UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,341
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

I've just bought some miniature RCBOs to replace MCBs in my CU - the
lighting circuits are on a 100mA RCD as is a spur to a socket in the
loft(!).

In a c. 1990 CU there isn't space for full-size RCBOs whereas the minis will
fit.
What I can't find out is if there's any disadvantage to a mini over a
full-sized one. So far as I can see there are some advantages:
tend to be cheaper
fit in the CU
effectively double pole
don't need to be disconnected when running tests

What am I missing on this? What's the point of big RCBOs?
--
Peter.
The gods will stay away
whilst religions hold sway
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,829
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

PeterC wrote:

What's the point of big RCBOs?


I think the first generation RCBOs were taller, then they managed to
shrink them to MCB size in second generation, so I don't think there's
any 'point' as such to the tall ones.
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
ARW ARW is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,161
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 15/11/2020 08:56, Andy Burns wrote:
PeterC wrote:

What's the point of big RCBOs?


I think the first generation RCBOs were taller, then they managed to
shrink them to MCB size in secondÂ* generation, so I don't think there's
any 'point' as such to the tall ones.


The small ones often do not have the functional earth fly lead.

--
Adam
  #4   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,341
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 12:35:18 +0000, ARW wrote:

On 15/11/2020 08:56, Andy Burns wrote:
PeterC wrote:

What's the point of big RCBOs?


I think the first generation RCBOs were taller, then they managed to
shrink them to MCB size in second* generation, so I don't think there's
any 'point' as such to the tall ones.


The small ones often do not have the functional earth fly lead.


Looking at the manufacturer's site for Wylex and Crabtree, neither do the
big ones.
The full-size ones mention disconnection before testing the circuit; the
miniature ones don't.
--
Peter.
The gods will stay away
whilst religions hold sway
  #5   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39,563
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 15/11/2020 12:35, ARW wrote:
On 15/11/2020 08:56, Andy Burns wrote:
PeterC wrote:

What's the point of big RCBOs?


I think the first generation RCBOs were taller, then they managed to
shrink them to MCB size in secondÂ* generation, so I don't think
there's any 'point' as such to the tall ones.


The small ones often do not have the functional earth fly lead.

No RCD/RCBO has a 'functional earth fly lead'.


--
I would rather have questions that cannot be answered...
....than to have answers that cannot be questioned

Richard Feynman




  #6   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,829
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

The Natural Philosopher wrote:

ARW wrote:

The small ones often do not have the functional earth fly lead.


No RCD/RCBOÂ* has a 'functional earth fly lead'.


The white lead here ...

https://www.circpro.co.uk/mk-sentry-rcbo
  #7   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39,563
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 15/11/2020 14:15, Andy Burns wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:

ARW wrote:

The small ones often do not have the functional earth fly lead.


No RCD/RCBOÂ* has a 'functional earth fly lead'.


The white lead here ...


....is not part of the trip function. No idea what its for, perhaps to
earth something in the switch...




--
The biggest threat to humanity comes from socialism, which has utterly
diverted our attention away from what really matters to our existential
survival, to indulging in navel gazing and faux moral investigations
into what the world ought to be, whilst we fail utterly to deal with
what it actually is.

  #8   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
ARW ARW is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,161
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 15/11/2020 14:55, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 15/11/2020 14:15, Andy Burns wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:

ARW wrote:

The small ones often do not have the functional earth fly lead.

No RCD/RCBOÂ* has a 'functional earth fly lead'.


The white lead here ...


...is not part of the trip function. No idea what its for, perhaps to
earth something in the switch...





It allows the RCBO to continue working and detect a LE fault in the
unlikely event of a missing/lost neutral.

RCD's do not have these fly leads.

And ******s oversleeve the flyleads with green/yellow. But then some
RCBO manufactures have a flylead with a green/yellow cable.


--
Adam
  #9   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,829
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

The Natural Philosopher wrote:

Andy Burns wrote:

The Natural Philosopher wrote:

No RCD/RCBOÂ* has a 'functional earth fly lead'.


The white lead here ...


...is not part of the trip function.


Zoom in ... it's shown as part of the circuitry measuring current
differences

https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5ec649c17e93ee14ea6f1a9b/1594219056973-3YJBH0HJX2Y5AZISSGW8/ke17ZwdGBToddI8pDm48kPlAdDxmOe2wO-VlVH21GUIUqsxRUqqbr1mOJYKfIPR7LoDQ9mXPOjoJoqy81S2I 8PaoYXhp6HxIwZIk7-Mi3Tsic-L2IOPH3Dwrhl-Ne3Z2KbNUfoO6AOkUKHX6DcHzYjCBx_xjkpU-kAGxUEirxz46liCGkj4dr9PBmyqqYlee/6310S.jpg

No idea what its for, perhaps to
earth something in the switch...

  #10   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25,191
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 15/11/2020 14:55, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 15/11/2020 14:15, Andy Burns wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:

ARW wrote:

The small ones often do not have the functional earth fly lead.

No RCD/RCBOÂ* has a 'functional earth fly lead'.


The white lead here ...


....is not part of the trip function.


It is - but it adds a capability that normal RCDs don't have.

No idea what its for, perhaps to
earth something in the switch...


It will allow it to trip in the unlikely event that you get a neutral
disconnection. (which on a PME supply could leave all earthed metalwork
in the house at mains voltage)


--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/


  #11   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,341
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 15:14:39 +0000, ARW wrote:

On 15/11/2020 14:55, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 15/11/2020 14:15, Andy Burns wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:

ARW wrote:

The small ones often do not have the functional earth fly lead.

No RCD/RCBO* has a 'functional earth fly lead'.

The white lead here ...


...is not part of the trip function. No idea what its for, perhaps to
earth something in the switch...



It allows the RCBO to continue working and detect a LE fault in the
unlikely event of a missing/lost neutral.

RCD's do not have these fly leads.

And ******s oversleeve the flyleads with green/yellow. But then some
RCBO manufactures have a flylead with a green/yellow cable.


Can that fly lead have a DIY equivalent wired into a mini-RCBO? I can't see
from the image that Andy posted what it's connected to on the RCBO.
--
Peter.
The gods will stay away
whilst religions hold sway
  #12   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 524
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On Sunday, 15 November 2020 at 22:10:40 UTC, PeterC wrote:

Can that fly lead have a DIY equivalent wired into a mini-RCBO? I can't see
from the image that Andy posted what it's connected to on the RCBO.


No. (It'd have to be connected internally to the imbalance detection circuit).
  #13   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,159
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 15/11/2020 15:14, ARW wrote:
On 15/11/2020 14:55, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 15/11/2020 14:15, Andy Burns wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:

ARW wrote:

The small ones often do not have the functional earth fly lead.

No RCD/RCBOÂ* has a 'functional earth fly lead'.

The white lead here ...


...is not part of the trip function. No idea what its for, perhaps to
earth something in the switch...





It allows the RCBO to continue working and detect a LE fault in the
unlikely event of a missing/lost neutral.

RCD's do not have these fly leads.

And ******s oversleeve the flyleads with green/yellow. But then some
RCBO manufactures have a flylead with a green/yellow cable.



Glad you came along Adam!

Bill
  #14   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39,563
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 15/11/2020 15:14, ARW wrote:
On 15/11/2020 14:55, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 15/11/2020 14:15, Andy Burns wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:

ARW wrote:

The small ones often do not have the functional earth fly lead.

No RCD/RCBOÂ* has a 'functional earth fly lead'.

The white lead here ...


...is not part of the trip function. No idea what its for, perhaps to
earth something in the switch...





It allows the RCBO to continue working and detect a LE fault in the
unlikely event of a missing/lost neutral.

You haven't looked at the circuit diagram have you?
Or thought about what you just said.

How is the current - the massive current - that should flow down the
neutral going to get back to base if there is no neutral?

Down that poxy little wire to *earth*? What????
Earth is simply safety, it never passes significant current except under
fault conditions. You cant operate *at all* without a neutral.





--
€œProgress is precisely that which rules and regulations did not foresee,€

€“ Ludwig von Mises
  #15   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39,563
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 15/11/2020 15:40, Andy Burns wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:

Andy Burns wrote:

The Natural Philosopher wrote:

No RCD/RCBOÂ* has a 'functional earth fly lead'.

The white lead here ...


...is not part of the trip function.


Zoom in ... it's shown as part of the circuitry measuring current
differences

I did and its clearly there to earth a bit of metal in there.

THINK. How COULD it be part of it. If it passes any current at all it is
CREATING an earth fault.


https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5ec649c17e93ee14ea6f1a9b/1594219056973-3YJBH0HJX2Y5AZISSGW8/ke17ZwdGBToddI8pDm48kPlAdDxmOe2wO-VlVH21GUIUqsxRUqqbr1mOJYKfIPR7LoDQ9mXPOjoJoqy81S2I 8PaoYXhp6HxIwZIk7-Mi3Tsic-L2IOPH3Dwrhl-Ne3Z2KbNUfoO6AOkUKHX6DcHzYjCBx_xjkpU-kAGxUEirxz46liCGkj4dr9PBmyqqYlee/6310S.jpg


No idea what its for, perhaps to earth something in the switch...



--
Truth welcomes investigation because truth knows investigation will lead
to converts. It is deception that uses all the other techniques.


  #16   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,341
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 14:19:40 -0800 (PST), Mathew Newton wrote:

On Sunday, 15 November 2020 at 22:10:40 UTC, PeterC wrote:

Can that fly lead have a DIY equivalent wired into a mini-RCBO? I can't see
from the image that Andy posted what it's connected to on the RCBO.


No. (It'd have to be connected internally to the imbalance detection circuit).


I see - thanks.
--
Peter.
The gods will stay away
whilst religions hold sway
  #17   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,237
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 16 Nov 2020 at 08:43:07 GMT, "The Natural Philosopher"
wrote:

On 15/11/2020 15:40, Andy Burns wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:

Andy Burns wrote:

The Natural Philosopher wrote:

No RCD/RCBOÂ* has a 'functional earth fly lead'.

The white lead here ...

...is not part of the trip function.


Zoom in ... it's shown as part of the circuitry measuring current
differences

I did and its clearly there to earth a bit of metal in there.

THINK. How COULD it be part of it. If it passes any current at all it is
CREATING an earth fault.

All they have to do is draw the current for the electronics *before* the
imbalance detector.



--
Roger Hayter


  #18   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39,563
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 16/11/2020 09:43, Roger Hayter wrote:
On 16 Nov 2020 at 08:43:07 GMT, "The Natural Philosopher"
wrote:

On 15/11/2020 15:40, Andy Burns wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:

Andy Burns wrote:

The Natural Philosopher wrote:

No RCD/RCBOÂ* has a 'functional earth fly lead'.

The white lead here ...

...is not part of the trip function.

Zoom in ... it's shown as part of the circuitry measuring current
differences

I did and its clearly there to earth a bit of metal in there.

THINK. How COULD it be part of it. If it passes any current at all it is
CREATING an earth fault.

All they have to do is draw the current for the electronics *before* the
imbalance detector.


WHAT electronics?








--
"In our post-modern world, climate science is not powerful because it is
true: it is true because it is powerful."

Lucas Bergkamp
  #19   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,829
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

The Natural Philosopher wrote:

Roger Hayter wrote:

The Natural Philosopher wrote:

THINK. How COULD it be part of it. If it passes any current at all it is
CREATING an earth fault.


All they have to do is draw the current for the electronics *before* the
imbalance detector.


WHAT electronics?


THESE electronics ... the white earth flylead seems to connect to a pin
on the balance transformer (whatever the correct term might be)

https://youtu.be/8kWIITspYvk?t=441
  #20   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,829
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

Andy Burns wrote:

he white earth flylead seems to connect to a pin
on the balance transformer (whatever the correct term might be)


no, it might only go to the other circuitry on the PCB, not to the
windings ...



  #21   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39,563
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 16/11/2020 11:12, Andy Burns wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:

Roger Hayter wrote:

The Natural Philosopher wrote:

THINK. How COULD it be part of it. If it passes any current at all
it is
CREATING an earth fault.

All they have to do is draw the current for the electronics *before* the
imbalance detector.


WHAT electronics?


THESE electronics ... the white earth flylead seems to connect to a pin
on the balance transformer (whatever the correct term might be)

https://youtu.be/8kWIITspYvk?t=441


Blimey. I'll concede that. They have devloped since my time...BUT if
you look at the circuit diagram later in that video, you will see than
no earth is involved. The only possible thing it *might* do is nothing
to do with RCD detection per se, but it MIGHT detect voltage on the
neutral with respect to earth.

Not something that bothers me at all.

--
"I guess a rattlesnake ain't risponsible fer bein' a rattlesnake, but ah
puts mah heel on um jess the same if'n I catches him around mah chillun".

  #22   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,829
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

The Natural Philosopher wrote:

Blimey.


Imagine what AFDDs are going to be like, a DSP to discriminate between
harmless sparks and fiery sparks?

I'll concedeÂ* that. They have devloped since my time...BUT if
you look at the circuit diagram later in that video, you will see than
no earth is involved.


Yes, the reference circuit for the chip shows it has a "substrate ground"

http://eng.fmsh.com/AjaxFile/DownLoadFile.aspx?FilePath=/UpLoadFile/20140904/VG54123_ds_eng.pdf&fileExt=file

but no PE or FE earth connection, makes you wonder if MK have added
something extra on the PCB for lost-neutral detection?

The only possible thing it *might* do is nothing
to do with RCD detection per se,Â* but it MIGHT detect voltage on the
neutral with respect to earth.

Not something that bothers me at all.


  #23   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
ARW ARW is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,161
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 16/11/2020 11:18, Andy Burns wrote:
Andy Burns wrote:

he white earth flylead seems to connect to a pin on the balance
transformer (whatever the correct term might be)


no, it might only go to the other circuitry on the PCB, not to the
windings ...



https://youtu.be/gOUSDDLKICk?t=876

--
Adam
  #24   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,829
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

ARW wrote:

Andy Burns wrote:

he white earth flylead seems to connect to a pin on the balance
transformer (whatever the correct term might be)


no, it might only go to the other circuitry on the PCB, not to the
windings ...


https://youtu.be/gOUSDDLKICk?t=876


makes sense, and the IC uses a SCR to "crowbar" live to neutral if it
detects an imbalance fault, it won't draw current for very long over the
thin white wire ...
  #25   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25,191
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 15/11/2020 15:14, ARW wrote:
On 15/11/2020 14:55, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 15/11/2020 14:15, Andy Burns wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:

ARW wrote:

The small ones often do not have the functional earth fly lead.

No RCD/RCBOÂ* has a 'functional earth fly lead'.

The white lead here ...


...is not part of the trip function. No idea what its for, perhaps to
earth something in the switch...





It allows the RCBO to continue working and detect a LE fault in the
unlikely event of a missing/lost neutral.

RCD's do not have these fly leads.

And ******s oversleeve the flyleads with green/yellow. But then some
RCBO manufactures have a flylead with a green/yellow cable.


Probably worth highlighting the reason for Adam's indignation regarding
over sleeving. While the correct colour sleeving for a protective
conductor is the normal green/yellow, the correct colour for a
functional earth is actually cream.


--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/


  #26   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,829
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

John Rumm wrote:

Probably worth highlighting the reason for Adam's indignation regarding
over sleeving. While the correct colour sleeving for a protective
conductor is the normal green/yellow, the correct colour for a
functional earth is actually cream.


Although the printing on that RCBO actually says 'PE' instead of 'FE'
for the white flylead.

and the text within the little box connected to the current transformer
and the earth flylead says "1Δ" instead of the expected "IΔ"

Original image URL (will be zoomable unless you have a portrait monitor).

https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5ec649c17e93ee14ea6f1a9b/1594219056973-3YJBH0HJX2Y5AZISSGW8/ke17ZwdGBToddI8pDm48kPlAdDxmOe2wO-VlVH21GUIUqsxRUqqbr1mOJYKfIPR7LoDQ9mXPOjoJoqy81S2I 8PaoYXhp6HxIwZIk7-Mi3Tsic-L2IOPH3Dwrhl-Ne3Z2KbNUfoO6AOkUKHX6DcHzYjCBx_xjkpU-kAGxUEirxz46liCGkj4dr9PBmyqqYlee/6310S.jpg

Note that MK Sentry range is now licenced for CircPro to
manufacture/sell rather than being a Honeywell brand.
  #27   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25,191
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 16/11/2020 08:41, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 15/11/2020 15:14, ARW wrote:
On 15/11/2020 14:55, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 15/11/2020 14:15, Andy Burns wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:

ARW wrote:

The small ones often do not have the functional earth fly lead.

No RCD/RCBOÂ* has a 'functional earth fly lead'.

The white lead here ...

...is not part of the trip function. No idea what its for, perhaps to
earth something in the switch...





It allows the RCBO to continue working and detect a LE fault in the
unlikely event of a missing/lost neutral.

You haven't looked at the circuit diagram have you?
Or thought about what you just said.

How is the currentÂ* - the massive current - that should flow down the
neutral going to get back to base if there is no neutral?


Its not.

Down that poxy little wire to *earth*? What????


No, and it does not need to either.

Earth is simply safety,


Not true of a functional earth - you are thinking of a protective earth.

When you make the earth connection between your turntable and amp, is
that for safety?

it never passes significant current except under
fault conditions.


Its not a protective earth, so won't ever pass a significant current
even under fault conditions.

You cant operate *at all* without a neutral.


You can if you have a functional earth, that is one of the reasons for
having it[1].

Even in even in the event of a PEN conductor disconnection on a TN-C-S
supply, that functional earth should still have *some* fortuitous
earthing via the main equipotential bonds etc. That will allow adequate
current to be drawn by the electronics in the RCBO to detect the fault,
and trip.

[1] One might argue the benefits, since the loss of neutral is rare, and
adding an extra connection makes the job of wiring more time consuming
and also makes testing more complicated since the FE will likely need to
be disconnected for IR and earth loop testing. However others would cite
that reports of loss of neutral still occur about once a day somewhere
in the UK.


--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/
  #28   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25,191
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 16/11/2020 12:55, Andy Burns wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:

Blimey.


Imagine what AFDDs are going to be like, a DSP to discriminate between
harmless sparks and fiery sparks?

I'll concedeÂ* that. They have devloped since my time...BUT if you look
at the circuit diagram later in that video, you will see than no earth
is involved.


Yes, the reference circuit for the chip shows it has a "substrate ground"

http://eng.fmsh.com/AjaxFile/DownLoadFile.aspx?FilePath=/UpLoadFile/20140904/VG54123_ds_eng.pdf&fileExt=file


but no PE or FE earth connection, makes you wonder if MK have added
something extra on the PCB for lost-neutral detection?


There is no actual requirement for a RCBO to have a FE connection (and
indeed many brands don't), however if its present, then the standards do
have things to say about how it should work IIUC.



--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/
  #29   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,829
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

John Rumm wrote:

There is no actual requirement for a RCBO to have a FE connection (and
indeed many brands don't), however if its present, then the standards do
have things to say about how it should work IIUC.


I couldn't see any mention of PE or FE in BS EN 61009-1, other than in
deleted wording.


  #30   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25,191
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 17/11/2020 11:33, Andy Burns wrote:
John Rumm wrote:

There is no actual requirement for a RCBO to have a FE connection (and
indeed many brands don't), however if its present, then the standards
do have things to say about how it should work IIUC.


I couldn't see any mention of PE or FE in BS EN 61009-1, other than in
deleted wording.


The 2004 version has a requirement to use label the terminal with the
protective earth icon as per IEC 60417-5019a rather than the functional
earth symbol as previously recommended!

Can't recall where I did see mention of it now.


--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/


  #31   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,213
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 17/11/2020 12:32, John Rumm wrote:
On 17/11/2020 11:33, Andy Burns wrote:
John Rumm wrote:

There is no actual requirement for a RCBO to have a FE connection
(and indeed many brands don't), however if its present, then the
standards do have things to say about how it should work IIUC.


I couldn't see any mention of PE or FE in BS EN 61009-1, other than in
deleted wording.


The 2004 version has a requirement to use label the terminal with the
protective earth icon as per IEC 60417-5019a rather than the functional
earth symbol as previously recommended!

Can't recall where I did see mention of it now.


Do RCBO's still consume power even when no user devices are
using power ?.
Assuming 6 in the consumer unit of a typical average house,
how much leccy is used per year ?.
  #32   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,829
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

Andrew wrote:

Do RCBO's still consume power even when no user devices are
using power ?.


Yes

Assuming 6 in the consumer unit of a typical average house,
how much leccy is used per year ?.


The chip used on the PCB says max 10mA consumption, so that's a couple
of watts per RCBO, I doubt anything else on the PCB consumes much unless
it's in the act of tripping, so one or two quid each per year?
  #33   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25,191
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 17/11/2020 14:00, Andrew wrote:
On 17/11/2020 12:32, John Rumm wrote:
On 17/11/2020 11:33, Andy Burns wrote:
John Rumm wrote:

There is no actual requirement for a RCBO to have a FE connection
(and indeed many brands don't), however if its present, then the
standards do have things to say about how it should work IIUC.

I couldn't see any mention of PE or FE in BS EN 61009-1, other than
in deleted wording.


The 2004 version has a requirement to use label the terminal with the
protective earth icon as per IEC 60417-5019a rather than the
functional earth symbol as previously recommended!

Can't recall where I did see mention of it now.


Do RCBO's still consume power even when no user devices are
using power ?.


Yup that have "always on" electronics - so will consume a very small
amount same as any RCD.

(The MCB element will also dissipate a certain amount of heat when on
high load since this is a function of how the thermal part of its trip
mechanism works)

Assuming 6 in the consumer unit of a typical average house,
how much leccy is used per year ?.


Finding data for the power consumption or the RCD elements themselves is
actually quite tricky. ISTR Wylex publishing a figure of between 1.5 and
2.5W per RCBO depending on load.

So if we said it was 10W total for your 6 circuit CU, that would be 1kWh
every 100h operation, or ~87 kWh - could be £10 or so depending on your
unit price.



--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/
  #34   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
ARW ARW is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,161
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 17/11/2020 06:51, Andy Burns wrote:
John Rumm wrote:

Probably worth highlighting the reason for Adam's indignation
regarding over sleeving. While the correct colour sleeving for a
protective conductor is the normal green/yellow, the correct colour
for a functional earth is actually cream.


Although the printing on that RCBO actually says 'PE' instead of 'FE'
for the white flylead.

and the text within the little box connected to the current transformer
and the earth flylead says "1Δ" instead of the expected "IΔ"

Original image URL (will be zoomable unless you have a portrait monitor).

https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5ec649c17e93ee14ea6f1a9b/1594219056973-3YJBH0HJX2Y5AZISSGW8/ke17ZwdGBToddI8pDm48kPlAdDxmOe2wO-VlVH21GUIUqsxRUqqbr1mOJYKfIPR7LoDQ9mXPOjoJoqy81S2I 8PaoYXhp6HxIwZIk7-Mi3Tsic-L2IOPH3Dwrhl-Ne3Z2KbNUfoO6AOkUKHX6DcHzYjCBx_xjkpU-kAGxUEirxz46liCGkj4dr9PBmyqqYlee/6310S.jpg


Note that MK Sentry range is now licenced for CircPro to
manufacture/sell rather than being a Honeywell brand.



MK pulled out of the CU market last year. It was posted on here.
Probably just before we went to the Elex show.

--
Adam
  #35   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,829
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

ARW wrote:

MK pulled out of the CU market last year. It was posted on here.
Probably just before we went to the Elex show.


But the MK sentry brand is now back ... licenced by Honeywell to
CircPro, who apparently are the people who were making the sentry range
all along!

https://www.circpro.co.uk



  #36   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
ARW ARW is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,161
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 17/11/2020 18:59, Andy Burns wrote:
ARW wrote:

MK pulled out of the CU market last year. It was posted on here.
Probably just before we went to the Elex show.


But the MK sentry brand is now back ... licenced by Honeywell to
CircPro, who apparently are the people who were making the sentry range
all along!

https://www.circpro.co.uk


I wonder who is making the SPDs?

--
Adam
  #37   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,829
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

ARW wrote:

I wonder who is making the SPDs?


strangely they seem to be black rather than pale grey.

https://thomaselectricaldistributors.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/H6820S-scaled.jpg

these look quite similar, not identical though

http://www.surge-protectiondevice.com/photo/pl24657634-type_2_pluggable_2p_modular_surge_arrestor_320v_40 ka_surge_protection_device.jpg
  #38   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,591
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 2020-11-17, John Rumm wrote:

On 15/11/2020 15:14, ARW wrote:
On 15/11/2020 14:55, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 15/11/2020 14:15, Andy Burns wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:

ARW wrote:

The small ones often do not have the functional earth fly lead.

No RCD/RCBOÂ* has a 'functional earth fly lead'.

The white lead here ...

...is not part of the trip function. No idea what its for, perhaps to
earth something in the switch...





It allows the RCBO to continue working and detect a LE fault in the
unlikely event of a missing/lost neutral.

RCD's do not have these fly leads.

And ******s oversleeve the flyleads with green/yellow. But then some
RCBO manufactures have a flylead with a green/yellow cable.


Probably worth highlighting the reason for Adam's indignation regarding
over sleeving. While the correct colour sleeving for a protective
conductor is the normal green/yellow, the correct colour for a
functional earth is actually cream.


Is this "functional earth" in the sense of reducing interference (like
AV interference)?
  #39   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25,191
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

On 24/11/2020 17:01, Adam Funk wrote:
On 2020-11-17, John Rumm wrote:

On 15/11/2020 15:14, ARW wrote:
On 15/11/2020 14:55, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 15/11/2020 14:15, Andy Burns wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:

ARW wrote:

The small ones often do not have the functional earth fly lead.

No RCD/RCBOÂ* has a 'functional earth fly lead'.

The white lead here ...

...is not part of the trip function. No idea what its for, perhaps to
earth something in the switch...





It allows the RCBO to continue working and detect a LE fault in the
unlikely event of a missing/lost neutral.

RCD's do not have these fly leads.

And ******s oversleeve the flyleads with green/yellow. But then some
RCBO manufactures have a flylead with a green/yellow cable.


Probably worth highlighting the reason for Adam's indignation regarding
over sleeving. While the correct colour sleeving for a protective
conductor is the normal green/yellow, the correct colour for a
functional earth is actually cream.


Is this "functional earth" in the sense of reducing interference (like
AV interference)?


Yes, basically any earth that is not just there to carry a fault current.


--
Cheers,

John.

/================================================== ===============\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\================================================= ================/
  #40   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,829
Default RCBO v. mini-RCBO

The Natural Philosopher wrote:

Andy Burns wrote:

The Natural Philosopher wrote:

ARW wrote:

The small ones often do not have the functional earth fly lead.

No RCD/RCBOÂ* has a 'functional earth fly lead'.


The white lead here ...


...is not part of the trip function. No idea what its for, perhaps to
earth something in the switch...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCf2alTZkLU
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Proxxon/Merlin e-motor mini-grinder vs mini air die grin dteckie Woodworking 0 September 5th 06 11:11 AM
Proxxon/Merlin e-motor mini-grinder vs mini air die grin dteckie Woodworking 0 September 5th 06 11:11 AM
Step up from mini-lathe/mini-mill Usenet Metalworking 14 April 20th 06 06:31 AM
Mini Metal lathe vs mini wood lathes - for pen turning Makin Sawdust in So. FLA. Woodturning 1 November 24th 05 05:25 AM
Swap--Jet mini for Taig mini mike nelson Woodturning 0 March 22nd 04 06:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"