Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
My wife and I have received two recorded message type phone calls in the past two days from someone claiming to be from IRS and that I was being investigated unless I called them. The phone number to call was given as 1-352-281-6660 in both cases.
That same number showed up on caller ID as the number of the calling party. If it is so easy to get these phone numbers, why doesn't some federal agency track these shysters down and prosecute them????? |
#2
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
|
#3
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 8:38:09 PM UTC-5, wrote:
My wife and I have received two recorded message type phone calls in the past two days from someone claiming to be from IRS and that I was being investigated unless I called them. The phone number to call was given as 1-352-281-6660 in both cases. That same number showed up on caller ID as the number of the calling party. If it is so easy to get these phone numbers, why doesn't some federal agency track these shysters down and prosecute them????? Beatrice Bell SE 10 Ave Gainesville Florida 352-281-6660 |
#5
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
On 9/13/2016 9:31 PM, bob_villa wrote:
On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 8:38:09 PM UTC-5, wrote: My wife and I have received two recorded message type phone calls in the past two days from someone claiming to be from IRS and that I was being investigated unless I called them. The phone number to call was given as 1-352-281-6660 in both cases. That same number showed up on caller ID as the number of the calling party. If it is so easy to get these phone numbers, why doesn't some federal agency track these shysters down and prosecute them????? XXXXXXXX XXXXX SE 10 Ave Gainesville Florida 352-281-6660 Maybe or maybe not. Let's also consider that these goofs can spoof caller ID numbers and thus confuse idiots who go on the internet, Google search a number and then post it to these lists which can cause harm to innocent people. I ran the number through a teleco database that is updated intraday and came up with totally different subscriber information Just saying! |
#6
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 8:51:49 PM UTC-5, Dean Hoffman wrote:
On 9/13/16 8:38 PM, wrote: My wife and I have received two recorded message type phone calls in the past two days from someone claiming to be from IRS and that I was being investigated unless I called them. The phone number to call was given as 1-352-281-6660 in both cases. That same number showed up on caller ID as the number of the calling party. If it is so easy to get these phone numbers, why doesn't some federal agency track these shysters down and prosecute them????? Maybe it's the sheer volume of them. I've gotten some new ones the last couple days. The woman wishes me luck if I don't call her number soon. I like to call them back speaking like Achmed The Dead Terrorist as I threaten them telling them I will find them, murder their children and blow up their homes. I had a telepest speaking English as a second language call my cellphone today I assume trying to sell computer service or some scam that would get me to logon to a website that would load ransom-ware. I told him speaking in my own Engrish as a second language voice that I charge $85/hr for computer service. He said,"You have sex with your mother." I said,"No, she's dead. I can't have sex with her anymore." The telepest hung up. I love to frak with telepests. \('')/ [8~{} Uncle Pesky Monster |
#7
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
|
#8
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
|
#9
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
On 9/14/2016 6:46 AM, Frank wrote:
On 9/13/2016 9:38 PM, wrote: My wife and I have received two recorded message type phone calls in the past two days from someone claiming to be from IRS and that I was being investigated unless I called them. The phone number to call was given as 1-352-281-6660 in both cases. That same number showed up on caller ID as the number of the calling party. If it is so easy to get these phone numbers, why doesn't some federal agency track these shysters down and prosecute them????? Without caller ID to identify the caller as someone you know or deal with, nobody can answer the phone anymore. Our feckless government is fully aware of this and does squat. Our laws apply within our borders, but the phone scammers are overseas. Even so, the feds have managed to shut a few of these down. Problem is, it's an endless game of whack-a-mole. Scammer A hires a bunch of people to work the phones, and while doing so, they learn how the scam works. Even if their employer gets shut down, some of them just get into the business themselves and the scam continues - except where it began with one boiler room operation, now there's multiple ones. The "Rachel from Card Services" scam is a known example of that, and the IRS scam is probably doing the same. Once a con artist comes up with a new idea, a bunch more jump on the bandwagon. This has been a problem for decades, so everyone should know by now that you don't _have_ to answer a call, especially when we have the ability to screen calls and take messages. That's the power each of us has for handling these. If you haven't figured that out by now, the problem isn't just getting unwanted calls, it's your inability to figure out how to ignore them. |
#10
Posted to alt.home.repair,uk.rec.driving
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
|
#11
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
On 9/14/2016 8:09 AM, Moe DeLoughan wrote:
On 9/14/2016 6:46 AM, Frank wrote: On 9/13/2016 9:38 PM, wrote: My wife and I have received two recorded message type phone calls in the past two days from someone claiming to be from IRS and that I was being investigated unless I called them. The phone number to call was given as 1-352-281-6660 in both cases. That same number showed up on caller ID as the number of the calling party. If it is so easy to get these phone numbers, why doesn't some federal agency track these shysters down and prosecute them????? Without caller ID to identify the caller as someone you know or deal with, nobody can answer the phone anymore. Our feckless government is fully aware of this and does squat. Our laws apply within our borders, but the phone scammers are overseas. Even so, the feds have managed to shut a few of these down. Problem is, it's an endless game of whack-a-mole. Scammer A hires a bunch of people to work the phones, and while doing so, they learn how the scam works. Even if their employer gets shut down, some of them just get into the business themselves and the scam continues - except where it began with one boiler room operation, now there's multiple ones. The "Rachel from Card Services" scam is a known example of that, and the IRS scam is probably doing the same. Once a con artist comes up with a new idea, a bunch more jump on the bandwagon. This has been a problem for decades, so everyone should know by now that you don't _have_ to answer a call, especially when we have the ability to screen calls and take messages. That's the power each of us has for handling these. If you haven't figured that out by now, the problem isn't just getting unwanted calls, it's your inability to figure out how to ignore them. I know most are overseas. If I get a live one, I've been telling them lately that I'm sorry but I don't speak to colored people. Sorta hope I make them mad enough to quit or demand more money. I'm no computer expert but think there are things we could do. Telephone companies could note millions of calls and cut them off. The "microsoft" scammers could take over a computer that infects them with a fatal virus instead of the other way around. |
#12
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
On 14/09/16 09:38, wrote:
That same number showed up on caller ID as the number of the calling party. If it is so easy to get these phone numbers, why doesn't some federal agency track these shysters down and prosecute them????? I dunno about USA, but in Hong Kong, the caller ID can be forged. Don't trust it. Call the official phone number listed in your government website instead. Don't just blindly follow a given number. -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa |
#13
Posted to alt.home.repair,uk.rec.driving
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
On 14/09/16 20:49, Colonel Edmund J. Burke wrote:
I have been ****ing the IRS for years now. These days April 15th is more like April fools day on the IRS. There are people trained to steal money by cheating using jokes. DO NOT underestimate the power of a joke or any form of mind trick. -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa |
#14
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
Per Moe DeLoughan:
If you haven't figured that out by now, the problem isn't just getting unwanted calls, it's your inability to figure out how to ignore them. It isn't the content of the calls for me... *any* caller has about .7 seconds to show some response and then I hang up... "Hello, this is Pete Cresswell.... HelloHello.... CLICK!". But the sheer number of rings is a problem - even letting them to go answering machine is a problem when you start getting a half-dozen to a dozen a day. I've had plain old basic phone service since Day-1 and, cheap as I am, I am about *that* far away from either putting out the big bucks for CallerID/Simultaneous ring or putting my incoming calls on the VOIP service I use for outgoing. The first option would give me access to apps that crowd-source junk call identification. The second one would let me implement Challenge/Response: "Hello, this is the Cresswell's answering machine. "Press 1 for Joe, Press 2 for Sue..." and so-forth - along with a GoldList of known callers that do not get the prompt. The downsides of the second are uncertainty about how 911 calls would work and family members who do not like change. -- Pete Cresswell |
#15
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
Per Frank:
I'm no computer expert but think there are things we could do. Telephone companies could note millions of calls and cut them off. My gut reaction is that, somehow, the phone companies benefit from those calls. For sure, the cell phone carriers do because they are burning minutes for those on minute-limited plans. For land line carriers, I would think that those calls serve a marketing purpose: selling people like me on paying extra for CallerID/Simultaneous ring. -- Pete Cresswell |
#16
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
Per Mr. Man-wai Chang:
I dunno about USA, but in Hong Kong, the caller ID can be forged. Don't trust it. True in the USA too. On my VOIP service, I have the CallerID spoofed on my cell phone to the cell phone's number when I am using Bria to call via VOIP instead of tMobile. -- Pete Cresswell |
#17
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
But the sheer number of rings is a problem - even letting them to go answering machine is a problem when you start getting a half-dozen to a dozen a day. this is a job the NSA should handle at least we would get some benefit for all the money they get m |
#18
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
|
#19
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:48:16 -0700, Taxed and Spent
wrote: We should let Whitey Bulger out on the condition he solve the problem Can't do that. Feds took his money and guns away. |
#20
Posted to alt.home.repair,uk.rec.sheds,uk.rec.driving
|
|||
|
|||
HROFFMANN@ASSHOLES DOT NET TALKS ABOUT "Internal Revenue Scam"
|
#21
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
You don't have much credibility when you can't even spell my name correctly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
#22
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
|
#23
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
n Wed, 14 Sep 2016 12:44:41 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
You don't have much credibility when you can't even spell my name correctly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can't tell whom you mean if you can't quote some context in the thread. I asked about that before. I was responding to nutcase Burke |
#24
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
|
#25
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:27:37 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
n Wed, 14 Sep 2016 12:44:41 -0700 (PDT), wrote: You don't have much credibility when you can't even spell my name correctly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can't tell whom you mean if you can't quote some context in the thread. I asked about that before. I was responding to nutcase Burke Actually, you were replying to yourself. |
#26
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
You don't have much credibility when you can't even spell my name correctly ! Can't tell whom you mean if you can't quote some context in the thread. I was responding to nutcase Burke .... thus diminishing your own credibility .. |
#27
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
On 9/14/2016 10:27 AM, (PeteCresswell) wrote:
Per Frank: I'm no computer expert but think there are things we could do. Telephone companies could note millions of calls and cut them off. My gut reaction is that, somehow, the phone companies benefit from those calls. For sure, the cell phone carriers do because they are burning minutes for those on minute-limited plans. For land line carriers, I would think that those calls serve a marketing purpose: selling people like me on paying extra for CallerID/Simultaneous ring. That's the way I feel about it. Last I heard the Feds were telling the telephone companies to help otherwise they would step in. Does not make any sense since Feds should have been working with them. |
#28
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 20:17:10 -0400, Frank "frank wrote:
On 9/14/2016 10:27 AM, (PeteCresswell) wrote: Per Frank: I'm no computer expert but think there are things we could do. Telephone companies could note millions of calls and cut them off. My gut reaction is that, somehow, the phone companies benefit from those calls. For sure, the cell phone carriers do because they are burning minutes for those on minute-limited plans. For land line carriers, I would think that those calls serve a marketing purpose: selling people like me on paying extra for CallerID/Simultaneous ring. That's the way I feel about it. Last I heard the Feds were telling the telephone companies to help otherwise they would step in. Does not make any sense since Feds should have been working with them. Consider the numb-nuts in charge and that should explain why the Feds are a no-show. |
#29
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
On 9/14/2016 1:38 AM, joe wrote:
On 09/14/2016 01:38 AM, wrote: My wife and I have received two recorded message type phone calls in the past two days from someone claiming to be from IRS and that I was being investigated unless I called them. The phone number to call was given as 1-352-281-6660 in both cases. That same number showed up on caller ID as the number of the calling party. If it is so easy to get these phone numbers, why doesn't some federal agency track these shysters down and prosecute them????? Small world, I got a similar call. With the right equipment, caller id can be faked. If you're worried about it, call the IRS number listed on the irs.gov website. Not so small. I got one today, and 5 in one day last week. |
#30
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
On 9/14/2016 4:46 AM, Frank wrote:
On 9/13/2016 9:38 PM, wrote: My wife and I have received two recorded message type phone calls in the past two days from someone claiming to be from IRS and that I was being investigated unless I called them. The phone number to call was given as 1-352-281-6660 in both cases. That same number showed up on caller ID as the number of the calling party. If it is so easy to get these phone numbers, why doesn't some federal agency track these shysters down and prosecute them????? Without caller ID to identify the caller as someone you know or deal with, nobody can answer the phone anymore. Our feckless government is fully aware of this and does squat. Blame the government? The phone company could do something about these things. At least offer us a number to call immediately after a scam call that would register the preceding call as a scam, so they can then block all these calls. But no, that's too much bother for them. Maybe the government can require them to clean up their service. |
#31
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
On 9/14/2016 7:25 AM, (PeteCresswell) wrote:
Per Moe DeLoughan: If you haven't figured that out by now, the problem isn't just getting unwanted calls, it's your inability to figure out how to ignore them. It isn't the content of the calls for me... *any* caller has about .7 seconds to show some response and then I hang up... "Hello, this is Pete Cresswell.... HelloHello.... CLICK!". But the sheer number of rings is a problem - even letting them to go answering machine is a problem when you start getting a half-dozen to a dozen a day. I've had plain old basic phone service since Day-1 and, cheap as I am, I am about *that* far away from either putting out the big bucks for CallerID/Simultaneous ring or putting my incoming calls on the VOIP service I use for outgoing. The first option would give me access to apps that crowd-source junk call identification. The second one would let me implement Challenge/Response: "Hello, this is the Cresswell's answering machine. "Press 1 for Joe, Press 2 for Sue..." and so-forth - along with a GoldList of known callers that do not get the prompt. The downsides of the second are uncertainty about how 911 calls would work and family members who do not like change. What I want is a device that will make callers press a # before the phone will pass a ring on to my phones. OR the phone company could do the same before they ring my house. Such devices have been available in the past, but I haven't found any made now. |
#32
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
On 9/14/16 10:25 AM, (PeteCresswell) wrote:
I am about *that* far away from either putting out the big bucks for CallerID/Simultaneous ring or putting my incoming calls on the VOIP service I use for outgoing. Put your incoming calls on VOIP (phone over the internet). Then, sign up for "nomorobo.com". (assuming your ISP/VOIP service will handle it) I had my doubts about it. But for non-commerical use (homeowner), it works, and quite well. Phone rings once, then callerID displays call number. Nothing more. |
#33
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 19:35:47 -0700, Bob F wrote:
Not so small. I got one today, and 5 in one day last week. I got 2 IRS scam calls yesterday within one hour. Maybe 6-7 in the past 3 weeks. |
#34
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
On 9/14/2016 10:25 AM, (PeteCresswell) wrote:
Per Moe DeLoughan: If you haven't figured that out by now, the problem isn't just getting unwanted calls, it's your inability to figure out how to ignore them. It isn't the content of the calls for me... *any* caller has about .7 seconds to show some response and then I hang up... "Hello, this is Pete Cresswell.... HelloHello.... CLICK!". But the sheer number of rings is a problem - even letting them to go answering machine is a problem when you start getting a half-dozen to a dozen a day. I've had plain old basic phone service since Day-1 and, cheap as I am, I am about *that* far away from either putting out the big bucks for CallerID/Simultaneous ring or putting my incoming calls on the VOIP service I use for outgoing. The first option would give me access to apps that crowd-source junk call identification. The second one would let me implement Challenge/Response: "Hello, this is the Cresswell's answering machine. "Press 1 for Joe, Press 2 for Sue..." and so-forth - along with a GoldList of known callers that do not get the prompt. The downsides of the second are uncertainty about how 911 calls would work and family members who do not like change. I, too, have an old land line used for business with fax machine. Connection is FIOS as they are getting rid of copper here but not billed or serviced as VoIP. I could not get an old answering machine to work with it and the fax so will pick it up if I am nearby. 99% of all calls are telemarketers or scammers. Even most of the faxes are spam. I think, particularly when I got it many years ago, that it is under my name as Sr. which I got as a business phone at homeowner price as additional phone. Seniors are targeted by spammers as many are more susceptible to fraud. It's totally disgusting what has happened to our phones. One guy even said he would vote for president anyone that said they would clean up this mess. |
#35
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
On 14/09/16 22:32, (PeteCresswell) wrote:
True in the USA too. On my VOIP service, I have the CallerID spoofed on my cell phone to the cell phone's number when I am using Bria to call via VOIP instead of tMobile. The caller ID is not far from the fax number on incoming fax... I suspect... -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa |
#36
Posted to alt.home.repair,uk.rec.driving
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
On 9/14/2016 6:18 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
On 14/09/16 20:49, Colonel Edmund J. Burke wrote: I have been ****ing the IRS for years now. These days April 15th is more like April fools day on the IRS. There are people trained to steal money by cheating using jokes. DO NOT underestimate the power of a joke or any form of mind trick. Never tell me wot to do, chink. |
#37
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
Per Bob F:
What I want is a device that will make callers press a # before the phone will pass a ring on to my phones. OR the phone company could do the same before they ring my house. Such devices have been available in the past, but I haven't found any made now. That functionality is available if you use a VOIP provider like CallCentric.com. But I like the simplicity of the device a lot better.... seems like there should be some out there considering the need. -- Pete Cresswell |
#38
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
Per John Albert:
Put your incoming calls on VOIP (phone over the internet). Then, sign up for "nomorobo.com". (assuming your ISP/VOIP service will handle it) That's what I was thinking about if/when I go over to CallerID/Simultaneous ring. Had not considered that Simultaneous Ring might be available via my VOIP provider.... Gotta look into that. -- Pete Cresswell |
#39
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
Per Frank:
It's totally disgusting what has happened to our phones. One guy even said he would vote for president anyone that said they would clean up this mess. I'm probably closer to that guy that I would care to admit. And the cynic in me says that if those robocallers that the Pennsylvania State DA claims cannot be prosecuted were to threaten political figures above a certain level, said robocallers would be behind bars within 24 hours. -- Pete Cresswell |
#40
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Internal Revenue Scam OT)
(PeteCresswell) posted for all of us...
Per Frank: It's totally disgusting what has happened to our phones. One guy even said he would vote for president anyone that said they would clean up this mess. I'm probably closer to that guy that I would care to admit. And the cynic in me says that if those robocallers that the Pennsylvania State DA claims cannot be prosecuted were to threaten political figures above a certain level, said robocallers would be behind bars within 24 hours. Heh heh yea they make themselves immune from the common deplorable... -- Tekkie |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Federal Revenue Agents acting as County Building Inspectors | Home Repair | |||
My Lite-On internal DVD writer no longer reads or writes, new internal (SATA) or external (USB) drive? What is preferred? | UK diy | |||
Is Diamond Certified anther scam? Is the BBB a scam | Home Repair | |||
MAKE THOUSANDS FAST!!! NOT A SCAM, I REPEAT THIS IS NOT A SCAM | Home Ownership | |||
NEW INVENTION TO INCREASE YOUR ADSENSE REVENUE | Home Repair |