"Billy" wrote in message
...
I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store said
they
would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft. What
is
so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so much
more
expensive?


cost of product

In article ,
said...

"Billy" wrote in message
...
I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store said
they
would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft. What
is
so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so much
more
expensive?

cost of product

I think he was talking about only the installation cost.

In article ,
said...

"Billy" wrote in message
...
I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store said
they
would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft. What
is
so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so much
more
expensive?

cost of product

I think he was talking about only the installation cost.

That is correct, installation cost is what I don't understand. The marble
product is obviously more expensive than ceramic, but I don't understand why
the *installation* price is so much greater for installing marble vs.
ceramic. How does the installation process differ?

"Brad" wrote in message
news:MPG.198f2e81bdba47a198b54d@news...
In article ,
said...

"Billy" wrote in message
...
I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store
said
they
would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft.
What
is
so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so
much
more
expensive?

cost of product

I think he was talking about only the installation cost.

That is correct, installation cost is what I don't understand. The marble
product is obviously more expensive than ceramic, but I don't understand why
the *installation* price is so much greater for installing marble vs.
ceramic. How does the installation process differ?

"Brad" wrote in message
news:MPG.198f2e81bdba47a198b54d@news...
In article ,
said...

"Billy" wrote in message
...
I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store
said
they
would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft.
What
is
so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so
much
more
expensive?

cost of product

I think he was talking about only the installation cost.

These prices reflect the total cost for the job, material AND installation,
and are fairly standard. Both products are usually installed by competent
setters in a similar fashion, that is thinset mortar over a suitable
substrate. Ceramic tiles may however, and are commonly set using mastic
instead of mortar. The installation of marble is often easier for the
tilesetter, as the tiles are often a full 12" square, thus many fewer pieces
to work with, hence many fewer cuts.


"Billy" wrote in message
...
I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store said
they
would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft. What
is
so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so much
more
expensive?

These prices reflect the total cost for the job, material AND installation,
and are fairly standard. Both products are usually installed by competent
setters in a similar fashion, that is thinset mortar over a suitable
substrate. Ceramic tiles may however, and are commonly set using mastic
instead of mortar. The installation of marble is often easier for the
tilesetter, as the tiles are often a full 12" square, thus many fewer pieces
to work with, hence many fewer cuts.


"Billy" wrote in message
...
I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store said
they
would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft. What
is
so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so much
more
expensive?

On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:31:31 -0700, Billy wrote:

That is correct, installation cost is what I don't understand. The
marble product is obviously more expensive than ceramic, but I don't
understand why the *installation* price is so much greater for
installing marble vs. ceramic. How does the installation process differ?

"Brad" wrote in message
news:MPG.198f2e81bdba47a198b54d@news...
In article ,
said...

"Billy" wrote in message
...
I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store
said
they
would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft.
What
is
so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so


The thinset for marble and granite is a special flexable mix that costs
four to five times as much. If this accounts for the full difference
I don't know. My granite is still waiting for me to get my kitchen
counters installed, counter are wating on the cabinets, cabinets
are waiting on the floor, floor is waiting on the wiring, wiring
is waiting on .... Yey, demolishion is almost done.

Richard "Don't know, not there yet" Kaiser

On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:31:31 -0700, Billy wrote:

That is correct, installation cost is what I don't understand. The
marble product is obviously more expensive than ceramic, but I don't
understand why the *installation* price is so much greater for
installing marble vs. ceramic. How does the installation process differ?

"Brad" wrote in message
news:MPG.198f2e81bdba47a198b54d@news...
In article ,
said...

"Billy" wrote in message
...
I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store
said
they
would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft.
What
is
so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so


The thinset for marble and granite is a special flexable mix that costs
four to five times as much. If this accounts for the full difference
I don't know. My granite is still waiting for me to get my kitchen
counters installed, counter are wating on the cabinets, cabinets
are waiting on the floor, floor is waiting on the wiring, wiring
is waiting on .... Yey, demolishion is almost done.

Richard "Don't know, not there yet" Kaiser

Tim Davis wrote:

These prices reflect the total cost for the job, material AND installation,
and are fairly standard. Both products are usually installed by competent
setters in a similar fashion, that is thinset mortar over a suitable
substrate. Ceramic tiles may however, and are commonly set using mastic
instead of mortar. The installation of marble is often easier for the
tilesetter, as the tiles are often a full 12" square, thus many fewer pieces
to work with, hence many fewer cuts.



Oh shut the **** up you top-posting imbecile. Pros do not, nor
recommend using tile mastic for floor tile installation and if marble is
set properly with a tight joint, over a 'fresh' mortar bed, using pure
cement and beat in it's far more work than slapping floor tile down over
a slab or backerboard using a standard 3/16" joint.

Your advice sucks.

Tim Davis wrote:

These prices reflect the total cost for the job, material AND installation,
and are fairly standard. Both products are usually installed by competent
setters in a similar fashion, that is thinset mortar over a suitable
substrate. Ceramic tiles may however, and are commonly set using mastic
instead of mortar. The installation of marble is often easier for the
tilesetter, as the tiles are often a full 12" square, thus many fewer pieces
to work with, hence many fewer cuts.



Oh shut the **** up you top-posting imbecile. Pros do not, nor
recommend using tile mastic for floor tile installation and if marble is
set properly with a tight joint, over a 'fresh' mortar bed, using pure
cement and beat in it's far more work than slapping floor tile down over
a slab or backerboard using a standard 3/16" joint.

Your advice sucks.

Billy wrote:

That is correct, installation cost is what I don't understand. The marble
product is obviously more expensive than ceramic, but I don't understand why
the *installation* price is so much greater for installing marble vs.
ceramic. How does the installation process differ?

"Brad" wrote in message
news:MPG.198f2e81bdba47a198b54d@news...

In article ,
said...

"Billy" wrote in message
...

I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store

said

they

would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft.

What

is

so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so

much

more

expensive?

cost of product

I think he was talking about only the installation cost.




Next time you post make yourself clear moron. And quit top posting.
Look at ****ing mess you've made. Meantime ask the g'damned installer
why it's so much higher. Or go back and read Fred Martin's posts.

It's obvious they're doing something with the substrate. Probably the
mortar like Fred already told you. Plus you give no specs as to room
shape, size or anything else.

Billy wrote:

That is correct, installation cost is what I don't understand. The marble
product is obviously more expensive than ceramic, but I don't understand why
the *installation* price is so much greater for installing marble vs.
ceramic. How does the installation process differ?

"Brad" wrote in message
news:MPG.198f2e81bdba47a198b54d@news...

In article ,
said...

"Billy" wrote in message
...

I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store

said

they

would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft.

What

is

so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so

much

more

expensive?

cost of product

I think he was talking about only the installation cost.




Next time you post make yourself clear moron. And quit top posting.
Look at ****ing mess you've made. Meantime ask the g'damned installer
why it's so much higher. Or go back and read Fred Martin's posts.

It's obvious they're doing something with the substrate. Probably the
mortar like Fred already told you. Plus you give no specs as to room
shape, size or anything else.

I am so hurt, Ass-Mos, by your scathing criticism.


"Amos" wrote in message
...
Tim Davis wrote:

These prices reflect the total cost for the job, material AND
installation,
and are fairly standard. Both products are usually installed by
competent
setters in a similar fashion, that is thinset mortar over a suitable
substrate. Ceramic tiles may however, and are commonly set using mastic
instead of mortar. The installation of marble is often easier for the
tilesetter, as the tiles are often a full 12" square, thus many fewer
pieces
to work with, hence many fewer cuts.



Oh shut the **** up you top-posting imbecile. Pros do not, nor
recommend using tile mastic for floor tile installation and if marble is
set properly with a tight joint, over a 'fresh' mortar bed, using pure
cement and beat in it's far more work than slapping floor tile down over
a slab or backerboard using a standard 3/16" joint.

Your advice sucks.

========= WAS CANCELLED BY =======:
Path:
newsengine.sol.net!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.a
c.jp!news.cn99.com!not-for-mail
From: (Amos)
Newsgroups: alt.home.repair
Subject: cmsg cancel
Control: cancel
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:36:27 -0400
Organization: Bentium Ltd. (CN99)
Lines: 1
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: 61.159.235.36
X-Trace: mail.cn99.com 1059489338 2923 61.159.235.36 (29 Jul 2003 14:35:38
GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:35:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243

cancel

I am so hurt, Ass-Mos, by your scathing criticism.


"Amos" wrote in message
...
Tim Davis wrote:

These prices reflect the total cost for the job, material AND
installation,
and are fairly standard. Both products are usually installed by
competent
setters in a similar fashion, that is thinset mortar over a suitable
substrate. Ceramic tiles may however, and are commonly set using mastic
instead of mortar. The installation of marble is often easier for the
tilesetter, as the tiles are often a full 12" square, thus many fewer
pieces
to work with, hence many fewer cuts.



Oh shut the **** up you top-posting imbecile. Pros do not, nor
recommend using tile mastic for floor tile installation and if marble is
set properly with a tight joint, over a 'fresh' mortar bed, using pure
cement and beat in it's far more work than slapping floor tile down over
a slab or backerboard using a standard 3/16" joint.

Your advice sucks.

========= WAS CANCELLED BY =======:
Path:
newsengine.sol.net!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.a
c.jp!news.cn99.com!not-for-mail
From: (Amos)
Newsgroups: alt.home.repair
Subject: cmsg cancel
Control: cancel
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:36:27 -0400
Organization: Bentium Ltd. (CN99)
Lines: 1
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: 61.159.235.36
X-Trace: mail.cn99.com 1059489338 2923 61.159.235.36 (29 Jul 2003 14:35:38
GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:35:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243

cancel

Tim Davis wrote:

I am so hurt, Ass-Mos, by your scathing criticism.



And well you should be.. Take your sorry-assed 25 year off and on
(mostly off and probably ****ed up) tile exp. and hit the road. People
come here for correct advice. Not some Podunk AR bull**** that
wannabe's like you spew..

Tim Davis wrote:

I am so hurt, Ass-Mos, by your scathing criticism.



And well you should be.. Take your sorry-assed 25 year off and on
(mostly off and probably ****ed up) tile exp. and hit the road. People
come here for correct advice. Not some Podunk AR bull**** that
wannabe's like you spew..