Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/05/2021 02:15, williamwright wrote:
On 07/05/2021 18:15, ARW wrote: Now how will the tv faceplate (or a socket) fit on an exterior wall in the bedrooms? I wonder how far from a straight line the wall will deviate across the width of a wallplate? Taking the tower as a circle with a diameter of 10m then a 146mm double socket would have a maximum gap of 0.53mm - well within the IP4x. -- Robin reply-to address is (intended to be) valid |
#42
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/05/2021 02:10, williamwright wrote:
On 06/05/2021 21:10, NY wrote: I remember we had a set of about 10 attenuators daisy-chained together between the aerial lead from the wall socket and the one to the TV. Because there's always some signal pick-up at the TV set itself, strong attenuation could result in pre- or post-echo in the analogue days. If the aerial was local to the TV set the result would be signal cancellation in an unpredictable manner, and that is what happens with DTT. If the aerial is remote, such as with a distribution system, you'd see 'ghosts'. However, massive signal levels should appear at outlets on a system. That's unless the tenant has climbed into the loft and bypassed a high value tap-off unit! Incidentally a lot of aerial installers short out braid to inner with one or two strands rather than use an attenuator. Why? Because they're stupid. Bill Before the most recent frequency changes I was changing my old group C/D loft-mounted aerial for a log-periodic job and noticed that even with no aerial at all I could still get a clean picture and sound on the main HD channels (from Midhurst) with just the builders coax running up from the lounge and lying loose in the loft. |
#43
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/05/2021 12:25, Robin wrote:
On 10/05/2021 02:15, williamwright wrote: On 07/05/2021 18:15, ARW wrote: Now how will the tv faceplate (or a socket) fit on an exterior wall in the bedrooms? I wonder how far from a straight line the wall will deviate across the width of a wallplate? Taking the tower as a circle with a diameter of 10m then a 146mm double socket would have a maximum gap of 0.53mm - well within the IP4x. Thank you. Bill |
#44
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/05/2021 12:35, Andrew wrote:
Before the most recent frequency changes I was changing my old group C/D loft-mounted aerial for a log-periodic job and noticed that even with no aerial at all I could still get a clean picture and sound on the main HD channels (from Midhurst) with just the builders coax running up from the lounge and lying loose in the loft. Yes, builder's coax receives signal and interference quite well! Bill |
#45
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/05/2021 12:25, Robin wrote:
On 10/05/2021 02:15, williamwright wrote: On 07/05/2021 18:15, ARW wrote: Now how will the tv faceplate (or a socket) fit on an exterior wall in the bedrooms? I wonder how far from a straight line the wall will deviate across the width of a wallplate? Taking the tower as a circle with a diameter of 10m then a 146mm double socket would have a maximum gap of 0.53mm - well within the IP4x. So actually that's a smaller gap than on a Taylor Wimpey new build flat wall:-) Thanks for the calculations. Much appreciated. I am on slow time this week with no access to a mobile phone or computer in the day time. -- Adam |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|