Article on this famous UL test, now probably irrelevant due to
harmonisation with IEC.

Damn, too big again ( 1.26 MB )

Graham

On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:05:09 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:

Article on this famous UL test, now probably irrelevant due to
harmonisation with IEC.

Damn, too big again ( 1.26 MB )

Graham


You're an idiot if you have (keep) an ISP that limits the size of an
upload to Usenet.

Our company had to go to UL labs and teach them about HV testing.

Harmonization is correct, and is so for the greater part of those that
use Usenet. Your Olde English is just that... old. Outdated. Your
country should seriously consider catching up with the rest of the world,
instead of being bullheaded for the last 200 years since you got your
asses kicked out of our business.

Slow to change is quite indicative.

FatBytestard wrote:

On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:05:09 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:

Article on this famous UL test, now probably irrelevant due to
harmonisation with IEC.

Damn, too big again ( 1.26 MB )

Graham

You're an idiot if you have (keep) an ISP that limits the size of an
upload to Usenet.

It has NOTHING to do with my ISP which is superb.

Graham

On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:53:09 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:



FatBytestard wrote:

On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:05:09 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:

Article on this famous UL test, now probably irrelevant due to
harmonisation with IEC.

Damn, too big again ( 1.26 MB )

Graham

You're an idiot if you have (keep) an ISP that limits the size of an
upload to Usenet.

It has NOTHING to do with my ISP which is superb.

Graham

Ahhh. Then your inability to make a proper post to Usenet is firmly
rooted in your retarded choice of news client.

Do a little hunting, and you might find out what registry setting to
change to up that limit. D'OH!

FatBytestard wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:05:09 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:


Article on this famous UL test, now probably irrelevant due to
harmonisation with IEC.

Damn, too big again ( 1.26 MB )

Graham


Harmonization is correct, and is so for the greater part of those that
use Usenet. Your Olde English is just that... old. Outdated. Your
country should seriously consider catching up with the rest of the world,
instead of being bullheaded for the last 200 years since you got your
asses kicked out of our business.


That's rich from the country that still uses BTUs and all sorts of other ludicrous units.

On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:13:41 +0000, richard
wrote:

FatBytestard wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:05:09 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:


Article on this famous UL test, now probably irrelevant due to
harmonisation with IEC.

Damn, too big again ( 1.26 MB )

Graham


Harmonization is correct, and is so for the greater part of those that
use Usenet. Your Olde English is just that... old. Outdated. Your
country should seriously consider catching up with the rest of the world,
instead of being bullheaded for the last 200 years since you got your
asses kicked out of our business.


That's rich from the country that still uses BTUs and all sorts of other ludicrous units.


For air conditioning, yes. Why say the unit is ludicrous? It is a
BRITISH invention.

I think you might have it ass backwards. I am from the USA. We use all
different units. Don't let your bias bend your brain. Ooops... too late.

FatBytestard wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
FatBytestard wrote:
Eeyore wrote:

Article on this famous UL test, now probably irrelevant due to
harmonisation with IEC.

Damn, too big again ( 1.26 MB )

Graham

You're an idiot if you have (keep) an ISP that limits the size of an
upload to Usenet.

It has NOTHING to do with my ISP which is superb.

Graham

Ahhh. Then your inability to make a proper post to Usenet is firmly
rooted in your retarded choice of news client.

No, not that either AFAIK. Come on , try again.

Graham

FatBytestard wrote:

On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:13:41 +0000, richard
wrote:

FatBytestard wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:05:09 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:


Article on this famous UL test, now probably irrelevant due to
harmonisation with IEC.

Damn, too big again ( 1.26 MB )

Graham


Harmonization is correct, and is so for the greater part of those that
use Usenet. Your Olde English is just that... old. Outdated. Your
country should seriously consider catching up with the rest of the world,
instead of being bullheaded for the last 200 years since you got your
asses kicked out of our business.


That's rich from the country that still uses BTUs and all sorts of other ludicrous units.

For air conditioning, yes. Why say the unit is ludicrous? It is a
BRITISH invention.

I think you might have it ass backwards. I am from the USA. We use all
different units. Don't let your bias bend your brain. Ooops... too late.

So why are you using obsolete British units ?

Graham

On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 02:22:53 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:



FatBytestard wrote:

On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:13:41 +0000, richard
wrote:

FatBytestard wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:05:09 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:


Article on this famous UL test, now probably irrelevant due to
harmonisation with IEC.

Damn, too big again ( 1.26 MB )

Graham


Harmonization is correct, and is so for the greater part of those that
use Usenet. Your Olde English is just that... old. Outdated. Your
country should seriously consider catching up with the rest of the world,
instead of being bullheaded for the last 200 years since you got your
asses kicked out of our business.


That's rich from the country that still uses BTUs and all sorts of other ludicrous units.

For air conditioning, yes. Why say the unit is ludicrous? It is a
BRITISH invention.

I think you might have it ass backwards. I am from the USA. We use all
different units. Don't let your bias bend your brain. Ooops... too late.

So why are you using obsolete British units ?

---
For convenience, as bad as they may be, since that's we inherited.

We have entire industries using obsolete British units but, since
everyone knows that one BTU (British Thermal Unit) is defined as the
amount of heat required to raise the temperature of one pound of liquid
water by one degree from 60° to 61° Fahrenheit at a constant pressure of
one atmosphere, I don't see why that would present a problem to you
since converting to SI should be straightforward enough to cause you
little grief.

Interestingly, I see that you Brits, (your government, actually)
although claiming to, haven't quite embraced the concept of being part
of the "United States of Europe" and, consequently, haven't embraced the
"Euro" as your standard of currency, so you're not quite decimal yet.

Why are you holding out?

JF

On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:57:27 -0500, John Fields
wrote:

On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 02:22:53 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:



FatBytestard wrote:

On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:13:41 +0000, richard
wrote:

FatBytestard wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:05:09 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:


Article on this famous UL test, now probably irrelevant due to
harmonisation with IEC.

Damn, too big again ( 1.26 MB )

Graham


Harmonization is correct, and is so for the greater part of those that
use Usenet. Your Olde English is just that... old. Outdated. Your
country should seriously consider catching up with the rest of the world,
instead of being bullheaded for the last 200 years since you got your
asses kicked out of our business.


That's rich from the country that still uses BTUs and all sorts of other ludicrous units.

For air conditioning, yes. Why say the unit is ludicrous? It is a
BRITISH invention.

I think you might have it ass backwards. I am from the USA. We use all
different units. Don't let your bias bend your brain. Ooops... too late.

So why are you using obsolete British units ?

---
For convenience, as bad as they may be, since that's we inherited.

We have entire industries using obsolete British units but, since
everyone knows that one BTU (British Thermal Unit) is defined as the
amount of heat required to raise the temperature of one pound of liquid
water by one degree from 60° to 61° Fahrenheit at a constant pressure of
one atmosphere, I don't see why that would present a problem to you
since converting to SI should be straightforward enough to cause you
little grief.

Interestingly, I see that you Brits, (your government, actually)
although claiming to, haven't quite embraced the concept of being part
of the "United States of Europe" and, consequently, haven't embraced the
"Euro" as your standard of currency, so you're not quite decimal yet.

Why are you holding out?

JF

He's not finished ****ing in his hands ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

It's what you learn, after you know it all, that counts.

"Eeyore" wrote in message
...


FatBytestard wrote:

On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:13:41 +0000, richard
wrote:

FatBytestard wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:05:09 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:


Article on this famous UL test, now probably irrelevant due to
harmonisation with IEC.

Damn, too big again ( 1.26 MB )

Graham


Harmonization is correct, and is so for the greater part of those
that
use Usenet. Your Olde English is just that... old. Outdated. Your
country should seriously consider catching up with the rest of the
world,
instead of being bullheaded for the last 200 years since you got your
asses kicked out of our business.


That's rich from the country that still uses BTUs and all sorts of other
ludicrous units.

For air conditioning, yes. Why say the unit is ludicrous? It is a
BRITISH invention.

I think you might have it ass backwards. I am from the USA. We use all
different units. Don't let your bias bend your brain. Ooops... too late.

So why are you using obsolete British units ?

Graham

United Kingdom (only has a Queen) uses LITRES of fuel to drive Japanese cars
MILES and miles????

John G.

On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 02:22:53 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:



FatBytestard wrote:

On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:13:41 +0000, richard
wrote:

FatBytestard wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:05:09 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:


Article on this famous UL test, now probably irrelevant due to
harmonisation with IEC.

Damn, too big again ( 1.26 MB )

Graham


Harmonization is correct, and is so for the greater part of those that
use Usenet. Your Olde English is just that... old. Outdated. Your
country should seriously consider catching up with the rest of the world,
instead of being bullheaded for the last 200 years since you got your
asses kicked out of our business.


That's rich from the country that still uses BTUs and all sorts of other ludicrous units.

For air conditioning, yes. Why say the unit is ludicrous? It is a
BRITISH invention.

I think you might have it ass backwards. I am from the USA. We use all
different units. Don't let your bias bend your brain. Ooops... too late.

So why are you using obsolete British units ?

Graham

There is a difference between obsolete and 'out of use'.

A difference you obviously have no grasp of.

There is also a difference between out of use and archaic.

Can you guess what category BTUs really falls into? I have my doubts.

FatBytestard wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:13:41 +0000, richard
wrote:


FatBytestard wrote:

On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:05:09 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:



Article on this famous UL test, now probably irrelevant due to
harmonisation with IEC.

Damn, too big again ( 1.26 MB )

Graham

Harmonization is correct, and is so for the greater part of those that
use Usenet. Your Olde English is just that... old. Outdated. Your
country should seriously consider catching up with the rest of the world,
instead of being bullheaded for the last 200 years since you got your
asses kicked out of our business.


That's rich from the country that still uses BTUs and all sorts of other ludicrous units.



For air conditioning, yes. Why say the unit is ludicrous? It is a
BRITISH invention.

I think you might have it ass backwards. I am from the USA. We use all
different units. Don't let your bias bend your brain. Ooops... too late.

So you still use pounds and degrees fahrenheit - not to mention 16 oz pints.
You're the ones (to quote your words) who are seriously outdated - and who have everything "arse about face".
Hell, even one of your space probes failed because the lockheed engineers used poundals or some such obsolete abomination -
maybe a slug - lol

On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:16:02 +0000, richard
wrote:

FatBytestard wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:13:41 +0000, richard
wrote:


FatBytestard wrote:

On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:05:09 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:



Article on this famous UL test, now probably irrelevant due to
harmonisation with IEC.

Damn, too big again ( 1.26 MB )

Graham

Harmonization is correct, and is so for the greater part of those that
use Usenet. Your Olde English is just that... old. Outdated. Your
country should seriously consider catching up with the rest of the world,
instead of being bullheaded for the last 200 years since you got your
asses kicked out of our business.


That's rich from the country that still uses BTUs and all sorts of other ludicrous units.



For air conditioning, yes. Why say the unit is ludicrous? It is a
BRITISH invention.

I think you might have it ass backwards. I am from the USA. We use all
different units. Don't let your bias bend your brain. Ooops... too late.

So you still use pounds and degrees fahrenheit - not to mention 16 oz pints.
You're the ones (to quote your words) who are seriously outdated - and who have everything "arse about face".
Hell, even one of your space probes failed because the lockheed engineers used poundals or some such obsolete abomination -
maybe a slug - lol


No, idiot. It failed because it used kilograms, and the technician
filled the tank with pounds, which meant that it got less than half of
what it needed. This only proves that conversion to another standard
means that mistakes WILL be made. Some can be costly. The one where God
only put 1 gram of brain matter in your skull was costly for you.

In the scientific communities (not that you would know what that word
means), we use all manner of quantifier. Degrees Fahrenheit are used
primarily by the lay person, because generations of folk are familiar
with it. I am sure, however, that "familiar" is another word you have
problems with understanding.

I am quite sure that many in your lands are quite glad that they are
familiar with the technologies that we allowed you to have to protect
yourselves from attackers over the decades.

I think you have serious problems being able to "see the big picture".

FatBytestard wrote:

richard wrote:

So you still use pounds and degrees fahrenheit - not to mention 16 oz pints.
You're the ones (to quote your words) who are seriously outdated - and who have everything "arse about face".
Hell, even one of your space probes failed because the lockheed engineers used poundals or some such obsolete abomination -
maybe a slug - lol

No, idiot. It failed because it used kilograms, and the technician
filled the tank with pounds, which meant that it got less than half of
what it needed. This only proves that conversion to another standard
means that mistakes WILL be made.

No, what it means is having 2 sets of units, one used by the entire world (except yourselves), the other in the USA causes
mistakes.

You need to move to using international units.

Graham

FatBytestard wrote:

Degrees Fahrenheit are used primarily by the lay person, because generations of folk are familiar
with it.

And you think Americans are so stupid, they incapable of adapting ( answer probably yes ).

A system that says water freezes at zero is certainly far more useful and sensible to me.

Graham

On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 03:04:23 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:



FatBytestard wrote:

richard wrote:

So you still use pounds and degrees fahrenheit - not to mention 16 oz pints.
You're the ones (to quote your words) who are seriously outdated - and who have everything "arse about face".
Hell, even one of your space probes failed because the lockheed engineers used poundals or some such obsolete abomination -
maybe a slug - lol

No, idiot. It failed because it used kilograms, and the technician
filled the tank with pounds, which meant that it got less than half of
what it needed. This only proves that conversion to another standard
means that mistakes WILL be made.

No, what it means is having 2 sets of units, one used by the entire world (except yourselves), the other in the USA causes
mistakes.

You need to move to using international units.


Read it again, idiot. What makes you think we haven't?

Kind of like folks that have real audio equipment, and you with that
CRAP you are trying to foist onto folks.

On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 03:06:17 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:



FatBytestard wrote:

Degrees Fahrenheit are used primarily by the lay person, because generations of folk are familiar
with it.

And you think Americans are so stupid,

No, dumbass. I think narrow minded dopes like you are so stupid.

they incapable of adapting ( answer probably yes ).

Try to speak English, idiot.

A system that says water freezes at zero is certainly far more useful and sensible to me.


Again, you entirely miss the big picture... obviously.

FatBytestard wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
FatBytestard wrote:
richard wrote:

So you still use pounds and degrees fahrenheit - not to mention 16 oz pints.
You're the ones (to quote your words) who are seriously outdated - and who have everything "arse about face".
Hell, even one of your space probes failed because the lockheed engineers used poundals or some such obsolete abomination -

maybe a slug - lol

No, idiot. It failed because it used kilograms, and the technician
filled the tank with pounds, which meant that it got less than half of
what it needed. This only proves that conversion to another standard
means that mistakes WILL be made.

No, what it means is having 2 sets of units, one used by the entire world (except yourselves), the other in the USA causes
mistakes.

You need to move to using international units.

Read it again, idiot. What makes you think we haven't?

The fact you use 'traditional' units all over the place.

We converted and have had no problems. In fact it makes learning science easier.

Graham

FatBytestard wrote:

Try to speak English, idiot.

I have no trouble with ENGLISH, after all I live in England. It's Americans who as ever have to be
awkward cussed buggers who think they know better than anyone else.

Graham

On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:40:42 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:



FatBytestard wrote:

Try to speak English, idiot.

I have no trouble with ENGLISH, after all I live in England. It's Americans who as ever have to be
awkward cussed buggers who think they know better than anyone else.

Graham


If you read your post, you will find that you do indeed have a problem
with the language you claim to know.

FatBytestard wrote:

I am quite sure that many in your lands are quite glad that they are
familiar with the technologies that we allowed you to have to protect
yourselves from attackers over the decades.

It seems that you learnt well from our torture chambers - and invented not a few methods yourselves - not that this will protect
you - in fact, rather the reverse, but that's what we came to expect from your brain dead former president.

On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:00:34 +0000, richard
wrote:

FatBytestard wrote:

I am quite sure that many in your lands are quite glad that they are
familiar with the technologies that we allowed you to have to protect
yourselves from attackers over the decades.

It seems that you learnt well from our torture chambers - and invented not a few methods yourselves - not that this will protect
you - in fact, rather the reverse, but that's what we came to expect from your brain dead former president.


You're about as retarded as it gets if you think he had anything to do
with the way the military apparatus functioned.

You're an even bigger retard if you think it will end.

'learnt' is not a word, you retarded twit.

FatBytestard wrote:
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:00:34 +0000, richard
wrote:


FatBytestard wrote:


I am quite sure that many in your lands are quite glad that they are
familiar with the technologies that we allowed you to have to protect
yourselves from attackers over the decades.

It seems that you learnt well from our torture chambers - and invented not a few methods yourselves - not that this will protect
you - in fact, rather the reverse, but that's what we came to expect from your brain dead former president.



You're about as retarded as it gets if you think he had anything to do
with the way the military apparatus functioned.

You're an even bigger retard if you think it will end.

'learnt' is not a word, you retarded twit.


It is you who is the stupid uneducated prick.
"Learnt" is in my Shorter Oxford Dictionary.

I attach a pin up for you which seems appropriate in the circumstances.

On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:11:21 +0000, richard
wrote:

FatBytestard wrote:
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:00:34 +0000, richard
wrote:


FatBytestard wrote:


I am quite sure that many in your lands are quite glad that they are
familiar with the technologies that we allowed you to have to protect
yourselves from attackers over the decades.

It seems that you learnt well from our torture chambers - and invented not a few methods yourselves - not that this will protect
you - in fact, rather the reverse, but that's what we came to expect from your brain dead former president.



You're about as retarded as it gets if you think he had anything to do
with the way the military apparatus functioned.

You're an even bigger retard if you think it will end.

'learnt' is not a word, you retarded twit.


It is you who is the stupid uneducated prick.
"Learnt" is in my Shorter Oxford Dictionary.

I attach a pin up for you which seems appropriate in the circumstances.


Nice photo edit, retard boy. Is that "apin-up" where you live?
Bwuahahahahahahaha! Your lameness quotient just went off the chart.

The original photo was "Paris, France", and "Paris Kentucky".

I wouldn't expect a retarded twit like you to get it, though.

"learnt" is not a word. At best, it is slang.

At best, you are a 20 IQ ditz.

FatBytestard wrote:

"learnt" is not a word. At best, it is slang.

It's correct English.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/learnt

Graham

On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:55:02 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:



FatBytestard wrote:

"learnt" is not a word. At best, it is slang.

It's correct English.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/learnt

Graham


Yeah right, and you dopey ****s also say "killt"?

No. Maybe "explodt"? No.

In other words, why an "intelligent nation" would embrace archaic words
that began as pure slang is quite indicative.

FatBytestard wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:11:21 +0000, richard
wrote:


FatBytestard wrote:

On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:00:34 +0000, richard
wrote:



FatBytestard wrote:



I am quite sure that many in your lands are quite glad that they are
familiar with the technologies that we allowed you to have to protect
yourselves from attackers over the decades.

It seems that you learnt well from our torture chambers - and invented not a few methods yourselves - not that this will protect
you - in fact, rather the reverse, but that's what we came to expect from your brain dead former president.



You're about as retarded as it gets if you think he had anything to do
with the way the military apparatus functioned.

You're an even bigger retard if you think it will end.

'learnt' is not a word, you retarded twit.


It is you who is the stupid uneducated prick.
"Learnt" is in my Shorter Oxford Dictionary.

I attach a pin up for you which seems appropriate in the circumstances.



Nice photo edit, retard boy. Is that "apin-up" where you live?
Bwuahahahahahahaha! Your lameness quotient just went off the chart.

The original photo was "Paris, France", and "Paris Kentucky".

I wouldn't expect a retarded twit like you to get it, though.

"learnt" is not a word. At best, it is slang.

At best, you are a 20 IQ ditz.

If the cap fits, wear it. You chose the name Fat Bytestard after all.

Anyhow, what's your problem ? Why do you feel that you have to slag off other people ? Some insecurity ? And why not do some
research before you open your mouth ?

Paris Texas more likely - and almost any mall in the USA.

On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:54:33 +0000, richard
wrote:

If the cap fits, wear it. You chose the name Fat Bytestard after all.


Which you are obviously so retarded that you cannot grasp the meaning
or depth of as well.

You are a complete idiot. Your post here is proof of that.

On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:54:33 +0000, richard
wrote:

Anyhow, what's your problem ?


There is NO SPACE between the end of the sentence and your punctuation,
retard boy.

On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:54:33 +0000, richard
wrote:


Paris Texas more likely - and almost any mall in the USA.


No, dip****. I have the original photo, which was before some lame UK
retard (probably you) doctored it.

If you were any more retarded, I'd call for your mother to be
imprisoned for the crime of not flushing you right after she shat you out
of her retarded ass.

FatBytestard wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:54:33 +0000, richard
wrote:


Anyhow, what's your problem ?



There is NO SPACE between the end of the sentence and your punctuation,
retard boy.


You appear to be blind as well as dumb !

FatBytestard wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:11:21 +0000, richard
wrote:


FatBytestard wrote:

On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:00:34 +0000, richard
wrote:



FatBytestard wrote:



I am quite sure that many in your lands are quite glad that they are
familiar with the technologies that we allowed you to have to protect
yourselves from attackers over the decades.

It seems that you learnt well from our torture chambers - and invented not a few methods yourselves - not that this will protect
you - in fact, rather the reverse, but that's what we came to expect from your brain dead former president.



You're about as retarded as it gets if you think he had anything to do
with the way the military apparatus functioned.

You're an even bigger retard if you think it will end.

'learnt' is not a word, you retarded twit.


It is you who is the stupid uneducated prick.
"Learnt" is in my Shorter Oxford Dictionary.

I attach a pin up for you which seems appropriate in the circumstances.



Nice photo edit, retard boy. Is that "apin-up" where you live?
Bwuahahahahahahaha! Your lameness quotient just went off the chart.

The original photo was "Paris, France", and "Paris Kentucky".

I wouldn't expect a retarded twit like you to get it, though.


No European would think of writing "Paris, France". It's just Paris.

Only Americans have to be told which country Paris is in - so abysmal is their knowledge of geography.

richard wrote:

No European would think of writing "Paris, France". It's just Paris.

Only Americans have to be told which country Paris is in - so abysmal is their knowledge of geography.


Bull****. No one says, Paris, America, but they do mention which
state it is in, if it is in the US. Not only that, but our Eiffel tower
is newer and in a hell of a lot better condition than that piece of
French crap. Of course, it is at an amusement park, where it belongs.

Only Europeans are so ignorant that they think there is only one city
named Paris. That doesn't say much for the education system in Europe,
does it?


--
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html

Goggle Groups, and Web TV users must request to be white listed, or I
will not see your messages.

If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm

On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:38:46 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


richard wrote:

No European would think of writing "Paris, France". It's just Paris.

Only Americans have to be told which country Paris is in - so abysmal is their knowledge of geography.


Bull****. No one says, Paris, America, but they do mention which
state it is in, if it is in the US. Not only that, but our Eiffel tower
is newer and in a hell of a lot better condition than that piece of
French crap. Of course, it is at an amusement park, where it belongs.

Only Europeans are so ignorant that they think there is only one city
named Paris. That doesn't say much for the education system in Europe,
does it?

Ah, yes! Paris, Kentucky ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

Obama-Nazi only visits Washington when he needs to change his suit

On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:34:01 +0000, richard
wrote:

FatBytestard wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:54:33 +0000, richard
wrote:


Anyhow, what's your problem ?



There is NO SPACE between the end of the sentence and your punctuation,
retard boy.


You appear to be blind as well as dumb !


I was talking about proper grammar and punctuation, not what the
retards (ie YOU, dumb****) are actually posting, which has nothing to do
with proper grammar and punctuation. More like PUNK-chew-ation.

You dip****s are about as pathetic as it gets!

On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:44:25 +0000, richard
wrote:

No European would think of writing "Paris, France". It's just Paris.


You're an idiot. In the context of the photo and its descriptions, yes
ANY person WOULD note it just that way.

Try being a bit less retarded, dumbass. Maybe one day your IQ will
rise above 20.

On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:04:23 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

Obama-Nazi only visits Washington when he needs to change his suit


Or he gets it from Ray Nagen, the dope that bought suits instead of
houses with the money 'his city' got. He is nothing more than petty
'cable trash', and Obama is nothing more than a thief in the night.

Archimedes' Lever wrote:



I was talking about proper grammar and punctuation, not what the
retards (ie YOU, dumb****) are actually posting, which has nothing to do
with proper grammar and punctuation. More like PUNK-chew-ation.

You dip****s are about as pathetic as it gets!

An angry troll!! Gentlemen, how did you do that!!!
Congratulations!!!

On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 05:07:13 +0100, Sjouke Burry
wrote:

Archimedes' Lever wrote:



I was talking about proper grammar and punctuation, not what the
retards (ie YOU, dumb****) are actually posting, which has nothing to do
with proper grammar and punctuation. More like PUNK-chew-ation.

You dip****s are about as pathetic as it gets!

An angry troll!! Gentlemen, how did you do that!!!
Congratulations!!!


You are so retarded that you actually think that you can discern mo0od
from what I posted. You are even more pathetic than the punctuation
retard is.

No, your retarded twit buddies are NOT "gentlemen".