On 17/05/2021 12:15, whisky-dave wrote:
On Sunday, 16 May 2021 at 13:10:55 UTC+1, Fredxx wrote:
On 15/05/2021 19:03, T i m wrote:
On Sat, 15 May 2021 18:03:45 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote:

New UK law:

"During a visit to Battersea Dogs and Cats Home, the Environment Secretary said that the Government would take a significant step forwards on animal welfare by formally recognising animals as sentient beings through a new Animal Sentience Bill that will be introduced to Parliament tomorrow (13 May), putting animal welfare at the very heart of government policy decision making."

Hopefully good news (and there will be plenty of more of that to
come).
That will be a first if you support animal welfare while an animal is
alive.

Be difficult to support welfare for animal or human when they are dead.
We cancled the right to have friends and familly at a funural during the pamdemic.

Quite, it shows an inconsistent policy.

If it improves farm animal welfare and demand humane slaughter, to
include the stunning or bolting of animals before slaughter then that
will indeed be a step forward.

Yes, but what worries me is whether religious beliefs will override it.

T i m doesn't attack these forms of slaughter, and passes where I state
he endorses religious practises employed in cruel animal slaughter so
can only be true.

Religious belief change like the wind. They are there for the rest of
society to pander to in fear of being called a racist of you don't.

If animals are to be recognised as sentient beings, shouldn't that mean everyone must become vegetarian?

No, because that means we aren't recognising the sentience and so
rights of egg laying chickens or cows.
If we want children's brains to develop normally then they require a
As babies they don't need meat.
natural balanced diet to include meat products.

But one day there might be a way around this meat is just chemicals and their reactions.
And then it;s just how much meat do we need.
During WWII when less meat was availble it seemed that peolpe didn't really suffer too much because of this.

There may well be a method of creating the range of organic compounds to
replace meat. But fanatical vegans don't think this is worthy of support
either.

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/2...r-intelligence
And the indoctrination that leads to such exploitation starts at an
early age:

https://ibb.co/wcMQjvn
Quite, we evolved the lactase persistent gene years ago.

Some have 'evloved' to not be able to eat nuts although there are three distinct things
we ignorantly refer to as nuts.

I don't know much about nut allergies. There was an article some time
ago that correlated how we are slow to introduce nuts to children, for
fear of choking, and this might add to this allergy.

It seems it's best to introduce smooth peanut butter to children as soon
as possible, to prevent the severe reaction in later life.

Beware of some girls in thialand (lady boys) they contain nuts. ;-)

Thank you for the warning :-)

On Monday, 17 May 2021 at 14:08:47 UTC+1, Fredxx wrote:
On 17/05/2021 12:15, whisky-dave wrote:
On Sunday, 16 May 2021 at 13:10:55 UTC+1, Fredxx wrote:
On 15/05/2021 19:03, T i m wrote:
On Sat, 15 May 2021 18:03:45 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote:

New UK law:

"During a visit to Battersea Dogs and Cats Home, the Environment Secretary said that the Government would take a significant step forwards on animal welfare by formally recognising animals as sentient beings through a new Animal Sentience Bill that will be introduced to Parliament tomorrow (13 May), putting animal welfare at the very heart of government policy decision making."

Hopefully good news (and there will be plenty of more of that to
come).
That will be a first if you support animal welfare while an animal is
alive.

Be difficult to support welfare for animal or human when they are dead.
We cancled the right to have friends and familly at a funural during the pamdemic.
Quite, it shows an inconsistent policy.

The needs of the many ....

If it improves farm animal welfare and demand humane slaughter, to
include the stunning or bolting of animals before slaughter then that
will indeed be a step forward.

Yes, but what worries me is whether religious beliefs will override it.
T i m doesn't attack these forms of slaughter, and passes where I state
he endorses religious practises employed in cruel animal slaughter so
can only be true.

It isn;t up to him to enforce laws in other countries or cultures or even vote in them,
even if he only gives a NOTA .
But I believe in the UK we are allowed to dictate what goes on via our democrazy
(now don't laugh it sort of works).
The prime directive ;-)



Religious belief change like the wind. They are there for the rest of
society to pander to in fear of being called a racist of you don't.

yes I know, get that in univs with their so called polices and crap.

If animals are to be recognised as sentient beings, shouldn't that mean everyone must become vegetarian?

No, because that means we aren't recognising the sentience and so
rights of egg laying chickens or cows.
If we want children's brains to develop normally then they require a
As babies they don't need meat.
natural balanced diet to include meat products.

But one day there might be a way around this meat is just chemicals and their reactions.
And then it;s just how much meat do we need.
During WWII when less meat was availble it seemed that peolpe didn't really suffer too much because of this.
There may well be a method of creating the range of organic compounds to
replace meat. But fanatical vegans don't think this is worthy of support
either.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/2...r-intelligence
And the indoctrination that leads to such exploitation starts at an
early age:

https://ibb.co/wcMQjvn
Quite, we evolved the lactase persistent gene years ago.

Some have 'evloved' to not be able to eat nuts although there are three distinct things
we ignorantly refer to as nuts.
I don't know much about nut allergies. There was an article some time
ago that correlated how we are slow to introduce nuts to children, for
fear of choking, and this might add to this allergy.

As is them living in too clean an envioment.
There's lots of allergies thay can't all be from not being around certain things.
Even pollen


My work collegue has the nut and lactase allergy.
His parents are chinese and they ran a chippy in southend for years.
he was born there (southend) 40 odd years ago.




It seems it's best to introduce smooth peanut butter to children as soon
as possible, to prevent the severe reaction in later life.

Maybe the same can be said of marmite , and the French/Spanish
introduce wine to kids early on and they
don't seem to have the alcohol pproblems we do in the UK.

Beware of some girls in thialand (lady boys) they contain nuts. ;-)
Thank you for the warning :-)

On Mon, 17 May 2021 14:08:43 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

On 17/05/2021 12:15, whisky-dave wrote:
On Sunday, 16 May 2021 at 13:10:55 UTC+1, Fredxx wrote:
On 15/05/2021 19:03, T i m wrote:
And the indoctrination that leads to such exploitation starts at an
early age:

https://ibb.co/wcMQjvn
Quite, we evolved the lactase persistent gene years ago.

Some have 'evloved' to not be able to eat nuts although there are three distinct things
we ignorantly refer to as nuts.

I don't know much about nut allergies. There was an article some time
ago that correlated how we are slow to introduce nuts to children, for
fear of choking, and this might add to this allergy.

Since peanuts aren't technically a nut, you can eat those with a nut allergy.

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 17 May 2021 14:08:43 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

On 17/05/2021 12:15, whisky-dave wrote:
On Sunday, 16 May 2021 at 13:10:55 UTC+1, Fredxx wrote:
On 15/05/2021 19:03, T i m wrote:
And the indoctrination that leads to such exploitation starts at an
early age:

https://ibb.co/wcMQjvn
Quite, we evolved the lactase persistent gene years ago.

Some have 'evloved' to not be able to eat nuts although there are three
distinct things
we ignorantly refer to as nuts.

I don't know much about nut allergies. There was an article some time
ago that correlated how we are slow to introduce nuts to children, for
fear of choking, and this might add to this allergy.

Since peanuts aren't technically a nut, you can eat those with a nut
allergy.

Wrong.

On Mon, 24 May 2021 08:00:04 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

--
Another typical retarded "conversation" between the two resident idiots:

Birdbrain: "But imagine how cool it was to own slaves."

Senile Rodent: "Yeah, right. Feed them, clothe them, and fix them when
they're broken.
After all, you paid good money for them. Then you've got to keep an eye
on them all the time."

Birdbrain: "Better than having to give them wages on top of that."

Senile Rodent: "Specially when they make more slaves for you
and produce their own food and clothes."

MID:

On 05/23/2021 12:58 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 17 May 2021 14:08:43 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

On 17/05/2021 12:15, whisky-dave wrote:
On Sunday, 16 May 2021 at 13:10:55 UTC+1, Fredxx wrote:
On 15/05/2021 19:03, T i m wrote:
And the indoctrination that leads to such exploitation starts at an
early age:

https://ibb.co/wcMQjvn
Quite, we evolved the lactase persistent gene years ago.

Some have 'evloved' to not be able to eat nuts although there are
three distinct things
we ignorantly refer to as nuts.

I don't know much about nut allergies. There was an article some time
ago that correlated how we are slow to introduce nuts to children, for
fear of choking, and this might add to this allergy.

Since peanuts aren't technically a nut, you can eat those with a nut
allergy.

Unless you have a peanut allergy. I couldn't find statistics for how
many people have both but apparently peanut allergies are much more
prevalent now.

https://www.scienceabc.com/eyeopener...allergies.html

I'd put my money on parents that won't give little kids peanuts because
they possibly might be allergic.

https://www.businessinsider.com/amer...s-2018-10?op=1

When I was a kid I ordered PB&J for my school lunch so consistently my
teacher, Miss McCarthy, told me I should expand my horizons so I ordered
bologna to make her happy. I thought bologna on margarine covered bread
sucked. Still do.


The next day I was sick but probably nothing to do with the bologna. It
happened to by St. Patrick's day and watching a TV show running down
Irish names suggested Miss McCarthy was Irish.

The next day I was back to PB&J but being a wise ass I had to throw in
'I'll never take advice from an Irishman again.' Being a small town
that led to some discrete inquiries about my home situation. In truth,
Germans always got along very well with the Irish; it's the ****ing
Brits neither of us care for.

On Sun, 23 May 2021 16:50:03 -0600, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:

Unless you have a peanut allergy.

If ONLY you had an allergy against the unwashed ******'s cock, lowbrowwoman,
you old cocksucking senile Yankie whore!

"rbowman" wrote in message
...
On 05/23/2021 12:58 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 17 May 2021 14:08:43 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

On 17/05/2021 12:15, whisky-dave wrote:
On Sunday, 16 May 2021 at 13:10:55 UTC+1, Fredxx wrote:
On 15/05/2021 19:03, T i m wrote:
And the indoctrination that leads to such exploitation starts at an
early age:

https://ibb.co/wcMQjvn
Quite, we evolved the lactase persistent gene years ago.

Some have 'evloved' to not be able to eat nuts although there are
three distinct things
we ignorantly refer to as nuts.

I don't know much about nut allergies. There was an article some time
ago that correlated how we are slow to introduce nuts to children, for
fear of choking, and this might add to this allergy.

Since peanuts aren't technically a nut, you can eat those with a nut
allergy.

Unless you have a peanut allergy. I couldn't find statistics for how many
people have both but apparently peanut allergies are much more prevalent
now.

https://www.scienceabc.com/eyeopener...allergies.html

I'd put my money on parents that won't give little kids peanuts because
they possibly might be allergic.

https://www.businessinsider.com/amer...s-2018-10?op=1

When I was a kid I ordered PB&J for my school lunch so consistently my
teacher, Miss McCarthy, told me I should expand my horizons so I ordered
bologna to make her happy. I thought bologna on margarine covered bread
sucked. Still do.


The next day I was sick but probably nothing to do with the bologna. It
happened to by St. Patrick's day and watching a TV show running down Irish
names suggested Miss McCarthy was Irish.

The next day I was back to PB&J but being a wise ass I had to throw in
'I'll never take advice from an Irishman again.' Being a small town that
led to some discrete inquiries about my home situation. In truth, Germans
always got along very well with the Irish; it's the ****ing Brits neither
of us care for.

And yet they have kraut kings and queens.

On Mon, 24 May 2021 10:53:44 +1000, Joey, better known as cantankerous
trolling senile geezer Rodent Speed, wrote:

FLUSH the trolling senile asshole's latest troll**** unread

--
FredXX to Rodent Speed:
"You are still an idiot and an embarrassment to your country. No wonder
we shipped the likes of you out of the British Isles. Perhaps stupidity
and criminality is inherited after all?"
Message-ID: