Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#441
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:34:52 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Snit" wrote in message ... On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:55:17 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:18:06 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:14:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 00:45:22 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:34:04 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote : "Snit" wrote in message ... On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:28:52 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote : Snit wrote Commander Kinsey wrote Snit wrote research on reduction of abortions, That's not science, that's morals. If you want to reduce abortions, which most conservatives claim to want, there are known methods to do it. At least in American the Republican party (the more conservative of the two) rejects every one of these things. There "solution" is to deny women equal rights. Abortion has nothing to do with equal rights. Right. Denying people the right to one does. Wrong, Nothing unequal about it. Denying people equal rights ties into a conversation about equal rights. Don't think people should have abortions -- then don't have one. And, hey, I want to see there be fewer, so let's back policy which is known to reduce the number. WTF are you on about wanting to reduce the number? Are you saying women shouldn't be allowed to have them? Women should... but I would like to see the need be reduced. So this is nothing to do with abortions then. It's to do with you wanting to brainwash women into behaving differently. It is about giving them tools, educators, and choice. They already have all of that and choose to kill their unborn children. And so they should. Their children, not the state's children. So its fine to kill the born children when they turn out to be a nuisance ? Of course. Might aswell try again until you get a good one. If you create a replacement, technically you haven't killed anything, the same number of kids exist. You wouldn't have lasted long. Correct. -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#442
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:40:08 +0100, Snit wrote:
On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:35:57 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 23:10:03 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 23, 2021 at 11:25:18 AM MST, "%" wrote : On 2021-04-23 10:40 a.m., Snit wrote: On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:38:36 AM MST, "%" wrote : On 2021-04-23 9:22 a.m., Snit wrote: On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:20:42 AM MST, "%" wrote : On 2021-04-23 9:13 a.m., Snit wrote: On Apr 23, 2021 at 8:38:27 AM MST, "%" wrote : On 2021-04-22 8:19 p.m., Snit wrote: On Apr 22, 2021 at 8:08:16 PM MST, "%" wrote : On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote: On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote : On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote: On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote : On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote: On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate change. Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling. Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually has on world temperatures, let alone climate change. It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in the air. And the world was perfectly fine back then. There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels were as high as they are now. Why does man have to be there? Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am none too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in. one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone I am working on travel plans before that. you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any I'll grind it until it is ground. you're an organ grinder Only to those who really deserve it, and then I outsource the work. do you have a coin snatching monkey That's what she said. its what you should've asked her We asked each other. that's very emotional It was touching. do you have a youtube of it we could make some money I tried making some but the police said it was no good. Vote Libertarian. I prefer mature candidates. I prefer common sense. -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#443
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On May 5, 2021 at 11:32:18 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
: We asked each other. that's very emotional It was touching. do you have a youtube of it we could make some money I tried making some but the police said it was no good. Vote Libertarian. I prefer mature candidates. I prefer common sense. That comes with maturity. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#444
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
****, the Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
On Wed, 05 May 2021 19:07:41 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again: I prefer common sense. That comes with maturity. Obviously not in YOUR case, senile sucker of troll cock! |
#445
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:40:36 +0100, Snit wrote:
On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:35:04 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:35:52 +0100, FromTheRafters wrote: % formulated the question : On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote: On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate change. Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling. Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually has on world temperatures, let alone climate change. It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in the air. And the world was perfectly fine back then. There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels were as high as they are now. Why does man have to be there? Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am none too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in. one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone If by "blow up" you mean enter the Red Giant phase. Our Sun is not likely to explode. It's a slow explosion. If we keep using solar and sucking all that energy from the sun who knows what will happen! It is highly irresponsible to write things like that in here. Most Americans are stupid enough to believe you. -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#446
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:41:40 +0100, Snit wrote:
On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:34:41 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:46:21 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate change. Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling. Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually has on world temperatures, let alone climate change. It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in the air. And the world was perfectly fine back then. There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels were as high as they are now. Why does man have to be there? Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am none too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in. Surely you know that's not what I meant. Yes, you were trying to pretend that man's influence is not well understood because in the past there were other times of high CO2, though there were other reasons and none of the times it has been anywhere even near as high have the changes happened so quickly. You are working to push your intuition, based on faith, over the science. No, I was pointing out the earth survives high CO2 levels just fine because it did in the past. And that we would manage also. You do know how much CO2 is required to kill you, right? -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#447
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 21:32:57 +0100, Snit wrote:
On Apr 29, 2021 at 12:35:52 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:49:39 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 25, 2021 at 11:43:52 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : Grossly overreacting was therefore a trait that needed removing for the next generation. Nope because it means they do much better with the non pandemic infections and don't have to bother to wash their hands all the time and can get away with doing what is more convenient like not throwing away food that has had a fly walk on it etc etc etc. Having a trait that makes you better at 9 things but worse at another, getting you killed, is not a good trait to have. Say you could do calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect pitch, you could do 1000 pushups, but the sight of a car made you spontaneously combust. That would not be a good thing to have. By your reasoning, you would be called superior, and have a hired help to warn you of approaching cars. You have no right to say who should not be saved. You have no right to intervene in evolution and keep the worthless alive. Back to your deserted island you go. That's all that will be left if the governments keep allowing inferior genetics to continue. -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#448
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:40:43 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:34:37 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:28:34 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:24:27 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:28:16 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:09:40 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 16, 2021 at 11:00:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote : On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever here of Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal? Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both worlds. In general the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants, particularly the 'gimme that old time religion' branch. In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that is no longer the case. There are still some religious scientists, but scientists tend to be atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also tend to be more liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US conservatives tend to reject our best evidence. Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free. Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to deny evidence. We can see this with COVID, No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing that kills 4 times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world population growth. man-made global climate change, It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is no global warming. research on reduction of abortions, That's not science, that's morals. and in some cases even things like evolution. Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the weak. Nope, because it mostly kills those way past reproducing. Irrelevant if it kills those or not. And they can hide indoors. The point is we should let it kill off any younger folk that it can, as they're the weaker ones. In fact there isnt any evidence that it does kill of the weaker ones. The Spanish Flu didn't, in fact it killed off the stronger ones because their much better immune system grossly over reacted and it was the cytokine storm that killed them very quickly. Grossly overreacting was therefore a trait that needed removing for the next generation. Nope because it means they do much better with the non pandemic infections and don't have to bother to wash their hands all the time and can get away with doing what is more convenient like not throwing away food that has had a fly walk on it etc etc etc. Having a trait that makes you better at 9 things but worse at another, getting you killed, is not a good trait to have. Depends on the death rate. The death rate of coronavirus is high enough to remove those with the wrong genes. Nope, the death rate is minimal with those who can still reproduce. It isnt even that high with those over 70 either, below 4% So why worry? We must let it happen. Nope, it would make no difference. It would remove those with ****ty immune systems, creating a better next generation. In fact we evolved like that with kids sure that nothing can kill them and in fact that works fine. What kids are you referring to? Late teenagers. That why they have always been the cannon fodder in wars. Even those now don't die at a high enough rate from anything to have any real effect on evolution, even if we scrapped seat belts, air bags, cars with crumple zones etc etc etc. They would if we stopped pampering them in hospitals. Say you could do calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect pitch, you could do 1000 pushups, but the sight of a car made you spontaneously combust. That would not be a good thing to have. Yes but we never have evolved to have the sight of a car make you spontaneously combust for some odd reason. It's called an analogy, stretching something out of proportion to mare you see the point. No one get to mare me and don't you forget that, cow face. In Dutch I was announcing you. How did I miss the K and hit the R? They're miles away! -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#449
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Sun, 02 May 2021 09:30:57 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 01/05/2021 19:23, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 06:28:13 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 25/04/2021 19:52, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 19:52:41 +0100, Tim Streater wrote: On 22 Apr 2021 at 19:25:48 BST, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:32:42 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 21/04/2021 19:10, Commander Kinsey wrote: Surely you must agree that people refusing to believe the earth goes round the sun for 100 years slowed down advances in physics? Not as much as simple minded people believing that it does... Please don't post after 5 joints. The Sun and the Earth orbit around their common centre of mass. If you're OCD, otherwise "around the sun" is near enough. Well no, that not nearly near enough., they all in fact orbit round te C of G of the galaxy...oh noes, and that's is orbiting around...the c of G of the unknown universe, Or if you 'believe Einstein' nothing is orbiting anything, just rolling around curved tracks made by bent space. Its a shame you are so thick. There is an amazing world out there. possibly. You don't need 100% accuracy for everything you do. For most things in your house, you can use basic Newtonian mechanics for example. Its not a question of accuracy. 'what you use', and 'what is true' may bear no relationship to one another. This is the Great Mistake of the Realists. Because the picture of the world that Science draws *works*, the Realists hold that it is 'strong evidence' that it is *true*'. And burble on about 'Scientific Truths'. But Einstein proved conclusively that because Newtonian Mechanics *worked*, didn't make it in the least bit *true*. His picture of the world was completely different, and worked marginally better. At this point intelligent scientists realised that what the philosophers had been saying all along was in fact more true than their theories - Kant, Schopenhauer, Hume, Popper - science doesn't 'discover truth' - it 'invents theories', and tests them to see if they *work*. Sadly intelligent scientists are less than one in a thousand. Most scientists are still Realists. If I'm working out how long it takes my car to stop, I don't need to use relativity or quantum mechanics. My calculations will be off, but not by enough to matter. -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#450
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Sun, 02 May 2021 19:14:02 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 19:22:29 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:00:20 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:44:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:34:32 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:10:05 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 16, 2021 at 10:59:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split. In English please. The two have a history that is tied together. I doubt it. Its true anyway. Religion did not help science. Yes it did, if only because a lot of the professionally religious had a lot time on their hands that allowed them to do science. Just because some scientists were religious means nothing. In earlier times it was in fact almost all of them. If there had been no religion, those same people would still have become scientists. Nope, they wouldn't have been in religious institutions with a lot of time on their hands as parasites on the community. Mendel would have had to get off his lard arse and earn a living. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor...ife_and_career Inventing things is a living. He would have got the same food and accommodation if he had just grovelled to some god or other instead of doing something useful. Einstein managed to earn money as a patent clerk, and invent ****. He didn't actually invent anything much when he was a patent clerk Didn't have to, that earned him enough money to go invent later. That utterly mangles what actually happened. He didn't save up what the patent office payed him and did the inventing with that money. Of course he did, he was a tight Jew. and was stupid enough to believe in some god too. I doubt his religion played any part in creating his theories. It did actually. He ran that stupid line 'god does not play dice with the universe' If god had wished us to know about the universe would he not have told us? Unlikely that some arsehole who just yawned when 6M of its alleged chosen people were gassed and cremated by Adolf and his henchmen. Presumably he chose to lie to them about being chosen people and was ****ing himself and laughing as they got gassed etc. Or the whole world is a computer game and the guy playing Hitler got a new high score. Pity about radioactive decay alone. Randomness is simply lack of detailed knowledge. Take flipping a coin. If you know enough about how hard you spin it etc, you can work out what side it will land on. Doesn't work with radioactive decay. I don't believe you, there must be a way of calculating it precisely. -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#451
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Sun, 02 May 2021 20:30:12 +0100, Snit wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:51:01 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 26, 2021 at 10:54:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:03:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Snit" wrote in message ... On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:54:38 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:05:23 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind "Snit" repetitively ****ted the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is. Tedious, isn't he? What Rod Speed ran from: More of you lies, that troll**** is what I flushed, repeatedly. Snit is what's called a floater. I do tend to have multiple social groups. That's your left wing never stop talking problem. I miss Trumps silent ways. Intelligence is the ability to make your point concisely and clearly. The left wing cannot do that. -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#452
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Mon, 03 May 2021 08:58:58 +0100, Snit wrote:
rbowman wrote: On 05/02/2021 01:30 PM, Snit wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:53:50 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 27, 2021 at 10:53:26 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 20:37:00 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 24, 2021 at 11:30:05 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:01:42 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 22, 2021 at 3:16:17 AM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote : I wonder why nobody ever says just "It's". For example: John: "That engine's not running right." Steve: "It's." Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally pronounce the word "can't". Without the t. So it sounds more like "can". https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E You bugger. Bet I will focus on that bloody word every time its used now. Just watched the first ep of the Manson tapes and didn=E2=80=99t. Corse that might just be because it is so ****ing bizarre. I have caught it in some speech I hear. Have a friend who insists it just cannot be true. I talk to her on Zoom -- she has agreed to let me record her without her knowing (at the time) and then see how SHE sounds). She insists she ALWAYS pronounced the T. Will be interesting to find out. Yanks can't even pronounce herb with the H. We can if it is a name. By the way, I did look for UK specific examples of "can't". Here is what I found: https://youtu.be/dGnBi6giZw0 Those are examples from the UK. "Can't" is still pronounced as "can" (in many cases). I listened to the first guy and he clearly said carnt. Check your ears. There is a slight r. Common in British English? It's not slight. It's the same as saying tarnished. Would you mishear that as tannished? Im still focused on the lack of a real T in cant. Just weird. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjwqgghyW-Y 'Put the O Back in ****ry' Shooter Jennings What's a missing letter? When cant is pronounced as can you would think it would risk confusion. Except I've never known anyone do that, including in your video. -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#453
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Tue, 04 May 2021 03:03:47 +0100, rbowman wrote:
On 05/03/2021 11:29 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:30:26 +0100, rbowman wrote: On 04/26/2021 11:53 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote: I doubt his religion played any part in creating his theories. In a way it did. He fervently believed in a steady state universe and created a 'cosmological constant' (fudge factor) to make his equations work. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_constant I don't know if his belief derived from Judaism but it was strong enough to ignore what his math was telling him. Don't need religion to do that. Just the intelligence to know that the maths isn't quite right. Well, that point went over your head at 30,000 feet and climbing... Then get better at explaining. -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#454
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On Wed, 05 May 2021 20:07:41 +0100, Snit wrote:
On May 5, 2021 at 11:32:18 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : We asked each other. that's very emotional It was touching. do you have a youtube of it we could make some money I tried making some but the police said it was no good. Vote Libertarian. I prefer mature candidates. I prefer common sense. That comes with maturity. No, you lose it with maturity and brainwashing. -- Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated. |
#455
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:40:43 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:34:37 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:28:34 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:24:27 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:28:16 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:09:40 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 16, 2021 at 11:00:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote : On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever here of Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal? Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both worlds. In general the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants, particularly the 'gimme that old time religion' branch. In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that is no longer the case. There are still some religious scientists, but scientists tend to be atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also tend to be more liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US conservatives tend to reject our best evidence. Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free. Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to deny evidence. We can see this with COVID, No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing that kills 4 times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world population growth. man-made global climate change, It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is no global warming. research on reduction of abortions, That's not science, that's morals. and in some cases even things like evolution. Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the weak. Nope, because it mostly kills those way past reproducing. Irrelevant if it kills those or not. And they can hide indoors. The point is we should let it kill off any younger folk that it can, as they're the weaker ones. In fact there isnt any evidence that it does kill of the weaker ones. The Spanish Flu didn't, in fact it killed off the stronger ones because their much better immune system grossly over reacted and it was the cytokine storm that killed them very quickly. Grossly overreacting was therefore a trait that needed removing for the next generation. Nope because it means they do much better with the non pandemic infections and don't have to bother to wash their hands all the time and can get away with doing what is more convenient like not throwing away food that has had a fly walk on it etc etc etc. Having a trait that makes you better at 9 things but worse at another, getting you killed, is not a good trait to have. Depends on the death rate. The death rate of coronavirus is high enough to remove those with the wrong genes. Nope, the death rate is minimal with those who can still reproduce. It isnt even that high with those over 70 either, below 4% So why worry? Because most of those it has killed would prefer to not be dead. We must let it happen. Nope, it would make no difference. It would remove those with ****ty immune systems, Nope, creating a better next generation. Nope, because the vast bulk of those it kills are way past reproducing. In fact we evolved like that with kids sure that nothing can kill them and in fact that works fine. What kids are you referring to? Late teenagers. That why they have always been the cannon fodder in wars. Even those now don't die at a high enough rate from anything to have any real effect on evolution, even if we scrapped seat belts, air bags, cars with crumple zones etc etc etc. They would if we stopped pampering them in hospitals. Nope, **** all of those ever need hospital treatment to stop them dying. Say you could do calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect pitch, you could do 1000 pushups, but the sight of a car made you spontaneously combust. That would not be a good thing to have. Yes but we never have evolved to have the sight of a car make you spontaneously combust for some odd reason. It's called an analogy, stretching something out of proportion to mare you see the point. No one get to mare me and don't you forget that, cow face. In Dutch I was announcing you. How did I miss the K and hit the R? They're miles away! You were blotto and drug crazed, as always. |
#456
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sun, 02 May 2021 19:14:02 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 19:22:29 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:00:20 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:44:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:34:32 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Commander Kinsey" wrote in message news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:10:05 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 16, 2021 at 10:59:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in. The silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And not even in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is awful today". Turns out the admin was a religious nutter. Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case. You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not impeded science. Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split. In English please. The two have a history that is tied together. I doubt it. Its true anyway. Religion did not help science. Yes it did, if only because a lot of the professionally religious had a lot time on their hands that allowed them to do science. Just because some scientists were religious means nothing. In earlier times it was in fact almost all of them. If there had been no religion, those same people would still have become scientists. Nope, they wouldn't have been in religious institutions with a lot of time on their hands as parasites on the community. Mendel would have had to get off his lard arse and earn a living. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor...ife_and_career Inventing things is a living. He would have got the same food and accommodation if he had just grovelled to some god or other instead of doing something useful. Einstein managed to earn money as a patent clerk, and invent ****. He didn't actually invent anything much when he was a patent clerk Didn't have to, that earned him enough money to go invent later. That utterly mangles what actually happened. He didn't save up what the patent office payed him and did the inventing with that money. Of course he did, he was a tight Jew. and was stupid enough to believe in some god too. I doubt his religion played any part in creating his theories. It did actually. He ran that stupid line 'god does not play dice with the universe' If god had wished us to know about the universe would he not have told us? Unlikely that some arsehole who just yawned when 6M of its alleged chosen people were gassed and cremated by Adolf and his henchmen. Presumably he chose to lie to them about being chosen people and was ****ing himself and laughing as they got gassed etc. Or the whole world is a computer game They didn't have computer games in those days. and the guy playing Hitler got a new high score. In fact the bugger lost so spectacularly he had to shoot himself and his slut. Pity about radioactive decay alone. Randomness is simply lack of detailed knowledge. Take flipping a coin. If you know enough about how hard you spin it etc, you can work out what side it will land on. Doesn't work with radioactive decay. I don't believe you, there must be a way of calculating it precisely. No there isnt with radioactive decay because there is nothing to calculate. |
#457
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
The Two Inseparable Trolling Resident Sociopaths together again
On Sat, 8 May 2021 04:45:16 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic blather -- Typical retarded "conversation" between the Scottish ****** and the senile Ozzietard: Birdbrain: "Horse **** doesn't stink." Senile Rodent: "It does if you roll in it." Birdbrain: "I've never worked out why, I assumed it was maybe meateaters that made stinky ****, but then why does vegetarian human **** stink? Is it just the fact that we're capable of digesting meat?" Senile Rodent: "Nope, some cow **** stinks too." Message-ID: |
#458
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
The Two Brain Dead Inseparable Trolling Resident Sociopaths together again
On Sat, 8 May 2021 04:39:37 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic blather -- Another typical retarded "conversation" between Birdbrain and senile Rodent: Senile Rodent: " Did you ever dig a hole to bury your own ****?" Birdbrain: "I do if there's no flush toilet around." Senile Rodent: "Yeah, I prefer camping like that, off by myself with no dunnys around and have always buried the ****." MID: |
#459
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On May 7, 2021 at 10:51:20 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
: On Mon, 03 May 2021 08:58:58 +0100, Snit wrote: rbowman wrote: On 05/02/2021 01:30 PM, Snit wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:53:50 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 27, 2021 at 10:53:26 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 20:37:00 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 24, 2021 at 11:30:05 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:01:42 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 22, 2021 at 3:16:17 AM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote : I wonder why nobody ever says just "It's". For example: John: "That engine's not running right." Steve: "It's." Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally pronounce the word "can't". Without the t. So it sounds more like "can". https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E You bugger. Bet I will focus on that bloody word every time its used now. Just watched the first ep of the Manson tapes and didn=3DE2=3D80=3D99t. Corse that might just be because it is so ****ing bizarre. I have caught it in some speech I hear. Have a friend who insists it just cannot be true. I talk to her on Zoom -- she has agreed to let me record her without her knowing (at the time) and then see how SHE sounds). She insists she ALWAYS pronounced the T. Will be interesting to find out. Yanks can't even pronounce herb with the H. We can if it is a name. By the way, I did look for UK specific examples of "can't". Here is what I found: https://youtu.be/dGnBi6giZw0 Those are examples from the UK. "Can't" is still pronounced as "can" (in many cases). I listened to the first guy and he clearly said carnt. Check your ears. There is a slight r. Common in British English? It's not slight. It's the same as saying tarnished. Would you mishear that as tannished? I=E2=80=99m still focused on the lack of a real T in can=E2=80=99t. Just weird. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DCjwqgghyW-Y 'Put the O Back in ****ry' Shooter Jennings What's a missing letter? When can=E2=80=99t is pronounced as can you would think it would risk confusion. Except I've never known anyone do that, including in your video. All I can say is watch the videos I showed. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#460
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On May 7, 2021 at 10:35:35 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
: On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:40:36 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:35:04 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:35:52 +0100, FromTheRafters wrote: % formulated the question : On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote: On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate change. Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling. Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually has on world temperatures, let alone climate change. It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in the air. And the world was perfectly fine back then. There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels were as high as they are now. Why does man have to be there? Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am none too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in. one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone If by "blow up" you mean enter the Red Giant phase. Our Sun is not likely to explode. It's a slow explosion. If we keep using solar and sucking all that energy from the sun who knows what will happen! It is highly irresponsible to write things like that in here. Most Americans are stupid enough to believe you. Not sure it's most, but far too many. Sigh. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#461
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On May 7, 2021 at 10:54:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
: On Wed, 05 May 2021 20:07:41 +0100, Snit wrote: On May 5, 2021 at 11:32:18 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : We asked each other. that's very emotional It was touching. do you have a youtube of it we could make some money I tried making some but the police said it was no good. Vote Libertarian. I prefer mature candidates. I prefer common sense. That comes with maturity. No, you lose it with maturity and brainwashing. Really the whole idea of "common sense" is all too often just tied to what each person thinks is correct. I am not against it -- and am very "MacGyverish" in how I problem solve, but for things that matter I tend to look to more verifiable evidence. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#462
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On May 7, 2021 at 10:36:54 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
: On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:41:40 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:34:41 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:46:21 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate change. Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling. Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually has on world temperatures, let alone climate change. It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in the air. And the world was perfectly fine back then. There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels were as high as they are now. Why does man have to be there? Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am none too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in. Surely you know that's not what I meant. Yes, you were trying to pretend that man's influence is not well understood because in the past there were other times of high CO2, though there were other reasons and none of the times it has been anywhere even near as high have the changes happened so quickly. You are working to push your intuition, based on faith, over the science. No, I was pointing out the earth survives high CO2 levels just fine because it did in the past. And that we would manage also. You do know how much CO2 is required to kill you, right? The earth will survive the harm we are causing... but we are in a great extinction and it may end up including humans. We rely on many other species and the ecosystems we are destroying. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#463
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On May 7, 2021 at 10:50:33 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
: On Sun, 02 May 2021 20:30:12 +0100, Snit wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:51:01 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 26, 2021 at 10:54:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:03:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Snit" wrote in message ... On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:54:38 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:05:23 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind "Snit" repetitively ****ted the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is. Tedious, isn't he? What Rod Speed ran from: More of you lies, that troll**** is what I flushed, repeatedly. Snit is what's called a floater. I do tend to have multiple social groups. That's your left wing never stop talking problem. I miss Trump=E2=80=99s silent ways. Intelligence is the ability to make your point concisely and clearly. The left wing cannot do that. That is not really what intelligence is, but I can be quite clear and concise: I back equal rights and environmental protection, as well as evidence based policies and investment into the future of the society. How about you? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#464
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On May 7, 2021 at 10:42:31 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
: On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 21:32:57 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 29, 2021 at 12:35:52 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:49:39 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 25, 2021 at 11:43:52 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : Grossly overreacting was therefore a trait that needed removing for the next generation. Nope because it means they do much better with the non pandemic infections and don't have to bother to wash their hands all the time and can get away with doing what is more convenient like not throwing away food that has had a fly walk on it etc etc etc. Having a trait that makes you better at 9 things but worse at another, getting you killed, is not a good trait to have. Say you could do calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect pitch, you could do 1000 pushups, but the sight of a car made you spontaneously combust. That would not be a good thing to have. By your reasoning, you would be called superior, and have a hired help to warn you of approaching cars. You have no right to say who should not be saved. You have no right to intervene in evolution and keep the worthless alive. Back to your deserted island you go. That's all that will be left if the governments keep allowing inferior genetics to continue. Sounds like you back Nazis and Trump. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#465
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
****, the Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:03:34 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again: Sounds like you back Nazis and Trump. Sounds more like you are totally addicted to the unwashed Scottish ******'s cock, right, **** the Git? BG |
#466
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
****, the Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:47:33 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again: All I can say is watch the videos I showed. All HE needs to say is "jump!" and jump you will, INSTANTLY, every time, you devoted sucker of troll cock! LOL |
#467
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
****, the Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:47:51 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again: Not sure it's most, but far too many. Sigh. You are obviously totally unable to wean your toothless senile gob away from the trolling ******'s cock, eh, **** the Git? LOL |
#468
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
****, the Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:50:37 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again: The earth will survive the harm we are causing... but we are in a great extinction and it may end up including humans. We rely on many other species and the ecosystems we are destroying. STILL hoping you might eventually win this game, my newest senile punching bag? HILARIOUS! LOL |
#469
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
****, the Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:51:26 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again: That is not really what intelligence is, but I can be quite clear and concise: I back equal rights and environmental protection, as well as evidence based policies and investment into the future of the society. How about you? HE enjoys you sucking him off, every time he shows up to get sucked off by you, senile sucker of troll cock! BG |
#470
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
****, the Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:49:20 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again: Really the whole idea of "common sense" is all too often just tied to what each person thinks is correct. I am not against it -- and am very "MacGyverish" in how I problem solve, but for things that matter I tend to look to more verifiable evidence. You're just a bull****ting senile HUGE ASSHOLE, **** the Git! LOL |
#471
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On May 7, 2021 at 10:49:39 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
: If god had wished us to know about the universe would he not have told us? Unlikely that some arsehole who just yawned when 6M of its alleged chosen people were gassed and cremated by Adolf and his henchmen. Presumably he chose to lie to them about being chosen people and was ****ing himself and laughing as they got gassed etc. Or the whole world is a computer game and the guy playing Hitler got a new high score. Pity about radioactive decay alone. Randomness is simply lack of detailed knowledge. Take flipping a coin. If you know enough about how hard you spin it etc, you can work out what side it will land on. Doesn't work with radioactive decay. I don't believe you, there must be a way of calculating it precisely. I share your same intuition... but there is no evidence to back it. This is a good example of where "common sense" and evidence might clash. Common sense says there is an underlying mechanism that is deterministic, but the evidence at least for now does not support that. Then we can get into really weird stuff like the double slit experiment and strange attraction. Not that I am anything close to an expert in those, but common sense does not apply there! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#472
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
****, the Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
On Fri, 07 May 2021 21:05:32 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again: I share your same intuition... You share more than just his intuition, senile sucker of troll cock! LOL |
#473
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
"Snit" wrote in message ... On May 7, 2021 at 10:36:54 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:41:40 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:34:41 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:46:21 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate change. Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling. Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually has on world temperatures, let alone climate change. It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in the air. And the world was perfectly fine back then. There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels were as high as they are now. Why does man have to be there? Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am none too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in. Surely you know that's not what I meant. Yes, you were trying to pretend that man's influence is not well understood because in the past there were other times of high CO2, though there were other reasons and none of the times it has been anywhere even near as high have the changes happened so quickly. You are working to push your intuition, based on faith, over the science. No, I was pointing out the earth survives high CO2 levels just fine because it did in the past. And that we would manage also. You do know how much CO2 is required to kill you, right? The earth will survive the harm we are causing... Its far from clear that we are actually doing great harm at all, particularly when compared with what the ice ages did. but we are in a great extinction Bull****. and it may end up including humans. No chance. We even survived the ice ages. We rely on many other species Only a few actually. and the ecosystems we are destroying. The ice ages destroyed far more and we survived that fine. |
#474
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
"Snit" wrote in message ... On May 7, 2021 at 10:50:33 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Sun, 02 May 2021 20:30:12 +0100, Snit wrote: Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:51:01 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 26, 2021 at 10:54:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:03:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: "Snit" wrote in message ... On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:54:38 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:05:23 +0100, Rod Speed wrote: Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind "Snit" repetitively ****ted the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is. Tedious, isn't he? What Rod Speed ran from: More of you lies, that troll**** is what I flushed, repeatedly. Snit is what's called a floater. I do tend to have multiple social groups. That's your left wing never stop talking problem. I miss Trump=E2=80=99s silent ways. Intelligence is the ability to make your point concisely and clearly. The left wing cannot do that. That is not really what intelligence is, but I can be quite clear and concise: I back equal rights and environmental protection, as well as evidence based policies and investment into the future of the society. How about you? You are both completely irrelevant with both. |
#475
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On May 7, 2021 at 5:01:01 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
: "Snit" wrote in message ... On May 7, 2021 at 10:36:54 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:41:40 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:34:41 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:46:21 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate change. Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling. Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually has on world temperatures, let alone climate change. It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in the air. And the world was perfectly fine back then. There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels were as high as they are now. Why does man have to be there? Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am none too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in. Surely you know that's not what I meant. Yes, you were trying to pretend that man's influence is not well understood because in the past there were other times of high CO2, though there were other reasons and none of the times it has been anywhere even near as high have the changes happened so quickly. You are working to push your intuition, based on faith, over the science. No, I was pointing out the earth survives high CO2 levels just fine because it did in the past. And that we would manage also. You do know how much CO2 is required to kill you, right? The earth will survive the harm we are causing... Its far from clear that we are actually doing great harm at all, particularly when compared with what the ice ages did. We are in a great extinction, or at least likely so, and seeing the impacts now. If you want to learn more about it this is a good site to get started: http://climate.nasa.gov but we are in a great extinction Bull****. There is some debate -- but it seems likely. and it may end up including humans. No chance. We even survived the ice ages. The ice ages man made it through (the most recent one) did not lead to a great extinction. We rely on many other species Only a few actually. Quite a few... give how they rely on each other. And we benefit from many more. and the ecosystems we are destroying. The ice ages destroyed far more and we survived that fine. You are trying to equate all of the ice ages. The one man made it through was not a big one. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#476
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
"Snit" wrote in message ... On May 7, 2021 at 5:01:01 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote : "Snit" wrote in message ... On May 7, 2021 at 10:36:54 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:41:40 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:34:41 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:46:21 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate change. Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling. Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually has on world temperatures, let alone climate change. It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in the air. And the world was perfectly fine back then. There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels were as high as they are now. Why does man have to be there? Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am none too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in. Surely you know that's not what I meant. Yes, you were trying to pretend that man's influence is not well understood because in the past there were other times of high CO2, though there were other reasons and none of the times it has been anywhere even near as high have the changes happened so quickly. You are working to push your intuition, based on faith, over the science. No, I was pointing out the earth survives high CO2 levels just fine because it did in the past. And that we would manage also. You do know how much CO2 is required to kill you, right? The earth will survive the harm we are causing... Its far from clear that we are actually doing great harm at all, particularly when compared with what the ice ages did. We are in a great extinction, Bull**** we are. or at least likely so, More bull****. and seeing the impacts now. More bull****. If you want to learn more about it this is a good site to get started: http://climate.nasa.gov More bull****. Its just the spewing of the MMGCC cult. but we are in a great extinction Bull****. There is some debate -- but it seems likely. Bull****. and it may end up including humans. No chance. We even survived the ice ages. The ice ages man made it through (the most recent one) did not lead to a great extinction. Bull****. We rely on many other species Only a few actually. Quite a few... give how they rely on each other. And we benefit from many more. More bull****. and the ecosystems we are destroying. The ice ages destroyed far more and we survived that fine. You are trying to equate all of the ice ages. Nope, rubbing your stupid nose in the fact that they destroyed far more ecosystems than man has done. The one man made it through was not a big one. But they destroyed far more ecosystems than man ever has. |
#477
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On May 7, 2021 at 5:17:04 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
: "Snit" wrote in message ... On May 7, 2021 at 5:01:01 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote : "Snit" wrote in message ... On May 7, 2021 at 10:36:54 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:41:40 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:34:41 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:46:21 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate change. Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling. Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually has on world temperatures, let alone climate change. It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in the air. And the world was perfectly fine back then. There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels were as high as they are now. Why does man have to be there? Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am none too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in. Surely you know that's not what I meant. Yes, you were trying to pretend that man's influence is not well understood because in the past there were other times of high CO2, though there were other reasons and none of the times it has been anywhere even near as high have the changes happened so quickly. You are working to push your intuition, based on faith, over the science. No, I was pointing out the earth survives high CO2 levels just fine because it did in the past. And that we would manage also. You do know how much CO2 is required to kill you, right? The earth will survive the harm we are causing... Its far from clear that we are actually doing great harm at all, particularly when compared with what the ice ages did. We are in a great extinction, Bull**** we are. or at least likely so, More bull****. and seeing the impacts now. More bull****. If you want to learn more about it this is a good site to get started: http://climate.nasa.gov More bull****. Its just the spewing of the MMGCC cult. but we are in a great extinction Bull****. There is some debate -- but it seems likely. Bull****. and it may end up including humans. No chance. We even survived the ice ages. The ice ages man made it through (the most recent one) did not lead to a great extinction. Bull****. We rely on many other species Only a few actually. Quite a few... give how they rely on each other. And we benefit from many more. More bull****. and the ecosystems we are destroying. The ice ages destroyed far more and we survived that fine. You are trying to equate all of the ice ages. Nope, rubbing your stupid nose in the fact that they destroyed far more ecosystems than man has done. The one man made it through was not a big one. But they destroyed far more ecosystems than man ever has. You reject evidence and just cry "bull****". OK. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
#478
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On 05/07/2021 11:52 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 04 May 2021 03:03:47 +0100, rbowman wrote: On 05/03/2021 11:29 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 02:30:26 +0100, rbowman wrote: On 04/26/2021 11:53 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote: I doubt his religion played any part in creating his theories. In a way it did. He fervently believed in a steady state universe and created a 'cosmological constant' (fudge factor) to make his equations work. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_constant I don't know if his belief derived from Judaism but it was strong enough to ignore what his math was telling him. Don't need religion to do that. Just the intelligence to know that the maths isn't quite right. Well, that point went over your head at 30,000 feet and climbing... Then get better at explaining. I don't write Monty Python scripts. You miss it, you miss it. That seems to be par for British humor. Take a mildly amusing gag and beat it to death until the dumbest Scot finally gets the joke. |
#479
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
"Snit" wrote in message ... On May 7, 2021 at 5:17:04 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote : "Snit" wrote in message ... On May 7, 2021 at 5:01:01 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote : "Snit" wrote in message ... On May 7, 2021 at 10:36:54 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:41:40 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:34:41 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:46:21 +0100, Snit wrote: On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote : And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate change. Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling. Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually has on world temperatures, let alone climate change. It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in the air. And the world was perfectly fine back then. There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels were as high as they are now. Why does man have to be there? Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am none too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in. Surely you know that's not what I meant. Yes, you were trying to pretend that man's influence is not well understood because in the past there were other times of high CO2, though there were other reasons and none of the times it has been anywhere even near as high have the changes happened so quickly. You are working to push your intuition, based on faith, over the science. No, I was pointing out the earth survives high CO2 levels just fine because it did in the past. And that we would manage also. You do know how much CO2 is required to kill you, right? The earth will survive the harm we are causing... Its far from clear that we are actually doing great harm at all, particularly when compared with what the ice ages did. We are in a great extinction, Bull**** we are. or at least likely so, More bull****. and seeing the impacts now. More bull****. If you want to learn more about it this is a good site to get started: http://climate.nasa.gov More bull****. Its just the spewing of the MMGCC cult. but we are in a great extinction Bull****. There is some debate -- but it seems likely. Bull****. and it may end up including humans. No chance. We even survived the ice ages. The ice ages man made it through (the most recent one) did not lead to a great extinction. Bull****. We rely on many other species Only a few actually. Quite a few... give how they rely on each other. And we benefit from many more. More bull****. and the ecosystems we are destroying. The ice ages destroyed far more and we survived that fine. You are trying to equate all of the ice ages. Nope, rubbing your stupid nose in the fact that they destroyed far more ecosystems than man has done. The one man made it through was not a big one. But they destroyed far more ecosystems than man ever has. You reject evidence You presented no evidence what so ever. |
#480
Posted to alt.computer.workshop,alt.home.repair,uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Spank!
On May 7, 2021 at 7:13:46 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
: Nope, rubbing your stupid nose in the fact that they destroyed far more ecosystems than man has done. The one man made it through was not a big one. But they destroyed far more ecosystems than man ever has. You reject evidence You presented no evidence what so ever. Happy to: http://climate.nasa.gov https://www.newscientist.com/article-topic/climate-change/ https://www.yaleclimatemediaforum.org/ https://climatecrocks.com/ https://insideclimatenews.org/ https://www.climatecentral.org/ https://www.who.int/health-topics/climate-change#tab=tab_1 https://www.historicalclimatology.com/features https://skepticalscience.com/ https://whistleblower.org/climate-science-watch/ https://grist.org/ https://climatenexus.org/ https://www.dailyclimate.org/ https://www.theclimategroup.org/ https://www.realclimate.org/ We can also look at peer reviewed articles: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=climate+change Lots more. But here is the thing -- you have already made up your mind that you wish to reject evidence. It is predictable you will. Seeing evidence will not change your view because you have made it clear you are immune to evidence. Nothing about this is complex. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Spank! | Home Repair | |||
SPANK ON PINKO SENSEI THE DOUCHELICKER | Woodworking |