On 6/23/2017 10:38 AM, Jack wrote:
On 6/22/2017 4:13 PM, Leon wrote:

Thanks Leon, I'll have to get some of that.

Speaking of Amazon, looking for the product, at Lowe's it was $9.99 and
at Amazon, $13.14, plus shipping, over 30% more, plus shipping. Damn,
Amazon is really out to lunch on so much stuff.


You did not check completely. You can find it in the right column for
$10.99 free shipping from Sim supply.

https://smile.amazon.com/As11-Fluid-...uid+film+spray

The $13.14 price is free shipping if you have Prime and want it in two
days.

Amazon is not always the lowest price but you also have to factor in the
time and cost of a trip to Lowes. For me, it is about $7 if I go alone,
about $37 if my wife goes and we stop for lunch.

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 22:24:09 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:43:08 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:39:40 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote:

On 6/22/2017 11:31 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet writes:
On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
This is why the terrorists hate us.

http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes




A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.

Where, in the article above, does it mention liberals?

I confess, it does not mention them, it describes them, you have to read
between the lines. ;~) The article did not mention ignorant uneducated
either but I think we both agree on that.





And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
option now, right London?

Personally, I'd rather face a fruitcake with a knife than one
with an AR-15. Apples != Oranges.


Absolutely but gun control does not stop violence, alternative weapons
will be used and more so now as shown in the news in gun controlled areas.

And automobiles being used to cause mass casualties.
The gun is still the most efficient killer of the "common" weapons,
particularly for a "targetted" attack. Other than "terrorist"
and"looney" killers, it is generally the "lethal weapon of choice"
around the world.
Yes, eye-drops can be used too, or Insulin, - - -

Most popular perhaps, but gasoline is far more _efficient.
Not if you are trying to pick someone off a good distance away
without being detected.

How is that efficient? How long does it take you to kill 87 people that
way? To what extent do you have to expose yourself to capture to do it?
Sitting in the cab of a truck at the scene exposes yourself to
capture a whole lot more than sniping from a Km away - - (or in the
case of the Canadian Special Forces guy, 3.5KM)

On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:38:48 -0400, Jack wrote:

ilm a few months ago.
I picked up a can at Lowe's a few months ago and I like the stuff,
except for the fresh sprayed sme
That's why I only buy on-line what I can't buy locally. Can almost
always beat the Amazing Amazon prices next door.

On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 11:57:17 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:

On 6/23/2017 10:38 AM, Jack wrote:
On 6/22/2017 4:13 PM, Leon wrote:

Thanks Leon, I'll have to get some of that.

Speaking of Amazon, looking for the product, at Lowe's it was $9.99 and
at Amazon, $13.14, plus shipping, over 30% more, plus shipping. Damn,
Amazon is really out to lunch on so much stuff.


You did not check completely. You can find it in the right column for
$10.99 free shipping from Sim supply.

https://smile.amazon.com/As11-Fluid-...uid+film+spray

The $13.14 price is free shipping if you have Prime and want it in two
days.

Amazon is not always the lowest price but you also have to factor in the
time and cost of a trip to Lowes. For me, it is about $7 if I go alone,
about $37 if my wife goes and we stop for lunch.


I jump on my bike if I want toi be sure I don't bring too many extras
along home with me - - -

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 22:24:09 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:43:08 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:39:40 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote:

On 6/22/2017 11:31 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet writes:
On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
This is why the terrorists hate us.

http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes




A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.

Where, in the article above, does it mention liberals?

I confess, it does not mention them, it describes them, you have to read
between the lines. ;~) The article did not mention ignorant uneducated
either but I think we both agree on that.





And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
option now, right London?

Personally, I'd rather face a fruitcake with a knife than one
with an AR-15. Apples != Oranges.


Absolutely but gun control does not stop violence, alternative weapons
will be used and more so now as shown in the news in gun controlled areas.

And automobiles being used to cause mass casualties.
The gun is still the most efficient killer of the "common" weapons,
particularly for a "targetted" attack. Other than "terrorist"
and"looney" killers, it is generally the "lethal weapon of choice"
around the world.
Yes, eye-drops can be used too, or Insulin, - - -

Most popular perhaps, but gasoline is far more _efficient.
Not if you are trying to pick someone off a good distance away
without being detected.

How is that efficient? How long does it take you to kill 87 people that
way? To what extent do you have to expose yourself to capture to do it?
Sitting in the cab of a truck at the scene exposes yourself to
capture a whole lot more than sniping from a Km away - - (or in the
case of the Canadian Special Forces guy, 3.5KM)

Why would one be sitting in the cab of a truck? And wandering around a
city with a sniper rifle gets noticed.

On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 22:10:01 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 22:24:09 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:43:08 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:39:40 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote:

On 6/22/2017 11:31 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet writes:
On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
This is why the terrorists hate us.

http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes




A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.

Where, in the article above, does it mention liberals?

I confess, it does not mention them, it describes them, you have to read
between the lines. ;~) The article did not mention ignorant uneducated
either but I think we both agree on that.





And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
option now, right London?

Personally, I'd rather face a fruitcake with a knife than one
with an AR-15. Apples != Oranges.


Absolutely but gun control does not stop violence, alternative weapons
will be used and more so now as shown in the news in gun controlled areas.

And automobiles being used to cause mass casualties.
The gun is still the most efficient killer of the "common" weapons,
particularly for a "targetted" attack. Other than "terrorist"
and"looney" killers, it is generally the "lethal weapon of choice"
around the world.
Yes, eye-drops can be used too, or Insulin, - - -

Most popular perhaps, but gasoline is far more _efficient.
Not if you are trying to pick someone off a good distance away
without being detected.

How is that efficient? How long does it take you to kill 87 people that
way? To what extent do you have to expose yourself to capture to do it?
Sitting in the cab of a truck at the scene exposes yourself to
capture a whole lot more than sniping from a Km away - - (or in the
case of the Canadian Special Forces guy, 3.5KM)

Why would one be sitting in the cab of a truck? And wandering around a
city with a sniper rifle gets noticed.

Took a few weeks to notice these guys.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D.C._sniper_attacks

On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 22:10:01 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 22:24:09 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:43:08 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:39:40 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote:

On 6/22/2017 11:31 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet writes:
On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
This is why the terrorists hate us.

http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes




A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.

Where, in the article above, does it mention liberals?

I confess, it does not mention them, it describes them, you have to read
between the lines. ;~) The article did not mention ignorant uneducated
either but I think we both agree on that.





And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
option now, right London?

Personally, I'd rather face a fruitcake with a knife than one
with an AR-15. Apples != Oranges.


Absolutely but gun control does not stop violence, alternative weapons
will be used and more so now as shown in the news in gun controlled areas.

And automobiles being used to cause mass casualties.
The gun is still the most efficient killer of the "common" weapons,
particularly for a "targetted" attack. Other than "terrorist"
and"looney" killers, it is generally the "lethal weapon of choice"
around the world.
Yes, eye-drops can be used too, or Insulin, - - -

Most popular perhaps, but gasoline is far more _efficient.
Not if you are trying to pick someone off a good distance away
without being detected.

How is that efficient? How long does it take you to kill 87 people that
way? To what extent do you have to expose yourself to capture to do it?
Sitting in the cab of a truck at the scene exposes yourself to
capture a whole lot more than sniping from a Km away - - (or in the
case of the Canadian Special Forces guy, 3.5KM)

Why would one be sitting in the cab of a truck? And wandering around a
city with a sniper rifle gets noticed.

The truck is the weapon of choice right now for terrorists in europe -
also used a large "car bombs" Sniper rifles break down and can be
easily camoflauged - guitar case, etc - can be quickly set up on a
roof or in an open window, virtually out of sight. Ready to pick off
as many random or targetted targets as one wants.

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 22:10:01 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 22:24:09 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:43:08 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:39:40 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote:

On 6/22/2017 11:31 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet writes:
On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
This is why the terrorists hate us.

http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes




A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some one
else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.

Where, in the article above, does it mention liberals?

I confess, it does not mention them, it describes them, you have to read
between the lines. ;~) The article did not mention ignorant uneducated
either but I think we both agree on that.





And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
option now, right London?

Personally, I'd rather face a fruitcake with a knife than one
with an AR-15. Apples != Oranges.


Absolutely but gun control does not stop violence, alternative weapons
will be used and more so now as shown in the news in gun controlled areas.

And automobiles being used to cause mass casualties.
The gun is still the most efficient killer of the "common" weapons,
particularly for a "targetted" attack. Other than "terrorist"
and"looney" killers, it is generally the "lethal weapon of choice"
around the world.
Yes, eye-drops can be used too, or Insulin, - - -

Most popular perhaps, but gasoline is far more _efficient.
Not if you are trying to pick someone off a good distance away
without being detected.

How is that efficient? How long does it take you to kill 87 people that
way? To what extent do you have to expose yourself to capture to do it?
Sitting in the cab of a truck at the scene exposes yourself to
capture a whole lot more than sniping from a Km away - - (or in the
case of the Canadian Special Forces guy, 3.5KM)

Why would one be sitting in the cab of a truck? And wandering around a
city with a sniper rifle gets noticed.

The truck is the weapon of choice right now for terrorists in europe -
also used a large "car bombs"

That's nice but it has nothing to do with anything I said so it is in no
sense a refutation.

Sniper rifles break down and can be
easily camoflauged - guitar case, etc - can be quickly set up on a
roof or in an open window, virtually out of sight.

You need to quit getting your information about firearms from James Bond
movies.

Ready to pick off
as many random or targetted targets as one wants.

You mean make as much noise as one wants before the SWAT team arrives.

On 6/23/2017 11:57 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 6/23/2017 10:38 AM, Jack wrote:
On 6/22/2017 4:13 PM, Leon wrote:

Thanks Leon, I'll have to get some of that.

Speaking of Amazon, looking for the product, at Lowe's it was $9.99
and at Amazon, $13.14, plus shipping, over 30% more, plus shipping.
Damn, Amazon is really out to lunch on so much stuff.


You did not check completely. You can find it in the right column for
$10.99 free shipping from Sim supply.

https://smile.amazon.com/As11-Fluid-...uid+film+spray


The $13.14 price is free shipping if you have Prime and want it in two
days.

Amazon is not always the lowest price but you also have to factor in the
time and cost of a trip to Lowes. For me, it is about $7 if I go alone,
about $37 if my wife goes and we stop for lunch.

She lets you off cheap.

Anyway, my price was without shipping, but shipping was free if you
spent 25 bucks or more, so bring your wife and it was just 30% more,
unless you are sitting at the console with the wife...

Also, I usually put stuff I want (not need) on my cell phone list app
and when I go shopping for something I need, I check my app for stuff
like this, so the trip is happening anyway.
--
Jack
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.
http://jbstein.com

On 6/22/2017 8:19 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:27:13 -0500, Markem
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:48:04 -0600, Just Wondering
wrote:

On 6/22/2017 10:27 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
On 6/22/17 11:19 AM, Leon wrote:
On 6/22/2017 10:40 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
This is why the terrorists hate us.

http://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/home-depot-menards-under-fire-over-lumber-sizes




A wonderful example of the ignorant uneducated liberals wanting some
one else to take the blame for their lack of knowledge.

And for you gun control fanatics, knives and bombs are the popular
option now, right London?

This article about it is great!
http://abovethelaw.com/2017/06/lawsuit-home-depot-selling-4x4s-that-arent-4-inches-by-4-inches-everyone-else-they-arent-supposed-to-be-you-moron/

Next they'll be suing Harbor Freight for selling 8'x10' tarps that are
really more like 7'6"x9'6". Or suing Payless for selling size 8 shoes
that are not all the same size.

Hey it worked for computer monitors, 14 inches they were not.
Now thet are "14 inch class" or "22 inch class" With TVs years back,
the same TV sold as a 27 inch in USA was a 26 inch in Canada.


I recall seeing ab advertized 17" monitor that was actually 15.75" More
than a size smaller.

On 6/23/2017 7:36 AM, Dr. Deb wrote:

Leon, just remember, if liberal are not intelligent enough to understand lumber sizing, they are hopeless when it comes to corrective criticism. After all, THEY are the cultural elite - right ? ;-)


That is the way I see it. ;~)