Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
Well, between Cliff and TMT, the signal/noise ratio here has exceeded
the value of the sparse metalworking content provided. My newsreader doesn't have decent filtering and I'm loathe to add another add-on to the overhead. I don't have time to pick through 800 posts a day to find a few gems, or an unsuspecting newbie needing some help.. I guess I'll go back to Practical Machinist for a while. |
#2
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:15:53 -0500, with neither quill nor qualm, Rex
quickly quoth: Well, between Cliff and TMT, the signal/noise ratio here has exceeded the value of the sparse metalworking content provided. My newsreader doesn't have decent filtering and I'm loathe to add another add-on to the overhead. I don't have time to pick through 800 posts a day to find a few gems, or an unsuspecting newbie needing some help.. I guess I'll go back to Practical Machinist for a while. I'm irritated at having to hit the "Ignore" button on 75% of the posts, too. But it doesn't take long. I download them all (30 seconds via DSL nowadays) and then kill most of them. What ****es me off are all the replies to known trollings by (otherwise) intelligent folks. Amazing! sigh Well, we all have our bears to cross. -- Change is the process by which the future invades our lives. -- Alvin Toffler |
#3
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
Larry Jaques wrote:
I'm irritated at having to hit the "Ignore" button on 75% of the posts, too. But it doesn't take long. I download them all (30 seconds via DSL nowadays) and then kill most of them. What ****es me off are all the replies to known trollings by (otherwise) intelligent folks. Amazing! sigh Well, we all have our bears to cross. After noticing TMT starting a couple threads off with a cross post to alt.survivalism, I set a filter on him. It expires in 30 days but I can always upgrade it. I can't promise I won't argue with Ed though. Wes |
#4
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
"Larry Jaques" wrote in message ... On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:15:53 -0500, with neither quill nor qualm, Rex quickly quoth: Well, between Cliff and TMT, the signal/noise ratio here has exceeded the value of the sparse metalworking content provided. My newsreader doesn't have decent filtering and I'm loathe to add another add-on to the overhead. I don't have time to pick through 800 posts a day to find a few gems, or an unsuspecting newbie needing some help.. I guess I'll go back to Practical Machinist for a while. I'm irritated at having to hit the "Ignore" button on 75% of the posts, too. But it doesn't take long. I download them all (30 seconds via DSL nowadays) and then kill most of them. What ****es me off are all the replies to known trollings by (otherwise) intelligent folks. Amazing! sigh Well, we all have our bears to cross. -- Change is the process by which the future invades our lives. -- Alvin Toffler Am I the only one that still uses OE? I can glance through the headers in a few seconds and the OT stuff doesn't bother me...how could it, I can simply ignore without opening the entire thread. What's with the 800 posts/day he's talking about? I see about 30 on a good day, a half a page. |
#5
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
Rex wrote: Well, between Cliff and TMT, the signal/noise ratio here has exceeded the value of the sparse metalworking content provided. My newsreader doesn't have decent filtering and I'm loathe to add another add-on to the overhead. I don't have time to pick through 800 posts a day to find a few gems, or an unsuspecting newbie needing some help.. I guess I'll go back to Practical Machinist for a while. My version of Thunderbird has 'message filters' under 'tools' and 'create filter from message' under 'message' at the top of the page. -- aioe.org is home to cowards and terrorists Add this line to your news proxy nfilter.dat file * drop Path:*aioe.org!not-for-mail to drop all aioe.org traffic. http://improve-usenet.org/index.html |
#6
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
Maxwell Lol wrote: Rex writes: Well, between Cliff and TMT, the signal/noise ratio here has exceeded the value of the sparse metalworking content provided. My newsreader doesn't have decent filtering and I'm loathe to add another add-on to the overhead. Thunderbird is a mail program, and not really a news reader. Using a real news reader isn't an "add-on". It's a replacement. Killfiles can be fast and painless. I like the newsreader in Netscape 4.78. I've used it since it first came out. -- aioe.org is home to cowards and terrorists Add this line to your news proxy nfilter.dat file * drop Path:*aioe.org!not-for-mail to drop all aioe.org traffic. http://improve-usenet.org/index.html |
#7
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Maxwell Lol wrote: Rex writes: Well, between Cliff and TMT, the signal/noise ratio here has exceeded the value of the sparse metalworking content provided. My newsreader doesn't have decent filtering and I'm loathe to add another add-on to the overhead. Thunderbird is a mail program, and not really a news reader. Using a real news reader isn't an "add-on". It's a replacement. Killfiles can be fast and painless. I like the newsreader in Netscape 4.78. I've used it since it first came out. I used that one for years. Still do on my '98 laptop. But 7.2 is worth the effort for an upgrade. Richard -- (remove the X to email) It's never too late to be the person you might have been. George Elliot |
#8
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
cavelamb himself wrote: Michael A. Terrell wrote: Maxwell Lol wrote: Rex writes: Well, between Cliff and TMT, the signal/noise ratio here has exceeded the value of the sparse metalworking content provided. My newsreader doesn't have decent filtering and I'm loathe to add another add-on to the overhead. Thunderbird is a mail program, and not really a news reader. Using a real news reader isn't an "add-on". It's a replacement. Killfiles can be fast and painless. I like the newsreader in Netscape 4.78. I've used it since it first came out. I used that one for years. Still do on my '98 laptop. But 7.2 is worth the effort for an upgrade. I have my archive of old posts and couldn't get them to work properly with 7.2. I have moved the original instal from computer to computer, along with the archives by installing the 4.78, then overwriting the folder with the data from the older computer. I's made it through at least six computers that way, starting with my first win 95 computer. (150 MHz, 16 MB P1) -- aioe.org is home to cowards and terrorists Add this line to your news proxy nfilter.dat file * drop Path:*aioe.org!not-for-mail to drop all aioe.org traffic. http://improve-usenet.org/index.html |
#9
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Maxwell Lol wrote: Rex writes: Well, between Cliff and TMT, the signal/noise ratio here has exceeded the value of the sparse metalworking content provided. My newsreader doesn't have decent filtering and I'm loathe to add another add-on to the overhead. Thunderbird is a mail program, and not really a news reader. Using a real news reader isn't an "add-on". It's a replacement. Killfiles can be fast and painless. I like the newsreader in Netscape 4.78. I've used it since it first came out. I am usine Netscape 7.2 and don't have many problems The "T" key gets rid of any thread I don't want and highlights the next one not read. ...lew...only reading this because I'm bored with school closed |
#10
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
Lew Hartswick wrote: Michael A. Terrell wrote: Maxwell Lol wrote: Rex writes: Well, between Cliff and TMT, the signal/noise ratio here has exceeded the value of the sparse metalworking content provided. My newsreader doesn't have decent filtering and I'm loathe to add another add-on to the overhead. Thunderbird is a mail program, and not really a news reader. Using a real news reader isn't an "add-on". It's a replacement. Killfiles can be fast and painless. I like the newsreader in Netscape 4.78. I've used it since it first came out. I am usine Netscape 7.2 and don't have many problems The "T" key gets rid of any thread I don't want and highlights the next one not read. ...lew...only reading this because I'm bored with school closed I tried 7.2, and switched back after a few hours. I have 'control K' on 4.78 to kill threads. -- aioe.org is home to cowards and terrorists Add this line to your news proxy nfilter.dat file * drop Path:*aioe.org!not-for-mail to drop all aioe.org traffic. http://improve-usenet.org/index.html |
#11
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
"Tom Gardner" wrote in message ... Am I the only one that still uses OE? Nope. Blocking a sender in OE is a 10 second job. Both TMT and Cliff have had a secure place on by blocked list for years now. Just take a moment to learn how to use what you've got. Reading rcm is normally an enjoyable experience for me because there is simply no need to suffer trolls. Vaughn |
#12
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Rex wrote: Well, between Cliff and TMT, the signal/noise ratio here has exceeded the value of the sparse metalworking content provided. My newsreader doesn't have decent filtering and I'm loathe to add another add-on to the overhead. I don't have time to pick through 800 posts a day to find a few gems, or an unsuspecting newbie needing some help.. I guess I'll go back to Practical Machinist for a while. My version of Thunderbird has 'message filters' under 'tools' and 'create filter from message' under 'message' at the top of the page. Mine does too, and I use it for email, but it does not work on newsgroups |
#13
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
Rex B wrote: Michael A. Terrell wrote: Rex wrote: Well, between Cliff and TMT, the signal/noise ratio here has exceeded the value of the sparse metalworking content provided. My newsreader doesn't have decent filtering and I'm loathe to add another add-on to the overhead. I don't have time to pick through 800 posts a day to find a few gems, or an unsuspecting newbie needing some help.. I guess I'll go back to Practical Machinist for a while. My version of Thunderbird has 'message filters' under 'tools' and 'create filter from message' under 'message' at the top of the page. Mine does too, and I use it for email, but it does not work on newsgroups That must be why I stopped using it. Using a newsreader without filters is like a car with no wheels. You might get there, but you won't enjoy the ride. -- aioe.org is home to cowards and terrorists Add this line to your news proxy nfilter.dat file * drop Path:*aioe.org!not-for-mail to drop all aioe.org traffic. http://improve-usenet.org/index.html |
#14
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
"Vaughn Simon" wrote in message ... "Tom Gardner" wrote in message ... Am I the only one that still uses OE? Nope. Blocking a sender in OE is a 10 second job. Both TMT and Cliff have had a secure place on by blocked list for years now. Just take a moment to learn how to use what you've got. Reading rcm is normally an enjoyable experience for me because there is simply no need to suffer trolls. Vaughn I never could figure out what all the complaining was about, Is OE not "cool" enough? It seems to do a great job for me. |
#15
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
On 2008-03-25, Tom Gardner wrote:
"Larry Jaques" wrote in message ... On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:15:53 -0500, with neither quill nor qualm, Rex quickly quoth: [ ... ] I don't have time to pick through 800 posts a day to find a few gems, or an unsuspecting newbie needing some help.. I guess I'll go back to Practical Machinist for a while. I'm irritated at having to hit the "Ignore" button on 75% of the posts, too. But it doesn't take long. I download them all (30 seconds via DSL nowadays) and then kill most of them. What ****es me off are all the replies to known trollings by (otherwise) intelligent folks. Amazing! sigh Well, we all have our bears to cross. [ ... ] Am I the only one that still uses OE? I don't know, though I fear not. I know that I can't use OE, and am glad that I can't. I can glance through the headers in a few seconds and the OT stuff doesn't bother me...how could it, I can simply ignore without opening the entire thread. What's with the 800 posts/day he's talking about? I see about 30 on a good day, a half a page. It is a function of how good your news server's spam filtering is before things get to you. I get about 300 per day, of which 200 are zapped by the killfile -- many on IP range to get rid of a lot of the real spam (China, India, and a few others), and some varying percentage on "Subject: " header contents, plus a few on "From: " (which get rid of quite a few). My "Subject: " ones are set up to die after typically 30 days, since an off-topic thread seldom runs longer than that. If it does, I just put it in for another 30 days. :-) If you are only seeing 30 on a good day (prior to you killing off those you don't want to read), I would suggest that your news server is killing off too much. Enjoy, DoN. -- Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero --- |
#16
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
Tom Gardner wrote: "Vaughn Simon" wrote in message ... "Tom Gardner" wrote in message ... Am I the only one that still uses OE? Nope. Blocking a sender in OE is a 10 second job. Both TMT and Cliff have had a secure place on by blocked list for years now. Just take a moment to learn how to use what you've got. Reading rcm is normally an enjoyable experience for me because there is simply no need to suffer trolls. Vaughn I never could figure out what all the complaining was about, Is OE not "cool" enough? It seems to do a great job for me. Too many security problems. Before some of the major patches it would open and run a trojan program without you even opening the message. add .jpg or any other image extension to an executable, and it would run it without asking permission. Remember the SVEN virus? OE helped to spread it and infect millions of computers. -- aioe.org is home to cowards and terrorists Add this line to your news proxy nfilter.dat file * drop Path:*aioe.org!not-for-mail to drop all aioe.org traffic. http://improve-usenet.org/index.html |
#17
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
Tom Gardner wrote:
"Vaughn Simon" wrote in message ... "Tom Gardner" wrote in message . .. Am I the only one that still uses OE? Nope. Blocking a sender in OE is a 10 second job. Both TMT and Cliff have had a secure place on by blocked list for years now. Just take a moment to learn how to use what you've got. Reading rcm is normally an enjoyable experience for me because there is simply no need to suffer trolls. Vaughn I never could figure out what all the complaining was about, Is OE not "cool" enough? It seems to do a great job for me. It's an After-the-fact knock off of Netscape (Mozilla). Richard -- (remove the X to email) It's never too late to be the person you might have been. George Elliot |
#18
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
"Maxwell Lol" wrote in message ... Rex writes: Well, between Cliff and TMT, the signal/noise ratio here has exceeded the value of the sparse metalworking content provided. My newsreader doesn't have decent filtering and I'm loathe to add another add-on to the overhead. Thunderbird is a mail program, and not really a news reader. Using a real news reader isn't an "add-on". It's a replacement. Killfiles can be fast and painless. Speaking for myself, the problem here are the off-topic posters and no amount of "better" newsreaders is going to fix that. The problem is rampant across all the "serious" newsgroups I read. |
#19
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 23:42:57 -0400, Tom Gardner wrote:
"Vaughn Simon" wrote in message ... Nope. Blocking a sender in OE is a 10 second job. Both TMT and Cliff have had a secure place on by blocked list for years now. Just take a moment to learn how to use what you've got. Reading rcm is normally an enjoyable experience for me because there is simply no need to suffer trolls. I never could figure out what all the complaining was about, Is OE not "cool" enough? It seems to do a great job for me. In all seriousness, there are tools dedicated to newsreading which have better workflow for reading, filtering, killfiling, and so on. OE works, sure, but it's kind of like driving on all-season tires. Average in any conditions. If you buy snow tires for winter, and performance tires for summer, you get a better product all the time compared to a generic "do everything and nothing well" product. It's significantly better as a newsreader than google news's web interface, though. |
#20
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:10:30 -0600, Mike Henry wrote:
Speaking for myself, the problem here are the off-topic posters and no amount of "better" newsreaders is going to fix that. The problem is rampant across all the "serious" newsgroups I read. Actually, you might find that many of these off-topic posters are posting to multiple newsgroups. A decent newsreader will let you killfile by regular expression, so you can block, say, Newsgroups: *,*,* ....which will block anything crossposted to 3 or more groups (like Cliff's Crap). Amazing how much of the crap that takes out. And as DoN stated, (paraphrasing), blocking entire continents by IP range, is quite effective as well. |
#21
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
On 2008-03-27, Mike Henry wrote:
"Maxwell Lol" wrote in message ... [ ... ] Thunderbird is a mail program, and not really a news reader. Using a real news reader isn't an "add-on". It's a replacement. Killfiles can be fast and painless. Speaking for myself, the problem here are the off-topic posters and no amount of "better" newsreaders is going to fix that. The problem is rampant across all the "serious" newsgroups I read. Well ... my killfile (in a better newsreader) kills of about 66% of the typical day's traffic. Some of that is spam killed based on IP address range (such as the frequent footwear spams from China) , some spam killed based on wildcard matching in the "Subject: " header. However -- some is permanent killfiling of a few individuals, and adding OT (typically political) "Subject: " lines to the killfile for 30 days (after which they are automatically removed -- and the discussion has usually died by then as well. This keeps what is left a lot more fun to read. So -- yes, a better newsreader can make things a lot better. FWIW, the one which I currently use is "slrn", which I believe has been ported to Windows as well as being available on must flavors of unix (including Macs running OS-X, which really have a unix hiding under the GUI.) Enjoy, DoN. -- Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero --- |
#22
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
bandwidth
On 27 Mar 2008 17:35:13 -0400, Maxwell Lol wrote:
Dave Hinz writes: Actually, you might find that many of these off-topic posters are posting to multiple newsgroups. A decent newsreader will let you killfile by regular expression, so you can block, say, Newsgroups: *,*,* If it's a RE, You probably mean Newsgroups: .*,.*, Hm. My regexp will block any post sent to 3 or more groups, yours I believe wouldn't hit unless a newsgroup's name starts with a . Perhaps different apps expand it differently, though. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tek 475A CH1 bandwidth | Electronics Repair | |||
Really stupid musings, sorry 'bout the waste of bandwidth | Woodworking | |||
TP Bandwidth question | Electronics | |||
Can one "overclock" a CRT monitor's video input bandwidth? Need slightly higher refresh rate than my existng CRT allows... | Electronics Repair |