Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
Southern California Edison has finally announced the San Onofre
nuclear plant will be permanently shut down. The arrogance of SCE was typical of the "We know best" attitude of the utility industry found in some parts of the country. The San Onofre nuclear plant was an inferior design according to industry watchdogs that SCE tried to get recertified when it leaked without submitting to the certifying process. They were finally brought into submission. To put things in perspective, there are over 8 million people living with in 50 miles of San Onofre. Now for the plant's demolition, but leaving accumulated nuclear waste within 100 yards of the Pacific Ocean is not an option. There is still a lot of work ahead to properly dispose of all the waste material accumulated over the years and not allow San Onofre to become an ocean side nuclear dump after the plant's demolition. SCE will try to cut corners, that is their track record. Vigilance to keep them under control will be vital. Off the stump. Lew |
#2
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On 6/8/2013 1:03 AM, Lew Hodgett wrote:
Southern California Edison has finally announced the San Onofre nuclear plant will be permanently shut down. The arrogance of SCE was typical of the "We know best" attitude of the utility industry found in some parts of the country. The San Onofre nuclear plant was an inferior design according to industry watchdogs that SCE tried to get recertified when it leaked without submitting to the certifying process. They were finally brought into submission. To put things in perspective, there are over 8 million people living with in 50 miles of San Onofre. Now for the plant's demolition, but leaving accumulated nuclear waste within 100 yards of the Pacific Ocean is not an option. There is still a lot of work ahead to properly dispose of all the waste material accumulated over the years and not allow San Onofre to become an ocean side nuclear dump after the plant's demolition. SCE will try to cut corners, that is their track record. Vigilance to keep them under control will be vital. Off the stump. Lew Thank GOD, we have people in the Carolinas that are not afraid of Nuclear Energy and have trained knowledgeable people to run them in a safe manner. We have several plants that are online producing clean, environmental-friendly energy. They are not killing birds, creating noise in all frequencies. They are not taking up acres and acres of sunbaked land with no trees. We recently had a power plant problem. They found a small crack in a pipe going to the reactor. They shut the plant down, fixed it and restarted it. Several years ago we lived within 10 miles of one. Never did it affect our lives in a negative way. The large lake created for the cooling system was leased to the city and was a beautiful park with waking trails, picnic areas, etc. The lake itself was one of the best fishing lakes in the area. It is nice to know we have a reliable source of energy to run our air conditioners this summer, that will run day and night. That is not dependent on the wind which may be blowing over 100 mph during a hurricane one day, and the next be so weak that they will not move my small sailboat. |
#3
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
"Lew Hodgett" wrote:
Southern California Edison has finally announced the San Onofre nuclear plant will be permanently shut down. The arrogance of SCE was typical of the "We know best" attitude of the utility industry found in some parts of the country. The San Onofre nuclear plant was an inferior design according to industry watchdogs that SCE tried to get recertified when it leaked without submitting to the certifying process. They were finally brought into submission. To put things in perspective, there are over 8 million people living with in 50 miles of San Onofre. Now for the plant's demolition, but leaving accumulated nuclear waste within 100 yards of the Pacific Ocean is not an option. There is still a lot of work ahead to properly dispose of all the waste material accumulated over the years and not allow San Onofre to become an ocean side nuclear dump after the plant's demolition. SCE will try to cut corners, that is their track record. Vigilance to keep them under control will be vital. Off the stump. Lew I wonder if California's over the top restrictions and regulations are the source of the problems. I mean really, my new yard sprinkler which is also sold in California has to have cancer warning labels because something in it may or may not cause cancer in "1 in 1,000,000,000,000" test critters. The regulations seem to be so far fetched and absurd that a "legitimate" producer simply can not operate and make a profit. So what you end up with is a business environment that is too hostile for production. As a result it appears that the ones that do operate under the "California restrictions" and are producers of "whatever" probably hide the fact, or not, that they have to cut corners at every possible step. And because of the over bearing restrictions the businesses that could possibly do a better job and make a sustainable profit simply feel that life is too short to do business in California. This leaves you with the type of businesses you rant about, those that don't care about their image, those that will lie and hide what is really going on, those that do what ever it takes to make a profit and ride that pony for all it is worth until it gets caught. I believe for many years Californians have believed that they live in heaven, a place where every thing can be made perfectly safe, clean, and with out hazard. May I assure you, they are not in heaven and they are the recipients of enormous amounts of deception.. They have been sold a bill of goods which they cannot afford. |
#4
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
Keith Nuttle wrote:
On 6/8/2013 1:03 AM, Lew Hodgett wrote: Southern California Edison has finally announced the San Onofre nuclear plant will be permanently shut down. The arrogance of SCE was typical of the "We know best" attitude of the utility industry found in some parts of the country. The San Onofre nuclear plant was an inferior design according to industry watchdogs that SCE tried to get recertified when it leaked without submitting to the certifying process. They were finally brought into submission. To put things in perspective, there are over 8 million people living with in 50 miles of San Onofre. Now for the plant's demolition, but leaving accumulated nuclear waste within 100 yards of the Pacific Ocean is not an option. There is still a lot of work ahead to properly dispose of all the waste material accumulated over the years and not allow San Onofre to become an ocean side nuclear dump after the plant's demolition. SCE will try to cut corners, that is their track record. Vigilance to keep them under control will be vital. Off the stump. Lew Thank GOD, we have people in the Carolinas that are not afraid of Nuclear Energy and have trained knowledgeable people to run them in a safe manner. We have several plants that are online producing clean, environmental-friendly energy. They are not killing birds, creating noise in all frequencies. They are not taking up acres and acres of sunbaked land with no trees. We recently had a power plant problem. They found a small crack in a pipe going to the reactor. They shut the plant down, fixed it and restarted it. Several years ago we lived within 10 miles of one. Never did it affect our lives in a negative way. The large lake created for the cooling system was leased to the city and was a beautiful park with waking trails, picnic areas, etc. The lake itself was one of the best fishing lakes in the area. It is nice to know we have a reliable source of energy to run our air conditioners this summer, that will run day and night. That is not dependent on the wind which may be blowing over 100 mph during a hurricane one day, and the next be so weak that they will not move my small sailboat. So you let them bury the nuclear waste in your backyard? -- PV If you could choose one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor. -Jennifer Jones |
#5
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 08:34:00 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote:
Thank GOD, we have people in the Carolinas that are not afraid of Nuclear Energy and have trained knowledgeable people to run them in a safe manner. I used to be a strong supporter of nuclear power. Then I did some software for a couple of nuclear plants. After listening to the managers and watching the "trained" people for a couple of months, I changed my mind. -- When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross. |
#6
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On Sat, 8 Jun 2013 15:35:58 +0000 (UTC), Larry Blanchard
I used to be a strong supporter of nuclear power. Then I did some software for a couple of nuclear plants. After listening to the managers and watching the "trained" people for a couple of months, I changed my mind. So, what did you see? People lurching from one problem to another? |
#7
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On 6/8/2013 10:09 AM, PV wrote:
Keith Nuttle wrote: On 6/8/2013 1:03 AM, Lew Hodgett wrote: Southern California Edison has finally announced the San Onofre nuclear plant will be permanently shut down. The arrogance of SCE was typical of the "We know best" attitude of the utility industry found in some parts of the country. The San Onofre nuclear plant was an inferior design according to industry watchdogs that SCE tried to get recertified when it leaked without submitting to the certifying process. They were finally brought into submission. To put things in perspective, there are over 8 million people living with in 50 miles of San Onofre. Now for the plant's demolition, but leaving accumulated nuclear waste within 100 yards of the Pacific Ocean is not an option. There is still a lot of work ahead to properly dispose of all the waste material accumulated over the years and not allow San Onofre to become an ocean side nuclear dump after the plant's demolition. SCE will try to cut corners, that is their track record. Vigilance to keep them under control will be vital. Off the stump. Lew Thank GOD, we have people in the Carolinas that are not afraid of Nuclear Energy and have trained knowledgeable people to run them in a safe manner. We have several plants that are online producing clean, environmental-friendly energy. They are not killing birds, creating noise in all frequencies. They are not taking up acres and acres of sunbaked land with no trees. We recently had a power plant problem. They found a small crack in a pipe going to the reactor. They shut the plant down, fixed it and restarted it. Several years ago we lived within 10 miles of one. Never did it affect our lives in a negative way. The large lake created for the cooling system was leased to the city and was a beautiful park with waking trails, picnic areas, etc. The lake itself was one of the best fishing lakes in the area. It is nice to know we have a reliable source of energy to run our air conditioners this summer, that will run day and night. That is not dependent on the wind which may be blowing over 100 mph during a hurricane one day, and the next be so weak that they will not move my small sailboat. So you let them bury the nuclear waste in your backyard? Probably ends up in NM or Washington State. |
#8
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On 6/8/2013 10:35 AM, Larry Blanchard wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 08:34:00 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote: Thank GOD, we have people in the Carolinas that are not afraid of Nuclear Energy and have trained knowledgeable people to run them in a safe manner. I used to be a strong supporter of nuclear power. Then I did some software for a couple of nuclear plants. After listening to the managers and watching the "trained" people for a couple of months, I changed my mind. Ever think it might have been the software? :~) |
#9
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
Leon wrote:
On 6/8/2013 10:09 AM, PV wrote: Keith Nuttle wrote: On 6/8/2013 1:03 AM, Lew Hodgett wrote: Southern California Edison has finally announced the San Onofre nuclear plant will be permanently shut down. The arrogance of SCE was typical of the "We know best" attitude of the utility industry found in some parts of the country. The San Onofre nuclear plant was an inferior design according to industry watchdogs that SCE tried to get recertified when it leaked without submitting to the certifying process. They were finally brought into submission. To put things in perspective, there are over 8 million people living with in 50 miles of San Onofre. Now for the plant's demolition, but leaving accumulated nuclear waste within 100 yards of the Pacific Ocean is not an option. There is still a lot of work ahead to properly dispose of all the waste material accumulated over the years and not allow San Onofre to become an ocean side nuclear dump after the plant's demolition. SCE will try to cut corners, that is their track record. Vigilance to keep them under control will be vital. Off the stump. Lew Thank GOD, we have people in the Carolinas that are not afraid of Nuclear Energy and have trained knowledgeable people to run them in a safe manner. We have several plants that are online producing clean, environmental-friendly energy. They are not killing birds, creating noise in all frequencies. They are not taking up acres and acres of sunbaked land with no trees. We recently had a power plant problem. They found a small crack in a pipe going to the reactor. They shut the plant down, fixed it and restarted it. Several years ago we lived within 10 miles of one. Never did it affect our lives in a negative way. The large lake created for the cooling system was leased to the city and was a beautiful park with waking trails, picnic areas, etc. The lake itself was one of the best fishing lakes in the area. It is nice to know we have a reliable source of energy to run our air conditioners this summer, that will run day and night. That is not dependent on the wind which may be blowing over 100 mph during a hurricane one day, and the next be so weak that they will not move my small sailboat. So you let them bury the nuclear waste in your backyard? Probably ends up in NM or Washington State. It's always great to have a "reliable source of energy" when you can pawn the waste off on another place. Waste that will be hot for a long long time. -- PV If you could choose one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor. -Jennifer Jones |
#10
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
"Leon" wrote: I wonder if California's over the top restrictions and regulations are the source of the problems. ----------------------------------------------------------- This was driven by the feds (NRC). SCE finally realized they were not going to be able to stonewall this one away. ----------------------------------------------------------- I mean really, my new yard sprinkler which is also sold in California has to have cancer warning labels because something in it may or may not cause cancer in "1 in 1,000,000,000,000" test critters. The regulations seem to be so far fetched and absurd that a "legitimate" producer simply can not operate and make a profit. So what you end up with is a business environment that is too hostile for production. As a result it appears that the ones that do operate under the "California restrictions" and are producers of "whatever" probably hide the fact, or not, that they have to cut corners at every possible step. And because of the over bearing restrictions the businesses that could possibly do a better job and make a sustainable profit simply feel that life is too short to do business in California. This leaves you with the type of businesses you rant about, those that don't care about their image, those that will lie and hide what is really going on, those that do what ever it takes to make a profit and ride that pony for all it is worth until it gets caught. I believe for many years Californians have believed that they live in heaven, a place where every thing can be made perfectly safe, clean, and with out hazard. May I assure you, they are not in heaven and they are the recipients of enormous amounts of deception.. They have been sold a bill of goods which they cannot afford. ------------------------------------------------------------- Is there an echo chamber in here? That's the standard line we keep hearing from the chief idiot sitting in your governor's chair, when he trys to raid a few marginal businesses under the guise of a "trade junket". Regardless of all the bitching, California still has an economy that is in the world's top six economies. Must be doing something right. Lew |
#11
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On 6/8/2013 6:26 PM, Lew Hodgett wrote:
I wonder if California's over the top restrictions and regulations are the source of the problems. ----------------------------------------------------------- This was driven by the feds (NRC). SCE finally realized they were not going to be able to stonewall this one away. The Feds are not responsible for the restrictive regulations in California. In my experience with Regulation, California is many times more restrictive than the Feds or any other state regulations. An example is trace contaminates in food and food substances. When I was working daily with regulations, California regulations were basically if you can detect a compound you must provide proof that it is safe. This is counter to the American law, which is that you are innocent until proof guilty. At least it was until 2008. |
#12
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On 6/8/2013 11:09 AM, PV wrote:
Keith Nuttle wrote: On 6/8/2013 1:03 AM, Lew Hodgett wrote: Southern California Edison has finally announced the San Onofre nuclear plant will be permanently shut down. The arrogance of SCE was typical of the "We know best" attitude of the utility industry found in some parts of the country. The San Onofre nuclear plant was an inferior design according to industry watchdogs that SCE tried to get recertified when it leaked without submitting to the certifying process. They were finally brought into submission. To put things in perspective, there are over 8 million people living with in 50 miles of San Onofre. Now for the plant's demolition, but leaving accumulated nuclear waste within 100 yards of the Pacific Ocean is not an option. There is still a lot of work ahead to properly dispose of all the waste material accumulated over the years and not allow San Onofre to become an ocean side nuclear dump after the plant's demolition. SCE will try to cut corners, that is their track record. Vigilance to keep them under control will be vital. Off the stump. Lew Thank GOD, we have people in the Carolinas that are not afraid of Nuclear Energy and have trained knowledgeable people to run them in a safe manner. We have several plants that are online producing clean, environmental-friendly energy. They are not killing birds, creating noise in all frequencies. They are not taking up acres and acres of sunbaked land with no trees. We recently had a power plant problem. They found a small crack in a pipe going to the reactor. They shut the plant down, fixed it and restarted it. Several years ago we lived within 10 miles of one. Never did it affect our lives in a negative way. The large lake created for the cooling system was leased to the city and was a beautiful park with waking trails, picnic areas, etc. The lake itself was one of the best fishing lakes in the area. It is nice to know we have a reliable source of energy to run our air conditioners this summer, that will run day and night. That is not dependent on the wind which may be blowing over 100 mph during a hurricane one day, and the next be so weak that they will not move my small sailboat. So you let them bury the nuclear waste in your backyard? If the restrictive regulations had not been employed to drive nuclear power out of existence, there would be no waste to bury. It is against the law to try to reclaim nuclear waste. If the Chemist and Physicist had been allowed to solve the problem in the last 40 years, the raw material that we are currently are burying from nuclear plants would be used to produce additional energy. |
#13
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On 6/8/2013 7:53 PM, Keith Nuttle wrote:
On 6/8/2013 11:09 AM, PV wrote: Keith Nuttle wrote: On 6/8/2013 1:03 AM, Lew Hodgett wrote: Southern California Edison has finally announced the San Onofre nuclear plant will be permanently shut down. The arrogance of SCE was typical of the "We know best" attitude of the utility industry found in some parts of the country. The San Onofre nuclear plant was an inferior design according to industry watchdogs that SCE tried to get recertified when it leaked without submitting to the certifying process. They were finally brought into submission. To put things in perspective, there are over 8 million people living with in 50 miles of San Onofre. Now for the plant's demolition, but leaving accumulated nuclear waste within 100 yards of the Pacific Ocean is not an option. There is still a lot of work ahead to properly dispose of all the waste material accumulated over the years and not allow San Onofre to become an ocean side nuclear dump after the plant's demolition. SCE will try to cut corners, that is their track record. Vigilance to keep them under control will be vital. Off the stump. Lew Thank GOD, we have people in the Carolinas that are not afraid of Nuclear Energy and have trained knowledgeable people to run them in a safe manner. We have several plants that are online producing clean, environmental-friendly energy. They are not killing birds, creating noise in all frequencies. They are not taking up acres and acres of sunbaked land with no trees. We recently had a power plant problem. They found a small crack in a pipe going to the reactor. They shut the plant down, fixed it and restarted it. Several years ago we lived within 10 miles of one. Never did it affect our lives in a negative way. The large lake created for the cooling system was leased to the city and was a beautiful park with waking trails, picnic areas, etc. The lake itself was one of the best fishing lakes in the area. It is nice to know we have a reliable source of energy to run our air conditioners this summer, that will run day and night. That is not dependent on the wind which may be blowing over 100 mph during a hurricane one day, and the next be so weak that they will not move my small sailboat. So you let them bury the nuclear waste in your backyard? If the restrictive regulations had not been employed to drive nuclear power out of existence, there would be no waste to bury. It is against the law to try to reclaim nuclear waste. If the Chemist and Physicist had been allowed to solve the problem in the last 40 years, the raw material that we are currently are burying from nuclear plants would be used to produce additional energy. Here is a general article about the technology of processing materials coming from a nuclear plant. Because of Jimmy Carter, a knowledgeable democrat, it can not be used in the US. |
#14
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On 6/8/2013 8:11 PM, Keith Nuttle wrote:
Here is a general article about the technology of processing materials coming from a nuclear plant. Because of Jimmy Carter, a knowledgeable democrat, it can not be used in the US. http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2009/05...pagewanted=all |
#15
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 13:14:03 -0500, Leon wrote:
Ever think it might have been the software? :~) No, because it never got used. We were informed that the NRC required it, therefore they had to have it - but they had no intention of using it. That's when I started getting worried. -- When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross. |
#16
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 13:09:22 -0400, none wrote:
So, what did you see? People lurching from one problem to another? How about doors to critical areas locked with a keypad, but no way to tell how many entered or left on a single actuation? How about spills that were marked with tape on the floor instead of cleaned up. They did get cleaned up shortly before a congressional visit - at least the tape went away. How about monitoring software whose consoles were left unmanned? Operators were only required to have a high school diploma (or GED). Do you know how easy it has been to get a diploma in the last 20-30 years? -- When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross. |
#17
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
"Keith Nuttle" wrote: An example is trace contaminates in food and food substances. When I was working daily with regulations, California regulations were basically if you can detect a compound you must provide proof that it is safe. ----------------------------------------------- Seems perfectly reasonable to me. Guess a majority of the 38+ million people here in California seem to also agree. Lew |
#18
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
Keith Nuttle wrote:
On 6/8/2013 8:11 PM, Keith Nuttle wrote: Here is a general article about the technology of processing materials coming from a nuclear plant. Because of Jimmy Carter, a knowledgeable democrat, it can not be used in the US. http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2009/05...pagewanted=all Far from a definitive solution to the problem plus it's 4 years old, and in the meantime the stockpile of waste continues to grow but that's okay and you can ship it somewhere else to be disposed of while you enjoy dependable air conditioning -- PV If you could choose one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor. -Jennifer Jones |
#19
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On 6/8/2013 8:25 PM, Larry Blanchard wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 13:09:22 -0400, none wrote: So, what did you see? People lurching from one problem to another? How about doors to critical areas locked with a keypad, but no way to tell how many entered or left on a single actuation? How about spills that were marked with tape on the floor instead of cleaned up. They did get cleaned up shortly before a congressional visit - at least the tape went away. How about monitoring software whose consoles were left unmanned? Operators were only required to have a high school diploma (or GED). Do you know how easy it has been to get a diploma in the last 20-30 years? If the software were any good and problems occurred, alarms would be sent to all consoles so all consoles would not need be manned. The problem with many people in the US is they run of and make critical decision without a complete knowledge of the situation. How many times have you heard people complaining about a company making a billion dollars profit, and do not consider the fact that the company has 50 billion in sales, or making 2% profit. |
#20
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
In article ,
PV edrnouser@ spam telus.net wrote: It's always great to have a "reliable source of energy" when you can pawn the waste off on another place. Waste that will be hot for a long long time. Damage and deaths from coal burning air pollution and fly ash waste containment accidents dwarf anything caused to date from nuclear waste in the USA. -- Often wrong, never in doubt. Larry W. - Baltimore Maryland - lwasserm(a)sdf. lonestar. org |
#21
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On 6/8/2013 10:38 PM, Lew Hodgett wrote:
"Keith Nuttle" wrote: An example is trace contaminates in food and food substances. When I was working daily with regulations, California regulations were basically if you can detect a compound you must provide proof that it is safe. ----------------------------------------------- Seems perfectly reasonable to me. Guess a majority of the 38+ million people here in California seem to also agree. Lew To emphasis what I said let me say: "I sorry that there are that many people in California who think that way". Maybe the state would not be near bankrupt if the people were more reasonable. |
#22
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
"Lew Hodgett" wrote:
"Keith Nuttle" wrote: An example is trace contaminates in food and food substances. When I was working daily with regulations, California regulations were basically if you can detect a compound you must provide proof that it is safe. ----------------------------------------------- Seems perfectly reasonable to me. Guess a majority of the 38+ million people here in California seem to also agree. Lew And the answer to why the people in California are in the situation that hey are in. I have to think that it is difficult to see the Forrest for the trees considering all hurdles you seem to constantly have to jump. |
#23
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
Larry W wrote:
In article , PV edrnouser@ spam telus.net wrote: It's always great to have a "reliable source of energy" when you can pawn the waste off on another place. Waste that will be hot for a long long time. Damage and deaths from coal burning air pollution and fly ash waste containment accidents dwarf anything caused to date from nuclear waste in the USA. Installation of scrubbing units, improvements in coal burning techniques and using fly ash waste as a concrete reinforcment has cleaned up the coal fed power plants in the area. Nuclear waste would be hanging around for hundreds of years, waiting for a mistake to happen -- PV If you could choose one characteristic that would get you through life, choose a sense of humor. -Jennifer Jones |
#24
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
Leon wrote:
"Lew Hodgett" wrote: "Keith Nuttle" wrote: An example is trace contaminates in food and food substances. When I was working daily with regulations, California regulations were basically if you can detect a compound you must provide proof that it is safe. ----------------------------------------------- Seems perfectly reasonable to me. Guess a majority of the 38+ million people here in California seem to also agree. Lew And the answer to why the people in California are in the situation that hey are in. I have to think that it is difficult to see the Forrest for the trees considering all hurdles you seem to constantly have to jump. And if Lew agrees with them, why does he post his rant weekly about gas prices? Can't have it both ways, Lew. |
#25
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On 6/9/2013 1:16 PM, ChairMan wrote:
Leon wrote: "Lew Hodgett" wrote: "Keith Nuttle" wrote: An example is trace contaminates in food and food substances. When I was working daily with regulations, California regulations were basically if you can detect a compound you must provide proof that it is safe. ----------------------------------------------- Seems perfectly reasonable to me. Guess a majority of the 38+ million people here in California seem to also agree. Lew And the answer to why the people in California are in the situation that hey are in. I have to think that it is difficult to see the Forrest for the trees considering all hurdles you seem to constantly have to jump. And if Lew agrees with them, why does he post his rant weekly about gas prices? Can't have it both ways, Lew. It must not be as rosy in California as the residents would want you to believe. They do complain a lot and have restrictions upon restrictions. |
#26
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 07:44:08 -0400, Keith Nuttle wrote:
If the software were any good and problems occurred, alarms would be sent to all consoles so all consoles would not need be manned. The problem with many people in the US is they run of and make critical decision without a complete knowledge of the situation. I think your second sentence explains your first one quite well :-). -- When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross. -- When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross. |
#27
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
In ,
Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet belched: On 6/9/2013 1:16 PM, ChairMan wrote: Leon wrote: "Lew Hodgett" wrote: "Keith Nuttle" wrote: An example is trace contaminates in food and food substances. When I was working daily with regulations, California regulations were basically if you can detect a compound you must provide proof that it is safe. ----------------------------------------------- Seems perfectly reasonable to me. Guess a majority of the 38+ million people here in California seem to also agree. Lew And the answer to why the people in California are in the situation that hey are in. I have to think that it is difficult to see the Forrest for the trees considering all hurdles you seem to constantly have to jump. And if Lew agrees with them, why does he post his rant weekly about gas prices? Can't have it both ways, Lew. It must not be as rosy in California as the residents would want you to believe. They do complain a lot and have restrictions upon restrictions. California is a beautiful state , but the folks in the capitol have ruined it. Companies are leaving in droves because of it, it's a shame they can't use a little common sense, but that seems to be a trait that politicans don't possess |
#28
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
"Keith Nuttle" wrote: To emphasis what I said let me say: "I sorry that there are that many people in California who think that way". Maybe the state would not be near bankrupt if the people were more reasonable. ------------------------------------------------ You're working with stale data. CA is back in the black. Lew |
#29
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
"Leon" wrote: And the answer to why the people in California are in the situation that hey are in. I have to think that it is difficult to see the Forrest for the trees considering all hurdles you seem to constantly have to jump. ----------------------------------------------- As posted elsewhere, you're working with stale data. CA is back in the black. Lew |
#30
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
"ChairMan" wrote: And if Lew agrees with them, why does he post his rant weekly about gas prices? Can't have it both ways, Lew. -------------------------------------------- The post simply points out the obvious, there is a better ways to get energy than by burning hydrocarbon based fuels. Lew |
#31
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 15:36:44 -0500, "ChairMan"
wrote: California is a beautiful state , but the folks in the capitol have ruined it. Companies are leaving in droves because of it, it's a shame they can't use a little common sense, but that seems to be a trait that politicans don't possess That statement could just as easily be applied to other places. The fist one that comes to my mind is the province of Quebec. |
#32
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
|
#33
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On 6/8/2013 2:25 PM, PV wrote:
Leon wrote: On 6/8/2013 10:09 AM, PV wrote: Keith Nuttle wrote: On 6/8/2013 1:03 AM, Lew Hodgett wrote: Southern California Edison has finally announced the San Onofre nuclear plant will be permanently shut down. The arrogance of SCE was typical of the "We know best" attitude of the utility industry found in some parts of the country. The San Onofre nuclear plant was an inferior design according to industry watchdogs that SCE tried to get recertified when it leaked without submitting to the certifying process. They were finally brought into submission. To put things in perspective, there are over 8 million people living with in 50 miles of San Onofre. Now for the plant's demolition, but leaving accumulated nuclear waste within 100 yards of the Pacific Ocean is not an option. There is still a lot of work ahead to properly dispose of all the waste material accumulated over the years and not allow San Onofre to become an ocean side nuclear dump after the plant's demolition. SCE will try to cut corners, that is their track record. Vigilance to keep them under control will be vital. Off the stump. Lew Thank GOD, we have people in the Carolinas that are not afraid of Nuclear Energy and have trained knowledgeable people to run them in a safe manner. We have several plants that are online producing clean, environmental-friendly energy. They are not killing birds, creating noise in all frequencies. They are not taking up acres and acres of sunbaked land with no trees. We recently had a power plant problem. They found a small crack in a pipe going to the reactor. They shut the plant down, fixed it and restarted it. Several years ago we lived within 10 miles of one. Never did it affect our lives in a negative way. The large lake created for the cooling system was leased to the city and was a beautiful park with waking trails, picnic areas, etc. The lake itself was one of the best fishing lakes in the area. It is nice to know we have a reliable source of energy to run our air conditioners this summer, that will run day and night. That is not dependent on the wind which may be blowing over 100 mph during a hurricane one day, and the next be so weak that they will not move my small sailboat. So you let them bury the nuclear waste in your backyard? Probably ends up in NM or Washington State. It's always great to have a "reliable source of energy" when you can pawn the waste off on another place. Waste that will be hot for a long long time. I have often wondered why the nuclear waste is not shot off into outer space. |
#34
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 19:07:30 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
I have often wondered why the nuclear waste is not shot off into outer space. My guess would be cost. Much, Much cheaper to just stick it in a hole in the ground. |
#35
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On 6/9/2013 6:44 AM, Keith Nuttle wrote:
On 6/8/2013 8:25 PM, Larry Blanchard wrote: On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 13:09:22 -0400, none wrote: So, what did you see? People lurching from one problem to another? How about doors to critical areas locked with a keypad, but no way to tell how many entered or left on a single actuation? How about spills that were marked with tape on the floor instead of cleaned up. They did get cleaned up shortly before a congressional visit - at least the tape went away. How about monitoring software whose consoles were left unmanned? Operators were only required to have a high school diploma (or GED). Do you know how easy it has been to get a diploma in the last 20-30 years? If the software were any good and problems occurred, alarms would be sent to all consoles so all consoles would not need be manned. The problem with many people in the US is they run of and make critical decision without a complete knowledge of the situation. How many times have you heard people complaining about a company making a billion dollars profit, and do not consider the fact that the company has 50 billion in sales, or making 2% profit. LOL Really, My sister and her son have both been involved in their own small businesses. My sister gets by but her son has never been successful. Both have bragged about their yearly sales, which BTW is about equal to an average gross salary. What they don't realize I am wondering is how much their cost of materials and cost of doing business is coming out of those sales. If you have $60,000 in sales and your cost is $45,000 can you live on $15,000 per year? |
#36
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
|
#37
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 19:24:47 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
I can assure you a politician is getting paid for letting his state accept/be paid for housing the materials. Shoot the waste into outer space and the politician gets nothing. We're not prepared to make the effort to use a cleaner source of energy and we're not prepared to keep its waste product on our planet so the solution is to put it off planet and potentially contaminate somewhere out of this world? I don't know. I have a moral problem with that. Already, our nearby space is turning into a junk field. What if all that junk and possible nuclear waste ever comes back to home? Then we might have a REAL problem. |
#39
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
"Lew Hodgett" wrote:
"Leon" wrote: And the answer to why the people in California are in the situation that hey are in. I have to think that it is difficult to see the Forrest for the trees considering all hurdles you seem to constantly have to jump. ----------------------------------------------- As posted elsewhere, you're working with stale data. CA is back in the black. Lew I'm sure you actually believe that. |
#40
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
O/T: San Onofre
As I heard it - it is checker-board black and red.
They dumped a lot of bills on the counties to pay and have stolen a lot of counties money (law allows it), taxed the fool out of folks and has a balance in this years take, but not in the total RED mess they are into for many years. CA is debt deep they are. Martin On 6/9/2013 5:18 PM, Lew Hodgett wrote: "Leon" wrote: And the answer to why the people in California are in the situation that hey are in. I have to think that it is difficult to see the Forrest for the trees considering all hurdles you seem to constantly have to jump. ----------------------------------------------- As posted elsewhere, you're working with stale data. CA is back in the black. Lew |