Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow!
I just checked what it would cost to rebuild the battery pack on my Black & Decker rechargeable 12v drill. At http://www.primecell.com/pctools.htm For a 12.0 Volts rebuild: Replace NICD with high capacity upgrade: $ 33.00 plus $9 return shipping and I assume approximately $9 to ship the battery TO primecell.com. That a total of $51. The cost of a new 12v B&D rechargeable in Lowes is $39.97. http://www.lowes.com/pd_295344-79992-BD12PSK_0__?productId=1208731&Ntt=black+decker+12+ rechargeable&pl=1¤tURL=%2Fpl__0__s%3FNtt%3Db lack%2Bdecker%2B12%2Brechargeable&facetInfo= Would the rebuilt battery pack be better than that which comes with a new drill? Or should I just avoid rechargeables, as is my inclination. -- Work is the curse of the drinking class. |
#2
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Caesar Romano wrote:
Wow! I just checked what it would cost to rebuild the battery pack on my Black & Decker rechargeable 12v drill. At http://www.primecell.com/pctools.htm For a 12.0 Volts rebuild: Replace NICD with high capacity upgrade: $ 33.00 plus $9 return shipping and I assume approximately $9 to ship the battery TO primecell.com. That a total of $51. The cost of a new 12v B&D rechargeable in Lowes is $39.97. http://www.lowes.com/pd_295344-79992-BD12PSK_0__?productId=1208731&Ntt=black+decker+12+ rechargeable&pl=1¤tURL=%2Fpl__0__s%3FNtt%3Db lack%2Bdecker%2B12%2Brechargeable&facetInfo= Would the rebuilt battery pack be better than that which comes with a new drill? Or should I just avoid rechargeables, as is my inclination. A rebuild battery can be much better than the factory-supplied one. Or you can rebuild it yourself. In addition to the bulk batteries, you'll need to fashion a capacitive-discharge welder. Won't cost much: A big honkin' capacitor, a 12-volt DC supply (like a battery charger), a thyatron, and a switch. Google for "capacitve welder" and you'll find plans and supplies. |
#3
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 23, 5:58*pm, "HeyBub" wrote:
Caesar Romano wrote: Wow! I just checked what it would cost to rebuild the battery pack on my Black & Decker rechargeable 12v drill. At http://www.primecell.com/pctools.htm For a 12.0 Volts rebuild: Replace NICD with high capacity upgrade: *$ 33.00 plus $9 return shipping and I assume approximately $9 to ship the battery TO primecell.com. * That a total of $51. * The cost of a new 12v B&D rechargeable in Lowes is $39.97. http://www.lowes.com/pd_295344-79992-BD12PSK_0__?productId=1208731&Nt... Would the rebuilt battery pack be better than that which comes with a new drill? Or should I just avoid rechargeables, as is my inclination. A rebuild battery can be much better than the factory-supplied one. Or you can rebuild it yourself. In addition to the bulk batteries, you'll need to fashion a capacitive-discharge welder. Won't cost much: A big honkin' capacitor, a 12-volt DC supply (like a battery charger), a thyatron, and a switch. Google for "capacitve welder" and you'll find plans and supplies.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You don't need a spot welder if you buy batteries that have tabs already on them. I recently rebuilt an old Milwaukee one with batteries I bought on Ebay. Cost about $20, including shipping. It was a bit tricky though. Biggest potential problem that I narrowly avoided is that there isn't any extra space and while the replacement batteries are the same size, it's still a tight fit to get it all back together again. Also, my batteries arrived at least partially charged, so you have to be careful while soldering/assembling. If you have decent soldering skills you can do it. |
#4
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 23, 4:38*pm, Caesar Romano wrote:
Wow! I just checked what it would cost to rebuild the battery pack on my Black & Decker rechargeable 12v drill. At http://www.primecell.com/pctools.htm For a 12.0 Volts rebuild: Replace NICD with high capacity upgrade: *$ 33.00 plus $9 return shipping and I assume approximately $9 to ship the battery TO primecell.com. * That a total of $51. * The cost of a new 12v B&D rechargeable in Lowes is $39.97. http://www.lowes.com/pd_295344-79992-BD12PSK_0__?productId=1208731&Nt.... Would the rebuilt battery pack be better than that which comes with a new drill? Or should I just avoid rechargeables, as is my inclination. -- Work is the curse of the drinking class. B & D is the bargain line of the company, IMO replacement is a dubious choice. The world has mostly adopted Li ion. so look for a new drill powered that way. Makita is a favorite of tradesmen, Milwaukee, too. I upgraded my Milwaukee 18V NiCd to Li ion batteries with new charger when they became available and haven't looked back. Read the reviews at Amazon and pick what you like best. The serious DIYer will have corded and cordless in his kit, taking advantage of the unique characteristics of each. Better tools = better results. Joe |
#5
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Caesar Romano" wrote in message ... Wow! I just checked what it would cost to rebuild the battery pack on my Black & Decker rechargeable 12v drill. At http://www.primecell.com/pctools.htm For a 12.0 Volts rebuild: Replace NICD with high capacity upgrade: $ 33.00 plus $9 return shipping and I assume approximately $9 to ship the battery TO primecell.com. That a total of $51. The cost of a new 12v B&D rechargeable in Lowes is $39.97. http://www.lowes.com/pd_295344-79992-BD12PSK_0__?productId=1208731&Ntt=black+decker+12+ rechargeable&pl=1¤tURL=%2Fpl__0__s%3FNtt%3Db lack%2Bdecker%2B12%2Brechargeable&facetInfo= Would the rebuilt battery pack be better than that which comes with a new drill? Or should I just avoid rechargeables, as is my inclination. -- Work is the curse of the drinking class. Yes, no, maybe, positively, and I don't know. New batteries are coming with lithium batteries and metal hydrides that are far better than the nickel cadmium of old. They do not have to be discharged fully, and then be recharged like nicads. The old nicads developed a "memory" if partially discharged then charged, and you could only get them to charge up say 70%. With the new ones, even if you just use the battery some, put it in the charger and it's good to go for tomorrow, no issues of letting the thing run down, and it always runs down at the worst time. With the new ones, you can always "top off" the battery with no memory issue. I'd chuck the B&D and get a REAL drill. Whatever money you spend now may be tossed down the drain if you have another issue with the drill, and that money "could" have been spent towards a better drill. Pawn shops, yard sales, and other places have good used drills if you don't want to spring for a new one dollar wise. I got a DeWalt 18v. on sale, and I wish I had done it sooner. From what I understand, Ryobi makes a decent drill for the price, and that isn't a lot more than what you're talking about for a battery. YMMV, of course. Steve -- Heart surgery pending? www.heartsurgerysurvivalguide.com Heart Surgery Survival Guide Now on facebook, too. |
#6
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/23/2011 3:30 PM, Steve B wrote:
"Caesar wrote in message ... Wow! I just checked what it would cost to rebuild the battery pack on my Black& Decker rechargeable 12v drill. At http://www.primecell.com/pctools.htm For a 12.0 Volts rebuild: Replace NICD with high capacity upgrade: $ 33.00 plus $9 return shipping and I assume approximately $9 to ship the battery TO primecell.com. That a total of $51. The cost of a new 12v B&D rechargeable in Lowes is $39.97. http://www.lowes.com/pd_295344-79992-BD12PSK_0__?productId=1208731&Ntt=black+decker+12+ rechargeable&pl=1¤tURL=%2Fpl__0__s%3FNtt%3Db lack%2Bdecker%2B12%2Brechargeable&facetInfo= Would the rebuilt battery pack be better than that which comes with a new drill? Or should I just avoid rechargeables, as is my inclination. -- Work is the curse of the drinking class. Yes, no, maybe, positively, and I don't know. New batteries are coming with lithium batteries and metal hydrides that are far better than the nickel cadmium of old. They do not have to be discharged fully, and then be recharged like nicads. The old nicads developed a "memory" if partially discharged then charged, and you could only get them to charge up say 70%. With the new ones, even if you just use the battery some, put it in the charger and it's good to go for tomorrow, no issues of letting the thing run down, and it always runs down at the worst time. With the new ones, you can always "top off" the battery with no memory issue. Lithium ion batteries have a lifetime # of recharges. a partial recharge counts against this limit. I'd chuck the B&D and get a REAL drill. Whatever money you spend now may be tossed down the drain if you have another issue with the drill, and that money "could" have been spent towards a better drill. Pawn shops, yard sales, and other places have good used drills if you don't want to spring for a new one dollar wise. I got a DeWalt 18v. on sale, and I wish I had done it sooner. From what I understand, Ryobi makes a decent drill for the price, and that isn't a lot more than what you're talking about for a battery. YMMV, of course. Steve |
#7
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Steve B" wrote: The old nicads developed a "memory" if partially discharged then charged, and you could only get them to charge up say 70%. Complete nonsense, and one of the internet's most persistent fallacious rumors. |
#8
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/26/2011 10:41 AM, Smitty Two wrote:
In m, "Steve wrote: The old nicads developed a "memory" if partially discharged then charged, and you could only get them to charge up say 70%. Complete nonsense, and one of the internet's most persistent fallacious rumors. It's true, and the so called rumor was out before the internet was around. Newer Ni-Cads, yes they found a cure for it. Also true that they could often be brought back to life after a few charge discharge cycles. I have first hand experience with 500 to 1000 of them, I _know_ it was true. And the 70% is putting it mildly, I dealt with ones that were down to about 10% capacity until being discharged and recharged which brought them back to about 90% capacity. I did however always hate the term "memory" to describe the problem. |
#9
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Tony Miklos wrote: On 8/26/2011 10:41 AM, Smitty Two wrote: In m, "Steve wrote: The old nicads developed a "memory" if partially discharged then charged, and you could only get them to charge up say 70%. Complete nonsense, and one of the internet's most persistent fallacious rumors. It's true, and the so called rumor was out before the internet was around. Newer Ni-Cads, yes they found a cure for it. Also true that they could often be brought back to life after a few charge discharge cycles. I have first hand experience with 500 to 1000 of them, I _know_ it was true. And the 70% is putting it mildly, I dealt with ones that were down to about 10% capacity until being discharged and recharged which brought them back to about 90% capacity. I did however always hate the term "memory" to describe the problem. I've rehashed this so many times I hate to do it again, but here goes: 1. Non-rechargeable cells were (are) nominally 1.5 volts. A standard gadget often used 2 such cells, providing 3 volts. 2. Rechargeable (nicads) were (are) 1.2 volts. A two-cell gadget was thus supplied with 2.4 volts. 3. The gadgets were NOT re-engineered for the lower voltage. 4. The "memory" effect lowered the voltage by about 5%, period. 5. Do the math: 0.95 x 2.4 = 2.28 volts. 6. Most 3 volt gadgets were more or less designed to stop working somewhere in the 2.3-2.5 volt range, so a battery with less voltage remaining was essentially "dead." 7. The nicads therefore had virtually zero headroom, and a tiny drop in capacity due to anything less than absolute perfect charge/discharge curves put them under the bottom edge of performance minimums for many gadgets. 8. Therefore, this was NEVER a "memory effect" problem, it was ALWAYS a lack of proper engineering changes to account for the lower nominal voltage of rechargeables. 9. The fake "memory effect" went away when the engineers woke up and redesigned stuff to run well on 2.4 volts, and down to a reasonable discharge level of 2 or less. |
#10
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/26/2011 7:47 PM, Smitty Two wrote:
In , Tony wrote: On 8/26/2011 10:41 AM, Smitty Two wrote: In m, "Steve wrote: The old nicads developed a "memory" if partially discharged then charged, and you could only get them to charge up say 70%. Complete nonsense, and one of the internet's most persistent fallacious rumors. It's true, and the so called rumor was out before the internet was around. Newer Ni-Cads, yes they found a cure for it. Also true that they could often be brought back to life after a few charge discharge cycles. I have first hand experience with 500 to 1000 of them, I _know_ it was true. And the 70% is putting it mildly, I dealt with ones that were down to about 10% capacity until being discharged and recharged which brought them back to about 90% capacity. I did however always hate the term "memory" to describe the problem. I've rehashed this so many times I hate to do it again, but here goes: 1. Non-rechargeable cells were (are) nominally 1.5 volts. A standard gadget often used 2 such cells, providing 3 volts. 2. Rechargeable (nicads) were (are) 1.2 volts. A two-cell gadget was thus supplied with 2.4 volts. 3. The gadgets were NOT re-engineered for the lower voltage. 4. The "memory" effect lowered the voltage by about 5%, period. 5. Do the math: 0.95 x 2.4 = 2.28 volts. 6. Most 3 volt gadgets were more or less designed to stop working somewhere in the 2.3-2.5 volt range, so a battery with less voltage remaining was essentially "dead." 7. The nicads therefore had virtually zero headroom, and a tiny drop in capacity due to anything less than absolute perfect charge/discharge curves put them under the bottom edge of performance minimums for many gadgets. 8. Therefore, this was NEVER a "memory effect" problem, it was ALWAYS a lack of proper engineering changes to account for the lower nominal voltage of rechargeables. 9. The fake "memory effect" went away when the engineers woke up and redesigned stuff to run well on 2.4 volts, and down to a reasonable discharge level of 2 or less. LOL! So why did the batteries hold a charge better when charged as recommended? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Battery drill external battery pack | Metalworking | |||
battery pack remanufacturing | Electronics Repair | |||
Rechargeable Battery Rebuild Questions | Woodworking | |||
rechargeable battery rebuild | Metalworking | |||
Ryobi 18 Battery rebuild? | Home Repair |