Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,768
Default A Better Hinge

http://tacklemaker.info/index.php?ac...sa=view;pic=31
You shouldn't need to be logged on to see the image.

This is a pretty typical lead casting (sinkers, jigs, spinnerbaits, etc)
mold. The hinge shown works pretty darn well. It moves easily, and does a
good job of helping to hold the mold halves in alignment at the hinge end.
The opening (handle side) end has two alignment pins with radius ends that
mate the plates at that end. Over all my customers are atleast acceptably
happy with it. However to make a mold like this that finishes as to 1/2
inch (apx) plates with a hinge I start out by throwing away a third of the
raw material. Basically I start with 3/4 inch flat bar and remove 1/4 inch
to leave the 1/4" hinge bosses. It just irks me to throw away 33% of the
raw material on every one of these molds.

No. Bolting a flat metal hinge to the ends is NOT a better way. It simply
will not hold up over time, and even if its handled with kid gloves the heat
cycling will cause it to work loose. I've seen molds made by other mold
makers with tacked on hinges, and they get pretty beat up and very sloppy
over time. It often results in damage to the mold itself. Especially if
cores, pins, and other inserts or materials need to be placed in the mold
before casting. These one piece boss pinned hinges last through thousands
of heat cycles. I've done larger molds this same way that customers have
told me they have literally run tons of lead through. It would also require
another setup to drill and tap to tack on a sheet metal hinge.

Casting a billet with preformed mold bosses is not a great answer either.
The aluminum that results is more porous with the type of foundry I could
setup, and my quantity is to small to have them forged cost efficiently. I
think it might also drive up the per unit cost too much unless I could cast
or forge them in great quantities. On top of that castings or forgings then
have other machining that needs to be done to make them useable. One mold
company sells cast "blanks, but I absolutely hate to work with them because
the metal doesn't machine as nicely and the surfaces are more of a pain to
square up and also keep the hinges squared up with both haves coming out
aligned.

I did think of maybe using a third piece between the two plates with 4 pins
instead of the two I use now, but then it would not help as much with mold
alignment. It would also be slower and more cludgy for the customer to use
the mold. Every idea I come up with is also more manual work, or more
secondary setup work.

Maybe they way I am doing it is the best way to get a decent result within
my work constraints, but I can't help but wonder if there isn't a better
way.

Tangent:
If anybody is curious. No I do not use a round over mill to get the hinge
bosses. I tried that in the past and I was not happy with it at all. I cnc
mill a radius on the boss with a .001 depth of cut and then sand smooth when
it comes off the mold. It would be faster to use a round over mill, but
because of the lead on the cutting flutes and lack of consistency from one
to the next it would waste part of the useable surface of the mold plates.
Make larger mold blanks to make up for it then means slightly higher (few
cents per unit atleast) material cost and higher machine time clearing the
face of the blank. It works out to be a wash on that for cost and produces
a CNC cutting the radius gives better result in my opinion.




  #2   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,768
Default A Better Hinge

"Bob La Londe" wrote in message news
http://tacklemaker.info/index.php?ac...sa=view;pic=31
You shouldn't need to be logged on to see the image.

This is a pretty typical lead casting (sinkers, jigs, spinnerbaits, etc)
mold. The hinge shown works pretty darn well. It moves easily, and does a
good job of helping to hold the mold halves in alignment at the hinge end.
The opening (handle side) end has two alignment pins with radius ends that
mate the plates at that end. Over all my customers are atleast acceptably
happy with it. However to make a mold like this that finishes as to 1/2
inch (apx) plates with a hinge I start out by throwing away a third of the
raw material. Basically I start with 3/4 inch flat bar and remove 1/4 inch
to leave the 1/4" hinge bosses. It just irks me to throw away 33% of the
raw material on every one of these molds.

No. Bolting a flat metal hinge to the ends is NOT a better way. It simply
will not hold up over time, and even if its handled with kid gloves the heat
cycling will cause it to work loose. I've seen molds made by other mold
makers with tacked on hinges, and they get pretty beat up and very sloppy
over time. It often results in damage to the mold itself. Especially if
cores, pins, and other inserts or materials need to be placed in the mold
before casting. These one piece boss pinned hinges last through thousands
of heat cycles. I've done larger molds this same way that customers have
told me they have literally run tons of lead through. It would also require
another setup to drill and tap to tack on a sheet metal hinge.

Casting a billet with preformed mold bosses is not a great answer either.
The aluminum that results is more porous with the type of foundry I could
setup, and my quantity is to small to have them forged cost efficiently. I
think it might also drive up the per unit cost too much unless I could cast
or forge them in great quantities. On top of that castings or forgings then
have other machining that needs to be done to make them useable. One mold
company sells cast "blanks, but I absolutely hate to work with them because
the metal doesn't machine as nicely and the surfaces are more of a pain to
square up and also keep the hinges squared up with both haves coming out
aligned.

I did think of maybe using a third piece between the two plates with 4 pins
instead of the two I use now, but then it would not help as much with mold
alignment. It would also be slower and more cludgy for the customer to use
the mold. Every idea I come up with is also more manual work, or more
secondary setup work.

Maybe they way I am doing it is the best way to get a decent result within
my work constraints, but I can't help but wonder if there isn't a better
way.

Tangent:
If anybody is curious. No I do not use a round over mill to get the hinge
bosses. I tried that in the past and I was not happy with it at all. I cnc
mill a radius on the boss with a .001 depth of cut and then sand smooth when
it comes off the mold. It would be faster to use a round over mill, but
because of the lead on the cutting flutes and lack of consistency from one
to the next it would waste part of the useable surface of the mold plates.
Make larger mold blanks to make up for it then means slightly higher (few
cents per unit atleast) material cost and higher machine time clearing the
face of the blank. It works out to be a wash on that for cost and produces
a CNC cutting the radius gives better result in my opinion.


***************
I sure need to remember to proof read before I hit send.

  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,104
Default A Better Hinge

On Friday, July 21, 2017 at 5:59:05 PM UTC-4, Bob La Londe wrote:
http://tacklemaker.info/index.php?ac...sa=view;pic=31
You shouldn't need to be logged on to see the image.

This is a pretty typical lead casting (sinkers, jigs, spinnerbaits, etc)
mold. The hinge shown works pretty darn well. It moves easily, and does a
good job of helping to hold the mold halves in alignment at the hinge end.
The opening (handle side) end has two alignment pins with radius ends that
mate the plates at that end. Over all my customers are atleast acceptably
happy with it. However to make a mold like this that finishes as to 1/2
inch (apx) plates with a hinge I start out by throwing away a third of the
raw material. Basically I start with 3/4 inch flat bar and remove 1/4 inch
to leave the 1/4" hinge bosses. It just irks me to throw away 33% of the
raw material on every one of these molds.

No. Bolting a flat metal hinge to the ends is NOT a better way. It simply
will not hold up over time, and even if its handled with kid gloves the heat
cycling will cause it to work loose. I've seen molds made by other mold
makers with tacked on hinges, and they get pretty beat up and very sloppy
over time. It often results in damage to the mold itself. Especially if
cores, pins, and other inserts or materials need to be placed in the mold
before casting. These one piece boss pinned hinges last through thousands
of heat cycles. I've done larger molds this same way that customers have
told me they have literally run tons of lead through. It would also require
another setup to drill and tap to tack on a sheet metal hinge.

Casting a billet with preformed mold bosses is not a great answer either.
The aluminum that results is more porous with the type of foundry I could
setup, and my quantity is to small to have them forged cost efficiently. I
think it might also drive up the per unit cost too much unless I could cast
or forge them in great quantities. On top of that castings or forgings then
have other machining that needs to be done to make them useable. One mold
company sells cast "blanks, but I absolutely hate to work with them because
the metal doesn't machine as nicely and the surfaces are more of a pain to
square up and also keep the hinges squared up with both haves coming out
aligned.

I did think of maybe using a third piece between the two plates with 4 pins
instead of the two I use now, but then it would not help as much with mold
alignment. It would also be slower and more cludgy for the customer to use
the mold. Every idea I come up with is also more manual work, or more
secondary setup work.

Maybe they way I am doing it is the best way to get a decent result within
my work constraints, but I can't help but wonder if there isn't a better
way.

Tangent:
If anybody is curious. No I do not use a round over mill to get the hinge
bosses. I tried that in the past and I was not happy with it at all. I cnc
mill a radius on the boss with a .001 depth of cut and then sand smooth when
it comes off the mold. It would be faster to use a round over mill, but
because of the lead on the cutting flutes and lack of consistency from one
to the next it would waste part of the useable surface of the mold plates.
Make larger mold blanks to make up for it then means slightly higher (few
cents per unit atleast) material cost and higher machine time clearing the
face of the blank. It works out to be a wash on that for cost and produces
a CNC cutting the radius gives better result in my opinion.


Why not make the mold bosses separately, and have them drop into pockets in the mold, then get pinned or bolted in place? You could make them rectangular to keep them in alignment. Much like a mortise & tenon.
  #4   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 247
Default A Better Hinge

On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 14:58:58 -0700, "Bob La Londe"
wrote:

Basically I start with 3/4 inch flat bar and remove 1/4 inch
to leave the 1/4" hinge bosses. It just irks me to throw away 33% of the
raw material on every one of these molds.


Unequal leg angle or a custom extrusion are the two thoughts that
come to mind.
--
William
  #5   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,705
Default A Better Hinge

Bob La Londe wrote:
http://tacklemaker.info/index.php?ac...sa=view;pic=31
You shouldn't need to be logged on to see the image.

This is a pretty typical lead casting (sinkers, jigs, spinnerbaits, etc)
mold. The hinge shown works pretty darn well. It moves easily, and does a
good job of helping to hold the mold halves in alignment at the hinge end.
The opening (handle side) end has two alignment pins with radius ends that
mate the plates at that end. Over all my customers are atleast acceptably
happy with it. However to make a mold like this that finishes as to 1/2
inch (apx) plates with a hinge I start out by throwing away a third of the
raw material. Basically I start with 3/4 inch flat bar and remove 1/4 inch
to leave the 1/4" hinge bosses. It just irks me to throw away 33% of the
raw material on every one of these molds.

No. Bolting a flat metal hinge to the ends is NOT a better way. It simply
will not hold up over time, and even if its handled with kid gloves the heat
cycling will cause it to work loose. I've seen molds made by other mold
makers with tacked on hinges, and they get pretty beat up and very sloppy
over time. It often results in damage to the mold itself. Especially if
cores, pins, and other inserts or materials need to be placed in the mold
before casting. These one piece boss pinned hinges last through thousands
of heat cycles. I've done larger molds this same way that customers have
told me they have literally run tons of lead through. It would also require
another setup to drill and tap to tack on a sheet metal hinge.

Casting a billet with preformed mold bosses is not a great answer either.
The aluminum that results is more porous with the type of foundry I could
setup, and my quantity is to small to have them forged cost efficiently. I
think it might also drive up the per unit cost too much unless I could cast
or forge them in great quantities. On top of that castings or forgings then
have other machining that needs to be done to make them useable. One mold
company sells cast "blanks, but I absolutely hate to work with them because
the metal doesn't machine as nicely and the surfaces are more of a pain to
square up and also keep the hinges squared up with both haves coming out
aligned.

I did think of maybe using a third piece between the two plates with 4 pins
instead of the two I use now, but then it would not help as much with mold
alignment. It would also be slower and more cludgy for the customer to use
the mold. Every idea I come up with is also more manual work, or more
secondary setup work.

Maybe they way I am doing it is the best way to get a decent result within
my work constraints, but I can't help but wonder if there isn't a better
way.

Tangent:
If anybody is curious. No I do not use a round over mill to get the hinge
bosses. I tried that in the past and I was not happy with it at all. I cnc
mill a radius on the boss with a .001 depth of cut and then sand smooth when
it comes off the mold. It would be faster to use a round over mill, but
because of the lead on the cutting flutes and lack of consistency from one
to the next it would waste part of the useable surface of the mold plates.
Make larger mold blanks to make up for it then means slightly higher (few
cents per unit atleast) material cost and higher machine time clearing the
face of the blank. It works out to be a wash on that for cost and produces
a CNC cutting the radius gives better result in my opinion.


How about machining the ends to use something like size 50 motorcycle
chain. Basically a pivot on each half. Then machine in 2 more alignment
pins to ensure proper closure. That would allow you to start with 1/2".
Sort of how hinged hand cuffs work.


--
Steve W.


  #6   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,888
Default A Better Hinge

"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
news
http://tacklemaker.info/index.php?ac...sa=view;pic=31
You shouldn't need to be logged on to see the image.


How does MIG welding a thicker bar on the end compare in cost and
effort?

You could mill steps for the beads in the end to retain strength and
minimize cleanup.


  #7   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,768
Default A Better Hinge

"William Bagwell" wrote in message
...

On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 14:58:58 -0700, "Bob La Londe"
wrote:

Basically I start with 3/4 inch flat bar and remove 1/4 inch
to leave the 1/4" hinge bosses. It just irks me to throw away 33% of the
raw material on every one of these molds.


Unequal leg angle or a custom extrusion are the two thoughts that
come to mind.
--
William

I may not go this way, but those are both ideas I had not thought of.
Unequal leg angle would be very good if I could find the right one. Think
they make one that's 1x6x1/2? Suitable unequal leg angle would probably
have to be your second idea. A custom extrusion. Maybe a couple of them.
If my work volume gets that high I might consider something like that.


  #8   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,768
Default A Better Hinge

"Steve W." wrote in message news
Bob La Londe wrote:
http://tacklemaker.info/index.php?ac...sa=view;pic=31
You shouldn't need to be logged on to see the image.

This is a pretty typical lead casting (sinkers, jigs, spinnerbaits, etc)
mold. The hinge shown works pretty darn well. It moves easily, and does
a good job of helping to hold the mold halves in alignment at the hinge
end. The opening (handle side) end has two alignment pins with radius ends
that mate the plates at that end. Over all my customers are atleast
acceptably happy with it. However to make a mold like this that finishes
as to 1/2 inch (apx) plates with a hinge I start out by throwing away a
third of the raw material. Basically I start with 3/4 inch flat bar and
remove 1/4 inch to leave the 1/4" hinge bosses. It just irks me to throw
away 33% of the raw material on every one of these molds.

No. Bolting a flat metal hinge to the ends is NOT a better way. It
simply will not hold up over time, and even if its handled with kid gloves
the heat cycling will cause it to work loose. I've seen molds made by
other mold makers with tacked on hinges, and they get pretty beat up and
very sloppy over time. It often results in damage to the mold itself.
Especially if cores, pins, and other inserts or materials need to be
placed in the mold before casting. These one piece boss pinned hinges
last through thousands of heat cycles. I've done larger molds this same
way that customers have told me they have literally run tons of lead
through. It would also require another setup to drill and tap to tack on
a sheet metal hinge.

Casting a billet with preformed mold bosses is not a great answer either.
The aluminum that results is more porous with the type of foundry I could
setup, and my quantity is to small to have them forged cost efficiently.
I think it might also drive up the per unit cost too much unless I could
cast or forge them in great quantities. On top of that castings or
forgings then have other machining that needs to be done to make them
useable. One mold company sells cast "blanks, but I absolutely hate to
work with them because the metal doesn't machine as nicely and the
surfaces are more of a pain to square up and also keep the hinges squared
up with both haves coming out aligned.

I did think of maybe using a third piece between the two plates with 4
pins instead of the two I use now, but then it would not help as much with
mold alignment. It would also be slower and more cludgy for the customer
to use the mold. Every idea I come up with is also more manual work, or
more secondary setup work.

Maybe they way I am doing it is the best way to get a decent result within
my work constraints, but I can't help but wonder if there isn't a better
way.

Tangent:
If anybody is curious. No I do not use a round over mill to get the hinge
bosses. I tried that in the past and I was not happy with it at all. I
cnc mill a radius on the boss with a .001 depth of cut and then sand
smooth when it comes off the mold. It would be faster to use a round over
mill, but because of the lead on the cutting flutes and lack of
consistency from one to the next it would waste part of the useable
surface of the mold plates. Make larger mold blanks to make up for it then
means slightly higher (few cents per unit atleast) material cost and
higher machine time clearing the face of the blank. It works out to be a
wash on that for cost and produces a CNC cutting the radius gives better
result in my opinion.


How about machining the ends to use something like size 50 motorcycle
chain. Basically a pivot on each half. Then machine in 2 more alignment
pins to ensure proper closure. That would allow you to start with 1/2".
Sort of how hinged hand cuffs work.

************

Yeah Steve I have considered a connecting link type design. I'm not
convinced its equal or better, but it would definitely reduce wasted raw
stock. Its a good idea.



  #9   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,768
Default A Better Hinge


"Jim Wilkins" wrote in message news
"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
news
http://tacklemaker.info/index.php?ac...sa=view;pic=31
You shouldn't need to be logged on to see the image.


How does MIG welding a thicker bar on the end compare in cost and
effort?

You could mill steps for the beads in the end to retain strength and
minimize cleanup.
********

I hadn't thought of that. I do have a MIG with a spool gun for welding
aluminum. I'm not very good, but I expect for a repetitive weld I could
setup, make a couple practice passes, and then do several at a time. I'm
not sure that overall its the best solution for me, but it is a good idea.

P.S. When I was learning to make molds, I had my first ultralight CNC mill,
and stock was more precious to me since I wasn't making any money with it I
often welded up mistakes in a plate and remachined it.


  #10   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,705
Default A Better Hinge

Bob La Londe wrote:
"Steve W." wrote in message news

How about machining the ends to use something like size 50 motorcycle
chain. Basically a pivot on each half. Then machine in 2 more alignment
pins to ensure proper closure. That would allow you to start with 1/2".
Sort of how hinged hand cuffs work.

************

Yeah Steve I have considered a connecting link type design. I'm not
convinced its equal or better, but it would definitely reduce wasted raw
stock. It’s a good idea.


Machine one up and beat it to death in testing.

--
Steve W.


  #11   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,768
Default A Better Hinge

"rangerssuck" wrote in message
...

On Friday, July 21, 2017 at 5:59:05 PM UTC-4, Bob La Londe wrote:
http://tacklemaker.info/index.php?ac...sa=view;pic=31
You shouldn't need to be logged on to see the image.

This is a pretty typical lead casting (sinkers, jigs, spinnerbaits, etc)
mold. The hinge shown works pretty darn well. It moves easily, and does
a
good job of helping to hold the mold halves in alignment at the hinge end.
The opening (handle side) end has two alignment pins with radius ends that
mate the plates at that end. Over all my customers are atleast acceptably
happy with it. However to make a mold like this that finishes as to 1/2
inch (apx) plates with a hinge I start out by throwing away a third of the
raw material. Basically I start with 3/4 inch flat bar and remove 1/4
inch
to leave the 1/4" hinge bosses. It just irks me to throw away 33% of the
raw material on every one of these molds.

No. Bolting a flat metal hinge to the ends is NOT a better way. It
simply
will not hold up over time, and even if its handled with kid gloves the
heat
cycling will cause it to work loose. I've seen molds made by other mold
makers with tacked on hinges, and they get pretty beat up and very sloppy
over time. It often results in damage to the mold itself. Especially if
cores, pins, and other inserts or materials need to be placed in the mold
before casting. These one piece boss pinned hinges last through thousands
of heat cycles. I've done larger molds this same way that customers have
told me they have literally run tons of lead through. It would also
require
another setup to drill and tap to tack on a sheet metal hinge.

Casting a billet with preformed mold bosses is not a great answer either.
The aluminum that results is more porous with the type of foundry I could
setup, and my quantity is to small to have them forged cost efficiently.
I
think it might also drive up the per unit cost too much unless I could
cast
or forge them in great quantities. On top of that castings or forgings
then
have other machining that needs to be done to make them useable. One mold
company sells cast "blanks, but I absolutely hate to work with them
because
the metal doesn't machine as nicely and the surfaces are more of a pain to
square up and also keep the hinges squared up with both haves coming out
aligned.

I did think of maybe using a third piece between the two plates with 4
pins
instead of the two I use now, but then it would not help as much with mold
alignment. It would also be slower and more cludgy for the customer to
use
the mold. Every idea I come up with is also more manual work, or more
secondary setup work.

Maybe they way I am doing it is the best way to get a decent result within
my work constraints, but I can't help but wonder if there isn't a better
way.

Tangent:
If anybody is curious. No I do not use a round over mill to get the hinge
bosses. I tried that in the past and I was not happy with it at all. I
cnc
mill a radius on the boss with a .001 depth of cut and then sand smooth
when
it comes off the mold. It would be faster to use a round over mill, but
because of the lead on the cutting flutes and lack of consistency from one
to the next it would waste part of the useable surface of the mold plates.
Make larger mold blanks to make up for it then means slightly higher (few
cents per unit atleast) material cost and higher machine time clearing the
face of the blank. It works out to be a wash on that for cost and
produces
a CNC cutting the radius gives better result in my opinion.


Why not make the mold bosses separately, and have them drop into pockets in
the mold, then get pinned or bolted in place? You could make them
rectangular to keep them in alignment. Much like a mortise & tenon.

************
That is a possible consideration. It deserves atleast weighing the extra
operation time vs the time saved roughing off stock and the better cost
efficiency on material. A press fit dovetail with a locking screw might
make for quick assembly. If I do a really good job it might even eliminate
one of my other secondary operations. Another good idea to think about.




  #12   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,888
Default A Better Hinge

"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
news

"Jim Wilkins" wrote in message news
"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
news
http://tacklemaker.info/index.php?ac...sa=view;pic=31
You shouldn't need to be logged on to see the image.


How does MIG welding a thicker bar on the end compare in cost and
effort?

You could mill steps for the beads in the end to retain strength and
minimize cleanup.
********

I hadn't thought of that. I do have a MIG with a spool gun for
welding aluminum. I'm not very good, but I expect for a repetitive
weld I could setup, make a couple practice passes, and then do
several at a time. I'm not sure that overall it's the best solution
for me, but it is a good idea.

P.S. When I was learning to make molds, I had my first ultralight
CNC mill, and stock was more precious to me since I wasn't making
any money with it I often welded up mistakes in a plate and
remachined it.


Personally I'd sub that job to a certified welder friend who is much
better than I'll ever be, and ask him how he wanted the parts prepared
so that the beads stay below the upper and lower surfaces.

I am better on steel and build up shapes like bending brake hinge
forks that would require removing a lot of metal from a solid block.

-jsw


  #13   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,768
Default A Better Hinge

"Jim Wilkins" wrote in message news
"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
news

"Jim Wilkins" wrote in message news
"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
news
http://tacklemaker.info/index.php?ac...sa=view;pic=31
You shouldn't need to be logged on to see the image.


How does MIG welding a thicker bar on the end compare in cost and
effort?

You could mill steps for the beads in the end to retain strength and
minimize cleanup.
********

I hadn't thought of that. I do have a MIG with a spool gun for welding
aluminum. I'm not very good, but I expect for a repetitive weld I could
setup, make a couple practice passes, and then do several at a time. I'm
not sure that overall it's the best solution for me, but it is a good
idea.

P.S. When I was learning to make molds, I had my first ultralight CNC
mill, and stock was more precious to me since I wasn't making any money
with it I often welded up mistakes in a plate and remachined it.


Personally I'd sub that job to a certified welder friend who is much
better than I'll ever be, and ask him how he wanted the parts prepared
so that the beads stay below the upper and lower surfaces.

*********

Now that's something I won't do. I used to just try to take certain types
of welding jobs over to the professional shops and leave it. I'd ask how
long, and that's when I'd come back to pick it up. I would never bother
them in between. The job was never ever done when they said. Not one time.
Usually I was told 2 more weeks several times (after an intitial 3-6 week
time window) before they finally did the job The last two times it was done
wrong. I just quit. Sure I get that Mr big farm owner or Mr government
contractor is a more important customer. I knew that up front that's why I
just asked how long and left. Its why I ultimately bought a decent dual gun
MIG welder and learned to weld aluminum in the first place. No point in
taking paying work to them if I can't get it done. I'm not good, but my
welds don't break either and ultimately they get done when I want them done.
Had nothing to do with money. I spent a lot on the welder. I took a lot of
years to pay it off. I'd have rather just had somebody do it and not worry
about it. Its why I work on a lot of my own stuff.









  #14   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default A Better Hinge

On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 15:57:07 -0700, "Bob La Londe"
wrote:

"Jim Wilkins" wrote in message news
"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
news

"Jim Wilkins" wrote in message news
"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
news
http://tacklemaker.info/index.php?ac...sa=view;pic=31
You shouldn't need to be logged on to see the image.


How does MIG welding a thicker bar on the end compare in cost and
effort?

You could mill steps for the beads in the end to retain strength and
minimize cleanup.
********

I hadn't thought of that. I do have a MIG with a spool gun for welding
aluminum. I'm not very good, but I expect for a repetitive weld I could
setup, make a couple practice passes, and then do several at a time. I'm
not sure that overall it's the best solution for me, but it is a good
idea.

P.S. When I was learning to make molds, I had my first ultralight CNC
mill, and stock was more precious to me since I wasn't making any money
with it I often welded up mistakes in a plate and remachined it.


Personally I'd sub that job to a certified welder friend who is much
better than I'll ever be, and ask him how he wanted the parts prepared
so that the beads stay below the upper and lower surfaces.

*********

Now that's something I won't do. I used to just try to take certain types
of welding jobs over to the professional shops and leave it. I'd ask how
long, and that's when I'd come back to pick it up. I would never bother
them in between. The job was never ever done when they said. Not one time.
Usually I was told 2 more weeks several times (after an intitial 3-6 week
time window) before they finally did the job The last two times it was done
wrong. I just quit. Sure I get that Mr big farm owner or Mr government
contractor is a more important customer. I knew that up front that's why I
just asked how long and left. Its why I ultimately bought a decent dual gun
MIG welder and learned to weld aluminum in the first place. No point in
taking paying work to them if I can't get it done. I'm not good, but my
welds don't break either and ultimately they get done when I want them done.
Had nothing to do with money. I spent a lot on the welder. I took a lot of
years to pay it off. I'd have rather just had somebody do it and not worry
about it. Its why I work on a lot of my own stuff.

I don't know if it is worth the bother but you might want to look at
Lyman bullet molds. The hinge is in the handles and the mold is simply
two blocks aligned with pins.
see https://tinyurl.com/yamk6h5f
--
Cheers,

John B.
  #15   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,768
Default A Better Hinge


"Jon B. Slocomb" wrote in message
...

On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 15:57:07 -0700, "Bob La Londe"
wrote:

"Jim Wilkins" wrote in message news
"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
news

"Jim Wilkins" wrote in message news
"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
news
http://tacklemaker.info/index.php?ac...sa=view;pic=31
You shouldn't need to be logged on to see the image.


How does MIG welding a thicker bar on the end compare in cost and
effort?

You could mill steps for the beads in the end to retain strength and
minimize cleanup.
********

I hadn't thought of that. I do have a MIG with a spool gun for welding
aluminum. I'm not very good, but I expect for a repetitive weld I could
setup, make a couple practice passes, and then do several at a time. I'm
not sure that overall it's the best solution for me, but it is a good
idea.

P.S. When I was learning to make molds, I had my first ultralight CNC
mill, and stock was more precious to me since I wasn't making any money
with it I often welded up mistakes in a plate and remachined it.


Personally I'd sub that job to a certified welder friend who is much
better than I'll ever be, and ask him how he wanted the parts prepared
so that the beads stay below the upper and lower surfaces.

*********

Now that's something I won't do. I used to just try to take certain types
of welding jobs over to the professional shops and leave it. I'd ask how
long, and that's when I'd come back to pick it up. I would never bother
them in between. The job was never ever done when they said. Not one
time.
Usually I was told 2 more weeks several times (after an intitial 3-6 week
time window) before they finally did the job The last two times it was
done
wrong. I just quit. Sure I get that Mr big farm owner or Mr government
contractor is a more important customer. I knew that up front that's why I
just asked how long and left. Its why I ultimately bought a decent dual
gun
MIG welder and learned to weld aluminum in the first place. No point in
taking paying work to them if I can't get it done. I'm not good, but my
welds don't break either and ultimately they get done when I want them
done.
Had nothing to do with money. I spent a lot on the welder. I took a lot
of
years to pay it off. I'd have rather just had somebody do it and not worry
about it. Its why I work on a lot of my own stuff.

I don't know if it is worth the bother but you might want to look at
Lyman bullet molds. The hinge is in the handles and the mold is simply
two blocks aligned with pins.
see https://tinyurl.com/yamk6h5f

*************

Thats a decent idea John. I actually have some Lyman and Lee stuff, and
atleast on paper I am a dealer for Lee Precision. Unfortunately those molds
do not open far enough to load hooks, pins, screws locks, wire forms, etc,
easily. Its definitely a good form for bullet molds and allows a home
boo-lit caster to own several molds and only one set of handles. Thanks for
the thought John.






  #16   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,017
Default A Better Hinge

On Friday, July 21, 2017 at 2:59:05 PM UTC-7, Bob La Londe wrote:

This is a pretty typical lead casting (sinkers, jigs, spinnerbaits, etc)
mold. The hinge shown works pretty darn well. It moves easily, and does a
good job of helping to hold the mold halves in alignment at the hinge end.
The opening (handle side) end has two alignment pins with radius ends


There's some options with extra parts (mainly, though, I don't like loose
parts...). In particular, your alignment pins could go through the
mold and a wedge can snug the halves together. On a lathe, it's
only gonna take a bit of a head on the protruding pin end, that engages
an external wedge of the sloped-metal-with-keyhole type.

With a CNC setup, the wedge can be simpler, if you slot the pin, but
that might eventually score the mold. Internal wedge (like for Morse taper
release) also needs a radius'ed edge;
  #17   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 29
Default A Better Hinge

On Friday, July 21, 2017 at 2:59:05 PM UTC-7, Bob La Londe wrote:

This is a pretty typical lead casting (sinkers, jigs, spinnerbaits, etc)
mold. The hinge shown works pretty darn well. It moves easily, and does
a
good job of helping to hold the mold halves in alignment at the hinge end.
The opening (handle side) end has two alignment pins with radius ends


Just to go further outside the box, if you have a hydraulic press you could
bend a short L on the end of your bar to give you the raised material for
your hinge. You'll get some distortion between the edge of the die and the
bend so you will have to make your mold maybe 1/2" or 3/4" longer than
before. Either keep the radius large to prevent cracking or set up a torch
(or crab pot propane burner) and firebrick oven with a slot just big enough
to stick in the end you are about to bend and experiment with how hot you
need. The $30 harborfreight IR thermometer (frequently on sale or coupon
for $20) goes to 968F for easy measurement. Most cheap ones don't go nearly
that high. Not sure what the emissivity of aluminum is up there so you need
to calibrate if you want actual accuracy but reproducibility should be good
and you will just keep trying an indicated 25F higher each time until you
get a good bend so who cares :-). Definitely want a real press brake or air
over hydraulic for speed, then quench in water immediately after bending.
I've done the heat and bend but never bothered with this but if you want
maximum strength you could age at 400F for an hour to get the region you
heated somewhere near T5 while the rest should still be pretty much T6.

--
Regards,
Carl Ijames


  #18   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,768
Default A Better Hinge

"Carl Ijames" wrote in message news
On Friday, July 21, 2017 at 2:59:05 PM UTC-7, Bob La Londe wrote:

This is a pretty typical lead casting (sinkers, jigs, spinnerbaits, etc)
mold. The hinge shown works pretty darn well. It moves easily, and does
a
good job of helping to hold the mold halves in alignment at the hinge end.
The opening (handle side) end has two alignment pins with radius ends


Just to go further outside the box, if you have a hydraulic press you could
bend a short L on the end of your bar to give you the raised material for
your hinge. You'll get some distortion between the edge of the die and the
bend so you will have to make your mold maybe 1/2" or 3/4" longer than
before. Either keep the radius large to prevent cracking or set up a torch
(or crab pot propane burner) and firebrick oven with a slot just big enough
to stick in the end you are about to bend and experiment with how hot you
need. The $30 harborfreight IR thermometer (frequently on sale or coupon
for $20) goes to 968F for easy measurement. Most cheap ones don't go nearly
that high. Not sure what the emissivity of aluminum is up there so you need
to calibrate if you want actual accuracy but reproducibility should be good
and you will just keep trying an indicated 25F higher each time until you
get a good bend so who cares :-). Definitely want a real press brake or air
over hydraulic for speed, then quench in water immediately after bending.
I've done the heat and bend but never bothered with this but if you want
maximum strength you could age at 400F for an hour to get the region you
heated somewhere near T5 while the rest should still be pretty much T6.

--
Regards,
Carl Ijames

**************
Yer jacking with me right? (pun intended)


  #19   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 56
Default A Better Hinge

On 7/21/2017 5:58 PM, Bob La Londe wrote:
http://tacklemaker.info/index.php?ac...sa=view;pic=31
You shouldn't need to be logged on to see the image.

This is a pretty typical lead casting (sinkers, jigs, spinnerbaits, etc)
mold. The hinge shown works pretty darn well. It moves easily, and
does a good job of helping to hold the mold halves in alignment at the
hinge end. The opening (handle side) end has two alignment pins with
radius ends that mate the plates at that end. Over all my customers are
atleast acceptably happy with it. However to make a mold like this that
finishes as to 1/2 inch (apx) plates with a hinge I start out by
throwing away a third of the raw material. Basically I start with 3/4
inch flat bar and remove 1/4 inch to leave the 1/4" hinge bosses. It
just irks me to throw away 33% of the raw material on every one of these
molds.

No. Bolting a flat metal hinge to the ends is NOT a better way. It
simply will not hold up over time, and even if its handled with kid
gloves the heat cycling will cause it to work loose. I've seen molds
made by other mold makers with tacked on hinges, and they get pretty
beat up and very sloppy over time. It often results in damage to the
mold itself. Especially if cores, pins, and other inserts or materials
need to be placed in the mold before casting. These one piece boss
pinned hinges last through thousands of heat cycles. I've done larger
molds this same way that customers have told me they have literally run
tons of lead through. It would also require another setup to drill and
tap to tack on a sheet metal hinge.

Casting a billet with preformed mold bosses is not a great answer
either. The aluminum that results is more porous with the type of
foundry I could setup, and my quantity is to small to have them forged
cost efficiently. I think it might also drive up the per unit cost too
much unless I could cast or forge them in great quantities. On top of
that castings or forgings then have other machining that needs to be
done to make them useable. One mold company sells cast "blanks, but I
absolutely hate to work with them because the metal doesn't machine as
nicely and the surfaces are more of a pain to square up and also keep
the hinges squared up with both haves coming out aligned.

I did think of maybe using a third piece between the two plates with 4
pins instead of the two I use now, but then it would not help as much
with mold alignment. It would also be slower and more cludgy for the
customer to use the mold. Every idea I come up with is also more manual
work, or more secondary setup work.

Maybe they way I am doing it is the best way to get a decent result
within my work constraints, but I can't help but wonder if there isn't a
better way.

Tangent:
If anybody is curious. No I do not use a round over mill to get the
hinge bosses. I tried that in the past and I was not happy with it at
all. I cnc mill a radius on the boss with a .001 depth of cut and then
sand smooth when it comes off the mold. It would be faster to use a
round over mill, but because of the lead on the cutting flutes and lack
of consistency from one to the next it would waste part of the useable
surface of the mold plates. Make larger mold blanks to make up for it
then means slightly higher (few cents per unit atleast) material cost
and higher machine time clearing the face of the blank. It works out to
be a wash on that for cost and produces a CNC cutting the radius gives
better result in my opinion.





---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

Build the hinge separately, then dowel and bolt it to the ends of the
mold halves.
  #20   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,163
Default A Better Hinge

On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:04:41 -0700, "Bob La Londe"
wrote:

SNIP
Greetings Bob,
I'm curious about your description of the faults of round over
cutters. I use some HSS ones but for steel I use mostly carbide
cutters. In fact, I use carbide cutters almost exclusively now. I have
old HSS ones in many sizes and only use them when I don't have a
carbide one. If I have to do a lot of milling I buy another carbide
one if all I have is the HSS version. But even the HSS ones cut
accurate radii. As far as neding extra mayerial all the cutters I use
would be able to mill the bosses as shown. I also have and use cutters
that can mill the bosses in one pass but you would need to stand the
molds up which would require another setup. One of the reasons I like
the carbide cutters is that they are ground with a finer finish so the
parts look better. I also sometimes use carbide router bits meant for
wood to machine metal, even stainless steels. They typically have a
pretty rough grind on them which leaves a poor finish on the parts. To
correct this I make a brass lap, charge it with diamond paste, and lap
the router bit cutting edges to a much finer finish. This process
doesn't take long. Carbide router bits have saved my butt a few times
when I have forgotten to order a cutter or when a cutter fails for
some reason. Living on an island makes getting cutters in a hurry
tough.
Eric

**********************
I have only purchased a few round over mills, but they all have all seem to
have a slight angled lead to the radius area. Also, I haven't found a
standard for the overall geometry and dimensions for the rest of the cutter
that I can use to program the cut. I use them all the time to rough radius
the end of alignment pins on the lathe, but on the mill I would only use
them on outside edges. The inside edge needs a clearance cut on those I
have in order to cut the radius. I did that before, but I only over did
them on the manual mill to finish after the mold was complete. I never
cared for it. That was time I WAS NOT spending doing design and setup work.

The other issue I have is power and speed. The round over mills really are
not IMO well suited for high speed milling. I can't low speed mill on the
24K high high speed spindles. They really have about zero torque under 10K.

Oh, yes. I have used router bits in a pinch many times. Since I also have
a small CNC router I do have a decent selection of router bits on hand at
any given time.

Bob-you can run a .375 dia. carbide round over bit at 20,000 RPM on
aluminum. The carbide bits I use have a lead into the radius but the
complete 90 degrees of curve is there. They have a different grind
than the HSS ones. And as my mom would say "They go like sixty".
Eric


  #21   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,768
Default A Better Hinge

"Steve Walker" wrote in message
...

On 7/21/2017 5:58 PM, Bob La Londe wrote:
http://tacklemaker.info/index.php?ac...sa=view;pic=31
You shouldn't need to be logged on to see the image.

This is a pretty typical lead casting (sinkers, jigs, spinnerbaits, etc)
mold. The hinge shown works pretty darn well. It moves easily, and
does a good job of helping to hold the mold halves in alignment at the
hinge end. The opening (handle side) end has two alignment pins with
radius ends that mate the plates at that end. Over all my customers are
atleast acceptably happy with it. However to make a mold like this that
finishes as to 1/2 inch (apx) plates with a hinge I start out by
throwing away a third of the raw material. Basically I start with 3/4
inch flat bar and remove 1/4 inch to leave the 1/4" hinge bosses. It
just irks me to throw away 33% of the raw material on every one of these
molds.

No. Bolting a flat metal hinge to the ends is NOT a better way. It
simply will not hold up over time, and even if its handled with kid
gloves the heat cycling will cause it to work loose. I've seen molds
made by other mold makers with tacked on hinges, and they get pretty
beat up and very sloppy over time. It often results in damage to the
mold itself. Especially if cores, pins, and other inserts or materials
need to be placed in the mold before casting. These one piece boss
pinned hinges last through thousands of heat cycles. I've done larger
molds this same way that customers have told me they have literally run
tons of lead through. It would also require another setup to drill and
tap to tack on a sheet metal hinge.

Casting a billet with preformed mold bosses is not a great answer
either. The aluminum that results is more porous with the type of
foundry I could setup, and my quantity is to small to have them forged
cost efficiently. I think it might also drive up the per unit cost too
much unless I could cast or forge them in great quantities. On top of
that castings or forgings then have other machining that needs to be
done to make them useable. One mold company sells cast "blanks, but I
absolutely hate to work with them because the metal doesn't machine as
nicely and the surfaces are more of a pain to square up and also keep
the hinges squared up with both haves coming out aligned.

I did think of maybe using a third piece between the two plates with 4
pins instead of the two I use now, but then it would not help as much
with mold alignment. It would also be slower and more cludgy for the
customer to use the mold. Every idea I come up with is also more manual
work, or more secondary setup work.

Maybe they way I am doing it is the best way to get a decent result
within my work constraints, but I can't help but wonder if there isn't a
better way.

Tangent:
If anybody is curious. No I do not use a round over mill to get the
hinge bosses. I tried that in the past and I was not happy with it at
all. I cnc mill a radius on the boss with a .001 depth of cut and then
sand smooth when it comes off the mold. It would be faster to use a
round over mill, but because of the lead on the cutting flutes and lack
of consistency from one to the next it would waste part of the useable
surface of the mold plates. Make larger mold blanks to make up for it
then means slightly higher (few cents per unit atleast) material cost
and higher machine time clearing the face of the blank. It works out to
be a wash on that for cost and produces a CNC cutting the radius gives
better result in my opinion.





---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

Build the hinge separately, then dowel and bolt it to the ends of the
mold halves.

***********
Thanks for the suggestion.

  #22   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,888
Default A Better Hinge

"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
news
"Steve Walker" wrote in message
...

On 7/21/2017 5:58 PM, Bob La Londe wrote:
http://tacklemaker.info/index.php?ac...sa=view;pic=31
You shouldn't need to be logged on to see the image.

This is a pretty typical lead casting (sinkers, jigs, spinnerbaits,
etc)
mold. The hinge shown works pretty darn well. It moves easily,
and
does a good job of helping to hold the mold halves in alignment at
the
hinge end. The opening (handle side) end has two alignment pins
with
radius ends that mate the plates at that end. Over all my
customers are
atleast acceptably happy with it. However to make a mold like this
that
finishes as to 1/2 inch (apx) plates with a hinge I start out by
throwing away a third of the raw material. Basically I start with
3/4
inch flat bar and remove 1/4 inch to leave the 1/4" hinge bosses.
It
just irks me to throw away 33% of the raw material on every one of
these
molds.

No. Bolting a flat metal hinge to the ends is NOT a better way.
It
simply will not hold up over time, and even if its handled with kid
gloves the heat cycling will cause it to work loose. I've seen
molds
made by other mold makers with tacked on hinges, and they get
pretty
beat up and very sloppy over time. It often results in damage to
the
mold itself. Especially if cores, pins, and other inserts or
materials
need to be placed in the mold before casting. These one piece boss
pinned hinges last through thousands of heat cycles. I've done
larger
molds this same way that customers have told me they have literally
run
tons of lead through. It would also require another setup to drill
and
tap to tack on a sheet metal hinge.

Casting a billet with preformed mold bosses is not a great answer
either. The aluminum that results is more porous with the type of
foundry I could setup, and my quantity is to small to have them
forged
cost efficiently. I think it might also drive up the per unit cost
too
much unless I could cast or forge them in great quantities. On top
of
that castings or forgings then have other machining that needs to
be
done to make them useable. One mold company sells cast "blanks,
but I
absolutely hate to work with them because the metal doesn't machine
as
nicely and the surfaces are more of a pain to square up and also
keep
the hinges squared up with both haves coming out aligned.

I did think of maybe using a third piece between the two plates
with 4
pins instead of the two I use now, but then it would not help as
much
with mold alignment. It would also be slower and more cludgy for
the
customer to use the mold. Every idea I come up with is also more
manual
work, or more secondary setup work.

Maybe they way I am doing it is the best way to get a decent result
within my work constraints, but I can't help but wonder if there
isn't a
better way.

Tangent:
If anybody is curious. No I do not use a round over mill to get
the
hinge bosses. I tried that in the past and I was not happy with it
at
all. I cnc mill a radius on the boss with a .001 depth of cut and
then
sand smooth when it comes off the mold. It would be faster to use
a
round over mill, but because of the lead on the cutting flutes and
lack
of consistency from one to the next it would waste part of the
useable
surface of the mold plates. Make larger mold blanks to make up for
it
then means slightly higher (few cents per unit atleast) material
cost
and higher machine time clearing the face of the blank. It works
out to
be a wash on that for cost and produces a CNC cutting the radius
gives
better result in my opinion.





---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

Build the hinge separately, then dowel and bolt it to the ends of
the
mold halves.

***********
Thanks for the suggestion.


One-piece dowel plus bolt:
http://www.palmerbolt.com/product/14...tripper-bolts/


  #23   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,584
Default A Better Hinge

On 2017-08-01, Jim Wilkins wrote:
"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
news
"Steve Walker" wrote in message
...


[ ... ]

Build the hinge separately, then dowel and bolt it to the ends of
the
mold halves.

***********
Thanks for the suggestion.


One-piece dowel plus bolt:
http://www.palmerbolt.com/product/14...tripper-bolts/


Note that I have bought socket-head stripper bolts and
discovered that the thread was not truly concentric with the shoulder.
(It might have been concentric with the OD of the threads, but the PD
was certainly not concentric. Luckily, it was close enough so I could
make it work, but the upper piece would cycle as I turned the screw into
the lower piece.

Enjoy,
DoN.

--
Remove oil spill source from e-mail
Email: | (KV4PH) Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
(too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
--- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---
  #24   Report Post  
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,888
Default A Better Hinge

"DoN. Nichols" wrote in message
...
On 2017-08-01, Jim Wilkins wrote:
"Bob La Londe" wrote in message
news
"Steve Walker" wrote in message
...


[ ... ]

Build the hinge separately, then dowel and bolt it to the ends of
the
mold halves.

***********
Thanks for the suggestion.


One-piece dowel plus bolt:
http://www.palmerbolt.com/product/14...tripper-bolts/


Note that I have bought socket-head stripper bolts and
discovered that the thread was not truly concentric with the
shoulder.
(It might have been concentric with the OD of the threads, but the
PD
was certainly not concentric. Luckily, it was close enough so I
could
make it work, but the upper piece would cycle as I turned the screw
into
the lower piece.

Enjoy,
DoN.


I used them to assemble a lathe milling vise and had no such problem.
There was a slight variation in tightening torque but no movement.
The brand is "Precision Socket Screw, Inc."

Holo-Krome claims "perfect concentricity between threads and
shoulder".

-jsw


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Toilet seat hinge breaks, possible to just replace the hinge? Dan Musicant Home Repair 22 August 7th 17 04:44 PM
Bifold Door Hinge Issie - Hinge.jpg (1/1) [128K] Nymshifter #101345688 Home Repair 0 November 13th 12 10:30 AM
left hinge door, right hinge storm Cindy Hamilton[_2_] Home Repair 37 June 18th 10 08:10 PM
McMaster just gets better and better Winston Metalworking 8 March 2nd 08 08:16 PM
35mm kitchen hinge cutter! philosopher UK diy 6 July 8th 03 12:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"