stuck on the shelf. When I finally wanted to use eight matching fasteners rather than the onsies and twosies I can get from my "hell box" I went to that assortment, only to find that all the 10-24 nuts in it had missed the threading operation and had smooth bore holes in them. Just for ****s and grins I wrote a letter to HF and taped a couple of the unthreaded nuts to it. I described the problem and explained that I assumed the threads were on backorder and asked when they expected to ship them to me. I wasn't sure what that would get me, but figured someone might get a laugh out of it and maybe send me another box of fasteners. Unfortunatly, my letter was answered by some ditzy woman with no sense of humor because I all I got was a letter from her saying my complaint exceeded their allowable time limit for returns and there was nothing they could do about it now. Jeff -- Jeffry Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE) The speed of light is 1.98*10^14 fathoms per fortnight. Sounds like my Chinese kitchen faucet that lasted all of 3 days. I hear they are planning on importing a $9000 car to the US, the Cheri, those fuses should work in those. China can make things real cheap and fast, but they dont believe in QA departments.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The consumer IS the QA department. And the irony is that it is American companies that are selling the stuff to us. They are the ones who closed their eyes to this developing problem. And they are as usual trying to pass the buck to the supplier instead of taking responsiblity themselves. TMT- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh look...another recall...who would have thought? TMT Chinese-made jewelry and toys recalled By CHRISTINE SIMMONS, Associated Press Writer Wed Sep 26, 8:03 PM ET Toys and children's necklaces made in China were recalled Wednesday, including five more items from the popular Thomas & Friends Wooden Railway product line, because they contain dangerous levels of lead. RC2 Corp.'s "Knights of the Sword" series toys and some of its Thomas and Friends items, along with floor puppet theaters and gardening tools and chairs for children, were among the more than 601,000 toys and children's jewelry announced in the recall by the Consumer Product Safety Commission. The recalled toys contain high levels of lead in their surface paint, and the necklaces and jewelry sets contain excessive lead in some of their metal parts. Under current regulations, children's products found to have more than .06 percent lead accessible to users are subject to a recall. The government warned parents to make sure children are not playing or using any of the recalled products. This is the second recall from the Thomas & Friends product line after RC2 Corp. announced June 13 a recall of 1.5 million wooden railway toys. The company is recalling five items, totaling about 200,000 toys in all, of Thomas & Friends toys not included in the first recall. "I don't think consumers have seen the end to lead paint recalls," said Julie Vallese, a spokeswoman for the Consumer Product Safety Commission. "There's been a very concentrated, concerted effort by both the CPSC and the industry to do a top-to-bottom investigation of the products to make sure they are not in violation with any toy safety standards," said Vallese. "Today's recall is a result of that work." The recalls include: · About 23,500 more necklaces, bracelets and pendants imported by TOBY N.Y.C. of New York. This expands the company's recall of jewelry sets announced on Aug. 22. The recalled products were sold at T.J. Maxx, Marshalls, A.J. Wright, Cracker Barrel and Shopko stores nationwide from August 2006 through August 2007. For more information, call the company at 866-235-0588. · About 850 children's Spinning Wheel Necklace necklaces, produced by Rhode Island Novelty of Cumberland, R.I. The necklaces were sold nationwide from November 2006 through May 2007. For more information, call the company 800-528-5599 or visit its Web site at http://www.rinovelty..com. · Happy Giddy Gardening Tools and Children's Sunny Patch Chairs, imported by Target Corp. of Minneapolis, Minn. The recall involves 350,000 of the toys. The gardening tools and chairs were manufactured by Starite International Ltd. of Taiwan. The toys were sold nationwide from August 2006 through August 2007. For more information, contact Target at 800-440-0680 or visit its Web site at http://www.target.com. · About 200,000 Thomas and Friends Wood Railway Toys and 800 Britain's "Knights of the Sword" series toys, distributed by RC2 Corp., of Oak Brook, Ill. The five recalled Thomas and Friends items, sold nationwide from March 2003 through September 2007, include the all- black cargo car, toad vehicle, olive green sodor cargo box and all- green maple tree top and signal base accessories. The "Knights of the Sword" recalled toys products include three items: a mounted silver knight on a red horse with an ax; a mounted silver knight on a red horse with two hands on a raised weapon; and a mounted silver knight on a red horse with a lance. The products were sold at specialty toy stores nationwide from April 2004 through March 2006. For more information, contact RC2 at 866-725-4407 or visit the firm's Web site at http://recalls.rc2.com. · About 16,000 children's toy rakes imported by Jo-Ann Stores Inc., of Hudson, Ohio. The rakes, each about 24 inches long with a yellow duck head attached to the green handle, were sold only at Jo-Ann Fabric and Craft Stores from January 2007 from September 2007. For more information, contact the company at 888-739-4120, option 7, or visit the firm's Web site at http://www.joann.com/. · An estimated 10,000 Floor Puppet Theaters produced by Guidecraft Inc., of Englewood, N.J. The recalled puppet theaters, each with a chalkboard surface on the front and colored side panels, were sold nationwide in specialty toy stores, gift shops, catalogs and Web sites from June 2006 through August 2007. For more information, contact the company at 888-824-1308 or visit its Web site at http://www.guidecraft.com. ___ On the Net: Consumer Product Safety Commission: http://www.cpsc.gov. |
#216
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.home.repair,alt.fan.cecil-adams
|
|||
|
|||
Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now....
On Sep 15, 7:36 pm, Jeff Wisnia wrote:
Automotive fuses... Today's mail brought me a Safety Recall notice from Harbor Freight telling me to stop using, remove any in use, and return the 120 piece Mini-Blade Automotive Fuse Assortment I'd tacked onto an order I placed with them a few months ago, because getting 120 fuses for $4.99 seemed like a good deal. (TOO good a deal I guess...) They're paying the postage, will refund $4.99 and gave me a "$5.00 Off coupon" good till next February. The recall notice includes this explanation: "Specifically, manufacturing inconsistencies max exiat with the materials, connections or size of the fuse elements which could result in the fuses failing to protect the circuit from exessive current which could cause damage to a vehicle and possibly a fire." What's next folks? The fuse issue isn't as funny as the "Stove Bolt Assortment" I bought from Harbor Freight several years ago and stuck on the shelf. When I finally wanted to use eight matching fasteners rather than the onsies and twosies I can get from my "hell box" I went to that assortment, only to find that all the 10-24 nuts in it had missed the threading operation and had smooth bore holes in them. Just for ****s and grins I wrote a letter to HF and taped a couple of the unthreaded nuts to it. I described the problem and explained that I assumed the threads were on backorder and asked when they expected to ship them to me. I wasn't sure what that would get me, but figured someone might get a laugh out of it and maybe send me another box of fasteners. Unfortunatly, my letter was answered by some ditzy woman with no sense of humor because I all I got was a letter from her saying my complaint exceeded their allowable time limit for returns and there was nothing they could do about it now. Jeff -- Jeffry Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE) The speed of light is 1.98*10^14 fathoms per fortnight. Check this out....the time for a new Administration is long overdue. TMT October 30, 2007 Bigger Budget? No, Responds Safety Agency By STEPHEN LABATON WASHINGTON, Oct. 29 - The nation's top official for consumer product safety has asked Congress in recent days to reject legislation intended to strengthen the agency, which polices thousands of consumer goods, from toys to tools. On the eve of an important Senate committee meeting to consider the legislation, Nancy A. Nord, the acting chairwoman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, has asked lawmakers in two letters not to approve the bulk of legislation that would increase the agency's authority, double its budget and sharply increase its dwindling staff. Ms. Nord opposes provisions that would increase the maximum penalties for safety violations and make it easier for the government to make public reports of faulty products, protect industry whistle-blowers and prosecute executives of companies that willfully violate laws. The measure is an effort to buttress an agency that has been under siege because of a raft of tainted and dangerous products manufactured both domestically and abroad. In the last two months alone, more than 13 million toys have been recalled after tests indicated lead levels that sometimes reached almost 200 times the safety limit. Ms. Nord's opposition to important elements of the legislation is consistent with the broadly deregulatory approach of the Bush administration over the last seven years. In a variety of areas, from antitrust to trucking and worker safety, officials appointed by President Bush have sought to reduce the role of regulation and government in the marketplace. Tony Fratto, a White House spokesman, said that Ms. Nord had not coordinated her effort to kill the legislation with the White House. But he said that the administration shared many of her concerns and that Allan Hubbard, President Bush's top economic adviser at the White House, was preparing to send a letter to Congress "that is probably even more forceful than Ms. Nord's." The Senate Commerce Committee is set to vote on Tuesday on the legislation, which is sponsored by Senator Daniel K. Inouye, the Hawaii Democrat who heads the committee, and Senator Mark Pryor, the Arkansas Democrat who heads the consumer affairs subcommittee. It would more than double the agency's budget, to $141 million, over the next seven years, raise staffing levels by about 20 percent, and give the commission broad new powers to police the marketplace. It would raise the cap on the maximum penalties to $100 million, from $1.8 million. Ms. Nord, who before joining the agency had been a lawyer at Eastman Kodak and an official at the United States Chamber of Commerce, criticized the measure in letters sent late last week and on Monday afternoon to the Democratic leaders of the committee. She was critical, for instance, of a provision to ban lead from all toys, saying it was not practical. She said that the proposal to raise the potential penalty to $100 million "may have the undesired consequence of firms, as a precautionary measure, flooding the agency with virtually every consumer complaint and incident." Her concern, she said, was that the increase in complaints would so overwhelm the commission that, "true safety issues would go unrecognized in the process." She also criticized a provision that would give state prosecutors the authority to enforce the federal consumer safety laws. Manufacturers had agreed to another provision that would assign independent laboratories to test and certify the safety of products, rather than the agency. But Ms. Nord said she objected to the provision. She preferred that the agency determine the conditions for using independent laboratories. Some of Ms. Nord's complaints were similar to the ones that business groups and manufacturers have raised, including that the legislation would be unnecessarily burdensome. But in other areas, like whistle- blower protection, her complaints went beyond those of industry. While companies generally have not objected to giving protection to whistle-blowers in the industries regulated by the commission, for example, she said it would "dramatically drain the limited resources of the commission, to the direct detriment of public safety." While Ms. Nord said she supported the committee's efforts in general, she issued a more modest proposal than the one under consideration in the Senate. It would, among other things, increase the maximum amount of civil penalties to $10 million, create incentives for companies to halt sales of recalled products quickly, and give the government the authority to seize assets of a company found to have violated criminal safety laws. Senator Pryor said Ms. Nord's objections surprised him. "It's hard for me to know if it's just ideological or she is just expressing the wishes of the administration," Mr. Pryor said. "Either way it comes to the same conclusion, and that is that they say they want more resources, but they are very reluctant to accept those resources." Consumer advocates also said they were stunned by the letter. "It was remarkable to send a letter like that to a committee, when you're in dire straits and you need increased funding and you've acknowledged that," said Ellen Bloom, director of federal policy at Consumers Union. The agency has suffered from a steady decline in its budget and staffing in recent years. Its staff numbers about 420, about half its size in the 1980s. It has only one full-time employee to test toys. And 15 inspectors are assigned to police all imports of consumer products under the agency's supervision, a marketplace that last year was valued at $614 billion. Through an agency spokesman, Ms. Nord declined to discuss her opposition to the legislation. Ms. Nord's letter was challenged by the Democrat on the commission, Thomas H. Moore. In a letter last week, Mr. Moore told the lawmakers that he generally supported the legislation for being "strongly pro- consumer." |
#217
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Harbor Freight / WAS: Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now....
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:12:27 -0700, Too_Many_Tools
wrote: On Sep 15, 7:36 pm, Jeff Wisnia wrote: Automotive fuses... Today's mail brought me a Safety Recall notice from Harbor Freight telling me to stop using, remove any in use, and return the 120 piece Mini-Blade Automotive Fuse Assortment I'd tacked onto an order I placed with them a few months ago, because getting 120 fuses for $4.99 seemed like a good deal. (TOO good a deal I guess...) They're paying the postage, will refund $4.99 and gave me a "$5.00 Off coupon" good till next February. The recall notice includes this explanation: "Specifically, manufacturing inconsistencies max exiat with the materials, connections or size of the fuse elements which could result in the fuses failing to protect the circuit from exessive current which could cause damage to a vehicle and possibly a fire." What's next folks? The fuse issue isn't as funny as the "Stove Bolt Assortment" I bought from Harbor Freight several years ago and stuck on the shelf. When I finally wanted to use eight matching fasteners rather than the onsies and twosies I can get from my "hell box" I went to that assortment, only to find that all the 10-24 nuts in it had missed the threading operation and had smooth bore holes in them. Just for ****s and grins I wrote a letter to HF and taped a couple of the unthreaded nuts to it. I described the problem and explained that I assumed the threads were on backorder and asked when they expected to ship them to me. I wasn't sure what that would get me, but figured someone might get a laugh out of it and maybe send me another box of fasteners. Unfortunatly, my letter was answered by some ditzy woman with no sense of humor because I all I got was a letter from her saying my complaint exceeded their allowable time limit for returns and there was nothing they could do about it now. Jeff -- Jeffry Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE) The speed of light is 1.98*10^14 fathoms per fortnight. And you still buy from these crooks?????????? I would not do business with that company if my life depended on it. I liked your letter to them though. Pretty funny !!!! I bet that box of nuts and bolts cost you less than $2, which means it cost them under a buck. This just shows how lousy their business really is. If they are willing to lose a customer (and the friends of that customer) over a buck or two, then their whole business is garbage. I once bought from another similar ripoff company called Homier. I bought a $8 plastic guard. When I got home I opened the box and the whole thing was broken into many pieces. I contacted the company by email, did not get a reply, I phoned and only got an ans. machine and never got a return call. After I finally filed a complaint with a consumer protection agency, they sent me a reply in which they said that they do not warranty their tools against customer abuse, and stated that from the damages I described I had abused the thing...... went on to explain how they carefully inspect everything.... blah blah... also went on that even if the item was defective that it was beyond their warranty date (even though I had contacted them at least 10 times over an 8 month period, before I filed the formal complaint. I responded back telling them that they just lost a customer for life over an $8 item that probably cost them less than $2, and I'd be sure to tell everyone I know to avoid them. All of those places are crooks. They get these discarded foreign junk tools and make a big profit, and dont stand behind their junk. I cant always afford the top of the line tools like SK or others. Years ago I would buy Craftsman, but they are not what they used to be now either. But I refuse to buy that junk stuff from these "disposible" companies. I find that the tools at places like Ace Hardware are decent, and are returnable. Sure they cost more than Harbor Freight, but you get what you pay for. At the same time I have boughten some of the "house brand" power tools from Menards (knowing I can return them), and have not been disappointed. |
#218
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.home.repair,alt.fan.cecil-adams
|
|||
|
|||
Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now....
On Oct 31, 7:12 pm, Too_Many_Tools wrote:
On Sep 15, 7:36 pm, Jeff Wisnia wrote: Automotive fuses... Today's mail brought me a Safety Recall notice from Harbor Freight telling me to stop using, remove any in use, and return the 120 piece Mini-Blade Automotive Fuse Assortment I'd tacked onto an order I placed with them a few months ago, because getting 120 fuses for $4.99 seemed like a good deal. (TOO good a deal I guess...) They're paying the postage, will refund $4.99 and gave me a "$5.00 Off coupon" good till next February. The recall notice includes this explanation: "Specifically, manufacturing inconsistencies max exiat with the materials, connections or size of the fuse elements which could result in the fuses failing to protect the circuit from exessive current which could cause damage to a vehicle and possibly a fire." What's next folks? The fuse issue isn't as funny as the "Stove Bolt Assortment" I bought from Harbor Freight several years ago and stuck on the shelf. When I finally wanted to use eight matching fasteners rather than the onsies and twosies I can get from my "hell box" I went to that assortment, only to find that all the 10-24 nuts in it had missed the threading operation and had smooth bore holes in them. Just for ****s and grins I wrote a letter to HF and taped a couple of the unthreaded nuts to it. I described the problem and explained that I assumed the threads were on backorder and asked when they expected to ship them to me. I wasn't sure what that would get me, but figured someone might get a laugh out of it and maybe send me another box of fasteners. Unfortunatly, my letter was answered by some ditzy woman with no sense of humor because I all I got was a letter from her saying my complaint exceeded their allowable time limit for returns and there was nothing they could do about it now. Jeff -- Jeffry Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE) The speed of light is 1.98*10^14 fathoms per fortnight. Check this out....the time for a new Administration is long overdue. TMT October 30, 2007 Bigger Budget? No, Responds Safety Agency By STEPHEN LABATON WASHINGTON, Oct. 29 - The nation's top official for consumer product safety has asked Congress in recent days to reject legislation intended to strengthen the agency, which polices thousands of consumer goods, from toys to tools. On the eve of an important Senate committee meeting to consider the legislation, Nancy A. Nord, the acting chairwoman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, has asked lawmakers in two letters not to approve the bulk of legislation that would increase the agency's authority, double its budget and sharply increase its dwindling staff. Ms. Nord opposes provisions that would increase the maximum penalties for safety violations and make it easier for the government to make public reports of faulty products, protect industry whistle-blowers and prosecute executives of companies that willfully violate laws. The measure is an effort to buttress an agency that has been under siege because of a raft of tainted and dangerous products manufactured both domestically and abroad. In the last two months alone, more than 13 million toys have been recalled after tests indicated lead levels that sometimes reached almost 200 times the safety limit. Ms. Nord's opposition to important elements of the legislation is consistent with the broadly deregulatory approach of the Bush administration over the last seven years. In a variety of areas, from antitrust to trucking and worker safety, officials appointed by President Bush have sought to reduce the role of regulation and government in the marketplace. Tony Fratto, a White House spokesman, said that Ms. Nord had not coordinated her effort to kill the legislation with the White House. But he said that the administration shared many of her concerns and that Allan Hubbard, President Bush's top economic adviser at the White House, was preparing to send a letter to Congress "that is probably even more forceful than Ms. Nord's." The Senate Commerce Committee is set to vote on Tuesday on the legislation, which is sponsored by Senator Daniel K. Inouye, the Hawaii Democrat who heads the committee, and Senator Mark Pryor, the Arkansas Democrat who heads the consumer affairs subcommittee. It would more than double the agency's budget, to $141 million, over the next seven years, raise staffing levels by about 20 percent, and give the commission broad new powers to police the marketplace. It would raise the cap on the maximum penalties to $100 million, from $1.8 million. Ms. Nord, who before joining the agency had been a lawyer at Eastman Kodak and an official at the United States Chamber of Commerce, criticized the measure in letters sent late last week and on Monday afternoon to the Democratic leaders of the committee. She was critical, for instance, of a provision to ban lead from all toys, saying it was not practical. She said that the proposal to raise the potential penalty to $100 million "may have the undesired consequence of firms, as a precautionary measure, flooding the agency with virtually every consumer complaint and incident." Her concern, she said, was that the increase in complaints would so overwhelm the commission that, "true safety issues would go unrecognized in the process." She also criticized a provision that would give state prosecutors the authority to enforce the federal consumer safety laws. Manufacturers had agreed to another provision that would assign independent laboratories to test and certify the safety of products, rather than the agency. But Ms. Nord said she objected to the provision. She preferred that the agency determine the conditions for using independent laboratories. Some of Ms. Nord's complaints were similar to the ones that business groups and manufacturers have raised, including that the legislation would be unnecessarily burdensome. But in other areas, like whistle- blower protection, her complaints went beyond those of industry. While companies generally have not objected to giving protection to whistle-blowers in the industries regulated by the commission, for example, she said it would "dramatically drain the limited resources of the commission, to the direct detriment of public safety." While Ms. Nord said she supported the committee's efforts in general, she issued a more modest proposal than the one under consideration in the Senate. It would, among other things, increase the maximum amount of civil penalties to $10 million, create incentives for companies to halt sales of recalled products quickly, and give the government the authority to seize assets of a company found to have violated criminal safety laws. Senator Pryor said Ms. Nord's objections surprised him. "It's hard for me to know if it's just ideological or she is just expressing the wishes of the administration," Mr. Pryor said. "Either way it comes to the same conclusion, and that is that they say they want more resources, but they are very reluctant to accept those resources." Consumer advocates also said they were stunned by the letter. "It was remarkable to send a letter like that to a committee, when you're in dire straits and you need increased funding and you've acknowledged that," said Ellen Bloom, director of federal policy at Consumers Union. The agency has suffered from a steady decline in its budget and staffing in recent years. Its staff numbers about 420, about half its size in the 1980s. It has only one full-time employee to test toys. And 15 inspectors are assigned to police all imports of consumer products under the agency's supervision, a marketplace that last year was valued at $614 billion. Through an agency spokesman, Ms. Nord declined to discuss her opposition to the legislation. Ms. Nord's letter was challenged by the Democrat on the commission, Thomas H. Moore. In a letter last week, Mr. Moore told the lawmakers that he generally supported the legislation for being "strongly pro- consumer."- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - FYI... TMT Doctors urged on signs of lead poisoning By MIKE STOBBE, AP Medical Writer Thu Nov 1, 9:05 PM ET Children with blood lead levels lower than the U.S. standard may still suffer lower IQs or other problems, a government advisory panel said Thursday as it urged doctors to be more alert to signs of lead poisoning. The warning, in a report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, comes amid growing parent concerns over imported toys with lead. Lead poisoning can cause irreversible learning disabilities and behavioral problems and, at very high levels, seizures, coma and even death. The CDC has never set a threshold for what defines lead poisoning. But it created a standard of sorts in 1991 when it said a lead level of 10 micrograms per deciliter of blood should prompt a doctor to assess the child's environment and take other protective steps. "You can have toxicity at levels all the way down to zero," said Dr. Morri Markowitz, director of the pediatric environmental sciences clinic at New York City's Montefiore Medical Center. He was not involved in the report. However, the guideline of 10 micrograms has become the number that doctors use when deciding to refer a child for further attention. The same number is used in Canada and Britain. This is the first time the Advisory Committee on Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention has focused on the risks to children with lower levels of lead in their blood, said Dr. Helen Binns of Northwestern University, primary author of the report. The panel isn't proposing a new standard, she said, but is "emphasizing that all levels are important." The report is being published in the November issue of the medical journal Pediatrics. Children with blood lead levels below 10, or even those up to 20, exhibit no obvious symptoms. But scientists believe intellectual development may be affected at lower levels. The new report was driven by recent research that indicated differences in intellectual development of children with measurable levels of lead poisoning as compared to other kids. The paper advises doctors how to talk to parents of children who have lower levels of lead and how to describe the risk, nutrition changes and safeguards to prevent any additional exposure, Binns said. There's no treatment proven effective at reducing these lead levels in children, said Mary Jean Brown, chief of the CDC's lead poisoning prevention branch. "We don't have an intervention that will lower a blood lead level from 8 to 4," she said. The paper also recommends that doctors check the labs they use for testing blood, because some are more exact than others. Approximately 310,000 U.S. children aged 1-5 years have blood lead levels greater than 10 micrograms of lead per deciliter of blood, according to CDC estimates. That's fewer than 2 percent of children in that age bracket. ______ On the Net: The CDC report: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
the lead paint look? | Home Repair | |||
Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now.... | Metalworking | |||
Pet Food, Toothpaste, Lead Paint, and now.... | Metalworking | |||
when did lead paint first come into use? | Home Repair | |||
Lead in paint? | UK diy |