UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Andy Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default student TV problem in London (oh yes)

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:46:55 GMT, dave wrote:

My daughter has a room in a student house in London that's surrounded by
concrete buildings - now there's surprise :-) She has a TV that only picks up
channel 5. There's no cable/aerial etc in the place apart from the one that came
with the TV and no amount of twiddling get a picture. Can someone recommend an
(inexpensive) aerial preamp that will boost the signal?
Thanks



It's a bit surprising that there is something from Channel 5 and not
the other channels, since this has a much lower signal level from the
transmitters.

Are you sure that she has tried tuning the set?

A Yagi type set top antenna (small version of an outside type
antenna), may give better results, especially if located upstairs, but
generally adding an antenna pre-amplifier won't do very much if there
is little signal in the first place, or if it has ghosting resulting
from the surrounding buildings.

You could always tell her that she should be getting on with studies,
but I don't suppose that that would be met with any better reception
than she's getting already.


--

..andy

To email, substitute .nospam with .gl
  #2   Report Post  
Bob Eager
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:46:55 UTC, dave wrote:

My daughter has a room in a student house in London that's surrounded by
concrete buildings - now there's surprise :-) She has a TV that only picks up
channel 5. There's no cable/aerial etc in the place apart from the one that came
with the TV and no amount of twiddling get a picture. Can someone recommend an
(inexpensive) aerial preamp that will boost the signal?


And of course check she has a licence...they are very hot on student
houses...

--
The information contained in this post is copyright the
poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by
http://laminateflooring.oncloud8.com
  #3   Report Post  
Andrew Mawson
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"dave" wrote in message
...
My daughter has a room in a student house in London that's

surrounded by
concrete buildings - now there's surprise :-) She has a TV that only

picks up
channel 5. There's no cable/aerial etc in the place apart from the

one that came
with the TV and no amount of twiddling get a picture. Can someone

recommend an
(inexpensive) aerial preamp that will boost the signal?
Thanks



....mmmm ... if this TV has been moved from home to her digs then it's
probably come from an area where the channels are significantly
different tuning. MOST of London has quite good reception and is in
line of sight of the transmitters. I'd investigate tuning first. She
presumably only needs BBC2 anyway for the open university G

AWEM




  #4   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So let me get this straight. You pay =A3120 for a TV license and you get
nothing for it. Come on now, that sort of thing only happens in the UK.

I did buy one of those 42 element aerials from B & Q, Maplins also do
them for about =A325. However I did have a loft to put it in.

What about a TV card for her computer. They have quite sensative front
ends in the receiver. Then you can record to hard disc.

Chris.

  #5   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So let me get this straight. You pay =A3120 for a TV license and you get
nothing for it. Come on now, that sort of thing only happens in the UK.

I did buy one of those 42 element aerials from B & Q, Maplins also do
them for about =A325. However I did have a loft to put it in.

What about a TV card for her computer. They have quite sensative front
ends in the receiver. Then you can record to hard disc.

Chris.



  #6   Report Post  
Richard Conway
 
Posts: n/a
Default

dave wrote:
My daughter has a room in a student house in London that's surrounded by
concrete buildings - now there's surprise :-) She has a TV that only picks up
channel 5. There's no cable/aerial etc in the place apart from the one that came
with the TV and no amount of twiddling get a picture. Can someone recommend an
(inexpensive) aerial preamp that will boost the signal?
Thanks


Surely she can just watch the big screen in the students union bar or
whatever pub she happens to be in at the time!
  #7   Report Post  
John Cartmell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com,
wrote:
So let me get this straight. You pay £120 for a TV license and you get
nothing for it. Come on now, that sort of thing only happens in the UK.


Compare UK TV with USA TV. The quality we get (across all channels) is driven
by the licence we pay. Cut out the licence and all you do is put (more) money
in the back pocket of Murdoch and dump the quality of TV for all of us - and
at far greater cost.

--
John Cartmell john@ followed by finnybank.com 0845 006 8822
Qercus magazine FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527 www.finnybank.com
Qercus - the best guide to RISC OS computing

  #8   Report Post  
John Cartmell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , John Cartmell
wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:
So let me get this straight. You pay £120 for a TV license and you get
nothing for it. Come on now, that sort of thing only happens in the UK.


Compare UK TV with USA TV. The quality we get (across all channels) is
driven by the licence we pay. Cut out the licence and all you do is put
(more) money in the back pocket of Murdoch and dump the quality of TV for
all of us - and at far greater cost.



And in case anyone is misled by your other comment - a TV card in a PC
requires a licence.

--
John Cartmell john@ followed by finnybank.com 0845 006 8822
Qercus magazine FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527 www.finnybank.com
Qercus - the best guide to RISC OS computing

  #9   Report Post  
Andy Luckman (AJL Electronics)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com,
wrote:

So let me get this straight.


http://www.allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?How_to_post


--
AJL
  #12   Report Post  
Ericp
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:43:59 +0100, Rob Morley
wrote:

In article ,
says...
In article , John Cartmell
wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:
So let me get this straight. You pay £120 for a TV license and you get
nothing for it. Come on now, that sort of thing only happens in the UK.


Compare UK TV with USA TV. The quality we get (across all channels) is
driven by the licence we pay. Cut out the licence and all you do is put
(more) money in the back pocket of Murdoch and dump the quality of TV for
all of us - and at far greater cost.



And in case anyone is misled by your other comment - a TV card in a PC
requires a licence.


Would a USB TV card running on a laptop on battery power be a special
case? I can't remember what difference it makes, but I remember there's
something about battery poweed TVs.


If you are the holder of a valid tv license then you are entitled to
use a portable tv away from home, if it is powered by it's own
internal batteries. That what you are thinking of?

As usual, it is completely outstripped by advancing technology. I am
getting a Freecom Freeview dongle for the pc. It will probably be
legal away from home but depends which of my family are operating it.

  #13   Report Post  
Sam Nelson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Richard Conway writes:
Rob Morley wrote:
Would a USB TV card running on a laptop on battery power be a special
case? I can't remember what difference it makes, but I remember there's
something about battery poweed TVs.


I'm pretty sure the pocket 4" TVs are exempt. I suppose it would be
pretty sketchy on the laptop - what if you were using it in the park?


Battery-powered TVs do not need a licence. Years back, I knew someone whose
sole TV was a 12" B/W portable next to which sat the car battery that powered
it. Of course, he'd then charge the car battery from the mains...
--
SAm.
  #15   Report Post  
John Cartmell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Sam Nelson
wrote:
In article , Richard Conway
writes:
Rob Morley wrote:
Would a USB TV card running on a laptop on battery power be a special
case? I can't remember what difference it makes, but I remember
there's something about battery poweed TVs.


I'm pretty sure the pocket 4" TVs are exempt. I suppose it would be
pretty sketchy on the laptop - what if you were using it in the park?


Battery-powered TVs do not need a licence.


Cite?

Years back, I knew someone whose sole TV was a 12" B/W portable next to
which sat the car battery that powered it. Of course, he'd then charge the
car battery from the mains...


Sounds urban & mythical.

--
John Cartmell john@ followed by finnybank.com 0845 006 8822
Qercus magazine FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527 www.finnybank.com
Qercus - the best guide to RISC OS computing



  #16   Report Post  
Andrew Gabriel
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Rob Morley writes:
Would a USB TV card running on a laptop on battery power be a special=20
case? I can't remember what difference it makes, but I remember there's=20
something about battery poweed TVs.


Here's my interpretation of the addtional permitted use cases:

o TV's powered only by internal batteries can be used by the licence
holder away from home (but not by other members of the household).

o TV's in boats/caravans used for touring.

o TV's in caravans not used for touring (and includes use by visitors
in the presence of the licence holder) providing no television is
being used in the licenced premises at the same time.

Way back when I was in a Hall of Residence, I wrote to the licensing
authority asking what the rules were for such a place. The reply was
that a licence was needed for each "family unit" which had a TV, and
a "family unit" was defined as a group of people who usually eat at
least one meal a day together (would exclude many families nowadays;-).
So in a self-catering hall, each person ended up needing their own
licence, whereas in a catered hall, only a single licence was required.
This was 25 years ago, and the rules may well be different now, or
interpreted differently even if they haven't changed. There weren't
many personal TV's in Halls of Residence back then, anyway. There
were however plenty of students who ended up being prosecuted for
not having licences in student houses/digs.

However, you have to satisfy yourself of the rules. I'm not paying
your fine just because you believe anything I say...

--
Andrew Gabriel
  #17   Report Post  
s--p--o--n--i--x
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:31:54 +0100, John Cartmell
wrote:

Compare UK TV with USA TV. The quality we get (across all channels) is driven
by the licence we pay. Cut out the licence and all you do is put (more) money
in the back pocket of Murdoch and dump the quality of TV for all of us - and
at far greater cost.


How do you figure that one out?

You could argue that by dumping the licence fee the BBC will need to
make programmes that people actually want to watch in order to keep
advertisers happy, rather than the arty-farty stuff that is watched by
a couple of thousand people.

sponix
  #18   Report Post  
Bob Mannix
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Andrew Gabriel" wrote in message
.. .
In article ,
Rob Morley writes:
Would a USB TV card running on a laptop on battery power be a special=20
case? I can't remember what difference it makes, but I remember
there's=20
something about battery poweed TVs.


snip

However, you have to satisfy yourself of the rules. I'm not paying
your fine just because you believe anything I say...


http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/information/students.jsp

strangely enough!


--
Bob Mannix
(anti-spam is as easy as 1-2-3 - not)


  #19   Report Post  
Richard Conway
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Owain wrote:
Rob Morley wrote:

Would a USB TV card running on a laptop on battery power be a special
case? I can't remember what difference it makes, but I remember
there's something about battery poweed TVs.



It's the USB tv adapter which would be the licensable apparatus, not the
PC, and the laptop battery is not internal to the TV adapter, so it
would not be covered by the internal battery exemption.

Owain


So does that mean that if I get a 42" plasma screen and plug it in to a
tuner that runs off internal batteries I can happily watch without a
license?
  #21   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Sam Nelson wrote:
In article ,
Richard Conway writes:
Rob Morley wrote:
Would a USB TV card running on a laptop on battery power be a special
case? I can't remember what difference it makes, but I remember there's
something about battery poweed TVs.


I'm pretty sure the pocket 4" TVs are exempt. I suppose it would be
pretty sketchy on the laptop - what if you were using it in the park?


Battery-powered TVs do not need a licence. Years back, I knew someone whose
sole TV was a 12" B/W portable next to which sat the car battery that powered
it. Of course, he'd then charge the car battery from the mains...


Wrong! They can be used away from home if you already have a license
for a TV at home. I used to believe a student could use a battery
powered TV if their parents had a license but even that doesn't seem to
be true anymore.

ISTR this subject was done to death here a few months ago and is all on
the TV licensing website, somewhere.

MBQ

  #23   Report Post  
Dave Plowman (News)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
s--p--o--n--i--x wrote:
You could argue that by dumping the licence fee the BBC will need to
make programmes that people actually want to watch in order to keep
advertisers happy, rather than the arty-farty stuff that is watched by
a couple of thousand people.


There's only a limited amount of advertising money in the pot, and not
enough to finance the BBC as we know it.

--
*Where do forest rangers go to "get away from it all?"

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #24   Report Post  
Dave Plowman (News)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com,
wrote:
Battery-powered TVs do not need a licence. Years back, I knew someone
whose sole TV was a 12" B/W portable next to which sat the car battery
that powered it. Of course, he'd then charge the car battery from the
mains...


Wrong! They can be used away from home if you already have a license for
a TV at home. I used to believe a student could use a battery powered TV
if their parents had a license but even that doesn't seem to be true
anymore.


I'd think not. A child may be able to at say scout camp.

--
*Hard work has a future payoff. Laziness pays off NOW.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
  #26   Report Post  
Bob Eager
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:46:04 UTC, Richard Conway wrote:

And in case anyone is misled by your other comment - a TV card in a PC
requires a licence.


Would a USB TV card running on a laptop on battery power be a special
case? I can't remember what difference it makes, but I remember there's
something about battery poweed TVs.


I'm pretty sure the pocket 4" TVs are exempt. I suppose it would be
pretty sketchy on the laptop - what if you were using it in the park?


You need a licence unless:

a) You are living 'away from home' and your parents have a licence AND
b) The TV is wholly powered by self contained batteries wholly contained
within it.

(I've written guidance notes for students in a hall of residence...!)
--
The information contained in this post is copyright the
poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by
http://laminateflooring.oncloud8.com

  #28   Report Post  
Richard Conway
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Owain wrote:
Richard Conway wrote:

It's the USB tv adapter which would be the licensable apparatus, not
the PC, and the laptop battery is not internal to the TV adapter, so
it would not be covered by the internal battery exemption.


So does that mean that if I get a 42" plasma screen and plug it in to
a tuner that runs off internal batteries I can happily watch without a
license?



Yes, if you're confident you can sound more convincing in court than
TVL's barrister :-)

Owain

I'll start putting my case together...
  #29   Report Post  
Andrew Gabriel
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Bob Eager" writes:
Quote from the TV Licensing website:

Q. "Aren't I covered by my parents' licence while I'm away?"

A. "No. Unless your TV is powered by internal batteries, such as a
pocket-sized TV."


That disagrees with what it says on the back of my licence,
which is that this applies to the specified licence holder
only (unlikely to be the student).

--
Andrew Gabriel
  #30   Report Post  
Dave Jones
 
Posts: n/a
Default



--
www.davidarthur.ws
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
s--p--o--n--i--x wrote:
You could argue that by dumping the licence fee the BBC will need to
make programmes that people actually want to watch in order to keep
advertisers happy, rather than the arty-farty stuff that is watched by
a couple of thousand people.


There's only a limited amount of advertising money in the pot, and not
enough to finance the BBC as we know it.

So how come there seems to be more and more channels all the time, on
freeview and sky. Seems to be enough money to go round there.

And also why should only the UK have to pay towards the BBC when it's
broadcast FTA across Europe.

The only reason they pick on students is that they are easy targets, I'm
still waiting for them to come round to check that I haven't got a TV, been
4 years now! No rush then!

About time we had a fairer system, why should a single person pay £120, and
a house of 4 adults (with 6 TV's)pay the same, don't make any sense to me.




  #31   Report Post  
:::Jerry::::
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"s--p--o--n--i--x" wrote in message
...
snip

You could argue that by dumping the licence fee the BBC will need

to
make programmes that people actually want to watch in order to keep
advertisers happy, rather than the arty-farty stuff that is watched

by
a couple of thousand people.


Well considering that the BBC won the BBC1 vs. ITV1 rating war for
the first half on this year it would suggest that people are sick to
the back teeth of the stuff ITV has been churning out (not
withstanding a few notable exceptions)...


  #33   Report Post  
:::Jerry::::
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dave Jones" wrote in message
...
www.davidarthur.ws
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
s--p--o--n--i--x wrote:
You could argue that by dumping the licence fee the BBC will

need to
make programmes that people actually want to watch in order to

keep
advertisers happy, rather than the arty-farty stuff that is

watched by
a couple of thousand people.


There's only a limited amount of advertising money in the pot,

and not
enough to finance the BBC as we know it.

So how come there seems to be more and more channels all the time,

on
freeview and sky. Seems to be enough money to go round there.


Cheap rates and or specialist advertising, together with mostly non
original programmes (either repeats or bought in) I suspect.


And also why should only the UK have to pay towards the BBC when

it's
broadcast FTA across Europe.


Next you will be objecting to the BBC World Service, people don't
even have a say in paying for that, even non TV owners pay!


The only reason they pick on students is that they are easy

targets, I'm
still waiting for them to come round to check that I haven't got a

TV, been
4 years now! No rush then!

About time we had a fairer system, why should a single person pay

£120, and
a house of 4 adults (with 6 TV's)pay the same, don't make any sense

to me.


Life is unfair at time, isn't it.....FFS grow up!


  #34   Report Post  
Pet @ www.gymratz.co.uk ;¬)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bob Eager wrote:

a) You are living 'away from home' and your parents have a licence AND
b) The TV is wholly powered by self contained batteries wholly contained
within it.


So a nice widescreen laptop with tv card then.

:¬)

--
http://gymratz.co.uk - Best Gym Equipment & Bodybuilding Supplements UK.
http://trade-price-supplements.co.uk - TRADE PRICED SUPPLEMENTS for ALL!
http://fitness-equipment-uk.com - UK's No.1 Fitness Equipment Suppliers.
http://gymratz.co.uk/hot-seat.htm - Live web-cam! (sometimes)
  #35   Report Post  
Dave Jones
 
Posts: n/a
Default



--
www.davidarthur.ws
":::Jerry::::" wrote in message
eenews.net...

"Dave Jones" wrote in message
...
www.davidarthur.ws
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
s--p--o--n--i--x wrote:
You could argue that by dumping the licence fee the BBC will

need to
make programmes that people actually want to watch in order to

keep
advertisers happy, rather than the arty-farty stuff that is

watched by
a couple of thousand people.

There's only a limited amount of advertising money in the pot,

and not
enough to finance the BBC as we know it.

So how come there seems to be more and more channels all the time,

on
freeview and sky. Seems to be enough money to go round there.


Cheap rates and or specialist advertising, together with mostly non
original programmes (either repeats or bought in) I suspect.


And also why should only the UK have to pay towards the BBC when

it's
broadcast FTA across Europe.


Next you will be objecting to the BBC World Service, people don't
even have a say in paying for that, even non TV owners pay!


The only reason they pick on students is that they are easy

targets, I'm
still waiting for them to come round to check that I haven't got a

TV, been
4 years now! No rush then!

About time we had a fairer system, why should a single person pay

£120, and
a house of 4 adults (with 6 TV's)pay the same, don't make any sense

to me.


Life is unfair at time, isn't it.....FFS grow up!

Try tell that to the 65 year old, trying to live on a state pension.




  #36   Report Post  
raden
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , Dave Jones
writes



Sorry to top post but

Would you like to get your bloody sig separator sorted out ?

The whole post has become part of your sig ...Again




--
www.davidarthur.ws
":::Jerry::::" wrote in message
eenews.net...

"Dave Jones" wrote in message
...
www.davidarthur.ws
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
s--p--o--n--i--x wrote:
You could argue that by dumping the licence fee the BBC will

need to
make programmes that people actually want to watch in order to

keep
advertisers happy, rather than the arty-farty stuff that is

watched by
a couple of thousand people.

There's only a limited amount of advertising money in the pot,

and not
enough to finance the BBC as we know it.

So how come there seems to be more and more channels all the time,

on
freeview and sky. Seems to be enough money to go round there.


Cheap rates and or specialist advertising, together with mostly non
original programmes (either repeats or bought in) I suspect.


And also why should only the UK have to pay towards the BBC when

it's
broadcast FTA across Europe.


Next you will be objecting to the BBC World Service, people don't
even have a say in paying for that, even non TV owners pay!


The only reason they pick on students is that they are easy

targets, I'm
still waiting for them to come round to check that I haven't got a

TV, been
4 years now! No rush then!

About time we had a fairer system, why should a single person pay

£120, and
a house of 4 adults (with 6 TV's)pay the same, don't make any sense

to me.


Life is unfair at time, isn't it.....FFS grow up!

Try tell that to the 65 year old, trying to live on a state pension.



--
geoff
  #37   Report Post  
Dave Jones
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"raden" wrote in message
...
In message , Dave Jones
writes



Sorry to top post but

Would you like to get your bloody sig separator sorted out ?

The whole post has become part of your sig ...Again


Yep Sorry, forgot about that


  #38   Report Post  
Richard Conway
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Andrew Gabriel wrote:
In article ,
"Bob Eager" writes:

Quote from the TV Licensing website:

Q. "Aren't I covered by my parents' licence while I'm away?"

A. "No. Unless your TV is powered by internal batteries, such as a
pocket-sized TV."



That disagrees with what it says on the back of my licence,
which is that this applies to the specified licence holder
only (unlikely to be the student).

How about deliberately transferring the license to the student for the
purpose of getting round this?
  #39   Report Post  
:::Jerry::::
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Richard Conway" wrote in message
...
Andrew Gabriel wrote:
In article ,
"Bob Eager" writes:

Quote from the TV Licensing website:

Q. "Aren't I covered by my parents' licence while I'm away?"

A. "No. Unless your TV is powered by internal batteries, such as

a
pocket-sized TV."



That disagrees with what it says on the back of my licence,
which is that this applies to the specified licence holder
only (unlikely to be the student).

How about deliberately transferring the license to the student for

the
purpose of getting round this?


Then the parents home address would not have a licence, the
address[1] *has to be* on the licence for the address were the TV is
being used.

[1] the student will be registered as living at another address for
council tax purposes etc.


  #40   Report Post  
Dave Plowman (News)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Richard Conway wrote:
That disagrees with what it says on the back of my licence,
which is that this applies to the specified licence holder
only (unlikely to be the student).

How about deliberately transferring the license to the student for the
purpose of getting round this?


Then you'd not be covered while he/she was away.

--
*A backward poet writes inverse.*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem with room getting too hot from facing the south (even in late October) jeff Home Repair 11 November 2nd 04 08:18 PM
Water Pump / Pressure Tank Problem !!!!!! James Nipper Home Ownership 6 June 28th 04 02:13 AM
Problem with new water heater (electric) - please advice Robert Home Ownership 8 February 19th 04 05:27 AM
Problem with retrace lines on EIZO F55S... [email protected] Electronics Repair 2 October 20th 03 01:29 AM
CRT Contrast Problem David Ellingsworth Electronics Repair 6 October 4th 03 06:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"