http://www.myie2.com/html_en/home.htm

Ive been running it for a couple days, and it works rather nicely.

Gunner

No 220-pound thug can threaten the well-being or dignity of a 110-pound
woman who has two pounds of iron to even things out. Is that evil?
Is that wrong? People who object to weapons aren't abolishing violence,
they're begging for the rule of brute force, when the biggest, strongest
animals among men were always automatically "right". Guns end that,
and social democracy is a hollow farce without an armed populace to make
it work.
- L. Neil Smith

Gunner wrote:

http://www.myie2.com/html_en/home.htm

Ive been running it for a couple days, and it works rather nicely.

Gunner

No 220-pound thug can threaten the well-being or dignity of a 110-pound
woman who has two pounds of iron to even things out. Is that evil?
Is that wrong? People who object to weapons aren't abolishing violence,
they're begging for the rule of brute force, when the biggest, strongest
animals among men were always automatically "right". Guns end that,
and social democracy is a hollow farce without an armed populace to make
it work.
- L. Neil Smith


kinda looks like IE wants to imitate Opera

On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:21:43 -0400, screedmonkey
wrote:

Gunner wrote:

http://www.myie2.com/html_en/home.htm

Ive been running it for a couple days, and it works rather nicely.

Gunner

No 220-pound thug can threaten the well-being or dignity of a 110-pound
woman who has two pounds of iron to even things out. Is that evil?
Is that wrong? People who object to weapons aren't abolishing violence,
they're begging for the rule of brute force, when the biggest, strongest
animals among men were always automatically "right". Guns end that,
and social democracy is a hollow farce without an armed populace to make
it work.
- L. Neil Smith


kinda looks like IE wants to imitate Opera

Ayup. And so far..works pretty good.

Gunner

"A vote for Kerry is a de facto vote for bin Laden."
Strider

On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:32:50 -0700, Bart Bailey
vaguely proposed a theory
.......and in reply I say!:
remove ns from my header address to reply via email

Excpe that I could not get it to repons to the address entry bar at
all. In facxt it sent/received data, and got me nowhere......... ????

In posted on
Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:11:40 GMT, Gunner wrote:

http://www.myie2.com/html_en/home.htm

Ive been running it for a couple days, and it works rather nicely.

************************************************** **
The Met Bureau is LOVE!

In article ,
Old Nick wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:32:50 -0700, Bart Bailey
vaguely proposed a theory
......and in reply I say!:
remove ns from my header address to reply via email

Excpe that I could not get it to repons to the address entry bar at
all. In facxt it sent/received data, and got me nowhere......... ????

In posted on
Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:11:40 GMT, Gunner wrote:

http://www.myie2.com/html_en/home.htm

Hmm ... interesting. a nslookup shows the following:

izalco:dnichols 0:57 nslookup www.myie2.com
Server: popocat.d-and-d.com
Address: 204.91.85.9

Name: www10.iwi.com.sg
Address: 203.116.15.66
Aliases: www.myie2.com

Which says that they are located in Singapore.

Ive been running it for a couple days, and it works rather nicely.

I wandered through the web site, and found absolutely *nothing*
which says which OS it works under, by which I assume that it only works
under Windows -- at least so far. :-)

That "mouse gestures" feature looks nice.

Enjoy,
DoN.
--
Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564
(too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html
--- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero ---

On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:11:40 GMT, Gunner
wrote:

http://www.myie2.com/html_en/home.htm

Ive been running it for a couple days, and it works rather nicely.

I looked at it - no uninstall included - no go.

Even if IE is put out by the Evil Empire, it seems to work
OK for me. I have Pop-Up Stopper, which handles most of my
"issues."

--
Robert Sturgeon,
proud member of the vast right wing conspiracy
and the evil gun culture.
http://www.vistech.net/users/rsturge/

On 29 Apr 2004 01:08:39 -0400, (DoN. Nichols)
brought forth from the murky depths:
-snip-
Which says that they are located in Singapore.

It runs that quickly, too, as if it goes out to Singapore to
fetch each request. S L O W . I don't see the benefits.


Ive been running it for a couple days, and it works rather nicely.

I wandered through the web site, and found absolutely *nothing*
which says which OS it works under, by which I assume that it only works
under Windows -- at least so far. :-)

That "mouse gestures" feature looks nice.

For those of you who uninstall it, you'll have to separately uninstall
(search out and nuke) the Robowhatzit.


================================================== ============
Like peace and quiet? Buy a phoneless cord.
http://www/diversify.com/stees.html Hilarious T-shirts online
================================================== ============

Gunner wrote:

http://www.myie2.com/html_en/home.htm

Ive been running it for a couple days, and it works rather nicely.


Often discussed and praised in alt.comp.freeware and listed as
"Pricelessware" (freeware that has been put through the wringer and
passed).

http://www.pricelessware.org/2003/PL2003SHELL.htm#A504

It's actually an IE "skin", mods to the IE engine, making it what IE
should have been to start with.

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 06:17:03 -0700, Larry Jaques
vaguely proposed a theory
.......and in reply I say!:
remove ns from my header address to reply via email

On 29 Apr 2004 01:08:39 -0400, (DoN. Nichols)
brought forth from the murky depths:
-snip-
Which says that they are located in Singapore.

It runs that quickly, too, as if it goes out to Singapore to
fetch each request. S L O W . I don't see the benefits.

......and I see possible dangers? I saw a lot of net activity with no
results when I tried use the address entry box.

For those of you who uninstall it, you'll have to separately uninstall
(search out and nuke) the Robowhatzit.

Ok. Thanks
************************************************** **
The Met Bureau is LOVE!

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:42:37 -0700, Bart Bailey
vaguely proposed a theory
.......and in reply I say!:
remove ns from my header address to reply via email

Well if it bothers you that much, then get a life?

My POINT is that the damned thing does not work for me. I in fact
treat it with suspicion.

Wish me luck elsewhere.

I'm being quoted and replied to, yet there isn't any of my post
included. Is this the puzzle of the week, a Buddhist Koan, or just
clumsy attributing?

************************************************** **
The Met Bureau is LOVE!

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 06:17:03 -0700, Larry Jaques
vaguely proposed a theory
.......and in reply I say!:
remove ns from my header address to reply via email


For those of you who uninstall it, you'll have to separately uninstall
(search out and nuke) the Robowhatzit.


......and I now have to reassign my html files to my old browser.

I find this a little aggressive. It's "free". It's slow. It sends info
and does nothing. My firewal says "give it free reign?" (as you would
to a browser) and I think hmmm....

Colour me paranoid.
************************************************** **
The Met Bureau is LOVE!

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 06:17:03 -0700, Larry Jaques
vaguely proposed a theory
.......and in reply I say!:
remove ns from my header address to reply via email

Larry

Could you be a little more specific, please?

For those of you who uninstall it, you'll have to separately uninstall
(search out and nuke) the Robowhatzit.

************************************************** **
The Met Bureau is LOVE!

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 01:00:20 GMT, Old Nick
wrote:

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 06:17:03 -0700, Larry Jaques
vaguely proposed a theory
......and in reply I say!:
remove ns from my header address to reply via email


For those of you who uninstall it, you'll have to separately uninstall
(search out and nuke) the Robowhatzit.


.....and I now have to reassign my html files to my old browser.

I find this a little aggressive. It's "free". It's slow. It sends info
and does nothing. My firewal says "give it free reign?" (as you would
to a browser) and I think hmmm....

Colour me paranoid.
************************************************* ***
The Met Bureau is LOVE!

Slow???? Its one of the fasted browsers Ive used to date..and Ive used
them all. No blinky lights when Im not doing anything, everything was
seamless and I still can use IE if I want, plus it transerfed my IE book
marks and cookies perfectly.

Gunner

"A vote for Kerry is a de facto vote for bin Laden."
Strider

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 01:00:20 GMT, Old Nick
brought forth from the murky depths:

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 06:17:03 -0700, Larry Jaques
vaguely proposed a theory
......and in reply I say!:
remove ns from my header address to reply via email


For those of you who uninstall it, you'll have to separately uninstall
(search out and nuke) the Robowhatzit.


.....and I now have to reassign my html files to my old browser.

I didn't let myIE2 modify many of those extensions. I wish


I find this a little aggressive. It's "free". It's slow. It sends info
and does nothing. My firewal says "give it free reign?" (as you would
to a browser) and I think hmmm....

Colour me paranoid.

Ditto that.

Since RoboForm didn't uninstall with the other program and didn't
go through a normal install, I had to find it in the Program Files
under "Siber" (?, from memory) and use the "unsafe" x-iconed thingy
to remove it. It then opened Netscape and asked me why I was
uninstalling it.

I gave it a test after nuking NN's cache and NN took half the time
to load a test site. Too many unnecessary bells and whistles, the
same bloat IE suffers from. I long for the good old days when
NN 4.09 ruled the Earth... My favorite feature of all browsers
is the bookmark file, which 4.09 had down PAT! IE would suck
MUCH less if it did bookmarks like that.


================================================== ============
Like peace and quiet? Buy a phoneless cord.
http://www/diversify.com/stees.html Hilarious T-shirts online
================================================== ============

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:17:00 -0700, Larry Jaques
vaguely proposed a theory
.......and in reply I say!:
remove ns from my header address to reply via email

OK. Thanks. I'll check it out.

.....and I now have to reassign my html files to my old browser.

I didn't let myIE2 modify many of those extensions. I wish

I don't remember it _asking_!

Colour me paranoid.

Ditto that.

Since RoboForm didn't uninstall with the other program and didn't
go through a normal install, I had to find it in the Program Files

************************************************** **
The Met Bureau is LOVE!

Larry Jaques wrote:

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 01:00:20 GMT, Old Nick
brought forth from the murky depths:

On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 06:17:03 -0700, Larry Jaques
vaguely proposed a theory
......and in reply I say!:
remove ns from my header address to reply via email


For those of you who uninstall it, you'll have to separately uninstall
(search out and nuke) the Robowhatzit.


.....and I now have to reassign my html files to my old browser.

I didn't let myIE2 modify many of those extensions. I wish

I find this a little aggressive. It's "free". It's slow. It sends info
and does nothing. My firewal says "give it free reign?" (as you would
to a browser) and I think hmmm....

Colour me paranoid.

Ditto that.

Since RoboForm didn't uninstall with the other program and didn't
go through a normal install, I had to find it in the Program Files
under "Siber" (?, from memory) and use the "unsafe" x-iconed thingy
to remove it. It then opened Netscape and asked me why I was
uninstalling it.

I gave it a test after nuking NN's cache and NN took half the time
to load a test site. Too many unnecessary bells and whistles, the
same bloat IE suffers from. I long for the good old days when
NN 4.09 ruled the Earth... My favorite feature of all browsers
is the bookmark file, which 4.09 had down PAT! IE would suck
MUCH less if it did bookmarks like that.


I'm with you. Only use InternetExplosion when I have no choice. I'm using
4.79, but heck, I was quite happy with 3.xx. IE has *always* sucked. The
*developers* make something glitter, sparkle, ring, bounce, or blink, and it
is heralded as the latest *upgrade*. Bull****.

michael

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 00:42:17 -0700, michael
vaguely proposed a theory
.......and in reply I say!:
remove ns from my header address to reply via email


I'm with you. Only use InternetExplosion when I have no choice.

What else do you use otherwise?
************************************************** **
The Met Bureau is LOVE!

Old Nick wrote:

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 00:42:17 -0700, michael
vaguely proposed a theory
......and in reply I say!:
remove ns from my header address to reply via email

I'm with you. Only use InternetExplosion when I have no choice.

What else do you use otherwise?
************************************************** **
The Met Bureau is LOVE!

Netscape, of course!

mj