Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
more on welding - pic of weld
Ok, after reading the nice posts by you guys, I measured the OC voltage on the
high setting on my Century 230 AC welder and found it to be only 40V. I then switched the positive lead to the low setting and found an OC voltage of 70V. This made a BIG difference in being able to strike and hold an arc (still not an easy thing to do for me) I then heated some 7018 AC 1/8" rods in the oven at 300 degrees for about 30 min and set the amperage at 110 amps. I got this weld: http://www.skyko.com/halloween/weld.jpg Not really pretty, but i think it has penetrated both pieces. Actually, it has melted a bit too much into the vertical piece...was that because of too much current? too large a diameter rod? holding the rod not at 45 degrees? Thanks for any more tips, Rick |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Looks fine to me for a first try.
Yep, the 'LO' setting usually has the higher open circuit voltage, much easier to strike an arc. Pic is a bit hard to tell, looks like you have a bit of undercut on the upper piece plus the bead looks pretty big. There is no ruler but I assume this is the 1-1/2" stock you mentioned earlier. Try holding the rod at about 30 degrees from horizontal to push the weld puddle up against the vertical part. Watch the puddle closely to see if you are getting fluid flow on both pieces you are welding on. Keep you bead size down to about 3/8" wide measured on the diagonal. Keep at it!! Rick wrote: Ok, after reading the nice posts by you guys, I measured the OC voltage on the high setting on my Century 230 AC welder and found it to be only 40V. I then switched the positive lead to the low setting and found an OC voltage of 70V. This made a BIG difference in being able to strike and hold an arc (still not an easy thing to do for me) I then heated some 7018 AC 1/8" rods in the oven at 300 degrees for about 30 min and set the amperage at 110 amps. I got this weld: http://www.skyko.com/halloween/weld.jpg Not really pretty, but i think it has penetrated both pieces. Actually, it has melted a bit too much into the vertical piece...was that because of too much current? too large a diameter rod? holding the rod not at 45 degrees? Thanks for any more tips, Rick |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
There ya go! Now wire brush it and paint it and it will look great! - GWE
Rick wrote: Ok, after reading the nice posts by you guys, I measured the OC voltage on the high setting on my Century 230 AC welder and found it to be only 40V. I then switched the positive lead to the low setting and found an OC voltage of 70V. This made a BIG difference in being able to strike and hold an arc (still not an easy thing to do for me) I then heated some 7018 AC 1/8" rods in the oven at 300 degrees for about 30 min and set the amperage at 110 amps. I got this weld: http://www.skyko.com/halloween/weld.jpg Not really pretty, but i think it has penetrated both pieces. Actually, it has melted a bit too much into the vertical piece...was that because of too much current? too large a diameter rod? holding the rod not at 45 degrees? Thanks for any more tips, Rick |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Rick wrote:
http://www.skyko.com/halloween/weld.jpg Oh! The halloween-welder, who doesn't want to learn to weld! :-) Not really pretty, but i think it has penetrated both pieces. Not to bad! But you photographed the best weld (my crystal ball tells me) ;-) Actually, it has melted a bit too much into the vertical piece Did you weld in the same position as the photo was? I guess. You have to position the stick about 30 or 35 degrees from the horizontal. E.g. not symetrical to the joint, but bit lower. You have to fight gravity (of the molten material) with blast (of the arc). ...was that because of too much current? too large a diameter rod? Guessing from the photos, the weld will keep. But: It is on the thick end of a good weld (and close to of a too cold one; I see this at the end of the fillet. It should be concave). You should either: - use more current - try a thinner rod - move the stick faster (least probable cause) What's the thickness of the tube? What rod diameter did you use? What current setting? Was there a gap between the two tubes? If yes, how much? Nick -- "Wissenschafts"-Sendung auf einem der Privat-Kanäle: "Der Behälter fasst 200.000 Kubik-Liter." Wie viele Quadrat-Stunden braucht es dann wohl, um ihn voll zu bekommen? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 29 May 2005 21:10:46 GMT, "Rick" wrote:
Ok, after reading the nice posts by you guys, I measured the OC voltage on the high setting on my Century 230 AC welder and found it to be only 40V. I then switched the positive lead to the low setting and found an OC voltage of 70V. This made a BIG difference in being able to strike and hold an arc (still not an easy thing to do for me) I then heated some 7018 AC 1/8" rods in the oven at 300 degrees for about 30 min and set the amperage at 110 amps. I got this weld: http://www.skyko.com/halloween/weld.jpg Not really pretty, but i think it has penetrated both pieces. Actually, it has melted a bit too much into the vertical piece...was that because of too much current? too large a diameter rod? holding the rod not at 45 degrees? Thanks for any more tips, You're rollin' now! 7018 is one of the more difficult rods to strike an arc with. Try some 7014. When starting out, it can be hard to tell operator limitations from equipment problems. Century would not be my recommendation for a machine to learn with, or my choice to use now. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
From the large buildup, it looks like the rod was not moved quickly
enough. I burn enough holes myself. The gap at the upper left may be due to not keeping the rod closer to vertical. The vertical tube is being heated at the very end, which is not much metal. Was the joint tacked on this side before completing the fillet weld? When the joint is started, the metal is cool. By the time the end of the joint is reached, especially with slow movement, quite a bit of heat has accumulated. On Sun, 29 May 2005 21:10:46 GMT, "Rick" wrote: Ok, after reading the nice posts by you guys, I measured the OC voltage on the high setting on my Century 230 AC welder and found it to be only 40V. I then switched the positive lead to the low setting and found an OC voltage of 70V. This made a BIG difference in being able to strike and hold an arc (still not an easy thing to do for me) I then heated some 7018 AC 1/8" rods in the oven at 300 degrees for about 30 min and set the amperage at 110 amps. I got this weld: http://www.skyko.com/halloween/weld.jpg Not really pretty, but i think it has penetrated both pieces. Actually, it has melted a bit too much into the vertical piece...was that because of too much current? too large a diameter rod? holding the rod not at 45 degrees? Thanks for any more tips, Rick |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I went to home depot and got some 3/32" 7018 AC rods made by Lincoln.
This is too hard. The rods keep sticking to the work when trying to strike an arc, then the coating breaks off. I tried the current at 80 amps then 100 amps. The 1/8" rod at least I was able to get a weld going. I forsee that even if I master this stick welding, it is going to take me FOREVER to weld up these 32 or so joints. If MIG is that much easier, it might be worth the investment. Lets say I have $1000 to spend on a MIG outfit, including a gas cylinder and an autodarkening helmet. Welder: SP-175 PLUS - about $750 http://store.aglevtech.net/yhst-1586...pplmigwe1.html Lincoln Pro MIG 175 - on ebay for around $475 new. (is the only diff between this and hte sp-175 plus the tapped voltage?, ie, gun and regulator the same?) http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...9218 799&rd=1 I think i should go for a 220V machine since I use 220 in my shop, so maybe rule out the 135. Gas cylinder is probably about $100, and am guessing the HF helmet is less than $200... So which MIG? thanks for all the free help, btw! Rick |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I went to home depot and got some 3/32" 7018 AC rods made by Lincoln.
This is too hard. The rods keep sticking to the work when trying to strike an arc, That's partly because you chose a tough rod. Try some 3/32" 6013. You'll be amazed at the difference. Lincoln Pro MIG 175 - on ebay for around $475 new. (is the only diff between this and hte sp-175 plus the tapped voltage?, ie, gun and regulator the same?) I have an SP-170T which is an older version of the Pro MIG 175 and I checked parts listings some time ago and found that the SP-170T, SP-175T, MIGPak 15 and WeldPak 155 all used identical parts except for the sticker on the front panel. I've never checked on the + model because there would be so many differences internally but I'm fairly sure they use the same torch, etc. IMHO, unless you plan to become a professional weldor you're wasting your money on the + model. For one thing, it could make it more difficult to learn because you have so many more options to choose from. Also, if it fails the + model will be more expensive to repair and of course there is more that can go wrong with it. I think i should go for a 220V machine since I use 220 in my shop, so maybe rule out the 135. Unless the portability of a 110V machine is important to you you'll be much better off with the 220V unit in the long run. You won't find much (steel that is) that you can't weld with it. When I had a 110V MIG I used my old Lincoln tombstone stick welder for heavy stuff. Since I replaced it with the SP-170T I *very* rarely use the tombstone. Gas cylinder is probably about $100, and am guessing the HF helmet is less than $200... I recommend at least an 80 CF cylinder and it'll probably be a bit more $ than that unless you find a used one somewhere. I paid $114 for mine from Holox about 4 years ago, including the gas. I later bought a 125 CF pure argon tank for TIG at an auction for $40! The helmet you can buy for around $50 if you catch them on sale at HF. This one seems to be the most widely recommended: http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=91212 and it just happens to be on sale for $50 right now. :-) And while I'm throwing in my $0.02 worth, I have a pointer for you on the welding. Before you actually run a bead like the one you show in the picture you'll want to tack the thing together first to minimize warping. For example, if you just weld the bead on one side and then stand back and look at it you'll probably see that your upright piece of tubing now leans a bit toward the side the weld is on. If instead you put a small tack weld on all 4 corners before you run the actual bead the tacks will help to minimize warping. In fact, it's usually a good idea to tack large sections of your project together before welding so you can be sure everything fits properly. Also, there is one gotcha on MIG welding that a lot of people seem to run into when beginning to MIG weld. It is possible to lay a beautiful bead only to find that it's mostly lying on top of the metal rather than having penetrated into the metal. Don't ask me how I know about this one! :-D IMHO the best way to learn not to do this is to learn to watch the puddle instead of just zipping along looking at the cool arc and assuming everything's working well. In other words, get some scrap and practice a bit before you start on your project. It won't take long to get the hang of it and you'll be very glad you did. Best Regards, Keith Marshall "I'm not grown up enough to be so old!" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Rick" wrote in message
news:jPume.12432$Ri3.7769@trnddc09... Lets say I have $1000 to spend on a MIG outfit, including a gas cylinder and an autodarkening helmet. Gas cylinder is probably about $100, and am guessing the HF helmet is less than $200... So which MIG? Again, I would like to recommend the HTP line of welding machines. I have been very pleased with my HTP welder, which I've owned and used without problem for 17 years (they've been in business for 21 years). As far as I know, all their products are made in the US. You can read about the company he http://www.usaweld.com/company/index.htm Their welders are very ruggedly built, with heavy solid-copper transformers, all-metal wire feed mechanisms (as opposed to plastic), very nice steel cabinets, etc. And they carry a 3-year warranty, as well as a 90-day no-questions-asked money-back guarantee. Take a look at these information pages: http://www.usaweld.com/products/mig_...omparison.html http://www.usaweld.com/products/mig_welders/inside.html http://www.usaweld.com/products/mig_...s/outside.html In fact, I recently ordered some replacement contact tips (consumables) from HTP and happened to speak with the president of the company, Jeff Noland. I just gave him my name on the phone and he immediately knew who I was and what system I had bought (even though it's been years since I've ordered anything from them). How many companies offer that kind of service these days? HTP offers a 160 Amp (220VAC) unit for $919.00: http://www.usaweld.com/products/mig_...s/mig_160.html I think this would be the best unit for your needs. You might be able to get a discount by buying direct from HTP (like I did when I bought mine). This unit includes automatic stitch and spot welding controls. (Stitch welding is especially handy for starting out with MIG, particularly on thin materials. It reduces the chance of burn-through and helps you make really nice beads.) Compare the size and features of the HTP MIG 160 to the little welders you were looking at earlier. The larger cabinet allows for larger transformers, diodes, and capacitor banks, as well as more air circulation for better cooling. Also, the HTP welders are mounted on a wheeled undercarriage with a tray to securely mount and carry your gas bottle. (Compressed gas bottles should never be allowed to stand free where they could fall over and break off their neck -- with disastrous results! That means that with those small, "portable" style welders, you'll need to chain your gas bottle to the wall.) HTP also sells a training video for $18.50 (plus $3.85 shipping): http://www.usaweld.com/products/mig_welders/video.html I would recommend that you buy this before buying any MIG welder. It will teach you about MIG welding, and will be a valuable training aid no matter what MIG welder you eventually buy. I think HTP will subtract the cost of the video if you decide to buy one of their welders. All this might sound like I work for the company, but I don't -- I have no financial interest in HTP. I'm just a very satisfied customer. Regards, Michael |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
snip really good stuff!
Also, there is one gotcha on MIG welding that a lot of people seem to run into when beginning to MIG weld. It is possible to lay a beautiful bead only to find that it's mostly lying on top of the metal rather than having penetrated into the metal. Don't ask me how I know about this one! :-D IMHO the best way to learn not to do this is to learn to watch the puddle instead of just zipping along looking at the cool arc and assuming everything's working well. In other words, get some scrap and practice a bit before you start on your project. It won't take long to get the hang of it and you'll be very glad you did. Best Regards, Keith Marshall Thanks Keith, very informative post. Do you think I am giving up on the AC stick welder too soon? Everyone on here says MIG MIG MIG and gives stories about how their 3 y.o. welds car trailers with it. I wish I knew how the MIG would weld this compared to the stick. If it is going to take me 30 hours to weld this with the stick once I learn how to actually get the arc started once out of every ten strikes, and spending some cash on a MIG setup would mean I can do the job with equal strength welds in 5 hours, then it is worth it. Sigh, Rick |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Keith Marshall" wrote in message
.. . The helmet you can buy for around $50 if you catch them on sale at HF. This one seems to be the most widely recommended: http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=91212 and it just happens to be on sale for $50 right now. :-) Harbor Freight sells a couple of similar auto-dark helmets. The other one is this: http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46092 It's also on sale for $50. I tried both in the store and they both seemed to have the same features and specs, but I choose the second one. I can't really remember why I like it better. I was a bit skeptical of these low-cost Chinese helmets, but mine works fine. Having an auto-dark is a heck of a lot better than using traditional flip-down helmets. Don't forget you'll also need some leather welding gloves. And SteveB had a good recommendation about the ear plugs. - Michael |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 29 May 2005 21:10:46 GMT, "Rick" wrote:
Ok, after reading the nice posts by you guys, I measured the OC voltage on the high setting on my Century 230 AC welder and found it to be only 40V. I then switched the positive lead to the low setting and found an OC voltage of 70V. This made a BIG difference in being able to strike and hold an arc (still not an easy thing to do for me) I then heated some 7018 AC 1/8" rods in the oven at 300 degrees for about 30 min and set the amperage at 110 amps. I got this weld: http://www.skyko.com/halloween/weld.jpg Not really pretty, but i think it has penetrated both pieces. Actually, it has melted a bit too much into the vertical piece...was that because of too much current? too large a diameter rod? holding the rod not at 45 degrees? Thanks for any more tips, Rick Looks like a weld to me. And you really didnt need to heat the rod, unless its been wet at one time. Is that 2" square tubing? Try 3/32" rod at about 60 amps or so. Seems to me that you are getting the hang of it nicely. Btw...for knocking off the slag..its really really hard to beat a 4" angle grinder and one of Tom Gardners wire brushes on it. Gunner Gunner "Considering the events of recent years, the world has a long way to go to regain its credibility and reputation with the US." unknown |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 30 May 2005 02:24:15 GMT, "Rick" wrote:
I went to home depot and got some 3/32" 7018 AC rods made by Lincoln. This is too hard. The rods keep sticking to the work when trying to strike an arc, then the coating breaks off. I tried the current at 80 amps then 100 amps. The 1/8" rod at least I was able to get a weld going. I forsee that even if I master this stick welding, it is going to take me FOREVER to weld up these 32 or so joints. If MIG is that much easier, it might be worth the investment. Lets say I have $1000 to spend on a MIG outfit, including a gas cylinder and an autodarkening helmet. Welder: SP-175 PLUS - about $750 http://store.aglevtech.net/yhst-1586...pplmigwe1.html Lincoln Pro MIG 175 - on ebay for around $475 new. (is the only diff between this and hte sp-175 plus the tapped voltage?, ie, gun and regulator the same?) http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...9218 799&rd=1 I think i should go for a 220V machine since I use 220 in my shop, so maybe rule out the 135. Gas cylinder is probably about $100, and am guessing the HF helmet is less than $200... So which MIG? You really dont need the gas cylinder. You can get very acceptable welds with flux core wire. You just have to knock off the slag like you do with stick. I keep an old Lincoln Weldpack 100 on a "hot cart" with a spool of .035 Dualshield in it for fast tacks and bench repairs. Its 110vt, no gas, and works like a champ on stuff up to about 1/4"=5/16". Thicker than that and I run the bigger mig. If you are doing thin wall..that would not be a bad MIG (or the later models) for you. And you can add a solenoid and a gas bottle later. Ive gone almost exclusivly to CO2 on my big MIG because of the cost and the types of rough welding I do..it works just dandy. Gunner thanks for all the free help, btw! Rick "Considering the events of recent years, the world has a long way to go to regain its credibility and reputation with the US." unknown |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 30 May 2005 03:50:18 GMT, "Keith Marshall"
wrote: IMHO the best way to learn not to do this is to learn to watch the puddle instead of just zipping along looking at the cool arc and assuming everything's working well. In other words, get some scrap and practice a bit before you start on your project. It won't take long to get the hang of it and you'll be very glad you did. And use the BFH test on your practice work, then look the welded area from the side to see what kind of penetration you were getting so you can adjust accordingly. Gunner "Considering the events of recent years, the world has a long way to go to regain its credibility and reputation with the US." unknown |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
I just bought the auto shade helmet from harbor. It was marked 99.99 in the
store. I got to the counter and asked about some of the welders and hoods they have online but not in the store the rep told me thats what they are sent. I asked about having it shipped in because I don't like to use credit cards online, he replied that Harbor doesn't do that and even if you pay in advance for the item they won't. After a bit of talking the rep ended up giving me the helmet for 59.99 and also the two year warranty with it. Harbor is having a parking lot sale 6/4 and 6/5 from the flier he had on the counter at the Davenport store, don't know if its going to be at the other stores. I also found out that Harbor has a big catalog that you can have sent to you if you go to their website. "DeepDiver" wrote in message ... "Keith Marshall" wrote in message .. . The helmet you can buy for around $50 if you catch them on sale at HF. This one seems to be the most widely recommended: http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=91212 and it just happens to be on sale for $50 right now. :-) Harbor Freight sells a couple of similar auto-dark helmets. The other one is this: http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/cta...emnumber=46092 It's also on sale for $50. I tried both in the store and they both seemed to have the same features and specs, but I choose the second one. I can't really remember why I like it better. I was a bit skeptical of these low-cost Chinese helmets, but mine works fine. Having an auto-dark is a heck of a lot better than using traditional flip-down helmets. Don't forget you'll also need some leather welding gloves. And SteveB had a good recommendation about the ear plugs. - Michael |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
No need to call yourself a moron.
:P "Rick" wrote in message news:qdqme.6367$m%3.2239@trnddc02... Ok, after reading the nice posts by you guys, I measured the OC voltage on the high setting on my Century 230 AC welder and found it to be only 40V. I then switched the positive lead to the low setting and found an OC voltage of 70V. This made a BIG difference in being able to strike and hold an arc (still not an easy thing to do for me) I then heated some 7018 AC 1/8" rods in the oven at 300 degrees for about 30 min and set the amperage at 110 amps. I got this weld: http://www.skyko.com/halloween/weld.jpg Not really pretty, but i think it has penetrated both pieces. Actually, it has melted a bit too much into the vertical piece...was that because of too much current? too large a diameter rod? holding the rod not at 45 degrees? Thanks for any more tips, Rick |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 30 May 2005 02:24:15 GMT, "Rick" wrote:
I went to home depot and got some 3/32" 7018 AC rods made by Lincoln. This is too hard. The rods keep sticking to the work when trying to strike an arc, then the coating breaks off. I tried the current at 80 amps then 100 amps. The 1/8" rod at least I was able to get a weld going. I forsee that even if I master this stick welding, it is going to take me FOREVER to weld up these 32 or so joints. If MIG is that much easier, it might be worth the investment. Lets say I have $1000 to spend on a MIG outfit, including a gas cylinder and an autodarkening helmet. Welder: SP-175 PLUS - about $750 http://store.aglevtech.net/yhst-1586...pplmigwe1.html Lincoln Pro MIG 175 - on ebay for around $475 new. (is the only diff between this and hte sp-175 plus the tapped voltage?, ie, gun and regulator the same?) http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...9218 799&rd=1 I think i should go for a 220V machine since I use 220 in my shop, so maybe rule out the 135. Gas cylinder is probably about $100, and am guessing the HF helmet is less than $200... So which MIG? I've said that 7018 is hard to strike, you'd do much better with 7014. Having said that: you could do what you want to do with stick and some practice, but you could do it better, sooner, faster and more enjoyably with MIG. For your projects, you'd be very glad you went 220 volt. The 110 volt boxes are really excellent for sheetmetal and autobody work but your projects are a reach for them. They can do it in skilled hands, 220 does it like a walk in the park. The 220 machines have the woof to do the job well. Further, the torches are more robust, and the wire feed mechanisms are considerably more substantial. Balky wirefeed can be very frustrating. I'm an amateur that has been stickwelding for 30 years, and MIG-welding thin metal (autobody) for 20 years. It took me some time and practice to get reasonably competent with stick, but I've built a lot of stuff with 7014 and 11-gage steel. I never really trusted the little MIG for fab with 11-gage or thicker, went with stick for that when strength was important. I did stick some stuff on my trailer with the little MIG, including a spare tire mount that won't be coming loose this lifetime (used fluxcore there) but I wouldn't build a trailer with it. The little Linc duty-cycled out just welding on stake sockets. It got it done with frequent rest periods. I got my 220-volt MIG last autumn. Spent a windfall check on it. I shoulda done it years ago. I love it! I'll probably never stickweld again. If you lived nereby I'd weld your stuff for the sheer fun of doing it -- and maybe a 12pack of Summit Pale Ale. First project was cantilever supports for a workbench. My good neighbor helped me with the woodwork. When it was done, he hopped up on the bench and jumped up and down on it to check it out. Yy! I figured the bench was good for a 500 lb point load per support, but I cringed a little when he did that. He said it felt like floor. Geez, it's an electronics bench, didn't plan to rebuild engines on it! http://users.goldengate.net/~dforeman/workbench/ $100 or a bit less for a 40 cu ft gas cylinder is pretty typical. The HF helmet is more like $50 on a good day. They offer several models, others (e.g. Gunner) can advise on which one to get. Please at least check with a local welding dealer before you buy the welder or bottle from EBay or other internet source. You can try before you buy and you should get a few minutes of good demo and instruction to boot. My local dealer usually can come pretty close to web prices with shipping if I quote a bona fide web price from a reputable source. Don't get spooked by "list" or "retail" price. A good welding store will work with you. On last visit I looked at gas regulators for a friend. They had some rebuilts for less than anything I've seen on EBay, and they stand behind what they sell. The guys at "my" good welding store know welding and can be very helpful. John, the counterman there, , has welded 3/8" hinges to a big trailer using a 90-amp 110-volt wirefeed box. It can be done though few could do it. Lew, the VP, has taught welding and used to build trailers as a sideline (with MIG) simply because he loves to weld. Having a good relationship with a good welding store has been worth a lot to this hacker over the years. My biz is a fleafart to them in the general scheme of things, but they still treat me like a customer, greet me by name when I visit, answer my dumb questions and demo anything I'd like to try. John will happily crimp hose fittings or lugs on welding cable that results in a sale of under 20 bux that visit. Brands: I think Hobart (made by Miller) is probably most bang for the buck. It's a comptent no-frills machine that does the job, has many happy users. I think there's even a Hobart Handler users group. I went with Miller for reasons irrelevant to the work you want to do. I think the Lincoln has continuous (rather than stepped) voltage control. That is very useful with sheetmetal and autobody work but not at all necessary for the thicker metal you want to weld. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Keith Marshall wrote:
For example, if you just weld the bead on one side and then stand back and look at it you'll probably see that your upright piece of tubing now leans a bit toward the side the weld is on. If instead you put a small tack weld on all 4 corners before you run the actual bead the tacks will help to minimize warping. Tacking and welding (+checking angle) in the right sequence is an art by itself. If experienced, you can even adjust out of 90deg. joints. Or, you tack the part on one side out of 90deg. and weld on the other side to get it straight. More verbouse: Say you weld a 90deg. joint. If the angle is OK after tacking weld the flat side center-center (starting in the middle, welding in and out). If it is over 90 deg. weld from the outside to the inside, below 90deg. inside to outside. Takes "some" experience. :-) Nick -- "Wissenschafts"-Sendung auf einem der Privat-Kanäle: "Der Behälter fasst 200.000 Kubik-Liter." Wie viele Quadrat-Stunden braucht es dann wohl, um ihn voll zu bekommen? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Keep using your stick welder and go buy a MIG. You will use both. If you
learn how to stick weld MIG will come real easy. It takes moer skill to use a stick welder but many of the things you nned to be careful of apply to MIG. "Rick" wrote in message news:Uqwme.5714$615.1667@trnddc08... snip really good stuff! Also, there is one gotcha on MIG welding that a lot of people seem to run into when beginning to MIG weld. It is possible to lay a beautiful bead only to find that it's mostly lying on top of the metal rather than having penetrated into the metal. Don't ask me how I know about this one! :-D IMHO the best way to learn not to do this is to learn to watch the puddle instead of just zipping along looking at the cool arc and assuming everything's working well. In other words, get some scrap and practice a bit before you start on your project. It won't take long to get the hang of it and you'll be very glad you did. Best Regards, Keith Marshall Thanks Keith, very informative post. Do you think I am giving up on the AC stick welder too soon? Everyone on here says MIG MIG MIG and gives stories about how their 3 y.o. welds car trailers with it. I wish I knew how the MIG would weld this compared to the stick. If it is going to take me 30 hours to weld this with the stick once I learn how to actually get the arc started once out of every ten strikes, and spending some cash on a MIG setup would mean I can do the job with equal strength welds in 5 hours, then it is worth it. Sigh, Rick |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Rick wrote:
Ok, after reading the nice posts by you guys, I measured the OC voltage on the high setting on my Century 230 AC welder and found it to be only 40V. I then switched the positive lead to the low setting and found an OC voltage of 70V. This made a BIG difference in being able to strike and hold an arc (still not an easy thing to do for me) I then heated some 7018 AC 1/8" rods in the oven at 300 degrees for about 30 min and set the amperage at 110 amps. I got this weld: http://www.skyko.com/halloween/weld.jpg Not really pretty, but i think it has penetrated both pieces. Actually, it has melted a bit too much into the vertical piece...was that because of too much current? too large a diameter rod? holding the rod not at 45 degrees? Thanks for any more tips, Rick The sticking trouble might have come from the rod being hot- a hot 7018 will stick faster than cold (especially restrikes of a short rod without allowing it to cool enough). Did you happen to get Airco brand rod? I really dislike that stuff- it's made by Lincoln but it's different from Lincoln AC7018. Honestly, for a first succesful bead that's not bad. It looks like you had too long of an arc- keep it as short as you can. On thin stuff, root penetration is good to have and you get that by running hot with a fast travel. Gunner's suggestion to go to 3/32" is a good one- I use 3/32" for a lot of work. The suggestion to try a 7014 is also good advice. That runs very nice on AC and gives an attractive weld. There's a lot of slag to it and it's got a rather soft arc- if you're not paying attention you can get slag inclusions in a big way. Running a bit uphill helps with this, as does, again, a short arc and fairly fast travel. You could try a 6013, but I hate that rod.. When I was a kid, going to the VoTech school, that's all they would let us run. I struggled with that rod and finally did some good work, but when I got on a job and they gave me some 7018 I was thrilled at how nice it ran. You can get a MIG, but I always try to discourage anyone from having a MIG (or fluxcore) as a primary machine. Don't be deceived by the theory "it's faster", 'cause for general fab work it's not necessarily that way. Also, 7018 strikes best if you scratch it- tapping is asking for it to stick. Keep something handy that's not grounded to give a couple of good taps to break the flux off the end before restriking. John |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
I think you are giving up too soon on the stick. I suggested 6013, you
insist on working with 7018 Your weld looked fine with the 7018, the sticking problem is endemic with 7018 Stick vs Mig: If you can consistently start a sick rod, your project might go 10% faster with a MIG. Cleanup is also faster on the MIG. Leaving a cold bead on one side of the weld happens with both Mig and stick, it's just more obvious on the stick weld. If you want an excuse to go get a new tool, have at it! (Insert Tim Allen grunt here) If you want to get the job done in minimal amount of time, then not plan to do any other welding for a while, spend the time working on the stick welder. If you spent 2 full hours over a couple of days running 6013 rod downhand on some scrap plate, you will be doing great. You would spend more time than that just loading up and unpacking the new MIG, not to mention the $600 to $1200 for the new 220 volt MIG. wander over to sci.engr.joining.welding the string starting "looking at Millermatics" on May 20. the original poster was in the same boat as you are, was looking at the new machines, got his old stick welder to do what he needed. Rick wrote: snip really good stuff! Also, there is one gotcha on MIG welding that a lot of people seem to run into when beginning to MIG weld. It is possible to lay a beautiful bead only to find that it's mostly lying on top of the metal rather than having penetrated into the metal. Don't ask me how I know about this one! :-D IMHO the best way to learn not to do this is to learn to watch the puddle instead of just zipping along looking at the cool arc and assuming everything's working well. In other words, get some scrap and practice a bit before you start on your project. It won't take long to get the hang of it and you'll be very glad you did. Best Regards, Keith Marshall Thanks Keith, very informative post. Do you think I am giving up on the AC stick welder too soon? Everyone on here says MIG MIG MIG and gives stories about how their 3 y.o. welds car trailers with it. I wish I knew how the MIG would weld this compared to the stick. If it is going to take me 30 hours to weld this with the stick once I learn how to actually get the arc started once out of every ten strikes, and spending some cash on a MIG setup would mean I can do the job with equal strength welds in 5 hours, then it is worth it. Sigh, Rick |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
I'd up the current a bit and get the top part of the weld to wick better to
the vertical. You have a lump where you should have a fillet. -- Why isn't there an Ozone Hole at the NORTH Pole? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks again for all the tips..i will respond more as I try different things.
I obtained some 3/32" 6013, and am practicing with that. I can't find 7014 at the local store or home depot..will have to wait till tuesday to go to a real store. I ran a bead of the 3/32 down a piece of scrap tube, just on the flat, and it does seem to just drag along quite a bit easier than the 7018. One important question I have: It would make part of the design simpler if I can weld the tubes one on top of the other at 90degrees instead of a 90 degree butt joint. Is this going to be ok? I will try one and post a picture. Rick |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Rick wrote:
It would make part of the design simpler if I can weld the tubes one on top of the other at 90degrees instead of a 90 degree butt joint. Cutting might be easier (depends on your equipment). Design easier? I kind of doubt this. Welding will be a tad harder, and the optics will be ugly. :-) Is this going to be ok? I will try one and post a picture. I would be ashamed to show such a joint to someone. ;-)) Nick -- "Wissenschafts"-Sendung auf einem der Privat-Kanäle: "Der Behälter fasst 200.000 Kubik-Liter." Wie viele Quadrat-Stunden braucht es dann wohl, um ihn voll zu bekommen? |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"Nick Müller" wrote in message ... Rick wrote: It would make part of the design simpler if I can weld the tubes one on top of the other at 90degrees instead of a 90 degree butt joint. Cutting might be easier (depends on your equipment). Design easier? I kind of doubt this. Welding will be a tad harder, and the optics will be ugly. :-) Is this going to be ok? I will try one and post a picture. I would be ashamed to show such a joint to someone. ;-)) Nick Yeah, I nixed that idea anyway. I just needed to be able to pass cables through the tubes, and didn't want to add 2 more welds to the structure. I figured it out now though. On the plus side, I made a quick and dirty welding table out of a 3 foot by 4 foot piece of 1 inch thick pool table slate, which anyone can get free at their local pool table dealer. (They sometimes have 1 of a matched set of 3 break, and they toss the other 2). It makes *such* a nice precision non coductive surface to weld on, and it is solid as..well ...a rock :-) I am getting a bit better welds with the 3/32 6013, but I am having problems in the first 1/3 of the weld with slag inclusions...the final 2/3 actually looks like a nice fillet weld. Maybe I should just weld 2/3 of the joint :-) rick |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Rick wrote:
Yeah, I nixed that idea anyway. I just needed to be able to pass cables through the tubes, and didn't want to add 2 more welds to the structure. Now this would have been an argument. It makes *such* a nice precision non coductive surface to weld on, and it is solid as..well ..a rock :-) Non conductive? I prever welding on a table that is conductive. You just hook ground to the table and don't have to re-clamp gnd whenever you move work. I am getting a bit better welds with the 3/32 6013, but I am having problems in the first 1/3 of the weld with slag inclusions...the final 2/3 actually looks like a nice fillet weld. Maybe I should just weld 2/3 of the joint :-) Well, this is the hard part. You have to learn to see the puddle and not to look at the slag. I don't know your numbering system. I think the easiest stick are the cellulose-type. But they are more expensive, stink more and are harder to start. Nick -- "Wissenschafts"-Sendung auf einem der Privat-Kanäle: "Der Behälter fasst 200.000 Kubik-Liter." Wie viele Quadrat-Stunden braucht es dann wohl, um ihn voll zu bekommen? |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Your bad first 1/3 is usually due to racing off before the weld puddle
has fully formed. Try starting about 1/8" from the end, let the puddle form, move to the end, and do your weld. Once you get the hang of starting and the puddle, turn your amperage down, it gives you a lot more time to move the puddle around. You said a 90 degree butt joint? I assume that means an end into a side?? Welding an end to the side of a tube means that you need to put 2/3rds of the heat into the side, 1/3 into the end that will burn though the easiest. Rick wrote: "Nick Müller" wrote in message ... Rick wrote: It would make part of the design simpler if I can weld the tubes one on top of the other at 90degrees instead of a 90 degree butt joint. Cutting might be easier (depends on your equipment). Design easier? I kind of doubt this. Welding will be a tad harder, and the optics will be ugly. :-) Is this going to be ok? I will try one and post a picture. I would be ashamed to show such a joint to someone. ;-)) Nick Yeah, I nixed that idea anyway. I just needed to be able to pass cables through the tubes, and didn't want to add 2 more welds to the structure. I figured it out now though. On the plus side, I made a quick and dirty welding table out of a 3 foot by 4 foot piece of 1 inch thick pool table slate, which anyone can get free at their local pool table dealer. (They sometimes have 1 of a matched set of 3 break, and they toss the other 2). It makes *such* a nice precision non coductive surface to weld on, and it is solid as..well ..a rock :-) I am getting a bit better welds with the 3/32 6013, but I am having problems in the first 1/3 of the weld with slag inclusions...the final 2/3 actually looks like a nice fillet weld. Maybe I should just weld 2/3 of the joint :-) rick |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 30 May 2005 20:19:37 GMT, "Rick" wrote:
I am getting a bit better welds with the 3/32 6013, but I am having problems in the first 1/3 of the weld with slag inclusions...the final 2/3 actually looks like a nice fillet weld. Maybe I should just weld 2/3 of the joint :-) There is no slag (or smoke) with MIG. :) That's really a large part of why I far prefer MIG over stick. Opening the big door for ventilation is no fun in MN during the winter. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 30 May 2005 04:32:15 GMT, "Keith Marshall"
wrote: Thanks Keith, very informative post. Do you think I am giving up on the AC stick welder too soon? Everyone on here says MIG MIG MIG and gives stories about how their 3 y.o. welds car trailers with it. I wish I knew how the MIG would weld this compared to the stick. Well I've always been one to use any excuse to buy a new tool and based on your apparent interests I think you'll get a lot of use out of and enjoy using the MIG. But it wouldn't hurt to try another type of rod with your current welder before giving up on it. Probably the best thing you could do is find someone that will let you test drive their MIG to see if it's as easy as everyone says it is. Isn't there someone you know that has one you can try? Even a cheap fluxcore just to see what it's like... I'd be happy to let you try mine but IIRC you're on the west coast and I'm in North Carolina. :-( Where on the west coast? If you are in So. Cal, Id be happy to let you play with any of the welders I have, stick, tig, mig. Gunner Best Regards, Keith Marshall "I'm not grown up enough to be so old!" "Rick" wrote in message news:Uqwme.5714$615.1667@trnddc08... snip really good stuff! Also, there is one gotcha on MIG welding that a lot of people seem to run into when beginning to MIG weld. It is possible to lay a beautiful bead only to find that it's mostly lying on top of the metal rather than having penetrated into the metal. Don't ask me how I know about this one! :-D IMHO the best way to learn not to do this is to learn to watch the puddle instead of just zipping along looking at the cool arc and assuming everything's working well. In other words, get some scrap and practice a bit before you start on your project. It won't take long to get the hang of it and you'll be very glad you did. Best Regards, Keith Marshall Thanks Keith, very informative post. Do you think I am giving up on the AC stick welder too soon? Everyone on here says MIG MIG MIG and gives stories about how their 3 y.o. welds car trailers with it. I wish I knew how the MIG would weld this compared to the stick. If it is going to take me 30 hours to weld this with the stick once I learn how to actually get the arc started once out of every ten strikes, and spending some cash on a MIG setup would mean I can do the job with equal strength welds in 5 hours, then it is worth it. Sigh, Rick "Considering the events of recent years, the world has a long way to go to regain its credibility and reputation with the US." unknown |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 30 May 2005 04:12:04 GMT, "DeepDiver"
wrote: In fact, I recently ordered some replacement contact tips (consumables) from HTP and happened to speak with the president of the company, Jeff Noland. I just gave him my name on the phone and he immediately knew who I was and what system I had bought (even though it's been years since I've ordered anything from them). How many companies offer that kind of service these days? HTP offers a 160 Amp (220VAC) unit for $919.00: http://www.usaweld.com/products/mig_...s/mig_160.html Interesting..... http://www.danmig.com/mig_200.html http://www.danmig.com/mig_160.html Btw...Dan-mig welders are made in Denmark... http://www.usaweld.com/products/spot...versaspot.html http://www.danmig.com/spotwelder_spotterxl.htm My Dan Mig 200 is at least 20 yrs old and is still percolating just hunky dory, even after spending most of its life in a muffler/autobody shop. Gunner "Considering the events of recent years, the world has a long way to go to regain its credibility and reputation with the US." unknown |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 30 May 2005 20:19:37 GMT, "Rick" wrote:
"Nick Müller" wrote in message .. . Rick wrote: It would make part of the design simpler if I can weld the tubes one on top of the other at 90degrees instead of a 90 degree butt joint. Cutting might be easier (depends on your equipment). Design easier? I kind of doubt this. Welding will be a tad harder, and the optics will be ugly. :-) Is this going to be ok? I will try one and post a picture. I would be ashamed to show such a joint to someone. ;-)) Nick Yeah, I nixed that idea anyway. I just needed to be able to pass cables through the tubes, and didn't want to add 2 more welds to the structure. I figured it out now though. On the plus side, I made a quick and dirty welding table out of a 3 foot by 4 foot piece of 1 inch thick pool table slate, which anyone can get free at their local pool table dealer. (They sometimes have 1 of a matched set of 3 break, and they toss the other 2). It makes *such* a nice precision non coductive surface to weld on, and it is solid as..well ..a rock :-) Id go nuts with that table..my steel top welding table is grounded directly to the machine(s) with a flying ground clamp for stuff that is rusty and wont make contact very well with the table top. Becareful of spalling..where you heat the rock up really hot in one place and a chunk pops out and hits you in the face or the gonads...G But it sounds like you are getting a really good start at doing it right. I am getting a bit better welds with the 3/32 6013, but I am having problems in the first 1/3 of the weld with slag inclusions...the final 2/3 actually looks like a nice fillet weld. Maybe I should just weld 2/3 of the joint :-) rick Gunner "Considering the events of recent years, the world has a long way to go to regain its credibility and reputation with the US." unknown |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HF Welding hood review | Metalworking | |||
tig welding problems | Metalworking | |||
Q: Welding Magnesium | Metalworking | |||
Cheap Welding Wire Wanted (uk)... Please Recomend | Metalworking | |||
gas or not? | Metalworking |