Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can one get a control where you can specify the output AC voltage very
accurately, even though the input voltage isn't accurate? It would be for input to my air turbine. The air turbine always needs input voltage much lower than the line voltage. So the control wouldn't need step-up circuitry. With the rheostat that comes with my air turbine, it's very sensitive to changes in the line voltage. So I was thinking about bypassing the rheostat instead of buying a power conditioner and trying to supply very accurate voltage to the rheostat. Laura |
#2
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does the voltage have to be regulated -- that is, automatically adjust as
the line voltage changes? If not -- just stick a cheap DVM on the turbine! |
#3
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 8:37*am, "William Sommerwerck"
wrote: Does the voltage have to be regulated -- that is, automatically adjust as the line voltage changes? I'm not sure. The turbine is very sensitive to changes in line voltage. A change of 1 volt in line voltage causes a noticeable change in airflow. However, there's a rheostat between the turbine and the power source, could be the rheostat is very sensitive to changes in line voltage. I could check that with my voltmeter I guess. If not -- just stick a cheap DVM on the turbine! Digital voltmeter? |
#4
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 5:29*am, Laurav wrote:
Can one get a control where you can specify the output AC voltage very accurately, even though the input voltage isn't accurate? It would be for input to my air turbine. *The air turbine always needs input voltage much lower than the line voltage. *So the control wouldn't need step-up circuitry. With the rheostat that comes with my air turbine, it's very sensitive to changes in the line voltage. So I was thinking about bypassing the rheostat instead of buying a power conditioner and trying to supply very accurate voltage to the rheostat. Laura you didn't say how much power the turbine takes. and if it cycles once in a while, or a lot. Two ways come to mind: 1. you can use a passive 'regulator' [by Solar?] It's a resonating transformer, so you have to specificy 50 or 60Hz. Very large for the amount of power that goes through them, but they regulate to 1%, which is around 1 Volt, then you could put a Variac after the regulator and adjust the voltage pretty exactly. Not much wasted power here. 2. Another, but complicated way, is to use a Saturable Core Reactor in series with your load. No current through control winding on core, very small voltage to load. Maximum DC current through control winding on core, and the reactor 'disappears', gone, so you get a lot of voltage to the load, but not all. Combine with simple AC to DC bridge circuit, resistors, and feed that current back into the control winding [right phase] and voila! pretty EXACT voltage, and automatic. If the technology is too daunting, post your request on craigslist, http://YOUR_REGION.craigslist.org/egr for like $25 you can pick up a technician or engineer who'll put it all together for you. |
#5
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 9:31*am, Robert Macy wrote:
you didn't say how much power the turbine takes. and if it cycles once in a while, or a lot. I checked the output voltage of the rheostat on the AC setting of the voltmeter, and it's about 104 volts. I turn it up sometimes briefly. It uses about 1-2 amps. Laura |
#6
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/15/2012 7:34 AM, Laurav wrote:
On Jun 15, 9:31 am, Robert wrote: you didn't say how much power the turbine takes. and if it cycles once in a while, or a lot. I checked the output voltage of the rheostat on the AC setting of the voltmeter, and it's about 104 volts. I turn it up sometimes briefly. It uses about 1-2 amps. Laura I have a regulator box that has inside a motorized variac. Moves the variac to compensate for input voltage changes. But its reaction time isn't very fast. |
#7
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 6:31*am, Robert Macy wrote:
On Jun 15, 5:29*am, Laurav wrote: Can one get a control where you can specify the output AC voltage very accurately, even though the input voltage isn't accurate? It would be for input to my air turbine. *The air turbine always needs input voltage much lower than the line voltage. *So the control wouldn't need step-up circuitry. With the rheostat that comes with my air turbine, it's very sensitive to changes in the line voltage. So I was thinking about bypassing the rheostat instead of buying a power conditioner and trying to supply very accurate voltage to the rheostat. Laura you didn't say how much power the turbine takes. and if it cycles once in a while, or a lot. Two ways come to mind: 1. you can use a passive 'regulator' [by Solar?] It's a resonating transformer, so you have to specificy 50 or 60Hz. Very large for the amount of power that goes through them, but they regulate to 1%, which is around 1 Volt, then you could put a Variac after the regulator and adjust the voltage pretty exactly. Not much wasted power here. The cheapest Sola constant voltage transformer still costs several hundred dollars. |
#8
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/15/2012 5:29 AM, Laurav wrote:
Can one get a control where you can specify the output AC voltage very accurately, even though the input voltage isn't accurate? It would be for input to my air turbine. The air turbine always needs input voltage much lower than the line voltage. So the control wouldn't need step-up circuitry. With the rheostat that comes with my air turbine, it's very sensitive to changes in the line voltage. So I was thinking about bypassing the rheostat instead of buying a power conditioner and trying to supply very accurate voltage to the rheostat. Laura You could use a Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS). You'd need the kind that is always regulating the output voltage (an online UPS), rather than just turning on when power is lost or sagging badly (a standby UPS). See this article for further explanation: http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia_te...i=53509,00.asp |
#9
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:30:50 -0700 (PDT), spamtrap1888
wrote: The cheapest Sola constant voltage transformer still costs several hundred dollars. Times have changed. While Sola products are rather expensive, there are plenty of cheap constant voltage transformers on the market. For example: http://www.ebay.com/itm/260591849083 http://www.ebay.com/itm/360320802787 Like all good resonant power transformers, they buzz and run warm. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#10
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
spamtrap1888 wrote:
The cheapest Sola constant voltage transformer still costs several hundred dollars. http://www.ebay.com/itm/Sola-Constan...em3f0eab 6e29 Yes, for *very* small values of 'several hundred'. ![]() --Winston |
#11
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 9:19*am, Winston wrote:
spamtrap1888 wrote: The cheapest Sola constant voltage transformer still costs several hundred dollars. http://www.ebay.com/itm/Sola-Constan...er-23-22-125-H... Yes, for *very* small values of 'several hundred'. * ![]() In that case: even the cheapest Mercedes still costs $300, because that's how much someone wants for one in the Penny Saver. |
#12
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
spamtrap1888 wrote:
On Jun 15, 9:19 am, wrote: spamtrap1888 wrote: The cheapest Sola constant voltage transformer still costs several hundred dollars. http://www.ebay.com/itm/Sola-Constan...er-23-22-125-H... Yes, for *very* small values of 'several hundred'. ![]() In that case: even the cheapest Mercedes still costs $300, because that's how much someone wants for one in the Penny Saver. Yup. There aren't too many $300 Mercedes that the seller will accept back if the buyer is not satisfied however. ![]() BTDT, forgot to pick up the teeshirt. --Winston |
#13
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Laurav wrote:
Can one get a control where you can specify the output AC voltage very accurately, even though the input voltage isn't accurate? It would be for input to my air turbine. The air turbine always needs input voltage much lower than the line voltage. So the control wouldn't need step-up circuitry. With the rheostat that comes with my air turbine, it's very sensitive to changes in the line voltage. So I was thinking about bypassing the rheostat instead of buying a power conditioner and trying to supply very accurate voltage to the rheostat. Laura Ah, now comes the clue.... You don't have problems with your voltage.. It's a simple matter of mass air flow and your motor design.. You need a closed loop PID controller to keep that steady.. Jamie |
#14
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 11:49*am, Bennett wrote:
You could use a Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS). *You'd need the kind that is always regulating the output voltage (an online UPS), rather than just turning on when power is lost or sagging badly (a standby UPS). Would a UPS that outputs voltage exact to within 1% or so be very expensive? Also, can one get a UPS with adjustable output voltage? Laura |
#15
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 11:49 am, Bennett wrote:
You could use a Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS). You'd need the kind that is always regulating the output voltage (an online UPS), rather than just turning on when power is lost or sagging badly (a standby UPS). Would a UPS that outputs voltage exact to within 1% or so be very expensive? Also, can one get a UPS with adjustable output voltage? Laura |
#16
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 7:43*pm, Jamie
t wrote: * Ah, now comes the clue.... You don't have problems with your voltage.. * *It's a simple matter of mass air flow and your motor design.. * You need a closed loop PID controller to keep that steady.. No, it's definitely very voltage-sensitive. The guy who makes and sells the turbine told me that the motor speed is linear with the voltage, in the range of 100-120 V. The motor speed varies greatly over that range, from close to zero to max. Laura |
#17
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Laurav wrote:
On Jun 15, 7:43 pm, Jamie t wrote: Ah, now comes the clue.... You don't have problems with your voltage.. It's a simple matter of mass air flow and your motor design.. You need a closed loop PID controller to keep that steady.. No, it's definitely very voltage-sensitive. The guy who makes and sells the turbine told me that the motor speed is linear with the voltage, in the range of 100-120 V. The motor speed varies greatly over that range, from close to zero to max. Laura Yes, I hear you and still, it is a mass air flow and motor design problem.. You most likely got a split phase shaded pole/capacitor motor that is improperly being controlled. Just your basic window fan motor that shifts greatly in speed under just slightly altered conditions, including mass flow. You need to closed loop controller... Jamie |
#18
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 8:58*pm, Jamie
t wrote: * Yes, I hear you and still, it is a mass air flow and motor design problem.. I haven't noticed that the motor speed is sensitive to anything else besides voltage, and the guy who makes the motor says that's the only thing that causes changes in speed. You could send your suggestions to Turbine Products, see what he says. In any case I need to deal with this particular motor, not some future version. Laura |
#19
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Laurav wrote:
On Jun 15, 8:58 pm, Jamie t wrote: Yes, I hear you and still, it is a mass air flow and motor design problem.. I haven't noticed that the motor speed is sensitive to anything else besides voltage, and the guy who makes the motor says that's the only thing that causes changes in speed. You could send your suggestions to Turbine Products, see what he says. In any case I need to deal with this particular motor, not some future version. Laura Regulating the voltage is only going to fix part of your problem, the issues are that your motor design is very sensitive to RPM changes with load changes. If you were to sit down and attempt to calculate the difference in voltage needed per RPM, you'll find that it's all over the place.. Motor speed in your case is like an inverse log, once you get it out of the hole, it'll speed up greater than expected. It's all about slip in an AC motor under load changes. AC motors do not have much torque at the lower RPM, unless of course, you're doing vector mode, and I know for a fact you're not doing that. Your problem will not go away that easy how ever, a thyristor controller may work a little better over having a rheostat, but then again, you may have a slight drop on the high end of those. what you have there is a low end design.. What you should have is a brushless DC motor which requires a speed controller.. THey do make integrated Brushless DC motors. We use them at work in vacuum loaders and they are good at maintaining speed. They are integrated motors of high RPM with a 0..10 volt input speed control reference. They are a closed loop and thus can monitor its own RPM. Jamie |
#20
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 6:02*pm, Laurav wrote:
On Jun 15, 8:58*pm, Jamie t wrote: * Yes, I hear you and still, it is a mass air flow and motor design problem.. I haven't noticed that the motor speed is sensitive to anything else besides voltage, and the guy who makes the motor says that's the only thing that causes changes in speed. You could send your suggestions to Turbine Products, see what he says. In any case I need to deal with this particular motor, not some future verarsion. Have you considered that Turbine Products, whatever that may be, have sold you a piece of unusable garbage? Why are they not modifying their equipment to make it usable? Or at least providing you the applications support that you are seeking here? They're responsible for the halfassed design of this POS. |
#21
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/15/2012 5:29 PM, Laurav wrote:
On Jun 15, 11:49 am, Bennett wrote: You could use a Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS). You'd need the kind that is always regulating the output voltage (an online UPS), rather than just turning on when power is lost or sagging badly (a standby UPS). Would a UPS that outputs voltage exact to within 1% or so be very expensive? Also, can one get a UPS with adjustable output voltage? Laura They are pretty expensive - $350 and up. Output voltage usually not adjustable; the built in rheostat that you've got would adjust the voltage. BTW, what is an Air Turbine; what does it do? |
#22
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 11:10*pm, Bennett wrote:
BTW, what is an Air Turbine; what does it do? It pushes air through a long hose to an airline respirator. So unlike a fan, it's pushing a small amount of air, 4-5 CFM typically, but high pressure is needed to push the air. Really, the people who are criticizing the motor design should send their ideas to Turbine Products. I'd be interested to hear what he has to say. Laura |
#23
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 11:10*pm, Bennett wrote:
BTW, what is an Air Turbine; what does it do? It pushes a small airflow, like 4-6 CFM, through a long hose to a respirator. It needs to generate a lot of pressure to push the air, unlike a fan. Laura |
#24
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Laurav" wrote in message ... On Jun 15, 11:10 pm, Bennett wrote: BTW, what is an Air Turbine; what does it do? It pushes air through a long hose to an airline respirator. So unlike a fan, it's pushing a small amount of air, 4-5 CFM typically, but high pressure is needed to push the air. Really, the people who are criticizing the motor design should send their ideas to Turbine Products. I'd be interested to hear what he has to say. Laura _______ Do you have a link to any additional information, pictures, specs, etc.? |
#25
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:02:58 -0700 (PDT), Laurav
wrote: On Jun 15, 8:58*pm, Jamie wrote: * Yes, I hear you and still, it is a mass air flow and motor design problem.. I haven't noticed that the motor speed is sensitive to anything else besides voltage, and the guy who makes the motor says that's the only thing that causes changes in speed. You could send your suggestions to Turbine Products, see what he says. In any case I need to deal with this particular motor, not some future version. Laura Greetings Laura, Can you supply any info on the motor itself? Not the current draw but the type of motor? Maybe a picture of the motor? I suspect it is a shaded pole motor. Also, you wrote about a rheostat controlling the motor speed. Is that all there is to control the motor speed? Just a variable resistor like a volume control in a radio? Thanks, Eric |
#26
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 16, 12:57*am, wrote:
Can you supply any info on the motor itself? Not the current draw but the type of motor? He said it's a universal motor. It has brushes. It would be enough to control the input voltage, that's what I'm now trying to do by hand. I think if I were standing by the rheostat all the time, I could control the motor speed well enough. It's in a metal box, I don't know what's inside the box. What Jamie seemed to be saying is that there's some kind of feedback loop that might make the motor very voltage-sensitive, that he said would apply to a fan motor. This isn't a fan, it's an air turbine. In any case, this is what I have, and what I'd like to get running more evenly. It's not like there are a huge variety of airline respirators on the market. I'm not sure if the very expensive NIOSH-certified ones have more sophisticated motor control or not. I somewhat doubt it - I called one company and he said the innards were about the same for his NIOSH-certified version vs the home use version. These airline respirators are used by auto body workers or hobbyists, sandblasters, etc. Precise volume control might not be necessary for them. The voltage at an outlet does seem to vary more than the utility co. voltage, so I may have electrical problems that can be fixed and would give more even airflow. Laura |
#27
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's what the guy who makes the respirator said, relevant to voltage
sensitivity: "the motor speed change should be proportional to the voltage change, but that effect is amplified by the lowering of static pressure and the head loss in the air line, so the air flow reduction at free flow (at the air pump with no hose) would be reduced even more if measured at the end of the air hose." |
#28
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The following sounds sarcastic, but the question is unavoidable...
WHY does the flow have to be so precisely regulated? Are you worried about bursting the lungs of the person on the respirator? It would be much easier to have the turbine run at a constant speed and use a simple valve at the patient's end to bleed off excess flow. (Of course, if respirators were made that way, we wouldn't be discussing how to regulate the turbine speed.) |
#29
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 16, 9:45*am, "William Sommerwerck"
wrote: WHY does the flow have to be so precisely regulated? Are you worried about bursting the lungs of the person on the respirator? Because the motor is too noisy at high speed. Yes, excess flow passes through a valve to the outside. Laura |
#30
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 8:51*pm, Laurav wrote:
On Jun 15, 11:10*pm, Bennett wrote: BTW, what is an Air Turbine; what does it do? It pushes air through a long hose to an airline respirator. *So unlike a fan, it's pushing a small amount of air, 4-5 CFM typically, but high pressure is needed to push the air. Really, the people who are criticizing the motor design should send their ideas to Turbine Products. *I'd be interested to hear what he has to say. You are the only person here who is their customer. You have a contractual relationship. You have a legitimate complaint with the product you gave them your hardearned money in exchange. Any queries a merely curious third party -- like the posters here -- might have can be safely ignored. |
#31
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 16, 6:15*am, Laurav wrote:
On Jun 16, 12:57*am, wrote: Can you supply any info on the motor itself? Not the current draw but the type of motor? He said it's a universal motor. *It has brushes. It would be enough to control the input voltage, that's what I'm now trying to do by hand. *I think if I were standing by the rheostat all the time, I could control the motor speed well enough. It's in a metal box, I don't know what's inside the box. What Jamie seemed to be saying is that there's some kind of feedback loop that might make the motor very voltage-sensitive, that he said would apply to a fan motor. *This isn't a fan, it's an air turbine. In any case, this is what I have, and what I'd like to get running more evenly. It's not like there are a huge variety of airline respirators on the market. *I'm not sure if the very expensive NIOSH-certified ones have more sophisticated motor control or not. *I somewhat doubt it - I called one company and he said the innards were about the same for his NIOSH-certified version vs the home use version. These airline respirators are used by auto body workers or hobbyists, sandblasters, etc. *Precise volume control might not be necessary for them. So it's OK if something designed to protect human life works like crap? I'm not sure how they figured that that was OK. The voltage at an outlet does seem to vary more than the utility co. voltage, so I may have electrical problems that can be fixed and would give more even airflow. Laura You said that the speed varied completely within a 20 VAC range -- 100-120VAC -- that the input voltage was critical to fan speed. Turbine Products did not design a product to cope with normal voltage fluctuations, which can easily be +/-10%. Is this UL approved? Is there some safety standard it's supposed to comply with? Have you contacted NIOSH to tell them of your complaint? |
#32
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually the other brands of airline respirators that I looked at
don't even have a volume control. They just push air at a very high volume. Very loud. Laura |
#33
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
WHY does the flow have to be so precisely regulated? Are
you worried about bursting the lungs of the person on the respirator? Because the motor is too noisy at high speed. Yes, excess flow passes through a valve to the outside. Okay. Then why is such tight regulation required? |
#34
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 16, 10:53*am, "William Sommerwerck"
wrote: Okay. Then why is such tight regulation required? Because it's noisy at high speed. Both inside and outside the mask. |
#35
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 11:10*pm, Bennett wrote:
They are pretty expensive - $350 and up. *Output voltage usually not adjustable; the built in rheostat that you've got would adjust the voltage. About how much would a UPS cost that regulates output voltage within 1% ? The turbine uses about 1-2 A on the usual setting. On the highest setting it uses 9 A, but I never use it that high. Laura |
#36
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 16, 12:24*pm, Laurav wrote:
On Jun 15, 11:10*pm, Bennett wrote: They are pretty expensive - $350 and up. *Output voltage usually not adjustable; the built in rheostat that you've got would adjust the voltage. About how much would a UPS cost that regulates output voltage within 1% ? The turbine uses about 1-2 A on the usual setting. *On the highest setting it uses 9 A, but I never use it that high. Laura ps Can anyone point me to such a UPS? thanks |
#37
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Laurav wrote:
Here's what the guy who makes the respirator said, relevant to voltage sensitivity: "the motor speed change should be proportional to the voltage change, but that effect is amplified by the lowering of static pressure and the head loss in the air line, so the air flow reduction at free flow (at the air pump with no hose) would be reduced even more if measured at the end of the air hose." If you remove the load from a series wound motor (universal), it'll increase in RPM's, greatly in many cases. That type of motor is very sensitive to supply and exhaust flow.. essentially, you have a vacuum loader/cleaner motor.. The only way to properly regulate that is to measure the air mass flow and use that as the feed back. RPM's is going to vary to maintain flow. In a series wound motor, like you have, it is almost a natural. P.S. They make Brushless vacuum/blower motors that produce high volumes with integrated electronics for speed control of a simple 0..10 volts. They just cost more... Are you getting the image now? http://www.grainger.com/Grainger/DOM...VY4?Pid=search That is the idea of what I am talking about, however, that unit there is far to large for what you're talking about. You seem to think what you have is some high volume unit? It is actually very small compared to what I deal with. In your case, I can understand why. You don't need to be over inflated! ![]() Seeing that this is a medical device you have, I don't see you getting much help from those that cold make that unit more suitable for your needs, even though there are many that can do it for you. I think you understand what I am talking about there, it's to bad but that has what the world has turned to. Personally, I can't believe they put in a universal motor, in the first place? You need to keep an eye on the brushes! They don't last like you think they should. It's called cheap, cheap!... Jamie |
#38
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/15/2012 5:29 AM, Laurav wrote:
Can one get a control where you can specify the output AC voltage very accurately, even though the input voltage isn't accurate? It would be for input to my air turbine. The air turbine always needs input voltage much lower than the line voltage. So the control wouldn't need step-up circuitry. With the rheostat that comes with my air turbine, it's very sensitive to changes in the line voltage. So I was thinking about bypassing the rheostat instead of buying a power conditioner and trying to supply very accurate voltage to the rheostat. Laura I wonder whether a viable alternative is to control the air pressure rather than the voltage. Set the turbine output somewhat high and let an air pressure controller deliver the correct pressure to the mask. Take a look at, e.g., http://www.regulatorstore.com/ http://www.controlair.com/index.php/regulatorproducts I wouldn't worry too much about the motor's brushes wearing out too quickly. Lots of home appliances (vacuum cleaner, blender, hair dryer, coffee grinder) have brushes and last for years (albeit with intermittent duty). |
#39
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bennett wrote:
On 6/15/2012 5:29 AM, Laurav wrote: Can one get a control where you can specify the output AC voltage very accurately, even though the input voltage isn't accurate? It would be for input to my air turbine. The air turbine always needs input voltage much lower than the line voltage. So the control wouldn't need step-up circuitry. With the rheostat that comes with my air turbine, it's very sensitive to changes in the line voltage. So I was thinking about bypassing the rheostat instead of buying a power conditioner and trying to supply very accurate voltage to the rheostat. Laura I wonder whether a viable alternative is to control the air pressure rather than the voltage. Set the turbine output somewhat high and let an air pressure controller deliver the correct pressure to the mask. Take a look at, e.g., http://www.regulatorstore.com/ http://www.controlair.com/index.php/regulatorproducts I wouldn't worry too much about the motor's brushes wearing out too quickly. Lots of home appliances (vacuum cleaner, blender, hair dryer, coffee grinder) have brushes and last for years (albeit with intermittent duty). She needs a Dyson Air multiplier ![]() Jamie |
#40
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 16, 9:25*am, Laurav wrote:
On Jun 16, 12:24*pm, Laurav wrote: On Jun 15, 11:10*pm, Bennett wrote: They are pretty expensive - $350 and up. *Output voltage usually not adjustable; the built in rheostat that you've got would adjust the voltage. About how much would a UPS cost that regulates output voltage within 1% ? The turbine uses about 1-2 A on the usual setting. *On the highest setting it uses 9 A, but I never use it that high. Laura ps Can anyone point me to such a UPS? thanks didn't see any specific responses, so try search for UPS in the 200+VA range, to be certain it'll give no problems find something 400+ VA that is constantly running. When you find something that you 'think' might work within budget; post a URL here and everyone will look at it and give excellent critiques. Then you can buy it and be done with it. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sorta OT, input voltage for LED light source question | Metalworking | |||
Voltage output over time.... | Electronics | |||
Voltage input question | Electronics | |||
digital voltage output | Electronics | |||
Audio Voltage Output | Electronics |