Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
on 10/12/2007 8:35 PM Nova said the following:
Swingman wrote: "Lew Hodgett" wrote in message Simple. If you use a debit card is used, payment is instantenous. If something goes wrong, you are on your own. You're a bit behind times, Lew ... there are Federal laws now in effect protecting the consumer for debit transactions. Consumer Reports.org September, 2007 article states: "Under federal law, your liability for fraudulent charges on a debit card can be greater than it is for a credit card. With a credit card, you're only responsible for up to $50 in unauthorized purchases. But with a debit card, you can lose up to $500 if you don't report the theft or loss of your card or PIN within two business days of discovering the problem. And if you fail to report the unauthorized charges within 60 days of the date of the statement that lists them, you could be held liable for any unauthorized withdrawals after that date. Those include the full value of credit lines and funds in savings linked to your checking account for overdraft protection." http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/m...f-debit-ov.htm My bank policy is a little different "We will reimburse you for funds transferred from your accounts up to the amount of your loss when you notify the bank within 60 days of the transaction first appearing on your statement." They also send me an email whenever a Debit card or check purchase exceeds an amount that I have set in my account on their website (Minimum $100). -- Bill In Hamptonburgh, NY To email, remove the double zeroes after @ |
#122
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
"Mike Marlow" wrote in message I question this oft quoted yet misapplied analogy. If you grab a 10mm socket and it's too small what do you do? You try to figure out if it's one size, two sizes or whatever, too small. You don't really care about 11 or 12 or 22 for that matter. Same with fractional measurements. Not saying the reasoning is good or bad, but put the following in sequence by size: 13, 11, 12 29/64, 7/16, 9/32 Most experienced mechanics know by looking at a bolt head what to reach for right off, but to the Saturday mechanic, it can be confusing. |
#123
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
"Mike Marlow" wrote in message I question this oft quoted yet misapplied analogy. If you grab a 10mm socket and it's too small what do you do? You try to figure out if it's one size, two sizes or whatever, too small. You don't really care about 11 or 12 or 22 for that matter. Same with fractional measurements. Not saying the reasoning is good or bad, but put the following in sequence by size: 13, 11, 12 29/64, 7/16, 9/32 Most experienced mechanics know by looking at a bolt head what to reach for right off, but to the Saturday mechanic, it can be confusing. I recognize every inch bolt/nut from 1/4" to 1"+ by sight but I'll be damned if I can _yet_ tell the difference between adjacent 1-mm sizes in the 10-12 range. And the designers just seem hellbent to use every daggone one of them in random profusion---it's my biggest complaint about metric in general use although everything, even the Deere now is almost universally metric... -- |
#124
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
"HeyBub" wrote in message Hmm. Saw a report today that China is creeping up on $1 trillion in exports. Much of that to the US and all in Imperial measure. Point is, if countries want to export to the US, it better not be metric. Reality check: Do Japanese autos imported to the US have speedometers in KPH? I have to wonder if China is making what we want to specification easier than other countries because many of their workers have no real experience with either one in an industrial work, thus adapting readily? Seems that many of the opponents are more opposed to having to adapt and learn something new rather that solid reasons why one is better than the other. Can that Japanese car be made cheaper if they stocked only one model of instrument? My Buick is changed on all gauges at the push of a button. Handy when I go to Canada. |
#126
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
"Nova" wrote
Consumer Reports.org September, 2007 article states: More "if's" in that article than Carter had pills ... All their points are moot if you only transfer from an interest bearing account, as needed, what you are willing to lose in the rare instance "**** happens", into an account accessible with a check/debit card. You gotta pity the poor *******s who can't figure out how to make an out and out convenience work for them, free of charge ... then again, many folks today can't be trusted to use a butter knife responsibly. -- www.e-woodshop.net Last update: 9/30/07 KarlC@ (the obvious) |
#127
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
Peter Huebner wrote:
In article , says... And the designers just seem hellbent to use every daggone one of them in random profusion---it's my biggest complaint about metric in general use although everything, even the Deere now is almost universally metric... Not really, at least not if you go to Europe. ... I only work on what is here... -- |
#128
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
"Lew Hodgett" wrote in message ... "Swingman" wrote: ... and just how do you figure that, old man? Simple. If you use a credit card and something goes wrong, you dispute it and retain the use of your money while the dispute. If your credit card gets stolen and unauthorized charges are made, it is the credit card companies responsibility to clean it up. If you use a debit card is used, payment is instantenous. If something goes wrong, you are on your own. If the debit card is stolen and they drain your account, it's your problem. As I said, just another way for the credit card company to screw you. Lew Don't let the facts get in the way of a good story. Most of your statement is completely wrong. |
#129
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
In article , "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote:
Not saying the reasoning is good or bad, but put the following in sequence by size: 13, 11, 12 29/64, 7/16, 9/32 Most experienced mechanics know by looking at a bolt head what to reach for right off, but to the Saturday mechanic, it can be confusing. With the right mindset, it doesn't have to be. Suboptimal mindset: "Hmmm, bolt head looks like about a 9/16..." [look through rack for 9/16 socket] "Nope, too big, guess I'd better go to 1/2..." More effective mindset: "This socket looks about the right size for this bolt... nope, too big, better go one size smaller." IOW, never mind the *numbers* on the side of the socket. Just use what fits. -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com) It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again. |
#130
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
"Doug Miller" wrote in message More effective mindset: "This socket looks about the right size for this bolt... nope, too big, better go one size smaller." IOW, never mind the *numbers* on the side of the socket. Just use what fits. Using your logic, you only need two wrenches in the toolbox, an Imperial adjustable and a metric adjustable. Works for me |
#131
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
On Oct 13, 5:25 pm, "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote:
"Doug Miller" wrote in message More effective mindset: "This socket looks about the right size for this bolt... nope, too big, better go one size smaller." IOW, never mind the *numbers* on the side of the socket. Just use what fits. Using your logic, you only need two wrenches in the toolbox, an Imperial adjustable and a metric adjustable. Works for me ****... you beat me to it. |
#132
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
In article , "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote:
"Doug Miller" wrote in message More effective mindset: "This socket looks about the right size for this bolt... nope, too big, better go one size smaller." IOW, never mind the *numbers* on the side of the socket. Just use what fits. Using your logic, you only need two wrenches in the toolbox, an Imperial adjustable and a metric adjustable. Works for me Did I *really* need to specify "repeat as needed until the proper size is found"?? I thought that went without saying, but apparently I was mistaken. The point is, use the socket that's the right size, and never mind what numbers are etched on the side of it. -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com) It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again. |
#133
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
In article . com, Robatoy wrote:
On Oct 13, 5:25 pm, "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote: "Doug Miller" wrote in message More effective mindset: "This socket looks about the right size for this bolt... nope, too big, better go one size smaller." IOW, never mind the *numbers* on the side of the socket. Just use what fits. Using your logic, you only need two wrenches in the toolbox, an Imperial adjustable and a metric adjustable. Works for me ****... you beat me to it. Shifted nyms, I see. plonk again. -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com) It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again. |
#134
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
"Doug Miller" wrote The point is, use the socket that's the right size, and never mind what numbers are etched on the side of it. That is a given. Since the eyes are not what they used to be, it is damn near impossible to read the socket size etched in the side. |
#135
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
"Doug Miller" wrote in message Did I *really* need to specify "repeat as needed until the proper size is found"?? I thought that went without saying, but apparently I was mistaken. It was a JOKE. Yes, we understood and yes, you are correct. |
#136
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
"Edwin Pawlowski" wrote Using your logic, you only need two wrenches in the toolbox, an Imperial adjustable and a metric adjustable. Works for me My approach is to have many wrenches. This includes both fixed size and adjustable. As well as metric, imperial, etc. |
#137
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
"Lee Michaels" wrote in message ... "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote Using your logic, you only need two wrenches in the toolbox, an Imperial adjustable and a metric adjustable. Works for me My approach is to have many wrenches. This includes both fixed size and adjustable. As well as metric, imperial, etc. Is it too subtle? Metric ADJUSTABLE Imperial ADJUSTABLE No wonder you guys are so reluctant to change. |
#138
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric Nova
On Oct 11, 7:47 pm, "Lee" wrote:
Your missing my point. I am talking about using metric in the current time for measuring...not replacing what we have now when it comes to tools "Nova" wrote in I will as soon as I can buy a 11.90625 millimeter and 5.159375 millimeter socket (respectively). I don't understand your point. How are you going to work in metric without replacing measuring tools, at the very least? You also can't work in metric when you're drilling inch measured holes, cutting inch measured dadoes, and so on. Those two things alone mean tool replacement, because every dado set I've ever seen is calibrated in fractions of an inch. Drilling a 3/4" hole in a 30 cm x 40 cm board works fine, until...how close is the nearest edge to the edge of the hole and how close does it need to be? I got hold of the Craftsman version of the currently touted Triton/Grizzly planer/moulder a couple of years ago, and almost went nuts trying to work to metric measurements for the base board, while using standard plywood. I don't have metric measuring tools; rather, I don't have them where they are accessible for instant (or within the week) use. I expect to die the same way. It just gets overly complicated to swing both ways (unless you're a politician). And just think what it would do to male porn stars...no, wait, they'd probably love it. |
#139
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
In article , "Lee Michaels" wrote:
"Doug Miller" wrote The point is, use the socket that's the right size, and never mind what numbers are etched on the side of it. That is a given. Since the eyes are not what they used to be, it is damn near impossible to read the socket size etched in the side. LOL -- I know exactly what you mean! -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com) It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again. |
#140
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
In article , "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote:
"Doug Miller" wrote in message Did I *really* need to specify "repeat as needed until the proper size is found"?? I thought that went without saying, but apparently I was mistaken. It was a JOKE. Yes, we understood and yes, you are correct. Ok, sorry, Ed, my sense of humor has been malfunctioning all week. -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com) It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again. |
#141
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
On Oct 13, 5:44 pm, (Doug Miller) wrote:
In article . com, Robatoy wrote:On Oct 13, 5:25 pm, "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote: "Doug Miller" wrote in message More effective mindset: "This socket looks about the right size for this bolt... nope, too big, better go one size smaller." IOW, never mind the *numbers* on the side of the socket. Just use what fits. Using your logic, you only need two wrenches in the toolbox, an Imperial adjustable and a metric adjustable. Works for me ****... you beat me to it. Shifted nyms, I see. plonk again. I wasn't talking to you, asshole! |
#142
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
On Oct 13, 7:26 pm, (Doug Miller) wrote:
In article , "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote: "Doug Miller" wrote in message Did I *really* need to specify "repeat as needed until the proper size is found"?? I thought that went without saying, but apparently I was mistaken. It was a JOKE. Yes, we understood and yes, you are correct. Ok, sorry, Ed, my sense of humor has been malfunctioning all week. You don't HAVE a sense of humour! ------see? NOW I am talking to you. Get it straight, you sad sack, you! |
#143
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
"HeyBub" wrote in
: *snip* Reality check: Do Japanese autos imported to the US have speedometers in KPH? My Japanese-made Prius switches when you press the button. The good stuff from Japan (Nintendo and Toyota are my primary reference points) do an excellent job of making the fact they use different measurements transparent. Puckdropper -- Wise is the man who attempts to answer his question before asking it. To email me directly, send a message to puckdropper (at) fastmail.fm |
#144
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
|
#145
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
B A R R Y wrote:
J. Clarke wrote: Edwin, are _you_ going to buy me a new planer, new saw fences, a full set of twist, brad point, and Forstner bits, new wrenches and sockets, new tape measures and rulers, and redimension all my drawings? Saws, planers, and other stuff can care less about units. At worst, it's a new decal. So are you going to make these decals and give them to me? And on the planer, the thickness screw is calibrated in inches--a full turn of the screw will never work out to any even number of millimeters unless you replace the screw with one that has a different thread pitch. Most of us already have metric sockets, as even my Jeep Wrangler has metric bolts. So? -- -- --John to email, dial "usenet" and validate (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
#146
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
"J. Clarke" wrote in message Edwin, are _you_ going to buy me a new planer, new saw fences, a full set of twist, brad point, and Forstner bits, new wrenches and sockets, new tape measures and rulers, and redimension all my drawings? If not, are you going to pay me the the cost of all of this? If not, then why should I be in favor of something that puts me out of pocket a quite large amount of money and confers to me no benefit that I can discern. So tell me, exactly, why you need a new planer and saw fences? Mine not only do metric, they do Witworth too. Mine don't. At least not unless I take a meter stick to them or set the thickness by trial and error. -- -- --John to email, dial "usenet" and validate (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
#147
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
|
#148
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
On 14 Oct 2007 01:25:03 GMT, Puckdropper
wrote: "HeyBub" wrote in : *snip* Reality check: Do Japanese autos imported to the US have speedometers in KPH? My Japanese-made Prius switches when you press the button. As does my in-law's first generation Prius and the new Mazda 5 mini-minivan they just bought. Reality check... We have new US-built Chevy Malibu's at work, that can display in Kilometers or Miles, as well as a dash display that speaks at least four languages. In a Chevy! We have gobs of fun setting the display to other choices. G Both of my personal vehicles, a Jeep TJ and a Toyota pickup have analog meters with dual scales. As do most of my stationary and benchtop tools. The only big tool I own that dosen't have dual scales is my Performax 22-44 drum sander. Performax thoughtfully included the metric version for the user to install. To tune, adjust, and repair my tools, as well as all of the cars I've owned in the last 10-15 years, will require both metric and SAE tools. --------------------------------------------- ** http://www.bburke.com/woodworking.html ** --------------------------------------------- |
#149
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
dpb wrote:
Edwin Pawlowski wrote: "dpb" wrote in message Meanwhile, still knowing that a gallon of paint covers about 350 sq-ft... So will 4 liters That is the same as what you get in two of those big 67.6 ounce soda bottles. Wouldn't that be 3.8 l? -- Would that be an Imperial gallon or US gallon? |
#150
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
Ralph wrote in news:rppQi.10257$GO5.992@edtnps90:
dpb wrote: Edwin Pawlowski wrote: "dpb" wrote in message Meanwhile, still knowing that a gallon of paint covers about 350 sq-ft... So will 4 liters That is the same as what you get in two of those big 67.6 ounce soda bottles. Wouldn't that be 3.8 l? -- Would that be an Imperial gallon or US gallon? Let's keep things in perspective. 1 liter lead-free gas (Euro 95) costs about Euro 1,35 in Wageningen, the Netherlands 1 Euro = US $1.418 as of 10/14/07 1 gallon (US, liquid) = 3.78 liter So lead-free gas (Euro 95) costs: 3.78*1.418*1.35= US $7.24/gallon Near here in New Jersey, a cheap station (Woroco) sells unleaded regular for $2.45/gallon Happy driving in Europe! -- Best regards Han email address is invalid |
#151
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
"dpb" wrote in message I know of no company that doesn't make metric products for the export market if that is their target. It's a strawman argument. US automakers have switched, for example. Since you don't know of them they don't exist? I know of two companies that have not had success in Europe because they don't want to change to metric. Then they don't _really_ want the European market. One no longer tries, the other is going to make the change. So they've decided that they really want the export market and the other company has decided that it doesn't. None of this negates the original point. It may be a strawman argument today because the auto industry finally figured out it would be wise to change. They are still fighting right hand drive. -- -- --John to email, dial "usenet" and validate (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
#153
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
what the hell did I start?
on 10/12/2007 11:29 PM Mark & Juanita said the following:
Lee wrote: Thought I asked a simple question and it ended up with the "love it or leave it" crap(don't ask an American native about that ) and mail / credit cards. big grin Seems to be even anger being expressed. Oh well At least I got everyone thinking Well, it has been a couple of years since rec.ww has had a metric thread. Used to be one of these every couple of months. As you can see, it can generate a few comments. :-) If metric ever comes to this country (US), we should dress up as Amerinds and toss the whole lot into the harbor. :-) -- Bill In Hamptonburgh, NY To email, remove the double zeroes after @ |
#154
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
on 10/13/2007 6:52 AM charlieb said the following:
Lee wrote: I am getting a bit fed-up with the 15/32...13/64... and the rest of the crap measurements we use here. Why shouldn't I go to what the rest of the world uses? Metric. Please no political BS. Seems like using 10's is a lot easier.No I'm not too old to change (62).G Getting a Festool DOMINO forced me into metric. Thinking in metric took a while - 25.4 mm/inch a became one of those numbers to add to my instant recall list - which includes much harder to remember 7 and 10 digit phone numbers, PIN numbers, drivers license number, license plate numbers etc. No big deal. Lucky for you. With my CRS, I can't remember a 4 digit phone number between looking it up in the phone book and picking up the telephone handset. After a while I thought and calculated in metric when using the DOMINO. And calculating mainly in integers is a LOT easier than with mixed fractions. The DOMINO cuts mortises for loose/floating tenon joinery. When you're playing with mortise and tenons joinery, lets say for a table apron to leg joint, you want "outside faces" either flush or "set back" some specific distance. Working out where the center of the mortise in the leg should be, and where the center of the tenon, or the center of the mortise, in the end of the apron should be - in order to get the outside face flush, or set back a desired distance - can be "challenging if you use "imperial". MUCH easier using metric. Here's a link to a page that shows what I'm trying to describe. http://web.hypersurf.com/~charlie2/D...O_Reveals.html If you do ply "case work", there are several metric systems - and tools - to make producing parts quickly, accurately and efficiently. The "32 mm System" has been around for quite a while - for a reason. If you do solid wood furniture, and mill your own stock you don't need imperial or metric. If you need something to be "this tall" - you mark a stick for "this tall" and cut the needed parts "that long". If you need something to fit "between here and there" you use slip sticks to get "this wide" or "this long" and cut your parts "this wide" and "this long". No numbers at all required. And it's easy to find the centerline of a board. All that colonial furniture was done without measuring tapes or rulers, divided into 32nds or 64ths. I'm still using imperial, but the DOMINO is changing that. charlie b -- Bill In Hamptonburgh, NY To email, remove the double zeroes after @ |
#155
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
what the hell did I start?
"willshak" wrote in message If metric ever comes to this country (US), we should dress up as Amerinds and toss the whole lot into the harbor. :-) Better get dressed. Metric has been here for decades and is becoming more prominent all the time. |
#156
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
what the hell did I start?
On Oct 14, 7:06 pm, "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote:
"willshak" wrote in message If metric ever comes to this country (US), we should dress up as Amerinds and toss the whole lot into the harbor. :-) Better get dressed. Metric has been here for decades and is becoming more prominent all the time. What metric really is, is a transfer from design lab to fabrication floor. If the boys designed it in mm, they expect the quotes and subsequent samples to be all metric. It is not some kind of secret language, as you know, but a preferred method to some. Not all. Some. It is the close-minded "it's the USA-thereore BEST" crowd that hinders flexibility and advancements in adaptation to world markets. IOW... arrogance. Like Doug Miller. |
#157
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
Han wrote in
: *snip* Let's keep things in perspective. 1 liter lead-free gas (Euro 95) costs about Euro 1,35 in Wageningen, the Netherlands 1 Euro = US $1.418 as of 10/14/07 1 gallon (US, liquid) = 3.78 liter So lead-free gas (Euro 95) costs: 3.78*1.418*1.35= US $7.24/gallon Near here in New Jersey, a cheap station (Woroco) sells unleaded regular for $2.45/gallon Happy driving in Europe! What's the change in price over the last 5 years been in Europe? Puckdropper -- Wise is the man who attempts to answer his question before asking it. To email me directly, send a message to puckdropper (at) fastmail.fm |
#158
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
your thoughts on metric
Puckdropper wrote in news:4712b8d5$0$47128
: fHan wrote in : *snip* Let's keep things in perspective. 1 liter lead-free gas (Euro 95) costs about Euro 1,35 in Wageningen, the Netherlands 1 Euro = US $1.418 as of 10/14/07 1 gallon (US, liquid) = 3.78 liter So lead-free gas (Euro 95) costs: 3.78*1.418*1.35= US $7.24/gallon Near here in New Jersey, a cheap station (Woroco) sells unleaded regular for $2.45/gallon Happy driving in Europe! What's the change in price over the last 5 years been in Europe? Puckdropper Using the official exchange rate of $ vs euro, gas used to be twice as expensive in Europe as here in Jersey. Now it is a 3-fold difference. In part because the US$ has devalued so much. About 5 years ago, a euro was $0.85 or so. Now it is $1.42. From the perspective of worldwide competition, it is "good" for the US manufacturer and worker in the export fields. Eventually, it'll be rather bad for the ordinary consumer. -- Best regards Han email address is invalid |
#159
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
what the hell did I start?
"Robatoy" wrote in message
oups.com... On Oct 14, 7:06 pm, "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote: "willshak" wrote in message If metric ever comes to this country (US), we should dress up as Amerinds and toss the whole lot into the harbor. :-) Better get dressed. Metric has been here for decades and is becoming more prominent all the time. What metric really is, is a transfer from design lab to fabrication floor. If the boys designed it in mm, they expect the quotes and subsequent samples to be all metric. It is not some kind of secret language, as you know, but a preferred method to some. Not all. Some. It is the close-minded "it's the USA-thereore BEST" crowd that hinders flexibility and advancements in adaptation to world markets. IOW... arrogance. Like Doug Miller. It's not just the USA crowd. A lot of the people that make much loud noise against metric never use any measurement system of any kind. Those that absolutely need to use measurements every day, all day, are in the minority. When I was in university I heard some pretty heated arguments against metric from my musician friends, a very noisy lot indeed. Me and my physics buddies were just crying inside, since no amount of logic worked any kind of magic, and we just didn't have the volume needed to convince anyone of anything. I've been bitter every since. - Owen - |
#160
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
what the hell did I start?
"Robatoy" wrote in message What metric really is, is a transfer from design lab to fabrication floor. If the boys designed it in mm, they expect the quotes and subsequent samples to be all metric. At work we make custom molded parts both to customer specification and our designs to their finished product. I don't recall ever seeing a drawing with metric dimension until sometime maybe in the mid '80s. Now more than half are metric. Used to be too, drawings had dimensions like 12 5/8" that later became 12.625 with the advent of drawing programs, but now it is likely to be 12.62. I used to buy hydrauling supplies, hoses, etc from a local comapny. Whenw e go imported machines, they could not suppoy us. They told me "if it's metric, you're on your own" Five years later they were out of business, but my new supplier has everything I need. It is the close-minded "it's the USA-thereore BEST" crowd that hinders flexibility and advancements in adaptation to world markets. IOW... arrogance. I have to wonder where they will be in five, ten, fifteen years. Remember when the local gas station would not work on imported cars because they did not have the tools? -- Ed http://pages.cthome.net/edhome/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Metric tap set | Metalworking | |||
Where to get a metric grease gun? | Home Repair | |||
looking for new and used Metric endmills | Metalworking | |||
METRIC Rivets | Metalworking | |||
Inches or Metric? | UK diy |