Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
OSHA showed up at work the other day.
Oh joy, oh joy, another reason to get the boss paranoid. After the grand tour and filling out reams of papers and causing the boss to look sadder than Droopy the cartoon dog, the bottom line was that we have to change out all the air lines (explosive hazard) and get trained on how to put on safety glasses and how to insert earplugs into our ears. In addition, we have to put up "exit" signs. This brought up a few questions in my mind: 1. If I don't know how to put my glasses on, how are they going to train me? They can't give me written instructions because I can't read (blind or visually impaired; take your pick) without glasses. They can't give me verbal instructions because I obviously don't know how to wear earplugs and after 12 years of working there I must be deaf (hearing impaired for the politically correct crowd) . 2. How are they going to tell me how to put my earplugs in if I can't hear? 3. What good are the EXIT signs if I can't read them because I don't know how to put my glasses on? 4. How the hell have I been managing to get out of the building all these years without a sign to tell me. 5. How about an ENTRANCE sign? If I don't know how to get out of the building without a sign then I sure as hell wouldn't know how to get in. On a previous visit, OSHA was pleased with all the signs around the shop spaces telling the uninformed that they should wear eye protection. However (there are always "howevers" when it comes to beaurocrats) they thought we might be confused when it came time to measure a part in the comparator (which is surrounded by blackout curtains). So in their infinite wisdom, they decided that we needed a sign to tell us that eye protection was NOT needed when using the comparator. This brought up a quandary for the blind as a bat crowd like me who need glasses to see. Am I required to take my glasses off to use the comparator? Or is it optional? My boss did not exhibit a sense of humor when I asked him these questions. Those Minds "Hi, I'm from the government and I'm here to help you" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
In article , Those Minds says...
My boss did not exhibit a sense of humor when I asked him these questions. Odd, they *never* do. Indeed I have found that repeated questionings like that can lead to a rapid exit from the employement! Jim ================================================== please reply to: JRR(zero) at yktvmv (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com ================================================== |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
"Those Minds" wrote:
OSHA showed up at work the other day. Oh joy, oh joy, another reason to get the boss paranoid. After the grand tour and filling out reams of papers and causing the boss to look sadder than Droopy the cartoon dog, the bottom line was that we have to change out all the air lines (explosive hazard) and get trained on how to put on safety glasses and how to insert earplugs into our ears. In addition, we have to put up "exit" signs. This brought up a few questions in my mind: 1. If I don't know how to put my glasses on, how are they going to train me? They can't give me written instructions because I can't read (blind or visually impaired; take your pick) without glasses. They can't give me verbal instructions because I obviously don't know how to wear earplugs and after 12 years of working there I must be deaf (hearing impaired for the politically correct crowd) . 2. How are they going to tell me how to put my earplugs in if I can't hear? 3. What good are the EXIT signs if I can't read them because I don't know how to put my glasses on? 4. How the hell have I been managing to get out of the building all these years without a sign to tell me. 5. How about an ENTRANCE sign? If I don't know how to get out of the building without a sign then I sure as hell wouldn't know how to get in. On a previous visit, OSHA was pleased with all the signs around the shop spaces telling the uninformed that they should wear eye protection. However (there are always "howevers" when it comes to beaurocrats) they thought we might be confused when it came time to measure a part in the comparator (which is surrounded by blackout curtains). So in their infinite wisdom, they decided that we needed a sign to tell us that eye protection was NOT needed when using the comparator. This brought up a quandary for the blind as a bat crowd like me who need glasses to see. Am I required to take my glasses off to use the comparator? Or is it optional? My boss did not exhibit a sense of humor when I asked him these questions. Those Minds "Hi, I'm from the government and I'm here to help you" So did they issue any fines? It seems that OSHA has become quite profitable around here. A typical fine is $7,500.00. And they always find something that is deserving of a fine. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
He said "probably" $300 per violation
"George" wrote in message ... So did they issue any fines? It seems that OSHA has become quite profitable around here. A typical fine is $7,500.00. And they always find something that is deserving of a fine. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
Those Minds wrote:
OSHA showed up at work the other day. snip look sadder than Droopy the cartoon dog, the bottom line was that we have to change out all the air lines (explosive hazard) and get trained on how to Are these PVC? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
Thankfully, he understands my sense of humor and hasn't held it against me.
I know if I worked for me I would have fired me a long time ago Those Minds "jim rozen" wrote in message ... In article , Those Minds says... My boss did not exhibit a sense of humor when I asked him these questions. Odd, they *never* do. Indeed I have found that repeated questionings like that can lead to a rapid exit from the employement! Jim ================================================== please reply to: JRR(zero) at yktvmv (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com ================================================== |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
Although I completely agree that OSHA is generally a bit overbearing, the
sad truth is that if an accident were to occur and the cause be found to be one of these items that OSHA advised to clean up, guess who would lose their ass in the resulting lawsuit. My office has joined in a voluntary program from OSHA called STAR where we ask OSHA to come in and give us suggestions on what needs fixing and they do so with the agreement that they can't impose fines or penalties. That way, we get to claim OSHA compliance and we don't have the risk of racking up big fines from a surprise inspection visit. Robert "Those Minds" wrote in message ... OSHA showed up at work the other day. Oh joy, oh joy, another reason to get the boss paranoid. After the grand tour and filling out reams of papers and causing the boss to look sadder than Droopy the cartoon dog, the bottom line was that we have to change out all the air lines (explosive hazard) and get trained on how to put on safety glasses and how to insert earplugs into our ears. In addition, we have to put up "exit" signs. This brought up a few questions in my mind: 1. If I don't know how to put my glasses on, how are they going to train me? They can't give me written instructions because I can't read (blind or visually impaired; take your pick) without glasses. They can't give me verbal instructions because I obviously don't know how to wear earplugs and after 12 years of working there I must be deaf (hearing impaired for the politically correct crowd) . 2. How are they going to tell me how to put my earplugs in if I can't hear? 3. What good are the EXIT signs if I can't read them because I don't know how to put my glasses on? 4. How the hell have I been managing to get out of the building all these years without a sign to tell me. 5. How about an ENTRANCE sign? If I don't know how to get out of the building without a sign then I sure as hell wouldn't know how to get in. On a previous visit, OSHA was pleased with all the signs around the shop spaces telling the uninformed that they should wear eye protection. However (there are always "howevers" when it comes to beaurocrats) they thought we might be confused when it came time to measure a part in the comparator (which is surrounded by blackout curtains). So in their infinite wisdom, they decided that we needed a sign to tell us that eye protection was NOT needed when using the comparator. This brought up a quandary for the blind as a bat crowd like me who need glasses to see. Am I required to take my glasses off to use the comparator? Or is it optional? My boss did not exhibit a sense of humor when I asked him these questions. Those Minds "Hi, I'm from the government and I'm here to help you" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
"Those Minds" wrote in message ... Thankfully, he understands my sense of humor and hasn't held it against me. I know if I worked for me I would have fired me a long time ago Those Minds Chuckle! That's exactly what I told the guy that fired me from the last job I held, about two weeks before I was going to quit. My machines were in but not yet set up to operate. I was starting my humble shop, from which I had every intention of making my living (which I did). The sight of his jaw glancing off the floor when I handed him my business card was worth it all! Harold |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
Yup, they are PVC.
We've had a few ruptures in the past and the owners knew that the PVC was "illegal", but kept using the excuse that the new stuff was too expensive and would fix it later. No excuses for that and should get whatever fine is necessary IMHO. Those Minds "Ian Stirling" wrote in message ... Those Minds wrote: OSHA showed up at work the other day. snip look sadder than Droopy the cartoon dog, the bottom line was that we have to change out all the air lines (explosive hazard) and get trained on how to Are these PVC? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
I completely agree that OSHA has its place int the world, but sometimes they
do not allow for common sense some times. I like to poke fun at gub'ment beaurocracies and their habit of looking for reasons to exist. I have noticed though that once a Gub'nent agency finds out you exist, they never want to go away. Where I work, OSHA never visited until a disgruntled ex employee blew the whistle about using diesel instead of honing oil in the hone (not true). We have been visited about six times since. To their credit, the fines have been minimal and we have tried to keep up on the regs. On the flip side, my spousal unit works at a place that OSHA has never visited, and their safety program is non-existant. Don't get me wrong here, they are not an unsafe place to work, but they do not do the paprework functions and don't do the safety committee meetings etc. Those Minds "Siggy" wrote in message . .. Although I completely agree that OSHA is generally a bit overbearing, the sad truth is that if an accident were to occur and the cause be found to be one of these items that OSHA advised to clean up, guess who would lose their ass in the resulting lawsuit. My office has joined in a voluntary program from OSHA called STAR where we ask OSHA to come in and give us suggestions on what needs fixing and they do so with the agreement that they can't impose fines or penalties. That way, we get to claim OSHA compliance and we don't have the risk of racking up big fines from a surprise inspection visit. Robert "Those Minds" wrote in message ... OSHA showed up at work the other day. Oh joy, oh joy, another reason to get the boss paranoid. After the grand tour and filling out reams of papers and causing the boss to look sadder than Droopy the cartoon dog, the bottom line was that we have to change out all the air lines (explosive hazard) and get trained on how to put on safety glasses and how to insert earplugs into our ears. In addition, we have to put up "exit" signs. This brought up a few questions in my mind: 1. If I don't know how to put my glasses on, how are they going to train me? They can't give me written instructions because I can't read (blind or visually impaired; take your pick) without glasses. They can't give me verbal instructions because I obviously don't know how to wear earplugs and after 12 years of working there I must be deaf (hearing impaired for the politically correct crowd) . 2. How are they going to tell me how to put my earplugs in if I can't hear? 3. What good are the EXIT signs if I can't read them because I don't know how to put my glasses on? 4. How the hell have I been managing to get out of the building all these years without a sign to tell me. 5. How about an ENTRANCE sign? If I don't know how to get out of the building without a sign then I sure as hell wouldn't know how to get in. On a previous visit, OSHA was pleased with all the signs around the shop spaces telling the uninformed that they should wear eye protection. However (there are always "howevers" when it comes to beaurocrats) they thought we might be confused when it came time to measure a part in the comparator (which is surrounded by blackout curtains). So in their infinite wisdom, they decided that we needed a sign to tell us that eye protection was NOT needed when using the comparator. This brought up a quandary for the blind as a bat crowd like me who need glasses to see. Am I required to take my glasses off to use the comparator? Or is it optional? My boss did not exhibit a sense of humor when I asked him these questions. Those Minds "Hi, I'm from the government and I'm here to help you" |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
"Those Minds" wrote in message ... OSHA showed up at work the other day. Oh joy, oh joy, another reason to get the boss paranoid. After the grand tour and filling out reams of papers and causing the boss to look sadder than Droopy the cartoon dog, the bottom line was that we have to change out all the air lines (explosive hazard) and get trained on how to put on safety glasses and how to insert earplugs into our ears. In addition, we have to put up "exit" signs. About 4 months after the new office space opened up, the men's/women's signs were replaced. The new ones had brail so one could tell it was men's and not women's. I kept thinking to myself, what sort of moron is going to lead a blind person through this maze of cubicals and not tell them the men's is on the right? Joel. phx Then there's the brail on the drive up ATMs, but we won't go there.... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
"Those Minds" wrote in
: OSHA showed up at work the other day. Oh joy, oh joy, another reason to get the boss paranoid. After the grand tour and filling out reams of papers and causing the boss to look sadder than Droopy the cartoon dog, the bottom line was that we have to change out all the air lines (explosive hazard) and get trained on how to put on safety glasses and how to insert earplugs into our ears. In addition, we have to put up "exit" signs. If the air lines are PVC, I agree with OSHA. Plastic can become brittle in the presence of certian oils and other chemicals. You are possibly looking at hundreds of little shards of very sharp plastic being shot out much like a anti-personnel round should the line rupture. This brought up a few questions in my mind: 1. If I don't know how to put my glasses on, how are they going to train me? They can't give me written instructions because I can't read (blind or visually impaired; take your pick) without glasses. They can't give me verbal instructions because I obviously don't know how to wear earplugs and after 12 years of working there I must be deaf (hearing impaired for the politically correct crowd) . I realize the fun you are poking here, but honestly, you would be suprised at the number of folks who don't understand proper eye protection. This includes side shields. I've had eye damage from chips before, not fun....at all....I work with a fella who lost an eye from improperly wearing his safety glasses. Unfortunately, I've seen several people hurt in an industrial environment, as probably many people here have. Fortunately, i've kept all my important body parts out of danger, only minor accidents, but some people aren't so lucky. *MOST* of the time, the employee was doing something unsafe at the time of the accident (operator disabled safety device, bypassed safety device, climbing without a ladder, reaching into moving machinery, etc) There have been instances where equipment failed, causing injury, but those are very rare compared to the previous reason. It can not only cost you some body part...it can cost you your life, I've see one of those in my lifetime, and I hope I never see another. (Operator disabled one safety device and bypassed another - it cost him his life.) 2. How are they going to tell me how to put my earplugs in if I can't hear? 3. What good are the EXIT signs if I can't read them because I don't know how to put my glasses on? 4. How the hell have I been managing to get out of the building all these years without a sign to tell me. Those are lighted, battery backup emergency lights. Should the power fail, a fire where smoke is thick, or other emergency arise, those lights stay on. -- Anthony You can't 'idiot proof' anything....every time you try, they just make better idiots. Remove sp to reply via email |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
"Those Minds" wrote in message ... OSHA showed up at work the other day. Oh joy, oh joy, another reason to get the boss paranoid. After the grand tour and filling out reams of papers and causing the boss to look sadder than Droopy the cartoon dog, the bottom line was that we have to change out all the air lines (explosive hazard) and get trained on how to put on safety glasses and how to insert earplugs into our ears. In addition, we have to put up "exit" signs. This brought up a few questions in my mind: 1. If I don't know how to put my glasses on, how are they going to train me? They can't give me written instructions because I can't read (blind or visually impaired; take your pick) without glasses. They can't give me verbal instructions because I obviously don't know how to wear earplugs and after 12 years of working there I must be deaf (hearing impaired for the politically correct crowd) . 2. How are they going to tell me how to put my earplugs in if I can't hear? 3. What good are the EXIT signs if I can't read them because I don't know how to put my glasses on? 4. How the hell have I been managing to get out of the building all these years without a sign to tell me. 5. How about an ENTRANCE sign? If I don't know how to get out of the building without a sign then I sure as hell wouldn't know how to get in. On a previous visit, OSHA was pleased with all the signs around the shop spaces telling the uninformed that they should wear eye protection. However (there are always "howevers" when it comes to beaurocrats) they thought we might be confused when it came time to measure a part in the comparator (which is surrounded by blackout curtains). So in their infinite wisdom, they decided that we needed a sign to tell us that eye protection was NOT needed when using the comparator. This brought up a quandary for the blind as a bat crowd like me who need glasses to see. Am I required to take my glasses off to use the comparator? Or is it optional? My boss did not exhibit a sense of humor when I asked him these questions. Those Minds "Hi, I'm from the government and I'm here to help you" Usually, OSHA does not just "show up". There has to be a complaint filed by a current employee, and that means not from one that was just fired, but one that still works there. OR, there has to have been an accident with injury, or an "imminent threat to safety or health". Otherwise, the employer can refuse to allow the inspectors in. They can't just come in on fishing trips. If refused, they can usually get in later, and now have put a big red X on that file meaning "pay close attention to this idiot in the future and cite him for EVERYTHING." So, the company had to have a recent accident, or a current employee filed a report. All in all, it seems reasonable to me. There were substandard lines that could have exploded; hence ear protection. The exploding lines could have sent out fragments; hence eye protection. Maybe the inspectors thought that if the employees couldn't recognize PVC from acceptable air lines, they needed assistance in other areas, too. Cheaping out on PVC air lines is about as cheap as you can get. Steve |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
"SteveB" wrote in message news:_jypc.28996$5a.9520@okepread03... Usually, OSHA does not just "show up". There has to be a complaint filed by a current employee, and that means not from one that was just fired, but one that still works there. OR, there has to have been an accident with injury, or an "imminent threat to safety or health". Otherwise, the employer can refuse to allow the inspectors in. They can't just come in on fishing trips. If refused, they can usually get in later, and now have put a big red X on that file meaning "pay close attention to this idiot in the future and cite him for EVERYTHING." So, the company had to have a recent accident, or a current employee filed a report. All in all, it seems reasonable to me. There were substandard lines that could have exploded; hence ear protection. The exploding lines could have sent out fragments; hence eye protection. Maybe the inspectors thought that if the employees couldn't recognize PVC from acceptable air lines, they needed assistance in other areas, too. Cheaping out on PVC air lines is about as cheap as you can get. Steve No recent accidents. OSHA has been a regular visitor since we had a disgruntled employee who was fired and filed a bogus complaint about ten years ago. Management is more than willing to take suggestions from OSHA to make a safe environment. Don't get wrong here, I was just poking some fun . I take safety seriously,as does about everyone else I work with. Doubtful if I would work in a recklesly hazardous environment. Our shop is a very safe working environment. As with all places there are things that are not up to snuff. My point was to show what I thought was humorous in that they feel the need to show a person who wears glasses how to put them on. As a matter of fact The whole shop is good at wearing proper personal protective equipment. Those Minds |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
And just what do you think they would have said about copper air lines? Let
the flames commence!!! I'll never agree to anything other than black pipe! -- There are 10 kinds of people...Those that understand binary and those that don't "Those Minds" wrote in message ... Yup, they are PVC. We've had a few ruptures in the past and the owners knew that the PVC was "illegal", but kept using the excuse that the new stuff was too expensive and would fix it later. No excuses for that and should get whatever fine is necessary IMHO. Those Minds "Ian Stirling" wrote in message ... Those Minds wrote: OSHA showed up at work the other day. snip look sadder than Droopy the cartoon dog, the bottom line was that we have to change out all the air lines (explosive hazard) and get trained on how to Are these PVC? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
I am mighty sick of safety nazis. I'm not against safety, just those who
make it happen. In out plant your are trained and certified to climb a ladder, though no ladder available to us is taller than 10'. We are trained and certified to sit on a lab stool. Yep someone fell off one so all are trained and certified. The yellow safety stickers are so prevalent you can hardly see what color the machines are. The yellow stickers are to the point of being just visual noise. If we have to write an operation and maintenance manual for a new prototype machine the blank template is 29 pages long, profiled with safety information. Sometimes by the time we are done with the manual we've only added 3-4 pages of technical information. This safety stuff is way out of hand! lg no neat sig line "Those Minds" wrote in message ... "SteveB" wrote in message news:_jypc.28996$5a.9520@okepread03... Usually, OSHA does not just "show up". There has to be a complaint filed by a current employee, and that means not from one that was just fired, but one that still works there. OR, there has to have been an accident with injury, or an "imminent threat to safety or health". Otherwise, the employer can refuse to allow the inspectors in. They can't just come in on fishing trips. If refused, they can usually get in later, and now have put a big red X on that file meaning "pay close attention to this idiot in the future and cite him for EVERYTHING." So, the company had to have a recent accident, or a current employee filed a report. All in all, it seems reasonable to me. There were substandard lines that could have exploded; hence ear protection. The exploding lines could have sent out fragments; hence eye protection. Maybe the inspectors thought that if the employees couldn't recognize PVC from acceptable air lines, they needed assistance in other areas, too. Cheaping out on PVC air lines is about as cheap as you can get. Steve No recent accidents. OSHA has been a regular visitor since we had a disgruntled employee who was fired and filed a bogus complaint about ten years ago. Management is more than willing to take suggestions from OSHA to make a safe environment. Don't get wrong here, I was just poking some fun . I take safety seriously,as does about everyone else I work with. Doubtful if I would work in a recklesly hazardous environment. Our shop is a very safe working environment. As with all places there are things that are not up to snuff. My point was to show what I thought was humorous in that they feel the need to show a person who wears glasses how to put them on. As a matter of fact The whole shop is good at wearing proper personal protective equipment. Those Minds |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
"Tom Gardner" wrote in message news And just what do you think they would have said about copper air lines? Let the flames commence!!! I'll never agree to anything other than black pipe! Interesting, Tom. Any particular reason? Shouldn't fail catastrophically, but would certainly not have the rigidity of black pipe. Want to share your thoughts? Harold |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
Yeah, and this braille keyboard is a bitch too. The monitor was the tricky
part, though. RJ -- "Have no one say it, and say it to your shame, that all was well here, until YOU came." Then there's the brail on the drive up ATMs, but we won't go there.... |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
Those Minds
"Hi, I'm from the government and I'm here to help you" Usually, OSHA does not just "show up". There has to be a complaint filed by a current employee, and that means not from one that was just fired, but one that still works there. OR, there has to have been an accident with injury, Not quite...AFAIK and have been told by people I trust and who are in a postion to know, they WILL and do inspect based on former employees filing complaints. The scary/wierd thing is that if, as a FORMER employee, you may remain anonamous(or however the hell you spell it)...however, if you are a CURRENT employee and wish to file a complaint, you have to give your name AND they will give that name to the shop. Now there is nothing that says you can't TELL them you are a former employee, of course. or an "imminent threat to safety or health". Otherwise, the employer can refuse to allow the inspectors in. They can't just come in on fishing I'm real sure that I wouldn't want to be the one that told an inspector "No, you can't come in...get a warrant". One thing I do know is that if you keep them out, they will "inspect" from the parking lot and, of course, find "imminent danger" exists and shut the shop down. trips. If refused, they can usually get in later, and now have put a big red X on that file meaning "pay close attention to this idiot in the future and cite him for EVERYTHING." Mike |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
"Harold & Susan Vordos" wrote in message
... Interesting, Tom. Any particular reason? Shouldn't fail catastrophically, but would certainly not have the rigidity of black pipe. Want to share your thoughts? I think he's being sarcastic, in particular relating to that old thread about copper vs. iron vs. some PVC a few months ago. (Thank goodness we haven't had a hard-core PVC bashing here since last year.) Iron came out on top with copper trailing close in second. PVC, as one can imagine, is in the special olympics... It's concievable that if the copper is corroded, overworked (vibrations) and the pressure is high (perhaps even a shockwave somehow), it would burst. In any normal situation it'll split at worst. Tim -- "I have misplaced my pants." - Homer Simpson | Electronics, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --+ Metalcasting and Games: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
"Those Minds" wrote in message ... "SteveB" wrote in message news:_jypc.28996$5a.9520@okepread03... Usually, OSHA does not just "show up". There has to be a complaint filed by a current employee, and that means not from one that was just fired, but one that still works there. OR, there has to have been an accident with injury, or an "imminent threat to safety or health". Otherwise, the employer can refuse to allow the inspectors in. They can't just come in on fishing trips. If refused, they can usually get in later, and now have put a big red X on that file meaning "pay close attention to this idiot in the future and cite him for EVERYTHING." So, the company had to have a recent accident, or a current employee filed a report. All in all, it seems reasonable to me. There were substandard lines that could have exploded; hence ear protection. The exploding lines could have sent out fragments; hence eye protection. Maybe the inspectors thought that if the employees couldn't recognize PVC from acceptable air lines, they needed assistance in other areas, too. Cheaping out on PVC air lines is about as cheap as you can get. Steve No recent accidents. OSHA has been a regular visitor since we had a disgruntled employee who was fired and filed a bogus complaint about ten years ago. Management is more than willing to take suggestions from OSHA to make a safe environment. Don't get wrong here, I was just poking some fun . I take safety seriously,as does about everyone else I work with. Doubtful if I would work in a recklesly hazardous environment. Our shop is a very safe working environment. As with all places there are things that are not up to snuff. My point was to show what I thought was humorous in that they feel the need to show a person who wears glasses how to put them on. As a matter of fact The whole shop is good at wearing proper personal protective equipment. Those Minds OSHA, as well as the company "safety experts" can be utterly laughable at times. Some of the things they come up with is relevent and useful in saving pain and misery. And some of it looks like it was thought of by "Fire Marshall Bill". (Jim Carey character) But then, if you have worked at anything long enough, you can answer your own question, "Is there truly anyone that stupid in the world that would do such a thing as they have signs saying not to do?" And then you see one, and you know there is really someone THAT stupid. Like I said, once they put a red X on your file, it takes a while to fade. Steve |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
In article _jypc.28996$5a.9520@okepread03, SteveB says...
Usually, OSHA does not just "show up". There has to be a complaint filed by a current employee, and that means not from one that was just fired, but one that still works there. OR, there has to have been an accident with injury, or an "imminent threat to safety or health". The rules are actually very specific. There must have been a personal injury that caused more than a two-day stay in the hospital, or a death on site, that triggers an OSHA inspection on site. Under those conditions I think the inspection cannot be refused, or the worker's comp insurance gets yanked. At one job we had plenty of ER vistits for folks who tried to trim their nails with an end mill, and got it a bit too close, etc. But none of these resulted in an osha visit. Another thing that most folks don't realize is that the *size* of the shop matters a great deal. Shops with fewer than eleven employees are exempt from most of the OSHA reporting rules. Jim ================================================== please reply to: JRR(zero) at yktvmv (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com ================================================== |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
"larry g" wrote in message ... I am mighty sick of safety nazis. I'm not against safety, just those who make it happen. In out plant your are trained and certified to climb a ladder, though no ladder available to us is taller than 10'. We are trained and certified to sit on a lab stool. Yep someone fell off one so all are trained and certified. The yellow safety stickers are so prevalent you can hardly see what color the machines are. The yellow stickers are to the point of being just visual noise. If we have to write an operation and maintenance manual for a new prototype machine the blank template is 29 pages long, profiled with safety information. Sometimes by the time we are done with the manual we've only added 3-4 pages of technical information. This safety stuff is way out of hand! lg no neat sig line My favorite is when they require a fall harness when working over 6 feet high. And then the safety harness has a ten foot lanyard. When you hit the floor, you still got four feet of lanyard left! Steve |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
"The Davenports" wrote in message ... Those Minds "Hi, I'm from the government and I'm here to help you" Usually, OSHA does not just "show up". There has to be a complaint filed by a current employee, and that means not from one that was just fired, but one that still works there. OR, there has to have been an accident with injury, Not quite...AFAIK and have been told by people I trust and who are in a postion to know, they WILL and do inspect based on former employees filing complaints. The scary/wierd thing is that if, as a FORMER employee, you may remain anonamous(or however the hell you spell it)...however, if you are a CURRENT employee and wish to file a complaint, you have to give your name AND they will give that name to the shop. Now there is nothing that says you can't TELL them you are a former employee, of course. or an "imminent threat to safety or health". Otherwise, the employer can refuse to allow the inspectors in. They can't just come in on fishing I'm real sure that I wouldn't want to be the one that told an inspector "No, you can't come in...get a warrant". One thing I do know is that if you keep them out, they will "inspect" from the parking lot and, of course, find "imminent danger" exists and shut the shop down. trips. If refused, they can usually get in later, and now have put a big red X on that file meaning "pay close attention to this idiot in the future and cite him for EVERYTHING." Mike I am citing from safety schooling I took in the nineties. It changes with the wind, so today it is probably different. Steve |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
OSHA .... just another wart on the asshole of progress.
JLZ "Anthony" wrote in message ... "Those Minds" wrote in : OSHA showed up at work the other day. Oh joy, oh joy, another reason to get the boss paranoid. After the grand tour and filling out reams of papers and causing the boss to look sadder than Droopy the cartoon dog, the bottom line was that we have to change out all the air lines (explosive hazard) and get trained on how to put on safety glasses and how to insert earplugs into our ears. In addition, we have to put up "exit" signs. If the air lines are PVC, I agree with OSHA. Plastic can become brittle in the presence of certian oils and other chemicals. You are possibly looking at hundreds of little shards of very sharp plastic being shot out much like a anti-personnel round should the line rupture. This brought up a few questions in my mind: 1. If I don't know how to put my glasses on, how are they going to train me? They can't give me written instructions because I can't read (blind or visually impaired; take your pick) without glasses. They can't give me verbal instructions because I obviously don't know how to wear earplugs and after 12 years of working there I must be deaf (hearing impaired for the politically correct crowd) . I realize the fun you are poking here, but honestly, you would be suprised at the number of folks who don't understand proper eye protection. This includes side shields. I've had eye damage from chips before, not fun....at all....I work with a fella who lost an eye from improperly wearing his safety glasses. Unfortunately, I've seen several people hurt in an industrial environment, as probably many people here have. Fortunately, i've kept all my important body parts out of danger, only minor accidents, but some people aren't so lucky. *MOST* of the time, the employee was doing something unsafe at the time of the accident (operator disabled safety device, bypassed safety device, climbing without a ladder, reaching into moving machinery, etc) There have been instances where equipment failed, causing injury, but those are very rare compared to the previous reason. It can not only cost you some body part...it can cost you your life, I've see one of those in my lifetime, and I hope I never see another. (Operator disabled one safety device and bypassed another - it cost him his life.) 2. How are they going to tell me how to put my earplugs in if I can't hear? 3. What good are the EXIT signs if I can't read them because I don't know how to put my glasses on? 4. How the hell have I been managing to get out of the building all these years without a sign to tell me. Those are lighted, battery backup emergency lights. Should the power fail, a fire where smoke is thick, or other emergency arise, those lights stay on. -- Anthony You can't 'idiot proof' anything....every time you try, they just make better idiots. Remove sp to reply via email --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free...... Dam straight..We are wearing our protection ! Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.679 / Virus Database: 441 - Release Date: 5/9/04 |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
"jim rozen" wrote in message ... In article _jypc.28996$5a.9520@okepread03, SteveB says... The rules are actually very specific. There must have been a personal injury that caused more than a two-day stay in the hospital, or a death on site, that triggers an OSHA inspection on site. Under those conditions I think the inspection cannot be refused, or the worker's comp insurance gets yanked. Snipping occured Jim In the 12 years working there, there have been three injuries requiring ER visits. No one has had to stay in the hospital. Stitches were the only thing required. Those Minds |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
I just don't know to be honest. Something in the back of my mind just won't
accept it. I might accept copper for a home shop but I've had to repair too many black pipes from abuse to think copper would ever do. In the back of my mind, I think that the black pipe helps support the roof! At least I know about my blinders and hired Roger as a consultant just to "look" at things with new eye balls. -- "Harold & Susan Vordos" wrote in message ... "Tom Gardner" wrote in message news And just what do you think they would have said about copper air lines? Let the flames commence!!! I'll never agree to anything other than black pipe! Interesting, Tom. Any particular reason? Shouldn't fail catastrophically, but would certainly not have the rigidity of black pipe. Want to share your thoughts? Harold |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
"Tom Gardner" wrote in message . com... I just don't know to be honest. Something in the back of my mind just won't accept it. I might accept copper for a home shop but I've had to repair too many black pipes from abuse to think copper would ever do. In the back of my mind, I think that the black pipe helps support the roof! At least I know about my blinders and hired Roger as a consultant just to "look" at things with new eye balls. Good enough for me, Tom. I think all of us have things that we believe in, and things we don't. I thought maybe in this case you knew something that had gotten past me. Thanks, Harold |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
jim rozen wrote: In article , Those Minds says... My boss did not exhibit a sense of humor when I asked him these questions. Odd, they *never* do. Indeed I have found that repeated questionings like that can lead to a rapid exit from the employement! Ahh, that explains how to exit the building when he can't read the exit signs! Jon |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
In the training by OSHA reps that I have had, there are at least two kinds
of Osha officers. Training officers, which he was, and compliance officers, who carry badges. He said if you stall a compliance officer longer than 15 minutes or so in the lobby, he will leave and come back with a deputy and a warrant to enter the premises. If they are there to examine your air compressors, for example, you can leave the lobby and go around the outside of the building to show them to the officer. If you go through the building, or pass anything that catches his eye, he is required to address infractions as he sees them. Apparently, they do not always do generalized inspections. In the installation of a new roof on the factory, an officer showed up at the base of the ladder and wanted to talk to the roofing contractor about his lack of perimeter roping. I was on the roof. He was not interested in any other functions going on relative to the factory itself. The inspector told them that a rival roofing contractor told him about it, and physically lead him to the jobsite. Ain't that chicken****? The training officer also told us that a backhoe working in sight of the highway was an OSHA MAGNET. Personal cave-in protection for the pit worker must often go lacking. RJ -- "Have no one say it, and say it to your shame, that all was well here, until YOU came." "The Davenports" wrote in message ... Those Minds "Hi, I'm from the government and I'm here to help you" Usually, OSHA does not just "show up". There has to be a complaint filed by a current employee, and that means not from one that was just fired, but one that still works there. OR, there has to have been an accident with injury, Not quite...AFAIK and have been told by people I trust and who are in a postion to know, they WILL and do inspect based on former employees filing complaints. The scary/wierd thing is that if, as a FORMER employee, you may remain anonamous(or however the hell you spell it)...however, if you are a CURRENT employee and wish to file a complaint, you have to give your name AND they will give that name to the shop. Now there is nothing that says you can't TELL them you are a former employee, of course. or an "imminent threat to safety or health". Otherwise, the employer can refuse to allow the inspectors in. They can't just come in on fishing I'm real sure that I wouldn't want to be the one that told an inspector "No, you can't come in...get a warrant". One thing I do know is that if you keep them out, they will "inspect" from the parking lot and, of course, find "imminent danger" exists and shut the shop down. trips. If refused, they can usually get in later, and now have put a big red X on that file meaning "pay close attention to this idiot in the future and cite him for EVERYTHING." Mike |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
Once had a Cal Osha guy show up at our sign shop and start looking for
violations. Only thing he could find was a few loose lids on LATEX paint cans. He said they were emitting volatile organic compounds. I told him that made no sense at all because as soon as I apply the paint to those sign blanks it is going to emit exactly all of the VOCs so am I not able to paint anything again? He gave me a blank stare like he I had just asked him a trick question and just left the building. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
On Sat, 15 May 2004 11:12:41 -0700, "Those Minds"
wrote: On a previous visit, OSHA was pleased with all the signs around the shop spaces telling the uninformed that they should wear eye protection. See? You guys were TOO safe so the inspector had to invent more hoops for you to jump through to justify his existence. And we wonder why companies pull up stakes and move to China. Rob =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rob Skinner La Habra, California www.rustyiron.com |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
In article , Those Minds says...
In the 12 years working there, there have been three injuries requiring ER visits. No one has had to stay in the hospital. Stitches were the only thing required. If there was no two-night stay then those events would not automatically trigger an osha investigation, according to the rules as I understand them. Jim ================================================== please reply to: JRR(zero) at yktvmv (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com ================================================== |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
We may be referring to different entities. I am in Oregon, under the perview
of OR-OSHA. My understanding (and I may be wong) is that the individual states comply with the Fed's regulations and add more at will but may not subtract. I have'nt heard of a provision of a minimum hospital stay before they can show up. Those Minds "jim rozen" wrote in message ... In article , Those Minds says... In the 12 years working there, there have been three injuries requiring ER visits. No one has had to stay in the hospital. Stitches were the only thing required. If there was no two-night stay then those events would not automatically trigger an osha investigation, according to the rules as I understand them. Jim ================================================== please reply to: JRR(zero) at yktvmv (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com ================================================== |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
In article , Those Minds says...
We may be referring to different entities. I am in Oregon, under the perview of OR-OSHA. My understanding (and I may be wong) is that the individual states comply with the Fed's regulations and add more at will but may not subtract. I have'nt heard of a provision of a minimum hospital stay before they can show up. The comments I made were specifically referenced to NY. My suspicion is that a) NY has some of the more liberal approaches to this stuff, and that b) OSHA, being a federal agency, probably has its rules standardized across the states. Again, the comment was that the two night hospital stay was what was required before they were *required* by their own internal osha regulations to appear and inspect the worksite. That or a death. I think there's always the chance they might do so for a lesser event - thought given the state of OSHA funding right now this is highly unlikely. Jim ================================================== please reply to: JRR(zero) at yktvmv (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com ================================================== |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
"Anthony" wrote in message ... I realize the fun you are poking here, but honestly, you would be suprised at the number of folks who don't understand proper eye protection. A law was recently passed in Canada (bill C-45) that if a co-worker is injured and you knew about the safety infraction and didn't do anything, you can be held criminally liable. Granted, hard to nail someone for that, but... In the two shops I currently work in, you wear safety glasses and safety boots 100% of the time. If you don't have them or won't wear them, you go home or you're fired. Regards, Robin |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
"Robin S." wrote in message .. . "Anthony" wrote in message ... I realize the fun you are poking here, but honestly, you would be suprised at the number of folks who don't understand proper eye protection. A law was recently passed in Canada (bill C-45) that if a co-worker is injured and you knew about the safety infraction and didn't do anything, you can be held criminally liable. Granted, hard to nail someone for that, but... In the two shops I currently work in, you wear safety glasses and safety boots 100% of the time. If you don't have them or won't wear them, you go home or you're fired. Regards, Robin And if you go blind, they send you home, too. ;-) Steve |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
"Backlash" wrote in
: In the training by OSHA reps that I have had, there are at least two kinds of Osha officers. Training officers, which he was, and compliance officers, who carry badges. He said if you stall a compliance officer longer than 15 minutes or so in the lobby, he will leave and come back with a deputy and a warrant to enter the premises. If they are there to examine your air compressors, for example, you can leave the lobby and go around the outside of the building to show them to the officer. If you go through the building, or pass anything that catches his eye, he is required to address infractions as he sees them. Apparently, they do not always do generalized inspections. In the installation of a new roof on the factory, an officer showed up at the base of the ladder and wanted to talk to the roofing contractor about his lack of perimeter roping. I was on the roof. He was not interested in any other functions going on relative to the factory itself. The inspector told them that a rival roofing contractor told him about it, and physically lead him to the jobsite. Ain't that chicken****? The training officer also told us that a backhoe working in sight of the highway was an OSHA MAGNET. Personal cave-in protection for the pit worker must often go lacking. RJ Just had a man killed locally Friday in a trench cave-in. Another man in the ditch survived, but with a dislocated leg and other injuries. It took 5 hours to get the survivor out. Installing a sewer line, and I bet there was no cage in the ditch either, although the paper never said one way or another. -- Anthony You can't 'idiot proof' anything....every time you try, they just make better idiots. Remove sp to reply via email |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
OSHA
"Siggy" wrote in message . .. Although I completely agree that OSHA is generally a bit overbearing, the sad truth is that if an accident were to occur and the cause be found to be one of these items that OSHA advised to clean up, guess who would lose their ass in the resulting lawsuit. My office has joined in a voluntary program from OSHA called STAR where we ask OSHA to come in and give us suggestions on what needs fixing and they do so with the agreement that they can't impose fines or penalties. That way, we get to claim OSHA compliance and we don't have the risk of racking up big fines from a surprise inspection visit. That's a very good program and it even makes sense. What was the last time any thing the government did make any sense? You are absolutely right about what happens after an accident. It can cost millions. Not only will the company get sued; OSHA will come in and put some heavy fines on the company. I don't know how it works but every time there is an accident OHSA is informed and they swoop down on the company looking for any violation. My local scrap dealer had an employee that lost his arm in a scrap shredder. It cost him a fortune. The only good to come out of it was that the scrap dealer was a complete A-hole and it was great to see someone stick it to him. The bad thing that came out of it, besides the guy losing his arm, is that all my local scrap dealers are now paranoid about being sued and they won't let anyone in to pick through the scrap piles looking for good stuff. One of my great pleasures in life is taking a piece of junk and doing something useful with it. Scp |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lawyers, OSHA & Attic Ladders | Metalworking | |||
Every wanted to see a Chinese production facility? | Metalworking | |||
Rant: Lawyers, OSHA & Attic Ladders | Metalworking |