Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Order a complete service manual from L/G-Zenith and repair it to your
satisfaction. It is highly probable the set requires replacement circuit module(s) to function properly. If you indeed paid the service tech to diagnose the set then he should have left with you a report as to what items are needed for comprehensive repair, however if the service was preformed "FREE" then you have what you compensated for. "Sarah" wrote in message ... I have a Zenith rear projection tv. When I turn it on, it shows a recent power outage/reset clock message, that fades to almost complete blackness after about a minute. A repairman spent not more than 5 minutes in it and produced a perfect picture, but then he said to keep the perfect picture would cost $500. I did not think 2 minutes worth of work with no parts was worth $500, so he put the tv back to its non-working condition. Does anyone know what he might have done? Or any course of action I could take? I have a degree in Electronic Engineering and I have experience working with high voltage, so I am capable of fixing it, I am not experienced with TVs much and I was hoping someone could save me a lot of troubleshooting with a scope... I would be greatly indebted to anyone that can help.... Thanks so much -Lance Stubblefield |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Zenith Rear Projection TV/Model PV4655LK9
From: "Arthur Jernberg" .. If you indeed paid the service tech to diagnose the set then he should have left with you a report as to what items are needed for comprehensive repair, however if the service was preformed "FREE" then you have what you compensated for. An "estimate charge" should not cover the actual part failure, the part number, and instructions on how to replace it. Any tech who does so won't be in business long. John Del Wolcott, CT "Nothing is so opportune for tyrants as a people tired of its liberty." Alan Keyes (remove S for email reply) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agreed John. However I've been doing this for over 35 years. I find that
giving the customer the information, not the expertise, is not considered a loss. Having the customer put enough trust in you to actually let you into their residence so you can give them and estimate and diagnose the fault tends to expect recripical benefits. IMHO A/J "John Del" wrote in message ... Subject: Zenith Rear Projection TV/Model PV4655LK9 From: "Arthur Jernberg" . If you indeed paid the service tech to diagnose the set then he should have left with you a report as to what items are needed for comprehensive repair, however if the service was preformed "FREE" then you have what you compensated for. An "estimate charge" should not cover the actual part failure, the part number, and instructions on how to replace it. Any tech who does so won't be in business long. John Del Wolcott, CT "Nothing is so opportune for tyrants as a people tired of its liberty." Alan Keyes (remove S for email reply) |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I disagree. I give the customer the parts and location numbers from my
evaluation of their unit and have been in this business for over 20 years and doing well. It is rare that someone will take an estimate and fix the unit themselves or take it to another shop. If it happens occassionally, I'll take that chance in exchange for the trust that my customers have in me and the way they view me as a professional compared to the competition. Leonard Caillouet "John Del" wrote in message ... Subject: Zenith Rear Projection TV/Model PV4655LK9 From: "Arthur Jernberg" . If you indeed paid the service tech to diagnose the set then he should have left with you a report as to what items are needed for comprehensive repair, however if the service was preformed "FREE" then you have what you compensated for. An "estimate charge" should not cover the actual part failure, the part number, and instructions on how to replace it. Any tech who does so won't be in business long. John Del Wolcott, CT "Nothing is so opportune for tyrants as a people tired of its liberty." Alan Keyes (remove S for email reply) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Zenith Rear Projection TV/Model PV4655LK9
From: "Arthur Jernberg" Date: 7/23/03 8:21 PM Eastern Daylight Time Message-id: Agreed John. However I've been doing this for over 35 years. I find that giving the customer the information, not the expertise, is not considered a loss. Exactly. But some customers don't want to just know that there is a problem in the vert deflection (for example) and how much, they want to know what exact part(s) is needed. I've had some customers carry in an item, and ask if I would identify the defective component so that they can replace it themselves. John Del Wolcott, CT "Nothing is so opportune for tyrants as a people tired of its liberty." Alan Keyes (remove S for email reply) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Floyd" wrote in message ... Everyone seems to be missing the point that in the original post, it was stated the repair tech restored "a perfect picture" within 5 minutes. Then, when the customer thought $500.00 was too much, the tech returned the set to it previous state. I don't know about the rest of you guys, but it seems to me if the tech could restore the picture to "perfect" or "failed" at will, then maybe something fishy is going on with the tech's prices. I don't recall the original post saying anything about breaking the cost down into separate labour and parts prices, but I can only presume the part must be the majority of the cost. $500.00 is a little steep for a 5 minute or 1 hour service call. Furthermore, I'd be questioning why a presumably very expensive part is required if the tech could restore the picture and then return the set to its failed condition at will without a part. What's up with that? I'll freely admit that it's been a while since I've repaired televisions, but I can't imagine what might be going on here. Regards, Michael Floyd On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 20:21:44 -0400, "Arthur Jernberg" wrote: I haven't been in on this conversation, but I absolutely agree. What did that tech do to make the set work fine without replacing anything? And whatever it was is going to cost 500 dollars? While it's true we don't know what it is he did, if I was the customer, it would send up a red flag to me. I always tell my customers exactly what the problem is, to help win and keep their trust. This person needs to find a shop that will tell here exactly what the problem is. Agreed John. However I've been doing this for over 35 years. I find that giving the customer the information, not the expertise, is not considered a loss. Having the customer put enough trust in you to actually let you int o their residence so you can give them and estimate and diagnose the fault tends to expect recripical benefits. IMHO A/J "John Del" wrote in message ... Subject: Zenith Rear Projection TV/Model PV4655LK9 From: "Arthur Jernberg" . If you indeed paid the service tech to diagnose the set then he should have left with you a report as to what items are needed for comprehensive repair, however if the service was preformed "FREE" then you have what you compensated for. An "estimate charge" should not cover the actual part failure, the part number, and instructions on how to replace it. Any tech who does so won't be in business long. John Del Wolcott, CT "Nothing is so opportune for tyrants as a people tired of its liberty." Alan Keyes (remove S for email reply) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
RCA Rear Projection Screen TV | Electronics | |||
Zenith TV problems | Electronics Repair | |||
RCA Rear Projection TV Problem - Model Number P52955 | Electronics Repair |