A while back, didn't gunner have a sig with some drivel about
liberals, when backed into a corner, changing the subject to
homosexuality? It seems that Mr. Macho Gunner has taken to doing just
that lately.

Make of it what you will. I just thought it ought to be pointed out.

On Jun 13, 2:43*pm, rangerssuck wrote:
A while back, didn't gunner have a sig with some drivel about
liberals, when backed into a corner, changing the subject to
homosexuality? It seems that Mr. Macho Gunner has taken to doing just
that lately.

Make of it what you will. I just thought it ought to be pointed out.

Perhaps your vendetta should be quelled. It is getting really old. I
doubt anything Gunner puts in his Sig line is going to convert you to
the way he thinks, and I doubt he gives a damn that you have a very
different opinion than he does.

On Jun 13, 6:14*pm, RS at work wrote:
On Jun 13, 2:43*pm, rangerssuck wrote:

A while back, didn't gunner have a sig with some drivel about
liberals, when backed into a corner, changing the subject to
homosexuality? It seems that Mr. Macho Gunner has taken to doing just
that lately.

Make of it what you will. I just thought it ought to be pointed out.

Perhaps your vendetta should be quelled. *It is getting really old. *I
doubt anything Gunner puts in his Sig line is going to convert you to
the way he thinks, and I doubt he gives a damn that you have a very
different opinion than he does.

Not a vendetta at all, Roger. If Gunner wants to be for something and
against something else, that's fine with me. What I object to is the
fact that he often seems to end up following just the pattern of
behaviour that he mocks in others,

Again, and for the record, if I had the slightest interest in making
it so, Gunner would be speaking with a public defender, He has posted
way more than enough stuff here (true or false) to get an alphabet
soup of state and federal agencies interested in his doings.

So the vendetta of which you speak does not exist. I do ask, however
that Gunner at least make half an effort to keep his bull****
consistent.

On Jun 13, 7:38*pm, "Existential Angst" wrote:


Gunner sits down to pee.
--
EA

In which case, RogerN likely hates him.

No freedom of speech when it isn't you speaking?

----------------

"rangerssuck" wrote in message
...
Not a vendetta at all, Roger. If Gunner wants to be for something and
against something else, that's fine with me. What I object to is the
fact that he often seems to end up following just the pattern of
behaviour that he mocks in others,

Again, and for the record, if I had the slightest interest in making
it so, Gunner would be speaking with a public defender, He has posted
way more than enough stuff here (true or false) to get an alphabet
soup of state and federal agencies interested in his doings.

So the vendetta of which you speak does not exist. I do ask, however
that Gunner at least make half an effort to keep his bull****
consistent.

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:14:18 -0700 (PDT), RS at work
wrote:

On Jun 13, 2:43*pm, rangerssuck wrote:
A while back, didn't gunner have a sig with some drivel about
liberals, when backed into a corner, changing the subject to
homosexuality? It seems that Mr. Macho Gunner has taken to doing just
that lately.

Make of it what you will. I just thought it ought to be pointed out.

Perhaps your vendetta should be quelled. It is getting really old. I
doubt anything Gunner puts in his Sig line is going to convert you to
the way he thinks, and I doubt he gives a damn that you have a very
different opinion than he does.

??? I thought Rangersucker had died a year ago? Something about HIV
complications.

Shrug

Damn. Shrug...well..he is in my kill file, so I never see him.

Must have been put on a different life saving drug, for him to be still
alive.

Shrug again.

Gunner

"As physicists now know, there is some nonzero probability
that any object will,through quantum effects, tunnel from
the workbench in your shop to Floyds Knobs,Indiana
(unless your shop is already in Indiana, in which
case the object will tunnel to Trotters, North Dakota).

The smaller mass of the object, the higher the probability.
Therefore, disassembled parts, particularly small ones,
of machines disappear much faster than assembled machines."
Greg Dermer: rec.crafts.metalworking

On 6/13/2011 6:18 PM, rangerssuck wrote:
On Jun 13, 6:14 pm, RS at wrote:
On Jun 13, 2:43 pm, wrote:

A while back, didn't gunner have a sig with some drivel about
liberals, when backed into a corner, changing the subject to
homosexuality? It seems that Mr. Macho Gunner has taken to doing just
that lately.

Make of it what you will. I just thought it ought to be pointed out.

Perhaps your vendetta should be quelled. It is getting really old. I
doubt anything Gunner puts in his Sig line is going to convert you to
the way he thinks, and I doubt he gives a damn that you have a very
different opinion than he does.

Not a vendetta at all, Roger. If Gunner wants to be for something and
against something else, that's fine with me. What I object to is the
fact that he often seems to end up following just the pattern of
behaviour that he mocks in others,

Again, and for the record, if I had the slightest interest in making
it so, Gunner would be speaking with a public defender, He has posted
way more than enough stuff here (true or false) to get an alphabet
soup of state and federal agencies interested in his doings.

So the vendetta of which you speak does not exist. I do ask, however
that Gunner at least make half an effort to keep his bull****
consistent.


You're asking way too much from Gummer is you want anything besides a
bunch of really stupid, misinformed, opinions.

Hawke

English as a second language, maybe?

---------------

"Hawke" wrote in message ...

You're asking way too much from Gummer is you want anything besides a
bunch of really stupid, misinformed, opinions.

Hawke

English as a second language, maybe?

---------------

"Hawke" wrote in message ...

You're asking way too much from Gummer is you want anything besides a
bunch of really stupid, misinformed, opinions.

Hawke

rangerssuck wrote:

A while back, didn't gunner have a sig with some drivel about
liberals, when backed into a corner, changing the subject to
homosexuality? It seems that Mr. Macho Gunner has taken to doing just
that lately.

Make of it what you will. I just thought it ought to be pointed out.

I know Gunners positions, I know yours, I really don't care to keep score. If you haven't
figured it out by now, Gunner loves tweaking people he doesn't agree with. Now, please
tell me, what did you accomplish with your post? I'm thinking Gunner is keeping an eye on
the drag since he got a bite and is laughing his arse off.

Wes

"Wes" wrote in message
...
rangerssuck wrote:

A while back, didn't gunner have a sig with some drivel about
liberals, when backed into a corner, changing the subject to
homosexuality? It seems that Mr. Macho Gunner has taken to doing just
that lately.

Make of it what you will. I just thought it ought to be pointed out.

I know Gunners positions, I know yours, I really don't care to keep score.
If you haven't
figured it out by now, Gunner loves tweaking people he doesn't agree with.
Now, please
tell me, what did you accomplish with your post? I'm thinking Gunner is
keeping an eye on
the drag since he got a bite and is laughing his arse off.


Except, it's not about Gunner's "positions"...

--rather, it's about him being a hypocritical douchebag.

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:49:04 -0400, Wes
wrote:

rangerssuck trolled:
--snip--
I know Gunners positions, I know yours, I really don't care to keep score. If you haven't
figured it out by now, Gunner loves tweaking people he doesn't agree with. Now, please
tell me, what did you accomplish with your post? I'm thinking Gunner is keeping an eye on
the drag since he got a bite and is laughing his arse off.

Why does everyone persist in dialog with known trolls?

--
To know the road ahead, ask those coming back.
-- Chinese Proverb

On 6/14/2011 6:53 PM, Larry Jaques wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:49:04 -0400, Wes
wrote:


Why does everyone persist in dialog with known trolls?

--
To know the road ahead, ask those coming back.
-- Chinese Proverb

because it's better than dealing with their own deficiencies?


--
www.wbnoble.com

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:49:04 -0400, Wes
wrote:

rangerssuck wrote:

A while back, didn't gunner have a sig with some drivel about
liberals, when backed into a corner, changing the subject to
homosexuality? It seems that Mr. Macho Gunner has taken to doing just
that lately.

Make of it what you will. I just thought it ought to be pointed out.

I know Gunners positions, I know yours, I really don't care to keep score. If you haven't
figured it out by now, Gunner loves tweaking people he doesn't agree with. Now, please
tell me, what did you accomplish with your post? I'm thinking Gunner is keeping an eye on
the drag since he got a bite and is laughing his arse off.

Wes

VBG

Gunner

--
Maxim 12: A soft answer turneth away wrath.
Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head.

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:59:59 -0700, Bill Noble
wrote:

On 6/14/2011 6:53 PM, Larry Jaques wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:49:04 -0400, Wes
wrote:


Why does everyone persist in dialog with known trolls?

--
To know the road ahead, ask those coming back.
-- Chinese Proverb

because it's better than dealing with their own deficiencies?

So why are YOU involved Comrade?

Gunner

--
Maxim 12: A soft answer turneth away wrath.
Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head.

On 6/14/2011 7:42 AM, Josepi wrote:
English as a second language, maybe?

---------------

"Hawke" wrote in message ...
You're asking way too much from Gummer if you want anything besides a
bunch of really stupid, misinformed, opinions.

Hawke


More likely a typo, don't you think? There, I fixed it. Hope you get it now.

Hawke

Larry Jaques wrote:

Why does everyone persist in dialog with known trolls?

I was bored.

Wes

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:19:14 -0400, Wes
wrote:

Larry Jaques wrote:

Why does everyone persist in dialog with known trolls?

I was bored.

No excuse. FIFTY lashes wi the cat!

--
"The history of temperature change over time is related to
the shape of the continents, the shape of the sea floor,
the pulling apart of the crust, the stitching back together
of the crust, the opening and closing of sea ways, changes
in the Earth's orbit, changes in solar energy, supernoval
eruptions, comet dust, impacts by comets and asteroids,
volcanic activity, bacteria, soil formation, sedimentation,
ocean currents, and the chemistry of air. If we humans, in
a fit of ego, think we can change these normal planetary
processes, then we need stronger medication."
--Ian Plimer
_Heaven and Earth: Global Warming, the Missing Science_

[sheeple format corrected]

We expect as much quality from you as you do from Gunner. Don't let it
happen again, troll.


-----------
"Hawke" wrote in message ...
More likely a typo, don't you think? There, I fixed it. Hope you get it now.

Hawke

-----------
On 6/14/2011 7:42 AM, Josepi wrote:
English as a second language, maybe?

---------------

"Hawke" wrote in message ...
You're asking way too much from Gummer if you want anything besides a
bunch of really stupid, misinformed, opinions.

Hawke

Put that ****er in your killfile.

I put Larry Jaques in my bozobin quite some time back and really don't want
to see his whining about everybody else

Thanx.

------

"Wes" wrote in message
...
I was bored.

Wes

----------
Larry Jaques wrote:

Why does everyone persist in dialog with known trolls?

Gunner Asch wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:59:59 -0700, Bill Noble
wrote:

On 6/14/2011 6:53 PM, Larry Jaques wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:49:04 -0400, Wes
wrote:


Why does everyone persist in dialog with known trolls?

--
To know the road ahead, ask those coming back.
-- Chinese Proverb

because it's better than dealing with their own deficiencies?

So why are YOU involved Comrade?


He's finally out of any ebay crap to shill?


--
It's easy to think outside the box, when you have a cutting torch.