Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Kitchen sockets: stylish new design
I'd be interested to know if anyone has used these rather stylish electrical
sockets: http://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Main_Ind...ets/index.html - these are from TLC but Screwfix now carry a similar range. It's not at all clear from the illustrations just how they are mounted; presumably the fixings are concealed inside the boxes, but how are they accessed? Many thanks. Bert http://www.bertcoules.co.uk |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Bert Coules wrote:
It's not at all clear from the illustrations just how they are mounted; presumably the fixings are concealed inside the boxes, but how are they accessed? Looks to me that the outer rim would "pop" off, leaving the circular part raised, and the screws to the sides of that? Brushed chrome finish it says? Crushed coal more like! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Andy,
Thanks for the reply. Looks to me that the outer rim would "pop" off, leaving the circular part raised, and the screws to the sides of that? Yes, I wondered about that. It does seem the likeliest solution. Brushed chrome finish it says? Crushed coal more like! For the actual socket bit, you mean? I rather like that - a pleasant change from the usual white. It's hard to judge the outer housing (which presumably is the brushed chrome bit - I wonder what they brush it with?) from the pictures. I think I'm going to give these a try in my new kitchen. I hate chasing out for sunken wall-boxes, and especially trying to get two or three to line up neatly next to each other. Bert http://www.bertcoules.co.uk |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Bert Coules wrote:
For the actual socket bit, you mean? I rather like that - a pleasant change from the usual white. I didn't say they were bad. I think I'm going to give these a try in my new kitchen. I hate chasing out for sunken wall-boxes, and especially trying to get two or three to line up neatly next to each other. FX: penny dropping Ahh, just had another look, I think I see now! The 30° angled section is _part_of_ the socket, I was thinking they were just mounted on that for display, and you'd have to fit something similar yourself ... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Andy,
Ahh, just had another look, I think I see now! The 30° angled section is _part_of_ the socket, I was thinking they were just mounted on that for display, and you'd have to fit something similar yourself ... I understand your confusion. No, the brushed chrome wedge-shaped mount is part and parcel of the whole thing. If you choose the worktop/wall angle as the place to put them (as opposed to the underside-of-the-wall-unit/wall angle) then clearly they'll take up some of the worktop space, but I'm inclined to think that's a small price to pay for neatness and convenience. Bert http://www.bertcoules.co.uk |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I would be very wary of these sockets. The doubles are un-switched plus the
single switched are in my opinion expensive. I tried one of these in a customers kitchen who wanted a lot of sockets and not see them, well they are not all that well hidden plus you have a flex going ALL the way UP to under the cupboard. You are much better off mounting a socket at the height prescribed in the current IEE regulations and I am not too sure if these are to British Standards either. Beware of doing DIY from 1st Jan Nest year unless you consult building control and have it tested you will be breaking the law and could be fined a hefty sum check out www.a2znorthants.co.uk and click on part P Regards John Stanton "Bert Coules" wrote in message ... I'd be interested to know if anyone has used these rather stylish electrical sockets: http://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Main_Ind...ets/index.html - these are from TLC but Screwfix now carry a similar range. It's not at all clear from the illustrations just how they are mounted; presumably the fixings are concealed inside the boxes, but how are they accessed? Many thanks. Bert http://www.bertcoules.co.uk |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
John,
Thanks for the reply. I would be very wary of these sockets. The doubles are un-switched plus the single switched are in my opinion expensive. I don't see the lack of switches as any sort of drawback. And the range doesn't include any single switched sockets: what looks like one is, in fact, a single unswitched socket and a quite separate switch in the same housing. An unusual arrangement, I agree. As to expense, well, something is worth what someone is willing to pay for it. I tried one of these in a customer's kitchen who wanted a lot of sockets and not see them, well they are not all that well hidden plus you have a flex going ALL the way UP to under the cupboard. I was thinking of mounting them in the alternative position, on the worktop. You are much better off mounting a socket at the height prescribed in the current IEE regulations... I really don't see why. ...and I am not too sure if these are to British Standards either. Wouldn't that mean they were being sold illegally? From a supplier with the reputation on TLC, isn't that a little surprising? Beware of doing DIY from 1st Jan next year unless you consult building control and have it tested you will be breaking the law... I'm aware of this impending legislation, consider it ridiculous and intrusive, and have no intention of allowing it to stop me doing my own wiring in my own home. Bert http://www.bertcoules.co.uk |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"dms1.go-plus.net" wrote in message ... I would be very wary of these sockets. The doubles are un-switched plus the single switched are in my opinion expensive. I tried one of these in a customers kitchen who wanted a lot of sockets and not see them, well they are not all that well hidden plus you have a flex going ALL the way UP to under the cupboard. You are much better off mounting a socket at the height prescribed in the current IEE regulations and I am not too sure if these are to British Standards either. What height is that? Beware of doing DIY from 1st Jan Nest year unless you consult building control and have it tested you will be breaking the law and could be fined a hefty sum check out www.a2znorthants.co.uk and click on part P |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Bert Coules" wrote in message ... I'd be interested to know if anyone has used these rather stylish electrical sockets: http://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Main_Ind...ets/index.html - these are from TLC but Screwfix now carry a similar range. It's not at all clear from the illustrations just how they are mounted; presumably the fixings are concealed inside the boxes, but how are they accessed? Many thanks. Bert http://www.bertcoules.co.uk I have fitted these and they are incredibly badly designed. There are no useful instructions in the packaging. The sockets are screwed to the metal wedge; the fixings are tabs on the inside of the wedge. Each socket is individually wired. Thus, to fit a double socket in a ring final circuit, you need to remove the socket inserts, mount the "wedge" (it wobbles!), pull the ring circuit feeds through the holes where the sockets fit, wire each socket insert and then another cable to wire between the two sockets. Clearly the metal wedge should also be earthed and I cannot remember if a flylead was included or if I just crimped a ring to go under a fixing screw. Once all the wires are in place, the whole lot has to be crammed untidily into the case so that the sockets can be screwed in place. It is well worth using a proper cable stripper as any nipped cores are likely to get fractured. Having spent ages fitting the buggers, the client decided to replace them as they were "too flimsily mounted" I would never advise using these fittings They did look very pretty though! HTH Adrian |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 20:32:20 -0000, "IMM" strung
together this: What height is that? Well **** me, that's exactly the question I was about to ask. -- SJW A.C.S. Ltd Please reply to group or use 'usenet' in email subject |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Adrian,
Thanks for the detailed reply. I have fitted these and they are incredibly badly designed. They sound it. I'm grateful for advice based on your actually having worked with them. Did you use the ones from TLC, or a similar product from another source? I know I've seen a very slightly different design somewhere - I thought it was from Screwfix but I can't find them on their website, so I suppose it must have been another supplier. I've ordered a sample double socket from TLC to have a look at. If they're as dodgy as you say I'll probably give the whole idea a miss. A pity though - they really do seem like the most stylish alternative to sinking those damned galvanised boxes into the wall. The only other non-sinking method I can think of is to use surface-mounted pattress boxes: terribly ugly and intrusive. Thanks again. Bert http://www.bertcoules.co.uk |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Adrian Berry" wrote in message ... "Bert Coules" wrote in message ... I'd be interested to know if anyone has used these rather stylish electrical sockets: http://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Main_Ind..._Index/Under_W orktop_Sockets/index.html - these are from TLC but Screwfix now carry a similar range. It's not at all clear from the illustrations just how they are mounted; presumably the fixings are concealed inside the boxes, but how are they accessed? Many thanks. Bert http://www.bertcoules.co.uk I have fitted these and they are incredibly badly designed. The Screwfix or TLC versions? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Adrian Berry" wrote in message ... They did look very pretty though! They do look good from the picture. I think it is worth the fiddling to prevent the wall being butchered out. The cable can go in the cable void behind the cupboard. Surely they can be secured well, even if it means drilling a few holes behind the units here and there. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Adrian Berry" wrote in message ... "Bert Coules" wrote in message ... I'd be interested to know if anyone has used these rather stylish electrical sockets: http://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Main_Ind..._Index/Under_W orktop_Sockets/index.html - these are from TLC but Screwfix now carry a similar range. It's not at all clear from the illustrations just how they are mounted; presumably the fixings are concealed inside the boxes, but how are they accessed? Many thanks. Bert http://www.bertcoules.co.uk I have fitted these and they are incredibly badly designed. There are no useful instructions in the packaging. The sockets are screwed to the metal wedge; the fixings are tabs on the inside of the wedge. Each socket is individually wired. Thus, to fit a double socket in a ring final circuit, you need to remove the socket inserts, mount the "wedge" (it wobbles!), pull the ring circuit feeds through the holes where the sockets fit, wire each socket insert and then another cable to wire between the two sockets. Clearly the metal wedge should also be earthed and I cannot remember if a flylead was included or if I just crimped a ring to go under a fixing screw. Once all the wires are in place, the whole lot has to be crammed untidily into the case so that the sockets can be screwed in place. It is well worth using a proper cable stripper as any nipped cores are likely to get fractured. That sounds like wiring any socket. Having spent ages fitting the buggers, the client decided to replace them as they were "too flimsily mounted" I would never advise using these fittings They did look very pretty though! HTH Adrian |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Bert Coules wrote: A pity though - they really do seem like the most stylish alternative to sinking those damned galvanised boxes into the wall. The only other non-sinking method I can think of is to use surface-mounted pattress boxes: terribly ugly and intrusive. Get an rotary hammer (SDS with rotation stop) and chasing out boxes becomes pretty easy. Think they start at about 30 quid these days. FWIW, I think those angled sockets look awful. Decent SS types set squarely and evenly in tiles look the bizz. -- *Consciousness: That annoying time between naps. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
IMM wrote: They do look good from the picture. I think it is worth the fiddling to prevent the wall being butchered out. The cable can go in the cable void behind the cupboard. Surely they can be secured well, even if it means drilling a few holes behind the units here and there. Be easier - and neater - to make a fillet piece out of whatever the units are and run it the length of the cupboards. Then simply cut in normal boxes for normal sockets. If you really can only butcher a wall when fitting boxes. Perhaps you need a decent SDS rotary stop drill rather than the rubbish you keep recommending here? -- *For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"IMM" writes: "dms1.go-plus.net" wrote in message ... I would be very wary of these sockets. The doubles are un-switched plus the single switched are in my opinion expensive. I've saw them on the continent some time before I saw them over here. They were originally designed for Shuko and the French/Belgium sockets, hence the 13A socket in a round cutout. I would want to try one out for quality before buying a kitchen full of them. There are lights in the same design, and they are a really bad idea. The light reflects off everything on the worktop straight into your eyes. I tried one of these in a customers kitchen who wanted a lot of sockets and not see them, well they are not all that well hidden plus you have a flex going ALL the way UP to under the cupboard. You are much better off mounting a socket at the height prescribed in the current IEE regulations and I am not too sure if these are to British Standards either. What height is that? IEE regs doesn't have any height prescribed, but 110cm from floor to bottom of socket is common and works with typical kitchen units. Remember to allow for floor thickness if flooring isn't yet fitted. -- Andrew Gabriel |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Bert Coules" wrote in message ... Adrian, Thanks for the detailed reply. I have fitted these and they are incredibly badly designed. They sound it. I'm grateful for advice based on your actually having worked with them. Did you use the ones from TLC, or a similar product from another source? I know I've seen a very slightly different design somewhere - I thought it was from Screwfix but I can't find them on their website, so I suppose it must have been another supplier. They were from TLC (Merton) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Dave,
Thanks for the reply. Get a rotary hammer (SDS with rotation stop) and chasing out boxes becomes pretty easy. I have one, and have also experimented with those square-chisel box-cutters. Depending on the state of the walls (extremely variable in my place) I can usually make the edges of the cut-out quite neat; but to create a flat, even back to the hole, at the correct depth, almost invariably escapes me. Plus, I hate the mess. Bert http://www.bertcoules.co.uk |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Andrew,
Thanks for the reply. I would want to try one out for quality before buying a kitchen full of them. I've now ordered one from TLC to have a look at. I wish I could remember where else I've seen them; I was sure it was Screwfix but I can't find them on their website. If anyone has any ideas, I'd be grateful for them. Bert http://www.bertcoules.co.uk |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Bert Coules wrote: but to create a flat, even back to the hole, at the correct depth, almost invariably escapes me. You don't need to. Simply make it large enough and slop in a dollop of quickset mortar. Wedge the box in place until it dries. -- *Real women don't have hot flashes, they have power surges. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Dave,
You don't need to. Simply make it large enough and slop in a dollop of quickset mortar. Wedge the box in place until it dries. And then mark for the securing screw, remove the box and drill and plug the hole, you mean? I have tried that in the past with reasonable results; perhaps I'll give it another go. Thanks. Bert http://www.bertcoules.co.uk |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , IMM wrote: They do look good from the picture. I think it is worth the fiddling to prevent the wall being butchered out. The cable can go in the cable void behind the cupboard. Surely they can be secured well, even if it means drilling a few holes behind the units here and there. Be easier - and neater - to make a It woudn't. snip the rest of the babble |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
"Bert Coules" wrote in message
... Dave, You don't need to. Simply make it large enough and slop in a dollop of quickset mortar. Wedge the box in place until it dries. And then mark for the securing screw, remove the box and drill and plug the hole, you mean? I have tried that in the past with reasonable results; perhaps I'll give it another go. Thanks. I tend to drill the securing holes & plug before the dollop of plaster - as you tighten the screws pullng the box home it squeezes the plaster out & it can be scraped off flush. All rock solid & secure once it's set. -- Richard Sampson mail me at richard at olifant d-ot co do-t uk |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Richard,
I tend to drill the securing holes & plug before the dollop of plaster - as you tighten the screws pulling the box home it squeezes the plaster out & it can be scraped off flush. All rock solid & secure once it's set. That makes sense, thanks; though I do recall on some past attempts that the brickwork had crumbled so much that drilling a hole before putting in the mortar was simply impossible. Probably I've just been unlucky with my walls. I take the point that it can be damaging to try to remove the box once the plaster's in and set, though. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
IEE regs doesn't have any height prescribed, but 110cm from floor
to bottom of socket is common and works with typical kitchen units. Remember to allow for floor thickness if flooring isn't yet fitted. Yes, I've used 20cm from worksurface to bottom of socket for mine (which is the same thing given 90cm standard worksurface height). It seems to be a reasonable compromise between having excessively trailing leads and not having the sockets blocked by the worksurface contents. Christian. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ...
snip Get an rotary hammer (SDS with rotation stop) and chasing out boxes becomes pretty easy. Think they start at about 30 quid these days. How do these work? Do they literally just smash into the wall creating a socket sized rectangular hole? Is it a one step process or do you need to pre-drill or do any extra chiselling out at the end? cheers -- Steve F |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Steve,
How do these work? Do they literally just smash into the wall creating a socket sized rectangular hole? Is it a one step process or do you need to pre-drill or do any extra chiselling out at the end? It's a three (and possible a four) stage process: Having marked out the position of the box, you drill a central hole which will eventually take a wallplug for the securing screw. You then use a two-inch circular face cutter (supplied in the full kit) to cut a round hole to the depth needed by the box. The cutter has a central guiding rod which fits into the pre-drilled hole. With the SDS drill set to hammer only, you use the box cutter (which also has a central guide rod) to cut the edges of the square (or rectangular) hole to the correct depth. If you're lucky, the masonry between the edges and the round hole will just break away. If you're unlucky you move on to stage four, and... Chisel away the excess brick. I found that the system works well. It does, though, produce a fair old bit of noise, vibration and dust. Bert http://www.bertcoules.co.uk |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
"Bert Coules" wrote
| That makes sense, thanks; though I do recall on some past attempts | that the brickwork had crumbled so much that drilling a hole before | putting in the mortar was simply impossible. Probably I've just | been unlucky with my walls. I take the point that it can be | damaging to try to remove the box once the plaster's in and set, | though. If you have a bank of sockets etc to mount, join the back boxes together rigidly with conduit couplers and bushes etc into a single rigid assembly. (Check distance between boxes to allow room for faceplate overlap). Work against a raised lip on a workbench and you will have the top of the boxes in a straight line as well as the backs on a plane surface. Then cement the whole lot into the all in one go. If you mount your sockets a multiple-of-tile-size apart and know where your tile joints will be on the finished wall you can get a nice regular tiling pattern with no socket edge sitting close-but-not-quite on a grout line. Owain |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Andrew Gabriel
wrote: In article , "IMM" writes: "dms1.go-plus.net" wrote in message ... [Snip] You are much better off mounting a socket at the height prescribed in the current IEE regulations and I am not too sure if these are to British Standards either. What height is that? IEE regs doesn't have any height prescribed, but 110cm from floor to bottom of socket is common and works with typical kitchen units. Remember to allow for floor thickness if flooring isn't yet fitted. According to the OSG (Appendix 8): "The Building Regulations require switches and socket-outlets in dwellings to be installed so that all persons including those whose reach is limited can easily use them" It quotes a height between 450 and 1200 mm from the ground. Looks like a piece of bureaucracy which makes little allowance for the actual use to which the relevant device is to be put. It does go on to say that this does not apply to kitchens and garages but to rooms that visitors would normally use, but I can think of several sockets and switches in our living room and bedrooms that visitors would have no need to touch. -- Mike Clarke |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
"Andrew Gabriel" wrote
| What height is that? | IEE regs doesn't have any height prescribed, but 110cm from floor | to bottom of socket is common and works with typical kitchen units. | Remember to allow for floor thickness if flooring isn't yet fitted. From a typical 3' worktop height that's only about 8". I would prefer and have 14"[1] as it means the socket clears the top of the m/wave and other appliances etc that accumulate. Owain [1] Stop s******ing at the back. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Owain,
If you have a bank of sockets etc to mount, join the back boxes together rigidly with conduit couplers and bushes etc into a single rigid assembly. (Check distance between boxes to allow room for faceplate overlap). Work against a raised lip on a workbench and you will have the top of the boxes in a straight line as well as the backs on a plane surface. Then cement the whole lot into the all in one go. That is an excellent suggestion. Thank you. Bert http://www.bertcoules.co.uk |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Mike Clarke writes: In article , Andrew Gabriel wrote: IEE regs doesn't have any height prescribed, but 110cm from floor to bottom of socket is common and works with typical kitchen units. Remember to allow for floor thickness if flooring isn't yet fitted. According to the OSG (Appendix 8): "The Building Regulations require switches and socket-outlets in dwellings to be installed so that all persons including those whose reach is limited can easily use them" It quotes a height between 450 and 1200 mm from the ground. Looks like a piece of bureaucracy which makes little allowance for the actual use to which the relevant device is to be put. It does go on to say that this does not apply to kitchens and garages but to rooms that visitors would normally use, but I can think of several sockets and switches in our living room and bedrooms that visitors would have no need to touch. This is a reference to Part M of the building regs. It only applies to new builds, not to modifications and extensions, although you are of course free to apply it if you want to. The heights quoted are examples and not strict rules, and might not be appropriate in all cases. In partcular, beware the 450mm min height could be quite a trip hazard for a socket outlet, and think carefully about any additional consequences of tripping at that location, such as falling through a window or down steps. -- Andrew Gabriel |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
"Owain" wrote in message ... "Andrew Gabriel" wrote | What height is that? | IEE regs doesn't have any height prescribed, but 110cm from floor | to bottom of socket is common and works with typical kitchen units. | Remember to allow for floor thickness if flooring isn't yet fitted. From a typical 3' worktop height that's only about 8". I would prefer and have 14"[1] as it means the socket clears the top of the m/wave and other appliances etc that accumulate. Same here. These angled sockets under teh cupboards are ideal. Most sockets over worktops are behind toasters and coffee jars. A silly place to have them. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:29:58 -0000, "Owain"
strung together this: If you have a bank of sockets etc to mount, join the back boxes together rigidly with conduit couplers and bushes etc into a single rigid assembly. Nice idea, which I have done before but only on council jobs, more particularly in schools, rather than anywhere else. It's not quite as rigid a structure as you imagine, although it's still fairly rigid, it does need levelling up before fixing. Distances between shouldn't be a problem as couplers are 35mm long, way more than a couple of overlaps. -- SJW A.C.S. Ltd Please reply to group or use 'usenet' in email subject |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:17:11 -0000, "Bert Coules"
strung together this: And then mark for the securing screw, remove the box and drill and plug the hole, you mean? No, that's the daft persons way! Leave the cement to set then drill, plug and screw through the box. -- SJW A.C.S. Ltd Please reply to group or use 'usenet' in email subject |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:31:50 -0000, "IMM" strung
together this: That sounds like wiring any socket. Only if you have never seen a socket before. Stick to ****ing up plumbing threads, you're even worse at electrics. -- SJW A.C.S. Ltd Please reply to group or use 'usenet' in email subject |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
"Lurch" wrote in message ... On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:31:50 -0000, "IMM" strung together this: That sounds like wiring any socket. Only if you have never seen a socket before. Stick to ****ing up plumbing threads, you're even worse at electrics. I am brilliant at anything electrical and also at life in general. You have been at the Guinness haven't you? |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Lurch,
No, that's the daft persons way! Leave the cement to set then drill, plug and screw through the box. And how exactly do I plug the wall with the box in situ? Bert http://www.bertcoules.co.uk |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Lurch,
If you have a bank of sockets etc to mount, join the back boxes together rigidly with conduit couplers and bushes etc into a single rigid assembly. It's not quite as rigid a structure as you imagine... How about mounting a row of sockets on a timber board or batten and burying that in the wall? Bert http://www.bertcoules.co.uk |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Celebrity Kitchen Design? | Woodworking | |||
WTB 20/20 Software version 5.1 - 5.2 | Woodworking | |||
Kitchen Fitter Standards | UK diy |