I am so hurt, Ass-Mos, by your scathing criticism.


"Amos" wrote in message
...
Tim Davis wrote:

These prices reflect the total cost for the job, material AND
installation,
and are fairly standard. Both products are usually installed by
competent
setters in a similar fashion, that is thinset mortar over a suitable
substrate. Ceramic tiles may however, and are commonly set using mastic
instead of mortar. The installation of marble is often easier for the
tilesetter, as the tiles are often a full 12" square, thus many fewer
pieces
to work with, hence many fewer cuts.



Oh shut the **** up you top-posting imbecile. Pros do not, nor
recommend using tile mastic for floor tile installation and if marble is
set properly with a tight joint, over a 'fresh' mortar bed, using pure
cement and beat in it's far more work than slapping floor tile down over
a slab or backerboard using a standard 3/16" joint.

Your advice sucks.

========= WAS CANCELLED BY =======:
Path:
newsengine.sol.net!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.a
c.jp!news.cn99.com!not-for-mail
From: (Amos)
Newsgroups: alt.home.repair
Subject: cmsg cancel
Control: cancel
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:36:27 -0400
Organization: Bentium Ltd. (CN99)
Lines: 1
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: 61.159.235.36
X-Trace: mail.cn99.com 1059489338 2923 61.159.235.36 (29 Jul 2003 14:35:38
GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:35:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243

cancel