Power resistor or voltage regulator?
Anyone a simple diagram?(if i need one)
Draw is about 1A but i would like to have some tolerance.

Bart Bervoets

Looks like i have to answer my own question again, but this is something the
entire group can use.
Some cool stuff the
http://www.uoguelph.ca/~antoon/circ/circuits.htm

Bart Bervoets

"Bart Bervoets" wrote in message
...
Power resistor or voltage regulator?
Anyone a simple diagram?(if i need one)
Draw is about 1A but i would like to have some tolerance.

Bart Bervoets

"Bart Bervoets" wrote in
:


"Bart Bervoets" wrote in message
.. .
Power resistor or voltage regulator?
Anyone a simple diagram?(if i need one)
Draw is about 1A but i would like to have some tolerance.

Looks like i have to answer my own question again, but this is
something the entire group can use.
Some cool stuff the
http://www.uoguelph.ca/~antoon/circ/circuits.htm

Bart Bervoets

a pretty good site (but everyone here has probably seen it before).
A resistor would work if the current draw is fairly constant, but 3
terminal voltage regulator (LM7809 eg.) is better. circuit is regulator and
wire...

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"me" wrote in message
...
"Bart Bervoets" wrote in
:

A resistor would work if the current draw is fairly constant, but 3
terminal voltage regulator (LM7809 eg.) is better. circuit is regulator
and
wire...

....and caps from input and output pins to ground pin to prevent
self-oscillation.

Dave

Bart Bervoets wrote:

Power resistor or voltage regulator?
Anyone a simple diagram?(if i need one)
Draw is about 1A but i would like to have some tolerance.

Bart Bervoets


This kind of question should be asked on: news:sci.electronics.basics


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

Bart Bervoets wrote:
Power resistor or voltage regulator?
Anyone a simple diagram?(if i need one)
Draw is about 1A but i would like to have some tolerance.

Bart Bervoets




Use a 7809 regulator, a resistor will only work if the device has a
constrant draw and the voltage in is constant, which is almost never the
case.

In article ,
Bart Bervoets wrote:
Power resistor or voltage regulator?
Anyone a simple diagram?(if i need one)
Draw is about 1A but i would like to have some tolerance.

Regulator. Probably something like an L78S09CV which is a 2 amp type. Do a
search on it and you'll find a data sheet which will give the circuit
diagram. Additional components are two electrolytics, two disc capacitors
and a couple of diodes for extra protection.

--
*What hair colour do they put on the driver's license of a bald man? *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...
Bart Bervoets wrote:

Power resistor or voltage regulator?
Anyone a simple diagram?(if i need one)
Draw is about 1A but i would like to have some tolerance.

Bart Bervoets


This kind of question should be asked on: news:sci.electronics.basics


Michael
I don't wish to get into another of those push and shove contests that I had
with you last year, but would you care to tell us all why the poster *
should *, in your opinion, have asked his question elsewhere ? Yes, it is a
basic question, and yes, the group that you cite would be a valid place to
ask that question, but no more so than here. This person regularly posts on
this group, and I see no problem with his asking this question here. He has
received a number of valid replies, and no one bar you, is objecting to the
simple nature of the question.

Maybe it's your military bearing that makes you prone to giving out with
these bluff statements. It might have been more appropriate to have made
your comment along the lines of " this question * could also * be asked on
blah blah blah, just so that posters know that such a place exists.

A couple of weeks ago, a person posted a warning to this group, saying that
anyone who asks a naiive question on here was likely to be attacked as a
fool. I went to great lengths to defend the people who regularly post help
on here, saying that many such questions were posed, and with the exception
of those where the poster seemed to be implying that he was trying to work
with dangerous kit without the necessary safety knowledge, replies would be
polite and helpful. Your telling Bart that he should be posting elsewhere,
implying that his question is too simple for the likes of this group, flies
in the face of that.

It may be that you have no intention of sounding "superior", but if that is
the case, may I respectfully request that you remember that this is an
international group, and the "bold American way" may not always come over in
other parts of the world, as sounding very polite.

Arfa

Arfa Daily wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...
Bart Bervoets wrote:

Power resistor or voltage regulator?
Anyone a simple diagram?(if i need one)
Draw is about 1A but i would like to have some tolerance.

Bart Bervoets


This kind of question should be asked on: news:sci.electronics.basics


Michael
I don't wish to get into another of those push and shove contests that I had
with you last year, but would you care to tell us all why the poster *
should *, in your opinion, have asked his question elsewhere ? Yes, it is a
basic question, and yes, the group that you cite would be a valid place to
ask that question, but no more so than here. This person regularly posts on
this group, and I see no problem with his asking this question here. He has
received a number of valid replies, and no one bar you, is objecting to the
simple nature of the question.


I pointed out the other group, becasue they are less likely to be
abused there, and there a lot of EEs who are willing to draw up simple
schematics to explain things. That is what the group was created for.
I don't object to it being asked here, but the OP might find more or
diffferent help there, as well as meet others who are wanting to learn
more about electronics.


Maybe it's your military bearing that makes you prone to giving out with
these bluff statements. It might have been more appropriate to have made
your comment along the lines of " this question * could also * be asked on
blah blah blah, just so that posters know that such a place exists.

A couple of weeks ago, a person posted a warning to this group, saying that
anyone who asks a naiive question on here was likely to be attacked as a
fool. I went to great lengths to defend the people who regularly post help
on here, saying that many such questions were posed, and with the exception
of those where the poster seemed to be implying that he was trying to work
with dangerous kit without the necessary safety knowledge, replies would be
polite and helpful. Your telling Bart that he should be posting elsewhere,
implying that his question is too simple for the likes of this group, flies
in the face of that.


I tell some people who ask very basic questions on
news:sci.electronics.design the same thing, and for the same reasons.
Why go to a Chevy newsgroup to ask about Ford problems? Also, if
someone is using Google to look for information before they post, it
helps to have it all in one place.


It may be that you have no intention of sounding "superior", but if that is
the case, may I respectfully request that you remember that this is an
international group, and the "bold American way" may not always come over in
other parts of the world, as sounding very polite.

Arfa


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

A resistor is easiest if the supply voltage and current draw
are fairly constant. You didn't indicate what sort of
device you are trying to power; some are much more forgiving than others.

Voltage divided by Current = Resistance
(3 volt drop/1 ampere = 3 ohm resistor)
Current squared times resistance = power in watts
(1 x 1 x 3 = 3 Watt resistor - get a 5 watt for safety)
So you need a 3 ohm 5 watt resistor

Bart Bervoets wrote:
Power resistor or voltage regulator?
Anyone a simple diagram?(if i need one)
Draw is about 1A but i would like to have some tolerance.

Bart Bervoets

are fairly constant. You didn't indicate what sort of
device you are trying to power; some are much more forgiving than others.

Creative labs pc speakers in my car.

So you need a 3 ohm 5 watt resistor

And for 2 amps?
I don't really understand your calculation as i am useless in math.

Bart Bervoets

"Bart Bervoets" wrote in message
...

are fairly constant. You didn't indicate what sort of
device you are trying to power; some are much more forgiving than others.

Creative labs pc speakers in my car.

So you need a 3 ohm 5 watt resistor

And for 2 amps?
I don't really understand your calculation as i am useless in math.

Forget it, a resistor is useless for your application. You'll need to build
a decent voltage regulator circuit to power such gear if you want it to
work well.

You may find the speakers work just fine at 12V ( or more like 13.8V or
higher if we're discussing a car's power supply), it's up to you whether you
want to risk finding out!

Dave

This kind of question should be asked on: news:sci.electronics.basics




I pointed out the other group, becasue they are less likely to be
abused there, and there a lot of EEs who are willing to draw up simple
schematics to explain things. That is what the group was created for.
I don't object to it being asked here, but the OP might find more or
diffferent help there, as well as meet others who are wanting to learn
more about electronics.




I tell some people who ask very basic questions on
news:sci.electronics.design the same thing, and for the same reasons.
Why go to a Chevy newsgroup to ask about Ford problems? Also, if
someone is using Google to look for information before they post, it
helps to have it all in one place.



OK Michael, all fair enough comment. Sorry, I'm probably being a bit
sensitive about your American way of saying things. It was just that it
sounded a bit dismissive to the guy, who is, after all, a regular poster
here. Thanks for the polite reply. Appreciated.

Arfa

Arfa Daily wrote:

This kind of question should be asked on: news:sci.electronics.basics




I pointed out the other group, becasue they are less likely to be
abused there, and there a lot of EEs who are willing to draw up simple
schematics to explain things. That is what the group was created for.
I don't object to it being asked here, but the OP might find more or
diffferent help there, as well as meet others who are wanting to learn
more about electronics.




I tell some people who ask very basic questions on
news:sci.electronics.design the same thing, and for the same reasons.
Why go to a Chevy newsgroup to ask about Ford problems? Also, if
someone is using Google to look for information before they post, it
helps to have it all in one place.



OK Michael, all fair enough comment. Sorry, I'm probably being a bit
sensitive about your American way of saying things. It was just that it
sounded a bit dismissive to the guy, who is, after all, a regular poster
here. Thanks for the polite reply. Appreciated.

Arfa


I also point people here when they ask repair questions on the other
sci.electronics groups to make sure they find the help they need. Its
not to say the OP couldn't get help here, but its not something normally
dealt with here. My replies are rather short at times, because of pain
in my hands prevent me from doing a lot of typing.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...

I also point people here when they ask repair questions on the other
sci.electronics groups to make sure they find the help they need. Its
not to say the OP couldn't get help here, but its not something normally
dealt with here. My replies are rather short at times, because of pain
in my hands prevent me from doing a lot of typing.

Aw c'mon, admit it, you're just a crotchety old fart...

Seriously, how are you doing lately? Are you still in the Ocala area?

Leonard

Leonard Caillouet wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...

I also point people here when they ask repair questions on the other
sci.electronics groups to make sure they find the help they need. Its
not to say the OP couldn't get help here, but its not something normally
dealt with here. My replies are rather short at times, because of pain
in my hands prevent me from doing a lot of typing.

Aw c'mon, admit it, you're just a crotchety old fart...

Seriously, how are you doing lately? Are you still in the Ocala area?

Leonard


You're just jealous because you have to behave in front of your
customers. ;-)

Not too well. I can't get my blood sugar back down this time, and
the prescription pain killers no longer work at all. Yes, I'm still in
the Ocala area. How is your CET coming along? I don't get on here too
often anymore and I may have missed something.

--
My sig file can beat up your sig file!

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...
Leonard Caillouet wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...

I also point people here when they ask repair questions on the other
sci.electronics groups to make sure they find the help they need. Its
not to say the OP couldn't get help here, but its not something
normally
dealt with here. My replies are rather short at times, because of pain
in my hands prevent me from doing a lot of typing.

Aw c'mon, admit it, you're just a crotchety old fart...

Seriously, how are you doing lately? Are you still in the Ocala area?

Leonard


You're just jealous because you have to behave in front of your
customers. ;-)

Not too well. I can't get my blood sugar back down this time, and
the prescription pain killers no longer work at all. Yes, I'm still in
the Ocala area. How is your CET coming along? I don't get on here too
often anymore and I may have missed something.

Have not had time to even bother with the CET. Been busy with work and the
kids. Keeping good help is nearly impossible. Getting a bit crotchety
myself, maybe. Or just less tolerant of stupid. Be well. Be in touch.
Give me a call at the shop sometime.

Leonard

Leonard Caillouet wrote:

Have not had time to even bother with the CET. Been busy with work and the
kids. Keeping good help is nearly impossible. Getting a bit crotchety
myself, maybe. Or just less tolerant of stupid. Be well. Be in touch.
Give me a call at the shop sometime.


I know all too well how you feel about stupid. I see more than my
fair share, too.

I don't have long distance service, but I'll try to call you the next
time I'm at the VA hospital for tests. Probably a couple months before
they find a reason to send me back to Gainesville.

BTW, my Email address is good.


--
My sig file can beat up your sig file!

"Arfa Daily" ) writes:
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...
Bart Bervoets wrote:

Power resistor or voltage regulator?
Anyone a simple diagram?(if i need one)
Draw is about 1A but i would like to have some tolerance.

Bart Bervoets


This kind of question should be asked on: news:sci.electronics.basics


Michael
I don't wish to get into another of those push and shove contests that I had
with you last year, but would you care to tell us all why the poster *
should *, in your opinion, have asked his question elsewhere ? Yes, it is a
basic question, and yes, the group that you cite would be a valid place to
ask that question, but no more so than here. This person regularly posts on
this group, and I see no problem with his asking this question here. He has
received a number of valid replies, and no one bar you, is objecting to the
simple nature of the question.

I can remember when sci.electronics was the newsgroup, with only
sci.electronics.repair as a separate group. I don't recall it being too busy,
but it was getting there, and some decided it was worth splitting, so they
went through the process, and it passed, so now we have a slew of newsgroups
instead of just sci.electronics

In other words, it was decided to break things down into more specific and
manageable sub-groups.

Once again, see Mark Zenier's guide to the hierarchy at
ftp://ftp.eskimo.com/u/m/mzenier/seguide9706.txt
Mark was one of the main people to take care of the process of
splitting sci.electronics, it was back in 1995 or maybe 96.

By your process, you might as well have One Big Newsgroup, so every one
sees everything that people are posting. The problem is that it would
be way too cumbersome, so instead we have all kinds of newsgroups that
are devoted to smaller and smaller specialties.

The notion that newsgroups are places where people "hang out" is a dangerous
one. Because once you start letting people ask off-topic questions simply
because they "know the other posters", then it's just a small leap until
all kinds of off-topic stuff is posted. Witness sci.electronics.design
where not only are there too many beginner's questions (and no, that's
not superiority, it's a case of the regulars there taking the questions too
literally and thus not supplying a proper answer to a beginner, and too
often we are seeing people posting there simply because it has more traffic
than the other newsgroups, which the split was about avoiding), but first we
had the weather reports and then the Girl Guide reports and then just about
anything goes. It's simply a case of some people deciding it's a hang out,
but instead of hanging out to discuss the topic at hand, they never go
anywhere else, instead discussing all their off-topic matters there, rather
than moving to a newsgroup where such discussions fit. There are plenty of
places where the other topics fit, and indeed there are plenty of newsgroups
where "community" fits, like all those local newsgroups. Don't ever forget
that these newsgroups travel the world, and for the rest of us, we
aren't interested in reading about politics or seeing ads or
some other location specific post that has little relevance to the rest
of us; if we wanted to read such things, we'd go to the appropriate
newsgroups. And that's no different from seeing someone asking about
building something in a repair newsgroup; some of us do happen to
read both newsgroups, but that is secondary to the fact that we are
reading each for two different purposes.

The same thing with the too common cross-posting, people shotgunning
their question around because they can't be bothered to find the most
appropriate newsgroup. It does not work in their favor, because people
like me do think carefully about replying to something cross-posted,
so the poster may not get an answer that they would have gotten if
they posted to the right newsgroup in the first place. And yes,
I will think twice about replying to a question in the wrong newsgroup,
and indeed from now on I will pay even more attention to this matter.
And so if I tell someone they should ask it elsewhere, that would
be the only way they'll get an answer from me, by moving to the right
newsgroup.

And sci.electronics.design is just a way station. I can recall when it
started heading that way, and I could point you to newsgroups where it
is far worse, where any time someone asks an on-topic question, it very
quickly dissolves into the handful of regulars talking among themselves,
too often in a competition to see who can have the wittiest comment. If
you think someone telling someone else to post somewhere else where it
is more appropriate is being "superior", then just wait till this newsgroup
devolves to the point where a handful of regulars have decided the newsgroup
is not what the charter says it's for, but for their own personal space.

I should point out that Michael is not imposing his will on this matter,
simply following how the sci.electronics.* hierarchy is supposed to work.
I should point out that Mark Zenier used to post the guidelines on a regular
basis, until someone gave him flack for it, at which point he stopped. Is
should point out that Clifton Sharpe used to make a point of pointing out
that ads didn't belong, and while I don't know if he lost interest or
felt driven off, but it's been some years since I can recall seeing a
post of his. I know I've pointed out quite blatant advertising or
off-topic posts sometimes over the years, but even though it does work,
because it helps to ensure that others don't follow the bad examples,
it's not something that gets rewarded, and it's easier to stop doing it
than continue. And then the newsgroups start sliding towards uselessness,
and by the time it becomes really blatant, it's too late because too many
of the good posters have left.

Michael

You may find the speakers work just fine at 12V ( or more like 13.8V or
higher if we're discussing a car's power supply), it's up to you whether
you want to risk finding out!

Rather not, i will build that litte circuit.
The transformer has 9V for a reason.

Bart Bervoets

In article ,
Bart Bervoets wrote:
You may find the speakers work just fine at 12V ( or more like 13.8V
or higher if we're discussing a car's power supply), it's up to you
whether you want to risk finding out!

Rather not, i will build that litte circuit.
The transformer has 9V for a reason.

You might check the open circuit or low drain actual voltage. Unless
regulated, these supply voltages tend to be nominal. ;-)

--
*Husbands should come with instructions

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

"Bart Bervoets" wrote in message
...

You may find the speakers work just fine at 12V ( or more like 13.8V or
higher if we're discussing a car's power supply), it's up to you whether
you want to risk finding out!

Rather not, i will build that litte circuit.
The transformer has 9V for a reason.

Bart Bervoets


Well, I thought you were wanting advice, but clearly you know what you're
doing so I'll let you get on with it!

OK, I'm kidding, but really, if you are so sure that the audio circuits in
question are not capable of running at 12V then surely you are up to
building a simple regulator circuit consisting of only three components?

I'll bet if you look at the datasheet for the audio IC in your equipment
you'll find it is designed for at least automotive voltages, and I'll bet
your Creative speakers use a circuit design fairly close to the
manufacturer's recommended circuit on the datasheet.

Also, as Dave Plowman rightly points out, the adapter that came with your
speakers will in all likelyhood be unregulated, and you'll probably find it
puts out well over 9V off load, maybe as high as 16V!

Dave

"Michael Black" wrote in message
...
"Arfa Daily" ) writes:
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
...
Bart Bervoets wrote:

Power resistor or voltage regulator?
Anyone a simple diagram?(if i need one)
Draw is about 1A but i would like to have some tolerance.

Bart Bervoets


This kind of question should be asked on: news:sci.electronics.basics


Michael
I don't wish to get into another of those push and shove contests that I
had
with you last year, but would you care to tell us all why the poster *
should *, in your opinion, have asked his question elsewhere ? Yes, it is
a
basic question, and yes, the group that you cite would be a valid place
to
ask that question, but no more so than here. This person regularly posts
on
this group, and I see no problem with his asking this question here. He
has
received a number of valid replies, and no one bar you, is objecting to
the
simple nature of the question.

I can remember when sci.electronics was the newsgroup, with only
sci.electronics.repair as a separate group. I don't recall it being too
busy,
but it was getting there, and some decided it was worth splitting, so they
went through the process, and it passed, so now we have a slew of
newsgroups
instead of just sci.electronics

In other words, it was decided to break things down into more specific and
manageable sub-groups.

Once again, see Mark Zenier's guide to the hierarchy at
ftp://ftp.eskimo.com/u/m/mzenier/seguide9706.txt
Mark was one of the main people to take care of the process of
splitting sci.electronics, it was back in 1995 or maybe 96.

By your process, you might as well have One Big Newsgroup, so every one
sees everything that people are posting. The problem is that it would
be way too cumbersome, so instead we have all kinds of newsgroups that
are devoted to smaller and smaller specialties.

The notion that newsgroups are places where people "hang out" is a
dangerous
one. Because once you start letting people ask off-topic questions simply
because they "know the other posters", then it's just a small leap until
all kinds of off-topic stuff is posted. Witness sci.electronics.design
where not only are there too many beginner's questions (and no, that's
not superiority, it's a case of the regulars there taking the questions
too
literally and thus not supplying a proper answer to a beginner, and too
often we are seeing people posting there simply because it has more
traffic
than the other newsgroups, which the split was about avoiding), but first
we
had the weather reports and then the Girl Guide reports and then just
about
anything goes. It's simply a case of some people deciding it's a hang
out,
but instead of hanging out to discuss the topic at hand, they never go
anywhere else, instead discussing all their off-topic matters there,
rather
than moving to a newsgroup where such discussions fit. There are plenty
of
places where the other topics fit, and indeed there are plenty of
newsgroups
where "community" fits, like all those local newsgroups. Don't ever
forget
that these newsgroups travel the world, and for the rest of us, we
aren't interested in reading about politics or seeing ads or
some other location specific post that has little relevance to the rest
of us; if we wanted to read such things, we'd go to the appropriate
newsgroups. And that's no different from seeing someone asking about
building something in a repair newsgroup; some of us do happen to
read both newsgroups, but that is secondary to the fact that we are
reading each for two different purposes.

The same thing with the too common cross-posting, people shotgunning
their question around because they can't be bothered to find the most
appropriate newsgroup. It does not work in their favor, because people
like me do think carefully about replying to something cross-posted,
so the poster may not get an answer that they would have gotten if
they posted to the right newsgroup in the first place. And yes,
I will think twice about replying to a question in the wrong newsgroup,
and indeed from now on I will pay even more attention to this matter.
And so if I tell someone they should ask it elsewhere, that would
be the only way they'll get an answer from me, by moving to the right
newsgroup.

And sci.electronics.design is just a way station. I can recall when it
started heading that way, and I could point you to newsgroups where it
is far worse, where any time someone asks an on-topic question, it very
quickly dissolves into the handful of regulars talking among themselves,
too often in a competition to see who can have the wittiest comment. If
you think someone telling someone else to post somewhere else where it
is more appropriate is being "superior", then just wait till this
newsgroup
devolves to the point where a handful of regulars have decided the
newsgroup
is not what the charter says it's for, but for their own personal space.

I should point out that Michael is not imposing his will on this matter,
simply following how the sci.electronics.* hierarchy is supposed to work.
I should point out that Mark Zenier used to post the guidelines on a
regular
basis, until someone gave him flack for it, at which point he stopped. Is
should point out that Clifton Sharpe used to make a point of pointing out
that ads didn't belong, and while I don't know if he lost interest or
felt driven off, but it's been some years since I can recall seeing a
post of his. I know I've pointed out quite blatant advertising or
off-topic posts sometimes over the years, but even though it does work,
because it helps to ensure that others don't follow the bad examples,
it's not something that gets rewarded, and it's easier to stop doing it
than continue. And then the newsgroups start sliding towards uselessness,
and by the time it becomes really blatant, it's too late because too many
of the good posters have left.

Michael


Hi Michael

I hear what you're saying, and you are of course right in the core concepts
of what you say. However, I think we have to be careful not too become too
pedantic about the whole thing. The internet, including Usenet, evolves like
everything else in the world, and the demographic of the users likewise
changes. What was a hard and fast ' rule ' a few years ago, may not
necessarily be quite so appropriate now. Although it's a bit of a
contradiction in terms, sometimes a degree of devolution is part of the
evolution process.

I would not condone lots of really off-topic posting on a group, but I
really don't think that *some* constitutes a big problem. We all do it from
time to time, and sometimes, some really interesting debates come out of it.
You could say that this is nothing to do with repairing equipment, and you
would be right, but it is about the repair community, who just occasionally,
do take an interest in things other than picking up a meter and a soldering
iron ...

I, and I'm sure most of the other regulars on here, don't object to
questions being asked that, whilst not being strictly to do with repair, are
never-the-less, electronics related. This is particularly so when the person
posing the question is himself, a regular poster. I have hung around this
group and others for a long time now, and I really can't say that I've seen
this one degenerating as a result of some postings that are not, strictly
speaking, charter specific. Rather, I think that in general, the group
thrives as a result of the diversity of people and their electronics-related
questions.

I wasn't actually implying that the other Michael was trying to " impose his
will " as you say, merely that the way he brought attention to the other
group to Bart, had a rather dismissive tone to it. OK, by your contention of
how Usenet heirarchy works, then perhaps the question should, strictly
speaking, have been posed on the 'basics' group, but I thought it was a bit
sharp and unfriendly-sounding, the way it was put to him, and by dint of the
way I see the group as having evolved, not necessarily a valid response, in
that manner. Hence the reason that I said that it may have been nicer to
point out the existence of the other group by saying "could also" rather
than "should". This would then leave it open to the poster, and other
lurkers, to determine for themselves whether they might be better off to
post similar future questions there rather than here.

It's all a case of being friendly to one another as an electronics community
really. Lets face it, there's enough hostility world-wide, as it is ...

Arfa

Bart Bervoets wrote:

are fairly constant. You didn't indicate what sort of
device you are trying to power; some are much more forgiving than others.


Creative labs pc speakers in my car.


So you need a 3 ohm 5 watt resistor


And for 2 amps?
I don't really understand your calculation as i am useless in math.

Bart Bervoets


because your required voltage is so close to the supply voltage,
there isn't much in the line for a common regulator circuit to
maintain a stable regulated 9 volts
don't get me wrong, you can make a PWM (pulsed width modulated)
unit to drive a power FET with a very low on resistance to give you
a nice regulated 9 volts.
you can find DC to DC converters online, you just need to know your
wattage/amp factor of the load.
or use a dual op-amp, MOS powerfet witha few minor components and
make your self a regulated PWM supply...


--
Real Programmers Do things like this.
http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5

"Jamie" t wrote in message
...
Bart Bervoets wrote:

are fairly constant. You didn't indicate what sort of
device you are trying to power; some are much more forgiving than others.


Creative labs pc speakers in my car.


So you need a 3 ohm 5 watt resistor


And for 2 amps?
I don't really understand your calculation as i am useless in math.

Bart Bervoets
because your required voltage is so close to the supply voltage,
there isn't much in the line for a common regulator circuit to
maintain a stable regulated 9 volts


That isn't strictly true. Most manufacturers quote the dropout voltage for
their range of standard 78XX regulators, to be 2v max. Even allowing for the
vehicle engine to be off, there is an overhead of 3v, and with the engine
running, asuming that the alternator is working correctly, there will be an
overhead of 4.8v ( 13.8v - 9v ) so he should be fine with a '7809,
providing he doesn't need more than an amp, although there are higher rated
devices available. The LM317K adjustable could be used. This can source
currents in excess of 1.5A and has a max dropout voltage of 2.5v.

Arfa

In article ,
Jamie t wrote:
because your required voltage is so close to the supply voltage,
there isn't much in the line for a common regulator circuit to
maintain a stable regulated 9 volts

The data sheet for the L78D09CV 2 amp regulator gives the input voltage as
12 to 35.

However, the app is for a car, where the running voltage is more like 14.

--
*If PROGRESS is for advancement, what does that make CONGRESS mean?

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.