View Single Post
  #12   Report Post  
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
FatBytestard FatBytestard is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 86
Default Hot and flaming.

On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 02:22:53 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:



FatBytestard wrote:

On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:13:41 +0000, richard
wrote:

FatBytestard wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:05:09 +0000, Eeyore
wrote:


Article on this famous UL test, now probably irrelevant due to
harmonisation with IEC.

Damn, too big again ( 1.26 MB )

Graham


Harmonization is correct, and is so for the greater part of those that
use Usenet. Your Olde English is just that... old. Outdated. Your
country should seriously consider catching up with the rest of the world,
instead of being bullheaded for the last 200 years since you got your
asses kicked out of our business.


That's rich from the country that still uses BTUs and all sorts of other ludicrous units.


For air conditioning, yes. Why say the unit is ludicrous? It is a
BRITISH invention.

I think you might have it ass backwards. I am from the USA. We use all
different units. Don't let your bias bend your brain. Ooops... too late.


So why are you using obsolete British units ?

Graham

There is a difference between obsolete and 'out of use'.

A difference you obviously have no grasp of.

There is also a difference between out of use and archaic.

Can you guess what category BTUs really falls into? I have my doubts.