On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:10:00 +0100, the infamous Mark Rand
scrolled the following:

On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 23:28:24 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:


"Jon Anderson" wrote in message
...
Ed Huntress wrote:

It's easy to identify an elitist.
2. Their wine bottles have corks in them.

If I get 9 out of 10, I can still call myself an elitist??? Sonuffa gun!
Think I'll go book a stay at Martha's Vineyard.... G

You pass as long as you don't have the rings on your forehead. They're a
deal-breaker.

As for the Vineyard, the Shiverick Inn in Edgartown is supposed to be a nice
B&B for a reasonable price...


Am I still allowed to be elitist if most of my wine bottles _had_ corks in
them?

As long as your wines don't come in a box, Mark, you're OK.
http://www.myspaceantics.com/image-w...stume.jpg.html

Oops, that's not quite the one I wanted. He
http://mailorderbridevintage.com/hom...Wine%20box.jpg

--
Once we believe in ourselves, we can risk curiosity, wonder, spontaneous
delight, or any experience that reveals the human spirit.
--e e cummings

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 00:15:32 -0500, the infamous Don Foreman
scrolled the following:

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:26:38 -0500, Ignoramus11155
wrote:



I do not like McCain, a lot more than I like Obama.

I'm on the flipflop of that. Obama worries me. I don't scare easy.
That isn't because I'm brave or anything; it's because I've been
scared ****less enough times to be somewhat fatalistic. That said,
Obama worries me. McCain does too, but Obama worries me rather more.

Dittoes, Don.

--
Once we believe in ourselves, we can risk curiosity, wonder, spontaneous
delight, or any experience that reveals the human spirit.
--e e cummings

Gunner Asch wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 06:05:31 -0700, Larry Jaques
wrote:


On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 00:15:32 -0500, the infamous Don Foreman
scrolled the following:


On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:26:38 -0500, Ignoramus11155
wrote:



I do not like McCain, a lot more than I like Obama.

I'm on the flipflop of that. Obama worries me. I don't scare easy.
That isn't because I'm brave or anything; it's because I've been
scared ****less enough times to be somewhat fatalistic. That said,
Obama worries me. McCain does too, but Obama worries me rather more.

Dittoes, Don.



Dittos, Gunner

"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich



I'm not voting for McCain.

But I'll probably vote against Obama.


--

Richard

(remove the X to email)

"cavelamb himself" wrote in message
m...
Gunner Asch wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 06:05:31 -0700, Larry Jaques
wrote:


On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 00:15:32 -0500, the infamous Don Foreman
scrolled the following:


On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:26:38 -0500, Ignoramus11155
wrote:



I do not like McCain, a lot more than I like Obama.

I'm on the flipflop of that. Obama worries me. I don't scare easy.
That isn't because I'm brave or anything; it's because I've been
scared ****less enough times to be somewhat fatalistic. That said,
Obama worries me. McCain does too, but Obama worries me rather more.

Dittoes, Don.



Dittos, Gunner

"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich



I'm not voting for McCain.

But I'll probably vote against Obama.


--

Richard

Ka-ching! Another voter decides to opt out of democracy and to let somebody
else decide.

You, Don and Larry may find Kristof's column today enlightening:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/op...hp&oref=slogin

Gunner might as well skip it. d8-).

--
Ed Huntress

I missed the Staff meeting, but the Memos showed that Gunner Asch
wrote on Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:49:17 -0700
in rec.crafts.metalworking :
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 06:05:31 -0700, Larry Jaques
wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 00:15:32 -0500, the infamous Don Foreman
scrolled the following:

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:26:38 -0500, Ignoramus11155
wrote:



I do not like McCain, a lot more than I like Obama.

I'm on the flipflop of that. Obama worries me. I don't scare easy.
That isn't because I'm brave or anything; it's because I've been
scared ****less enough times to be somewhat fatalistic. That said,
Obama worries me. McCain does too, but Obama worries me rather more.

Dittoes, Don.


Dittos, Gunner

"I'd like to introduce the candidates. On my left is John McCain.
And on my far left, is Barak Obama."

Put me down as a supporter of Sarah Palin for Pres in 2012. What
the hey, having the left pitch hissy fits till their little heads
explode, just because Palin's a better man than they are, has it's own
charm too.

pyotr
--
pyotr filipivich
"I had just been through hell and must have looked like death warmed
over walking into the saloon, because when I asked the bartender
whether they served zombies he said, ‘Sure, what'll you have?'"
from I Hear America Swinging by Peter DeVries

"pyotr filipivich" wrote in message
...
I missed the Staff meeting, but the Memos showed that Gunner Asch
wrote on Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:49:17 -0700
in rec.crafts.metalworking :
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 06:05:31 -0700, Larry Jaques
wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 00:15:32 -0500, the infamous Don Foreman
scrolled the following:

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:26:38 -0500, Ignoramus11155
wrote:



I do not like McCain, a lot more than I like Obama.

I'm on the flipflop of that. Obama worries me. I don't scare easy.
That isn't because I'm brave or anything; it's because I've been
scared ****less enough times to be somewhat fatalistic. That said,
Obama worries me. McCain does too, but Obama worries me rather more.

Dittoes, Don.


Dittos, Gunner

"I'd like to introduce the candidates. On my left is John McCain.
And on my far left, is Barak Obama."

Put me down as a supporter of Sarah Palin for Pres in 2012. What
the hey, having the left pitch hissy fits till their little heads
explode, just because Palin's a better man than they are, has it's own
charm too.

As her alter ego said on SNL last week, the press should grow a pair. And if
they can't, she'll loan them hers. She's just a sweet transvestite:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hcpvx2EVCpU

She made that "husband" of hers him a man, all by herself. She can do it for
the whole country, if we only give her a chance:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8yWv...eature=related

--
Ed Huntress

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:33:22 -0400, the infamous "Ed Huntress"
scrolled the following:


"cavelamb himself" wrote in message
om...
Gunner Asch wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 06:05:31 -0700, Larry Jaques
wrote:


On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 00:15:32 -0500, the infamous Don Foreman
scrolled the following:


On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:26:38 -0500, Ignoramus11155
wrote:



I do not like McCain, a lot more than I like Obama.

I'm on the flipflop of that. Obama worries me. I don't scare easy.
That isn't because I'm brave or anything; it's because I've been
scared ****less enough times to be somewhat fatalistic. That said,
Obama worries me. McCain does too, but Obama worries me rather more.

Dittoes, Don.



Dittos, Gunner

"Obama, raises taxes and kills babies. Sarah Palin - raises babies
and kills taxes." Pyotr Flipivich



I'm not voting for McCain.

But I'll probably vote against Obama.

Ka-ching! Another voter decides to opt out of democracy and to let somebody
else decide.

You, Don and Larry may find Kristof's column today enlightening:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/op...hp&oref=slogin

Love those t-shirts! bseg

Obama more church-active than McCain - scary.

We don't have a melting pot here any more. It's an uncooked
multicultural stew which is turning rancid on us.

Politics in this country is all about reinforcing those ugly
prejudices. It gets worse every year, as they hire more and more
costly advertisers who will stoop to anything, and then some, to get
their man elected.


I hate socialism, but I'm for a socialized funding system for our
election. All monies for each position are dumped into a single
account until 6 weeks before the election. At that time, all qualified
(according to electoral regs) candidates share an equal portion of
that money and can do with it as they will, as long as it's all either
spent--on this particular election alone--or returned to the coffers
for the next election. It can't be given away, shared with other
candidates, or kept. (War chests breed more crime and help to elect
less qualified people.)

This would limit the time these arseholes (I love politicians, don't
you?) could attempt to bribe us or continually assault us with their
bullsh*t (like these last 4 fracking years) and, hopefully, reduce
bribes _to_ them. Brits and Canucks seem to do it right.

P.S: My vote is still going to the lesser of two weevils, McCain. And
my local Libertarians may get the nod when they step up.

================================================== ==========
Help Save the Endangered Plumb Bobs From Becoming Extinct!

"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:33:22 -0400, the infamous "Ed Huntress"
scrolled the following:

snip


You, Don and Larry may find Kristof's column today enlightening:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/op...hp&oref=slogin

Love those t-shirts! bseg

Obama more church-active than McCain - scary.

We don't have a melting pot here any more. It's an uncooked
multicultural stew which is turning rancid on us.

It's the combination of burritos, beef jerky, and pepperoni pizza.. Eat them
together, wait an hour, and you have a fuel-air bomb.


Politics in this country is all about reinforcing those ugly
prejudices. It gets worse every year, as they hire more and more
costly advertisers who will stoop to anything, and then some, to get
their man elected.

The candidates don't help much. Bomb-bomb-bomb, bomb-bomb Iran...


I hate socialism, but I'm for a socialized funding system for our
election.

That must be good regulation...

All monies for each position are dumped into a single
account until 6 weeks before the election. At that time, all qualified
(according to electoral regs) candidates share an equal portion of
that money and can do with it as they will, as long as it's all either
spent--on this particular election alone--or returned to the coffers
for the next election. It can't be given away, shared with other
candidates, or kept. (War chests breed more crime and help to elect
less qualified people.)

That would be bad regulation.


This would limit the time these arseholes (I love politicians, don't
you?) could attempt to bribe us or continually assault us with their
bullsh*t (like these last 4 fracking years) and, hopefully, reduce
bribes _to_ them. Brits and Canucks seem to do it right.

Who taught your civics class? Ralph Nader?


P.S: My vote is still going to the lesser of two weevils, McCain. And
my local Libertarians may get the nod when they step up.

Right. Vote Libertarian. Uphold your principles. Get out the vote -- make
sure all your friends and neighbors to vote Libertarian, too. It's your
civic duty. d8-)

--
Ed Huntress

On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:23:17 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:


As her alter ego said on SNL last week, the press should grow a pair. And if
they can't, she'll loan them hers.

My wife's reaction the first time she saw Sarah was, "Tina Fey's gonna
have a field day with this."

--
Ned Simmons

"Ned Simmons" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:23:17 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:


As her alter ego said on SNL last week, the press should grow a pair. And
if
they can't, she'll loan them hers.

My wife's reaction the first time she saw Sarah was, "Tina Fey's gonna
have a field day with this."

Your wife is a woman of considerable insight. Mine just said, "She's in over
her head."

--
Ed Huntress

On 2008-09-22, Ed Huntress wrote:

"Ned Simmons" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:23:17 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:


As her alter ego said on SNL last week, the press should grow a pair. And
if
they can't, she'll loan them hers.

My wife's reaction the first time she saw Sarah was, "Tina Fey's gonna
have a field day with this."

Your wife is a woman of considerable insight. Mine just said, "She's in over
her head."

I want to watch her debate with Joe Biden. The debates should show
that, if it is true. That she does not want to participate in anything
un-scripted, suggests that she has something that she does not want to
show.

--
Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention
to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating
from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by
more readers you will need to find a different means of
posting on Usenet.
http://improve-usenet.org/

"Ignoramus15296" wrote in message
...
On 2008-09-22, Ed Huntress wrote:

"Ned Simmons" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:23:17 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:


As her alter ego said on SNL last week, the press should grow a pair.
And
if
they can't, she'll loan them hers.

My wife's reaction the first time she saw Sarah was, "Tina Fey's gonna
have a field day with this."

Your wife is a woman of considerable insight. Mine just said, "She's in
over
her head."

I want to watch her debate with Joe Biden. The debates should show
that, if it is true. That she does not want to participate in anything
un-scripted, suggests that she has something that she does not want to
show.

Yeah, I want to see that, too. But the RNC set the rules so that she won't
have to confront Biden directly. They've been surprisingly open about this.
They basically acknowledge that she'd get creamed if she had to go off the
script.

Expect a string of well-scripted, non-responsive, unspecific remarks from
her.

--
Ed Huntress

On 2008-09-22, Ed Huntress wrote:

"Ignoramus15296" wrote in message
...
On 2008-09-22, Ed Huntress wrote:

"Ned Simmons" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:23:17 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:


As her alter ego said on SNL last week, the press should grow a pair.
And
if
they can't, she'll loan them hers.

My wife's reaction the first time she saw Sarah was, "Tina Fey's gonna
have a field day with this."

Your wife is a woman of considerable insight. Mine just said, "She's in
over
her head."

I want to watch her debate with Joe Biden. The debates should show
that, if it is true. That she does not want to participate in anything
un-scripted, suggests that she has something that she does not want to
show.

Yeah, I want to see that, too. But the RNC set the rules so that she won't
have to confront Biden directly. They've been surprisingly open about this.
They basically acknowledge that she'd get creamed if she had to go off the
script.

Expect a string of well-scripted, non-responsive, unspecific remarks from
her.

So, what are the rules? Would Sarah have to answer any debate points
made by Joe Biden? Or will she know the question in advance and read
answers off a teleprompter, which would be unlikely?

--
Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention
to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating
from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by
more readers you will need to find a different means of
posting on Usenet.
http://improve-usenet.org/

"Ignoramus15296" wrote in message
...
On 2008-09-22, Ed Huntress wrote:

"Ignoramus15296" wrote in message
...
On 2008-09-22, Ed Huntress wrote:

"Ned Simmons" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:23:17 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:


As her alter ego said on SNL last week, the press should grow a pair.
And
if
they can't, she'll loan them hers.

My wife's reaction the first time she saw Sarah was, "Tina Fey's gonna
have a field day with this."

Your wife is a woman of considerable insight. Mine just said, "She's in
over
her head."

I want to watch her debate with Joe Biden. The debates should show
that, if it is true. That she does not want to participate in anything
un-scripted, suggests that she has something that she does not want to
show.

Yeah, I want to see that, too. But the RNC set the rules so that she
won't
have to confront Biden directly. They've been surprisingly open about
this.
They basically acknowledge that she'd get creamed if she had to go off
the
script.

Expect a string of well-scripted, non-responsive, unspecific remarks from
her.

So, what are the rules? Would Sarah have to answer any debate points
made by Joe Biden? Or will she know the question in advance and read
answers off a teleprompter, which would be unlikely?

Here's an article that explains some of it:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/us...ru les&st=cse

--
Ed Huntress

On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:23:17 -0400, the infamous "Ed Huntress"
scrolled the following:


"pyotr filipivich" wrote in message
.. .
I missed the Staff meeting, but the Memos showed that Gunner Asch
wrote on Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:49:17 -0700
in rec.crafts.metalworking :
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 06:05:31 -0700, Larry Jaques
wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 00:15:32 -0500, the infamous Don Foreman
scrolled the following:

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:26:38 -0500, Ignoramus11155
wrote:



I do not like McCain, a lot more than I like Obama.

I'm on the flipflop of that. Obama worries me. I don't scare easy.
That isn't because I'm brave or anything; it's because I've been
scared ****less enough times to be somewhat fatalistic. That said,
Obama worries me. McCain does too, but Obama worries me rather more.

Dittoes, Don.


Dittos, Gunner

"I'd like to introduce the candidates. On my left is John McCain.
And on my far left, is Barak Obama."

Put me down as a supporter of Sarah Palin for Pres in 2012. What
the hey, having the left pitch hissy fits till their little heads
explode, just because Palin's a better man than they are, has it's own
charm too.

As her alter ego said on SNL last week, the press should grow a pair. And if
they can't, she'll loan them hers. She's just a sweet transvestite:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hcpvx2EVCpU

She made that "husband" of hers him a man, all by herself. She can do it for
the whole country, if we only give her a chance:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8yWv...eature=related

Using Rocky Horror transvestites to sell Obama to the masses. What'll
you libbies think of next, "I'm a Republican" Ed? chortle

================================================== ==========
Help Save the Endangered Plumb Bobs From Becoming Extinct!

Ed Huntress wrote:
"cavelamb himself" wrote in message

I'm not voting for McCain.

But I'll probably vote against Obama.


--

Richard


Ka-ching! Another voter decides to opt out of democracy and to let somebody
else decide.

You, Don and Larry may find Kristof's column today enlightening:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/op...hp&oref=slogin

Gunner might as well skip it. d8-).

--
Ed Huntress


I read what you offered up here, Ed.
But you couldn't be more wrong.


I don't believe EITHER of these mutts are spiritual people.
Christian or Musulm.


I don't think either of them will be able to "solve" our problems.
Financial or cultural.


But one of these guys is going to be the next President of the
United States - like it or not.


I simply have more in common with John McCain than Obama.



--

Richard

(remove the X to email)

"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:23:17 -0400, the infamous "Ed Huntress"
scrolled the following:


"pyotr filipivich" wrote in message
. ..
I missed the Staff meeting, but the Memos showed that Gunner Asch
wrote on Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:49:17 -0700
in rec.crafts.metalworking :
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 06:05:31 -0700, Larry Jaques
wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 00:15:32 -0500, the infamous Don Foreman
scrolled the following:

On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:26:38 -0500, Ignoramus11155
wrote:



I do not like McCain, a lot more than I like Obama.

I'm on the flipflop of that. Obama worries me. I don't scare easy.
That isn't because I'm brave or anything; it's because I've been
scared ****less enough times to be somewhat fatalistic. That said,
Obama worries me. McCain does too, but Obama worries me rather more.

Dittoes, Don.


Dittos, Gunner

"I'd like to introduce the candidates. On my left is John McCain.
And on my far left, is Barak Obama."

Put me down as a supporter of Sarah Palin for Pres in 2012. What
the hey, having the left pitch hissy fits till their little heads
explode, just because Palin's a better man than they are, has it's own
charm too.

As her alter ego said on SNL last week, the press should grow a pair. And
if
they can't, she'll loan them hers. She's just a sweet transvestite:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hcpvx2EVCpU

She made that "husband" of hers him a man, all by herself. She can do it
for
the whole country, if we only give her a chance:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8yWv...eature=related

Using Rocky Horror transvestites to sell Obama to the masses. What'll
you libbies think of next, "I'm a Republican" Ed? chortle

It was just too perfect. After listening to Tina Fey's routine the other
night, and the thought of Sarah with testicles, all I could think of was
"Rocky Horror." (That could be a good label for the past eight years, as a
matter of fact.) Several comments here have reinforced it; the righties seem
to relish the degree to which she's more of a man rather than a woman. That
sure sounds transexual to me...

Anyway, I haven't seen it for 30 years to I looked to see if "Sweet
Transvestite" was on YouTube. Watching it again was even better than the
first time. I nearly fell off my chair picturing the whole thing occurring
in the Alaska Governor's Mansion.

Of course it's a joke, but I'll tell you this: If I ever get a flat tire
while driving by the governor's residence in Alaska, I'm not knocking on the
door.

--
Ed Huntress

"cavelamb himself" wrote in message
m...
Ed Huntress wrote:
"cavelamb himself" wrote in message
I'm not voting for McCain.

But I'll probably vote against Obama.


--

Richard


Ka-ching! Another voter decides to opt out of democracy and to let
somebody else decide.

You, Don and Larry may find Kristof's column today enlightening:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/op...hp&oref=slogin

Gunner might as well skip it. d8-).

--
Ed Huntress


I read what you offered up here, Ed.
But you couldn't be more wrong.

About what?


I don't believe EITHER of these mutts are spiritual people.
Christian or Musulm.

Neither do I. That's one thing I like about both of them. I want a president
with both feet on the ground, and nowhere else. If I want a spiritual
person, I'll vote for Madam Zola.

I don't think either of them will be able to "solve" our problems.
Financial or cultural.

Neither do I. Neither would anyone solve our problems. We aren't voting for
a magician; we're voting for a president.


But one of these guys is going to be the next President of the
United States - like it or not.

I won't cry over it either way.


I simply have more in common with John McCain than Obama.

So do I. That's a major negative for McCain. g

BTW, I think he and I share the same hair stylist.

--
Ed Huntress

Ed Huntress wrote:
"cavelamb himself" wrote in message
m...

Ed Huntress wrote:

"cavelamb himself" wrote in message

I'm not voting for McCain.

But I'll probably vote against Obama.


--

Richard


Ka-ching! Another voter decides to opt out of democracy and to let
somebody else decide.

You, Don and Larry may find Kristof's column today enlightening:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/op...hp&oref=slogin

Gunner might as well skip it. d8-).

--
Ed Huntress


I read what you offered up here, Ed.
But you couldn't be more wrong.


About what?


I don't believe EITHER of these mutts are spiritual people.
Christian or Musulm.


Neither do I. That's one thing I like about both of them. I want a president
with both feet on the ground, and nowhere else. If I want a spiritual
person, I'll vote for Madam Zola.


I don't think either of them will be able to "solve" our problems.
Financial or cultural.


Neither do I. Neither would anyone solve our problems. We aren't voting for
a magician; we're voting for a president.


But one of these guys is going to be the next President of the
United States - like it or not.


I won't cry over it either way.


I simply have more in common with John McCain than Obama.


So do I. That's a major negative for McCain. g

BTW, I think he and I share the same hair stylist.


LOL! Ok, Ed, ya got me there!


--

Richard

(remove the X to email)

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:33:22 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:



Ka-ching! Another voter decides to opt out of democracy and to let somebody
else decide.

You, Don and Larry may find Kristof's column today enlightening:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/op...hp&oref=slogin

Gunner might as well skip it. d8-).

No news there, Ed.

"Don Foreman" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:33:22 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:



Ka-ching! Another voter decides to opt out of democracy and to let
somebody
else decide.

You, Don and Larry may find Kristof's column today enlightening:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/op...hp&oref=slogin

Gunner might as well skip it. d8-).

No news there, Ed.

Well, good. You've been following closely then. If you saw the dustups
yesterday, you see that Schmidt and the rest of Sons of the Swiftie Slimers
are in a snit and they're trying to push back on the New York Times. But
this time the Times won't be pushed. They caught hell last time for not
calling the slimers on their game, but Heller, the Times' chief editor,
apparently resolved not to let it happen again.

Schmidt is looking for an opening to "define their own reality," as Karl
Rove once put it, and he's finding it a lot harder to do this time around.

--
Ed Huntress

On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:22:57 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:


"cavelamb himself" wrote in message


I don't believe EITHER of these mutts are spiritual people.
Christian or Musulm.

Neither do I. That's one thing I like about both of them. I want a president
with both feet on the ground, and nowhere else. If I want a spiritual
person, I'll vote for Madam Zola.


A god-botherer got you into Iraq again. 'Nuff said.


Mark Rand
RTFM

Mark Rand wrote:

On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:22:57 -0400, "Ed Huntress"
wrote:


"cavelamb himself" wrote in message


I don't believe EITHER of these mutts are spiritual people.
Christian or Musulm.

Neither do I. That's one thing I like about both of them. I want a president
with both feet on the ground, and nowhere else. If I want a spiritual
person, I'll vote for Madam Zola.



A god-botherer got you into Iraq again. 'Nuff said.


Mark Rand
RTFM

Don't be rediculous, Mark.




--

Richard

(remove the X to email)