Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Damage noted," he said.
http://photobucket.com/albums/d160/G...t=3e1f11ee.jpg The glasses made it fine, even though someone packing for Lee Valley threw a cast iron gingerbread pan in to bounce about and bash the other items. A bit of bubble wrap would have been nice, but newsprint - now tightly compressed - was all they used. Lots of dust, too. Fed Ex sure learned a lot from the USPS. Worst part - none of it was for me.... |
#2
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"George" George@least wrote in message ... "Damage noted," he said. http://photobucket.com/albums/d160/G...t=3e1f11ee.jpg The glasses made it fine, even though someone packing for Lee Valley threw a cast iron gingerbread pan in to bounce about and bash the other items. A bit of bubble wrap would have been nice, but newsprint - now tightly compressed - was all they used. Lots of dust, too. Fed Ex sure learned a lot from the USPS. Worst part - none of it was for me.... The packing job was simply not up to the task. "LeeValley" tape is way too short over the ends and the box is too light. I'm surprised. |
#3
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Battleax" wrote in message
The packing job was simply not up to the task. "LeeValley" tape is way too short over the ends and the box is too light. I'm surprised. Product arrived with no damage. Packaging worked perfectly. The standard for tape over the end is 2" Anything more is a waste of tape. Plain paper tape must be in an H pattern, but reinforced tape is OK with one strip. Carton is to specifications as required by UPS and the NSTA. |
#4
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message m... "Battleax" wrote in message The packing job was simply not up to the task. "LeeValley" tape is way too short over the ends and the box is too light. I'm surprised. Product arrived with no damage. Packaging worked perfectly. The standard for tape over the end is 2" Anything more is a waste of tape. Plain paper tape must be in an H pattern, but reinforced tape is OK with one strip. Carton is to specifications as required by UPS and the NSTA. Well that box wouldn't have made it much further. It may be to someone's specification but it's not good enough |
#5
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:38:02 -0500, "George" George@least wrote:
Worst part - none of it was for me.... Maybe this will teach you a lesson about ordering from LV and not getting something for yourself. I can't believe you'd publicly admit to such a thing. -Leuf |
#6
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Battleax" wrote in message ... "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message m... "Battleax" wrote in message The packing job was simply not up to the task. "LeeValley" tape is way too short over the ends and the box is too light. I'm surprised. Product arrived with no damage. Packaging worked perfectly. The standard for tape over the end is 2" Anything more is a waste of tape. Plain paper tape must be in an H pattern, but reinforced tape is OK with one strip. Carton is to specifications as required by UPS and the NSTA. Well that box wouldn't have made it much further. It may be to someone's specification but it's not good enough For a lot of years, I'd get tools shipped from Taiwan (pre-mainland) to the West Coast to here, about a 6000 mile journey. I'd then have to repack and return the tools after testing. Biggest problem: the original cartons were designed to go 6000 miles. They might make 6500. Ask them for 9000, and the contents would spill out all over something or other. So I too often had to rebuild the cartons out of tape and cardboard. You used to be able to pretty much pinpoint the origin from the color of the corrugated cardboard. The Asian cardboard had a really nasty yellowish color. I have no idea what the differences in the mixtures were, or are, but the current cartons are 100% better, even from the mainland Chinese factories. The Taiwanese tools are at least 100% better, too. |
#7
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Battleax" wrote in message
... Well that box wouldn't have made it much further. It may be to someone's specification but it's not good enough Not good enough for what? As I said befo Product arrived with no damage. Packaging worked perfectly. Nothing else matters. Nothing. Seems to me it is the ideal cost effective package and it did the job it was supposed to do. Nothing else matters. (BTW, I've been involved in the packaging industry for 35 years. The goal is for the product to arrive intact.) |
#8
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 11:07:28 GMT, "Charles Self"
wrote: You used to be able to pretty much pinpoint the origin from the color of the corrugated cardboard. The Asian cardboard had a really nasty yellowish color. I have no idea what the differences in the mixtures were, You should have seen '70s-'80s Soviet cardboard. Nothing else like it. it wasn't too bad when it was dry, it was thicker than anyone else's ,because it was the only way to get any strength. Wet though, the stuff was like soggy tissue. It must have been recycled out of old recyclings and the fibres were just too short to have any wet strength left. |
#9
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Andy Dingley" wrote in message ... You should have seen '70s-'80s Soviet cardboard. Nothing else like it. it wasn't too bad when it was dry, it was thicker than anyone else's ,because it was the only way to get any strength. Wet though, the stuff was like soggy tissue. It must have been recycled out of old recyclings and the fibres were just too short to have any wet strength left. Ever notice that any book printed on slick paper, much less coated, was printed in Finland, not USSR? They were cheap, of course. |
#10
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message m... "Battleax" wrote in message ... Well that box wouldn't have made it much further. It may be to someone's specification but it's not good enough Not good enough for what? As I said befo Product arrived with no damage. Packaging worked perfectly. Nothing else matters. Nothing. Seems to me it is the ideal cost effective package and it did the job it was supposed to do. Nothing else matters. (BTW, I've been involved in the packaging industry for 35 years. The goal is for the product to arrive intact.) Would you have packaged an eight-pound piece of iron unrestrained in a package containing glasses and bubble-wrapped plastic items? Sorry, this is in the dumb luck category, not the good enough |
#11
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message m... "Battleax" wrote in message ... Well that box wouldn't have made it much further. It may be to someone's specification but it's not good enough Not good enough for what? As I said befo Product arrived with no damage. Packaging worked perfectly. Nothing else matters. Nothing. Seems to me it is the ideal cost effective package and it did the job it was supposed to do. Nothing else matters. (BTW, I've been involved in the packaging industry for 35 years. The goal is for the product to arrive intact.) It did what it was supposed to by plain luck, it's a crap packing job. |
#12
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
Ba r r y wrote: ... On the other hand, I'm surprised that none of the manufacturers build decent reusable containers for demo and review machines, like the stuff that gets shipped to Charlie or FWW. It would seem that some sort of reusable flight case or crate would help their machines travel safely. Once a machine has done the rounds, they could always refit the case for a similar tool. I used to work for a group at NASA'a Goddard Space Flight Center that used radio telescopes all over the world. As part of that project we loaned some of the equipment that was used for the observing campaigns and had custom-made reusable shipping containers built of plywood for that equipment. At one of our weekly meetings we were informed that shipping of something ( ISTR it was an atomic clock) from Hat Creek, California to Arecibo, Puerto Rico, was delayed because the porcupines had eaten the packing crates. -- FF |
#13
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"George" George@least wrote in message Would you have packaged an eight-pound piece of iron unrestrained in a package containing glasses and bubble-wrapped plastic items? Sorry, this is in the dumb luck category, not the good enough Nothing damaged. The packaging did its job. Does it look pretty? Probably not, but there is no damage, no harm, no loss of anything. Life is good. By glasses, do you mean the dozen beer glasses that have been on test for 20 years? Very nice, I like them. Last year, mine arrived in the same package as my 30 pound vice and yes, nothing was broken. |
#14
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Ba r r y" wrote in message ... On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 11:25:57 GMT, "Edwin Pawlowski" wrote: "Battleax" wrote in message .. . Well that box wouldn't have made it much further. It may be to someone's specification but it's not good enough Not good enough for what? As I said befo Product arrived with no damage. Packaging worked perfectly. Nothing else matters. Nothing. Seems to me it is the ideal cost effective package and it did the job it was supposed to do. Nothing else matters. (BTW, I've been involved in the packaging industry for 35 years. The goal is for the product to arrive intact.) There seems to be a consumer belief that if the one-time use box has any visible damage, it wasn't a good package. A package with crumple zones and impact absorbing material is far better than a "strong" box. I've unpacked plenty of broken goods from perfect boxes. On the other hand, I'm surprised that none of the manufacturers build decent reusable containers for demo and review machines, like the stuff that gets shipped to Charlie or FWW. It would seem that some sort of reusable flight case or crate would help their machines travel safely. Once a machine has done the rounds, they could always refit the case for a similar tool. Well, the machines I just shipped back were all in wooden crates, including one that was framed in steel. But those are still one time use crates, though one helluvan improvement over what I was getting just five years ago. Part of this is probably economy. Part of it is simply to indicate that there are no special tricks applied to the tools to be reviewed. Unopened packages of standard design. And, honestly, with on jointer that just went back, I would not WANT the crate any heavier. It comes assembled, and is claimed to weigh about 750 pounds crated, about 100 pounds less uncrated. More like 875 pounds crated, I think. But even if it's only 800, that's more than sufficient for two fat old guys to unload, uncrate and fiddle with and recrate and return. Like to killed our sorry butts even with my wife helping on the outbound leg...always marry a farm girl. They know how to work. |
#15
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message news:3iFjf.3422$R02.574@trndny06... "George" George@least wrote in message Would you have packaged an eight-pound piece of iron unrestrained in a package containing glasses and bubble-wrapped plastic items? Sorry, this is in the dumb luck category, not the good enough Nothing damaged. The packaging did its job. Does it look pretty? Probably not, but there is no damage, no harm, no loss of anything. Life is good. By glasses, do you mean the dozen beer glasses that have been on test for 20 years? Very nice, I like them. Last year, mine arrived in the same package as my 30 pound vice and yes, nothing was broken. That's them. Smashed along one side, but the box they were in didn't deform so much that they crushed. Had it been the top versus the bottom that crushed - well who knows. Hope their durability continues. They're for the kids, who are still slim enough to drink beer. |
#16
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 16:36:33 GMT, "Charles Self"
wrote: Like to killed our sorry butts even with my wife helping on the outbound leg...always marry a farm girl. They know how to work. Amen, Brother! Farm girls are the best, not only do they know how to work but they have other attributes as well - some of which can be discussed in a public forum. I married one of the best of the breed and haven't paid for beef in almost 20 years! -- "We need to make a sacrifice to the gods, find me a young virgin... oh, and bring something to kill" Tim Douglass http://www.DouglassClan.com |
#17
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Ba r r y" wrote in message ... On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 16:36:33 GMT, "Charles Self" wrote: And, honestly, with on jointer that just went back, I would not WANT the crate any heavier. It comes assembled, and is claimed to weigh about 750 pounds crated, about 100 pounds less uncrated. Well-built Calzone or Anvil cases can be surprisingly light. Barry Yeah, but...this crate was well built, but it was also about 1-1/2" shy of 8' long and over 2' wide, and, though I didn't check the height, it was tall, chest high to me...I'm not 6'2" any more, but I'm still over 6'. Rough guess has the crate weighing 150 pounds, minimum. And I added 2x4 runners so it would move on rollers. Those ran at right angles to the skid pieces, because I needed to get this sucker into my buddy's pick-up long ways. No way it would fit otherwise. While I had it on the engine crane--this may have been an inspired purchase nearly a decade ago for $140 or so--with the crate base bolted onto the jointer, I simply placed a runner on one side, blocked it solid and nailed, and repeated the process. After that, three of us could do the loading a lot more easily than two of us did the unloading. Suggestion for those making their own pipe rollers: 1-1/2" or 1-1/4" OD is best. 3/4" is nearly worthless. Six rollers will move just about anything, and make each roller about 42-43" long. |
#18
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:29:51 -0500, "George" George@least wrote:
Would you have packaged an eight-pound piece of iron unrestrained in a package containing glasses and bubble-wrapped plastic items? I once bought an anvil and some welding goggles from Northern Tools. I didn't even get the bubble wrap! |
#19
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Tim Douglass" wrote in message ... On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 16:36:33 GMT, "Charles Self" wrote: Like to killed our sorry butts even with my wife helping on the outbound leg...always marry a farm girl. They know how to work. Amen, Brother! Farm girls are the best, not only do they know how to work but they have other attributes as well - some of which can be discussed in a public forum. I married one of the best of the breed and haven't paid for beef in almost 20 years! Yeah. And not lazy. My wife isn't working right now, so she worked a garden, canned us about 50 quarts of green beans (not counting what we ate for months), did probably another two dozen for family, lots of other edibles, tomatoes until my mouth got sore from the acid, probably 40 quarts of tomatoes canned and remaining, I don't know how much strawberry preserves, peach preserves and blueberry preserves, but a lot. Plus zucchini, green peppers, red peppers, and a slew of other stuff. She also got some pick-ur-own apples and made applesauce and apple butter. Sort of like turning into my own grandfather, except I never had a dozen kids. Actually, I guess they had 14, one of those early 20th century farm families (my oldest uncle was born in 1900, straddled two centuries within a few months, as did my father, who was born the same year). Near Walton's Mountain (which doesn't exist), but, as my mother used to say, we had the sawmill and farm, and some of the kids got to college, but, as kids, none had a car, and there was a lot less noise and hassle, and money, around the house. |
#20
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
In article ,
Andy Dingley wrote: On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:29:51 -0500, "George" George@least wrote: Would you have packaged an eight-pound piece of iron unrestrained in a package containing glasses and bubble-wrapped plastic items? I once bought an anvil and some welding goggles from Northern Tools. I didn't even get the bubble wrap! Why am I developing images of Wiley E. Coyote? |
#21
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Battleax" wrote in message
It did what it was supposed to by plain luck, it's a crap packing job. Bottom line: it worked Good packaging job! |
#22
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message m... "Battleax" wrote in message It did what it was supposed to by plain luck, it's a crap packing job. Bottom line: it worked Good packaging job! I see your standards are considerably lower than mine |
#23
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Battleax" wrote in message I see your standards are considerably lower than mine Nope, my standards demand the product arrive intact. That is the goal of any package design. Once that is achieved, anything more is just plain wasted money. I guess you don't mind wasting yours on a pretty box that will get ground up on recycling day. No damage = good package. |
#24
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message ... "Battleax" wrote in message I see your standards are considerably lower than mine Nope, my standards demand the product arrive intact. That is the goal of any package design. Once that is achieved, anything more is just plain wasted money. I guess you don't mind wasting yours on a pretty box that will get ground up on recycling day. No damage = good package. Nothing is that black and white. In this case it was No damage = barely sufficient |
#25
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Battleax" wrote in message
Nothing is that black and white. In this case it was No damage = barely sufficient Perfectly black and white. No damage = sufficient. What more do you expect? Or want? It is either sufficient of not. Like being a little pregnant. |
#26
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
Edwin Pawlowski wrote: "Battleax" wrote in message Nothing is that black and white. In this case it was No damage = barely sufficient Perfectly black and white. No damage = sufficient. What more do you expect? Or want? A margin of safety would be nice. -- FF |
#27
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 14:54:17 GMT, "Edwin Pawlowski"
wrote: "Battleax" wrote in message Nothing is that black and white. In this case it was No damage = barely sufficient Perfectly black and white. No damage = sufficient. What more do you expect? Or want? It is either sufficient of not. Like being a little pregnant. A man picked up a beautiful woman in a bar and took her home. After several hours of incredible sex he lay beside her, exhausted and convinced from her responses that she had enjoyed it all as much as he had. Being a bit of an egotist, he asked her; "So, how was I?" "Adequate." "Adequate?! All that incredible sex and all you can say is I'm adequate?" "Well, would you rather be inadequate?" -- "We need to make a sacrifice to the gods, find me a young virgin... oh, and bring something to kill" Tim Douglass http://www.DouglassClan.com |
#28
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
wrote in message A margin of safety would be nice. I guess it was enough of a margin as there was no damage. There is standard testing that is done for packaging and you can have it tested for NSTA and UPS certification also. Most of it is overkill giving a good safety margin. . Some years ago a customer called me and said the packaging we provided failed their new drop test. I went along with a designer from our company and we met with his new QC guy and the president of the company that originally bought the package from us. The QC guy went on about the testing and the failure of the packaging in the test and what the specifications and reasoning behind the testing was. . After a lengthy diatribe, he was interrupted by President who asked two questions: Q. How many packages did we ship last year? A. Over 50,000 Q. How many were damaged A. None President: Thank you for coming. The meeting is over and we will have no need to re-assess our present packaging. It works. |
#29
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Ba r r y" wrote in message ... On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 16:36:33 GMT, "Charles Self" wrote: And, honestly, with on jointer that just went back, I would not WANT the crate any heavier. It comes assembled, and is claimed to weigh about 750 pounds crated, about 100 pounds less uncrated. Well-built Calzone or Anvil cases can be surprisingly light. Barry ===MMMmmmmh! Calzones. Just like momma used to make. Don't believe she shipped any, though!*G* Leif |
#30
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
Edwin Pawlowski wrote: wrote in message A margin of safety would be nice. I guess it was enough of a margin as there was no damage. I guess this turns on the meaning of 'sufficient'. 50,000 packages delivered with none damaged implies a sufficient margin of safety. -- FF |
#31
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
wrote in message ups.com... Edwin Pawlowski wrote: wrote in message A margin of safety would be nice. I guess it was enough of a margin as there was no damage. I guess this turns on the meaning of 'sufficient'. 50,000 packages delivered with none damaged implies a sufficient margin of safety. Ed has missed the point, you may not have seen it. The box was much too large for what it contained - probably by a factor of three or more. Since nothing was used to bulk it out, it was extremely vulnerable to damage from the outside. The box contained both a box of glasses and an eight pound piece of iron, both unrestrained within the oversize container. It's entirely possible that inertial forces acting on the chunk of iron during handling caused some of the problems observed. Impacts from inside also destroy the shape of the container, making it more vulnerable to exterior forces. Keeping the contents from shifting and damaging themselves or the container is really important in packaging. The two ways normally employed to accomplish this were not employed. The FRAGILE labels placed on the exterior almost seem a joke perpetrated on the carrier by the packager. Accidental success in no way justifies double dumb packaging, just as one swallow does not make a summer. |
#32
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"George" George@least wrote in message
Ed has missed the point, you may not have seen it. Accidental success in no way justifies double dumb packaging, just as one swallow does not make a summer. What point???? The product arrived unscathed. There is nothing more to do. Sure, the package could have been better in some respects for appearance, but, it worked, You can't get it to do anything more than that. Since it arrived in a box larger than needed, do you expect the glasses to multiply? Be filled with beer? A cake to be in the pan? Ribbons and bows? You ordered some items. They were shipped and arrived in perfect condition. The contract was fulfilled and payment was made. Perfect! You had no loss. Life is good. The only point is that you received what you asked for in perfect condition. Nothing else matters. You should have no more expectations. |
#33
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
wrote in message I guess this turns on the meaning of 'sufficient'. 50,000 packages delivered with none damaged implies a sufficient margin of safety. Exactly, but some idiot wanted a new design because if failed a trumped up "test" that was overkill. In real life, you do increase the margin of safety as the cost of the product goes up. If, out of 50,000 shipments of a $100 item you had three failures, that is not so bad. OTOH, if you had that many failures on a $75,000 item, you should be looking for the cause. It is not always packaging. I know of one instance with a computer company that was going to spend $20 per unit on a package and it was not working so they had a $50 unit designed. Then someone put a 5¢ screw in the part breaking lose and cut the packaging down to $15. |
#34
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in message t... "George" George@least wrote in message Ed has missed the point, you may not have seen it. Accidental success in no way justifies double dumb packaging, just as one swallow does not make a summer. What point???? The product arrived unscathed. There is nothing more to do. Sure, the package could have been better in some respects for appearance, but, it worked, You can't get it to do anything more than that. Since it arrived in a box larger than needed, do you expect the glasses to multiply? Be filled with beer? A cake to be in the pan? Ribbons and bows? You ordered some items. They were shipped and arrived in perfect condition. The contract was fulfilled and payment was made. Perfect! You had no loss. Life is good. The only point is that you received what you asked for in perfect condition. Nothing else matters. You should have no more expectations. It's still a ****ty packing job, plain and simple |
#35
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
If You Label, They Will Crush
"Battleax" wrote in message
It's still a ****ty packing job, plain and simple Does not have to look pretty to work. That costs extra. Nothing damaged, product intact, job well done. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crush Washers for Oil Pan - Substitutes? | Metalworking | |||
roovers label maker | Metalworking | |||
Crush washer orientation question | Metalworking | |||
READ THE DAMNED LABEL!!! | Home Repair | |||
Hardware Label | Woodworking |