http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjlzI...&feature=share

This fellow uses the right to keep and bear arms
as an example of how rights are lost.

I think he totally makes sense.

--
..
Christopher A. Young
Learn about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 07:42:37 -0500, Stormin Mormon
wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjlzI...&feature=share

This fellow uses the right to keep and bear arms
as an example of how rights are lost.

I think he totally makes sense.


A right you can't exercise is a right you no longer have. That's been
the approach of the gun-haters.

On 11/30/2013 12:38 PM, Ashton Crusher wrote:
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 07:42:37 -0500, Stormin Mormon
wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjlzI...&feature=share

This fellow uses the right to keep and bear arms
as an example of how rights are lost.

I think he totally makes sense.


A right you can't exercise is a right you no longer have. That's been
the approach of the gun-haters.

Nice straw man there, dude. Most people aren't for banning guns,
they're for stronger regulations surrounding their ownership and use.
Think of it as being akin to pushing for laws that place limits on
women's right to have abortions, or anyone's use of birth control. Or
pain medication, for that matter. You do realize there are people
advocating for the right of medical personnel to refuse to prescribe
or administer pain medication when it conflicts with their religious
beliefs? Yes, there are. It was a primary tenet of Mother Theresa, in
fact. She didn't provide it, because she felt suffering was part of
Gawd's plan.

On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 18:52:30 -0600, Moe DeLoughan wrote:

On 11/30/2013 12:38 PM, Ashton Crusher wrote:
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 07:42:37 -0500, Stormin Mormon
wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjlzI...&feature=share

This fellow uses the right to keep and bear arms
as an example of how rights are lost.

I think he totally makes sense.


A right you can't exercise is a right you no longer have. That's been
the approach of the gun-haters.

Nice straw man there, dude. Most people aren't for banning guns,
they're for stronger regulations surrounding their ownership and use.

You're lying, lefty. Laws are already on the books that aren't being
enforced. The laws that are being proposed (and passed) do *nothing*
but restrict the law-abiding citizen's ability to own guns. They do
absolutely nothing to keep people safer - just the opposite, in fact.

Think of it as being akin to pushing for laws that place limits on
women's right to have abortions, or anyone's use of birth control. Or
pain medication, for that matter.

You mean the right to someone's life?

You do realize there are people
advocating for the right of medical personnel to refuse to prescribe
or administer pain medication when it conflicts with their religious
beliefs?

You're lying, again, lefty.

Yes, there are. It was a primary tenet of Mother Theresa, in
fact. She didn't provide it, because she felt suffering was part of
Gawd's plan.

Why don't you try something relevant, lefty?

On 11/30/2013 1:38 PM, Ashton Crusher wrote:
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 07:42:37 -0500, Stormin Mormon
wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjlzI...&feature=share

This fellow uses the right to keep and bear arms
as an example of how rights are lost.

I think he totally makes sense.


A right you can't exercise is a right you no longer have. That's been
the approach of the gun-haters.


But in the US, we have the right to keep and bear arms, after the
background check, if we can find a gun for sale, if we can find ammo,
and as long as we comply with all the regulations of carry, and get the
necessary permit to carry, which might be issued, or not.

--
..
Christopher A. Young
Learn about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

On 11/30/2013 7:52 PM, Moe DeLoughan wrote:
On 11/30/2013 12:38 PM, Ashton Crusher wrote:
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 07:42:37 -0500, Stormin Mormon
wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjlzI...&feature=share

This fellow uses the right to keep and bear arms
as an example of how rights are lost.

I think he totally makes sense.


A right you can't exercise is a right you no longer have. That's been
the approach of the gun-haters.

Nice straw man there, dude. Most people aren't for banning guns, they're
for stronger regulations surrounding their ownership and use.

Yes, that's step two of three steps described in the video.


--
..
Christopher A. Young
Learn about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

On Saturday, November 30, 2013 7:52:30 PM UTC-5, Moe DeLoughan wrote:
On 11/30/2013 12:38 PM, Ashton Crusher wrote:

On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 07:42:37 -0500, Stormin Mormon

wrote:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjlzI...&feature=share



This fellow uses the right to keep and bear arms

as an example of how rights are lost.



I think he totally makes sense.





A right you can't exercise is a right you no longer have. That's been

the approach of the gun-haters.



Nice straw man there, dude. Most people aren't for banning guns,

they're for stronger regulations surrounding their ownership and use.

Only because those same folks don't know the facts, which are
that there are thousands of gun laws on the books already and most
of them aren't being enforced. A good example being that you
have 40,000 people who illegally apply to buy a gun and fail the
required federal background check. Only 50 or so of them are prosecuted.
So, instead of passing more laws, how about we go find those 40 felons
and prosecute them?



Think of it as being akin to pushing for laws that place limits on

women's right to have abortions, or anyone's use of birth control. Or

pain medication, for that matter. You do realize there are people

advocating for the right of medical personnel to refuse to prescribe

or administer pain medication when it conflicts with their religious

beliefs? Yes, there are. It was a primary tenet of Mother Theresa, in

fact. She didn't provide it, because she felt suffering was part of

Gawd's plan.

I suffer every time I read stuff from you libs. Does that count?

On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 18:52:30 -0600, Moe DeLoughan wrote:

A right you can't exercise is a right you no longer have. That's been
the approach of the gun-haters.

Nice straw man there, dude. Most people aren't for banning guns,
they're for stronger regulations surrounding their ownership and use.

What a crock. Tell us what law, regulation, etc., would you change
about guns? I think you need some homework assignments.

Progressive liberals are destroying this country from the inside.


--
"The definition of a liberal, a liberal is somebody that doesn't care what you do as long as it's mandatory". -- Charles Krauthammer