http://www.reuters.com/article/topNe...Name=topNew s

ST. PAUL (Reuters) - The 17-year-old daughter of Republican vice
presidential candidate Sarah Palin is pregnant, Palin said on Monday
in an announcement intended to knock down rumors by liberal bloggers
that Palin faked her own pregnancy to cover up for her child.

--
Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention
to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating
from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by
more readers you will need to find a different means of
posting on Usenet.
http://improve-usenet.org/

"Ignoramus32074" wrote in message
news
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNe...Name=topNew s

ST. PAUL (Reuters) - The 17-year-old daughter of Republican vice
presidential candidate Sarah Palin is pregnant, Palin said on Monday
in an announcement intended to knock down rumors by liberal bloggers
that Palin faked her own pregnancy to cover up for her child.

Explaining that it won't affect the fundamentalist vote, Mathew Staver, dean
of Liberty University School of Law, said: ''We're all sinners.''

And how. But some do it religiously. d8-)

--
Ed Huntress

"Ignoramus32074" wrote in message
news
No metal content Iggy.

Vaughn

On 2008-09-01, Ed Huntress wrote:

"Ignoramus32074" wrote in message
news
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNe...Name=topNew s

ST. PAUL (Reuters) - The 17-year-old daughter of Republican vice
presidential candidate Sarah Palin is pregnant, Palin said on Monday
in an announcement intended to knock down rumors by liberal bloggers
that Palin faked her own pregnancy to cover up for her child.

Explaining that it won't affect the fundamentalist vote, Mathew Staver, dean
of Liberty University School of Law, said: ''We're all sinners.''

And how. But some do it religiously. d8-)

Inquiring minds want to know whether Sarah told McCain about this when
her candidacy was discussed.

I personally do not expect this to affect her ability to be a vice
president, five or six children does not make a lot of difference, it
is still a lot, but she thinks that she can manage.

I know that I could not be a vice president even with my two
children. But I am not running for one.

--
Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention
to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating
from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by
more readers you will need to find a different means of
posting on Usenet.
http://improve-usenet.org/

Ignoramus32074 wrote:

Inquiring minds want to know whether Sarah told McCain about this when
her candidacy was discussed.


According to the noon TV news, he knew What difference does it
make, except to people with their head too far up Obama's ass? Is she
the only underage girl in the US to make that mistake?


I personally do not expect this to affect her ability to be a vice
president, five or six children does not make a lot of difference, it
is still a lot, but she thinks that she can manage.


The news also stated that she was going to keep the child, and marry
its dad.


I know that I could not be a vice president even with my two
children. But I am not running for one.


--
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html

aioe.org, Goggle Groups, and Web TV users must request to be white
listed, or I will not see your messages.

If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm


There are two kinds of people on this earth:
The crazy, and the insane.
The first sign of insanity is denying that you're crazy.

"Ed Huntress" wrote:

Explaining that it won't affect the fundamentalist vote, Mathew Staver, dean
of Liberty University School of Law, said: ''We're all sinners.''

Well that is true. I know a bunch of very religous types that I can point out their sins
to them and they would have to admit them.

We are all sinners or if you prefer, imperfect beings.

I thought you were traveling?

Wes

ST. PAUL (Reuters) - The 17-year-old daughter of Republican vice
presidential candidate Sarah Palin is pregnant, Palin said on Monday
in an announcement intended to knock down rumors by liberal bloggers
that Palin faked her own pregnancy to cover up for her child.


Teenage pregnancy; another example of the family values the republicans are
always talking about? Oh sorry, I mean for other folks. Republicans have a
different set of values for themselves. You can ask "wide stance" Larry
Craig about that.

Hawke

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Ignoramus32074 wrote:

Inquiring minds want to know whether Sarah told McCain about this when
her candidacy was discussed.



According to the noon TV news, he knew What difference does it
make, except to people with their head too far up Obama's ass? Is she
the only underage girl in the US to make that mistake?



I personally do not expect this to affect her ability to be a vice
president, five or six children does not make a lot of difference, it
is still a lot, but she thinks that she can manage.



The news also stated that she was going to keep the child, and marry
its dad.




At least she knows who the dad is.


John

On 2008-09-01, Hawke wrote:
ST. PAUL (Reuters) - The 17-year-old daughter of Republican vice
presidential candidate Sarah Palin is pregnant, Palin said on Monday
in an announcement intended to knock down rumors by liberal bloggers
that Palin faked her own pregnancy to cover up for her child.


Teenage pregnancy; another example of the family values the republicans are
always talking about? Oh sorry, I mean for other folks. Republicans have a
different set of values for themselves. You can ask "wide stance" Larry
Craig about that.

I have to disagree. The one good thing about Larry Craig is that
he will not make any girls pregnant.

Now, the point that we are all sinners, is well taken, but sinners who
use condoms, do not get pregnant. A good mother should explain that to her
teenage daughters, besides other admonitions.

i
father of two unplanned children

--
Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention
to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating
from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by
more readers you will need to find a different means of
posting on Usenet.
http://improve-usenet.org/

"Ignoramus32074" wrote:

[snip political BS]

Don't you know of any other groups which would be more appropriate to fill
with your political gossip?

Jon

"Wes" wrote in message
news
"Ed Huntress" wrote:

Explaining that it won't affect the fundamentalist vote, Mathew Staver,
dean
of Liberty University School of Law, said: ''We're all sinners.''

Well that is true. I know a bunch of very religous types that I can point
out their sins
to them and they would have to admit them.

We are all sinners or if you prefer, imperfect beings.

I thought you were traveling?

Wes

Not yet. We're running a day late, because they screwed up our trailer
reservation and we had to wait. Fortunately, it doesn't really matter. We
leave tomorrow morning.

--
Ed Huntress

On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 15:25:02 -0700, "Jon Danniken"
wrote:

"Ignoramus32074" wrote:

[snip political BS]

Don't you know of any other groups which would be more appropriate to fill
with your political gossip?

Jon



Heyyyy Jonnn,

Wayyyy tooooo gooooo!!!!!!!! Don't take shots at Gunner or Cliff for
over half (I'm being conservative here) their posts being
non-metallica, but let's get Iggy on a point of honour!! Way to go!!!

Brian Lawson,
Bothwell, Ontario.

Jon Danniken wrote:
"Ignoramus32074" wrote:

[snip political BS]

Don't you know of any other groups which would be more appropriate to fill
with your political gossip?

Jon


Hear, Hear!

--


Ron Thompson
Riding my '07 XL883C Sportster
On the Beautiful Florida Space Coast,
right beside the Kennedy Space Center,
USA

http://www.plansandprojects.com
My hobby pages are he
http://www.plansandprojects.com/My%20Machines/

Visit the castinghobby FAQ:
http://castinghobbyfaq.bareboogerhost.com/

Add yourself to the member map he
http://www.frappr.com/castinghobby

Want to have some fun? The next time you're at McDonald's, wait until
the kid has your change ready and then say "Wait, I've got the two cents."
-Ron Thompson

"Brian Lawson" wrote:
"Jon Danniken" wrote:

"Ignoramus32074" wrote:

[snip political BS]

Don't you know of any other groups which would be more appropriate to fill
with your political gossip?


Heyyyy Jonnn,

Wayyyy tooooo gooooo!!!!!!!! Don't take shots at Gunner or Cliff for
over half (I'm being conservative here) their posts being
non-metallica, but let's get Iggy on a point of honour!! Way to go!!!

I ****canned Cliff years ago, as well as Gunner more recently, due to their
habit of spewing political BS in this group.

Actually, one of Gunner's accounts has not been ****canned, because he tends
to restrict that particular account to metal topics, from which I have
learned much, and is the reason I come here.

Got any other observations you would like to share?

Look, everyone might make a little OT comment now and again, but I posted
the original reply after Iggy decided to start a number seperate political
threads, all on the same ****ing topic (McCain's VP) and all on the same
****ing day . That's just being selfish, and does nothing but discourage
otherwise useful posters from bothering to contribute here.

Jon

On 2008-09-02, Jon Danniken wrote:
Look, everyone might make a little OT comment now and again, but I posted
the original reply after Iggy decided to start a number seperate political
threads, all on the same ****ing topic (McCain's VP) and all on the same
****ing day . That's just being selfish, and does nothing but discourage
otherwise useful posters from bothering to contribute here.

I like to be bad once in a while, but generally try to post more about
metal than non-metal. Say, what do you think is the "real" resolution
of a mill with a glass scale DRO?

--
Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention
to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating
from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by
more readers you will need to find a different means of
posting on Usenet.
http://improve-usenet.org/

"Ignoramus32074" wrote:
Jon Danniken wrote:
Look, everyone might make a little OT comment now and again, but I posted
the original reply after Iggy decided to start a number seperate
political
threads, all on the same ****ing topic (McCain's VP) and all on the same
****ing day . That's just being selfish, and does nothing but discourage
otherwise useful posters from bothering to contribute here.

I like to be bad once in a while, but generally try to post more about
metal than non-metal. Say, what do you think is the "real" resolution
of a mill with a glass scale DRO?

Well, that's a bit too advanced a topic for me right now, although it is one
I will likey entertain once I get to the point of getting my own mill. For
now I have other issues to work out, the (currently) most pressing of which
is how to rough in an overhead door. I think I may have had a breakthrough
last night, where I came across the simple observation that the rough width
is exatly the same width of the door itself. It seems so simple now, but
that's how things usually work themselves out.

Jon

"Jon Danniken" wrote
For
now I have other issues to work out, the (currently) most pressing of
which
is how to rough in an overhead door. I think I may have had a
breakthrough
last night, where I came across the simple observation that the rough
width
is exatly the same width of the door itself. It seems so simple now, but
that's how things usually work themselves out.

Wrong. The rough -in dimension is width of door + 1-1/2 to 1-3/4" The jambs
will shrink the opening to door width and the stops and wx-strip will bear
against the door. The height of the rough opening is + 7/8" for obvious
reasons. When you install the door raise the verticle tracks 3/4" off the
floor. It keeps the tracks out of the water on the floor and gives you a
better chance of the door raising out of the opening. Good luck and have
fun.
Tom

"Tom Wait" wrote:
"Jon Danniken" wrote
For
now I have other issues to work out, the (currently) most pressing of
which
is how to rough in an overhead door. I think I may have had a
breakthrough
last night, where I came across the simple observation that the rough
width
is exatly the same width of the door itself. It seems so simple now, but
that's how things usually work themselves out.

Wrong. The rough -in dimension is width of door + 1-1/2 to 1-3/4" The
jambs
will shrink the opening to door width and the stops and wx-strip will bear
against the door. The height of the rough opening is + 7/8" for obvious
reasons. When you install the door raise the verticle tracks 3/4" off the
floor. It keeps the tracks out of the water on the floor and gives you a
better chance of the door raising out of the opening. Good luck and have
fun.

Thanks Tom, I hadn't accounted for the stripping and shrinkage. Much
appreciated!

Jon

On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:30:06 -0400, john
wrote:



Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Ignoramus32074 wrote:

Inquiring minds want to know whether Sarah told McCain about this when
her candidacy was discussed.



According to the noon TV news, he knew What difference does it
make, except to people with their head too far up Obama's ass? Is she
the only underage girl in the US to make that mistake?



I personally do not expect this to affect her ability to be a vice
president, five or six children does not make a lot of difference, it
is still a lot, but she thinks that she can manage.



The news also stated that she was going to keep the child, and marry
its dad.




At least she knows who the dad is.


John


Maybe Jesse Jackson will bring his pregant mistress along and counsel
her?


"Confiscating wealth from those who have earned it, inherited it,
or got lucky is never going to help 'the poor.' Poverty isn't
caused by some people having more money than others, just as obesity
isn't caused by McDonald's serving super-sized orders of French fries
Poverty, like obesity, is caused by the life choices that dictate
results." - John Tucci,

"Jon Danniken" wrote in message
...
"Tom Wait" wrote:
"Jon Danniken" wrote
For
now I have other issues to work out, the (currently) most pressing of
which
is how to rough in an overhead door. I think I may have had a
breakthrough
last night, where I came across the simple observation that the rough
width
is exatly the same width of the door itself. It seems so simple now,
but
that's how things usually work themselves out.

Wrong. The rough -in dimension is width of door + 1-1/2 to 1-3/4" The
jambs
will shrink the opening to door width and the stops and wx-strip will
bear
against the door. The height of the rough opening is + 7/8" for obvious
reasons. When you install the door raise the verticle tracks 3/4" off
the
floor. It keeps the tracks out of the water on the floor and gives you a
better chance of the door raising out of the opening. Good luck and have
fun.

Thanks Tom, I hadn't accounted for the stripping and shrinkage. Much
appreciated!

Jon


Glad to help.
Shrinkage??
Tom

"Ignoramus32074" wrote in message
...
On 2008-09-01, Hawke wrote:
ST. PAUL (Reuters) - The 17-year-old daughter of Republican vice
presidential candidate Sarah Palin is pregnant, Palin said on Monday
in an announcement intended to knock down rumors by liberal bloggers
that Palin faked her own pregnancy to cover up for her child.


Teenage pregnancy; another example of the family values the republicans
are
always talking about? Oh sorry, I mean for other folks. Republicans have
a
different set of values for themselves. You can ask "wide stance" Larry
Craig about that.

I have to disagree. The one good thing about Larry Craig is that
he will not make any girls pregnant.

Now, the point that we are all sinners, is well taken, but sinners who
use condoms, do not get pregnant. A good mother should explain that to her
teenage daughters, besides other admonitions.

i
father of two unplanned children


Now we see the down side of home schooling. No class on how to put a condom
on a cucumber is taught in home school. You wouldn't think that would matter
much, but the utility of a skill like that has now become very apparent. I
wonder if the girl was playing hooky the day her Mom was supposed to teach
her about abstinence? Obviously, she didn't get that lesson.

Hawke

"Ignoramus32074" wrote in message
...
On 2008-09-02, Jon Danniken wrote:
Look, everyone might make a little OT comment now and again, but I
posted
the original reply after Iggy decided to start a number seperate
political
threads, all on the same ****ing topic (McCain's VP) and all on the same
****ing day . That's just being selfish, and does nothing but
discourage
otherwise useful posters from bothering to contribute here.

I like to be bad once in a while, but generally try to post more about
metal than non-metal. Say, what do you think is the "real" resolution
of a mill with a glass scale DRO?

I doubt he knows the answer to that any more than I do. But the thing is,
what's wrong with having other threads going besides metal related ones?
Can't people talk about more than one thing at a time on a newsgroup? I
don't post any metal related content because I don't know that much about
metalworking to contribute to people who know a lot more than me. But I do
read the metal related posts of others and have learned a lot from them. So
whether I'm learning something I didn't know about metal or about the antics
of the Palin family I don't see anything wrong with discussing both topics
at the same place. I don't know what's wrong with the guys who can't stand
anything but metal content except they have to be a bunch of babies. After
all, if you don't want to discuss anything besides metal content nobody is
forcing them to.

Hawke