Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Variation in usable capacitor ratings?
Hi everyone,
I've been upgrading a simple power supply in a satellite receiver using a kit provided by a company selling spares. I've noticed that there's quite a bit of difference between the original capacitor values and the upgraded replacements provided, for instance Old New 47uF, 35V 100uF, 35V 2200uF, 10V 2200uF, 16V 330uF, 16V 470uF, 35 etc My querstion is: do the upgraded capacitors only work together as a set or can any one of them be replaced with the upgraded value? In the latter case, a follow-up quesion would be how much variation in capacitor value is permissible (presumably as long as it's higher)? |
#2
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Variation in usable capacitor ratings?
I would personally replace all of them as a kit especially if they are being
used as timing or wave shaping. The higher capacitance rating when being used as a filter is going to remove more ripple. "Art Deco" wrote in message ... Hi everyone, I've been upgrading a simple power supply in a satellite receiver using a kit provided by a company selling spares. I've noticed that there's quite a bit of difference between the original capacitor values and the upgraded replacements provided, for instance Old New 47uF, 35V 100uF, 35V 2200uF, 10V 2200uF, 16V 330uF, 16V 470uF, 35 etc My querstion is: do the upgraded capacitors only work together as a set or can any one of them be replaced with the upgraded value? In the latter case, a follow-up quesion would be how much variation in capacitor value is permissible (presumably as long as it's higher)? |
#3
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Variation in usable capacitor ratings?
If I were doing it I would replace all as a set especially if they are being
used as wave shaping or timing caps. As a DC filter any capacitance increase will usually remove more riple. "Art Deco" wrote in message ... Hi everyone, I've been upgrading a simple power supply in a satellite receiver using a kit provided by a company selling spares. I've noticed that there's quite a bit of difference between the original capacitor values and the upgraded replacements provided, for instance Old New 47uF, 35V 100uF, 35V 2200uF, 10V 2200uF, 16V 330uF, 16V 470uF, 35 etc My querstion is: do the upgraded capacitors only work together as a set or can any one of them be replaced with the upgraded value? In the latter case, a follow-up quesion would be how much variation in capacitor value is permissible (presumably as long as it's higher)? |
#4
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Variation in usable capacitor ratings?
Art Deco wrote: Hi everyone, I've been upgrading a simple power supply in a satellite receiver using a kit provided by a company selling spares. I've noticed that there's quite a bit of difference between the original capacitor values and the upgraded replacements provided, for instance Old New 47uF, 35V 100uF, 35V 2200uF, 10V 2200uF, 16V 330uF, 16V 470uF, 35 etc My querstion is: do the upgraded capacitors only work together as a set or can any one of them be replaced with the upgraded value? In any combination you like. In the latter case, a follow-up quesion would be how much variation in capacitor value is permissible (presumably as long as it's higher)? It's just a *maximum* voltage. Graham |
#5
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Variation in usable capacitor ratings?
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:53:37 +0100, Eeyore
wrote: Art Deco wrote: Hi everyone, I've been upgrading a simple power supply in a satellite receiver using a kit provided by a company selling spares. I've noticed that there's quite a bit of difference between the original capacitor values and the upgraded replacements provided, for instance Old New 47uF, 35V 100uF, 35V 2200uF, 10V 2200uF, 16V 330uF, 16V 470uF, 35 etc My querstion is: do the upgraded capacitors only work together as a set or can any one of them be replaced with the upgraded value? In any combination you like. OK, thanks. In the latter case, a follow-up quesion would be how much variation in capacitor value is permissible (presumably as long as it's higher)? It's just a *maximum* voltage. So in the third example above, where a 330uF 16V cap is replaced with a 470uF, 35V cap, it wouldn't be advisable to exceed 35V for the replacement? |
#6
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Variation in usable capacitor ratings?
if there are switching supplies involved make the replacements are rated for switching service or low/very low ESR If I were doing it I would replace all as a set especially if they are being used as wave shaping or timing caps. As a DC filter any capacitance increase will usually remove more riple. "Art Deco" wrote in message ... Hi everyone, I've been upgrading a simple power supply in a satellite receiver using a kit provided by a company selling spares. I've noticed that there's quite a bit of difference between the original capacitor values and the upgraded replacements provided, for instance Old New 47uF, 35V 100uF, 35V 2200uF, 10V 2200uF, 16V 330uF, 16V 470uF, 35 etc My querstion is: do the upgraded capacitors only work together as a set or can any one of them be replaced with the upgraded value? In the latter case, a follow-up quesion would be how much variation in capacitor value is permissible (presumably as long as it's higher)? |
#7
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Variation in usable capacitor ratings?
Art Deco wrote:
Hi everyone, I've been upgrading a simple power supply in a satellite receiver using a kit provided by a company selling spares. I've noticed that there's quite a bit of difference between the original capacitor values and the upgraded replacements provided, for instance Old New 47uF, 35V 100uF, 35V 2200uF, 10V 2200uF, 16V 330uF, 16V 470uF, 35 etc My querstion is: do the upgraded capacitors only work together as a set or can any one of them be replaced with the upgraded value? In the latter case, a follow-up quesion would be how much variation in capacitor value is permissible (presumably as long as it's higher)? These largish value caps are usually used for smoothing and decoupling, where values a bit bigger are a non issue. The voltage rating is the max V the cap is rated to work with, so again replacing with the next voltage up is a non issue. NT |
#8
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Variation in usable capacitor ratings?
Art Deco wrote: On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:53:37 +0100, Eeyore wrote: Art Deco wrote: Hi everyone, I've been upgrading a simple power supply in a satellite receiver using a kit provided by a company selling spares. I've noticed that there's quite a bit of difference between the original capacitor values and the upgraded replacements provided, for instance Old New 47uF, 35V 100uF, 35V 2200uF, 10V 2200uF, 16V 330uF, 16V 470uF, 35 etc My querstion is: do the upgraded capacitors only work together as a set or can any one of them be replaced with the upgraded value? In any combination you like. OK, thanks. In the latter case, a follow-up quesion would be how much variation in capacitor value is permissible (presumably as long as it's higher)? It's just a *maximum* voltage. So in the third example above, where a 330uF 16V cap is replaced with a 470uF, 35V cap, it wouldn't be advisable to exceed 35V for the replacement? It's not going to exceed 35V is it ? The voltage must be under 16V or the original cap wouldn't have been suitable. Graham |
#9
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Variation in usable capacitor ratings?
Meat Plow wrote: On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:50:51 +0100, Art Deco Has Frothed: Hi everyone, I've been upgrading a simple power supply in a satellite receiver using a kit provided by a company selling spares. I've noticed that there's quite a bit of difference between the original capacitor values and the upgraded replacements provided, for instance Old New 47uF, 35V 100uF, 35V 2200uF, 10V 2200uF, 16V 330uF, 16V 470uF, 35 etc My querstion is: do the upgraded capacitors only work together as a set or can any one of them be replaced with the upgraded value? Either or. In the latter case, a follow-up quesion would be how much variation in capacitor value is permissible (presumably as long as it's higher)? I always opt for a higher max voltage if available. The capacitive value depends on what the cap does. Electrolytics usually can be subbed by higher values maybe 20% higher without side effects. Why do you have this idea about 20% ? Any voltage higher than that required is just fine, although it would be silly to take it to extremes. Graham |
#10
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Variation in usable capacitor ratings?
"Meat Plow" wrote in message news On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:50:51 +0100, Art Deco Has Frothed: Hi everyone, I've been upgrading a simple power supply in a satellite receiver using a kit provided by a company selling spares. I've noticed that there's quite a bit of difference between the original capacitor values and the upgraded replacements provided, for instance Old New 47uF, 35V 100uF, 35V 2200uF, 10V 2200uF, 16V 330uF, 16V 470uF, 35 etc My querstion is: do the upgraded capacitors only work together as a set or can any one of them be replaced with the upgraded value? Either or. In the latter case, a follow-up quesion would be how much variation in capacitor value is permissible (presumably as long as it's higher)? I always opt for a higher max voltage if available. The capacitive value depends on what the cap does. Electrolytics usually can be subbed by higher values maybe 20% higher without side effects. They are a bit better these days, but the capacitance value tolerance on electrolytics used to be +80% / -20%. An increased voltage rating, within reason, is of little consequece, provided the part is still of a suitable physical size to fit where it has got to go. Going up too far on the voltage, can alter other characteristics of the cap, such as its ESR, which may or may not be a problem, depending on the cap's function. For caps used as filters in switch mode or linear power supplies, an increase in value is often beneficial to the filtering function, but if you go too far, then the initial charging current from cold, may prove too much for some prior component, such as a diode or regulator transistor. As Meaty-boy says, going up 20% on the nominal value will not present a problem, and the values supplied in the kit should be just fine. Arfa |
#11
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Variation in usable capacitor ratings?
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:56:49 +0100, Eeyore
wrote: Art Deco wrote: On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:53:37 +0100, Eeyore wrote: Art Deco wrote: Hi everyone, I've been upgrading a simple power supply in a satellite receiver using a kit provided by a company selling spares. I've noticed that there's quite a bit of difference between the original capacitor values and the upgraded replacements provided, for instance Old New 47uF, 35V 100uF, 35V 2200uF, 10V 2200uF, 16V 330uF, 16V 470uF, 35 etc My querstion is: do the upgraded capacitors only work together as a set or can any one of them be replaced with the upgraded value? In any combination you like. OK, thanks. In the latter case, a follow-up quesion would be how much variation in capacitor value is permissible (presumably as long as it's higher)? It's just a *maximum* voltage. So in the third example above, where a 330uF 16V cap is replaced with a 470uF, 35V cap, it wouldn't be advisable to exceed 35V for the replacement? It's not going to exceed 35V is it ? The voltage must be under 16V or the original cap wouldn't have been suitable. I meant the voltage rating of the replacement capacitor. Would it make a difference here if a 470uF 50V capacitor was used? |
#12
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Variation in usable capacitor ratings?
|
#13
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Variation in usable capacitor ratings?
"Art Deco" wrote in message ... On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:56:49 +0100, Eeyore wrote: Art Deco wrote: On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:53:37 +0100, Eeyore wrote: Art Deco wrote: Hi everyone, I've been upgrading a simple power supply in a satellite receiver using a kit provided by a company selling spares. I've noticed that there's quite a bit of difference between the original capacitor values and the upgraded replacements provided, for instance Old New 47uF, 35V 100uF, 35V 2200uF, 10V 2200uF, 16V 330uF, 16V 470uF, 35 etc My querstion is: do the upgraded capacitors only work together as a set or can any one of them be replaced with the upgraded value? In any combination you like. OK, thanks. In the latter case, a follow-up quesion would be how much variation in capacitor value is permissible (presumably as long as it's higher)? It's just a *maximum* voltage. So in the third example above, where a 330uF 16V cap is replaced with a 470uF, 35V cap, it wouldn't be advisable to exceed 35V for the replacement? It's not going to exceed 35V is it ? The voltage must be under 16V or the original cap wouldn't have been suitable. I meant the voltage rating of the replacement capacitor. Would it make a difference here if a 470uF 50V capacitor was used? Almost certainly not, provided it fitted the board ok. But note that if it's much bigger than the original part, that might bring it closer to some item that runs hot, and this will shorten the life of the replacement by a considerable factor... Arfa |
#14
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Variation in usable capacitor ratings?
In power supplies the capacitance values are usually not critical, so
anything up to 3 times the value is probably okay, actually, a good thing. The voltage rating can also be higher, up to 3 times higher is perfectly okay. If you go above that, there's a chance the capacitor will over time lose part of it's dielectric thickness, which will increase the capacitance, which is harmless in 98% of the cases. |
#15
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Variation in usable capacitor ratings?
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 06:20:26 +0100, Art Deco put
finger to keyboard and composed: On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:56:49 +0100, Eeyore wrote: Art Deco wrote: On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:53:37 +0100, Eeyore wrote: Art Deco wrote: Hi everyone, I've been upgrading a simple power supply in a satellite receiver using a kit provided by a company selling spares. I've noticed that there's quite a bit of difference between the original capacitor values and the upgraded replacements provided, for instance Old New 47uF, 35V 100uF, 35V 2200uF, 10V 2200uF, 16V 330uF, 16V 470uF, 35 etc My querstion is: do the upgraded capacitors only work together as a set or can any one of them be replaced with the upgraded value? In any combination you like. OK, thanks. In the latter case, a follow-up quesion would be how much variation in capacitor value is permissible (presumably as long as it's higher)? It's just a *maximum* voltage. So in the third example above, where a 330uF 16V cap is replaced with a 470uF, 35V cap, it wouldn't be advisable to exceed 35V for the replacement? It's not going to exceed 35V is it ? The voltage must be under 16V or the original cap wouldn't have been suitable. I meant the voltage rating of the replacement capacitor. Would it make a difference here if a 470uF 50V capacitor was used? The only things I would be concerned about would be whether the higher voltage types had higher leakage, which *may* effect some timing applications, or whether the higher voltage types had higher ESR values, which would result in poorer performance in switchmode supply applications (as stated elsewhere in this thread). - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tek 465 trace brightness variation during sweep | Electronics Repair | |||
Color variation with Honduran Mahogany | Woodworking | |||
moldy apple wood, usable? | Woodworking | |||
Another variation on hourly rates | UK diy | |||
(another variation on) soundproofing party wall | UK diy |