On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 19:46:21 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct

It WILL become extinct with "men" like you who prefer sucking cock, senile
sucker of troll cock!

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 05:28:34 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

--
TYPICAL retarded "conversation" between sociopath Rodent and sociopath
Birdbrain from August 26th 2018:

Birdbrain: "I have one head but 5 fingers."

Senile Rodent: "Obvious lie. You hairy legged cross dressers are so inbred
that you all have two heads."

Birdbrain: "You're the one that likes hairy legs remember?"

Senile Rodent: "The problem isnt the hairy legs, it's the gross inbreeding
that
produces two headed unemployables like you."

Birdbrain: "So why did you mention hairy legs?"

Senile Rodent: "Because that's what those who arent actually stupid enough
to shave their legs have."

Birdbrain: "You only have hairy legs if both of the following are true:
1) You're quite far back on the evolutionary scale.
2) You haven't learned what a razor is for."

Senile Rodent: "Only a terminal ****wit or a woman shaves their legs."

Birdbrain: "There is literally zero point in having hair all over your
body."

Senile Rodent: "There is even less point in wasting your time changing what
you are born with."

MID:

On 22 Apr 2021 18:52:41 GMT, Dim Streater, the brain dead, troll-feeding,
senile idiot, blathered again:



The Sun and the Earth orbit around their common centre of mass.

Trolls and troll-feeding assholes like you orbit around each other! BG

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

you're an organ grinder

On Apr 22, 2021 at 8:08:16 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

you're an organ grinder

Only to those who really deserve it, and then I outsource the work.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 22/04/2021 19:25, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:32:42 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 21/04/2021 19:10, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Surely you must agree that people refusing to believe the earth goes
round the sun for 100 years slowed down advances in physics?

Not as much as simple minded people believing that it does...

Please don't post after 5 joints.

Bless.


--
Climate Change: Socialism wearing a lab coat.

On 22/04/2021 19:52, Tim Streater wrote:
On 22 Apr 2021 at 19:25:48 BST, "Commander Kinsey" wrote:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:32:42 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

On 21/04/2021 19:10, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Surely you must agree that people refusing to believe the earth goes
round the sun for 100 years slowed down advances in physics?

Not as much as simple minded people believing that it does...

Please don't post after 5 joints.

The Sun and the Earth orbit around their common centre of mass.

No, they both orbit the centre of mass of the universe...no they don't
do anything of the sort, its all an illusion.

The problem is that modern science is handicapped completely by still
living in a Newtonian world, when clearly its not like that at all.


--
Climate Change: Socialism wearing a lab coat.

On 22/04/2021 19:57, Chris Hogg wrote:
On 22 Apr 2021 18:52:41 GMT, Tim Streater
wrote:

On 22 Apr 2021 at 19:25:48 BST, "Commander Kinsey" wrote:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:32:42 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

On 21/04/2021 19:10, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Surely you must agree that people refusing to believe the earth goes
round the sun for 100 years slowed down advances in physics?

Not as much as simple minded people believing that it does...

Please don't post after 5 joints.

The Sun and the Earth orbit around their common centre of mass
which is within the Earth's radius and accounts for why there are two
tides per 24 hours, not just one.


What?
It's not even always within the *SUN'S* radius when you take Jupiter and
Saturn into account.

And that's nothing to do with why there are two tides a day, which are
dominated by the moons presence, not the suns...



--
Climate Change: Socialism wearing a lab coat.

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:33:46 +0100, The Natural Idiot, the troll-feeding
senile asshole, blathered:

Please don't post after 5 joints.

Bless.

Must have been a horrible time for you when you kept pretending to have
"killfiled" the two subnormal trolls, eh, Natural Idiot? LOL

% formulated the question :
On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made climate
change.
Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.
Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.
It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.
There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

If by "blow up" you mean enter the Red Giant phase. Our Sun is not
likely to explode.

On 2021-04-22 8:19 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 8:08:16 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

you're an organ grinder

Only to those who really deserve it, and then I outsource the work.

do you have a coin snatching monkey

On Apr 23, 2021 at 8:38:27 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 8:19 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 8:08:16 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go
extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

you're an organ grinder

Only to those who really deserve it, and then I outsource the work.

do you have a coin snatching monkey

That's what she said.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 2021-04-23 9:13 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 8:38:27 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 8:19 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 8:08:16 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go
extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

you're an organ grinder

Only to those who really deserve it, and then I outsource the work.

do you have a coin snatching monkey

That's what she said.

its what you should've asked her

On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:20:42 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:13 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 8:38:27 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 8:19 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 8:08:16 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change,
that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect
that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go
extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

you're an organ grinder

Only to those who really deserve it, and then I outsource the work.

do you have a coin snatching monkey

That's what she said.

its what you should've asked her

We asked each other.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On 2021-04-23 9:22 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:20:42 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:13 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 8:38:27 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 8:19 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 8:08:16 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change,
that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect
that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go
extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

you're an organ grinder

Only to those who really deserve it, and then I outsource the work.

do you have a coin snatching monkey

That's what she said.

its what you should've asked her

We asked each other.

that's very emotional

On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:38:36 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:22 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:20:42 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:13 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 8:38:27 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 8:19 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 8:08:16 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change,
that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It
wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating
about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial
hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect
that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to
be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when
the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go
extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass
extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

you're an organ grinder

Only to those who really deserve it, and then I outsource the work.

do you have a coin snatching monkey

That's what she said.

its what you should've asked her

We asked each other.

that's very emotional

It was touching.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:44:53 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:34:32 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:10:05 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 10:59:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote

Another account must be made so they don't get the last word in.
The
silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn". And
not even
in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is
awful
today".
Turns out the admin was a religious nutter.

Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for
using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case.

You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not
impeded
science.

Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split.

In English please.

The two have a history that is tied together.

I doubt it.

Its true anyway.

Religion did not help science.

Yes it did, if only because a lot of the professionally religious
had a lot time on their hands that allowed them to do science.

Just because some scientists were religious means nothing.

In earlier times it was in fact almost all of them.

If there had been no religion, those same people would still have become
scientists.

Nope, they wouldn't have been in religious institutions with
a lot of time on their hands as parasites on the community.

Mendel would have had to get off his lard arse and earn a living.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor...ife_and_career

Inventing things is a living.

He would have got the same food and accommodation
if he had just grovelled to some god or other instead
of doing something useful.

Einstein managed to earn money as a patent clerk, and invent ****.

On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:02:12 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 20, 2021 at 11:20:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:23:56 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 9:01:57 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote

What matters is the evidence with science, not individuals.

Correct: though the experts will generally side with the evidence
(if they did not they would not be the experts!)

Problem is that the evidence changes, particularly with the
recent less than predicted rate of world temperature change.

Do you mean the hand picked specific areas where it was less even as
the world beat the predictions?

Nope, the world as a whole didn=E2=80=99t beat predictions.

Would love to see the peer reviewed research you are referring to.

You're the one that needs to provide that
given you claim it exceeded predictions.

You have no research to back your claims, nor scientific sites. OK. That
is
what I figured.

You have no research

Countered by the evidence provided.

If you want to have a conversation, fine, but I am not interested in you
making insane claims you cannot back and then ignoring the fact evidence has
been provided. If you ACTUALLY want to learn about man-made global climate
change this is a good place to start:

http://climate.nasa.gov

A government website is the last place to go for facts.

Do you have a more reputable site to get info on man-made global climate
change? if so please share.

Looking out of my window.

On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:20:13 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 20, 2021 at 1:03:55 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 20, 2021 at 11:20:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:23:56 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 9:01:57 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote

What matters is the evidence with science, not
individuals.

Correct: though the experts will generally side with the
evidence
(if they did not they would not be the experts!)

Problem is that the evidence changes, particularly with the
recent less than predicted rate of world temperature
change.

Do you mean the hand picked specific areas where it was less
even as
the world beat the predictions?

Nope, the world as a whole didn=E2=80=99t beat predictions.

Would love to see the peer reviewed research you are referring
to.

You're the one that needs to provide that
given you claim it exceeded predictions.

You have no research to back your claims, nor scientific sites.
OK. That
is
what I figured.

You have no research

Countered by the evidence provided.

If you want to have a conversation, fine, but I am not interested in
you
making insane claims you cannot back and then ignoring the fact
evidence has
been provided. If you ACTUALLY want to learn about man-made global
climate
change this is a good place to start:

http://climate.nasa.gov

A government website is the last place to go for facts.

Do you have a more reputable site to get info on man-made global
climate
change? if so please share.

It isnt about reputable, its about the evidence presented with science.

Peer reviewed studies.

Reviewed by other MMCC cult members...

A cult, yes that's a good way of describing it. Or perhaps a religion. "This must be so, so let's find ways to "prove" it".

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 05:54:57 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 20, 2021 at 8:47:23 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind
"Snit" repetitively ****ted
the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when
its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is.

What you snipped:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again, I look to peer reviewed papers (and not just hand picking but a wide
range if I am interested in a topic), scientific sites, fact checkers, top
experts and organizations, etc.

You find this to be a bad thing and say that ties me to a cult. We do not see
eye-to-eye. So what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Sad your frustration at not being able to answer this question led you to lash
out so immaturely.

I hope you do better next time.

If you wanted to say god existed, you could come up with "evidence" for that too. Doesn't mean he exists.

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:05:23 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:

Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind
"Snit" repetitively ****ted
the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when
its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is.

Tedious, isn't he?

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:18:06 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:14:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 00:45:22 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:34:04 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:28:52 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Commander Kinsey wrote
Snit wrote

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

If you want to reduce abortions, which most conservatives claim to
want, there are known methods to do it. At least in American the
Republican party (the more conservative of the two) rejects every one of
these things. There "solution" is to deny women equal rights.

Abortion has nothing to do with equal rights.

Right. Denying people the right to one does.

Wrong, Nothing unequal about it.

Denying people equal rights ties into a conversation about equal rights.
Don't
think people should have abortions -- then don't have one. And, hey, I want
to
see there be fewer, so let's back policy which is known to reduce the
number.

WTF are you on about wanting to reduce the number? Are you saying women
shouldn't be allowed to have them?

Women should... but I would like to see the need be reduced.

So this is nothing to do with abortions then. It's to do with you wanting to brainwash women into behaving differently.

On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:51:58 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:02:12 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 20, 2021 at 11:20:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:23:56 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 9:01:57 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote

What matters is the evidence with science, not individuals.

Correct: though the experts will generally side with the evidence
(if they did not they would not be the experts!)

Problem is that the evidence changes, particularly with the
recent less than predicted rate of world temperature change.

Do you mean the hand picked specific areas where it was less even as
the world beat the predictions?

Nope, the world as a whole didn=E2=80=99t beat predictions.

Would love to see the peer reviewed research you are referring to.

You're the one that needs to provide that
given you claim it exceeded predictions.

You have no research to back your claims, nor scientific sites. OK. That
is
what I figured.

You have no research

Countered by the evidence provided.

If you want to have a conversation, fine, but I am not interested in you
making insane claims you cannot back and then ignoring the fact evidence
has
been provided. If you ACTUALLY want to learn about man-made global climate
change this is a good place to start:

http://climate.nasa.gov

A government website is the last place to go for facts.

Do you have a more reputable site to get info on man-made global climate
change? if so please share.

Looking out of my window.

A simple "no" would have done. You have an unsupported intuition.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:55:17 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:18:06 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:14:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 00:45:22 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:34:04 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:28:52 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Commander Kinsey wrote
Snit wrote

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

If you want to reduce abortions, which most conservatives claim to
want, there are known methods to do it. At least in American the
Republican party (the more conservative of the two) rejects every one of
these things. There "solution" is to deny women equal rights.

Abortion has nothing to do with equal rights.

Right. Denying people the right to one does.

Wrong, Nothing unequal about it.

Denying people equal rights ties into a conversation about equal rights.
Don't
think people should have abortions -- then don't have one. And, hey, I want
to
see there be fewer, so let's back policy which is known to reduce the
number.

WTF are you on about wanting to reduce the number? Are you saying women
shouldn't be allowed to have them?

Women should... but I would like to see the need be reduced.

So this is nothing to do with abortions then. It's to do with you wanting to
brainwash women into behaving differently.

It is about giving them tools, educators, and choice.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:54:38 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:05:23 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:

Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind
"Snit" repetitively ****ted
the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when
its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is.

Tedious, isn't he?

What Rod Speed ran from:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again, I look to peer reviewed papers (and not just hand picking but a wide
range if I am interested in a topic), scientific sites, fact checkers, top
experts and organizations, etc.

You find this to be a bad thing and say that ties me to a cult. We do not see
eye-to-eye. So what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I find it amusing how offended some are by that.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:54:25 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 05:54:57 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 20, 2021 at 8:47:23 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind
"Snit" repetitively ****ted
the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when
its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is.

What you snipped:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Again, I look to peer reviewed papers (and not just hand picking but a wide
range if I am interested in a topic), scientific sites, fact checkers, top
experts and organizations, etc.

You find this to be a bad thing and say that ties me to a cult. We do not
see
eye-to-eye. So what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Sad your frustration at not being able to answer this question led you to
lash
out so immaturely.

I hope you do better next time.

If you wanted to say god existed, you could come up with "evidence" for that
too.

Well, god does exist -- as a concept (or set of concepts).

Doesn't mean he exists.

Can you point to the peer reviewed papers that back the idea of a deity?
Scientific sites? Fact checkers?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:52:56 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 22:20:13 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 20, 2021 at 1:03:55 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 20, 2021 at 11:20:45 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:23:56 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 9:01:57 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote

What matters is the evidence with science, not
individuals.

Correct: though the experts will generally side with the
evidence
(if they did not they would not be the experts!)

Problem is that the evidence changes, particularly with the
recent less than predicted rate of world temperature
change.

Do you mean the hand picked specific areas where it was less
even as
the world beat the predictions?

Nope, the world as a whole didn=E2=80=99t beat predictions.

Would love to see the peer reviewed research you are referring
to.

You're the one that needs to provide that
given you claim it exceeded predictions.

You have no research to back your claims, nor scientific sites.
OK. That
is
what I figured.

You have no research

Countered by the evidence provided.

If you want to have a conversation, fine, but I am not interested in
you
making insane claims you cannot back and then ignoring the fact
evidence has
been provided. If you ACTUALLY want to learn about man-made global
climate
change this is a good place to start:

http://climate.nasa.gov

A government website is the last place to go for facts.

Do you have a more reputable site to get info on man-made global
climate
change? if so please share.

It isnt about reputable, its about the evidence presented with science.

Peer reviewed studies.

Reviewed by other MMCC cult members...

A cult, yes that's a good way of describing it. Or perhaps a religion.
"This must be so, so let's find ways to "prove" it".

If one can disprove a going top theory one gets lots of recognition in
science. Does not mean there is no friction to stop such, but overall look at
the famous scientists -- each and every one proposed new ways to see things.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 18:08:03 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:



It is about giving them tools, educators, and choice.

You just can't wait to suck the unwashed Scottish ****** off, time and
again, eh, senile ****? BG

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 18:10:51 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


If one can disprove a going

I disapprove of your sucking off the unwashed trolling ******'s unwashed
cock, time and again, **** the Git, you dedicated senile sucker of troll
cock!

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 18:07:36 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


A simple "no" would have done.

If YOU only could say "no" to the unwashed trolling ******'s cock, **** the
Git!

fOn Fri, 23 Apr 2021 18:08:55 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


What Rod Speed ran from:

What YOU run after, **** the Git: every unwashed troll's cock!

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 18:09:55 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


Can you point to the peer reviewed papers that back the idea of a deity?
Scientific sites? Fact checkers?

Well, he can troll you some more and make you suck him off some more! Wanna
bet, senile sucker of troll cock? BG

On 2021-04-23 10:40 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:38:36 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:22 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 9:20:42 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-23 9:13 a.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 23, 2021 at 8:38:27 AM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 8:19 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 8:08:16 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 7:40 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 7:30:58 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 6:03 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 6:00:02 PM MST, "%" wrote
:

On 2021-04-22 12:46 p.m., Snit wrote:
On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change,
that=E2=80=99s obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It
wasn=E2=80=99t that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating
about global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial
hike in atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect
that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to
be more CO2 in
the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when
the CO2 levels
were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go
extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass
extinction we are in.

one day our sun will blow up and all you know will be gone

I am working on travel plans before that.


you'll never get off the ground cause there won't be any

I'll grind it until it is ground.

you're an organ grinder

Only to those who really deserve it, and then I outsource the work.

do you have a coin snatching monkey

That's what she said.

its what you should've asked her

We asked each other.

that's very emotional

It was touching.

do you have a youtube of it we could make some money

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:44:53 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:34:32 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:10:05 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 10:59:28 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:15:17 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 15, 2021 at 11:02:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote

Another account must be made so they don't get the last word
in.
The
silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word "damn".
And
not even
in a rude way, probably something like "the damn weather is
awful
today".
Turns out the admin was a religious nutter.

Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter for
using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that case.

You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion had not
impeded
science.

Until a few hundred years ago there was not much of a split.

In English please.

The two have a history that is tied together.

I doubt it.

Its true anyway.

Religion did not help science.

Yes it did, if only because a lot of the professionally religious
had a lot time on their hands that allowed them to do science.

Just because some scientists were religious means nothing.

In earlier times it was in fact almost all of them.

If there had been no religion, those same people would still have
become
scientists.

Nope, they wouldn't have been in religious institutions with
a lot of time on their hands as parasites on the community.

Mendel would have had to get off his lard arse and earn a living.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor...ife_and_career

Inventing things is a living.

He would have got the same food and accommodation
if he had just grovelled to some god or other instead
of doing something useful.

Einstein managed to earn money as a patent clerk, and invent ****.

He didn't actually invent anything much when he was a patent
clerk and was stupid enough to believe in some god too.

"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:55:17 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:18:06 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 21, 2021 at 11:14:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 00:45:22 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:34:04 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 17, 2021 at 4:28:52 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Commander Kinsey wrote
Snit wrote

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

If you want to reduce abortions, which most conservatives
claim to
want, there are known methods to do it. At least in American
the
Republican party (the more conservative of the two) rejects
every one of
these things. There "solution" is to deny women equal rights.

Abortion has nothing to do with equal rights.

Right. Denying people the right to one does.

Wrong, Nothing unequal about it.

Denying people equal rights ties into a conversation about equal
rights.
Don't
think people should have abortions -- then don't have one. And, hey,
I want
to
see there be fewer, so let's back policy which is known to reduce
the
number.

WTF are you on about wanting to reduce the number? Are you saying
women
shouldn't be allowed to have them?

Women should... but I would like to see the need be reduced.

So this is nothing to do with abortions then. It's to do with you
wanting to
brainwash women into behaving differently.

It is about giving them tools, educators, and choice.

They already have all of that and choose to kill their unborn children.

"Snit" wrote in message
...
On Apr 23, 2021 at 10:54:38 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 06:05:23 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:

Some gutless ****wit troll desperately cowering behind
"Snit" repetitively ****ted
the same mindless troll**** and lies as it always does when
its got done like a ****ing dinner, as it always is.

Tedious, isn't he?

What Rod Speed ran from:

More of you lies, that troll**** is what I flushed, repeatedly.