Some members of this list, that won't be mentioned, are snip challenged. I
find that hard to believe since most of us on this list are used to removing
material to get down to those portions we are interested in.

A one sentence reply to a 300 line posting is ridiculous. Most of us have
news readers that thread properly so we know what was said before, we don't
need to scroll though it again.

Please snip replies to monster posts, the life of my page down key depends
on your co-operation.

Thanks,

Wes

"Wes" wrote in message
...
Some members of this list, that won't be mentioned, are snip challenged.
I
find that hard to believe since most of us on this list are used to
removing
material to get down to those portions we are interested in.

A one sentence reply to a 300 line posting is ridiculous. Most of us have
news readers that thread properly so we know what was said before, we
don't
need to scroll though it again.

Please snip replies to monster posts, the life of my page down key depends
on your co-operation.

Thanks,

Wes


Heh!

Pretty big expectation, Wes. Some of the oldest contributors (time-wise, not
age-wise) don't go to the trouble to do any snipping, not even when posting
a one word reply.

I'm with you-----it's very troubling. I hope your request bears fruit.

Harold

Wes wrote:
OK

Les wrote:

Wes wrote:
Thanks!

Some of us top post so it doesn't make any difference. And only a few
drag and drop material from other sources which make s for the horribly
long posts to start with.

Wes wrote:
Some members of this list, that won't be mentioned, are snip challenged. I
find that hard to believe since most of us on this list are used to removing
material to get down to those portions we are interested in.

A one sentence reply to a 300 line posting is ridiculous. Most of us have
news readers that thread properly so we know what was said before, we don't
need to scroll though it again.

Please snip replies to monster posts, the life of my page down key depends
on your co-operation.

Thanks,

Wes

yes, top posting is preferred


"RoyJ" wrote in message
...
Some of us top post so it doesn't make any difference. And only a few drag
and drop material from other sources which make s for the horribly long
posts to start with.

Wes wrote:
Some members of this list, that won't be mentioned, are snip challenged.
I
find that hard to believe since most of us on this list are used to
removing
material to get down to those portions we are interested in.

A one sentence reply to a 300 line posting is ridiculous. Most of us
have
news readers that thread properly so we know what was said before, we
don't
need to scroll though it again. Please snip replies to monster posts,
the life of my page down key depends
on your co-operation.

Thanks,

Wes

Tony wrote:
yes, top posting is preferred


"RoyJ" wrote in message
...

Some of us top post so it doesn't make any difference. And only a
few drag and drop material from other sources which make s for the
horribly long posts to start with.

Wes wrote:

Some members of this list, that won't be mentioned, are snip
challenged. I find that hard to believe since most of us on this
list are used to removing material to get down to those portions
we are interested in.

A one sentence reply to a 300 line posting is ridiculous. Most
of us have news readers that thread properly so we know what was
said before, we don't need to scroll though it again. Please
snip replies to monster posts, the life of my page down key
depends on your co-operation.

Thanks,

Wes




XXXX XX XX XXXX XXXXXX XX
XX XX XXX XX XX XX XX XXXX
XXX XXXX XX XX XX XX XXXX
XXX XX XXXX XX XXXXX XX
XXX XX XXX XX XX XX
XX XX XX XX XX XX
XXXX XX XX XXXX XXXX XX


XXXXX XX XX XX XXXX XXXXXX XX
XX XX XXXX XXX XXX XX X XX X XXXX
XX XX XX XX XXXXXXX XX XX XXXX
XX XX XX XX XXXXXXX XX XX XX
XX XX XXXXXX XX X XX XX XX XX
XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX
XXXXX XX XX XX XX XXXX XXXX XX

"RoyJ" wrote in message
...
Some of us top post so it doesn't make any difference.

If you do that, we might not have any way of knowing exactly what it is you
are replying to. Sometimes it is perfectly OK. Top or bottom posting is not a
religious thing with me, but context is everything.

Vaughn

On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 15:52:10 GMT, with neither quill nor qualm,
"Vaughn Simon" quickly quoth:


"RoyJ" wrote in message
...
Some of us top post so it doesn't make any difference.

If you do that, we might not have any way of knowing exactly what it is you
are replying to. Sometimes it is perfectly OK. Top or bottom posting is not a
religious thing with me, but context is everything.

Topposters are lazy, arrogant bums. /religion

--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?

cavelamb himself wrote:


XXXX XX XX XXXX XXXXXX XX
XX XX XXX XX XX XX XX XXXX
XXX XXXX XX XX XX XX XXXX
XXX XX XXXX XX XXXXX XX
XXX XX XXX XX XX XX
XX XX XX XX XX XX
XXXX XX XX XXXX XXXX XX


XXXXX XX XX XX XXXX XXXXXX XX
XX XX XXXX XXX XXX XX X XX X XXXX
XX XX XX XX XXXXXXX XX XX XXXX
XX XX XX XX XXXXXXX XX XX XX
XX XX XXXXXX XX X XX XX XX XX
XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX
XXXXX XX XX XX XX XXXX XXXX XX


ROTFLMAO!

On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 07:14:03 -0400, Wes wrote:

Les wrote:

Wes wrote:
Thanks!

That should be "TY"

Brevity and all that, wot?

Gunner

Actually, yes, her boobs are huge with large thumb sized nipples that
get even bigger when they are tickled or licked and damn..the woman
has absolutely no gag reflex at all. All the way to the
hair...wowsers.. when she is done, even your toenails are missing and
your nads are the size of raisins.



On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 15:52:10 GMT, "Vaughn Simon"
wrote:




"RoyJ" wrote in message
...
Some of us top post so it doesn't make any difference.


snip


Vaughn




Gunner

On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 09:27:24 -0700, Larry Jaques
wrote:

On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 15:52:10 GMT, with neither quill nor qualm,
"Vaughn Simon" quickly quoth:


"RoyJ" wrote in message
...
Some of us top post so it doesn't make any difference.

If you do that, we might not have any way of knowing exactly what it is you
are replying to. Sometimes it is perfectly OK. Top or bottom posting is not a
religious thing with me, but context is everything.

Topposters are lazy, arrogant bums. /religion


Indeed

Gunner

On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 11:37:20 -0700, Gunner wrote:
Actually, yes, her boobs are huge with large thumb sized nipples that
get even bigger when they are tickled or licked and damn..the woman
has absolutely no gag reflex at all. All the way to the
hair...wowsers.. when she is done, even your toenails are missing and
your nads are the size of raisins.

I find your ideas intriguing and would like to subscribe to your
newsletter.

On Oct 13, 5:27 pm, Larry Jaques
wrote:


Thanks for the compliment.

Dan


Topposters are lazy, arrogant bums. /religion

--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?

On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:34:10 -0400, Tony wrote:

On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:34:10 -0400, Tony top-posted:

yes, top posting is preferred

By you, maybe, but not by the rest of the world:
http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html

Cheers!
Rich



"RoyJ" wrote in message
...
Some of us top post so it doesn't make any difference. And only a few
drag and drop material from other sources which make s for the horribly
long posts to start with.

Wes wrote:
Some members of this list, that won't be mentioned, are snip
challenged. I
find that hard to believe since most of us on this list are used to
removing
material to get down to those portions we are interested in.

A one sentence reply to a 300 line posting is ridiculous. Most of us
have
news readers that thread properly so we know what was said before, we
don't
need to scroll though it again. Please snip replies to monster posts,
the life of my page down key depends
on your co-operation.

Thanks,

Wes

On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 08:53:08 +0000, Harold and Susan Vordos wrote:
"Wes" wrote in message
Some members of this list, that won't be mentioned, are snip challenged.
I find that hard to believe since most of us on this list are used to
removing material to get down to those portions we are interested in.

A one sentence reply to a 300 line posting is ridiculous. Most of us have
news readers that thread properly so we know what was said before, we
don't
need to scroll though it again.

Please snip replies to monster posts, the life of my page down key depends
on your co-operation.

Heh!

Pretty big expectation, Wes. Some of the oldest contributors (time-wise, not
age-wise) don't go to the trouble to do any snipping, not even when posting
a one word reply.

I'm with you-----it's very troubling. I hope your request bears fruit.

Usually, when I see 20 lines of 's, on top of 40 lines of quote, I
just click the "next" button.

So, basically, it's a matter of, do you want your material to be read?

Cheers!
Rich

Wes wrote:
Some members of this list, that won't be mentioned, are snip challenged.
(snip)
Wes
Absolutely true. :-)
...lew...

Les wrote:

Wes wrote:
OK
You out did me :-(
...lew... You didn't leave anything for me to (snip)

cavelamb himself wrote:
XXXX XX XX XXXX XXXXXX XX
XX XX XXX XX XX XX XX XXXX
XXX XXXX XX XX XX XX XXXX
XXX XX XXXX XX XXXXX XX
XXX XX XXX XX XX XX
XX XX XX XX XX XX
XXXX XX XX XXXX XXXX XX


XXXXX XX XX XX XXXX XXXXXX XX
XX XX XXXX XXX XXX XX X XX X XXXX
XX XX XX XX XXXXXXX XX XX XXXX
XX XX XX XX XXXXXXX XX XX XX
XX XX XXXXXX XX X XX XX XX XX
XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX
XXXXX XX XX XX XX XXXX XXXX XX
I like it :-)
...lew...

On 13 Oct 2007 22:53:23 GMT, Dave Hinz wrote:

On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 11:37:20 -0700, Gunner wrote:
Actually, yes, her boobs are huge with large thumb sized nipples that
get even bigger when they are tickled or licked and damn..the woman
has absolutely no gag reflex at all. All the way to the
hair...wowsers.. when she is done, even your toenails are missing and
your nads are the size of raisins.

I find your ideas intriguing and would like to subscribe to your
newsletter.


Shes Mine..alll mine! Muahahahahahaha! gnerk...gurgle....twitch....

Testosterone...anyone got a spare liter or two?

Gunner

"Lew Hartswick" wrote in message
...
cavelamb himself wrote:

Snip, snip, snippety-snip, hack, cut

Is that good enough?



Steve R.



--
Reply address munged to bugger up spammers

Steve R. wrote:
"Lew Hartswick" wrote in message
...

cavelamb himself wrote:


Snip, snip, snippety-snip, hack, cut

Is that good enough?



Steve R.




Grab a chain saw if you need it!