On 3/19/2012 1:13 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 3/19/2012 12:35 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/18/2012 8:13 PM, David R. Birch wrote:
On 3/18/2012 3:19 PM, Hawwke-ptooey wrote:
On 3/17/2012 6:31 PM, wrote:
On Mar 17, 4:51 pm, wrote:


I played a lot of football back then too. I don't ever play any more.
Don't tell me I should have never played at all because I stopped
playing. So those are two things I don't do any more. I don't play
football and I don't provide citations for everyone who doesn't know
that what I have said is true. If they think it's wrong they can
try to
prove it themselves.

Hawke

As I see it you have not benefited by going to college. There is no
point in going to college if you do not use what you learned.


Dan


If all you got from college is vocational training that might be true.
But if you went to college to also become an educated man then you're
full of it. By the way, from what I can tell from you it doesn't even
seem like you have anything more than a high school education. If you
really went to college you sure can't tell it from the things you write
here.

Hawwke-ptooey

The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility, maturity
and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you
seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult
conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be able
to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and obnoxious to
even be amusing.

You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all that you
show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out your
errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid political
stances other than left/right or that there are people like me far to
the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are.

David


Your redundancy in continuing to repost the same message over and over
only serves to highlight your lack of intellect.

No, it serves as a helpful reminder of what a buffoon you are.


Only a dip**** thinks that. Which you are.

Hawke

On 3/20/2012 11:06 AM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/19/2012 1:13 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 3/19/2012 12:35 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/18/2012 8:13 PM, David R. Birch wrote:
On 3/18/2012 3:19 PM, Hawwke-ptooey wrote:
On 3/17/2012 6:31 PM, wrote:
On Mar 17, 4:51 pm, wrote:


I played a lot of football back then too. I don't ever play any
more.
Don't tell me I should have never played at all because I stopped
playing. So those are two things I don't do any more. I don't play
football and I don't provide citations for everyone who doesn't know
that what I have said is true. If they think it's wrong they can
try to
prove it themselves.

Hawke

As I see it you have not benefited by going to college. There is no
point in going to college if you do not use what you learned.


Dan


If all you got from college is vocational training that might be true.
But if you went to college to also become an educated man then you're
full of it. By the way, from what I can tell from you it doesn't even
seem like you have anything more than a high school education. If you
really went to college you sure can't tell it from the things you
write
here.

Hawwke-ptooey

The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility, maturity
and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you
seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult
conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be
able
to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and obnoxious to
even be amusing.

You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all that
you
show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out your
errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid political
stances other than left/right or that there are people like me far to
the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are.

David


Your redundancy in continuing to repost the same message over and over
only serves to highlight your lack of intellect.

No, it serves as a helpful reminder of what a buffoon you are.


Only a dip**** thinks that.

No, everyone here - dip****s, geniuses, average folks - thinks of you as
a time-wasting, bloated-ego buffoon.

On 3/20/2012 11:35 AM, George Plimpton wrote:

The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility, maturity
and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you
seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult
conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be
able
to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and obnoxious to
even be amusing.

You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all that
you
show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out your
errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid political
stances other than left/right or that there are people like me far to
the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are.

David


Your redundancy in continuing to repost the same message over and over
only serves to highlight your lack of intellect.

No, it serves as a helpful reminder of what a buffoon you are.


Only a dip**** thinks that.

No, everyone here - dip****s, geniuses, average folks - thinks of you as
a time-wasting, bloated-ego buffoon.

I don't think that is any worse than being though of as persnickety,
wimpy, little weasel, like you are.

Hawke

On 3/21/2012 2:02 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/20/2012 11:35 AM, George Plimpton wrote:

The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility,
maturity
and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you
seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult
conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be
able
to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and obnoxious to
even be amusing.

You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all that
you
show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out your
errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid political
stances other than left/right or that there are people like me far to
the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are.

David


Your redundancy in continuing to repost the same message over and over
only serves to highlight your lack of intellect.

No, it serves as a helpful reminder of what a buffoon you are.


Only a dip**** thinks that.

No, everyone here - dip****s, geniuses, average folks - thinks of you as
a time-wasting, bloated-ego buffoon.

I don't think that is any worse than being though of as persnickety,
wimpy, little weasel, like you are.

I don't think most people think of me that way. I think a lot of people
here think I'm a jerk, but they don't think of me as you described.

On 3/21/2012 4:55 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 3/21/2012 2:02 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/20/2012 11:35 AM, George Plimpton wrote:

The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility,
maturity
and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you
seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult
conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be
able
to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and
obnoxious to
even be amusing.

You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all that
you
show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out your
errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid
political
stances other than left/right or that there are people like me
far to
the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are.

David


Your redundancy in continuing to repost the same message over and
over
only serves to highlight your lack of intellect.

No, it serves as a helpful reminder of what a buffoon you are.


Only a dip**** thinks that.

No, everyone here - dip****s, geniuses, average folks - thinks of you as
a time-wasting, bloated-ego buffoon.

I don't think that is any worse than being though of as persnickety,
wimpy, little weasel, like you are.

I don't think most people think of me that way. I think a lot of people
here think I'm a jerk, but they don't think of me as you described.


That's probably because you haven't been all over them for miniscule and
trivial issues....yet.

Hawke

On 3/21/2012 5:35 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/21/2012 4:55 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 3/21/2012 2:02 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/20/2012 11:35 AM, George Plimpton wrote:

The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility,
maturity
and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you
seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult
conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight to be
able
to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and
obnoxious to
even be amusing.

You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all
that
you
show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out
your
errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid
political
stances other than left/right or that there are people like me
far to
the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are.

David


Your redundancy in continuing to repost the same message over and
over
only serves to highlight your lack of intellect.

No, it serves as a helpful reminder of what a buffoon you are.


Only a dip**** thinks that.

No, everyone here - dip****s, geniuses, average folks - thinks of
you as
a time-wasting, bloated-ego buffoon.

I don't think that is any worse than being though of as persnickety,
wimpy, little weasel, like you are.

I don't think most people think of me that way. I think a lot of people
here think I'm a jerk, but they don't think of me as you described.


That's probably because you haven't been all over them for miniscule and
trivial issues....yet.

That's because they don't engage in slovenly **** hemorrhages all over
Usenet the way you do.

On 3/21/2012 8:48 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 3/21/2012 5:35 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/21/2012 4:55 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 3/21/2012 2:02 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/20/2012 11:35 AM, George Plimpton wrote:

The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility,
maturity
and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes you
seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult
conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight
to be
able
to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and
obnoxious to
even be amusing.

You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all
that
you
show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out
your
errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid
political
stances other than left/right or that there are people like me
far to
the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are.

David


Your redundancy in continuing to repost the same message over and
over
only serves to highlight your lack of intellect.

No, it serves as a helpful reminder of what a buffoon you are.


Only a dip**** thinks that.

No, everyone here - dip****s, geniuses, average folks - thinks of
you as
a time-wasting, bloated-ego buffoon.

I don't think that is any worse than being though of as persnickety,
wimpy, little weasel, like you are.

I don't think most people think of me that way. I think a lot of people
here think I'm a jerk, but they don't think of me as you described.


That's probably because you haven't been all over them for miniscule and
trivial issues....yet.

That's because they don't engage in slovenly **** hemorrhages all over
Usenet the way you do.


That's a total crock. The idea that I'm somehow far worse than the
average person here when it comes to what I write is preposterous on
it's face, and not only is there no proof of that but there is no way to
prove it even if you wanted to.

The other side of the coin is that you seem to think you're some kind of
model of how things are supposed to be done. Why you think that is a
mystery. You are nothing but an ordinary college graduate, if you can be
believed, yet you think you are a master when it comes to the newsgroup.
One thing is for sure, your actual arguments are nothing special. You
can make a real ruckus over the insignificant errors you think I make
but you aren't really very good at actually debating anything. If you
are how about showing an example where your excellence can be seen.

All I hear from you is yes I am, no you aren't, it's true, no it's not,
and things like that. The point is you're way off in how you rate
yourself. I mean, over rate yourself. The objective view of your ability
doesn't show you as all that great, but you apparently believe that you
are far superior at least to me. You have only shown you can nitpick and
not much else. What's so great about that?

Hawke

On 3/22/2012 11:28 AM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/21/2012 8:48 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 3/21/2012 5:35 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/21/2012 4:55 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 3/21/2012 2:02 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/20/2012 11:35 AM, George Plimpton wrote:

The problem is that you have displayed so little credibility,
maturity
and accumulated wisdom in your typical posts that no one takes
you
seriously. You come on like a little boy trying to join an adult
conversation, but you just don't have enough depth of insight
to be
able
to make a useful contribution, plus you're too petty and
obnoxious to
even be amusing.

You make big noises about your alleged poli sci degree, but all
that
you
show us is that left = good, right(as in, anyone who points out
your
errors)= bad. You can't even recognize that there are valid
political
stances other than left/right or that there are people like me
far to
the left of you who see you for the shallow poseur that you are.

David


Your redundancy in continuing to repost the same message over and
over
only serves to highlight your lack of intellect.

No, it serves as a helpful reminder of what a buffoon you are.


Only a dip**** thinks that.

No, everyone here - dip****s, geniuses, average folks - thinks of
you as
a time-wasting, bloated-ego buffoon.

I don't think that is any worse than being though of as persnickety,
wimpy, little weasel, like you are.

I don't think most people think of me that way. I think a lot of people
here think I'm a jerk, but they don't think of me as you described.


That's probably because you haven't been all over them for miniscule and
trivial issues....yet.

That's because they don't engage in slovenly **** hemorrhages all over
Usenet the way you do.


That's a total crock.

No, it isn't. You do, and they don't.


The other side of the coin is that you seem to think you're some kind of
model of how things are supposed to be done.

Nope. Once again, you get that all wrong. I never say how much I know;
I point out how little you know and how you get everything wrong.
You're not a very high hurdle to surmount.



All I hear from you is yes I am, no you aren't, it's true, no it's not,
and things like that.

All I hear from you is your knee-jerk far-left, uneducated political
sentiment, and your misremembered pseudo-quotes from down-market
televised book club talks.

On 3/22/2012 4:04 PM, George Plimpton wrote:

The other side of the coin is that you seem to think you're some kind of
model of how things are supposed to be done.

Nope. Once again, you get that all wrong. I never say how much I know; I
point out how little you know and how you get everything wrong. You're
not a very high hurdle to surmount.

Just because you are afraid of the truth and continually try to avoid
reality doesn't mean the rest of us do. It's like this little lie of
yours about just being an honest critic of me, as if that is all there
is to it. There's always more to it. It's obvious that you think you
know better. But instead of showing you are you have failed to prove
your accusations. Even if I've made mistakes here and there that doesn't
prove what you are alleging. If you aren't better than me in the areas
you point out then how can you criticize me at all? So it does mean you
think you're better when you try to put to put me down. Pretending
otherwise is a form of lying.

Any time you put me down for being stupid or wrong it implies that you
are not. Calling me short implies you aren't. Calling me fat implies
that you aren't and so on. Making accusations against someone puts you
in a position where you are forcing them to defend their actions. It
automatically puts someone on the defensive. Maybe you don't know any of
those things but I do. Just the tone and position you take and the
accusations you make makes you the accuser and me the defender. But you
aren't in any position to pass judgment on me. You don't have enough
facts available to you to make an intelligent decision on the matter,
but you presume you do. Just like you are presuming your superiority,
which I have yet to see any evidence of.




All I hear from you is yes I am, no you aren't, it's true, no it's not,
and things like that.

All I hear from you is your knee-jerk far-left, uneducated political
sentiment, and your misremembered pseudo-quotes from down-market
televised book club talks.



First off, what you hear from me about politics is not uneducated
political sentiment. It is the views and opinions of someone well versed
in politics and that has a degree in the field. So it's not what you get
from the man on the street and it's not what you have unfairly labelled
it. It's also coming from a source that is more knowledgeable than you
are no matter how much you deny it.

You just don't agree with it because it is contrary to your preferred
right wing/conservative ideology. You can't pretend you aren't coming
from a partisan point of view. It's not that what I say is wrong in
general, it is wrong if you're a political opponent though, isn't it? So
you keep pretending that it's just my lack of precision that you take
offense to. I'll know better than that. I'll know that you just don't
like to hear anything you perceive as liberal views because of your
extreme political ideology.

Hawke

"Hawke" wrote in message
...

First off, what you hear from me about politics is not uneducated
political sentiment. It is the views and opinions of someone well versed
in politics and that has a degree in the field. So it's not what you get
from the man on the street and it's not what you have unfairly labelled
it. It's also coming from a source that is more knowledgeable than you are
no matter how much you deny it.


Enough with the degree, Hawke. You should have given up on this thread a
long time ago. I don't know why I'm even reading it, it's like a Usenet
train wreck.

On 3/24/2012 12:01 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/22/2012 4:04 PM, George Plimpton wrote:

The other side of the coin is that you seem to think you're some kind of
model of how things are supposed to be done.

Nope. Once again, you get that all wrong. I never say how much I know; I
point out how little you know and how you get everything wrong. You're
not a very high hurdle to surmount.

Just because you are afraid of the truth and

You have no valid reason to believe I am afraid of any truth. You
haven't written anything you can document as being truth.


Any time you put me down for being stupid or wrong it implies that you
are not.

In fact, I'm not.


All I hear from you is yes I am, no you aren't, it's true, no it's not,
and things like that.

All I hear from you is your knee-jerk far-left, uneducated political
sentiment, and your misremembered pseudo-quotes from down-market
televised book club talks.



First off, what you hear from me about politics is not uneducated
political sentiment.

That's exactly what it is. It's *nothing* but sentiment, poorly thought
out and irrational.

On 3/24/2012 12:14 PM, ATP wrote:
wrote in message
...

First off, what you hear from me about politics is not uneducated
political sentiment. It is the views and opinions of someone well versed
in politics and that has a degree in the field. So it's not what you get
from the man on the street and it's not what you have unfairly labelled
it. It's also coming from a source that is more knowledgeable than you are
no matter how much you deny it.


Enough with the degree, Hawke. You should have given up on this thread a
long time ago. I don't know why I'm even reading it, it's like a Usenet
train wreck.


The minute people with no education or training in political science
stop pretending to be experts in the field I will say no more. But as
long as uneducated, and ignorant people continue to claim they know more
than me, I will keep asking them to show their credentials the way I'm
willing to show mine.

Hawke

On 3/24/2012 12:25 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 3/24/2012 12:01 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/22/2012 4:04 PM, George Plimpton wrote:

The other side of the coin is that you seem to think you're some
kind of
model of how things are supposed to be done.

Nope. Once again, you get that all wrong. I never say how much I know; I
point out how little you know and how you get everything wrong. You're
not a very high hurdle to surmount.

Just because you are afraid of the truth and

You have no valid reason to believe I am afraid of any truth. You
haven't written anything you can document as being truth.

You don't want the truth because you aren't seeking it. All you want to
do it nit pick irrelevant points. And there you go making another claim
you can't prove. Why do you keep doing that? I'm not going to bother
knocking down baseless claims. If you say I haven't written ANYTHING I
can document as being truth it's up to you to prove that, not me. That
means if you can show ANYTHING I've written is the truth then your claim
is wrong. It won't take long because I always tell the truth. Get to work.



Any time you put me down for being stupid or wrong it implies that you
are not.

In fact, I'm not.

Yeah, well neither am I.



All I hear from you is yes I am, no you aren't, it's true, no it's not,
and things like that.

All I hear from you is your knee-jerk far-left, uneducated political
sentiment, and your misremembered pseudo-quotes from down-market
televised book club talks.



First off, what you hear from me about politics is not uneducated
political sentiment.

That's exactly what it is. It's *nothing* but sentiment, poorly thought
out and irrational.


If that is what is coming from me what makes you think that what's
coming from you isn't even worse? Your ego?


Hawke

On 3/24/2012 1:30 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/24/2012 12:25 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 3/24/2012 12:01 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/22/2012 4:04 PM, George Plimpton wrote:

The other side of the coin is that you seem to think you're some
kind of
model of how things are supposed to be done.

Nope. Once again, you get that all wrong. I never say how much I
know; I
point out how little you know and how you get everything wrong. You're
not a very high hurdle to surmount.

Just because you are afraid of the truth and

You have no valid reason to believe I am afraid of any truth. You
haven't written anything you can document as being truth.

You don't want the truth because

You have no valid reason to believe I am afraid of any truth. You
haven't written anything you can document as being truth.


Any time you put me down for being stupid or wrong it implies that you
are not.

In fact, I'm not.

Yeah, well neither am I.

You are. You're stupid mainly because you're too biased to acknowledge
truths that you find inconvenient, but you're even more stupid because
of how incompetent you are.


All I hear from you is yes I am, no you aren't, it's true, no it's
not,
and things like that.

All I hear from you is your knee-jerk far-left, uneducated political
sentiment, and your misremembered pseudo-quotes from down-market
televised book club talks.



First off, what you hear from me about politics is not uneducated
political sentiment.

That's exactly what it is. It's *nothing* but sentiment, poorly thought
out and irrational.

On 3/24/2012 3:21 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
=
Just because you are afraid of the truth and

You have no valid reason to believe I am afraid of any truth. You
haven't written anything you can document as being truth.

You don't want the truth because

You have no valid reason to believe I am afraid of any truth. You
haven't written anything you can document as being truth.

I have plenty of reasons to know you fear the truth. Your actions show
it constantly. When you deny everything that I say and demand proof it
says you don't know the facts yourself. You can't stand the idea that I
actually know what I'm talking about. If I am then that makes you look
stupid. So you don't want to hear the truth especially if it means that
something I said is corroborated as being true. It means all your
accusations against me are false. So of course you are afraid of the
truth. It would make you look foolish.

You also need to keep in mind that whether I "document" anything or not
has no bearing on whether it's true. I don't make things up. When I tell
you something it is the truth or I wouldn't say it. But like any other
human some times I make a mistake. Not often, but sometimes. You seem
not to know that applies to everyone including you. You don't get that
when I say something it has a very high probability of it being true. If
you understood that fact you wouldn't have any reason to want
documentation for everything.





Any time you put me down for being stupid or wrong it implies that you
are not.

In fact, I'm not.

Yeah, well neither am I.

You are. You're stupid mainly because you're too biased to acknowledge
truths that you find inconvenient, but you're even more stupid because
of how incompetent you are.

Biased, incompetent, stupid, got any more? Those are just nasty personal
attacks and you never really prove any of them are true. You just throw
them out there and see if anything sticks. Nothing does because you
don't ever prove I'm incompetent, or stupid, or biased. You just say it.
You don't prove anything. I told you I can't stand republicans. Does
than mean I'm biased? If I am I told you. You didn't prove anything. So
other than being anti republican, which I happily admitted, you proved
nothing. Your accusations that you keep throwing out but never proving
are becoming extremely boring to listen to.



All I hear from you is yes I am, no you aren't, it's true, no it's
not,
and things like that.

All I hear from you is your knee-jerk far-left, uneducated political
sentiment, and your misremembered pseudo-quotes from down-market
televised book club talks.



First off, what you hear from me about politics is not uneducated
political sentiment.

That's exactly what it is. It's *nothing* but sentiment, poorly thought
out and irrational.

If that's your opinion you're entitled to it. It's a free country. But
then, it happens that is nothing but the opinion of one man. As we all
know, you are no expert on politics and are basically a laymen on the
subject. That being the case I have to look at your criticism in that
light. An ordinary guy doesn't think much of my views. Okay. Fine with
me. It's easy to brush off because you have no reputation, no expertise,
and no credentials either. So your opinion about me I take as important
as you saying you don't like Butter Pecan ice cream. In other words, who
the **** cares what you think? You're just an ordinary character like
Archie Bunker. I got your opinion. I don't think it amounts to a hill of
beans.

Hawke

On 3/25/2012 4:34 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/24/2012 3:21 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
=
Just because you are afraid of the truth and

You have no valid reason to believe I am afraid of any truth. You
haven't written anything you can document as being truth.

You don't want the truth because

You have no valid reason to believe I am afraid of any truth. You
haven't written anything you can document as being truth.

I have plenty of reasons to know you fear the truth.

Nope.


Any time you put me down for being stupid or wrong it implies that you
are not.

In fact, I'm not.

Yeah, well neither am I.

You are. You're stupid mainly because you're too biased to acknowledge
truths that you find inconvenient, but you're even more stupid because
of how incompetent you are.

Biased, incompetent, stupid, got any more?

Those are more than sufficient taken in isolation. Taken together, they
mean you're ****.


All I hear from you is yes I am, no you aren't, it's true, no it's
not,
and things like that.

All I hear from you is your knee-jerk far-left, uneducated political
sentiment, and your misremembered pseudo-quotes from down-market
televised book club talks.



First off, what you hear from me about politics is not uneducated
political sentiment.

That's exactly what it is. It's *nothing* but sentiment, poorly thought
out and irrational.

If that's your opinion you're entitled to it.

It's a fact.

On 3/27/2012 11:39 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 3/25/2012 4:34 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/24/2012 3:21 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
=
Just because you are afraid of the truth and

You have no valid reason to believe I am afraid of any truth. You
haven't written anything you can document as being truth.

You don't want the truth because

You have no valid reason to believe I am afraid of any truth. You
haven't written anything you can document as being truth.

I have plenty of reasons to know you fear the truth.

Nope.


Any time you put me down for being stupid or wrong it implies that
you
are not.

In fact, I'm not.

Yeah, well neither am I.

You are. You're stupid mainly because you're too biased to acknowledge
truths that you find inconvenient, but you're even more stupid because
of how incompetent you are.

Biased, incompetent, stupid, got any more?

Those are more than sufficient taken in isolation. Taken together, they
mean you're ****.

This is you. Take a good look. No facts, no evidence, all one man's
opinion. All negative. All personal attacks with no evidence and no
ability to make an intelligent argument. You're basically just a name
caller. This is the kind of guy who is saying all the lousy things about
me.

All I can say is looking at what you are and considering the source of
the criticism I'm more than happy to have it. Any time a looney,
libertarian, out on the political fringe, is critical of me that's a
good thing. Coming from a fool and a hypocrite nothing you say is
credible. You're an empty suit and a lightweight.


All I hear from you is yes I am, no you aren't, it's true, no it's
not,
and things like that.

All I hear from you is your knee-jerk far-left, uneducated political
sentiment, and your misremembered pseudo-quotes from down-market
televised book club talks.



First off, what you hear from me about politics is not uneducated
political sentiment.

That's exactly what it is. It's *nothing* but sentiment, poorly
thought
out and irrational.

If that's your opinion you're entitled to it.

It's a fact.

You wouldn't know a fact if one slapped you in the face. All you have is
your own biased, subjective, slanted, and ill informed opinions. You're
not good.

Hawke

On 3/28/2012 1:56 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/27/2012 11:39 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 3/25/2012 4:34 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/24/2012 3:21 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
=
Just because you are afraid of the truth and

You have no valid reason to believe I am afraid of any truth. You
haven't written anything you can document as being truth.

You don't want the truth because

You have no valid reason to believe I am afraid of any truth. You
haven't written anything you can document as being truth.

I have plenty of reasons to know you fear the truth.

Nope.


Any time you put me down for being stupid or wrong it implies that
you
are not.

In fact, I'm not.

Yeah, well neither am I.

You are. You're stupid mainly because you're too biased to acknowledge
truths that you find inconvenient, but you're even more stupid because
of how incompetent you are.

Biased, incompetent, stupid, got any more?

Those are more than sufficient taken in isolation. Taken together, they
mean you're ****.

This is you. Take a good look. No facts, no evidence, all one man's
opinion.

That's you. You just wrote your own Usenet bio. It's the first
accurate thing you've said about yourself.



All I hear from you is yes I am, no you aren't, it's true, no it's
not,
and things like that.

All I hear from you is your knee-jerk far-left, uneducated
political
sentiment, and your misremembered pseudo-quotes from down-market
televised book club talks.



First off, what you hear from me about politics is not uneducated
political sentiment.

That's exactly what it is. It's *nothing* but sentiment, poorly
thought
out and irrational.

If that's your opinion you're entitled to it.

It's a fact.

You wouldn't know a fact if one slapped you in the face.

I know facts, and I know you have no acquaintance with them at all.

On 3/28/2012 1:58 PM, George Plimpton wrote:

You are. You're stupid mainly because you're too biased to acknowledge
truths that you find inconvenient, but you're even more stupid because
of how incompetent you are.

Biased, incompetent, stupid, got any more?

Those are more than sufficient taken in isolation. Taken together, they
mean you're ****.

This is you. Take a good look. No facts, no evidence, all one man's
opinion.

That's you. You just wrote your own Usenet bio. It's the first accurate
thing you've said about yourself.

That's why you just wrote. Not me. Try as you will you can't pin on me
what is in plain sight for everyone to see. You keep making claims about
me that are just your opinion, so you don't have any facts or evidence.
If you had any we could read it. You've got nothing. Like always.




All I hear from you is yes I am, no you aren't, it's true, no
it's
not,
and things like that.

All I hear from you is your knee-jerk far-left, uneducated
political
sentiment, and your misremembered pseudo-quotes from down-market
televised book club talks.



First off, what you hear from me about politics is not uneducated
political sentiment.

That's exactly what it is. It's *nothing* but sentiment, poorly
thought
out and irrational.

If that's your opinion you're entitled to it.

It's a fact.

You wouldn't know a fact if one slapped you in the face.

I know facts, and I know you have no acquaintance with them at all.

If you know any it is clear that you never use any to prove anything.
With you it's just. Yep, nope, that's you, it's true, blah, blah, blah.
Good thing you never went into the legal field. They require facts and
you never bring any to the table. All you have is your own biased
opinions. That's it.

Hawke

On 3/29/2012 4:41 PM, Hawke wrote:
On 3/28/2012 1:58 PM, George Plimpton wrote:

You are. You're stupid mainly because you're too biased to
acknowledge
truths that you find inconvenient, but you're even more stupid
because
of how incompetent you are.

Biased, incompetent, stupid, got any more?

Those are more than sufficient taken in isolation. Taken together, they
mean you're ****.

This is you. Take a good look. No facts, no evidence, all one man's
opinion.

That's you. You just wrote your own Usenet bio. It's the first accurate
thing you've said about yourself.

That's why you just wrote.

"Why"? You idiot.

You wrote your own Usenet bio, kid. "No facts, no evidence, all one
[kid's] opinion." That's you.



All I hear from you is yes I am, no you aren't, it's true, no
it's
not,
and things like that.

All I hear from you is your knee-jerk far-left, uneducated
political
sentiment, and your misremembered pseudo-quotes from down-market
televised book club talks.



First off, what you hear from me about politics is not uneducated
political sentiment.

That's exactly what it is. It's *nothing* but sentiment, poorly
thought
out and irrational.

If that's your opinion you're entitled to it.

It's a fact.

You wouldn't know a fact if one slapped you in the face.

I know facts, and I know you have no acquaintance with them at all.

If you know any it is clear that you never use any to prove anything.

All I need is one basic fact: the fact you don't know any facts. That
works fine.