Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Small LCD TV Recommendation
I am looking for a small LCD TV (12v/120v) to have available for
emergencies. Are there any that the group would recommend? Thanks for any suggestions. TMT |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Too_Many_Tools" wrote in message oups.com... I am looking for a small LCD TV (12v/120v) to have available for emergencies. Are there any that the group would recommend? Thanks for any suggestions. TMT Most of them are pretty similar internally, just shop around and find one that doesn't feel too cheeply made, if it's only for emergencies it should be fine, just keep the batteries separately rather than leaving them in the battery compartment if not used for long periods. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the response.
I always keep batteries separate...it is the only way to be sure that you will not have damage from leakage. Does anyone have any reviews for sensitivity, power consumption, operating temperature range....again I am looking for something that can be used in an emergency sense that would be easy on the batteries and be rugged from an enviromental sense. Thanks TMT |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Too_Many_Tools wrote: Thanks for the response. I always keep batteries separate...it is the only way to be sure that you will not have damage from leakage. Does anyone have any reviews for sensitivity, power consumption, operating temperature range....again I am looking for something that can be used in an emergency sense that would be easy on the batteries and be rugged from an enviromental sense. Thanks TMT Hi Too... Just a couple of thoughts, if I may? Assuming that you're preparing for the kinds of emergencies that the USA has had a few of recently, if it were me I'd be tempted to stay away from LCD's. Think I'd like to get ahold of one of those little 5 inch sets of the type that walmart sells for about 19 dollars (canadian). Emergency's don't need large screens (power consuming), not colour (power consuming), nor any of the other niceties. Information is all, isn't it? And - those little sets also have built in am/fm radios. Far less power conumption (assuming hydro is gone) and far far more to choose from. Thinking that the other new "necessities" like cable and satellite may be gone, you'd have at best perhaps half a dozen tv stations in a large city; whereas there might be dozens of am and fm stations within earshot. Surely more radio would survive. And information is all you need. And when and if power does become precious, you can even plug in a little crystal earplug, reducing battery demand to almost nothing. Finally, I'd get me two or three sets of the best alkalines I could find; the freshest dated I could find. Leave them in the original package still sealed so there's no chance that the kids will have borrowed them for their infernal cd players and put 'em back half dead. Replace them all once every year or two with new ones, give the older ones to the teens Just an old guy in Canada thinking out loud. Ken |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Good points.
I have small color LCD sets and they do come in handy but their screens are rather small. I have been in the middle of tornado activity and severe thunderstorms. The color screen is needed to determine where the strongest storms are via the weather radar displays shown on television. The small B/W sets have small CRTs that I suspect use more current than the small LCD screens...that is why I was wondering if anyone had compared the different sets. A small color CRT set would have three guns that would likely use even more current. In an extended emergency situation, lower current draw is important. The combination of a televison and radio is a good idea. At the same time, sometimes you want separate televisions and radios so you have redundanies of your communications gear. TMT |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Ken Weitzel" wrote in message news:PCKZe.551683$5V4.227121@pd7tw3no... Too_Many_Tools wrote: Thanks for the response. I always keep batteries separate...it is the only way to be sure that you will not have damage from leakage. Does anyone have any reviews for sensitivity, power consumption, operating temperature range....again I am looking for something that can be used in an emergency sense that would be easy on the batteries and be rugged from an enviromental sense. Thanks TMT Hi Too... Just a couple of thoughts, if I may? Assuming that you're preparing for the kinds of emergencies that the USA has had a few of recently, if it were me I'd be tempted to stay away from LCD's. Think I'd like to get ahold of one of those little 5 inch sets of the type that walmart sells for about 19 dollars (canadian). Emergency's don't need large screens (power consuming), not colour (power consuming), nor any of the other niceties. Information is all, isn't it? I'd be shocked if a color LCD uses even half the power of a B&W CRT, not to mention for 19 bucks can you even count on the thing working in an emergency? Personally I'd just get a radio, but for a little TV, LCD is the way to go. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I would agree but have yet to see any real comparsions thus the subject
of the thread. I too consider radio to be a basic need but after going through several weather related emergencies of tornadoes, floods and forest fires I can tell you that you need to be able to see what the local television stations are broadcasting LIVE. The television also needs to display in color since a number of real time maps and displays offered use color to encode necessary data. The handheld color LCD units work surprisely well but the screens can be too small to make out some details...so the search goes on for a somewhat larger but portable set. TMT |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Ken Weitzel wrote:
Hi Too... Just a couple of thoughts, if I may? Assuming that you're preparing for the kinds of emergencies that the USA has had a few of recently, if it were me I'd be tempted to stay away from LCD's. Think I'd like to get ahold of one of those little 5 inch sets of the type that walmart sells for about 19 dollars (canadian). Emergency's don't need large screens (power consuming), not colour (power consuming), nor any of the other niceties. Information is all, isn't it? And - those little sets also have built in am/fm radios. Far less power conumption (assuming hydro is gone) and far far more to choose from. Thinking that the other new "necessities" like cable and satellite may be gone, you'd have at best perhaps half a dozen tv stations in a large city; whereas there might be dozens of am and fm stations within earshot. Surely more radio would survive. And information is all you need. And when and if power does become precious, you can even plug in a little crystal earplug, reducing battery demand to almost nothing. Finally, I'd get me two or three sets of the best alkalines I could find; the freshest dated I could find. Leave them in the original package still sealed so there's no chance that the kids will have borrowed them for their infernal cd players and put 'em back half dead. Replace them all once every year or two with new ones, give the older ones to the teens Just an old guy in Canada thinking out loud. Ken When Ocala was hit last year there was only one weak TV signal available, and no local radio stations, at first. the land lines were out, and what was left of the cell system was overloaded by non emergency traffic. Most of the cell sites have backup generators and several days worth of fuel, so some sites were available long then others. Some sites are near priority electrical users, so they had power before others, but CATV and land line services were spotty for weeks. Brighthouse sent trucks out with generators to recharge the backup batteries to restore CATV service where they could, but when you have hundreds of dead UPS systems in the area it just isn't possible to do them all at once. If you are planning for this kind of emergency a shortwave radio will help a lot more, especially at night. Also, with the grid down for several miles, the usual blanket of electrical noise was gone so i could hear stations in other cities on AM, when they had power. Its more important to keep at least a weeks worth of food and water, flashlights and several weeks supply of ALL the different medicines anyone in your family needs. I was without electricity for two hurricanes last year, for a total of about a month. I had to use buckets of rain water to flush the toilet, and to take a quick sponge bath. I was lucky. I had prepared, with extra food and water. I had 2 liter bottles of ware in the freezer so i could have some cold water to drink for about three days. After that, it was warm bottled water to was down the food. SPAM, peanut butter and crackers, and some cans of soup or vegetables. I heated them by putting the can on the dash of my truck with all the windows up for a few hours. It wasn't as hot as I liked it, but it was better than eating it cold. I missed the fresh fruit and vegetables but I had enough food to keep me from going hungry. -- ? Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I would argue that a radio that receives AM stations from a moderate
distance is likely the best device for hearing broadcasts that would interest one in a disaster area. After you get a certain distance from the event, stations do not carry revelant information for the situation. If you are in your home, a satellite dish would make sense for a news feed. Both assume that you have power to spare. As I have mentioned before, I have been in several situations where it was important to see what the live feed was from the local television station so I have seen the usefulness of a small portable tv. TMT |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Too_Many_Tools wrote:
I would argue that a radio that receives AM stations from a moderate distance is likely the best device for hearing broadcasts that would interest one in a disaster area. After you get a certain distance from the event, stations do not carry revelant information for the situation. If you are in your home, a satellite dish would make sense for a news feed. Both assume that you have power to spare. As I have mentioned before, I have been in several situations where it was important to see what the live feed was from the local television station so I have seen the usefulness of a small portable tv. TMT Like I said, there were no local stations on the air at first, and there was no electricity for almost a month, total. I did get some information from stations outside the immediate area, because they were in contact with the local EOC office and were helping get the information out. A neighbor had a 12 V tv and ran his sat rec off an inverter, but the only local TV station was off the air and couldn't uplink any news to a bird so all he got was national news from TV. The shortwave radio helped me to track the eyes of the hurricanes, and later, to here international news after I was allowed to go home from the hurricane shelter. Its better to have more resources than you need, than not enough. I have a three week supply of fresh AA. C and D cells, two battery radios, four good flashlights and almost three weeks worth of food for emergencies. A couple times in my life I have found myself stuck at home, and I learned to keep plenty of things for emergencies. I rotate the supplies by buying fresh stuff and using the oldest so I don't end up with a bunch of out of date food and drinking water or batteries. -- ? Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Too_Many_Tools wrote:
I would argue that a radio that receives AM stations from a moderate distance is likely the best device for hearing broadcasts that would interest one in a disaster area. After you get a certain distance from the event, stations do not carry revelant information for the situation. If you are in your home, a satellite dish would make sense for a news feed. Both assume that you have power to spare. As I have mentioned before, I have been in several situations where it was important to see what the live feed was from the local television station so I have seen the usefulness of a small portable tv. TMT I have several com devices which are handy in a weather emergency. The LCD TV is very good to catch incoming weather radar images. A pair of FRS radios with NOAA weather radio are also a plus. Add to that, a good AM/FM portable, cell phone. Shortwave, I don't see as that useful, as one is more concerned with local information, not Radio Havana. The new programmable weather radios which operate off battery or AC are great. You can set the alarm to only sound for *very* local emergencies...a big improvement over the older, cheaper models which sound off for any warning within the entire region. jak |
#12
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Small LCD TV Recommendation
On 25 Sep 2005 14:04:44 -0700, "Too_Many_Tools"
wrote: I am looking for a small LCD TV (12v/120v) to have available for emergencies. Are there any that the group would recommend? Thanks for any suggestions. TMT What is Canada doing about digital? Is it going to make this tv obsolete soon? If a digital to analog converter will be available, will it run on batteries? Remove NOPSAM to email me. Please let me know if you have posted also. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HELP: Garage Heater Recommendation | Home Ownership | |||
Rotary Saw Recommendation? | Woodworking | |||
Recommendations for small hobby lathe | Metalworking | |||
Bowl Saving: A Comprehensive Discussion | Woodturning |