In message , Dave Jones
writes



Sorry to top post but

Would you like to get your bloody sig separator sorted out ?

The whole post has become part of your sig ...Again




--
www.davidarthur.ws
":::Jerry::::" wrote in message
eenews.net...

"Dave Jones" wrote in message
...
www.davidarthur.ws
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
s--p--o--n--i--x wrote:
You could argue that by dumping the licence fee the BBC will
need to
make programmes that people actually want to watch in order to
keep
advertisers happy, rather than the arty-farty stuff that is
watched by
a couple of thousand people.

There's only a limited amount of advertising money in the pot,
and not
enough to finance the BBC as we know it.

So how come there seems to be more and more channels all the time,
on
freeview and sky. Seems to be enough money to go round there.

Cheap rates and or specialist advertising, together with mostly non
original programmes (either repeats or bought in) I suspect.


And also why should only the UK have to pay towards the BBC when
it's
broadcast FTA across Europe.

Next you will be objecting to the BBC World Service, people don't
even have a say in paying for that, even non TV owners pay!


The only reason they pick on students is that they are easy
targets, I'm
still waiting for them to come round to check that I haven't got a
TV, been
4 years now! No rush then!

About time we had a fairer system, why should a single person pay
£120, and
a house of 4 adults (with 6 TV's)pay the same, don't make any sense
to me.


Life is unfair at time, isn't it.....FFS grow up!

Try tell that to the 65 year old, trying to live on a state pension.



--
geoff