"Andy Hall" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 5 May 2006 17:56:40 +0100, "Doctor Drivel"
wrote:


"Tim S" wrote in message
...


That leaves John free to eat all the
pies and pursue his other "hobbies".

If he wants to eat all the pies and shag that is his business and his
alone.

Fine, provided that he does it on his own time and his own premises
and not the ones that I am paying for.

Any proof of this besides the scribble of a shagging hussy who got £250,000
for saying she shagged Johnny?

This is s non-story and she got all this lolly because of silly people
sucking it all in.

"David Hansen" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 05 May 2006 21:24:29 +0100 someone who may be Andy Hall
wrote this:-

If he wants to eat all the pies and shag that is his business and his
alone.

Fine, provided that he does it on his own time and his own premises
and not the ones that I am paying for.

Indeed. My attention has been drawn to "the Sun" today and for once
I agree entirely with them, "Now we're ALL being screwed".

You read the SUN? Gosh! That says a lot.

"Tim S" wrote in message
.. .
Doctor Drivel wrote:


"Tim S" wrote in message
.. .


That leaves John free to eat all the
pies and pursue his other "hobbies".

If he wants to eat all the pies and shag that is his business and his
alone.

Go to him Drivel, go to him now, he needs your warm embrace more than
ever.
If you search deep, deep within him, you may find...

I'm not into shagging men, fat or not.

"Tim S" wrote in message
.. .

Jammy *******... Right, I'm phoning the Labour Party - I'll ask if they've
got any opening for useless fat slobs at 600k, I can act!

You would fit the bill of a fat slob then.

In message ews.net,
Doctor Drivel writes

"Tim S" wrote in message
. ..
Doctor Drivel wrote:


"Tim S" wrote in message
.. .


That leaves John free to eat all the
pies and pursue his other "hobbies".

If he wants to eat all the pies and shag that is his business and his
alone.

Go to him Drivel, go to him now, he needs your warm embrace more than
ever.
If you search deep, deep within him, you may find...

I'm not into shagging men, fat or not.

And no woman would shag you

.... which is why you have to DIY


--
geoff

On Sat, 6 May 2006 14:50:53 +0100, "Doctor Drivel"
wrote:


"Andy Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 5 May 2006 17:56:40 +0100, "Doctor Drivel"
wrote:


"Tim S" wrote in message
k...


That leaves John free to eat all the
pies and pursue his other "hobbies".

If he wants to eat all the pies and shag that is his business and his
alone.

Fine, provided that he does it on his own time and his own premises
and not the ones that I am paying for.

Any proof of this besides the scribble of a shagging hussy who got £250,000
for saying she shagged Johnny?

It was merely a comment that government ministers should not abuse
their position.

I didn't offer an opinion one way or the other as to whether J++
actually did that.

Clearly his boss believed that there was an issue....



This is s non-story and she got all this lolly because of silly people
sucking it all in.

So to speak.....


--

..andy

Andy Hall wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2006 17:56:40 +0100, "Doctor Drivel"
wrote:

If he wants to eat all the pies and shag that is his business and his alone.

Fine, provided that he does it on his own time and his own premises
and not the ones that I am paying for.

Apparently the police have been asked to look into the matter of the
misuse of his office. And if they bring a successful prosecution the
bag shouldn't be allowed to keep her illegally gotten gains for talking
about it in pubic:
http://channels.aolsvc.co.uk/news/ar...06173609990011
(He's got a face like a pork pie in that link.)

On 6 May 2006 23:24:25 -0700, "Weatherlawyer"
wrote:


Andy Hall wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2006 17:56:40 +0100, "Doctor Drivel"
wrote:

If he wants to eat all the pies and shag that is his business and his alone.

Fine, provided that he does it on his own time and his own premises
and not the ones that I am paying for.

Apparently the police have been asked to look into the matter of the
misuse of his office. And if they bring a successful prosecution the
bag shouldn't be allowed to keep her illegally gotten gains for talking
about it in pubic:
http://channels.aolsvc.co.uk/news/ar...06173609990011
(He's got a face like a pork pie in that link.)


Don't you mean his?


--

..andy

In article ews.net,
Doctor Drivel writes


"David Hansen" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 05 May 2006 21:24:29 +0100 someone who may be Andy Hall
wrote this:-

If he wants to eat all the pies and shag that is his business and his
alone.

Fine, provided that he does it on his own time and his own premises
and not the ones that I am paying for.

Indeed. My attention has been drawn to "the Sun" today and for once
I agree entirely with them, "Now we're ALL being screwed".

You read the SUN? Gosh! That says a lot.

Yes, it says a lot about *your* prejudices.
--
Mr X

In article , Martin
writes

And as Prescott was shagging the civil servant, the tits-ups and cock-ups
were literal, metaphorical and, now, hardly surprising. And the fat
******* gets to keep his salary........

Good compensation for a 2" penis...
--
Mr X

In article ews.net,
Doctor Drivel writes


"Tim S" wrote in message
. ..


That leaves John free to eat all the
pies and pursue his other "hobbies".

If he wants to eat all the pies and shag that is his business and his alone.

But the problem is he wants to do with public money and in public time.
--
Mr X

In an earlier contribution to this discussion,
raden wrote:

In message ews.net,
Doctor Drivel writes


I'm not into shagging men, fat or not.

And no woman would shag you

... which is why you have to DIY


Didn't we always know he was a w*nker?! g
--
Cheers,
Roger
______
Email address maintained for newsgroup use only, and not regularly
monitored.. Messages sent to it may not be read for several weeks.
PLEASE REPLY TO NEWSGROUP!

In article om,
Weatherlawyer wrote:
Apparently the police have been asked to look into the matter of the
misuse of his office. And if they bring a successful prosecution the
bag shouldn't be allowed to keep her illegally gotten gains for talking
about it in pubic:

That would set quite a precedent. Stopping partners of 'criminals' talking
to the press would leave some newspapers empty...

--
*It ain't the size, it's... er... no, it IS ..the size.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

On Sun, 7 May 2006 06:24:25 UTC, "Weatherlawyer"
wrote:

bag shouldn't be allowed to keep her illegally gotten gains for talking
about it in pubic:

Freudian slip?

--
The information contained in this post is copyright the
poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by
Avenue Supplies, http://avenuesupplies.co.uk

Andy Hall wrote:

http://channels.aolsvc.co.uk/news/ar...06173609990011
(He's got a face like a pork pie in that link.)

Don't you mean his?

Eh?

Do you have any idea what you are talking about, or am I supposed to
second guess which pie ce of text you are replying to?

(There are a lot of morons on this board. One wonders how many of them
voted for a pork pie and a cream cracker.)

On Sun, 7 May 2006 13:15:11 UTC, "Weatherlawyer"
wrote:

(There are a lot of morons on this board. One wonders how many of them
voted for a pork pie and a cream cracker.)

Board? Board????! This is bloody Usenet, chum.

--
The information contained in this post is copyright the
poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by
Avenue Supplies, http://avenuesupplies.co.uk

On 7 May 2006 06:15:11 -0700, "Weatherlawyer"
wrote:


Andy Hall wrote:

http://channels.aolsvc.co.uk/news/ar...06173609990011
(He's got a face like a pork pie in that link.)

Don't you mean his?

Eh?

Do you have any idea what you are talking about, or am I supposed to
second guess which pie ce of text you are replying to?

It's pretty obvious that the reference is to

"keep her illegally gotten gains"


(There are a lot of morons on this board.

It's Usenet, not a "board".




--

..andy

In message , Bob Eager
writes
On Sun, 7 May 2006 13:15:11 UTC, "Weatherlawyer"
wrote:

(There are a lot of morons on this board. One wonders how many of them
voted for a pork pie and a cream cracker.)

Board? Board????! This is bloody Usenet, chum.

Come on now, he didn't claim not to be one of the morons, did he ?

--
geoff

On Sun, 7 May 2006 14:57:44 UTC, raden wrote:

In message , Bob Eager
writes
On Sun, 7 May 2006 13:15:11 UTC, "Weatherlawyer"
wrote:

(There are a lot of morons on this board. One wonders how many of them
voted for a pork pie and a cream cracker.)

Board? Board????! This is bloody Usenet, chum.

Come on now, he didn't claim not to be one of the morons, did he ?

True...!

--
The information contained in this post is copyright the
poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by
Avenue Supplies, http://avenuesupplies.co.uk

Doctor Drivel wrote:

Back from the plumbworld trip to ibeeza I see... how many magnacleans
did you need to shift for that?

He hasn't. He just had a shag.

On employers time, in their offices, shortly after lecturing others on
"moral standards" and tory "sleaze".... So all in all a straight up kind
of guy! (at least by the standards set by the rest of the shower phoney
calls a government).

I hear the latest ruse is he wants to take legal action against the
press because when they went public with that story, it let the cat out
of the bag and his wife also found out about all the other times he was
a cheating *******.

--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/

On Sat, 6 May 2006 14:51:28 +0100 someone who may be "Doctor Drivel"
wrote this:-

Indeed. My attention has been drawn to "the Sun" today and for once
I agree entirely with them, "Now we're ALL being screwed".

You read the SUN? Gosh! That says a lot.

Nice try, but as is often the case a "clever" remark just tends to
leave the author looking foolish.

My attention was drawn to "the Sun" by a review of newspapers on
Radio 4. I then looked up the article on the web.


--
David Hansen, Edinburgh
I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54

Doctor Drivel wrote:


"David Hansen" wrote in message
...

On Fri, 05 May 2006 21:24:29 +0100 someone who may be Andy Hall
wrote this:-

If he wants to eat all the pies and shag that is his business and
his alone.


Fine, provided that he does it on his own time and his own premises
and not the ones that I am paying for.


Indeed. My attention has been drawn to "the Sun" today and for once
I agree entirely with them, "Now we're ALL being screwed".


You read the SUN? Gosh! That says a lot.

I would imagine that it would be outside your talents to look at the
pictures in the Daily Star :-)

Dave

In article , John
Rumm writes

Doctor Drivel wrote:

Back from the plumbworld trip to ibeeza I see... how many magnacleans
did you need to shift for that?

He hasn't. He just had a shag.

On employers time, in their offices

Behaviour that would get an ordinary person instant dismissal for "Gross
Misconduct".
--
Mr X

Andy Hall wrote:
On 7 May 2006 06:15:11 -0700, "Weatherlawyer"
wrote:
Andy Hall wrote:

http://channels.aolsvc.co.uk/news/ar...06173609990011
(He's got a face like a pork pie in that link.)

Don't you mean his?

Eh?

Do you have any idea what you are talking about, or am I supposed to
second guess which pie ce of text you are replying to?

It's pretty obvious that the reference is to

"keep her illegally gotten gains"

(There are a lot of morons on this board.

It's Usenet, not a "board".

It's pretty obvious that my comment highlighted his ignorance as well
as the ignorance of the trailers after him, by the fact I used the
original term for Usent boards once they had been categorised as
Bulletin Boards -analogous to the notice boads that kept scientific
researchers up to date with their fellows at colleges on the pin boards
there and hence by common interoperability: all over the world.

It was on these boards that research students and their mentors posed
questions to problems that had them stumped. And from them too, hoi
polloi of the college were introduced to the environment of their
envelope.

TWIMC:
I suggest you spend a LOT more time doing something useful instead of
trolling your turds on here.

As for my original post, the depth of your ignorance is more strongly
sounded by the fact that so few of you followers know that the crime of
profiting from publication of the affairs of the adulterer and his bag,
was committed by the bag.

Consider yourselves thoroughly admonished and that for future
reference, I will have forgotten who you are.

Bob Eager wrote:

Freudian slip?

Eager, from the term eag The interior diameter of a hole, tube, or
cylinder.

Eager by name, tart by nature. I shall be watching you, dullard.

Take care, you anus.

In message . com,
Weatherlawyer writes

Andy Hall wrote:
On 7 May 2006 06:15:11 -0700, "Weatherlawyer"
wrote:
Andy Hall wrote:

http://channels.aolsvc.co.uk/news/ar...06173609990011
(He's got a face like a pork pie in that link.)

Don't you mean his?

Eh?

Do you have any idea what you are talking about, or am I supposed to
second guess which pie ce of text you are replying to?

It's pretty obvious that the reference is to

"keep her illegally gotten gains"

(There are a lot of morons on this board.

It's Usenet, not a "board".

It's pretty obvious that my comment highlighted his ignorance as well
as the ignorance of the trailers after him, by the fact I used the
original term for Usent boards once they had been categorised as
Bulletin Boards -analogous to the notice boads that kept scientific
researchers up to date with their fellows at colleges on the pin boards
there and hence by common interoperability: all over the world.

It was on these boards that research students and their mentors posed
questions to problems that had them stumped. And from them too, hoi
polloi of the college were introduced to the environment of their
envelope.

TWIMC:
I suggest you spend a LOT more time doing something useful instead of
trolling your turds on here.

As for my original post, the depth of your ignorance is more strongly
sounded by the fact that so few of you followers know that the crime of
profiting from publication of the affairs of the adulterer and his bag,
was committed by the bag.

Consider yourselves thoroughly admonished and that for future
reference, I will have forgotten who you are.

Oh do **** off

technology has obviously moved on and left you behind

you pretentious ****

--
geoff

On Sun, 7 May 2006 18:47:59 UTC, "Weatherlawyer"
wrote:

It's pretty obvious that my comment highlighted his ignorance as well
as the ignorance of the trailers after him, by the fact I used the
original term for Usent boards

No, the original term for Usenet was 'newsgroups' and then 'Usenet'.

--
The information contained in this post is copyright the
poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by
Avenue Supplies, http://avenuesupplies.co.uk

In message , Edward W.
Thompson writes

He seems to have come out of it reasonably well, other than a bruised
ego. He loses his administrative responsibilities but gets to keep
his salary as DPM. What exactly does he do to 'justify' his inflated
salary seeing he is just about as worthless as can be?


Perhaps he has his own "little black book" full of scandalous secrets
that T. Bliar doesn't want revealed..........


--
Keith

On Sun, 7 May 2006 18:56:28 UTC, "Weatherlawyer"
wrote:


Bob Eager wrote:

Freudian slip?

Take care, you anus.

To echo geoff:

Oh do **** off

you pretentious ****


--
The information contained in this post is copyright the
poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by
Avenue Supplies, http://avenuesupplies.co.uk

On Sun, 07 May 2006 19:28:53 GMT, Keith
wrote:

In message , Edward W.
Thompson writes

He seems to have come out of it reasonably well, other than a bruised
ego. He loses his administrative responsibilities but gets to keep
his salary as DPM. What exactly does he do to 'justify' his inflated
salary seeing he is just about as worthless as can be?


Perhaps he has his own "little black book" full of scandalous secrets
that T. Bliar doesn't want revealed..........

Count on it...


--

..andy

raden wrote:

Consider yourselves thoroughly admonished and that for future
reference, I will have forgotten who you are.

Oh do **** off

technology has obviously moved on and left you behind

you pretentious ****

You took the words right out of my mouth! ;-)

--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/

Weatherlawyer wrote:
(There are a lot of morons on this board.

What "board"?

The message .com
from "Weatherlawyer" contains a load of crap

plonk

You can now have the pleasure of the company of dribble and bacon in my
killfile. You go well together.

--
Roger Chapman

On Sun, 7 May 2006 19:50:10 UTC, Andy Hall wrote:

Perhaps he has his own "little black book" full of scandalous secrets
that T. Bliar doesn't want revealed..........

Count on it...

I thought that Prezza's little black book had a rather different list in
it...one of the more recent being 'Tracy'....

--
The information contained in this post is copyright the
poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by
Avenue Supplies, http://avenuesupplies.co.uk

Weatherlawyer wrote:
Bob Eager wrote:
Freudian slip?

Eager, from the term eag The interior diameter of a hole, tube, or
cylinder.

Eager by name, tart by nature. I shall be watching you, dullard.

Take care, you anus.

Gosh, you'll be "kill-filed" and then moaned on and on and on and
on and on and on about!

On Sun, 7 May 2006 21:05:39 UTC, Roger
wrote:

The message .com
from "Weatherlawyer" contains a load of crap

plonk

You can now have the pleasure of the company of dribble and bacon in my
killfile. You go well together.

You're right...it's time.

--
The information contained in this post is copyright the
poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by
Avenue Supplies, http://avenuesupplies.co.uk

In message , Bob Eager
writes
On Sun, 7 May 2006 21:05:39 UTC, Roger
wrote:

The message .com
from "Weatherlawyer" contains a load of crap

plonk

You can now have the pleasure of the company of dribble and bacon in my
killfile. You go well together.

You're right...it's time.

What, breakfast?

"Dribble and Bacon, sunny side up "

--
geoff

Bob Eager wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2006 21:05:39 UTC, Roger
wrote:

The message from "Weatherlawyer" contains

plonk

You can now have the pleasure of the company of dribble and bacon in my
killfile. You go well together.

You're right...it's time.

Yawn... Nothing if not predictable....

In message , Chris Bacon
writes
Weatherlawyer wrote:
Bob Eager wrote:
Freudian slip?

Eager, from the term eag The interior diameter of a hole, tube, or
cylinder.
Eager by name, tart by nature. I shall be watching you, dullard.
Take care, you anus.

Gosh, you'll be "kill-filed" and then moaned on and on and on and
on and on and on about!

Yes but just think about it

You can witter on and on and nobody will argue with you

you're in your element


--
geoff

raden wrote:
What, breakfast? "Dribble and Bacon, sunny side up "

Oi, not on the same plate, puh-lease!