Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Apprentices must really like bollockings
hugh wrote
Rod Speed wrote hugh wrote dennis@home wrote Jethro wrote My brother started off once, while I was still putting my seatbelt on. He'd got to about 10mph, and had to really slam the anchors on for some reason. Because I was looking down, and unprepared I went straight into the screen, and had a wonderful duck egg for weeks. I was amazed at how much force was involved. If it had happened at 30, I'm sure I would have gone through the screen. Just think what would happen if the air bag went off, you would be dead now. Air bags make it safer *if* you are seated correctly and kill you if you are leaning down. Air bags were first tried out as an alternative to seat belts - and were abandoned as dangerous to the point of being lethal. However later it was realised that they did work well in conjunction with seat belts. So the worst thing you can do is ride in a car with airbags without wearing the seat belt. You're a statistic waiting to happen. Not really. Modern air bags do work a lot better than nothing most of the time even if you dont wear a seatbelt. Either way you're probably dead in a shunt of any significance. Nope, they are pretty good at reducing the death rate. |
#82
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Apprentices must really like bollockings
Rod Speed wrote:
hugh wrote Rod Speed wrote hugh wrote dennis@home wrote Jethro wrote My brother started off once, while I was still putting my seatbelt on. He'd got to about 10mph, and had to really slam the anchors on for some reason. Because I was looking down, and unprepared I went straight into the screen, and had a wonderful duck egg for weeks. I was amazed at how much force was involved. If it had happened at 30, I'm sure I would have gone through the screen. Just think what would happen if the air bag went off, you would be dead now. Air bags make it safer *if* you are seated correctly and kill you if you are leaning down. Air bags were first tried out as an alternative to seat belts - and were abandoned as dangerous to the point of being lethal. However later it was realised that they did work well in conjunction with seat belts. So the worst thing you can do is ride in a car with airbags without wearing the seat belt. You're a statistic waiting to happen. Not really. Modern air bags do work a lot better than nothing most of the time even if you dont wear a seatbelt. Either way you're probably dead in a shunt of any significance. Nope, they are pretty good at reducing the death rate. Yes. The function of car safety measures like that is to spread the overall deceleration over enough area and time to reduce the general G loading below lethal, which is about 150-300g. Or if possible, below 50g, which is walk away bruised territory. -- To people who know nothing, anything is possible. To people who know too much, it is a sad fact that they know how little is really possible - and how hard it is to achieve it. |
#83
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Apprentices must really like bollockings
In message , Rod Speed
writes hugh wrote Rod Speed wrote hugh wrote dennis@home wrote Jethro wrote My brother started off once, while I was still putting my seatbelt on. He'd got to about 10mph, and had to really slam the anchors on for some reason. Because I was looking down, and unprepared I went straight into the screen, and had a wonderful duck egg for weeks. I was amazed at how much force was involved. If it had happened at 30, I'm sure I would have gone through the screen. Just think what would happen if the air bag went off, you would be dead now. Air bags make it safer *if* you are seated correctly and kill you if you are leaning down. Air bags were first tried out as an alternative to seat belts - and were abandoned as dangerous to the point of being lethal. However later it was realised that they did work well in conjunction with seat belts. So the worst thing you can do is ride in a car with airbags without wearing the seat belt. You're a statistic waiting to happen. Not really. Modern air bags do work a lot better than nothing most of the time even if you dont wear a seatbelt. Either way you're probably dead in a shunt of any significance. Nope, they are pretty good at reducing the death rate. Not when used on their own. That is why they were abandoned in the late 60s. -- hugh |
#84
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Apprentices must really like bollockings
hugh wrote
Rod Speed wrote hugh wrote Rod Speed wrote hugh wrote dennis@home wrote Jethro wrote My brother started off once, while I was still putting my seatbelt on. He'd got to about 10mph, and had to really slam the anchors on for some reason. Because I was looking down, and unprepared I went straight into the screen, and had a wonderful duck egg for weeks. I was amazed at how much force was involved. If it had happened at 30, I'm sure I would have gone through the screen. Just think what would happen if the air bag went off, you would be dead now. Air bags make it safer *if* you are seated correctly and kill you if you are leaning down. Air bags were first tried out as an alternative to seat belts - and were abandoned as dangerous to the point of being lethal. However later it was realised that they did work well in conjunction with seat belts. So the worst thing you can do is ride in a car with airbags without wearing the seat belt. You're a statistic waiting to happen. Not really. Modern air bags do work a lot better than nothing most of the time even if you dont wear a seatbelt. Either way you're probably dead in a shunt of any significance. Nope, they are pretty good at reducing the death rate. Not when used on their own. Yep, even then. That is why they were abandoned in the late 60s. Nope, they werent abandoned at all, they are there in all new cars, and still reduce the death rate even when the individual isnt wearing a seat belt. |
#85
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Apprentices must really like bollockings
In message , Rod Speed
writes hugh wrote Rod Speed wrote hugh wrote Rod Speed wrote hugh wrote dennis@home wrote Jethro wrote My brother started off once, while I was still putting my seatbelt on. He'd got to about 10mph, and had to really slam the anchors on for some reason. Because I was looking down, and unprepared I went straight into the screen, and had a wonderful duck egg for weeks. I was amazed at how much force was involved. If it had happened at 30, I'm sure I would have gone through the screen. Just think what would happen if the air bag went off, you would be dead now. Air bags make it safer *if* you are seated correctly and kill you if you are leaning down. Air bags were first tried out as an alternative to seat belts - and were abandoned as dangerous to the point of being lethal. However later it was realised that they did work well in conjunction with seat belts. So the worst thing you can do is ride in a car with airbags without wearing the seat belt. You're a statistic waiting to happen. Not really. Modern air bags do work a lot better than nothing most of the time even if you dont wear a seatbelt. Either way you're probably dead in a shunt of any significance. Nope, they are pretty good at reducing the death rate. Not when used on their own. Yep, even then. That is why they were abandoned in the late 60s. Nope, they werent abandoned at all, they are there in all new cars, and still reduce the death rate even when the individual isnt wearing a seat belt. Nope they were abandoned, seat belts were mad compulsary and much much later air bags were reintroduced as they were very effective when used in conjunction with a seat belt I know cos I was there End Of. -- hugh |
#86
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Apprentices must really like bollockings
"hugh" ] wrote in message ... Nope they were abandoned, seat belts were mad compulsary and much much later air bags were reintroduced as they were very effective when used in conjunction with a seat belt I know cos I was there End Of. You don't need seat belts for airbags to work. Look at side impact bags, the seat belt does sod all but the air bag still helps you to survive. What seat belts do is keep you out of the danger area when the bag goes off. Of course cost was a big reason why they weren't popular in the '60s. They were expensive and they didn't have microcontrollers to make them reliable. |
#87
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Apprentices must really like bollockings
dennis@home wrote:
"hugh" ] wrote in message ... Nope they were abandoned, seat belts were mad compulsary and much much later air bags were reintroduced as they were very effective when used in conjunction with a seat belt I know cos I was there End Of. You don't need seat belts for airbags to work. Look at side impact bags, the seat belt does sod all but the air bag still helps you to survive. What seat belts do is keep you out of the danger area when the bag goes off. Of course cost was a big reason why they weren't popular in the '60s. They were expensive and they didn't have microcontrollers to make them reliable. Indeed. airbags are a lessgood alternative to properly designed cars and proper seat belts, which is why no racing teams use them at all - its been shwon that proper side impacts test front impact tests, crumple zones and a full racing harness and a roll cage is how you get the BEST chance of survival. Nevertheless they are better than nothing if someone smacks into something with a sloppily tightened lap and diagonal, or no belts at all. It took me just one crash right in front of my eyes at a club motor race to decide that on balance, I would never ever drive without a seat belt again. Mini 70mph head on into a concrete wall with just two rows of tyres in between. I thought the driver was dead, but after a couple of seconds he smashed the door open, got out and hit the car in frustration - and walked away..just as the marshals arrived. OTOH I saw someone killed in front of me when he was thrown out of a vintage racing car with no belts at all - and run over by the driver following. -- To people who know nothing, anything is possible. To people who know too much, it is a sad fact that they know how little is really possible - and how hard it is to achieve it. |
#88
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Apprentices must really like bollockings
hugh wrote
Rod Speed wrote hugh wrote Rod Speed wrote hugh wrote Rod Speed wrote hugh wrote dennis@home wrote Jethro wrote My brother started off once, while I was still putting my seatbelt on. He'd got to about 10mph, and had to really slam the anchors on for some reason. Because I was looking down, and unprepared I went straight into the screen, and had a wonderful duck egg for weeks. I was amazed at how much force was involved. If it had happened at 30, I'm sure I would have gone through the screen. Just think what would happen if the air bag went off, you would be dead now. Air bags make it safer *if* you are seated correctly and kill you if you are leaning down. Air bags were first tried out as an alternative to seat belts - and were abandoned as dangerous to the point of being lethal. However later it was realised that they did work well in conjunction with seat belts. So the worst thing you can do is ride in a car with airbags without wearing the seat belt. You're a statistic waiting to happen. Not really. Modern air bags do work a lot better than nothing most of the time even if you dont wear a seatbelt. Either way you're probably dead in a shunt of any significance. Nope, they are pretty good at reducing the death rate. Not when used on their own. Yep, even then. That is why they were abandoned in the late 60s. Nope, they werent abandoned at all, they are there in all new cars, and still reduce the death rate even when the individual isnt wearing a seat belt. Nope they were abandoned, Nope, they never were. seat belts were mad compulsary In plenty of places they werent. and much much later air bags were reintroduced as they were very effective when used in conjunction with a seat belt And they were made compulsory in many jurisdications with new cars, even when seat belts were not compulsory, and they still reduce the death rate even when the individual isnt wearing a seat belt. I know cos I was there So was I, for even longer than you were, most likely. End Of. Fraid not. |
#89
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Apprentices must really like bollockings
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:48:40 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Mini 70mph head on into a concrete wall with just two rows of tyres in between. I thought the driver was dead, but after a couple of seconds he smashed the door open, got out and hit the car in frustration - and walked away..just as the marshals arrived. Yep, I've hit a small tree (6" max trunk dia) not very fast maybe 20 to 30mph I felt the engine thump against the bulkhead. Worst bit was scrabbling on the floor looking for my glasses that had carried on as the belt held me. I've also rolled from 50 to 60 mph after a glancing blow to a drystone wall, worst bit(*) forgetting that when hanging upside down that you *will* land on your head, in broken glass, when you release the seatbelt. I don't think many people realise how much even a low speed impact *will* hurt. There ought to more of the ramps with a rolling seat attached. You sit in the seat and roll down the ramp to sudden stop, hitting it at just a few mph, gives most people quite a shock. Or make it part of the driving test. (*) Well after the thought "Oh no this is going to hurt" as I felt the rotation start. -- Cheers Dave. |
#90
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Apprentices must really like bollockings
The Natural Philosopher wrote
dennis@home wrote hugh ] wrote Nope they were abandoned, seat belts were mad compulsary and much much later air bags were reintroduced as they were very effective when used in conjunction with a seat belt I know cos I was there End Of. You don't need seat belts for airbags to work. Look at side impact bags, the seat belt does sod all but the air bag still helps you to survive. What seat belts do is keep you out of the danger area when the bag goes off. Of course cost was a big reason why they weren't popular in the '60s. They were expensive and they didn't have microcontrollers to make them reliable. Indeed. airbags are a lessgood alternative to properly designed cars and proper seat belts, which is why no racing teams use them at all - its been shwon that proper side impacts test front impact tests, crumple zones and a full racing harness and a roll cage is how you get the BEST chance of survival. In fact adding air bags to that gives you even BETTER chance of survival. Nevertheless they are better than nothing if someone smacks into something with a sloppily tightened lap and diagonal, or no belts at all. And much better than just those things you listed alone in those circumstances. It took me just one crash right in front of my eyes at a club motor race to decide that on balance, I would never ever drive without a seat belt again. Mini 70mph head on into a concrete wall with just two rows of tyres in between. I thought the driver was dead, but after a couple of seconds he smashed the door open, got out and hit the car in frustration - and walked away..just as the marshals arrived. OTOH I saw someone killed in front of me when he was thrown out of a vintage racing car with no belts at all - and run over by the driver following. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Carpentry Math for Second-Level Apprentices | Woodworking |