Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
--Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on
gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. -- "Steamboat Ed" Haas : Never thought I'd live to see Hacking the Trailing Edge! : our "iron curtain" crumble... www.nmpproducts.com ---Decks a-wash in a sea of words--- |
#2
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
steamer wrote:
--Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. My dad tells of his remembrance of his grandfather trying to get Model T engines to run on nitroglycerin. This was on a very large ranch back in the 30's, when and where having explosives around was not considered a big deal. He was just a pup and doesn't recall much more than his grandfather got an engine to idle, but any attempt to run above idle would blow the engines. He said there was a pile of engines outside the barn with a variety of failures you would not expect to see in an engine. Would give about anything to have a good picture of that pile... Jon |
#3
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
steamer wrote:
--Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. I know there were a variety of tractors that used a 'shotgun' like shell as a starting mechanism. Not sure how common it was. Pete -- Pete Snell Department of Physics Royal Military College Kingston, Ontario, Canada ----------------------------------------------------------------------- All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) |
#4
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
On Nov 21, 10:45*am, steamer wrote:
* * * * --Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. -- * * * * "Steamboat Ed" Haas * * * * : *Never thought I'd live to see * * * * Hacking the Trailing Edge! *: *our "iron curtain" crumble... * * * * * * * * * * * * *www.nmpproducts.com * * * * * * * * * *---Decks a-wash in a sea of words--- I saw the Mythbuster episode where they tried to make an engine run on Blackpowder. I am not sure exactly when the first semi-automatic rifle was Patented (John Browning?) but it seem to me that it would be pretty simple to place a piston attached to a rod in the place of a bullet in a rifle barrel. Have an exhaust port close to the end of the barrel that reloads a new charge of powder just like the gas mechanism used in autoloaders. A return spring would bring the rod and piston back in the barrel to allow another shot. Have the rod and piston in the barrel set up with a rack & pinion gear to provide power. Black powder might burn to fast to make it work but with different rates of burn with modern powders the combustion processes could be fine tuned and might make the idea work. It would probably be too inefficient to be practical but it would be an interesting project. If anyone does it I sure would like to see another episode about it on Mythbusters. Dennis |
#5
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
Pete Snell wrote:
steamer wrote: --Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. I know there were a variety of tractors that used a 'shotgun' like shell as a starting mechanism. Not sure how common it was. That's a Kauffmann starter, also used in a lot of aircraft up to the F-4, at least. it was a pretty big shell (at least for an F-4) with a SLOW-burning powder. it would give about 15 seconds of continuous gas production. Jon |
#6
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
Pete Snell wrote:
steamer wrote: --Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. I know there were a variety of tractors that used a 'shotgun' like shell as a starting mechanism. Not sure how common it was. Pete Some piston aircraft engines too IIRC. Jeff -- Jeffry Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE) The speed of light is 1.8*10^12 furlongs per fortnight. |
#7
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
"Jon Anderson" wrote: (clip) his grandfather got an engine to idle, but any attempt to run above idle would blow the engines. He said there was a pile of engines outside the barn with a variety of failures you would not expect to see in an engine. (clip) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ What his grandfather didn't understand is that you don't want the charge in the cylinder to *explode*. You want it to burn as evenly as possible on the power stroke. That is what anti-knock is all about. |
#8
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
steamer wrote:
--Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. Mr. Diesel (Rudolf I think) was killed trying to make an engine run on coal dust if I remember right. BobH |
#9
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
BobH wrote:
steamer wrote: --Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. Mr. Diesel (Rudolf I think) was killed trying to make an engine run on coal dust if I remember right. BobH ISTR an article many years ago in I think PopSci about a turbine fired with coal dust . A bit more abrasive than steam I'd think ... -- Snag '90 Ultra "Strider" '39 WLDD "Popcycle" Buncha cars and a truck |
#10
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
"BobH" wrote in message .. . steamer wrote: --Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. Mr. Diesel (Rudolf I think) was killed trying to make an engine run on coal dust if I remember right. BobH He was injured in the explosion (for the second time in his life; the first time was when a steam engine of his design, which used ammonia for a working medium, blew up on him), but it didn't kill him. He was lost overboard on a steamship -- possibly a suicide. -- Ed Huntress |
#11
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
On Nov 21, 5:13*pm, BobH
wrote: ... Mr. Diesel (Rudolf I think) was killed trying to make an engine run on coal dust if I remember right. BobH Diesel's mysterious fate: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Diesel Gunpowder engine, etc: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History...bustion_engine Wooden motorcycle: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gottlieb_Daimler |
#12
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
Jon Elson wrote:
That's a Kauffmann starter, also used in a lot of aircraft up to the F-4, at least. it was a pretty big shell (at least for an F-4) with a SLOW-burning powder. it would give about 15 seconds of continuous gas production. I think the USAF used them. The Marine F4J and F4S I worked on required compressed air to start. Wes |
#13
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
Leo Lichtman wrote:
What his grandfather didn't understand is that you don't want the charge in the cylinder to *explode*. You want it to burn as evenly as possible on the power stroke. That is what anti-knock is all about. And how do you -know- he didn't understand that? He got the engines to run, which meant the nitro was burning. He just couldn't control things well enough to do much beyond that. Admittedly, it was shade tree engineering. But I'd bet money if Great-Grandpa were around to be questioned, he would certainly know the difference between burning and exploding with respect to internal combustion engines. Jon |
#14
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
Pete Snell wrote:
steamer wrote: --Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. I know there were a variety of tractors that used a 'shotgun' like shell as a starting mechanism. Not sure how common it was. Pete Yep, The common one many people see is the Field Marshall Diesel with the shotgun start option. It was a brass 12 gauge shell. Primer, powder and a wax seal disc. You opened the starting port, remove the old shell, then install the new one. Screw the top back on the port. Hit the striker with a hammer to fire the shell. Then stand back and watch the engine jump (single BIG piston diesel) the nose of the tractor. -- Steve W. Near Cooperstown, New York |
#15
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
On 21 Nov 2008 16:45:57 GMT, steamer wrote:
--Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. Wafting a oxy-act torch (with the act. valve open) in front of a reluctant engine is an old trick however, my experience is that it can result in broken rings as acetylene does not apparently have a very high octane rating. I have read a reference to R. Diesel's original engine, that ran on coal dust, saying something like "the second model was redesigned to run on coal oil in an effort to produce an engine that did not self destruct". Words to that effect, anyway. Cheers, Bruce (bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom) |
#16
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
"Jon Anderson" wrote in message ... Leo Lichtman wrote: What his grandfather didn't understand is that you don't want the charge in the cylinder to *explode*. You want it to burn as evenly as possible on the power stroke. That is what anti-knock is all about. And how do you -know- he didn't understand that? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I think it's a fair assumption, since the fuel he chose is highly explosive. Even gasoline can suffer pre-ignition (sometimes incorrectly called "detonation") which will damage the engine if allowed to continue. This is the reason for anti-knock additives, and in modern cars, automatic ignition retard. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ He got the engines to run, which meant the nitro was burning. He just couldn't control things well enough to do much beyond that. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Don't get me wrong. I'm not criticizing what he did. He was doing this at a time when a lot of people didn't know a lot of the things that we know now. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Admittedly, it was shade tree engineering. But I'd bet money if Great-Grandpa were around to be questioned, he would certainly know the difference between burning and exploding with respect to internal combustion engines. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ It's pointless to argue over a question that can't be settled. It still leaves me pondering about what he hoped to accomplish, since Model T's were running pretty well on gasoline. |
#17
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:10:07 -0600, Jon Elson
wrote: Pete Snell wrote: steamer wrote: --Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. I know there were a variety of tractors that used a 'shotgun' like shell as a starting mechanism. Not sure how common it was. That's a Kauffmann starter, also used in a lot of aircraft up to the F-4, at least. it was a pretty big shell (at least for an F-4) with a SLOW-burning powder. it would give about 15 seconds of continuous gas production. Jon There was also a "shotgun" starter that used a blank shell of some sort. I never saw one but I remember in tech school a reference to one being used by the Navy in some of their early recip engines. Apparenttly it went off with a bang as opposed to the Kaufman. Cheers, Bruce (bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom) |
#18
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:13:30 GMT, BobH
wrote: steamer wrote: --Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. Mr. Diesel (Rudolf I think) was killed trying to make an engine run on coal dust if I remember right. BobH Nope, he died during a cross channel ferry trip. Lost overboard an apparent suicide. Cheers, Bruce (bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom) |
#19
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
Leo Lichtman wrote:
It still leaves me pondering about what he hoped to accomplish, since Model T's were running pretty well on gasoline. That's one thing Dad never learned. I suspect it was just one of those "I wonder if this might work" things. Would never have been practical for general use. Imagine a collision resulting in both vehicles blown to bits or someone running into a 'nitro pump' and leveling the whole block.... What's funny about it to me is that Great Grandpa never transitioned well into automobiles. His first move in trying to get a car to stop was to yell "Whoa..." Jon |
#20
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
"Jon Anderson" wrote: (clip) Great Grandpa never transitioned well into automobiles. His first move in trying to get a car to stop was to yell "Whoa..." ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ :-) |
#21
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
On Nov 21, 11:45*am, steamer wrote:
* * * * --Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. -- * * * * "Steamboat Ed" Haas * * * * : *Never thought I'd live to see * * * * Hacking the Trailing Edge! *: *our "iron curtain" crumble... * * * * * * * * * * * * *www.nmpproducts.com * * * * * * * * * *---Decks a-wash in a sea of words--- Christian Huygens tried it in 1680 http://tinyurl.com/6llat4 This was probably the first try at internal combustion engines. |
#22
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
wrote in message ... On Nov 21, 11:45 am, steamer wrote: --Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. -- "Steamboat Ed" Haas : Never thought I'd live to see Hacking the Trailing Edge! : our "iron curtain" crumble... www.nmpproducts.com ---Decks a-wash in a sea of words--- speaking of gunpowder - I am told that one old farmer explained that he had learned that the secret to a long life was to sprinkle a bit of gunpowder on top of his eggs each morning - that it kept him energetic throughout the day. It must have worked, when he died of old age, he was 104. He is rememberd to this day for blasting a 10 foot hole in the side of the crematorium. ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
#23
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
On Nov 21, 2:10*pm, Jon Elson wrote:
Pete Snell wrote: steamer wrote: * * --Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. * I know there were a variety of tractors that used a 'shotgun' like shell as a starting mechanism. Not sure how common it was. That's a Kauffmann starter, also used in a lot of aircraft up to the F-4, at least. *it was a pretty big shell (at least for an F-4) with a SLOW-burning powder. *it would give about 15 seconds of continuous gas production. Jon Here’s a patent for a gunpowder-fuelled IC engine: http://www.google.com/patents?id=-Ws...1774#PP A2,M1 A 1965 movie with Jimmy Stewart called “Flight of the Phoenix” had an airplane with a Coffman starter: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fli...nix_(1965_film) (Remade in 2004 with Dennis Quade) Coffman engine starter: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffman_engine_starter |
#24
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
On 2008-11-22, Bill Noble wrote:
[ ... ] speaking of gunpowder - I am told that one old farmer explained that he had learned that the secret to a long life was to sprinkle a bit of gunpowder on top of his eggs each morning - that it kept him energetic throughout the day. It must have worked, when he died of old age, he was 104. He is rememberd to this day for blasting a 10 foot hole in the side of the crematorium. Neglecting the unliklyhood of it accumulating in the body enough for such an effect ... Was that supposed to be black powder, or smokeless? Smokeless would not blast unless it was enclosed in something more rigid than a stiff, and black -- well the carbon and sulfur would be harmless (and perhaps the carbon even beneficial for the digestion, but the third ingredient is saltpeter -- maybe he lived so long because he was not climbing into other's wives' bedrooms? :-) Of course -- with the smokeless -- he would be taking nitrates, which are supposed to be bad with Viagra -- but did he live long enough for Viagra to have been available anyway? :-) Enjoy, DoN. -- Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero --- |
#25
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
BobH wrote:
steamer wrote: --Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. Mr. Diesel (Rudolf I think) was killed trying to make an engine run on coal dust if I remember right. I remember reading somewhere that an engine was once made which actually ran (for a short time, at least) on coal dust. I don't remember anything more, except that I don't think Rudolf Diesel was mentioned. Best wishes, Chris |
#26
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
"Christopher Tidy" wrote in message ... BobH wrote: steamer wrote: --Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. Mr. Diesel (Rudolf I think) was killed trying to make an engine run on coal dust if I remember right. I remember reading somewhere that an engine was once made which actually ran (for a short time, at least) on coal dust. I don't remember anything more, except that I don't think Rudolf Diesel was mentioned. Diesel's first engine ran on coal dust, but it blew up, injuring him. There were later IC engines that ran on coal dust, but they had the obvious problem: the abrasive quality of the ash caused severe engine wear. -- Ed Huntress |
#27
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
Steamer inquired about running I.C. engines on acetylene gas and to this
I say: Google up "running I.C. engines on acetylene gas" 170,000 hits including A link to A 1980 article on running A car engine on acetylene gas from Mother Earth News. Many years ago I had some correspondence with A fellow who owned a company named Ace-Car-Go. He was experimenting with this subject and I had A Site-Feed Acetylene Generator at the time and I was thinking about converting A Dodge truck I had but than I figured it was impractical in Minnesota since it's below freezing 8 months A year. (At least it seems like it.) Speaking of acetylene generators: I can give someone A real deal on about A 100 pounds of carbide! Good Luck! H.R. |
#28
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
BobH sez: "Mr. Diesel (Rudolf I think) was killed trying to make an engine run on
coal dust if I remember right." Dr. Diesel was mysteriously lost overboard from a ship. Bob Swinney "BobH" wrote in message .. . steamer wrote: --Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. BobH |
#29
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
wrote (clip) Speaking of acetylene generators: I can give someone A real deal on about A 100 pounds of carbide! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I picked up an old carbide miner's lamp at a flea market, which I would like to fire up, but I can't find carbide for it. Would you sell me some--I really can't use 100 lb? |
#30
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
Robert Swinney wrote:
BobH sez: "Mr. Diesel (Rudolf I think) was killed trying to make an engine run on coal dust if I remember right." Dr. Diesel was mysteriously lost overboard from a ship. Rudy was *such* a ham. Nowadays they won't even let you bring your own generator aboard. --Winston |
#31
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
Leo Lichtman inquired about purchasing some carbide and to this I say:
Sure. It should work in A carbide lamp as it's in granulated form (some acetylene generators used A cake type product). The only problem is logistics as it would have to go by the post office or one of the delivery concerns and I don't know if they would have A problem with it. Not dangerous in any way as long as it's kept dry! Contact me at my email addy. It works. H.R. |
#32
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
wrote:
Speaking of acetylene generators: I can give someone A real deal on about A 100 pounds of carbide! --Yeah; I found a 2-lb can of the stuff when cleaning out the shed. That's what got me to thinking about the whole thing! :-) -- "Steamboat Ed" Haas : Never thought I'd live to see Hacking the Trailing Edge! : our "iron curtain" crumble... www.nmpproducts.com ---Decks a-wash in a sea of words--- |
#33
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:26:34 -0600, harleyron wrote:
Leo Lichtman inquired about purchasing some carbide and to this I say: Sure. It should work in A carbide lamp as it's in granulated form (some acetylene generators used A cake type product). The only problem is logistics as it would have to go by the post office or one of the delivery concerns and I don't know if they would have A problem with it. Not dangerous in any way as long as it's kept dry! Contact me at my email addy. It works. Looks like small amounts (less than 10 pounds) are shippable USPS marked ORM-D (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ORM-D) and "Consumer Commodity" according to "Mailing Hazardous Materials" in http://www.usps.com/mailerscompanion/janfeb2004/mc0204art5.htm UPS might have the same ORM-D rules as USPS but I didn't read their pages closely. UPS at least lists a contact to inquire about details, instead of just saying to contact local post office for details. There seem to be an awful lot of details that apply. Eg -- follow links to "Title 49 CFR 172.101 Table (List of Hazardous Materials)" in http://phmsa.dot.gov/hazmat/library and see several refs to calcium carbide. Then see http://pe.usps.com/text/pub52/pub52c3_019.htm where the following sections say that ORM-D flammable solids can be mailed by Surface Transportation: section 344 "Flammable Solids"; section 344.1.C: "Division 4.3, Dangerous When Wet. A material that, by contact with water, is likely to become spontaneously flammable or to give off flammable or toxic gas at a rate greater than 1 liter per kilogram of the material per hour"; section 344.2, Mailability; section 344.2.c, "Domestic Mail via Surface Transportation. A flammable solid that can qualify as an ORM€“D material is permitted." -- jiw |
#34
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:54:43 -0600, James Waldby wrote:
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:26:34 -0600, harleyron wrote: Leo Lichtman inquired about purchasing some carbide and to this I say: Sure. It should work in A carbide lamp as it's in granulated form (some acetylene generators used A cake type product). The only problem is logistics as it would have to go by the post office or one of the delivery concerns and I don't know if they would have A problem with it. Not dangerous in any way as long as it's kept dry! Contact me at my email addy. It works. Looks like small amounts (less than 10 pounds) are shippable USPS marked ORM-D (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ORM-D) and "Consumer Commodity" according to "Mailing Hazardous Materials" in http://www.usps.com/mailerscompanion/janfeb2004/mc0204art5.htm UPS might have the same ORM-D rules as USPS but I didn't read their pages closely. UPS at least lists a contact to inquire about details, instead of just saying to contact local post office for details. There seem to be an awful lot of details that apply. Eg -- follow links to "Title 49 CFR 172.101 Table (List of Hazardous Materials)" in http://phmsa.dot.gov/hazmat/library and see several refs to calcium carbide. Then see http://pe.usps.com/text/pub52/pub52c3_019.htm where the following sections say that ORM-D flammable solids can be mailed by Surface Transportation: section 344 "Flammable Solids"; section 344.1.C: "Division 4.3, Dangerous When Wet. A material that, by contact with water, is likely to become spontaneously flammable or to give off flammable or toxic gas at a rate greater than 1 liter per kilogram of the material per hour"; section 344.2, Mailability; section 344.2.c, "Domestic Mail via Surface Transportation. A flammable solid that can qualify as an ORM–D material is permitted." Id like to have 10 lbs myself, depending on price and cost of shipping. Ive a couple old carbide lamps and a carbide cannon. Gunner "They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist..." Maj. Gen. John Sedgewick, killed by a sniper in 1864 at the battle of Spotsylvania |
#35
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
steamer wrote in
: --Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. I know some early engines ran on coal dust, in a sort of diesel cycle. |
#36
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
Wes wrote:
Jon Elson wrote: That's a Kauffmann starter, also used in a lot of aircraft up to the F-4, at least. it was a pretty big shell (at least for an F-4) with a SLOW-burning powder. it would give about 15 seconds of continuous gas production. I think the USAF used them. The Marine F4J and F4S I worked on required compressed air to start. The Kauffman starter was an emergency use only sort of thing, for when an aircraft was stranded at a field which didn't have the appropriate huffer to start it. There was a time when almost every aircraft had specific starting gear, different from any onther aircraft, driving the logistics people near to distraction. Some were huffers of various pressure and mass flow. Some moved huge amounts of air at low pressure, others moved small volumes at high pressure. Other aircraft used electric starters of various currents (pretty much all of those were ~30 V.) All the F4 models use air start turbines, and needed 28 V DC to operate the fuel valves and ignition system. Jon |
#37
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
Bruce in Bangkok wrote:
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:10:07 -0600, Jon Elson wrote: Pete Snell wrote: steamer wrote: --Remember the time they tried to make an I.C. engine run on gunpowder? A bunch of us were talking about this the other day and we seemed to have vague memories of this actually working once, maybe in the 1800s. Anyone got a reference? Also looking for anything on engines running on acetylene. Fear not! Not going to put one in my car; just thinking of the pyrotechnic spinoff for a *very* remote location, heh. I know there were a variety of tractors that used a 'shotgun' like shell as a starting mechanism. Not sure how common it was. That's a Kauffmann starter, also used in a lot of aircraft up to the F-4, at least. it was a pretty big shell (at least for an F-4) with a SLOW-burning powder. it would give about 15 seconds of continuous gas production. Jon There was also a "shotgun" starter that used a blank shell of some sort. I never saw one but I remember in tech school a reference to one being used by the Navy in some of their early recip engines. Apparenttly it went off with a bang as opposed to the Kaufman. Yes, I think that is still a version of the Kauffman. The reciprocating engines needed a much shorter inpulse, mostly to get over the first compression stroke, so the time/energy of the cartridge was tuned to that engine's needs. Jon |
#38
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
On Nov 25, 1:01*pm, Jon Elson wrote:
Yes, I think that is still a version of the Kauffman. *The reciprocating engines needed a much shorter inpulse, mostly to get over the first compression stroke, so the time/energy of the cartridge was tuned to that engine's needs. Jon I've pushed a large radial prop or two and didn't notice much change in resistance from individual cylinders. |
#39
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
I dunno about Kauffmans, other than seeing something like it portrayed in
Flight Of The Phoenix, but some rotary wing birds (Sea Knight, etc) had a manually operated pump to charge an accumulator for a hydraulic starter motor. -- WB .......... metalworking projects www.kwagmire.com/metal_proj.html "Jon Elson" wrote in message ... The Kauffman starter was an emergency use only sort of thing, for when an aircraft was stranded at a field which didn't have the appropriate huffer to start it. There was a time when almost every aircraft had specific starting gear, different from any onther aircraft, driving the logistics people near to distraction. Some were huffers of various pressure and mass flow. Some moved huge amounts of air at low pressure, others moved small volumes at high pressure. Other aircraft used electric starters of various currents (pretty much all of those were ~30 V.) All the F4 models use air start turbines, and needed 28 V DC to operate the fuel valves and ignition system. Jon |
#40
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Mythbusters stuff
Some old time movies about WWI and around that time used Kauffmans.
Martin Wild_Bill wrote: I dunno about Kauffmans, other than seeing something like it portrayed in Flight Of The Phoenix, but some rotary wing birds (Sea Knight, etc) had a manually operated pump to charge an accumulator for a hydraulic starter motor. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mythbusters sighting | Metalworking | |||
FS in Alachua/Gainesville FL: huge volume shop stuff, tools supplieshardwares, other "guy stuff", 1, some, or all - PICKUP preferred | Woodworking | |||
stuff | Metalworking | |||
Mythbusters and the surplus store | Metalworking |