On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 18:52:30 -0600, Moe DeLoughan wrote:

On 11/30/2013 12:38 PM, Ashton Crusher wrote:
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 07:42:37 -0500, Stormin Mormon
wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjlzI...&feature=share

This fellow uses the right to keep and bear arms
as an example of how rights are lost.

I think he totally makes sense.


A right you can't exercise is a right you no longer have. That's been
the approach of the gun-haters.

Nice straw man there, dude. Most people aren't for banning guns,
they're for stronger regulations surrounding their ownership and use.

You're lying, lefty. Laws are already on the books that aren't being
enforced. The laws that are being proposed (and passed) do *nothing*
but restrict the law-abiding citizen's ability to own guns. They do
absolutely nothing to keep people safer - just the opposite, in fact.

Think of it as being akin to pushing for laws that place limits on
women's right to have abortions, or anyone's use of birth control. Or
pain medication, for that matter.

You mean the right to someone's life?

You do realize there are people
advocating for the right of medical personnel to refuse to prescribe
or administer pain medication when it conflicts with their religious
beliefs?

You're lying, again, lefty.

Yes, there are. It was a primary tenet of Mother Theresa, in
fact. She didn't provide it, because she felt suffering was part of
Gawd's plan.

Why don't you try something relevant, lefty?