Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
CDCO is cheaper than Enco
http://www.cdcotools.com/index.php
I have ordered a couple times: Digital Outside Micrometers T - Handle Hex Set T - Handle Hex Set Piloted Spindle Tapper Piloted Spindle Tapper 60° Center Gage 115 PC H.S.S. Drill Bits Set Turning and Facing Tool Holder For Tool Post: BXA or 200 Series Those drill sets are so cheap, it is not worth my time to inventory drills, I just buy more sets. |
#2
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
CDCO is cheaper than Enco
" fired this volley
in news:7f8f7124-995a-4669-bf89-0877d8669306 @b38g2000prf.googlegroups.com: Those drill sets are so cheap, it is not worth my time to inventory drills, I just buy more sets. I find the opposite. Those Chinalloy bits are so poorly made of such a lousy alloy, and so badly ground, that they last about 1/10 the hole depth of good American bits. They're also often not precisely of the correct diameters. I'd rather spend my money on bits I can periodically re-touch and have them last years. LLoyd |
#3
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
CDCO is cheaper than Enco
On 2009-01-18, Lloyd E. Sponenburgh lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote:
" fired this volley in news:7f8f7124-995a-4669-bf89-0877d8669306 @b38g2000prf.googlegroups.com: Those drill sets are so cheap, it is not worth my time to inventory drills, I just buy more sets. I find the opposite. Those Chinalloy bits are so poorly made of such a lousy alloy, and so badly ground, that they last about 1/10 the hole depth of good American bits. They're also often not precisely of the correct diameters. I'd rather spend my money on bits I can periodically re-touch and have them last years. I had a very negative experience with the cheapest drills. They might be mild steel that is TIN coated. The fail in the hole and then the only thing that can get drilling to continue, is carbide. I use cheap drills to drill through aluminum or drywall or some other stuff like this. -- Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by more readers you will need to find a different means of posting on Usenet. http://improve-usenet.org/ |
#4
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
CDCO is cheaper than Enco
Keywords:
In article , "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh" lloydspinsidemindspring.com wrote: " fired this volley in news:7f8f7124-995a-4669-bf89-0877d8669306 : Those drill sets are so cheap, it is not worth my time to inventory drills, I just buy more sets. I find the opposite. Those Chinalloy bits are so poorly made of such a lousy alloy, and so badly ground, that they last about 1/10 the hole depth of good American bits. They're also often not precisely of the correct diameters. I'd rather spend my money on bits I can periodically re-touch and have them last years. A while back, I bought one of the big drill sets on sale from Enco or MSC. I got one with the combined letter, number & fractional drills. I decided to get the middle-ground "no name" HSS american made set, as opposed to the cheap import set, or the very expensive name-brand US set. They are a mixed bag, but have served me very well. Some of the drills have no size marking on them, some are nicely etched, and some are stamped so deep I have to stone them to get them to run true. The one rude surpise I got was with a number drill about 0.1" in diameter. I chucked it up after checking the shank for severe stamping ridges, and went to work. It just wouldn't cut, even in aluminum, and after a few attempts, I took it out and examined the business end. The point was ground "backwards", in that the heel was higher than the cutting edge (negative lip angle)! Since then, I check the point of every bit before I use it. So far that's the only one I've found. The steel seems to be generally high quality, and there rest are all nice & sharp. Doug White |
#5
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
CDCO is cheaper than Enco
" wrote:
Those drill sets are so cheap, it is not worth my time to inventory drills, I just buy more sets. I think I'll stick to PTD brand. Never had luck with cheap drill bits. Wes |
#6
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
CDCO is cheaper than Enco
On Jan 18, 3:07*pm, Wes wrote:
" wrote: Those drill sets are so cheap, it is not worth my time to inventory drills, I just buy more sets. I think I'll stick to PTD brand. *Never had luck with cheap drill bits. Wes I have had bad cheap drill experiences in the past, but the 115 drill set I got for $35 from CDCO was very good. I think a good test is to drill mild steel with a 1/8" drill, as I have envelopes full of 1/8" drill, so I can sacrifice it. Drill fast and hard with coolant. The drill should drill fast and stay sharp. The CDCO set passes this test. Correct me if I am wrong. |
#7
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
CDCO is cheaper than Enco
went to work. *It just wouldn't cut, even in aluminum, and after a few attempts, I took it out and examined the business end. *The point was ground "backwards", in that the heel was higher than the cutting edge (negative lip angle)! *Since then, I check the point of every bit before I use it. *So far that's the only one I've found. *The steel seems to be generally high quality, and there rest are all nice & sharp. * Doug White I found the same thing once. Wouldn't drill at all. I kept checking to make sure I was turning the right way, and then once I check the drill bit, I saw the problem. Reground it to a proper angle and it worked fine after. JW |
#8
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
CDCO is cheaper than Enco
On Jan 19, 9:48*am, jw wrote:
went to work. *It just wouldn't cut, even in aluminum, and after a few attempts, I took it out and examined the business end. *The point was ground "backwards", in that the heel was higher than the cutting edge (negative lip angle)! *Since then, I check the point of every bit before I use it. *So far that's the only one I've found. *The steel seems to be generally high quality, and there rest are all nice & sharp. * Doug White I found the same thing once. *Wouldn't drill at all. *I kept checking to make sure I was turning the right way, and then once I check the drill bit, I saw the problem. *Reground it to a proper angle and it worked fine after. JW The $35 CDCO drills are drilling as fast and staying sharp on a par with the Precision Twist Drill Company Crystal Lake IL and Triumph twist drill also of Crystal Lake IL. I don't know if the quality I a getting is a temporary fluke or if the Chinese have figured out how to make drills. |
#9
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
CDCO is cheaper than Enco
" fired this volley in
: I don't know if the quality I a getting is a temporary fluke or if the Chinese have figured out how to make drills. IF they're made from M2AL alloy, they're probably as good as the US bits, assuming they're also sized and ground correctly. Usually, they'll specify that if it's the case. (they're pretty proud of that alloy, when they decide to spend the money on it and the heat- treatment it requires). LLoyd |
#11
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
CDCO is cheaper than Enco
" wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong. China quality is hit or miss. Glad you got a hit. Wes |
#12
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
CDCO is cheaper than Enco
On Jan 19, 3:16*pm, Wes wrote:
" wrote: Correct me if I am wrong. China quality is hit or miss. *Glad you got a hit. Wes Someone asked me if the drills are ground or forged. They are ground like the expensive US made drills. The tool holders for the lathe are so cheap, I can buy more and have more tools ready to put on the lathe in a moment. http://www.cdcotools.com/index.php |
#13
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
CDCO is cheaper than Enco
" wrote:
The tool holders for the lathe are so cheap, I can buy more and have more tools ready to put on the lathe in a moment. http://www.cdcotools.com/index.php Now the AXA series tool holders seem to be pretty good. I have quite a few. Lathe came with a real Aloris tool post and CDCO's fit it fine. I did get one that required a bit more rotation of the locking lever but still usable. Wes -- "Additionally as a security officer, I carry a gun to protect government officials but my life isn't worth protecting at home in their eyes." Dick Anthony Heller |
#14
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
CDCO is cheaper than Enco
On Jan 23, 5:13*pm, Wes wrote:
" wrote: The tool holders for the lathe are so cheap, I can buy more and have more tools ready to put on the lathe in a moment. http://www.cdcotools.com/index.php Now the AXA series tool holders seem to be pretty good. *I have quite a few. *Lathe came with a real Aloris tool post and CDCO's fit it fine. *I did get one *that required a bit more rotation of the locking lever but still usable. Wes -- The tool holders are what got me started there. My brother's shop and mine both soak up lathe tool holders at the CDCO price. |
#15
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
CDCO is cheaper than Enco
Keywords:
In article , " wrote: On Jan 23, 5:13=A0pm, Wes wrote: " wrote: The tool holders for the lathe are so cheap, I can buy more and have more tools ready to put on the lathe in a moment. http://www.cdcotools.com/index.php Now the AXA series tool holders seem to be pretty good. =A0I have quite a= few. =A0Lathe came with a real Aloris tool post and CDCO's fit it fine. =A0I did get one =A0= that required a bit more rotation of the locking lever but still usable. The tool holders are what got me started there. My brother's shop and mine both soak up lathe tool holders at the CDCO price. Any idea how hard they are? I occasionally need to modify them, and the real McCoy are at least case hardened. The most common thing is that I need to knock ~50 mils off the bottom to use 1/2" tooling because my compound is just a bit high. I've found the Phase II holders are easier to machine, but the CDCO's are even cheaper. Doug White |
#16
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
CDCO is cheaper than Enco
|
#17
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pinging Wes (Was: CDCO is cheaper than Enco)
|
#18
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Pinging Wes (Was: CDCO is cheaper than Enco)
|
#19
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
CDCO is cheaper than Enco
Wes wrote:
(Doug White) wrote: The tool holders are what got me started there. My brother's shop and mine both soak up lathe tool holders at the CDCO price. Any idea how hard they are? I occasionally need to modify them, and the real McCoy are at least case hardened. The most common thing is that I need to knock ~50 mils off the bottom to use 1/2" tooling because my compound is just a bit high. I've found the Phase II holders are easier to machine, but the CDCO's are even cheaper. I'll try to remember to take one to work to check Rc. Might take me a day or so to get to it but I'll post back to this thread. Feel free to jog my memory if I forget. Wes Almost forgot. I took a few measurements across the bottom of a CDCO AXA holder. 44.3, 40.7, 48.3, 45.4 Then thinking about your comment on case, I checked on both sides of the ground surface. 46.2, 45.8 on the Rc scale. Instrument is in calibration. Average of all readings is 45.1 Rc. Wes |
#21
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
CDCO is cheaper than Enco
|
#22
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
CDCO is cheaper than Enco
On Feb 11, 3:42*pm, Wes wrote:
(Doug White) wrote: Average of all readings is 45.1 Rc. Thanks! *That's still pretty hard, but manageable with carbide end mills. It makes me think they are at least trying to produce a quality product, unlike a lot of import stuff. If I can find time, I'll try to measure an Aloris CXA block just for reference. * Wes The cut off tool, I just took out and used. It is for a tool that is . 720" high and is marked "Phase II". All my cut off bits were higher. I ground one down. I it worked very well. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Enco vs. KBC | Metalworking | |||
CDCO Machinery Corp. 3 Axis DRO | Metalworking | |||
Enco quality?? | Metalworking | |||
ENCO again | Metalworking |