DIYbanter

DIYbanter (https://www.diybanter.com/)
-   Home Repair (https://www.diybanter.com/home-repair/)
-   -   Installation - Ceramaic Tile vs. Marble (https://www.diybanter.com/home-repair/47912-re-installation-ceramaic-tile-vs-marble.html)

Charlie Spitzer July 28th 03 06:47 PM

Installation - Ceramaic Tile vs. Marble
 

"Billy" wrote in message
...
I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store said

they
would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft. What

is
so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so much

more
expensive?


cost of product



Brad July 28th 03 06:59 PM

Installation - Ceramaic Tile vs. Marble
 
In article ,
said...

"Billy" wrote in message
...
I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store said

they
would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft. What

is
so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so much

more
expensive?


cost of product


I think he was talking about only the installation cost.

Brad July 28th 03 06:59 PM

Installation - Ceramaic Tile vs. Marble
 
In article ,
said...

"Billy" wrote in message
...
I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store said

they
would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft. What

is
so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so much

more
expensive?


cost of product


I think he was talking about only the installation cost.

Billy July 29th 03 01:31 AM

Installation - Ceramaic Tile vs. Marble
 
That is correct, installation cost is what I don't understand. The marble
product is obviously more expensive than ceramic, but I don't understand why
the *installation* price is so much greater for installing marble vs.
ceramic. How does the installation process differ?

"Brad" wrote in message
news:MPG.198f2e81bdba47a198b54d@news...
In article ,
said...

"Billy" wrote in message
...
I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store

said
they
would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft.

What
is
so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so

much
more
expensive?


cost of product


I think he was talking about only the installation cost.




Billy July 29th 03 01:31 AM

Installation - Ceramaic Tile vs. Marble
 
That is correct, installation cost is what I don't understand. The marble
product is obviously more expensive than ceramic, but I don't understand why
the *installation* price is so much greater for installing marble vs.
ceramic. How does the installation process differ?

"Brad" wrote in message
news:MPG.198f2e81bdba47a198b54d@news...
In article ,
said...

"Billy" wrote in message
...
I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store

said
they
would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft.

What
is
so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so

much
more
expensive?


cost of product


I think he was talking about only the installation cost.




Tim Davis July 29th 03 05:25 AM

Installation - Ceramaic Tile vs. Marble
 
These prices reflect the total cost for the job, material AND installation,
and are fairly standard. Both products are usually installed by competent
setters in a similar fashion, that is thinset mortar over a suitable
substrate. Ceramic tiles may however, and are commonly set using mastic
instead of mortar. The installation of marble is often easier for the
tilesetter, as the tiles are often a full 12" square, thus many fewer pieces
to work with, hence many fewer cuts.


"Billy" wrote in message
...
I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store said

they
would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft. What

is
so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so much

more
expensive?





Tim Davis July 29th 03 05:25 AM

Installation - Ceramaic Tile vs. Marble
 
These prices reflect the total cost for the job, material AND installation,
and are fairly standard. Both products are usually installed by competent
setters in a similar fashion, that is thinset mortar over a suitable
substrate. Ceramic tiles may however, and are commonly set using mastic
instead of mortar. The installation of marble is often easier for the
tilesetter, as the tiles are often a full 12" square, thus many fewer pieces
to work with, hence many fewer cuts.


"Billy" wrote in message
...
I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store said

they
would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft. What

is
so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so much

more
expensive?





Richard Kaiser July 29th 03 05:54 AM

Installation - Ceramaic Tile vs. Marble
 
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:31:31 -0700, Billy wrote:

That is correct, installation cost is what I don't understand. The
marble product is obviously more expensive than ceramic, but I don't
understand why the *installation* price is so much greater for
installing marble vs. ceramic. How does the installation process differ?

"Brad" wrote in message
news:MPG.198f2e81bdba47a198b54d@news...
In article ,
said...

"Billy" wrote in message
...
I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store

said
they
would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft.

What
is
so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so



The thinset for marble and granite is a special flexable mix that costs
four to five times as much. If this accounts for the full difference
I don't know. My granite is still waiting for me to get my kitchen
counters installed, counter are wating on the cabinets, cabinets
are waiting on the floor, floor is waiting on the wiring, wiring
is waiting on .... Yey, demolishion is almost done.

Richard "Don't know, not there yet" Kaiser

Richard Kaiser July 29th 03 05:54 AM

Installation - Ceramaic Tile vs. Marble
 
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:31:31 -0700, Billy wrote:

That is correct, installation cost is what I don't understand. The
marble product is obviously more expensive than ceramic, but I don't
understand why the *installation* price is so much greater for
installing marble vs. ceramic. How does the installation process differ?

"Brad" wrote in message
news:MPG.198f2e81bdba47a198b54d@news...
In article ,
said...

"Billy" wrote in message
...
I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store

said
they
would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft.

What
is
so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so



The thinset for marble and granite is a special flexable mix that costs
four to five times as much. If this accounts for the full difference
I don't know. My granite is still waiting for me to get my kitchen
counters installed, counter are wating on the cabinets, cabinets
are waiting on the floor, floor is waiting on the wiring, wiring
is waiting on .... Yey, demolishion is almost done.

Richard "Don't know, not there yet" Kaiser

Amos July 29th 03 03:29 PM

Installation - Ceramaic Tile vs. Marble
 
Tim Davis wrote:

These prices reflect the total cost for the job, material AND installation,
and are fairly standard. Both products are usually installed by competent
setters in a similar fashion, that is thinset mortar over a suitable
substrate. Ceramic tiles may however, and are commonly set using mastic
instead of mortar. The installation of marble is often easier for the
tilesetter, as the tiles are often a full 12" square, thus many fewer pieces
to work with, hence many fewer cuts.



Oh shut the **** up you top-posting imbecile. Pros do not, nor
recommend using tile mastic for floor tile installation and if marble is
set properly with a tight joint, over a 'fresh' mortar bed, using pure
cement and beat in it's far more work than slapping floor tile down over
a slab or backerboard using a standard 3/16" joint.

Your advice sucks.


Amos July 29th 03 03:29 PM

Installation - Ceramaic Tile vs. Marble
 
Tim Davis wrote:

These prices reflect the total cost for the job, material AND installation,
and are fairly standard. Both products are usually installed by competent
setters in a similar fashion, that is thinset mortar over a suitable
substrate. Ceramic tiles may however, and are commonly set using mastic
instead of mortar. The installation of marble is often easier for the
tilesetter, as the tiles are often a full 12" square, thus many fewer pieces
to work with, hence many fewer cuts.



Oh shut the **** up you top-posting imbecile. Pros do not, nor
recommend using tile mastic for floor tile installation and if marble is
set properly with a tight joint, over a 'fresh' mortar bed, using pure
cement and beat in it's far more work than slapping floor tile down over
a slab or backerboard using a standard 3/16" joint.

Your advice sucks.


Amos July 29th 03 03:33 PM

Installation - Ceramaic Tile vs. Marble
 
Billy wrote:

That is correct, installation cost is what I don't understand. The marble
product is obviously more expensive than ceramic, but I don't understand why
the *installation* price is so much greater for installing marble vs.
ceramic. How does the installation process differ?

"Brad" wrote in message
news:MPG.198f2e81bdba47a198b54d@news...

In article ,
said...

"Billy" wrote in message
...

I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store


said

they

would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft.


What

is

so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so


much

more

expensive?

cost of product


I think he was talking about only the installation cost.





Next time you post make yourself clear moron. And quit top posting.
Look at ****ing mess you've made. Meantime ask the g'damned installer
why it's so much higher. Or go back and read Fred Martin's posts.

It's obvious they're doing something with the substrate. Probably the
mortar like Fred already told you. Plus you give no specs as to room
shape, size or anything else.


Amos July 29th 03 03:33 PM

Installation - Ceramaic Tile vs. Marble
 
Billy wrote:

That is correct, installation cost is what I don't understand. The marble
product is obviously more expensive than ceramic, but I don't understand why
the *installation* price is so much greater for installing marble vs.
ceramic. How does the installation process differ?

"Brad" wrote in message
news:MPG.198f2e81bdba47a198b54d@news...

In article ,
said...

"Billy" wrote in message
...

I recently priced ceramic tile vs. marble installations. The store


said

they

would install ceramic/porcelain for $6 and marble to $15 per sq ft.


What

is

so involved or different in a marble installation that makes it so


much

more

expensive?

cost of product


I think he was talking about only the installation cost.





Next time you post make yourself clear moron. And quit top posting.
Look at ****ing mess you've made. Meantime ask the g'damned installer
why it's so much higher. Or go back and read Fred Martin's posts.

It's obvious they're doing something with the substrate. Probably the
mortar like Fred already told you. Plus you give no specs as to room
shape, size or anything else.


Tim Davis July 30th 03 06:08 AM

REPOST: Installation - Ceramaic Tile vs. Marble
 
I am so hurt, Ass-Mos, by your scathing criticism.


"Amos" wrote in message
...
Tim Davis wrote:

These prices reflect the total cost for the job, material AND

installation,
and are fairly standard. Both products are usually installed by

competent
setters in a similar fashion, that is thinset mortar over a suitable
substrate. Ceramic tiles may however, and are commonly set using mastic
instead of mortar. The installation of marble is often easier for the
tilesetter, as the tiles are often a full 12" square, thus many fewer

pieces
to work with, hence many fewer cuts.



Oh shut the **** up you top-posting imbecile. Pros do not, nor
recommend using tile mastic for floor tile installation and if marble is
set properly with a tight joint, over a 'fresh' mortar bed, using pure
cement and beat in it's far more work than slapping floor tile down over
a slab or backerboard using a standard 3/16" joint.

Your advice sucks.

========= WAS CANCELLED BY =======:
Path:

newsengine.sol.net!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.a
c.jp!news.cn99.com!not-for-mail
From: (Amos)
Newsgroups: alt.home.repair
Subject: cmsg cancel
Control: cancel
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:36:27 -0400
Organization: Bentium Ltd. (CN99)
Lines: 1
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: 61.159.235.36
X-Trace: mail.cn99.com 1059489338 2923 61.159.235.36 (29 Jul 2003 14:35:38

GMT)
X-Complaints-To:

NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:35:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243

cancel




Tim Davis July 30th 03 06:08 AM

REPOST: Installation - Ceramaic Tile vs. Marble
 
I am so hurt, Ass-Mos, by your scathing criticism.


"Amos" wrote in message
...
Tim Davis wrote:

These prices reflect the total cost for the job, material AND

installation,
and are fairly standard. Both products are usually installed by

competent
setters in a similar fashion, that is thinset mortar over a suitable
substrate. Ceramic tiles may however, and are commonly set using mastic
instead of mortar. The installation of marble is often easier for the
tilesetter, as the tiles are often a full 12" square, thus many fewer

pieces
to work with, hence many fewer cuts.



Oh shut the **** up you top-posting imbecile. Pros do not, nor
recommend using tile mastic for floor tile installation and if marble is
set properly with a tight joint, over a 'fresh' mortar bed, using pure
cement and beat in it's far more work than slapping floor tile down over
a slab or backerboard using a standard 3/16" joint.

Your advice sucks.

========= WAS CANCELLED BY =======:
Path:

newsengine.sol.net!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.a
c.jp!news.cn99.com!not-for-mail
From: (Amos)
Newsgroups: alt.home.repair
Subject: cmsg cancel
Control: cancel
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:36:27 -0400
Organization: Bentium Ltd. (CN99)
Lines: 1
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: 61.159.235.36
X-Trace: mail.cn99.com 1059489338 2923 61.159.235.36 (29 Jul 2003 14:35:38

GMT)
X-Complaints-To:

NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:35:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243

cancel




mark Ransly July 30th 03 03:33 PM

REPOST: Installation - Ceramaic Tile vs. Marble
 
Tim Davis wrote:

I am so hurt, Ass-Mos, by your scathing criticism.



And well you should be.. Take your sorry-assed 25 year off and on
(mostly off and probably ****ed up) tile exp. and hit the road. People
come here for correct advice. Not some Podunk AR bull**** that
wannabe's like you spew..


mark Ransly July 30th 03 03:33 PM

REPOST: Installation - Ceramaic Tile vs. Marble
 
Tim Davis wrote:

I am so hurt, Ass-Mos, by your scathing criticism.



And well you should be.. Take your sorry-assed 25 year off and on
(mostly off and probably ****ed up) tile exp. and hit the road. People
come here for correct advice. Not some Podunk AR bull**** that
wannabe's like you spew..



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter