Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 16, 1:33*pm, Jamie
t wrote: The only way to properly regulate that is to measure the air mass flow and use that as the feed back. I suggested that to the guy who makes them. It would be great if you could set 5 CFM on the dial and be done with it. Roughly how much more expensive would that be? The web link you gave for the brushless DC motor is $1300. He charges $250 for this motor. RPM's is going to vary to maintain flow. Not much in my experience, I'm adjusting the rheostat manually and if I were standing by it, I could adjust the flow well enough. *You seem to think what you have is some high volume unit? No, it's a low volume of air. However it pushes the air at high pressure, because it has to go through many feet of hose. He said it has high static pressure. Do you know how that changes the controller picture? * Seeing that this is a medical device you have It's an industrial safety device actually. You need to keep an eye on the brushes! They don't last like you think they should. Yes, the brushes have worn out twice on me already. The motor just quits without warning ![]() an idea though - if you open the motor housing, is it easy to tell how worn the brushes are? Laura |
#42
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 16, 1:50*pm, Bennett wrote:
I wonder whether a viable alternative is to control the air pressure rather than the voltage. It's the motor itself that needs to be controlled. It gets too noisy at high speed. Laura |
#43
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 16, 1:33*pm, Jamie
t wrote: * Seeing that this is a medical device you have, I don't see you getting much help from those that cold make that unit more suitable for your needs, even though there are many that can do it for you. It's actually an industrial safety device. It's for use in environments that aren't immediately dangerous to life or health. Autobody workers use such respirators, because they work with chemicals like isocyanates that won't immediately cause damage, but you don't want to be breathing them long-term. If it fails on me I get sick for several days. Laura |
#44
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:15:34 -0700 (PDT), Laurav
wrote: On Jun 16, 12:57*am, wrote: Can you supply any info on the motor itself? Not the current draw but the type of motor? He said it's a universal motor. It has brushes. It would be enough to control the input voltage, that's what I'm now trying to do by hand. I think if I were standing by the rheostat all the time, I could control the motor speed well enough. It's in a metal box, I don't know what's inside the box. What Jamie seemed to be saying is that there's some kind of feedback loop that might make the motor very voltage-sensitive, that he said would apply to a fan motor. This isn't a fan, it's an air turbine. In any case, this is what I have, and what I'd like to get running more evenly. It's not like there are a huge variety of airline respirators on the market. I'm not sure if the very expensive NIOSH-certified ones have more sophisticated motor control or not. I somewhat doubt it - I called one company and he said the innards were about the same for his NIOSH-certified version vs the home use version. These airline respirators are used by auto body workers or hobbyists, sandblasters, etc. Precise volume control might not be necessary for them. The voltage at an outlet does seem to vary more than the utility co. voltage, so I may have electrical problems that can be fixed and would give more even airflow. Laura How close to maximum speed are you running the motor? If somewhere around 1/2 then there are pretty simple circuits that use feedback from the motor to regulate speed. I could email you a schematic of one. But a universal motor is a bad choice for this application. Cheap though. Another solution may be a CPAP machine. They are for forcing air down a snoring person's nasal passages to keep them breathing and stop the snoring. These devices are similar to your machine but have much better air pressure regulation and are quieter. I don't know if they put out as much air as you need because they are made for sleeping people but the one I have is adjustable to pretty high pressure and volume. They are available used for pretty cheap. Call a local Senior Center. The one I use is over 6 years old and still works great, especially considering it gets used every night. Eric |
#45
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If it's a universal motor, it will run on DC, right?
So... How about using Zener diodes to regulate the voltage? Cheap and simple -- in theory. |
#46
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Laurav wrote:
On Jun 16, 1:33 pm, Jamie t wrote: The only way to properly regulate that is to measure the air mass flow and use that as the feed back. I suggested that to the guy who makes them. It would be great if you could set 5 CFM on the dial and be done with it. Roughly how much more expensive would that be? The web link you gave for the brushless DC motor is $1300. He charges $250 for this motor. RPM's is going to vary to maintain flow. Not much in my experience, I'm adjusting the rheostat manually and if I were standing by it, I could adjust the flow well enough. You seem to think what you have is some high volume unit? No, it's a low volume of air. However it pushes the air at high pressure, because it has to go through many feet of hose. He said it has high static pressure. Do you know how that changes the controller picture? Seeing that this is a medical device you have It's an industrial safety device actually. You need to keep an eye on the brushes! They don't last like you think they should. Yes, the brushes have worn out twice on me already. The motor just quits without warning ![]() an idea though - if you open the motor housing, is it easy to tell how worn the brushes are? Laura Yes, you can inspect the brushes. Normally they should still have enough on them to have a good spring holding tension against the commutator.. Many of them put a mark on the side of the brush or crimp something on the lead wire to indicate when they should be changed. Also, if you have gone through that many brushes already, it's a good chance the commutator is close to its life cycle. You need to inspect it for uneven surface wear which may include deep grooves. Jamie |
#47
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 17, 11:24*am, wrote:
How close to maximum speed are you running the motor? Much less than 1/2 max speed, I think. I measured the voltage the rheostat is outputting at my usual setting, and I was surprised to see it was 104 V, with ~ 120 V input. Ideally I'd have an inline sensor to measure air speed in the hose, and if the air speed is outside a preset range, the sensor would raise or lower the voltage. Another solution may be a CPAP machine. An airline respirator has a powerful motor for pushing air through a long length of hose, unlike a CPAP machine. Laura |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sorta OT, input voltage for LED light source question | Metalworking | |||
Voltage output over time.... | Electronics | |||
Voltage input question | Electronics | |||
digital voltage output | Electronics | |||
Audio Voltage Output | Electronics |